[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 162 Introduced in House (IH)]
107th CONGRESS
1st Session
H. CON. RES. 162
Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding oil and gas pipeline
routes in the South Caucasus.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
June 14, 2001
Mr. Knollenberg (for himself, Mr. Crowley, Mr. Pallone, and Mr.
Sweeney) submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was
referred to the Committee on International Relations
_______________________________________________________________________
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding oil and gas pipeline
routes in the South Caucasus.
Whereas the development of strong political, economic, and security ties among
all the nations of the South Caucasus, and between this region and the
West, will foster stability in the Caucasus;
Whereas the development of open market economies and open democratic systems in
the nations of the South Caucasus will provide positive incentives for
international private investment, increased trade, and other forms of
commercial interaction with the rest of the world;
Whereas Armenia has shown itself to be a valued ally of the United States and
the democratic nations of the world, and the United States continues to
cherish the strong bonds that exist between the two nations;
Whereas Secretary of State Colin Powell has stated that Armenia's integration
into international institutions remains a foreign policy priority for
the United States;
Whereas Armenia's exclusion from regional economic and commercial undertakings
in the South Caucasus hinders United States policy goals of promoting
stability in that region;
Whereas proposed oil and gas pipelines originating in the Azerbaijani capital of
Baku and terminating at the Turkish port of Ceyhan, via Georgia,
specifically bypass Armenia at the insistence of Azerbaijan;
Whereas other engineering and feasibility studies of proposed Baku-Ceyhan
pipelines also do not include Armenia;
Whereas the proposed Baku-Ceyhan pipeline is expected to cost more than $2.7
billion;
Whereas a pipeline from Baku to Ceyhan that traverses Armenia is more direct and
would save approximately $400,000,000 to $700,000,000 over a pipeline
following the proposed route through Georgia;
Whereas United States taxpayer funds have been used and will continue to be used
for planning and implementation of South Caucasus pipeline projects; and
Whereas United States taxpayers demand that United States funds be used
effectively and efficiently: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),
That it is the sense of the Congress that--
(1) the United States should not subsidize any oil or gas
pipeline in the South Caucasus whose commercial viability is in
doubt or which hinders the United States goal of integrating
Armenia into a secure and prosperous regional economic
framework;
(2) all proposals for South Caucasus oil and gas pipeline
routes should be carefully evaluated to ensure that all nations
of the Caucasus are included in consideration of energy and
trade routes;
(3) any engineering and feasibility study, and any project
implementation, that utilizes United States Government funds,
regarding the Baku-Ceyhan pipeline, or similar energy
transportation projects, must include trans-Armenian routes;
and
(4) the Trade Development Agency should fund and support an
oil and gas pipeline feasibility study to determine the cost
savings of a trans-Armenia Baku-Ceyhan pipeline.
<all>