[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 267 Introduced in House (IH)]
107th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. CON. RES. 267
Expressing the sense of the Congress concerning the security of nuclear
facilities in the United States.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
November 13, 2001
Mr. Gekas (for himself, Mr. Kanjorski, Mr. Pitts, and Mr. Platts)
submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to
the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committees on
Energy and Commerce, and Transportation and Infrastructure, for a
period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the
committee concerned
_______________________________________________________________________
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of the Congress concerning the security of nuclear
facilities in the United States.
Whereas there are 103 active nuclear facilities in the United States operating
at 64 sites in 31 States;
Whereas the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the nuclear power industry
maintain that security at all nuclear sites in the United States has
been bolstered since September 11, 2001, and remains sufficient to
protect employees and the residents of surrounding areas from the
possible deleterious effects of an accident or terrorist attack at any
nuclear site;
Whereas studies suggest that spent fuel storage areas, such as dry casks and
pools, may be vulnerable to terrorist attacks, and that an attack on
these areas could result in the release of lethal doses of radiation
affecting an area thousands of square kilometers in radius and many
times larger than that caused by the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima,
Japan;
Whereas radioactive iodine, which could be released in the environment as a
result of an accident or terrorist attack at a nuclear facility and
which can lead to the development of thyroid cancer, can be combated
with the expeditious use of potassium iodide;
Whereas the security of nuclear facilities is a national security concern and
not merely a regional, State, or local concern;
Whereas the Office of Homeland Security and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
issued a general security alert for the week of October 29, 2001, and
specifically requested additional security patrols or posts at nuclear
facilities, using State law enforcement personnel and, if needed, the
National Guard;
Whereas in response to that general security alert, the Governors of Arizona,
Arkansas, Connecticut, Kansas, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Jersey, New
York, and Pennsylvania, ordered National Guard units to provide security
temporarily at nuclear facilities in those States, in conjunction with
or in lieu of State and local law enforcement personnel; and
Whereas the Governors of 22 States have determined that State and local law
enforcement personnel combined with contracted security personnel can
sufficiently ensure security at nuclear facilities in their respective
States: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
(1) the President should direct the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, the Department of Defense, the National Guard
Bureau, the Department of Transportation, the Federal Bureau of
Investigations, and the Central Intelligence Agency to jointly
conduct a study to assess the present and future need for units
of the Army, Air Force, Coast Guard, and National Guard to
augment security at the 103 active nuclear facilities in the
United States;
(2) the President should direct the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission and the National Guard Bureau to work with
representatives of State law enforcement agencies to establish
basic guidelines for the proper training and use of National
Guard units deployed at nuclear facilities, emphasizing the
need for high levels of coordination with State law enforcement
personnel;
(3) National Guard units providing added security at
nuclear facilities should be funded by the Federal Government;
and
(4) the President should direct the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and the
Food and Drug Administration to establish emergency reserves of
potassium iodide tablets in those communities within the
Emergency Planning Zones of each of the 64 nuclear power sites
across the Nation, as delineated by the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
<all>