[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. Res. 173 Agreed to Senate (ATS)]







106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
S. RES. 173

 To authorize representation of the Senate Committee on Armed Services 
    in the case of Philip Tinsley III v. Senate Committee on Armed 
                               Services.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 4, 1999

    Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following 
             resolution; which was considered and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
 To authorize representation of the Senate Committee on Armed Services 
    in the case of Philip Tinsley III v. Senate Committee on Armed 
                               Services.

Whereas, in the case of Philip Tinsley III v. Senate Committee on Armed 
        Services, Civil Action No. 99-951-A, pending in the United States 
        District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, the plaintiff has 
        sued the United States Senate Committee on Armed Services; and
Whereas, pursuant to sections 703(a) and 704(a)(1) of the Ethics in Government 
        Act of 1978, 2 U.S.C. Sec. Sec. 288b(a) and 288c(a)(1), the Senate may 
        direct its counsel to defend Senate committees in civil actions: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate Legal Counsel is directed to represent 
the Senate Committee on Armed Services in the case of Philip Tinsley 
III v. Senate Committee on Armed Services.
                                 <all>