    [Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
    [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
    [S. 507 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                            Calendar No. 72

    106th CONGRESS

      1st Session

                                     S. 507

                              [Report No. 106-34]

    _______________________________________________________________________

                                     A BILL

     To provide for the conservation and development of water and related
    resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various
     projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States,
                            and for other purposes.

    _______________________________________________________________________

                                 March 23, 1999

                           Reported with an amendment

                                                            Calendar No. 72
    106th CONGRESS
      1st Session
                                     S. 507

                              [Report No. 106-34]

     To provide for the conservation and development of water and related
    resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various
     projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States,
                            and for other purposes.

    _______________________________________________________________________

                       IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                                 March 2, 1999

      Mr. Warner (for himself, Mr. Chafee, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Voinovich, Mr.
    Lautenberg, Mr. Bennett, and Mrs. Boxer) introduced the following bill;
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and
                                  Public Works

                                 March 23, 1999

                   Reported by Mr. Chafee, with an amendment
     [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed
                                   in italic]

    _______________________________________________________________________

                                     A BILL

     To provide for the conservation and development of water and related
    resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various
     projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States,
                            and for other purposes.

        Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
    United States of America in Congress assembled,

    <DELETED>SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water
    Resources Development Act of 1999''.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents for this Act
    is as follows:</DELETED>

    <DELETED>Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
    <DELETED>Sec. 2. Definition of Secretary.
                   <DELETED>TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

    <DELETED>Sec. 101. Project authorizations.
    <DELETED>Sec. 102. Project modifications.
    <DELETED>Sec. 103. Project deauthorizations.
    <DELETED>Sec. 104. Studies.
                     <DELETED>TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

    <DELETED>Sec. 201. Flood hazard mitigation and riverine ecosystem
                                restoration program.
    <DELETED>Sec. 202. Shore protection.
    <DELETED>Sec. 203. Small flood control authority.
    <DELETED>Sec. 204. Use of non-Federal funds for compiling and
                                disseminating information on floods and
                                flood damages.
    <DELETED>Sec. 205. Everglades and south Florida ecosystem restoration.
    <DELETED>Sec. 206. Aquatic ecosystem restoration.
    <DELETED>Sec. 207. Beneficial uses of dredged material.
    <DELETED>Sec. 208. Voluntary contributions by States and political
                                subdivisions.
    <DELETED>Sec. 209. Recreation user fees.
    <DELETED>Sec. 210. Water resources development studies for the Pacific
                                region.
    <DELETED>Sec. 211. Missouri and Middle Mississippi Rivers enhancement
                                project.
    <DELETED>Sec. 212. Outer Continental Shelf.
    <DELETED>Sec. 213. Environmental dredging.
    <DELETED>Sec. 214. Benefit of primary flood damages avoided included in
                                benefit-cost analysis.
    <DELETED>Sec. 215. Control of aquatic plant growth.
    <DELETED>Sec. 216. Environmental infrastructure.
    <DELETED>Sec. 217. Watershed management, restoration, and development.
    <DELETED>Sec. 218. Lakes program.
    <DELETED>Sec. 219. Sediments decontamination policy.
    <DELETED>Sec. 220. Disposal of dredged material on beaches.
    <DELETED>Sec. 221. Fish and wildlife mitigation.
    <DELETED>Sec. 222. Reimbursement of non-Federal interest.
    <DELETED>Sec. 223. National Contaminated Sediment Task Force.
    <DELETED>Sec. 224. Great Lakes basin program.
    <DELETED>Sec. 225. Projects for improvement of the environment.
    <DELETED>Sec. 226. Water quality, environmental quality, recreation,
                                fish and wildlife, flood control, and
                                navigation.
    <DELETED>Sec. 227. Irrigation diversion protection and fisheries
                                enhancement assistance.
    <DELETED>Sec. 228. Small storm damage reduction projects.
    <DELETED>Sec. 229. Shore damage prevention or mitigation.
                 <DELETED>TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

    <DELETED>Sec. 301. Dredging of salt ponds in the State of Rhode Island.
    <DELETED>Sec. 302. Upper Susquehanna River basin, Pennsylvania and New
                                York.
    <DELETED>Sec. 303. Small flood control projects.
    <DELETED>Sec. 304. Small navigation projects.
    <DELETED>Sec. 305. Streambank protection projects.
    <DELETED>Sec. 306. Aquatic ecosystem restoration, Springfield, Oregon.
    <DELETED>Sec. 307. Guilford and New Haven, Connecticut.
    <DELETED>Sec. 308. Francis Bland Floodway Ditch.
    <DELETED>Sec. 309. Caloosahatchee River basin, Florida.
    <DELETED>Sec. 310. Cumberland, Maryland, flood project mitigation.
    <DELETED>Sec. 311. City of Miami Beach, Florida.
    <DELETED>Sec. 312. Sardis Reservoir, Oklahoma.
    <DELETED>Sec. 313. Upper Mississippi River and Illinois waterway system
                                navigation modernization.
    <DELETED>Sec. 314. Upper Mississippi River management.
    <DELETED>Sec. 315. Research and development program for Columbia and
                                Snake Rivers salmon survival.
    <DELETED>Sec. 316. Nine Mile Run habitat restoration, Pennsylvania.
    <DELETED>Sec. 317. Larkspur Ferry Channel, California.
    <DELETED>Sec. 318. Comprehensive Flood Impact-Response Modeling System.
    <DELETED>Sec. 319. Study regarding innovative financing for small and
                                medium-sized ports.
    <DELETED>Sec. 320. Candy Lake project, Osage County, Oklahoma.
    <DELETED>Sec. 321. Salcha River and Piledriver Slough, Fairbanks,
                                Alaska.
    <DELETED>Sec. 322. Eyak River, Cordova, Alaska.
    <DELETED>Sec. 323. North Padre Island storm damage reduction and
                                environmental restoration project.
    <DELETED>Sec. 324. Kanopolis Lake, Kansas.
    <DELETED>Sec. 325. New York City watershed.
    <DELETED>Sec. 326. City of Charlevoix reimbursement, Michigan.
    <DELETED>Sec. 327. Hamilton Dam flood control project, Michigan.
    <DELETED>Sec. 328. Holes Creek flood control project, Ohio.
    <DELETED>Sec. 329. Overflow management facility, Rhode Island.

    <DELETED>SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SECRETARY.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of
    the Army.</DELETED>

              <DELETED>TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 101. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    (a) Projects With Chief's Reports.--The following projects
    for water resources development and conservation and other purposes are
    authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in
    accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, described in
    the respective reports designated in this section:</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) Sand point harbor, alaska.--The project for
            navigation, Sand Point Harbor, Alaska: Report of the Chief of
            Engineers dated October 13, 1998, at a total cost of
            $11,760,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $6,964,000 and
            an estimated non-Federal cost of $4,796,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Rio salado (salt river), arizona.--The project
            for environmental restoration, Rio Salado (Salt River),
            Arizona: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated August 20,
            1998, at a total cost of $88,048,000, with an estimated Federal
            cost of $56,355,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
            $31,693,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) Tucson drainage area, arizona.--The project
            for flood damage reduction, environmental restoration, and
            recreation, Tucson drainage area, Arizona: Report of the Chief
            of Engineers dated May 20, 1998, at a total cost of
            $29,900,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $16,768,000 and
            an estimated non-Federal cost of $13,132,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (4) American river watershed, california.--
            </DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) In general.--The project for flood
                    damage reduction described as the Folsom Stepped
                    Release Plan in the Corps of Engineers Supplemental
                    Information Report for the American River Watershed
                    Project, California, dated March 1996, at a total cost
                    of $505,400,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
                    $329,300,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
                    $176,100,000.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) Implementation.--</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (i) In general.--Implementation of
                            the measures by the Secretary pursuant to
                            subparagraph (A) shall be undertaken after
                            completion of the levee stabilization and
                            strengthening and flood warning features
                            authorized by section 101(a)(1) of the Water
                            Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat.
                            3662).</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (ii) Folsom dam and reservoir.--
                            The Secretary may undertake measures at the
                            Folsom Dam and Reservoir authorized under
                            subparagraph (A) only after reviewing the
                            design of such measures to determine if
                            modifications are necessary to account for
                            changed hydrologic conditions and any other
                            changed conditions in the project area,
                            including operational and construction impacts
                            that have occurred since completion of the
                            report referred to in subparagraph (A). The
                            Secretary shall conduct the review and develop
                            the modifications to the Folsom Dam and
                            Reservoir with the full participation of the
                            Secretary of the Interior.</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (iii) Remaining downstream
                            elements.--</DELETED>
                                    <DELETED>    (I) In general.--
                                    Implementation of the remaining
                                    downstream elements authorized pursuant
                                    to subparagraph (A) may be undertaken
                                    only after the Secretary, in
                                    consultation with affected Federal,
                                    State, regional, and local entities,
                                    has reviewed the elements to determine
                                    if modifications are necessary to
                                    address changes in the hydrologic
                                    conditions, any other changed
                                    conditions in the project area that
                                    have occurred since completion of the
                                    report referred to in subparagraph (A)
                                    and any design modifications for the
                                    Folsom Dam and Reservoir made by the
                                    Secretary in implementing the measures
                                    referred to in clause (ii), and has
                                    issued a report on the
                                    review.</DELETED>
                                    <DELETED>    (II) Principles and
                                    guidelines.--The review shall be
                                    prepared in accordance with the
                                    economic and environmental principles
                                    and guidelines for water and related
                                    land resources implementation studies,
                                    and no construction may be initiated
                                    unless the Secretary determines that
                                    the remaining downstream elements are
                                    technically sound, environmentally
                                    acceptable, and economically
                                    justified.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (5) Llagas creek, california.--The project for
            completion of the remaining reaches of the Natural Resources
            Conservation Service flood control project at Llagas Creek,
            California, undertaken pursuant to section 5 of the Watershed
            Protection and Flood Prevention Act (16 U.S.C. 1005),
            substantially in accordance with the requirements of local
            cooperation as specified in section 4 of that Act (16 U.S.C.
            1004) at a total cost of $45,000,000, with an estimated Federal
            cost of $21,800,000 and an estimated non-Federal share of
            $23,200,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (6) South sacramento county streams, california.--
            The project for flood control, environmental restoration, and
            recreation, South Sacramento County streams, California: Report
            of the Chief of Engineers dated October 6, 1998, at a total
            cost of $65,500,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
            $41,200,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
            $24,300,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (7) Upper guadalupe river, california.--
            Construction of the locally preferred plan for flood damage
            reduction and recreation, Upper Guadalupe River, California,
            described as the Bypass Channel Plan of the Chief of Engineers
            dated August 19, 1998, at a total cost of $137,600,000, with an
            estimated Federal cost of $44,000,000 and an estimated non-
            Federal cost of $93,600,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (8) Yuba river basin, california.--The project for
            flood damage reduction, Yuba River Basin, California: Report of
            the Chief of Engineers dated November 25, 1998, at a total cost
            of $26,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $17,350,000
            and an estimated non-Federal cost of $9,250,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (9) Delaware bay coastline: delaware and new
            jersey-broadkill beach, delaware.--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) In general.--The project for hurricane
                    and storm damage reduction and shore protection,
                    Delaware Bay coastline: Delaware and New Jersey-
                    Broadkill Beach, Delaware, Report of the Chief of
                    Engineers dated August 17, 1998, at a total cost of
                    $9,049,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
                    $5,674,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
                    $3,375,000.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) Periodic nourishment.--Periodic
                    nourishment is authorized for a 50-year period at an
                    estimated average annual cost of $538,200, with an
                    estimated annual Federal cost of $349,800 and an
                    estimated annual non-Federal cost of
                    $188,400.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (10) Delaware bay coastline: delaware and new
            jersey-port mahon, delaware.--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) In general.--The project for ecosystem
                    restoration and shore protection, Delaware Bay
                    coastline: Delaware and New Jersey-Port Mahon,
                    Delaware: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated
                    September 28, 1998, at a total cost of $7,644,000, with
                    an estimated Federal cost of $4,969,000 and an
                    estimated non-Federal cost of $2,675,000.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) Periodic nourishment.--Periodic
                    nourishment is authorized for a 50-year period at an
                    estimated average annual cost of $234,000, with an
                    estimated annual Federal cost of $152,000 and an
                    estimated annual non-Federal cost of $82,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (11) Hillsboro and okeechobee aquifer storage and
            recovery project, florida.--The project for aquifer storage and
            recovery described in the Corps of Engineers Central and
            Southern Florida Water Supply Study, Florida, dated April 1989,
            and in House Document 369, dated July 30, 1968, at a total cost
            of $27,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $13,500,000
            and an estimated non-Federal cost of $13,500,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (12) Indian river county, florida.--
            Notwithstanding section 1001(a) of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(a)), the project for
            shoreline protection, Indian River County, Florida, authorized
            by section 501(a) of that Act (100 Stat. 4134), shall remain
            authorized for construction through December 31,
            2002.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (13) Lido key beach, sarasota, florida.--
            </DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) In general.--The project for shore
                    protection at Lido Key Beach, Sarasota, Florida,
                    authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act
                    of 1970 (84 Stat. 1819) and deauthorized by operation
                    of section 1001(b) of the Water Resources Development
                    Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)), is authorized to be
                    carried out by the Secretary at a total cost of
                    $5,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
                    $3,380,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
                    $1,820,000.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) Periodic nourishment.--Periodic
                    nourishment is authorized for a 50-year period at an
                    estimated average annual cost of $602,000, with an
                    estimated annual Federal cost of $391,000 and an
                    estimated annual non-Federal cost of
                    $211,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (14) Tampa harbor-big bend channel, florida.--The
            project for navigation, Tampa Harbor-Big Bend Channel, Florida:
            Report of the Chief of Engineers dated October 13, 1998, at a
            total cost of $12,356,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
            $6,235,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
            $6,121,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (15) Brunswick harbor, georgia.--The project for
            navigation, Brunswick Harbor, Georgia: Report of the Chief of
            Engineers dated October 6, 1998, at a total cost of
            $50,717,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $32,966,000 and
            an estimated non-Federal cost of $17,751,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (16) Beargrass creek, kentucky.--The project for
            flood damage reduction, Beargrass Creek, Kentucky: Report of
            the Chief of Engineers dated May 12, 1998, at a total cost of
            $11,172,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $7,262,000 and
            an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,910,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (17) Amite river and tributaries, louisiana, east
            baton rouge parish watershed.--The project for flood damage
            reduction and recreation, Amite River and Tributaries,
            Louisiana, East Baton Rouge Parish Watershed: Report of the
            Chief of Engineers, dated December 23, 1996, at a total cost of
            $112,900,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $73,400,000 and
            an estimated non-Federal cost of $39,500,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (18) Baltimore harbor anchorages and channels,
            maryland and virginia.--The project for navigation, Baltimore
            Harbor Anchorages and Channels, Maryland and Virginia: Report
            of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 8, 1998, at a total cost
            of $28,430,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $19,000,000
    and an estimated non-Federal cost of $9,430,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (19) Red lake river at crookston, minnesota.--The
            project for flood damage reduction, Red Lake River at
            Crookston, Minnesota: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated
            April 20, 1998, at a total cost of $8,950,000, with an
            estimated Federal cost of $5,720,000 and an estimated non-
            Federal cost of $3,230,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (20) New jersey shore protection, townsends inlet
            to cape may inlet, new jersey.--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) In general.--The project for hurricane
                    and storm damage reduction, ecosystem restoration, and
                    shore protection, New Jersey coastline, Townsends Inlet
                    to Cape May Inlet, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of
                    Engineers dated September 28, 1998, at a total cost of
                    $56,503,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
                    $36,727,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
                    $19,776,000.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) Periodic nourishment.--Periodic
                    nourishment is authorized for a 50-year period at an
                    estimated average annual cost of $2,000,000, with an
                    estimated annual Federal cost of $1,300,000 and an
                    estimated annual non-Federal cost of
                    $700,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (21) Park river, north dakota.--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) In general.--Subject to the condition
                    stated in subparagraph (B), the project for flood
                    control, Park River, Grafton, North Dakota, authorized
                    by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development
                    Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4121) and deauthorized under
                    section 1001(a) of the Water Resources Development Act
                    of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a), at a total cost of
                    $28,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
                    $18,265,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
                    $9,835,000.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) Condition.--No construction may be
                    initiated unless the Secretary determines through a
                    general reevaluation report using current data, that
                    the project is technically sound, environmentally
                    acceptable, and economically justified.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (22) Salt creek, graham, texas.--The project for
            flood control, environmental restoration, and recreation, Salt
            Creek, Graham, Texas: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated
            October 6, 1998, at a total cost of $10,080,000, with an
            estimated Federal cost of $6,560,000 and an estimated non-
            Federal cost of $3,520,000.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (b) Projects Subject to a Final Report.--The following
    projects for water resources development and conservation and other
    purposes are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary
    substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to the
    conditions recommended in a final report of the Chief of Engineers as
    approved by the Secretary, if the report of the Chief is completed not
    later than December 31, 1999:</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) Nome harbor improvements, alaska.--The project
            for navigation, Nome Harbor Improvements, Alaska, at a total
            cost of $24,608,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of
            $19,660,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of
            $4,948,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Seward harbor, alaska.--The project for
            navigation, Seward Harbor, Alaska, at a total cost of
            $12,240,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of $4,364,000
            and an estimated first non-Federal cost of
            $7,876,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) Hamilton airfield wetland restoration,
            california.--The project for environmental restoration at
            Hamilton Airfield, California, at a total cost of $55,200,000,
            with an estimated Federal cost of $41,400,000 and an estimated
            non-Federal cost of $13,800,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (4) Oakland, california.--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) In general.--The project for
                    navigation and environmental restoration, Oakland,
                    California, at a total cost of $214,340,000, with an
                    estimated Federal cost of $143,450,000 and an estimated
                    non-Federal cost of $70,890,000.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) Berthing areas and other local service
                    facilities.--The non-Federal interests shall provide
                    berthing areas and other local service facilities
                    necessary for the project at an estimated cost of
                    $42,310,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (5) Delaware bay coastline: delaware and new
            jersey-roosevelt inlet-lewes beach, delaware.--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) In general.--The project for
                    navigation mitigation, shore protection, and hurricane
                    and storm damage reduction, Delaware Bay coastline:
                    Delaware and New Jersey-Roosevelt Inlet-Lewes Beach,
                    Delaware, at a total cost of $3,393,000, with an
                    estimated Federal cost of $2,620,000 and an estimated
                    non-Federal cost of $773,000.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) Periodic nourishment.--Periodic
                    nourishment is authorized for a 50-year period at an
                    estimated average annual cost of $196,000, with an
                    estimated annual Federal cost of $152,000 and an
                    estimated annual non-Federal cost of $44,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (6) Delaware coast from cape henelopen to fenwick
            island, bethany beach/south bethany beach, delaware.--
            </DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) In general.--The project for hurricane
                    and storm damage reduction and shore protection,
                    Delaware Coast from Cape Henelopen to Fenwick Island,
                    Bethany Beach/South Bethany Beach, Delaware, at a total
                    cost of $22,205,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
                    $14,433,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
                    $7,772,000.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) Periodic nourishment.--Periodic
                    nourishment is authorized for a 50-year period at an
                    estimated average annual cost of $1,584,000, with an
                    estimated annual Federal cost of $1,030,000 and an
                    estimated annual non-Federal cost of
                    $554,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (7) Jacksonville harbor, florida.--The project for
            navigation, Jacksonville Harbor, Florida, at a total cost of
            $26,116,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $9,129,000 and
            an estimated non-Federal cost of $16,987,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (8) Little talbot island, duval county, florida.--
            The project for hurricane and storm damage prevention and shore
            protection, Little Talbot Island, Duval County, Florida, at a
            total cost of $5,915,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
            $3,839,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
            $2,076,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (9) Ponce de leon inlet, volusia county,
            florida.--The project for navigation and recreation, Ponce de
            Leon Inlet, Volusia County, Florida, at a total cost of
            $5,454,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $2,988,000 and an
            estimated non-Federal cost of $2,466,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (10) Savannah harbor expansion, georgia.--
            </DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph
                    (B), the Secretary may carry out the project for
                    navigation, Savannah Harbor expansion, Georgia,
                    substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject
                    to the conditions, recommended in a final report of the
                    Chief of Engineers, with such modifications as the
                    Secretary deems appropriate, at a total cost of
                    $230,174,000 (of which amount a portion is authorized
                    for implementation of the mitigation plan), with an
                    estimated Federal cost of $145,160,000 and an estimated
                    non-Federal cost of $85,014,000.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) Conditions.--The project authorized by
                    subparagraph (A) may be carried out only after--
                    </DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (i) the Secretary, in consultation
                            with affected Federal, State, regional, and
                            local entities, has reviewed and approved an
                            Environmental Impact Statement that includes--
                            </DELETED>
                                    <DELETED>    (I) an analysis of the
                                    impacts of project depth alternatives
                                    ranging from 42 feet through 48 feet;
                                    and</DELETED>
                                    <DELETED>    (II) a selected plan for
                                    navigation and associated mitigation
                                    plan as required by section 906(a) of
                                    the Water Resources Development Act of
                                    1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283); and</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (ii) the Secretary of the
                            Interior, the Secretary of Commerce, and the
                            Administrator of the Environmental Protection
                            Agency, with the Secretary, have approved the
                            selected plan and have determined that the
                            mitigation plan adequately addresses the
                            potential environmental impacts of the
                            project.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (C) Mitigation requirements.--The
                    mitigation plan shall be implemented in advance of or
                    concurrently with construction of the
                    project.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (11) Turkey creek basin, kansas city, missouri and
            kansas city, kansas.--The project for flood damage reduction,
            Turkey Creek Basin, Kansas City, Missouri, and Kansas City,
            Kansas, at a total cost of $42,875,000 with an estimated
            Federal cost of $25,596,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost
            of $17,279,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (12) Lower cape may meadows, cape may point, new
            jersey.--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) In general.--The project for
                    navigation mitigation, ecosystem restoration, shore
                    protection, and hurricane and storm damage reduction,
                    Lower Cape May Meadows, Cape May Point, New Jersey, at
                    a total cost of $15,952,000, with an estimated Federal
                    cost of $12,118,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost
                    of $3,834,000.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) Periodic nourishment.--Periodic
                    nourishment is authorized for a 50-year period at an
                    estimated average annual cost of $1,114,000, with an
                    estimated annual Federal cost of $897,000 and an
                    estimated annual non-Federal cost of
                    $217,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (13) New jersey shore protection, brigantine inlet
            to great egg harbor, brigantine island, new jersey.--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) In general.--The project for hurricane
                    and storm damage reduction and shore protection, New
                    Jersey Shore protection, Brigantine Inlet to Great Egg
                    Harbor, Brigantine Island, New Jersey, at a total cost
                    of $4,970,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
                    $3,230,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
                    $1,740,000.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) Periodic nourishment.--Periodic
                    nourishment is authorized for a 50-year period at an
                    estimated average annual cost of $465,000, with an
                    estimated annual Federal cost of $302,000 and an
                    estimated annual non-Federal cost of
                    $163,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (14) Memphis harbor, memphis, tennessee.--
            </DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph
                    (B), the project for navigation, Memphis Harbor,
                    Memphis, Tennessee, authorized by section 601(a) of the
                    Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat.
                    4145) and deauthorized under section 1001(a) of that
                    Act (33 U.S.C. 579a(a)) is authorized to be carried out
                    by the Secretary.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) Condition.--No construction may be
                    initiated unless the Secretary determines through a
                    general reevaluation report using current data, that
                    the project is technically sound, environmentally
                    acceptable, and economically justified.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (15) Howard hanson dam, washington.--The project
            for water supply and ecosystem restoration, Howard Hanson Dam,
            Washington, at a total cost of $75,600,000, with an estimated
            Federal cost of $36,900,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost
            of $38,700,000.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 102. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    (a) Projects With Reports.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) San lorenzo river, california.--The project
            for flood control, San Lorenzo River, California, authorized by
            section 101(a)(5) of the Water Resources Development Act of
            1996 (110 Stat. 3663), is modified to authorize the Secretary
            to include as a part of the project streambank erosion control
            measures to be undertaken substantially in accordance with the
            report entitled ``Bank Stabilization Concept, Laurel Street
            Extension'', dated April 23, 1998, at a total cost of
            $4,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $2,600,000 and an
            estimated non-Federal cost of $1,400,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Wood river, grand island, nebraska.--The
            project for flood control, Wood River, Grand Island, Nebraska,
            authorized by section 101(a)(19) of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3665) is modified to
            authorize the Secretary to construct the project in accordance
            with the Corps of Engineers report dated June 29, 1998, at a
            total cost of $17,039,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
            $9,730,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
            $7,309,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) Absecon island, new jersey.--The project for
            Absecon Island, New Jersey, authorized by section 101(b)(13) of
            the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3668) is
            amended to authorize the Secretary to reimburse the non-Federal
            interests for all work performed, consistent with the
            authorized project.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (4) Arthur kill, new york and new jersey.--
            </DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) In general.--The project for
                    navigation, Arthur Kill, New York and New Jersey,
                    authorized by section 202(b) of the Water Resources
                    Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4098) and modified
                    by section 301(b)(11) of the Water Resources
                    Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3711), is further
                    modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the
                    project at a total cost of $276,800,000, with an
                    estimated Federal cost of $183,200,000 and an estimated
                    non-Federal cost of $93,600,000.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) Berthing areas and other local service
                    facilities.--The non-Federal interests shall provide
                    berthing areas and other local service facilities
                    necessary for the project at an estimated cost of
                    $38,900,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (5) Waurika lake, oklahoma, water conveyance
            facilities.--The requirement for the Waurika Project Master
            Conservancy District to repay the $2,900,000 in costs
            (including interest) resulting from the October 1991 settlement
            of the claim of the Travelers Insurance Company before the
            United States Claims Court related to construction of the water
            conveyance facilities authorized by the first section of Public
            Law 88-253 (77 Stat. 841) is waived.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (b) Projects Subject to Reports.--The following projects
    are modified as follows, except that no funds may be obligated to carry
    out work under such modifications until completion of a final report by
    the Chief of Engineers, as approved by the Secretary, finding that such
    work is technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and economically
    justified, as applicable:</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) Thornton reservoir, cook county, illinois.--
            </DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) In general.--The Thornton Reservoir
                    project, an element of the project for flood control,
                    Chicagoland Underflow Plan, Illinois, authorized by
                    section 3(a)(5) of the Water Resources Development Act
                    of 1988 (102 Stat. 4013), is modified to authorize the
                    Secretary to include additional permanent flood control
                    storage attributable to the Thorn Creek Reservoir
                    project, Little Calumet River Watershed, Illinois,
                    approved under the Watershed Protection and Flood
                    Prevention Act (16 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.).</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) Cost sharing.--Costs for the Thornton
                    Reservoir project shall be shared in accordance with
                    section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of
                    1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213).</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (C) Transitional storage.--The Secretary
                    of Agriculture may cooperate with non-Federal interests
                    to provide, on a transitional basis, flood control
                    storage for the Thorn Creek Reservoir project in the
                    west lobe of the Thornton quarry.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (D) Crediting.--The Secretary may credit
                    against the non-Federal share of the Thornton Reservoir
                    project all design and construction costs incurred by
                    the non-Federal interests before the date of enactment
                    of this Act.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (E) Reevaluation report.--The Secretary
                    shall determine the credits authorized by subparagraph
                    (D) that are integral to the Thornton Reservoir project
                    and the current total project costs based on a limited
                    reevaluation report.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Wells harbor, wells, maine.--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) In general.--The project for
                    navigation, Wells Harbor, Maine, authorized by section
                    101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 480),
                    is modified to authorize the Secretary to realign the
                    channel and anchorage areas based on a harbor design
                    capacity of 150 craft.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) Deauthorization of certain portions.--
                    The following portions of the project are not
                    authorized after the date of enactment of this
                    Act:</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (i) The portion of the 6-foot
                            channel the boundaries of which begin at a
                            point with coordinates N177,992.00,
                            E394,831.00, thence running south 83 degrees 58
                            minutes 14.8 seconds west 10.38 feet to a point
                            N177,990.91, E394,820.68, thence running south
                            11 degrees 46 minutes 47.7 seconds west 991.76
                            feet to a point N177,020.04, E394,618.21,
                            thence running south 78 degrees 13 minutes 45.7
                            seconds east 10.00 feet to a point N177,018.00,
                            E394,628.00, thence running north 11 degrees 46
                            minutes 22.8 seconds east 994.93 feet to the
                            point of origin.</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (ii) The portion of the 6-foot
                            anchorage the boundaries of which begin at a
                            point with coordinates N177,778.07,
                            E394,336.96, thence running south 51 degrees 58
                            minutes 32.7 seconds west 15.49 feet to a point
                            N177,768.53, E394,324.76, thence running south
                            11 degrees 46 minutes 26.5 seconds west 672.87
                            feet to a point N177,109.82, E394,187.46,
                            thence running south 78 degrees 13 minutes 45.7
                            seconds east 10.00 feet to a point N177,107.78,
                            E394,197.25, thence running north 11 degrees 46
                            minutes 25.4 seconds east 684.70 feet to the
                            point of origin.</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (iii) The portion of the 10-foot
                            settling basin the boundaries of which begin at
                            a point with coordinates N177,107.78,
                            E394,197.25, thence running north 78 degrees 13
                            minutes 45.7 seconds west 10.00 feet to a point
                            N177,109.82, E394,187.46, thence running south
                            11 degrees 46 minutes 15.7 seconds west 300.00
                            feet to a point N176,816.13, E394,126.26,
                            thence running south 78 degrees 12 minutes 21.4
                            seconds east 9.98 feet to a point N176,814.09,
                            E394,136.03, thence running north 11 degrees 46
                            minutes 29.1 seconds east 300.00 feet to the
                            point of origin.</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (iv) The portion of the 10-foot
                            settling basin the boundaries of which begin at
                            a point with coordinates N177,018.00,
                            E394,628.00, thence running north 78 degrees 13
                            minutes 45.7 seconds west 10.00 feet to a point
                            N177,020.04, E394,618.21, thence running south
                            11 degrees 46 minutes 44.0 seconds west 300.00
                            feet to a point N176,726.36, E394,556.97,
                            thence running south 78 degrees 12 minutes 30.3
                            seconds east 10.03 feet to a point N176,724.31,
                            E394,566.79, thence running north 11 degrees 46
                            minutes 22.4 seconds east 300.00 feet to the
                            point of origin.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (C) Redesignations.--The following
                    portions of the project shall be redesignated as part
                    of the 6-foot anchorage:</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (i) The portion of the 6-foot
                            channel the boundaries of which begin at a
                            point with coordinates N177,990.91,
                            E394,820.68, thence running south 83 degrees 58
                            minutes 40.8 seconds west 94.65 feet to a point
                            N177,980.98, E394,726.55, thence running south
                            11 degrees 46 minutes 22.4 seconds west 962.83
                            feet to a point N177,038.40, E394,530.10,
                            thence running south 78 degrees 13 minutes 45.7
                            seconds east 90.00 feet to a point N177,020.04,
                            E394,618.21, thence running north 11 degrees 46
                            minutes 47.7 seconds east 991.76 feet to the
                            point of origin.</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (ii) The portion of the 10-foot
                            inner harbor settling basin the boundaries of
                            which begin at a point with coordinates
                            N177,020.04, E394,618.21, thence running north
                            78 degrees 13 minutes 30.5 seconds west 160.00
                            feet to a point N177,052.69, E394,461.58,
                            thence running south 11 degrees 46 minutes 45.4
                            seconds west 299.99 feet to a point
                            N176,759.02, E394,400.34, thence running south
                            78 degrees 13 minutes 17.9 seconds east 160
                            feet to a point N176,726.36, E394,556.97,
                            thence running north 11 degrees 46 minutes 44.0
                            seconds east 300.00 feet to the point of
                            origin.</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (iii) The portion of the 6-foot
                            anchorage the boundaries of which begin at a
                            point with coordinates N178,102.26,
                            E394,751.83, thence running south 51 degrees 59
                            minutes 42.1 seconds west 526.51 feet to a
                            point N177,778.07, E394,336.96, thence running
                            south 11 degrees 46 minutes 26.6 seconds west
                            511.83 feet to a point N177,277.01,
                            E394,232.52, thence running south 78 degrees 13
                            minutes 17.9 seconds east 80.00 feet to a point
                            N177,260.68, E394,310.84, thence running north
                            11 degrees 46 minutes 24.8 seconds east 482.54
                            feet to a point N177,733.07, E394,409.30,
                            thence running north 51 degrees 59 minutes 41.0
                            seconds east 402.63 feet to a point
                            N177,980.98, E394,726.55, thence running north
                            11 degrees 46 minutes 27.6 seconds east 123.89
    feet to the point of origin.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (D) Realignment.--The 6-foot anchorage
                    area described in subparagraph (C)(iii) shall be
                    realigned to include the area located south of the
                    inner harbor settling basin in existence on the date of
                    enactment of this Act beginning at a point with
                    coordinates N176,726.36, E394,556.97, thence running
                    north 78 degrees 13 minutes 17.9 seconds west 160.00
                    feet to a point N176,759.02, E394,400.34, thence
                    running south 11 degrees 47 minutes 03.8 seconds west
                    45 feet to a point N176,714.97, E394,391.15, thence
                    running south 78 degrees 13 minutes 17.9 seconds 160.00
                    feet to a point N176,682.31, E394,547.78, thence
                    running north 11 degrees 47 minutes 03.8 seconds east
                    45 feet to the point of origin.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (E) Relocation.--The Secretary may
                    relocate the settling basin feature of the project to
                    the outer harbor between the jetties.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) New york harbor and adjacent channels, port
            jersey, new jersey.--The project for navigation, New York
            Harbor and Adjacent Channels, Port Jersey, New Jersey,
            authorized by section 202(b) of the Water Resources Development
            Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4098), is modified to authorize the
            Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of
            $103,267,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $76,909,000 and
            an estimated non-Federal cost of $26,358,000.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (c) Beaver Lake, Arkansas, Water Supply Storage
    Reallocation.--The Secretary shall reallocate approximately 31,000
    additional acre-feet at Beaver Lake, Arkansas, to water supply storage
    at no cost to the Beaver Water District or the Carroll-Boone Water
    District, except that at no time shall the bottom of the conservation
    pool be at an elevation that is less than 1,076 feet, NGVD.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (d) Tolchester Channel S-Turn, Baltimore, Maryland.--The
    project for navigation, Baltimore Harbor and Channels, Maryland,
    authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (72 Stat.
    297), is modified to direct the Secretary to straighten the Tolchester
    Channel S-turn as part of project maintenance.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (e) Tropicana Wash and Flamingo Wash, Nevada.--Any Federal
    costs associated with the Tropicana and Flamingo Washes, Nevada,
    authorized by section 101(13) of the Water Resources Development Act of
    1992 (106 Stat. 4803), incurred by the non-Federal interest to
    accelerate or modify construction of the project, in cooperation with
    the Corps of Engineers, shall be considered to be eligible for
    reimbursement by the Secretary.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (f) Rediversion Project, Cooper River, Charleston Harbor,
    South Carolina.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) In general.--The rediversion project, Cooper
            River, Charleston Harbor, South Carolina, authorized by section
            101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731) and
            modified by title I of the Energy and Water Development
            Appropriations Act, 1992 (105 Stat. 517), is modified to
            authorize the Secretary to pay the State of South Carolina not
            more than $3,750,000, if the State enters into an agreement
            with the Secretary providing that the State shall perform all
            future operation of the St. Stephen, South Carolina, fish lift
            (including associated studies to assess the efficacy of the
            fish lift).</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Contents.--The agreement shall specify the
            terms and conditions under which payment will be made and the
            rights of, and remedies available to, the Secretary to recover
            all or a portion of the payment if the State suspends or
            terminates operation of the fish lift or fails to perform the
            operation in a manner satisfactory to the Secretary.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) Maintenance.--Maintenance of the fish lift
            shall remain a Federal responsibility.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (g) Trinity River and Tributaries, Texas.--The project for
    flood control and navigation, Trinity River and tributaries, Texas,
    authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat.
    1091), is modified to add environmental restoration as a project
    purpose.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (h) Beach Erosion Control and Hurricane Protection,
    Virginia Beach, Virginia.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) Acceptance of funds.--In any fiscal year that
            the Corps of Engineers does not receive appropriations
            sufficient to meet expected project expenditures for that year,
            the Secretary shall accept from the city of Virginia Beach,
            Virginia, for purposes of the project for beach erosion control
            and hurricane protection, Virginia Beach, Virginia, authorized
            by section 501(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of
            1986 (100 Stat. 4136), such funds as the city may advance for
            the project.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Repayment.--Subject to the availability of
            appropriations, the Secretary shall repay, without interest,
            the amount of any advance made under paragraph (1), from
            appropriations that may be provided by Congress for river and
            harbor, flood control, shore protection, and related
            projects.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (i) Elizabeth River, Chesapeake, Virginia.--
    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, after the date of enactment
    of this Act, the city of Chesapeake, Virginia, shall not be obligated
    to make the annual cash contribution required under paragraph 1(9) of
    the Local Cooperation Agreement dated December 12, 1978, between the
    Government and the city for the project for navigation, southern branch
    of Elizabeth River, Chesapeake, Virginia.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (j) Payment Option, Moorefield, West Virginia.--The
    Secretary may permit the non-Federal interests for the project for
    flood control, Moorefield, West Virginia, to pay without interest the
    remaining non-Federal cost over a period not to exceed 30 years, to be
    determined by the Secretary.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (k) Miami Dade Agricultural and Rural Land Retention Plan
    and South Biscayne, Florida.--Section 528(b)(3) of the Water Resources
    Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3768) is amended by adding at the
    end the following:</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    ``(D) Credit and reimbursement of past and
                    future activities.--The Secretary may afford credit to
                    or reimburse the non-Federal sponsors (using funds
                    authorized by subparagraph (C)) for the reasonable
                    costs of any work that has been performed or will be
                    performed in connection with a study or activity
                    meeting the requirements of subparagraph (A) if--
                    </DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    ``(i) the Secretary determines
                            that--</DELETED>
                                    <DELETED>    ``(I) the work performed
                                    by the non-Federal sponsors will
                                    substantially expedite completion of a
                                    critical restoration project;
                                    and</DELETED>
                                    <DELETED>    ``(II) the work is
                                    necessary for a critical restoration
                                    project; and</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    ``(ii) the credit or reimbursement
                            is granted pursuant to a project-specific
                            agreement that prescribes the terms and
                            conditions of the credit or
                            reimbursement.''.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (l) Lake Michigan, Illinois.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) In general.--The project for storm damage
            reduction and shoreline protection, Lake Michigan, Illinois,
            from Wilmette, Illinois, to the Illinois-Indiana State line,
            authorized by section 101(a)(12) of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3664), is modified to
            provide for reimbursement for additional project work
            undertaken by the non-Federal interest.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Credit or reimbursement.--The Secretary shall
            credit or reimburse the non-Federal interest for the Federal
            share of project costs incurred by the non-Federal interest in
            designing, constructing, or reconstructing reach 2F (700 feet
            south of Fullerton Avenue and 500 feet north of Fullerton
            Avenue), reach 3M (Meigs Field), and segments 7 and 8 of reach
            4 (43rd Street to 57th Street), if the non-Federal interest
            carries out the work in accordance with plans approved by the
            Secretary, at an estimated total cost of $83,300,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) Reimbursement.--The Secretary shall reimburse
            the non-Federal interest for the Federal share of project costs
            incurred by the non-Federal interest in reconstructing the
            revetment structures protecting Solidarity Drive in Chicago,
            Illinois, before the signing of the project cooperation
            agreement, at an estimated total cost of $7,600,000.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (m) Measurements of Lake Michigan Diversions, Illinois.--
    Section 1142(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100
    Stat. 4253) is amended by striking ``$250,000 per fiscal year for each
    fiscal year beginning after September 30, 1986'' and inserting ``a
    total of $1,250,000 for each of fiscal years 1999 through
    2003''.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (n) Project for Navigation, Dubuque, Iowa.--The project
    for navigation at Dubuque, Iowa, authorized by section 101 of the River
    and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 482), is modified to authorize the
    development of a wetland demonstration area of approximately 1.5 acres
    to be developed and operated by the Dubuque County Historical Society
    or a successor nonprofit organization.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (o) Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee.--The Secretary may
    credit against the non-Federal share work performed in the project area
    of the Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee, Mississippi River,
    Louisiana, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources
    Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4117).</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (p) Jackson County, Mississippi.--The project for
    environmental infrastructure, Jackson County, Mississippi, authorized
    by section 219(c)(5) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992
    (106 Stat. 4835) and modified by section 504 of the Water Resources
    Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3757), is modified to direct the
    Secretary to provide a credit, not to exceed $5,000,000, against the
    non-Federal share of the cost of the project for the costs incurred by
    the Jackson County Board of Supervisors since February 8, 1994, in
    constructing the project, if the Secretary determines that such costs
    are for work that the Secretary determines was compatible with and
    integral to the project.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (q) Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, South Carolina.--
    </DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) In general.--Except as otherwise provided in
            this paragraph, the Secretary shall convey to the State of
            South Carolina all right, title, and interest of the United
            States in the parcels of land described in subparagraph (B)
            that are currently being managed by the South Carolina
            Department of Natural Resources for fish and wildlife
            mitigation purposes for the Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake,
            South Carolina, project authorized by the Flood Control Act of
            1966 and modified by the Water Resources Development Act of
            1986.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Land description.--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) In general.--The parcels of land to be
                    conveyed are described in Exhibits A, F, and H of Army
                    Lease No. DACW21-1-93-0910 and associated supplemental
                    agreements or are designated in red in Exhibit A of
                    Army License No. DACW21-3-85-1904, excluding all
                    designated parcels in the license that are below
                    elevation 346 feet mean sea level or that are less than
                    300 feet measured horizontally from the top of the
                    power pool.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) Management of excluded parcels.--
                    Management of the excluded parcels shall continue in
                    accordance with the terms of Army License No. DACW21-3-
                    85-1904 until the Secretary and the State enter into an
                    agreement under subparagraph (F).</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (C) Survey.--The exact acreage and legal
                    description of the land shall be determined by a survey
                    satisfactory to the Secretary, with the cost of the
                    survey borne by the State.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) Costs of conveyance.--The State shall be
            responsible for all costs, including real estate transaction
            and environmental compliance costs, associated with the
            conveyance.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (4) Perpetual status.--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) In general.--All land conveyed under
                    this paragraph shall be retained in public ownership
                    and shall be managed in perpetuity for fish and
                    wildlife mitigation purposes in accordance with a plan
                    approved by the Secretary.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) Reversion.--If any parcel of land is
                    not managed for fish and wildlife mitigation purposes
                    in accordance with the plan, title to the parcel shall
                    revert to the United States.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (5) Additional terms and conditions.--The
            Secretary may require such additional terms and conditions in
            connection with the conveyance as the Secretary considers
            appropriate to protect the interests of the United
            States.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (6) Fish and wildlife mitigation agreement.--
            </DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) In general.--The Secretary may pay the
                    State of South Carolina not more than $4,850,000
                    subject to the Secretary and the State entering into a
                    binding agreement for the State to manage for fish and
                    wildlife mitigation purposes in perpetuity the lands
                    conveyed under this paragraph and excluded parcels
                    designated in Exhibit A of Army License No. DACW21-3-
                    85-1904.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) Failure of performance.--The agreement
                    shall specify the terms and conditions under which
                    payment will be made and the rights of, and remedies
                    available to, the Federal Government to recover all or
                    a portion of the payment if the State fails to manage
                    any parcel in a manner satisfactory to the
                    Secretary.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (r) Land Conveyance, Clarkston, Washington.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the
            Port of Clarkston, Washington, all right, title, and interest
            of the United States in and to a portion of the land described
            in the Department of the Army lease No. DACW68-1-97-22,
            consisting of approximately 31 acres, the exact boundaries of
            which shall be determined by the Secretary and the Port of
            Clarkston.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Additional land.--The Secretary may convey to
            the Port of Clarkston, Washington, at fair market value as
            determined by the Secretary, such additional land located in
            the vicinity of Clarkston, Washington, as the Secretary
            determines to be excess to the needs of the Columbia River
            Project and appropriate for conveyance.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) Terms and conditions.--The conveyances made
            under subsections (a) and (b) shall be subject to such terms
            and conditions as the Secretary determines to be necessary to
            protect the interests of the United States, including a
            requirement that the Port of Clarkston pay all administrative
            costs associated with the conveyances, including the cost of
            land surveys and appraisals and costs associated with
            compliance with applicable environmental laws (including
            regulations).</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (4) Use of land.--The Port of Clarkston shall be
            required to pay the fair market value, as determined by the
            Secretary, of any land conveyed pursuant to subsection (a) that
            is not retained in public ownership or is used for other than
            public park or recreation purposes, except that the Secretary
            shall have a right of reverter to reclaim possession and title
            to any such land.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (s) White River, Indiana.--The project for flood control,
    Indianapolis on West Fork of the White River, Indiana, authorized by
    section 5 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of
    certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and other
    purposes'', approved June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1586, chapter 688), as
    modified by section 323 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996
    (110 Stat. 3716), is modified to authorize the Secretary to undertake
    the riverfront alterations described in the Central Indianapolis
    Waterfront Concept Plan, dated February 1994, for the Canal Development
    (Upper Canal feature) and the Beveridge Paper feature, at a total cost
    not to exceed $25,000,000, of which $12,500,000 is the estimated
    Federal cost and $12,500,000 is the estimated non-Federal cost, except
    that no such alterations may be undertaken unless the Secretary
    determines that the alterations authorized by this subsection, in
    combination with the alterations undertaken under section 323 of the
    Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3716), are
    economically justified.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (t) Fox Point Hurricane Barrier, Providence, Rhode
    Island.--The project for hurricane-flood protection, Fox Point,
    Providence, Rhode Island, authorized by section 203 of the Flood
    Control Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 306) is modified to direct the Secretary
    to undertake the necessary repairs to the barrier, as identified in the
    Condition Survey and Technical Assessment dated April 1998 with
    Supplement dated August 1998, at a total cost of $3,000,000, with an
    estimated Federal cost of $1,950,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost
    of $1,050,000.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 103. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    (a) Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut.--The portion of the
    project for navigation, Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by
    section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 297),
    consisting of a 2.4-acre anchorage area 9 feet deep and an adjacent
    0.60-acre anchorage area 6 feet deep, located on the west side of
    Johnsons River, Connecticut, is not authorized after the date of
    enactment of this Act.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (b) Bass Harbor, Maine.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) Deauthorization.--The portions of the project
            for navigation, Bass Harbor, Maine, authorized on May 7, 1962,
            under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33
            U.S.C. 577) described in paragraph (2) are not authorized after
    the date of enactment of this Act.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Description.--The portions of the project
            referred to in paragraph (1) are described as
            follows:</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) Beginning at a bend in the project,
                    N149040.00, E538505.00, thence running easterly about
                    50.00 feet along the northern limit of the project to a
                    point, N149061.55, E538550.11, thence running southerly
                    about 642.08 feet to a point, N148477.64, E538817.18,
                    thence running southwesterly about 156.27 feet to a
                    point on the westerly limit of the project, N148348.50,
                    E538737.02, thence running northerly about 149.00 feet
                    along the westerly limit of the project to a bend in
                    the project, N148489.22, E538768.09, thence running
                    northwesterly about 610.39 feet along the westerly
                    limit of the project to the point of origin.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) Beginning at a point on the westerly
                    limit of the project, N148118.55, E538689.05, thence
                    running southeasterly about 91.92 feet to a point,
                    N148041.43, E538739.07, thence running southerly about
                    65.00 feet to a point, N147977.86, E538725.51, thence
                    running southwesterly about 91.92 feet to a point on
                    the westerly limit of the project, N147927.84,
                    E538648.39, thence running northerly about 195.00 feet
                    along the westerly limit of the project to the point of
                    origin.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (c) Boothbay Harbor, Maine.--The project for navigation,
    Boothbay Harbor, Maine, authorized by the Act of July 25, 1912 (37
    Stat. 201, chapter 253), is not authorized after the date of enactment
    of this Act.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (d) East Boothbay Harbor, Maine.--Section 364 of the Water
    Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3731) is amended by
    striking paragraph (9) and inserting the following:</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(9) East boothbay harbor, maine.--The project
            for navigation, East Boothbay Harbor, Maine, authorized by the
            first section of the Act entitled `An Act making appropriations
            for the construction, repair, and preservation of certain
            public works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes',
            approved June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 657).''.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 104. STUDIES.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    (a) Caddo Levee, Red River Below Denison Dam, Arizona,
    Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to
    determine the feasibility of undertaking a project for flood control,
    Caddo Levee, Red River Below Denison Dam, Arizona, Louisiana, Oklahoma,
    and Texas, including incorporating the existing levee, along Twelve
    Mile Bayou from its juncture with the existing Red River Below Denison
    Dam Levee approximately 26 miles upstream to its terminus at high
    ground in the vicinity of Black Bayou, Louisiana.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (b) Fields Landing Channel, Humboldt Harbor, California.--
    The Secretary--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) shall conduct a study for the project for
            navigation, Fields Landing Channel, Humboldt Harbor and Bay,
            California, to a depth of minus 35 feet (MLLW), and for that
            purpose may use any feasibility report prepared by the non-
            Federal sponsor under section 203 of the Water Resources
            Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2231) for which
            reimbursement of the Federal share of the study is authorized
            subject to the availability of appropriations; and</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) may carry out the project under section 107 of
            the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), if the
            Secretary determines that the project is feasible.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (c) Strawberry Creek, Berkeley, California.--The Secretary
    shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of restoring
    Strawberry Creek, Berkeley, California, and the Federal interest in
    environmental restoration, conservation of fish and wildlife resources,
    recreation, and water quality.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (d) West Side Storm Water Retention Facility, City of
    Lancaster, California.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to
    determine the feasibility of undertaking measures to construct the West
    Side Storm Water Retention Facility in the city of Lancaster,
    California.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (e) Apalachicola River, Florida.--The Secretary shall
    conduct a study for the purpose of identifying--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) alternatives for the management of material
            dredged in connection with operation and maintenance of the
            Apalachicola River Navigation Project; and</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) alternatives that reduce the requirements for
            such dredging.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (f) Broward County, Sand Bypassing at Port Everglades,
    Florida.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the
    feasibility of constructing a sand bypassing project at the Port
    Everglades Inlet, Florida.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (g) City of Destin-Noriega Point Breakwater, Florida.--The
    Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of--
    </DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) restoring Noriega Point, Florida, to serve as
            a breakwater for Destin Harbor; and</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) including Noriega Point as part of the East
            Pass, Florida, navigation project.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (h) Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area, Florida.--
    </DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a
            study to determine the feasibility of undertaking measures to
            reduce the flooding problems in the vicinity of Gateway
            Triangle Redevelopment Area, Florida.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Studies and reports.--The study shall include
            a review and consideration of studies and reports completed by
            the non-Federal interests.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (i) City of Plant City, Florida.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a
            study to determine the feasibility of a flood control project
            in the city of Plant City, Florida.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Studies and reports.--In conducting the study,
            the Secretary shall review and consider studies and reports
            completed by the non-Federal interests.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (j) Goose Creek Watershed, Oakley, Idaho.--The Secretary
    shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of undertaking flood
    damage reduction, water conservation, ground water recharge, ecosystem
    restoration, and related purposes along the Goose Creek watershed near
    Oakley, Idaho.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (k) Acadiana Navigation Channel, Louisiana.--The Secretary
    shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of assuming
    operations and maintenance for the Acadiana Navigation Channel located
    in Iberia and Vermillion Parishes, Louisiana.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (l) Cameron Parish West of Calcasieu River, Louisiana.--
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of a
    storm damage reduction and ecosystem restoration project for Cameron
    Parish west of Calcasieu River, Louisiana.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (m) Beneficial Use of Dredged Material, Coastal
    Louisiana.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the
    feasibility of using dredged material from maintenance activities at
    Federal navigation projects in coastal Louisiana to benefit coastal
    areas in the State.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (n) Contraband Bayou Navigation Channel, Louisiana.--The
    Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of
    assuming the maintenance at Contraband Bayou, Calcasieu River Ship
    Canal, Louisiana.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (o) Golden Meadow Lock, Louisiana.--The Secretary shall
    conduct a study to determine the feasibility of converting the Golden
    Meadow floodgate into a navigation lock to be included in the Larose to
    Golden Meadow Hurricane Protection Project, Louisiana.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (p) Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Ecosystem Protection, Chef
    Menteur to Sabine River, Louisiana.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a
            study to determine the feasibility of undertaking ecosystem
            restoration and protection measures along the Gulf Intracoastal
            Waterway from Chef Menteur to Sabine River,
            Louisiana.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Matters to be addressed.--The study shall
            address saltwater intrusion, tidal scour, erosion, and other
            water resources related problems in that area.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (q) Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana, and Vicinity, St.
    Charles Parish Pumps.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine
    the feasibility of modifying the Lake Pontchartrain Hurricane
    Protection Project to include the St. Charles Parish Pumps and the
    modification of the seawall fronting protection along Lake
    Pontchartrain in Orleans Parish, from New Basin Canal on the west to
    the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal on the east.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (r) Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity Seawall Restoration,
    Louisiana.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the
    feasibility of undertaking structural modifications of that portion of
    the seawall fronting protection along the south shore of Lake
    Pontchartrain in Orleans Parish, Louisiana, extending approximately 5
    miles from the new basin Canal on the west to the Inner Harbor
    Navigation Canal on the east as a part of the Lake Pontchartrain and
    Vicinity Hurricane Protection Project, authorized by section 204 of the
    Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1077).</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (s) Detroit River, Michigan, Greenway Corridor Study.--
    </DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a
            study to determine the feasibility of a project for shoreline
            protection, frontal erosion, and associated purposes in the
            Detroit River shoreline area from the Belle Isle Bridge to the
            Ambassador Bridge in Detroit, Michigan.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Potential modifications.--As a part of the
            study, the Secretary shall review potential project
            modifications to any existing Corps projects within the same
            area.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (t) St. Clair Shores Flood Control, Michigan.--The
    Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of
    constructing a flood control project at St. Clair Shores,
    Michigan.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (u) Woodtick Peninsula, Michigan, and Toledo Harbor,
    Ohio.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility
    of utilizing dredged material from Toledo Harbor, Ohio, to provide
    erosion reduction, navigation, and ecosystem restoration at Woodtick
    Peninsula, Michigan.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (v) Tunica Lake Weir, Mississippi.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a
            study to determine the feasibility of constructing an outlet
            weir at Tunica Lake, Tunica County, Mississippi, and Lee
            County, Arkansas, for the purpose of stabilizing water levels
            in the Lake.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Economic analysis.--In carrying out the study,
            the Secretary shall include as a part of the economic analysis
            the benefits derived from recreation uses at the Lake and
            economic benefits associated with restoration of fish and
            wildlife habitat.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (w) Protective Facilities for the St. Louis, Missouri,
    Riverfront Area.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to
            determine the optimal plan to protect facilities that are
            located on the Mississippi River riverfront within the
            boundaries of St. Louis, Missouri.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Requirements.--In conducting the study, the
            Secretary shall--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) evaluate alternatives to offer safety
                    and security to facilities; and</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) use state-of-the-art techniques to
                    best evaluate the current situation, probable
                    solutions, and estimated costs.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) Report.--Not later than April 15, 1999, the
            Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the results of
            the study.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (x) Yellowstone River, Montana.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a
            comprehensive study of the Yellowstone River from Gardiner,
            Montana to the confluence of the Missouri River to determine
            the hydrologic, biological, and socioeconomic cumulative
            impacts on the river.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Consultation and coordination.--The Secretary
            shall conduct the study in consultation with the United States
            Fish and Wildlife Service, the United States Geological Survey,
            and the Natural Resources Conservation Service and with the
            full participation of the State of Montana and tribal and local
            entities, and provide for public participation.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) Report.--Not later than 5 years after the date
            of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit a report
            to Congress on the results of the study.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (y) Las Vegas Valley, Nevada.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a
            comprehensive study of water resources located in the Las Vegas
            Valley, Nevada.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Objectives.--The study shall identify problems
            and opportunities related to ecosystem restoration, water
            quality, particularly the quality of surface runoff, water
            supply, and flood control.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (z) Oswego River Basin, New York.--The Secretary shall
    conduct a study to determine the feasibility of establishing a flood
    forecasting system within the Oswego River basin, New York.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (aa) Port of New York-New Jersey Navigation Study and
    Environmental Restoration Study.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) Navigation study.--The Secretary shall conduct
            a comprehensive study of navigation needs at the Port of New
            York-New Jersey (including the South Brooklyn Marine and Red
            Hook Container Terminals, Staten Island, and adjacent areas) to
            address improvements, including deepening of existing channels
            to depths of 50 feet or greater, that are required to provide
            economically efficient and environmentally sound navigation to
            meet current and future requirements.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Environmental restoration study.--The
            Secretary, acting through the Chief of Engineers, shall review
            the report of the Chief of Engineers on the New York Harbor,
            printed in the House Management Plan of the Harbor Estuary
            Program, and other pertinent reports concerning the New York
            Harbor Region and the Port of New York-New Jersey, to determine
            the Federal interest in advancing harbor environmental
            restoration.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) Report.--The Secretary may use funds from the
            ongoing navigation study for New York and New Jersey Harbor to
            complete a reconnaissance report for environmental restoration
            by December 31, 1999. The navigation study to deepen New York
            and New Jersey Harbor shall consider beneficial use of dredged
            material.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (bb) Bank Stabilization, Missouri River, North Dakota.--
    </DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) Study.--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) In general.--The Secretary shall
                    conduct a study to determine the feasibility of bank
                    stabilization on the Missouri River between the
                    Garrison Dam and Lake Oahe in North Dakota.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) Elements.--In conducting the study,
                    the Secretary shall study--</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (i) options for stabilizing the
                            erosion sites on the banks of the Missouri
                            River between the Garrison Dam and Lake Oahe
                            identified in the report developed by the North
                            Dakota State Water Commission, dated December
                            1997, including stabilization through
                            nontraditional measures;</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (ii) the cumulative impact of bank
                            stabilization measures between the Garrison Dam
                            and Lake Oahe on fish and wildlife habitat and
                            the potential impact of additional
                            stabilization measures, including the impact of
                            nontraditional stabilization
                            measures;</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (iii) the current and future
                            effects, including economic and fish and
                            wildlife habitat effects, that bank erosion is
                            having on creating the delta at the beginning
                            of Lake Oahe; and</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (iv) the impact of taking no
                            additional measures to stabilize the banks of
                            the Missouri River between the Garrison Dam and
                            Lake Oahe.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (C) Interested parties.--In conducting the
                    study, the Secretary shall, to the maximum extent
                    practicable, seek the participation and views of
                    interested Federal, State, and local agencies,
                    landowners, conservation organizations, and other
                    persons.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (D) Report.--</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (i) In general.--The Secretary
                            shall report to Congress on the results of the
                            study not later than 1 year after the date of
                            enactment of this Act.</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (ii) Status.--If the Secretary
                            cannot complete the study and report to
                            Congress by the day that is 1 year after the
                            date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary
                            shall, by that day, report to Congress on the
                            status of the study and report, including an
                            estimate of the date of completion.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Effect on existing projects.--This subsection
            does not preclude the Secretary from establishing or carrying
            out a stabilization project that is authorized by
            law.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (cc) Cleveland Harbor, Cleveland, Ohio.--The Secretary
    shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of undertaking
    repairs and related navigation improvements at Dike 14, Cleveland,
    Ohio.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (dd) East Lake, Vermillion and Chagrin, Ohio.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a
            study to determine the feasibility of undertaking flood damage
            reduction at East Lake, Vermillion and Chagrin, Ohio.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Ice retention structure.--In conducting the
            study, the Secretary may consider construction of an ice
            retention structure as a potential means of providing flood
            damage reduction.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (ee) Toussaint River, Carroll Township, Ohio.--The
    Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of
    undertaking navigation improvements at Toussaint River, Carroll
    Township, Ohio.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (ff) Santee Delta Wetland Habitat, South Carolina.--Not
    later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the
    Secretary shall complete a comprehensive study of the ecosystem in the
    Santee Delta focus area of South Carolina to determine the feasibility
    of undertaking measures to enhance the wetland habitat in the
    area.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (gg) Waccamaw River, South Carolina.--The Secretary shall
    conduct a study to determine the feasibility of a flood control project
    for the Waccamaw River in Horry County, South Carolina.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (hh) Upper Susquehanna-Lackawanna, Pennsylvania, Watershed
    Management and Restoration Study.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a
            study to determine the feasibility of a comprehensive flood
            plain management and watershed restoration project for the
            Upper Susquehanna-Lackawanna Watershed, Pennsylvania.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Geographic information system.--In conducting
            the study, the Secretary shall use a geographic information
            system.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) Plans.--The study shall formulate plans for
            comprehensive flood plain management and environmental
            restoration.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (4) Crediting.--Non-Federal interests may receive
            credit for in-kind services and materials that contribute to
            the study. The Secretary may credit non-Corps Federal
            assistance provided to the non-Federal interest toward the non-
            Federal share of study costs to the maximum extent authorized
            by law.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (ii) Niobrara River and Missouri River Sedimentation
    Study, South Dakota.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the
    Niobrara River watershed and the operations of Fort Randall Dam and
    Gavins Point Dam on the Missouri River to determine the feasibility of
    alleviating the bank erosion, sedimentation, and related problems in
    the lower Niobrara River and the Missouri River below Fort Randall
    Dam.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (jj) Santa Clara River, Utah.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a
            study to determine the feasibility of undertaking measures to
            alleviate damage caused by flooding, bank erosion, and
            sedimentation along the watershed of the Santa Clara River,
            Utah, above the Gunlock Reservoir.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Contents.--The study shall include an analysis
            of watershed conditions and water quality, as related to
            flooding and bank erosion, along the Santa Clara River in the
            vicinity of the town of Gunlock, Utah.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (kk) Agat Small Boat Harbor, Guam.--The Secretary shall
    conduct a study to determine the feasibility of undertaking the repair
    and reconstruction of Agat Small Boat Harbor, Guam, including the
    repair of existing shore protection measures and construction or a
    revetment of the breakwater seawall.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (ll) Apra Harbor Seawall, Guam.--The Secretary shall
    conduct a study to determine the feasibility of undertaking measures to
    repair, upgrade, and extend the seawall protecting Apra Harbor, Guam,
    and to ensure continued access to the harbor via Route 11B.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (mm) Apra Harbor Fuel Piers, Guam.--The Secretary shall
    conduct a study to determine the feasibility of undertaking measures to
    upgrade the piers and fuel transmission lines at the fuel piers in the
    Apra Harbor, Guam, and measures to provide for erosion control and
    protection against storm damage.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (nn) Maintenance Dredging of Harbor Piers, Guam.--The
    Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of Federal
    maintenance of areas adjacent to piers at harbors in Guam, including
    Apra Harbor, Agat Harbor, and Agana Marina.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (oo) Alternative Water Sources Study.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) In general.--The Administrator of the
            Environmental Protection Agency shall conduct a study of the
            water supply needs of States that are not currently eligible
            for assistance under title XVI of the Reclamation Projects
            Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. 390h et
            seq.).</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Requirements.--The study shall--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) identify the water supply needs
                    (including potable, commercial, industrial,
                    recreational and agricultural needs) of each State
                    described in paragraph (1) through 2020, making use of
    such State, regional, and local plans, studies, and reports as are
    available;</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) evaluate the feasibility of various
                    alternative water source technologies such as reuse and
                    reclamation of wastewater and stormwater (including
                    indirect potable reuse), aquifer storage and recovery,
                    and desalination to meet the anticipated water supply
                    needs of the States; and</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (C) assess how alternative water sources
                    technologies can be utilized to meet the identified
                    needs.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) Report.--The Administrator shall report to
            Congress on the results of the study not more than 180 days
            after the date of enactment of this Act.</DELETED>

                <DELETED>TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 201. FLOOD HAZARD MITIGATION AND RIVERINE ECOSYSTEM
                  RESTORATION PROGRAM.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    (a) In General.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) Authorization.--The Secretary may carry out a
            program to reduce flood hazards and restore the natural
            functions and values of riverine ecosystems throughout the
            United States.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Studies.--In carrying out the program, the
            Secretary shall conduct studies to identify appropriate flood
            damage reduction, conservation, and restoration measures and
            may design and implement watershed management and restoration
            projects.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) Participation.--The studies and projects
            carried out under the program shall be conducted, to the extent
            practicable, with the full participation of the appropriate
            Federal agencies, including the Department of Agriculture, the
            Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Department of the
            Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the
            Department of Commerce.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (4) Nonstructural approaches.--The studies and
            projects shall, to the extent practicable, emphasize
            nonstructural approaches to preventing or reducing flood
            damages.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (b) Cost-Sharing Requirements.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) Studies.--The cost of studies conducted under
            subsection (a) shall be shared in accordance with section 105
            of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 Stat.
            2215).</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Projects.--The non-Federal interests shall pay
            35 percent of the cost of any project carried out under this
            section.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) In-kind contributions.--The non-Federal
            interests shall provide all land, easements, rights-of-way,
            dredged material disposal areas, and relocations necessary for
            the projects. The value of the land, easements, rights-of-way,
            dredged material disposal areas, and relocations shall be
            credited toward the payment required under this
            subsection.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (4) Responsibilities of the non-federal
            interests.--The non-Federal interests shall be responsible for
            all costs associated with operating, maintaining, replacing,
            repairing, and rehabilitating all projects carried out under
            this section.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (c) Project Justification.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) In general.--The Secretary may implement a
            project under this section if the Secretary determines that the
            project--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) will significantly reduce potential
                    flood damages;</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) will improve the quality of the
                    environment; and</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (C) is justified considering all costs and
                    beneficial outputs of the project.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Selection criteria; policies and procedures.--
            Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this
            Act, the Secretary shall--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) develop criteria for selecting and
                    rating the projects to be carried out as part of the
                    program authorized by this section; and</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) establish policies and procedures for
                    carrying out the studies and projects undertaken under
                    this section.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (d) Reporting Requirement.--The Secretary may not
    implement a project under this section until--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) the Secretary provides to the Committee on
            Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on
            Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
            Representatives a written notification describing the project
            and the determinations made under subsection (c); and</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) a period of 21 calendar days has expired
            following the date on which the notification was received by
            the Committees.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (e) Priority Areas.--In carrying out this section, the
    Secretary shall examine the potential for flood damage reductions at
    appropriate locations, including--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) Le May, Missouri;</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) the upper Delaware River basin, New
            York;</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) Tillamook County, Oregon;</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (4) Providence County, Rhode Island; and</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (5) Willamette River basin, Oregon.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (f) Per-Project Limitation.--Not more than $25,000,000 in
    Army Civil Works appropriations may be expended on any single project
    undertaken under this section.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) In general.--There is authorized to be
            appropriated to carry out this section $75,000,000 for the
            period of fiscal years 2000 and 2001.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Program funding levels.--All studies and
            projects undertaken under this authority from Army Civil Works
            appropriations shall be fully funded within the program funding
            levels provided in this subsection.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 202. SHORE PROTECTION.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Section 103(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of
    1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(d)) is amended--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) by striking ``Costs of constructing'' and
            inserting the following:</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(1) Construction.--Costs of constructing'';
            and</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) by adding at the end the following:</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(2) Periodic nourishment.--In the case of a
            project authorized for construction after December 31, 1999, or
            for which a feasibility study is completed after that date, the
            non-Federal cost of the periodic nourishment of projects or
            measures for shore protection or beach erosion control shall be
            50 percent, except that--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    ``(A) all costs assigned to benefits to
                    privately owned shores (where use of such shores is
                    limited to private interests) or to prevention of
                    losses of private land shall be borne by non-Federal
                    interests; and</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    ``(B) all costs assigned to the protection
                    of federally owned shores shall be borne by the United
                    States.''.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 203. SMALL FLOOD CONTROL AUTHORITY.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C.
    701s) is amended--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) in the first sentence, by striking
            ``construction of small projects'' and inserting
            ``implementation of small structural and nonstructural
            projects''; and</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) in the third sentence, by striking
            ``$5,000,000'' and inserting ``$7,000,000''.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 204. USE OF NON-FEDERAL FUNDS FOR COMPILING AND
                  DISSEMINATING INFORMATION ON FLOODS AND FLOOD
                  DAMAGES.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Section 206(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C.
    709a(b)) is amended in the third sentence by inserting before the
    period at the end the following: ``, but the Secretary of the Army may
    accept funds voluntarily contributed by such entities for the purpose
    of expanding the scope of the services requested by the
    entities''.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 205. EVERGLADES AND SOUTH FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM
                  RESTORATION.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Subparagraphs (B) and (C)(i) of section 528(b)(3) of the
    Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3769) are amended by
    striking ``1999'' and inserting ``2000''.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 206. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Section 206(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of
    1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330(c)) is amended--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) by striking ``Construction'' and inserting the
            following:</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(1) In general.--Construction''; and</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) by adding at the end the following:</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(2) Nonprofit entities.--Notwithstanding section
            221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), for
            any project carried out under this section, a non-Federal
            interest may include a nonprofit entity, with the consent of
            the affected local government.''.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 207. BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED MATERIAL.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992
    (33 U.S.C. 2326) is amended by adding at the end the
    following:</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    ``(g) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221 of
    the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), for any project
    carried out under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a
    nonprofit entity, with the consent of the affected local
    government.''.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 208. VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS BY STATES AND POLITICAL
                  SUBDIVISIONS.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (33 U.S.C. 701h), is
    amended by inserting ``or environmental restoration'' after ``flood
    control''.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 209. RECREATION USER FEES.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    (a) Withholding of Amounts.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) In general.--During fiscal years 1999 through
            2002, the Secretary may withhold from the special account
            established under section 4(i)(1)(A) of the Land and Water
            Conservation Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 460l-6a(i)(1)(A)) 100
            percent of the amount of receipts above a baseline of
            $34,000,000 per each fiscal year received from fees imposed at
            recreation sites under the administrative jurisdiction of the
            Department of the Army under section 4(b) of that Act (16
            U.S.C. 460l-6a(b)).</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Use.--The amounts withheld shall be retained
            by the Secretary and shall be available, without further Act of
            appropriation, for expenditure by the Secretary in accordance
            with subsection (b).</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) Availability.--The amounts withheld shall
            remain available until September 30, 2005.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (b) Use of Amounts Withheld.--In order to increase the
    quality of the visitor experience at public recreational areas and to
    enhance the protection of resources, the amounts withheld under
    subsection (a) may be used only for--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) repair and maintenance projects (including
            projects relating to health and safety);</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) interpretation;</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) signage;</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (4) habitat or facility enhancement;</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (5) resource preservation;</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (6) annual operation (including fee
            collection);</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (7) maintenance; and</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (8) law enforcement related to public
            use.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (c) Availability.--Each amount withheld by the Secretary
    shall be available for expenditure, without further Act of
    appropriation, at the specific project from which the amount, above
    baseline, is collected.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 210. WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT STUDIES FOR THE PACIFIC
                  REGION.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Section 444 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996
    (110 Stat. 3747) is amended by striking ``interest of navigation'' and
    inserting ``interests of water resources development (including
    navigation, flood damage reduction, and environmental
    restoration)''.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 211. MISSOURI AND MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVERS ENHANCEMENT
                  PROJECT.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    (a) Definitions.--In this section:</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) Middle mississippi river.--The term ``middle
            Mississippi River'' means the reach of the Mississippi River
            from the mouth of the Ohio River (river mile 0, upper
            Mississippi River) to the mouth of the Missouri River (river
            mile 195).</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Missouri river.--The term ``Missouri River''
            means the main stem and floodplain of the Missouri River
            (including reservoirs) from its confluence with the Mississippi
            River at St. Louis, Missouri, to its headwaters near Three
            Forks, Montana.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) Project.--The term ``project'' means the
            project authorized by this section.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (b) Protection and Enhancement Activities.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) Plan.--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) Development.--Not later than 180 days
                    after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary
                    shall develop a plan for a project to protect and
                    enhance fish and wildlife habitat of the Missouri River
                    and the middle Mississippi River.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) Activities.--</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (i) In general.--The plan shall
                            provide for such activities as are necessary to
                            protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat
                            without adversely affecting--</DELETED>
                                    <DELETED>    (I) the water-related
                                    needs of the region surrounding the
                                    Missouri River and the middle
                                    Mississippi River, including flood
                                    control, navigation, recreation, and
                                    enhancement of water supply;
                                    and</DELETED>
                                    <DELETED>    (II) private property
                                    rights.</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (ii) Required activities.--The
                            plan shall include--</DELETED>
                                    <DELETED>    (I) modification and
                                    improvement of navigation training
                                    structures to protect and enhance fish
                                    and wildlife habitat;</DELETED>
                                    <DELETED>    (II) modification and
                                    creation of side channels to protect
                                    and enhance fish and wildlife
                                    habitat;</DELETED>
                                    <DELETED>    (III) restoration and
                                    creation of island fish and wildlife
                                    habitat;</DELETED>
                                    <DELETED>    (IV) creation of riverine
                                    fish and wildlife habitat;</DELETED>
                                    <DELETED>    (V) establishment of
                                    criteria for prioritizing the type and
                                    sequencing of activities based on cost-
                                    effectiveness and likelihood of
                                    success; and</DELETED>
                                    <DELETED>    (VI) physical and
                                    biological monitoring for evaluating
                                    the success of the project, to be
                                    performed by the River Studies Center
                                    of the United States Geological Survey
                                    in Columbia, Missouri.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Implementation of activities.--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) In general.--Using funds made
                    available to carry out this section, the Secretary
                    shall carry out the activities described in the
                    plan.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) Use of existing authority for
                    unconstructed features of the project.--Using funds
                    made available to the Secretary under other law, the
                    Secretary shall design and construct any feature of the
                    project that may be carried out using the authority of
                    the Secretary to modify an authorized project, if the
                    Secretary determines that the design and construction
                    will--</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (i) accelerate the completion of
                            activities to protect and enhance fish and
                            wildlife habitat of the Missouri River or the
                            middle Mississippi River; and</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (ii) be compatible with the
                            project purposes described in this
                            section.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (c) Integration of Other Activities.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) In general.--In carrying out the activities
            described in subsection (b), the Secretary shall integrate the
            activities with other Federal, State, and tribal
            activities.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) New authority.--Nothing in this section
            confers any new regulatory authority on any Federal or non-
            Federal entity that carries out any activity authorized by this
            section.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (d) Public Participation.--In developing and carrying out
    the plan and the activities described in subsection (b), the Secretary
    shall provide for public review and comment in accordance with
    applicable Federal law, including--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) providing advance notice of
            meetings;</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) providing adequate opportunity for public
            input and comment;</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) maintaining appropriate records; and</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (4) compiling a record of the proceedings of
            meetings.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (e) Compliance With Applicable Law.--In carrying out the
    activities described in subsections (b) and (c), the Secretary shall
    comply with any applicable Federal law, including the National
    Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (f) Cost Sharing.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of
            the cost of the project shall be 35 percent.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost
            of any 1 activity described in subsection (b) shall not exceed
            $5,000,000.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) Operation and maintenance.--The operation and
            maintenance of the project shall be a non-Federal
            responsibility.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized
    to be appropriated to pay the Federal share of the cost of carrying out
    activities under this section $30,000,000 for the period of fiscal
    years 2000 and 2001.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 212. OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    (a) Sand, Gravel, and Shell.--Section 8(k)(2)(B) of the
    Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337(k)(2)(B)) is amended
    in the second sentence by inserting before the period at the end the
    following: ``or any other non-Federal interest subject to an agreement
    entered into under section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42
    U.S.C. 1962d-5b)''.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (b) Reimbursement for Local Interests.--Any amounts paid
    by non-Federal interests for beach erosion control, hurricane
    protection, shore protection, or storm damage reduction projects as a
    result of an assessment under section 8(k) of the Outer Continental
    Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337(k)) shall be fully
    reimbursed.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 213. ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Section 312(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of
    1990 (33 U.S.C. 1272(f)) is amended by adding at the end the
    following:</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(6) Snake Creek, Bixby, Oklahoma.''.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 214. BENEFIT OF PRIMARY FLOOD DAMAGES AVOIDED INCLUDED IN
                  BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Section 308 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990
    (33 U.S.C. 2318) is amended--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) in the heading of subsection (a), by striking
            ``Benefit-Cost Analysis'' and inserting ``Elements Excluded
            From Cost-Benefit Analysis'';</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) by redesignating subsections (b) through (e)
            as subsections (c) through (f), respectively;</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) by inserting after subsection (a) the
            following:</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    ``(b) Elements Included in Cost-Benefit Analysis.--The
    Secretary shall include primary flood damages avoided in the benefit
    base for justifying Federal nonstructural flood damage reduction
    projects.''; and</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (4) in the first sentence of subsection (e) (as
            redesignated by paragraph (2)), by striking ``(b)'' and
            inserting ``(d)''.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 215. CONTROL OF AQUATIC PLANT GROWTH.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Section 104(a) of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (33
    U.S.C. 610(a)) is amended--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) by inserting ``Arundo dona,'' after ``water-
            hyacinth,''; and</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) by inserting ``tarmarix'' after
            ``melaleuca''.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 216. ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Section 219(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of
    1992 (106 Stat. 4835) is amended by adding at the end the
    following:</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(19) Lake tahoe, california and nevada.--
            Regional water system for Lake Tahoe, California and
            Nevada.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(20) Lancaster, california.--Fox Field
            Industrial Corridor water facilities, Lancaster,
            California.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(21) San ramon, california.--San Ramon Valley
            recycled water project, San Ramon, California.''.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 217. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT, RESTORATION, AND
                  DEVELOPMENT.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Section 503 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996
    (110 Stat. 3756) is amended--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) in subsection (d)--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) by striking paragraph (10) and
                    inserting the following:</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(10) Regional Atlanta Watershed, Atlanta,
            Georgia, and Lake Lanier of Forsyth and Hall Counties,
            Georgia.''; and</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) by adding at the end the
                    following:</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(14) Clear Lake watershed, California.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(15) Fresno Slough watershed,
            California.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(16) Hayward Marsh, Southern San Francisco Bay
            watershed, California.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(17) Kaweah River watershed,
            California.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(18) Lake Tahoe watershed, California and
            Nevada.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(19) Malibu Creek watershed,
            California.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(20) Truckee River basin, Nevada.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(21) Walker River basin, Nevada.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(22) Bronx River watershed, New York.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(23) Catawba River watershed, North
            Carolina.'';</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection
            (f); and</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) by inserting after subsection (d) the
            following:</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    ``(e) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b)
    of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any
    project undertaken under this section, with the consent of the affected
    local government, a non-Federal interest may include a nonprofit
    entity.''.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 218. LAKES PROGRAM.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Section 602(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of
    1986 (100 Stat. 4148) is amended--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) in paragraph (15), by striking ``and'' at the
            end;</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) in paragraph (16), by striking the period at
            the end; and</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) by adding at the end the following:</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(17) Clear Lake, Lake County, California,
            removal of silt and aquatic growth and development of a
            sustainable weed and algae management program;</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(18) Flints Pond, Hollis, New Hampshire, removal
            of excessive aquatic vegetation; and</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(19) Osgood Pond, Milford, New Hampshire,
            removal of excessive aquatic vegetation.''.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 219. SEDIMENTS DECONTAMINATION POLICY.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Section 405 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992
    (33 U.S.C. 2239 note; Public Law 102-580) is amended--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the
            following:</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(4) Practical end-use products.--Technologies
            selected for demonstration at the pilot scale shall result in
            practical end-use products.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(5) Assistance by the secretary.--The Secretary
            shall assist the project to ensure expeditious completion by
            providing sufficient quantities of contaminated dredged
            material to conduct the full-scale demonstrations to stated
            capacity.''; and</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) in subsection (c), by striking the first
            sentence and inserting the following: ``There is authorized to
            be appropriated to carry out this section a total of
            $22,000,000 to complete technology testing, technology
            commercialization, and the development of full scale processing
            facilities within the New York/New Jersey Harbor.''.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 220. DISPOSAL OF DREDGED MATERIAL ON BEACHES.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    (a) In General.--Section 145 of the Water Resources
    Development Act of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 426j) is amended in the first
    sentence by striking ``50'' and inserting ``35''.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (b) Great Lakes Basin.--The Secretary shall work with the
    State of Ohio, other Great Lakes States, and political subdivisions of
    the States to fully implement and maximize beneficial reuse of dredged
    material as provided under section 145 of the Water Resources
    Development Act of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 426j).</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 221. FISH AND WILDLIFE MITIGATION.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Section 906(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of
    1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283(e)) is amended by inserting after the second
    sentence the following: ``Not more than 80 percent of the non-Federal
    share of such first costs may be in kind, including a facility, supply,
    or service that is necessary to carry out the enhancement
    project.''.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 222. REIMBURSEMENT OF NON-FEDERAL INTEREST.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Section 211(e)(2)(A) of the Water Resources Development
    Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 701b-13(e)(2)(A)) is amended by striking
    ``subject to amounts being made available in advance in appropriations
    Acts'' and inserting ``subject to the availability of
    appropriations''.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 223. NATIONAL CONTAMINATED SEDIMENT TASK FORCE.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    (a) Definition of Task Force.--In this section, the term
    ``Task Force'' means the National Contaminated Sediment Task Force
    established by section 502 of the National Contaminated Sediment
    Assessment and Management Act (33 U.S.C. 1271 note; Public Law 102-
    580).</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (b) Convening.--The Secretary and the Administrator shall
    convene the Task Force not later than 90 days after the date of
    enactment of this Act.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (c) Reporting on Remedial Action.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the
            date of enactment of this Act, the Task Force shall submit to
            Congress a report on the status of remedial actions at aquatic
            sites in the areas described in paragraph (2).</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Areas.--The report under paragraph (1) shall
            address remedial actions in--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) areas of probable concern identified
                    in the survey of data regarding aquatic sediment
                    quality required by section 503(a) of the National
                    Contaminated Sediment Assessment and Management Act (33
                    U.S.C. 1271);</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) areas of concern within the Great
                    Lakes, as identified under section 118(f) of the
                    Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C.
                    1268(f));</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (C) estuaries of national significance
                    identified under section 320 of the Federal Water
                    Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1330);</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (D) areas for which remedial action has
                    been authorized under any of the Water Resources
                    Development Acts; and</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (E) as appropriate, any other areas where
                    sediment contamination is identified by the Task
                    Force.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) Activities.--Remedial actions subject to
            reporting under this subsection include remedial actions
            under--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) the Comprehensive Environmental
                    Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42
                    U.S.C. 9601 et seq.) or other Federal or State law
                    containing environmental remediation
                    authority;</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) any of the Water Resources Development
                    Acts;</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (C) section 404 of the Federal Water
                    Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344); or</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (D) section 10 of the Act of March 3, 1899
                    (30 Stat. 1151, chapter 425).</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (4) Contents.--The report under paragraph (1)
            shall provide, with respect to each remedial action described
            in the report, a description of--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) the authorities and sources of funding
                    for conducting the remedial action;</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) the nature and sources of the sediment
                    contamination, including volume and concentration,
                    where appropriate;</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (C) the testing conducted to determine the
                    nature and extent of sediment contamination and to
                    determine whether the remedial action is
                    necessary;</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (D) the action levels or other factors
                    used to determine that the remedial action is
                    necessary;</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (E) the nature of the remedial action
                    planned or undertaken, including the levels of
                    protection of public health and the environment to be
                    achieved by the remedial action;</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (F) the ultimate disposition of any
                    material dredged as part of the remedial
                    action;</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (G) the status of projects and the
                    obstacles or barriers to prompt conduct of the remedial
                    action; and</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (H) contacts and sources of further
                    information concerning the remedial action.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 224. GREAT LAKES BASIN PROGRAM.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    (a) Strategic Plans.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) In general.--Not later than 18 months after
            the date of enactment of this Act, and every 2 years
            thereafter, the Secretary shall report to Congress on a plan
            for programs of the Corps of Engineers in the Great Lakes
            basin.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Contents.--The plan shall include details of
            the projected environmental and navigational projects in the
            Great Lakes basin, including--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) navigational maintenance and
                    operations for commercial and recreational
                    vessels;</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) environmental restoration
                    activities;</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (C) water level maintenance
                    activities;</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (D) technical and planning assistance to
                    States and remedial action planning
                    committees;</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (E) sediment transport analysis, sediment
                    management planning, and activities to support
                    prevention of excess sediment loadings;</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (F) flood damage reduction and shoreline
                    erosion prevention;</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (G) all other activities of the Corps of
                    Engineers; and</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (H) an analysis of factors limiting use of
                    programs and authorities of the Corps of Engineers in
                    existence on the date of enactment of this Act in the
                    Great Lakes basin, including the need for new or
                    modified authorities.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (b) Great Lakes Biohydrological Information.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) Inventory.--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) In general.--Not later than 90 days
                    after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary
                    shall request each Federal agency that may possess
                    information relevant to the Great Lakes biohydrological
                    system to provide an inventory of all such information
                    in the possession of the agency.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) Relevant information.--For the purpose
                    of subparagraph (A), relevant information includes
                    information on--</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (i) ground and surface water
                            hydrology;</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (ii) natural and altered tributary
                            dynamics;</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (iii) biological aspects of the
                            system influenced by and influencing water
                            quantity and water movement;</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (iv) meteorological projections
                            and weather impacts on Great Lakes water
                            levels; and</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (v) other Great Lakes
                            biohydrological system data relevant to
                            sustainable water use management.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Report.--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) In general.--Not later than 18 months
                    after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary,
                    in consultation with the States, Indian tribes, and
                    Federal agencies, and after requesting information from
                    the provinces and the federal government of Canada,
                    shall--</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (i) compile the inventories of
                            information;</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (ii) analyze the information for
                            consistency and gaps; and</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (iii) submit to Congress, the
                            International Joint Commission, and the Great
                            Lakes States a report that includes
                            recommendations on ways to improve the
                            information base on the biohydrological
                            dynamics of the Great Lakes ecosystem as a
                            whole, so as to support environmentally sound
                            decisions regarding diversions and consumptive
                            uses of Great Lakes water.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) Recommendations.--The recommendations
                    in the report under subparagraph (A) shall include
                    recommendations relating to the resources and funds
                    necessary for implementing improvement of the
                    information base.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (C) Considerations.--In developing the
                    report under subparagraph (A), the Secretary, in
                    cooperation with the Secretary of State, the Secretary
                    of Transportation, and other relevant agencies as
                    appropriate, shall consider and report on the status of
                    the issues described and recommendations made in--
                    </DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (i) the Report of the
                            International Joint Commission to the
                            Governments of the United States and Canada
                            under the 1977 reference issued in 1985;
                            and</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (ii) the 1993 Report of the
                            International Joint Commission to the
                            Governments of Canada and the United States on
                            Methods of Alleviating Adverse Consequences of
                            Fluctuating Water Levels in the Great Lakes St.
                            Lawrence Basin.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (c) Great Lakes Recreational Boating.--Not later than 18
    months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall,
    using information and studies in existence on the date of enactment of
    this Act to the maximum extent practicable, and in cooperation with the
    Great Lakes States, submit to Congress a report detailing the economic
    benefits of recreational boating in the Great Lakes basin, particularly
    at harbors benefiting from operation and maintenance projects of the
    Corps of Engineers.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (d) Cooperation.--In undertaking activities under this
    section, the Secretary shall--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) encourage public participation; and</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) cooperate, and, as appropriate, collaborate,
            with Great Lakes States, tribal governments, and Canadian
            federal, provincial, tribal governments.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (e) Water Use Activities and Policies.--The Secretary may
    provide technical assistance to the Great Lakes States to develop
    interstate guidelines to improve the consistency and efficiency of
    State-level water use activities and policies in the Great Lakes
    basin.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (f) Cost Sharing.--The Secretary may seek and accept funds
    from non-Federal entities to be used to pay up to 25 percent of the
    cost of carrying out subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e).</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 225. PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE
                  ENVIRONMENT.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Section 1135(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of
    1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a(c)) is amended--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting
            the following:</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(1) In general.--The Secretary''; and</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) by adding at the end the following:</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(2) Control of sea lamprey.--Congress finds
            that--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    ``(A) the Great Lakes navigation system
                    has been instrumental in the spread of sea lamprey and
                    the associated impacts to its fishery; and</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    ``(B) the use of the authority under this
                    subsection for control of sea lamprey at any Great
                    Lakes basin location is appropriate.''.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 226. WATER QUALITY, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, RECREATION,
                  FISH AND WILDLIFE, FLOOD CONTROL, AND
                  NAVIGATION.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    (a) In General.--The Secretary may investigate, study,
    evaluate, and report on--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) water quality, environmental quality,
            recreation, fish and wildlife, flood control, and navigation in
            the western Lake Erie watershed, including the watersheds of
            the Maumee River, Ottawa River, and Portage River in the States
            of Indiana, Ohio, and Michigan; and</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) measures to improve water quality,
            environmental quality, recreation, fish and wildlife, flood
            control, and navigation in the western Lake Erie
            basin.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (b) Cooperation.--In carrying out studies and
    investigations under subsection (a), the Secretary shall cooperate with
    Federal, State, and local agencies and nongovernmental organizations to
    ensure full consideration of all views and requirements of all
    interrelated programs that those agencies may develop independently or
    in coordination with the Corps of Engineers.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 227. IRRIGATION DIVERSION PROTECTION AND FISHERIES
                  ENHANCEMENT ASSISTANCE.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    The Secretary may provide technical planning and design
    assistance to non-Federal interests and may conduct other site-specific
    studies to formulate and evaluate fish screens, fish passages devices,
    and other measures to decrease the incidence of juvenile and adult fish
    inadvertently entering into irrigation systems. Measures shall be
    developed in cooperation with Federal and State resource agencies and
    not impair the continued withdrawal of water for irrigation purposes.
    In providing such assistance priority shall be given based on the
    objectives of the Endangered Species Act, cost-effectiveness, and the
    potential for reducing fish mortality. Non-Federal interests shall
    agree by contract to contribute 50 percent of the cost of such
    assistance. Not more than one-half of such non-Federal contribution may
    be made by the provision of services, materials, supplies, or other in-
    kind services. No construction activities are authorized by this
    section. Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this
    section, the Secretary shall report to Congress on fish mortality
    caused by irrigation water intake devices, appropriate measures to
    reduce mortality, the extent to which such measures are currently being
    employed in the arid States, the construction costs associated with
    such measures, and the appropriate Federal role, if any, to encourage
    the use of such measures.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 228. SMALL STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECTS.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Section 3 of the Act of August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g),
    is amended by striking ``$2,000,000'' and inserting
    ``$3,000,000''.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 229. SHORE DAMAGE PREVENTION OR MITIGATION.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C.
    426(i)) is amended--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``The
            Secretary'' and inserting ``(a) In General.--The
            Secretary'';</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) in the second sentence, by striking ``The
            costs'' and inserting the following:</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    ``(b) Cost Sharing.--The costs'';</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) in the third sentence--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) by striking ``No such'' and inserting
                    the following:</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    ``(c) Requirement for Specific Authorization.--No such'';
    and</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) by striking ``$2,000,000'' and
                    inserting ``$5,000,000''; and</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (4) by adding at the end the following:</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    ``(d) Coordination.--The Secretary shall--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(1) coordinate the implementation of the
            measures under this section with other Federal and non-Federal
            shore protection projects in the same geographic area;
            and</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(2) to the extent practicable, combine
            mitigation projects with other shore protection projects in the
            same area into a comprehensive regional project.''.</DELETED>

            <DELETED>TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 301. DREDGING OF SALT PONDS IN THE STATE OF RHODE
                  ISLAND.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    The Secretary may acquire for the State of Rhode Island a
    dredge and associated equipment with the capacity to dredge
    approximately 100 cubic yards per hour for use by the State in dredging
    salt ponds in the State.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 302. UPPER SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN, PENNSYLVANIA AND NEW
                  YORK.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Section 567(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of
    1996 (110 Stat. 3787) is amended by adding at the end the
    following:</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(3) The Chemung River watershed, New York, at an
            estimated Federal cost of $5,000,000.''.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 303. SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Section 102 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996
    (110 Stat. 3668) is amended--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) by redesignating paragraphs (15) through (22)
            as paragraphs (16) through (23), respectively;</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) by inserting after paragraph (14) the
            following:</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(15) Repaupo creek and delaware river,
            gloucester county, new jersey.--Project for tidegate and levee
            improvements for Repaupo Creek and the Delaware River,
            Gloucester County, New Jersey.''; and</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) by adding at the end the following:</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(24) Irondequoit creek, new york.--Project for
            flood control, Irondequoit Creek watershed, New York.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(25) Tioga county, pennsylvania.--Project for
            flood control, Tioga River and Cowanesque River and their
            tributaries, Tioga County, Pennsylvania.''.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 304. SMALL NAVIGATION PROJECTS.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Section 104 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996
    (110 Stat. 3669) is amended--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) by redesignating paragraphs (9) through (12)
            as paragraphs (10) through (13), respectively; and</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) by inserting after paragraph (8) the
            following:</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(9) Fortescue inlet, delaware bay, new jersey.--
            Project for navigation for Fortescue Inlet, Delaware Bay, New
            Jersey.''.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 305. STREAMBANK PROTECTION PROJECTS.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    (a) Arctic Ocean, Barrow, Alaska.--The Secretary shall
    evaluate and, if justified under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of
    1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r), carry out storm damage reduction and coastal
    erosion measures at the town of Barrow, Alaska.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (b) Saginaw River, Bay City, Michigan.--The Secretary may
    construct appropriate control structures in areas along the Saginaw
    River in the city of Bay City, Michigan, under authority of section 14
    of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 Stat. 701r).</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (c) Yellowstone River, Billings, Montana.--The streambank
    protection project at Coulson Park, along the Yellowstone River,
    Billings, Montana, shall be eligible for assistance under section 14 of
    the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r).</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (d) Monongahela River, Point Marion, Pennsylvania.--The
    Secretary shall evaluate and, if justified under section 14 of the
    Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r), carry out streambank
    erosion control measures along the Monongahela River at the borough of
    Point Marion, Pennsylvania.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 306. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, SPRINGFIELD,
                  OREGON.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    (a) In General.--Under section 1135 of the Water Resources
    Development Act of 1990 (33 Stat. 2309a) or other applicable authority,
    the Secretary shall conduct measures to address water quality, water
    flows and fish habitat restoration in the historic Springfield, Oregon,
    millrace through the reconfiguration of the existing millpond, if the
    Secretary determines that harmful impacts have occurred as the result
    of a previously constructed flood control project by the Corps of
    Engineers.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (b) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share, excluding
    lands, easements, rights-of-way, dredged material disposal areas, and
    relocations, shall be 25 percent.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized
    to be appropriated to carry out this section $1,500,000.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 307. GUILFORD AND NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    The Secretary shall expeditiously complete the activities
    authorized under section 346 of the Water Resources Development Act of
    1992 (106 Stat. 4858), including activities associated with Sluice
    Creek in Guilford, Connecticut, and Lighthouse Point Park in New Haven,
    Connecticut.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 308. FRANCIS BLAND FLOODWAY DITCH.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    (a) Redesignation.--The project for flood control, Eight
    Mile Creek, Paragould, Arkansas, authorized by section 401(a) of the
    Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4112) and known as
    ``Eight Mile Creek, Paragould, Arkansas'', shall be known and
    designated as the ``Francis Bland Floodway Ditch''.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (b) Legal References.--Any reference in any law, map,
    regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to
    the project and creek referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to
    be a reference to the Francis Bland Floodway Ditch.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 309. CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER BASIN, FLORIDA.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Section 528(e)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act
    of 1996 (110 Stat. 3770) is amended in the first sentence by inserting
    before the period at the end the following: ``, including potential
    land acquisition in the Caloosahatchee River basin or other
    areas''.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 310. CUMBERLAND, MARYLAND, FLOOD PROJECT
                  MITIGATION.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    (a) In General.--The project for flood control and other
    purposes, Cumberland, Maryland, authorized by section 5 of the Act of
    June 22, 1936 (commonly known as the ``Flood Control Act of 1936'') (49
    Stat. 1574, chapter 688), is modified to authorize the Secretary to
    undertake, as a separate part of the project, restoration of the
    historic Chesapeake and Ohio Canal substantially in accordance with the
    Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historic Park, Cumberland, Maryland,
    Rewatering Design Analysis, dated February 1998, at a total cost of
    $15,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $9,750,000 and an
    estimated non-Federal cost of $5,250,000.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (b) In-Kind Services.--The non-Federal interest for the
    restoration project under subsection (a)--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) may provide all or a portion of the non-
            Federal share of project costs in the form of in-kind services;
            and</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) shall receive credit toward the non-Federal
            share of project costs for design and construction work
            performed by the non-Federal interest before execution of a
            project cooperation agreement and for land, easements, and
            rights-of-way required for the restoration and acquired by the
            non-Federal interest before execution of such an
            agreement.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (c) Operation and Maintenance.--The operation and
    maintenance of the restoration project under subsection (a) shall be
    the full responsibility of the National Park Service.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 311. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Section 5(b)(3)(C)(i) of the Act of August 13, 1946 (33
    U.S.C. 426h), is amended by inserting before the semicolon the
    following: ``, including the city of Miami Beach, Florida''.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 312. SARDIS RESERVOIR, OKLAHOMA.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall accept from the State
    of Oklahoma or an agent of the State an amount, as determined under
    subsection (b), as prepayment of 100 percent of the water supply cost
    obligation of the State under Contract No. DACW56-74-JC-0314 for water
    supply storage at Sardis Reservoir, Oklahoma.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (b) Determination of Amount.--The amount to be paid by the
    State of Oklahoma under subsection (a) shall be subject to adjustment
    in accordance with accepted discount purchase methods for Government
    properties as determined by an independent accounting firm designated
    by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (c) Effect.--Nothing in this section shall otherwise
    affect any of the rights or obligations of the parties to the contract
    referred to in subsection (a).</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 313. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ILLINOIS WATERWAY SYSTEM
                  NAVIGATION MODERNIZATION.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    (a) Findings.--Congress finds that--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) exports are necessary to ensure job creation
            and an improved standard of living for the people of the United
            States;</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) the ability of producers of goods in the
            United States to compete in the international marketplace
            depends on a modern and efficient transportation
            network;</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) a modern and efficient waterway system is a
            transportation option necessary to provide United States
    shippers a safe, reliable, and competitive means to win foreign markets
    in an increasingly competitive international marketplace;</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (4) the need to modernize is heightened because
            the United States is at risk of losing its competitive edge as
            a result of the priority that foreign competitors are placing
            on modernizing their own waterway systems;</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (5) growing export demand projected over the
            coming decades will force greater demands on the waterway
            system of the United States and increase the cost to the
            economy if the system proves inadequate to satisfy growing
            export opportunities;</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (6) the locks and dams on the upper Mississippi
            River and Illinois River waterway system were built in the
            1930s and have some of the highest average delays to commercial
            tows in the country;</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (7) inland barges carry freight at the lowest unit
            cost while offering an alternative to truck and rail
            transportation that is environmentally sound, is energy
            efficient, is safe, causes little congestion, produces little
            air or noise pollution, and has minimal social impact;
            and</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (8) it should be the policy of the Corps of
            Engineers to pursue aggressively modernization of the waterway
            system authorized by Congress to promote the relative
            competitive position of the United States in the international
            marketplace.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (b) Preconstruction Engineering and Design.--In accordance
    with the Upper Mississippi River-Illinois Waterway System Navigation
    Study, the Secretary shall proceed immediately to prepare engineering
    design, plans, and specifications for extension of locks 20, 21, 22,
    24, 25 on the Mississippi River and the LaGrange and Peoria Locks on
    the Illinois River, to provide lock chambers 110 feet in width and
    1,200 feet in length, so that construction can proceed immediately upon
    completion of studies and authorization of projects by
    Congress.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 314. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER MANAGEMENT.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Section 1103 of the Water Resources Development Act of
    1986 (33 U.S.C. 652) is amended--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) in subsection (e)--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) by striking ``(e)'' and all that
                    follows through the end of paragraph (2) and inserting
                    the following:</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    ``(e) Undertakings.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(1) In general.--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    ``(A) Authority.--The Secretary, in
                    consultation with the Secretary of the Interior and the
                    States of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and
                    Wisconsin, is authorized to undertake--</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    ``(i) a program for the planning,
                            construction, and evaluation of measures for
                            fish and wildlife habitat rehabilitation and
                            enhancement; and</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    ``(ii) implementation of a program
                            of long-term resource monitoring, computerized
                            data inventory and analysis, and applied
                            research.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    ``(B) Requirements for projects.--Each
                    project carried out under subparagraph (A)(i) shall--
                    </DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    ``(i) to the maximum extent
                            practicable, simulate natural river
                            processes;</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    ``(ii) include an outreach and
                            education component; and</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    ``(iii) on completion of the
                            assessment under subparagraph (D), address
                            identified habitat and natural resource
                            needs.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    ``(C) Advisory committee.--In carrying out
                    subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall create an
                    independent technical advisory committee to review
                    projects, monitoring plans, and habitat and natural
                    resource needs assessments.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    ``(D) Habitat and natural resource needs
                    assessment.--</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    ``(i) Authority.--The Secretary is
                            authorized to undertake a systemic, river
                            reach, and pool scale assessment of habitat and
                            natural resource needs to serve as a blueprint
                            to guide habitat rehabilitation and long-term
                            resource monitoring.</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    ``(ii) Data.--The habitat and
                            natural resource needs assessment shall, to the
                            maximum extent practicable, use data in
                            existence at the time of the
                            assessment.</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    ``(iii) Timing.--The Secretary
                            shall complete a habitat and natural resource
                            needs assessment not later than 3 years after
                            the date of enactment of this
                            subparagraph.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(2) Reports.--On December 31, 2005, in
            consultation with the Secretary of the Interior and the States
            of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin, the
            Secretary shall prepare and submit to Congress a report that--
            </DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    ``(A) contains an evaluation of the
                    programs described in paragraph (1);</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    ``(B) describes the accomplishments of
                    each program;</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    ``(C) includes results of a habitat and
                    natural resource needs assessment; and</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    ``(D) identifies any needed adjustments in
                    the authorization under paragraph (1) or the authorized
                    appropriations under paragraphs (3), (4), and
                    (5).'';</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) in paragraph (3)--</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (i) by striking ``paragraph
                            (1)(A)'' and inserting ``paragraph (1)(A)(i)'';
                            and</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (ii) by striking ``Secretary not
                            to exceed'' and all that follows and inserting
                            ``Secretary not to exceed $22,750,000 for each
                            of fiscal years 1999 through 2009.'';</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (C) in paragraph (4)--</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (i) by striking ``paragraph
                            (1)(B)'' and inserting ``paragraph
                            (1)(A)(ii)''; and</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (ii) by striking ``$7,680,000''
                            and all that follows and inserting
                            ``$10,420,000 for each of fiscal years 1999
                            through 2009.'';</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (D) by striking paragraphs (5) and (6) and
                    inserting the following:</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(5) Authorization of appropriations.--There is
            authorized to be appropriated to carry out paragraph (1)(C) not
            to exceed $350,000 for each of fiscal years 1999 through
            2009.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(6) Transfer of amounts.--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    ``(A) In general.--For each fiscal year
                    beginning after September 30, 1992, the Secretary, in
                    consultation with the Secretary of the Interior and the
                    States of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and
                    Wisconsin, may transfer appropriated amounts between
                    the programs under clauses (i) and (ii) of paragraph
                    (1)(A) and paragraph (1)(C).</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    ``(B) Apportionment of costs.--In carrying
                    out paragraph (1)(D), the Secretary may apportion the
                    costs equally between the programs authorized by
                    paragraph (1)(A).''; and</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (E) in paragraph (7)--</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (i) in subparagraph (A)--
                            </DELETED>
                                    <DELETED>    (I) by inserting ``(i)''
                                    after ``paragraph (1)(A)'';
                                    and</DELETED>
                                    <DELETED>    (II) by inserting before
                                    the period at the end the following:
                                    ``and, in the case of any project
                                    requiring non-Federal cost sharing, the
                                    non-Federal share of the cost of the
                                    project shall be 35 percent'';
                                    and</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (ii) in subparagraph (B), by
                            striking ``paragraphs (1)(B) and (1)(C) of this
                            subsection'' and inserting ``paragraph
                            (1)(A)(ii)'';</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) in subsection (f)(2)--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking
                    ``(A)''; and</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) by striking subparagraph (B);
                    and</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) by adding at the end the following:</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    ``(k) St. Louis Area Urban Wildlife Habitat.--The
    Secretary shall investigate and, if appropriate, carry out restoration
    of urban wildlife habitat, with a special emphasis on the establishment
    of greenways in the St. Louis, Missouri, area and surrounding
    communities.''.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 315. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR COLUMBIA AND
                  SNAKE RIVERS SALMON SURVIVAL.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Section 511 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996
    (16 U.S.C. 3301 note; Public Law 104-303) is amended by striking
    subsection (a) and all that follows and inserting the
    following:</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    ``(a) Salmon Survival Activities.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(1) In general.--In conjunction with the
            Secretary of Commerce and Secretary of the Interior, the
            Secretary shall accelerate ongoing research and development
            activities, and may carry out or participate in additional
            research and development activities, for the purpose of
            developing innovative methods and technologies for improving
            the survival of salmon, especially salmon in the Columbia/Snake
            River Basin.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(2) Accelerated activities.--Accelerated
            research and development activities referred to in paragraph
            (1) may include research and development related to--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    ``(A) impacts from water resources
                    projects and other impacts on salmon life
                    cycles;</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    ``(B) juvenile and adult salmon
                    passage;</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    ``(C) light and sound guidance
                    systems;</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    ``(D) surface-oriented collector
                    systems;</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    ``(E) transportation mechanisms;
                    and</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    ``(F) dissolved gas monitoring and
                    abatement.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(3) Additional activities.--Additional research
            and development activities referred to in paragraph (1) may
            include research and development related to--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    ``(A) studies of juvenile salmon survival
                    in spawning and rearing areas;</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    ``(B) estuary and near-ocean juvenile and
                    adult salmon survival;</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    ``(C) impacts on salmon life cycles from
                    sources other than water resources projects;</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    ``(D) cryopreservation of fish gametes and
                    formation of a germ plasm repository for threatened and
                    endangered populations of native fish; and</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    ``(E) other innovative technologies and
                    actions intended to improve fish survival, including
                    the survival of resident fish.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(4) Coordination.--The Secretary shall
            coordinate any activities carried out under this subsection
            with appropriate Federal, State, and local agencies, affected
            Indian tribes, and the Northwest Power Planning
            Council.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(5) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the
            date of enactment of this section, the Secretary shall submit
            to Congress a report on the research and development activities
            carried out under this subsection, including any
            recommendations of the Secretary concerning the research and
            development activities.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(6) Authorization of appropriations.--There is
            authorized to be appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out research
            and development activities under paragraph (3).</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    ``(b) Advanced Turbine Development.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(1) In general.--In conjunction with the
            Secretary of Energy, the Secretary shall accelerate efforts
            toward developing and installing in Corps of Engineers-operated
            dams innovative, efficient, and environmentally safe hydropower
            turbines, including design of fish-friendly turbines, for use
            on the Columbia/Snake River hydrosystem.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is
            authorized to be appropriated $35,000,000 to carry out this
            subsection.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    ``(c) Management of Predation on Columbia/Snake River
    System Native Fishes.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(1) Nesting avian predators.--In conjunction
            with the Secretary of Commerce and the Secretary of the
            Interior, and consistent with a management plan to be developed
            by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the Secretary
            shall carry out methods to reduce nesting populations of avian
            predators on dredge spoil islands in the Columbia River under
            the jurisdiction of the Secretary.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    ``(2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is
            authorized to be appropriated $1,000,000 to carry out research
            and development activities under this subsection.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    ``(d) Implementation.--Nothing in this section affects the
    authority of the Secretary to implement the results of the research and
    development carried out under this section or any other
    law.''.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 316. NINE MILE RUN HABITAT RESTORATION,
                  PENNSYLVANIA.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    The Secretary may credit against the non-Federal share
    such costs as are incurred by the non-Federal interests in preparing
    environmental and other preconstruction documentation for the habitat
    restoration project, Nine Mile Run, Pennsylvania, if the Secretary
    determines that the documentation is integral to the project.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 317. LARKSPUR FERRY CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    The Secretary shall work with the Secretary of
    Transportation on a proposed solution to carry out the project to
    maintain the Larkspur Ferry Channel, Larkspur, California, authorized
    by section 601(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100
    Stat. 4148).</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 318. COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD IMPACT-RESPONSE MODELING
                  SYSTEM.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    (a) In General.--The Secretary may study and implement a
    Comprehensive Flood Impact-Response Modeling System for the Coralville
    Reservoir and the Iowa River watershed, Iowa.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (b) Study.--The study shall include--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) an evaluation of the combined hydrologic,
            geomorphic, environmental, economic, social, and recreational
            impacts of operating strategies within the watershed;</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) creation of an integrated, dynamic flood
            impact model; and</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) the development of a rapid response system to
            be used during flood and emergency situations.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (c) Report to Congress.--Not later than 5 years after the
    date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit a report to
    Congress on the results of the study and modeling system and such
    recommendations as the Secretary determines to be
    appropriate.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized
    to be appropriated a total of $2,250,000 to carry out this
    section.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 319. STUDY REGARDING INNOVATIVE FINANCING FOR SMALL AND
                  MEDIUM-SIZED PORTS.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    (a) Study.--The Comptroller General of the United States
    shall conduct a study and analysis of various alternatives for
    innovative financing of future construction, operation, and maintenance
    of projects in small and medium-sized ports.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (b) Report.--Not later than 270 days after the date of
    enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the
    Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and Committee
    on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives
    and the results of the study and any related legislative
    recommendations for consideration by Congress.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 320. CANDY LAKE PROJECT, OSAGE COUNTY,
                  OKLAHOMA.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    (a) Definitions.--In this section:</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) Fair market value.--The term ``fair market
            value'' means the amount for which a willing buyer would
            purchase and a willing seller would sell a parcel of land, as
            determined by a qualified, independent land
            appraiser.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Previous owner of land.--The term ``previous
            owner of land'' means a person (including a corporation) that
            conveyed, or a descendant of a deceased individual who
            conveyed, land to the Corps of Engineers for use in the Candy
            Lake project in Osage County, Oklahoma.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the
            Secretary of the Army.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (b) Land Conveyances.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey, in
            accordance with this section, all right, title, and interest of
            the United States in and to the land acquired by the United
            States for the Candy Lake project in Osage County,
            Oklahoma.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Previous owners of land.--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) In general.--The Secretary shall give
                    a previous owner of land first option to purchase the
                    land described in paragraph (1).</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) Application.--</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (i) In general.--A previous owner
                            of land that desires to purchase the land
                            described in paragraph (1) that was owned by
                            the previous owner of land, or by the
                            individual from whom the previous owner of land
                            is descended, shall file an application to
                            purchase the land with the Secretary not later
                            than 180 days after the official date of notice
                            to the previous owner of land under subsection
                            (c).</DELETED>
                            <DELETED>    (ii) First to file has first
                            option.--If more than 1 application is filed
                            for a parcel of land described in paragraph
                            (1), first options to purchase the parcel of
                            land shall be allotted in the order in which
                            applications for the parcel of land were
                            filed.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (C) Identification of previous owners of
                    land.--As soon as practicable after the date of
                    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall, to the
                    extent practicable, identify each previous owner of
                    land.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (D) Consideration.--Consideration for land
                    conveyed under this subsection shall be the fair market
                    value of the land.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) Disposal.--Any land described in paragraph (1)
            for which an application has not been filed under paragraph
            (2)(B) within the applicable time period shall be disposed of
            in accordance with law.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (4) Extinguishment of easements.--All flowage
            easements acquired by the United States for use in the Candy
            Lake project in Osage County, Oklahoma, are
            extinguished.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (c) Notice.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) In general.--The Secretary shall notify--
            </DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) each person identified as a previous
                    owner of land under subsection (b)(2)(C), not later
                    than 90 days after identification, by United States
                    mail; and</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) the general public, not later than 90
                    days after the date of enactment of this Act, by
                    publication in the Federal Register.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Contents of notice.--Notice under this
            subsection shall include--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) a copy of this section;</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) information sufficient to separately
                    identify each parcel of land subject to this section;
                    and</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (C) specification of the fair market value
                    of each parcel of land subject to this
                    section.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (3) Official date of notice.--The official date of
            notice under this subsection shall be the later of--</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) the date on which actual notice is
                    mailed; or</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) the date of publication of the notice
                    in the Federal Register.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 321. SALCHA RIVER AND PILEDRIVER SLOUGH, FAIRBANKS,
                  ALASKA.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    The Secretary shall evaluate and, if justified under
    section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), carry
    out flood damage reduction measures along the lower Salcha River and on
    Piledriver Slough, from its headwaters at the mouth of the Salcha River
    to the Chena Lakes Flood Control Project, in the vicinity of Fairbanks,
    Alaska, to protect against surface water flooding.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 322. EYAK RIVER, CORDOVA, ALASKA.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    The Secretary shall evaluate and, if justified under
    section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), carry
    out flood damage reduction measures along the Eyak River at the town of
    Cordova, Alaska.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 323. NORTH PADRE ISLAND STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION AND
                  ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION PROJECT.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    The Secretary shall carry out a project for ecosystem
    restoration and storm damage reduction at North Padre Island, Corpus
    Christi Bay, Texas, at a total estimated cost of $30,000,000, with an
    estimated Federal cost of $19,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost
    of $10,500,000, if the Secretary finds that the work is technically
    sound, environmentally acceptable, and economically
    justified.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 324. KANOPOLIS LAKE, KANSAS.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    (a) Water Supply.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the
            date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in cooperation
            with the State of Kansas or another non-Federal interest, shall
            complete a water supply reallocation study at the project for
            flood control, Kanopolis Lake, Kansas, as a basis on which the
            Secretary shall enter into negotiations with the State of
            Kansas or another non-Federal interest for the terms and
            conditions of a reallocation of the water supply.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Options.--The negotiations for storage
            reallocation shall include the following options for evaluation
            by all parties:</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (A) Financial terms of storage
                    reallocation.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (B) Protection of future Federal water
                    releases from Kanopolis Dam, consistent with State
                    water law, to ensure that the benefits expected from
                    releases are provided.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (C) Potential establishment of a water
                    assurance district consistent with other such districts
                    established by the State of Kansas.</DELETED>
                    <DELETED>    (D) Protection of existing project
                    purposes at Kanopolis Dam to include flood control,
                    recreation, and fish and wildlife.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (b) In-Kind Credit.--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) In general.--The Secretary may negotiate a
            credit for a portion of the financial repayment to the Federal
            Government for work performed by the State of Kansas, or
            another non-Federal interest, on land adjacent or in close
            proximity to the project, if the work provides a benefit to the
            project.</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) Work included.--The work for which credit may
            be granted may include watershed protection and enhancement,
            including wetland construction and ecosystem
            restoration.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 325. NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Section 552(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of
    1996 (110 Stat. 3780) is amended by striking ``for the project to be
    carried out with such assistance'' and inserting ``, or a public entity
    designated by the State director, to carry out the project with such
    assistance, subject to the project's meeting the certification
    requirement of subsection (c)(1)''.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 326. CITY OF CHARLEVOIX REIMBURSEMENT,
                  MICHIGAN.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    The Secretary shall review and, if consistent with
    authorized project purposes, reimburse the city of Charlevoix,
    Michigan, for the Federal share of costs associated with construction
    of the new revetment connection to the Federal navigation project at
    Charlevoix Harbor, Michigan.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 327. HAMILTON DAM FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT,
                  MICHIGAN.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    The Secretary may construct the Hamilton Dam flood control
    project, Michigan, under authority of section 205 of the Flood Control
    Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 328. HOLES CREEK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, OHIO.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of
    law, the non-Federal share of project costs for the project for flood
    control, Holes Creek, Ohio, shall not exceed the sum of--</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (1) the total amount projected as the non-Federal
            share as of September 30, 1996, in the Project Cooperation
            Agreement executed on that date; and</DELETED>
            <DELETED>    (2) 100 percent of the amount of any increases in
            the cost of the locally preferred plan over the cost estimated
            in the Project Cooperation Agreement.</DELETED>
    <DELETED>    (b) Reimbursement.--The Secretary shall reimburse the non-
    Federal interest any amount paid by the non-Federal interest in excess
    of the non-Federal share.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>SEC. 329. OVERFLOW MANAGEMENT FACILITY, RHODE
                  ISLAND.</DELETED>

    <DELETED>    Section 585(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of
    1996 (110 Stat. 3791) is amended by striking ``river'' and inserting
    ``sewer''.</DELETED>

    SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

        (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water Resources
    Development Act of 1999''.
        (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents of this Act is as
    follows:

    Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
    Sec. 2. Definition of Secretary.

                       TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

    Sec. 101. Project authorizations.
    Sec. 102. Project modifications.
    Sec. 103. Project deauthorizations.
    Sec. 104. Studies.

                          TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

    Sec. 201. Flood hazard mitigation and riverine ecosystem restoration
                                program.
    Sec. 202. Shore protection.
    Sec. 203. Small flood control authority.
    Sec. 204. Use of non-Federal funds for compiling and disseminating
                                information on floods and flood damages.
    Sec. 205. Aquatic ecosystem restoration.
    Sec. 206. Beneficial uses of dredged material.
    Sec. 207. Voluntary contributions by States and political subdivisions.
    Sec. 208. Recreation user fees.
    Sec. 209. Water resources development studies for the Pacific region.
    Sec. 210. Missouri and Middle Mississippi Rivers enhancement project.
    Sec. 211. Outer Continental Shelf.
    Sec. 212. Environmental dredging.
    Sec. 213. Benefit of primary flood damages avoided included in benefit-
                                cost analysis.
    Sec. 214. Control of aquatic plant growth.
    Sec. 215. Environmental infrastructure.
    Sec. 216. Watershed management, restoration, and development.
    Sec. 217. Lakes program.
    Sec. 218. Sediments decontamination policy.
    Sec. 219. Disposal of dredged material on beaches.
    Sec. 220. Fish and wildlife mitigation.
    Sec. 221. Reimbursement of non-Federal interest.
    Sec. 222. National Contaminated Sediment Task Force.
    Sec. 223. Great Lakes basin program.
    Sec. 224. Projects for improvement of the environment.
    Sec. 225. Water quality, environmental quality, recreation, fish and
                                wildlife, flood control, and navigation.
    Sec. 226. Irrigation diversion protection and fisheries enhancement
                                assistance.
    Sec. 227. Small storm damage reduction projects.
    Sec. 228. Shore damage prevention or mitigation.
    Sec. 229. Atlantic coast of New York.
    Sec. 230. Accelerated adoption of innovative technologies for
                                contaminated sediments.

                     TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

    Sec. 301. Dredging of salt ponds in the State of Rhode Island.
    Sec. 302. Upper Susquehanna River basin, Pennsylvania and New York.
    Sec. 303. Small flood control projects.
    Sec. 304. Small navigation projects.
    Sec. 305. Streambank protection projects.
    Sec. 306. Aquatic ecosystem restoration, Springfield, Oregon.
    Sec. 307. Guilford and New Haven, Connecticut.
    Sec. 308. Francis Bland Floodway Ditch.
    Sec. 309. Caloosahatchee River basin, Florida.
    Sec. 310. Cumberland, Maryland, flood project mitigation.
    Sec. 311. City of Miami Beach, Florida.
    Sec. 312. Sardis Reservoir, Oklahoma.
    Sec. 313. Upper Mississippi River and Illinois waterway system
                                navigation modernization.
    Sec. 314. Upper Mississippi River management.
    Sec. 315. Research and development program for Columbia and Snake
                                Rivers salmon survival.
    Sec. 316. Nine Mile Run habitat restoration, Pennsylvania.
    Sec. 317. Larkspur Ferry Channel, California.
    Sec. 318. Comprehensive Flood Impact-Response Modeling System.
    Sec. 319. Study regarding innovative financing for small and medium-
                                sized ports.
    Sec. 320. Candy Lake project, Osage County, Oklahoma.
    Sec. 321. Salcha River and Piledriver Slough, Fairbanks, Alaska.
    Sec. 322. Eyak River, Cordova, Alaska.
    Sec. 323. North Padre Island storm damage reduction and environmental
                                restoration project.
    Sec. 324. Kanopolis Lake, Kansas.
    Sec. 325. New York City watershed.
    Sec. 326. City of Charlevoix reimbursement, Michigan.
    Sec. 327. Hamilton Dam flood control project, Michigan.
    Sec. 328. Holes Creek flood control project, Ohio.
    Sec. 329. Overflow management facility, Rhode Island.
    Sec. 330. Anacostia River aquatic ecosystem restoration, District of
                                Columbia and Maryland.
    Sec. 331. Everglades and south Florida ecosystem restoration.

    SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SECRETARY.

        In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the
    Army.

                       TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

    SEC. 101. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

        (a) Projects With Chief's Reports.--The following projects for
    water resources development and conservation and other purposes are
    authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in
    accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, described in
    the respective reports designated in this section:
                (1) Sand point harbor, alaska.--The project for navigation,
            Sand Point Harbor, Alaska: Report of the Chief of Engineers
            dated October 13, 1998, at a total cost of $11,760,000, with an
            estimated Federal cost of $6,964,000 and an estimated non-
            Federal cost of $4,796,000.
                (2) Rio salado (salt river), arizona.--The project for
            environmental restoration, Rio Salado (Salt River), Arizona:
            Report of the Chief of Engineers dated August 20, 1998, at a
            total cost of $88,048,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
            $56,355,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $31,693,000.
                (3) Tucson drainage area, arizona.--The project for flood
            damage reduction, environmental restoration, and recreation,
            Tucson drainage area, Arizona: Report of the Chief of Engineers
            dated May 20, 1998, at a total cost of $29,900,000, with an
            estimated Federal cost of $16,768,000 and an estimated non-
            Federal cost of $13,132,000.
                (4) American river watershed, california.--
                        (A) In general.--The project for flood damage
                    reduction described as the Folsom Stepped Release Plan
                    in the Corps of Engineers Supplemental Information
                    Report for the American River Watershed Project,
                    California, dated March 1996, at a total cost of
                    $505,400,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
                    $329,300,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
                    $176,100,000.
                        (B) Implementation.--
                                (i) In general.--Implementation of the
                            measures by the Secretary pursuant to
                            subparagraph (A) shall be undertaken after
                            completion of the levee stabilization and
                            strengthening and flood warning features
                            authorized by section 101(a)(1) of the Water
                            Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat.
                            3662).
                                (ii) Folsom dam and reservoir.--The
                            Secretary may undertake measures at the Folsom
                            Dam and Reservoir authorized under subparagraph
                            (A) only after reviewing the design of such
                            measures to determine if modifications are
                            necessary to account for changed hydrologic
                            conditions and any other changed conditions in
                            the project area, including operational and
                            construction impacts that have occurred since
                            completion of the report referred to in
                            subparagraph (A). The Secretary shall conduct
                            the review and develop the modifications to the
                            Folsom Dam and Reservoir with the full
                            participation of the Secretary of the Interior.
                                (iii) Remaining downstream elements.--
                                        (I) In general.--Implementation of
                                    the remaining downstream elements
                                    authorized pursuant to subparagraph (A)
                                    may be undertaken only after the
                                    Secretary, in consultation with
                                    affected Federal, State, regional, and
                                    local entities, has reviewed the
                                    elements to determine if modifications
                                    are necessary to address changes in the
                                    hydrologic conditions, any other
                                    changed conditions in the project area
                                    that have occurred since completion of
                                    the report referred to in subparagraph
                                    (A) and any design modifications for
                                    the Folsom Dam and Reservoir made by
                                    the Secretary in implementing the
                                    measures referred to in clause (ii),
                                    and has issued a report on the review.
                                        (II) Principles and guidelines.--
                                    The review shall be prepared in
                                    accordance with the economic and
                                    environmental principles and guidelines
                                    for water and related land resources
                                    implementation studies, and no
                                    construction may be initiated unless
                                    the Secretary determines that the
                                    remaining downstream elements are
                                    technically sound, environmentally
                                    acceptable, and economically justified.
                (5) Llagas creek, california.--The project for completion
            of the remaining reaches of the Natural Resources Conservation
            Service flood control project at Llagas Creek, California,
            undertaken pursuant to section 5 of the Watershed Protection
            and Flood Prevention Act (16 U.S.C. 1005), substantially in
            accordance with the requirements of local cooperation as
            specified in section 4 of that Act (16 U.S.C. 1004) at a total
            cost of $45,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
            $21,800,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $23,200,000.
                (6) South sacramento county streams, california.--The
            project for flood control, environmental restoration, and
            recreation, South Sacramento County streams, California: Report
            of the Chief of Engineers dated October 6, 1998, at a total
            cost of $65,500,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
            $41,200,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $24,300,000.
                (7) Upper guadalupe river, california.--Construction of the
            locally preferred plan for flood damage reduction and
            recreation, Upper Guadalupe River, California, described as the
            Bypass Channel Plan of the Chief of Engineers dated August 19,
            1998, at a total cost of $137,600,000, with an estimated
            Federal cost of $44,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost
            of $93,600,000.
                (8) Yuba river basin, california.--The project for flood
            damage reduction, Yuba River Basin, California: Report of the
            Chief of Engineers dated November 25, 1998, at a total cost of
            $26,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $17,350,000 and
            an estimated non-Federal cost of $9,250,000.
                (9) Delaware bay coastline: delaware and new jersey-
            broadkill beach, delaware.--
                        (A) In general.--The project for hurricane and
                    storm damage reduction and shore protection, Delaware
                    Bay coastline: Delaware and New Jersey-Broadkill Beach,
                    Delaware, Report of the Chief of Engineers dated August
                    17, 1998, at a total cost of $9,049,000, with an
                    estimated Federal cost of $5,674,000 and an estimated
                    non-Federal cost of $3,375,000.
                        (B) Periodic nourishment.--Periodic nourishment is
                    authorized for a 50-year period at an estimated average
                    annual cost of $538,200, with an estimated annual
                    Federal cost of $349,800 and an estimated annual non-
                    Federal cost of $188,400.
                (10) Delaware bay coastline: delaware and new jersey-port
            mahon, delaware.--
                        (A) In general.--The project for ecosystem
                    restoration and shore protection, Delaware Bay
                    coastline: Delaware and New Jersey-Port Mahon,
                    Delaware: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated
                    September 28, 1998, at a total cost of $7,644,000, with
                    an estimated Federal cost of $4,969,000 and an
                    estimated non-Federal cost of $2,675,000.
                        (B) Periodic nourishment.--Periodic nourishment is
                    authorized for a 50-year period at an estimated average
                    annual cost of $234,000, with an estimated annual
                    Federal cost of $152,000 and an estimated annual non-
                    Federal cost of $82,000.
                (11) Hillsboro and okeechobee aquifer storage and recovery
            project, florida.--The project for aquifer storage and recovery
            described in the Corps of Engineers Central and Southern
            Florida Water Supply Study, Florida, dated April 1989, and in
            House Document 369, dated July 30, 1968, at a total cost of
            $27,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $13,500,000 and
            an estimated non-Federal cost of $13,500,000.
                (12) Indian river county, florida.--Notwithstanding section
            1001(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33
            U.S.C. 579a(a)), the project for shoreline protection, Indian
            River County, Florida, authorized by section 501(a) of that Act
            (100 Stat. 4134), shall remain authorized for construction
            through December 31, 2002.
                (13) Lido key beach, sarasota, florida.--
                        (A) In general.--The project for shore protection
                    at Lido Key Beach, Sarasota, Florida, authorized by
                    section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1970 (84
                    Stat. 1819) and deauthorized by operation of section
                    1001(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986
                    (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)), is authorized to be carried out by
                    the Secretary at a total cost of $5,200,000, with an
                    estimated Federal cost of $3,380,000 and an estimated
                    non-Federal cost of $1,820,000.
                        (B) Periodic nourishment.--Periodic nourishment is
                    authorized for a 50-year period at an estimated average
                    annual cost of $602,000, with an estimated annual
                    Federal cost of $391,000 and an estimated annual non-
                    Federal cost of $211,000.
                (14) Tampa harbor-big bend channel, florida.--The project
            for navigation, Tampa Harbor-Big Bend Channel, Florida: Report
            of the Chief of Engineers dated October 13, 1998, at a total
            cost of $12,356,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
            $6,235,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $6,121,000.
                (15) Brunswick harbor, georgia.--The project for
            navigation, Brunswick Harbor, Georgia: Report of the Chief of
            Engineers dated October 6, 1998, at a total cost of
            $50,717,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $32,966,000 and
            an estimated non-Federal cost of $17,751,000.
                (16) Beargrass creek, kentucky.--The project for flood
            damage reduction, Beargrass Creek, Kentucky: Report of the
            Chief of Engineers dated May 12, 1998, at a total cost of
            $11,172,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $7,262,000 and
            an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,910,000.
                (17) Amite river and tributaries, louisiana, east baton
            rouge parish watershed.--The project for flood damage reduction
            and recreation, Amite River and Tributaries, Louisiana, East
            Baton Rouge Parish Watershed: Report of the Chief of Engineers,
            dated December 23, 1996, at a total cost of $112,900,000, with
            an estimated Federal cost of $73,400,000 and an estimated non-
            Federal cost of $39,500,000.
                (18) Baltimore harbor anchorages and channels, maryland and
            virginia.--The project for navigation, Baltimore Harbor
            Anchorages and Channels, Maryland and Virginia: Report of the
            Chief of Engineers, dated June 8, 1998, at a total cost of
            $28,430,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $19,000,000 and
            an estimated non-Federal cost of $9,430,000.
                (19) Red lake river at crookston, minnesota.--The project
            for flood damage reduction, Red Lake River at Crookston,
            Minnesota: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated April 20,
            1998, at a total cost of $8,950,000, with an estimated Federal
            cost of $5,720,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
            $3,230,000.
                (20) New jersey shore protection, townsends inlet to cape
            may inlet, new jersey.--
                        (A) In general.--The project for hurricane and
                    storm damage reduction, ecosystem restoration, and
                    shore protection, New Jersey coastline, Townsends Inlet
                    to Cape May Inlet, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of
                    Engineers dated September 28, 1998, at a total cost of
                    $56,503,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
                    $36,727,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
                    $19,776,000.
                        (B) Periodic nourishment.--Periodic nourishment is
                    authorized for a 50-year period at an estimated average
                    annual cost of $2,000,000, with an estimated annual
                    Federal cost of $1,300,000 and an estimated annual non-
                    Federal cost of $700,000.
                (21) Park river, north dakota.--
                        (A) In general.--Subject to the condition stated in
                    subparagraph (B), the project for flood control, Park
                    River, Grafton, North Dakota, authorized by section
                    401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986
                    (100 Stat. 4121) and deauthorized under section 1001(a)
                    of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33
                    U.S.C. 579a), at a total cost of $28,100,000, with an
                    estimated Federal cost of $18,265,000 and an estimated
                    non-Federal cost of $9,835,000.
                        (B) Condition.--No construction may be initiated
                    unless the Secretary determines through a general
                    reevaluation report using current data, that the
                    project is technically sound, environmentally
                    acceptable, and economically justified.
                (22) Salt creek, graham, texas.--The project for flood
            control, environmental restoration, and recreation, Salt Creek,
            Graham, Texas: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated October
            6, 1998, at a total cost of $10,080,000, with an estimated
            Federal cost of $6,560,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
            $3,520,000.
        (b) Projects Subject to a Final Report.--The following projects for
    water resources development and conservation and other purposes are
    authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in
    accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions recommended in
    a final report of the Chief of Engineers as approved by the Secretary,
    if a favorable report of the Chief is completed not later than December
    31, 1999:
                (1) Nome harbor improvements, alaska.--The project for
            navigation, Nome Harbor Improvements, Alaska, at a total cost
            of $24,608,000, with an estimated first Federal cost of
            $19,660,000 and an estimated first non-Federal cost of
            $4,948,000.
                (2) Seward harbor, alaska.--The project for navigation,
            Seward Harbor, Alaska, at a total cost of $12,240,000, with an
            estimated first Federal cost of $4,364,000 and an estimated
            first non-Federal cost of $7,876,000.
                (3) Hamilton airfield wetland restoration, california.--The
            project for environmental restoration at Hamilton Airfield,
            California, at a total cost of $55,200,000, with an estimated
            Federal cost of $41,400,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost
            of $13,800,000.
                (4) Oakland, california.--
                        (A) In general.--The project for navigation and
                    environmental restoration, Oakland, California, at a
                    total cost of $214,340,000, with an estimated Federal
                    cost of $143,450,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost
                    of $70,890,000.
                        (B) Berthing areas and other local service
                    facilities.--The non-Federal interests shall provide
                    berthing areas and other local service facilities
                    necessary for the project at an estimated cost of
                    $42,310,000.
                (5) Delaware bay coastline: delaware and new jersey-
            roosevelt inlet-lewes beach, delaware.--
                        (A) In general.--The project for navigation
                    mitigation, shore protection, and hurricane and storm
                    damage reduction, Delaware Bay coastline: Delaware and
                    New Jersey-Roosevelt Inlet-Lewes Beach, Delaware, at a
                    total cost of $3,393,000, with an estimated Federal
                    cost of $2,620,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
                    $773,000.
                        (B) Periodic nourishment.--Periodic nourishment is
                    authorized for a 50-year period at an estimated average
                    annual cost of $196,000, with an estimated annual
                    Federal cost of $152,000 and an estimated annual non-
                    Federal cost of $44,000.
                (6) Delaware coast from cape henelopen to fenwick island,
            bethany beach/south bethany beach, delaware.--
                        (A) In general.--The project for hurricane and
                    storm damage reduction and shore protection, Delaware
                    Coast from Cape Henelopen to Fenwick Island, Bethany
                    Beach/South Bethany Beach, Delaware, at a total cost of
                    $22,205,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
                    $14,433,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
                    $7,772,000.
                        (B) Periodic nourishment.--Periodic nourishment is
                    authorized for a 50-year period at an estimated average
                    annual cost of $1,584,000, with an estimated annual
                    Federal cost of $1,030,000 and an estimated annual non-
                    Federal cost of $554,000.
                (7) Jacksonville harbor, florida.--The project for
            navigation, Jacksonville Harbor, Florida, at a total cost of
            $26,116,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $9,129,000 and
            an estimated non-Federal cost of $16,987,000.
                (8) Little talbot island, duval county, florida.--The
            project for hurricane and storm damage prevention and shore
            protection, Little Talbot Island, Duval County, Florida, at a
            total cost of $5,915,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
            $3,839,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,076,000.
                (9) Ponce de leon inlet, volusia county, florida.--The
            project for navigation and recreation, Ponce de Leon Inlet,
            Volusia County, Florida, at a total cost of $5,454,000, with an
            estimated Federal cost of $2,988,000 and an estimated non-
            Federal cost of $2,466,000.
                (10) Savannah harbor expansion, georgia.--
                        (A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B), the
                    Secretary may carry out the project for navigation,
                    Savannah Harbor expansion, Georgia, substantially in
                    accordance with the plans, and subject to the
                    conditions, recommended in a final report of the Chief
                    of Engineers, with such modifications as the Secretary
                    deems appropriate, at a total cost of $230,174,000 (of
                    which amount a portion is authorized for implementation
                    of the mitigation plan), with an estimated Federal cost
                    of $145,160,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
                    $85,014,000.
                        (B) Conditions.--The project authorized by
                    subparagraph (A) may be carried out only after--
                                (i) the Secretary, in consultation with
                            affected Federal, State, regional, and local
                            entities, has reviewed and approved an
                            Environmental Impact Statement that includes--
                                        (I) an analysis of the impacts of
                                    project depth alternatives ranging from
                                    42 feet through 48 feet; and
                                        (II) a selected plan for navigation
                                    and associated mitigation plan as
                                    required by section 906(a) of the Water
                                    Resources Development Act of 1986 (33
                                    U.S.C. 2283); and
                                (ii) the Secretary of the Interior, the
                            Secretary of Commerce, and the Administrator of
                            the Environmental Protection Agency, with the
                            Secretary, have approved the selected plan and
                            have determined that the mitigation plan
                            adequately addresses the potential
                            environmental impacts of the project.
                        (C) Mitigation requirements.--The mitigation plan
                    shall be implemented in advance of or concurrently with
                    construction of the project.
                (11) Turkey creek basin, kansas city, missouri and kansas
            city, kansas.--The project for flood damage reduction, Turkey
            Creek Basin, Kansas City, Missouri, and Kansas City, Kansas, at
            a total cost of $42,875,000 with an estimated Federal cost
    of $25,596,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $17,279,000.
                (12) Delaware bay coastline, oakwood beach, new jersey.--
                        (A) In general.--The project for hurricane and
                    storm damage reduction, Delaware Bay coastline, Oakwood
                    Beach, New Jersey, at a total cost of $3,380,000, with
                    an estimated Federal cost of $2,197,000 and an
                    estimated non-Federal cost of $1,183,000.
                        (B) Periodic nourishment.--Periodic nourishment is
                    authorized for a 50-year period at an estimated average
                    annual cost of $90,000, with an estimated annual
                    Federal cost of $58,000 and an estimated annual non-
                    Federal cost of $32,000.
                (13) Delaware bay coastline, reeds beach and pierces point,
            new jersey.--The project for environmental restoration,
            Delaware Bay coastline, Reeds Beach and Pierces Point, New
            Jersey, at a total cost of $4,057,000, with an estimated
            Federal cost of $2,637,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
            $1,420,000.
                (14) Delaware bay coastline, villas and vicinity, new
            jersey.--The project for environmental restoration, Delaware
            Bay coastline, Villas and vicinity, New Jersey, at a total cost
            of $7,520,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $4,888,000 and
            an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,632,000.
                (15) Lower cape may meadows, cape may point, new jersey.--
                        (A) In general.--The project for navigation
                    mitigation, ecosystem restoration, shore protection,
                    and hurricane and storm damage reduction, Lower Cape
                    May Meadows, Cape May Point, New Jersey, at a total
                    cost of $15,952,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
                    $12,118,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
                    $3,834,000.
                        (B) Periodic nourishment.--Periodic nourishment is
                    authorized for a 50-year period at an estimated average
                    annual cost of $1,114,000, with an estimated annual
                    Federal cost of $897,000 and an estimated annual non-
                    Federal cost of $217,000.
                (16) New jersey shore protection, brigantine inlet to great
            egg harbor, brigantine island, new jersey.--
                        (A) In general.--The project for hurricane and
                    storm damage reduction and shore protection, New Jersey
                    Shore protection, Brigantine Inlet to Great Egg Harbor,
                    Brigantine Island, New Jersey, at a total cost of
                    $4,970,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
                    $3,230,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
                    $1,740,000.
                        (B) Periodic nourishment.--Periodic nourishment is
                    authorized for a 50-year period at an estimated average
                    annual cost of $465,000, with an estimated annual
                    Federal cost of $302,000 and an estimated annual non-
                    Federal cost of $163,000.
                (17) Columbia river channel deepening, oregon and
            washington.--
                        (A) In general.--The project for navigation,
                    Columbia River channel deepening, Oregon and
                    Washington, at a total cost of $182,423,000, with an
                    estimated Federal cost of $106,132,000 and an estimated
                    non-Federal cost of $76,291,000.
                        (B) Berthing areas and other local service
                    facilities.--The non-Federal interests shall provide
                    berthing areas and other local service facilities
                    necessary for the project at an estimated cost of
                    $1,200,000.
                (18) Memphis harbor, memphis, tennessee.--
                        (A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B), the
                    project for navigation, Memphis Harbor, Memphis,
                    Tennessee, authorized by section 601(a) of the Water
                    Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4145) and
                    deauthorized under section 1001(a) of that Act (33
                    U.S.C. 579a(a)) is authorized to be carried out by the
                    Secretary.
                        (B) Condition.--No construction may be initiated
                    unless the Secretary determines through a general
                    reevaluation report using current data, that the
                    project is technically sound, environmentally
                    acceptable, and economically justified.
                (19) Johnson creek, arlington, texas.--The project for
            flood damage reduction, environmental restoration, and
            recreation, Johnson Creek, Arlington, Texas, at a total cost of
            $20,300,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $12,000,000 and
            an estimated non-Federal cost of $8,300,000.
                (20) Howard hanson dam, washington.--The project for water
            supply and ecosystem restoration, Howard Hanson Dam,
            Washington, at a total cost of $75,600,000, with an estimated
            Federal cost of $36,900,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost
            of $38,700,000.

    SEC. 102. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS.

        (a) Projects With Reports.--
                (1) San lorenzo river, california.--The project for flood
            control, San Lorenzo River, California, authorized by section
            101(a)(5) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110
            Stat. 3663), is modified to authorize the Secretary to include
            as a part of the project streambank erosion control measures to
            be undertaken substantially in accordance with the report
            entitled ``Bank Stabilization Concept, Laurel Street
            Extension'', dated April 23, 1998, at a total cost of
            $4,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $2,600,000 and an
            estimated non-Federal cost of $1,400,000.
                (2) St. johns county shore protection, florida.--
                        (A) In general.--The project for hurricane and
                    storm damage reduction and shore protection, St. Johns
                    County, Florida, authorized by section 501(a) of the
                    Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat.
                    4133) is modified to authorize the Secretary to include
                    navigation mitigation as a purpose of the project in
                    accordance with the report of the Corps of Engineers
                    dated November 18, 1998, at a total cost of
                    $16,086,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
                    $12,949,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
                    $3,137,000.
                        (B) Periodic nourishment.--Periodic nourishment is
                    authorized for a 50-year period at an estimated average
                    annual cost of $8,137,000, with an estimated annual
                    Federal cost of $6,550,000 and an estimated annual non-
                    Federal cost of $1,587,000.
                (3) Wood river, grand island, nebraska.--The project for
            flood control, Wood River, Grand Island, Nebraska, authorized
            by section 101(a)(19) of the Water Resources Development Act of
            1996 (110 Stat. 3665) is modified to authorize the Secretary to
            construct the project in accordance with the Corps of Engineers
            report dated June 29, 1998, at a total cost of $17,039,000,
            with an estimated Federal cost of $9,730,000 and an estimated
            non-Federal cost of $7,309,000.
                (4) Absecon island, new jersey.--The project for Absecon
            Island, New Jersey, authorized by section 101(b)(13) of the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3668) is
            amended to authorize the Secretary to reimburse the non-Federal
            interests for all work performed, consistent with the
            authorized project.
                (5) Arthur kill, new york and new jersey.--
                        (A) In general.--The project for navigation, Arthur
                    Kill, New York and New Jersey, authorized by section
                    202(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986
                    (100 Stat. 4098) and modified by section 301(b)(11) of
                    the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat.
                    3711), is further modified to authorize the Secretary
                    to construct the project at a total cost of
                    $276,800,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
                    $183,200,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
                    $93,600,000.
                        (B) Berthing areas and other local service
                    facilities.--The non-Federal interests shall provide
                    berthing areas and other local service facilities
                    necessary for the project at an estimated cost of
                    $38,900,000.
                (6) Waurika lake, oklahoma, water conveyance facilities.--
            The requirement for the Waurika Project Master Conservancy
            District to repay the $2,900,000 in costs (including interest)
            resulting from the October 1991 settlement of the claim of the
            Travelers Insurance Company before the United States Claims
            Court related to construction of the water conveyance
            facilities authorized by the first section of Public Law 88-253
            (77 Stat. 841) is waived.
        (b) Projects Subject to Reports.--The following projects are
    modified as follows, except that no funds may be obligated to carry out
    work under such modifications until completion of a final report by the
    Chief of Engineers, as approved by the Secretary, finding that such
    work is technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and economically
    justified, as applicable:
                (1) Thornton reservoir, cook county, illinois.--
                        (A) In general.--The Thornton Reservoir project, an
                    element of the project for flood control, Chicagoland
                    Underflow Plan, Illinois, authorized by section 3(a)(5)
                    of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102
                    Stat. 4013), is modified to authorize the Secretary to
                    include additional permanent flood control storage
                    attributable to the Natural Resources Conservation
                    Service Thornton Reservoir (Structure 84), Little
                    Calumet River Watershed, Illinois, approved under the
                    Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act (16
                    U.S.C. 1001 et seq.).
                        (B) Cost sharing.--Costs for the Thornton Reservoir
                    project shall be shared in accordance with section 103
    of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213).
                        (C) Transitional storage.--The Secretary of
                    Agriculture may cooperate with non-Federal interests to
                    provide, on a transitional basis, flood control storage
                    for the Natural Resources Conservation Service Thornton
                    Reservoir (Structure 84) project in the west lobe of
                    the Thornton quarry.
                        (D) Crediting.--The Secretary may credit against
                    the non-Federal share of the Thornton Reservoir project
                    all design and construction costs incurred by the non-
                    Federal interests before the date of enactment of this
                    Act.
                        (E) Reevaluation report.--The Secretary shall
                    determine the credits authorized by subparagraph (D)
                    that are integral to the Thornton Reservoir project and
                    the current total project costs based on a limited
                    reevaluation report.
                (2) Wells harbor, wells, maine.--
                        (A) In general.--The project for navigation, Wells
                    Harbor, Maine, authorized by section 101 of the River
                    and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 480), is modified to
                    authorize the Secretary to realign the channel and
                    anchorage areas based on a harbor design capacity of
                    150 craft.
                        (B) Deauthorization of certain portions.--The
                    following portions of the project are not authorized
                    after the date of enactment of this Act:
                                (i) The portion of the 6-foot channel the
                            boundaries of which begin at a point with
                            coordinates N177,992.00, E394,831.00, thence
                            running south 83 degrees 58 minutes 14.8
                            seconds west 10.38 feet to a point N177,990.91,
                            E394,820.68, thence running south 11 degrees 46
                            minutes 47.7 seconds west 991.76 feet to a
                            point N177,020.04, E394,618.21, thence running
                            south 78 degrees 13 minutes 45.7 seconds east
                            10.00 feet to a point N177,018.00, E394,628.00,
                            thence running north 11 degrees 46 minutes 22.8
                            seconds east 994.93 feet to the point of
                            origin.
                                (ii) The portion of the 6-foot anchorage
                            the boundaries of which begin at a point with
                            coordinates N177,778.07, E394,336.96, thence
                            running south 51 degrees 58 minutes 32.7
                            seconds west 15.49 feet to a point N177,768.53,
                            E394,324.76, thence running south 11 degrees 46
                            minutes 26.5 seconds west 672.87 feet to a
                            point N177,109.82, E394,187.46, thence running
                            south 78 degrees 13 minutes 45.7 seconds east
                            10.00 feet to a point N177,107.78, E394,197.25,
                            thence running north 11 degrees 46 minutes 25.4
                            seconds east 684.70 feet to the point of
                            origin.
                                (iii) The portion of the 10-foot settling
                            basin the boundaries of which begin at a point
                            with coordinates N177,107.78, E394,197.25,
                            thence running north 78 degrees 13 minutes 45.7
                            seconds west 10.00 feet to a point N177,109.82,
                            E394,187.46, thence running south 11 degrees 46
                            minutes 15.7 seconds west 300.00 feet to a
                            point N176,816.13, E394,126.26, thence running
                            south 78 degrees 12 minutes 21.4 seconds east
                            9.98 feet to a point N176,814.09, E394,136.03,
                            thence running north 11 degrees 46 minutes 29.1
                            seconds east 300.00 feet to the point of
                            origin.
                                (iv) The portion of the 10-foot settling
                            basin the boundaries of which begin at a point
                            with coordinates N177,018.00, E394,628.00,
                            thence running north 78 degrees 13 minutes 45.7
                            seconds west 10.00 feet to a point N177,020.04,
                            E394,618.21, thence running south 11 degrees 46
                            minutes 44.0 seconds west 300.00 feet to a
                            point N176,726.36, E394,556.97, thence running
                            south 78 degrees 12 minutes 30.3 seconds east
                            10.03 feet to a point N176,724.31, E394,566.79,
                            thence running north 11 degrees 46 minutes 22.4
                            seconds east 300.00 feet to the point of
                            origin.
                        (C) Redesignations.--The following portions of the
                    project shall be redesignated as part of the 6-foot
                    anchorage:
                                (i) The portion of the 6-foot channel the
                            boundaries of which begin at a point with
                            coordinates N177,990.91, E394,820.68, thence
                            running south 83 degrees 58 minutes 40.8
                            seconds west 94.65 feet to a point N177,980.98,
                            E394,726.55, thence running south 11 degrees 46
                            minutes 22.4 seconds west 962.83 feet to a
                            point N177,038.40, E394,530.10, thence running
                            south 78 degrees 13 minutes 45.7 seconds east
                            90.00 feet to a point N177,020.04, E394,618.21,
    thence running north 11 degrees 46 minutes 47.7 seconds east 991.76
    feet to the point of origin.
                                (ii) The portion of the 10-foot inner
                            harbor settling basin the boundaries of which
                            begin at a point with coordinates N177,020.04,
                            E394,618.21, thence running north 78 degrees 13
                            minutes 30.5 seconds west 160.00 feet to a
                            point N177,052.69, E394,461.58, thence running
                            south 11 degrees 46 minutes 45.4 seconds west
                            299.99 feet to a point N176,759.02,
                            E394,400.34, thence running south 78 degrees 13
                            minutes 17.9 seconds east 160 feet to a point
                            N176,726.36, E394,556.97, thence running north
                            11 degrees 46 minutes 44.0 seconds east 300.00
                            feet to the point of origin.
                                (iii) The portion of the 6-foot anchorage
                            the boundaries of which begin at a point with
                            coordinates N178,102.26, E394,751.83, thence
                            running south 51 degrees 59 minutes 42.1
                            seconds west 526.51 feet to a point
                            N177,778.07, E394,336.96, thence running south
                            11 degrees 46 minutes 26.6 seconds west 511.83
                            feet to a point N177,277.01, E394,232.52,
                            thence running south 78 degrees 13 minutes 17.9
                            seconds east 80.00 feet to a point N177,260.68,
                            E394,310.84, thence running north 11 degrees 46
                            minutes 24.8 seconds east 482.54 feet to a
                            point N177,733.07, E394,409.30, thence running
                            north 51 degrees 59 minutes 41.0 seconds east
                            402.63 feet to a point N177,980.98,
                            E394,726.55, thence running north 11 degrees 46
                            minutes 27.6 seconds east 123.89 feet to the
                            point of origin.
                        (D) Realignment.--The 6-foot anchorage area
                    described in subparagraph (C)(iii) shall be realigned
                    to include the area located south of the inner harbor
                    settling basin in existence on the date of enactment of
                    this Act beginning at a point with coordinates
                    N176,726.36, E394,556.97, thence running north 78
                    degrees 13 minutes 17.9 seconds west 160.00 feet to a
                    point N176,759.02, E394,400.34, thence running south 11
                    degrees 47 minutes 03.8 seconds west 45 feet to a point
                    N176,714.97, E394,391.15, thence running south 78
                    degrees 13 minutes 17.9 seconds 160.00 feet to a point
                    N176,682.31, E394,547.78, thence running north 11
                    degrees 47 minutes 03.8 seconds east 45 feet to the
                    point of origin.
                        (E) Relocation.--The Secretary may relocate the
                    settling basin feature of the project to the outer
                    harbor between the jetties.
                (3) New york harbor and adjacent channels, port jersey, new
            jersey.--
                        (A) In general.--The project for navigation, New
                    York Harbor and adjacent channels, Port Jersey, New
                    Jersey, authorized by section 201(b) of the Water
                    Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4091), is
                    modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the
                    project at a total cost of $102,545,000, with an
                    estimated Federal cost of $76,909,000 and an estimated
                    non-Federal cost of $25,636,000.
                        (B) Berthing areas and other local facilities.--The
                    non-Federal interests shall provide berthing areas and
                    other local service facilities necessary for the
                    project at an estimated cost of $722,000.
        (c) Beaver Lake, Arkansas, Water Supply Storage Reallocation.--The
    Secretary shall reallocate approximately 31,000 additional acre-feet at
    Beaver Lake, Arkansas, to water supply storage at no cost to the Beaver
    Water District or the Carroll-Boone Water District, except that at no
    time shall the bottom of the conservation pool be at an elevation that
    is less than 1,076 feet, NGVD.
        (d) Tolchester Channel S-Turn, Baltimore, Maryland.--The project
    for navigation, Baltimore Harbor and Channels, Maryland, authorized by
    section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 297), is
    modified to direct the Secretary to straighten the Tolchester Channel
    S-turn as part of project maintenance.
        (e) Tropicana Wash and Flamingo Wash, Nevada.--Any Federal costs
    associated with the Tropicana and Flamingo Washes, Nevada, authorized
    by section 101(13) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106
    Stat. 4803), incurred by the non-Federal interest to accelerate or
    modify construction of the project, in cooperation with the Corps of
    Engineers, shall be considered to be eligible for reimbursement by the
    Secretary.
        (f) Rediversion Project, Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, South
    Carolina.--
                (1) In general.--The rediversion project, Cooper River,
            Charleston Harbor, South Carolina, authorized by section 101 of
            the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731) and modified by
            title I of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations
    Act, 1992 (105 Stat. 517), is modified to authorize the Secretary to
    pay the State of South Carolina not more than $3,750,000, if the State
    enters into an agreement with the Secretary providing that the State
    shall perform all future operation of the St. Stephen, South Carolina,
    fish lift (including associated studies to assess the efficacy of the
    fish lift).
                (2) Contents.--The agreement shall specify the terms and
            conditions under which payment will be made and the rights of,
            and remedies available to, the Secretary to recover all or a
            portion of the payment if the State suspends or terminates
            operation of the fish lift or fails to perform the operation in
            a manner satisfactory to the Secretary.
                (3) Maintenance.--Maintenance of the fish lift shall remain
            a Federal responsibility.
        (g) Trinity River and Tributaries, Texas.--The project for flood
    control and navigation, Trinity River and tributaries, Texas,
    authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat.
    1091), is modified to add environmental restoration as a project
    purpose.
        (h) Beach Erosion Control and Hurricane Protection, Virginia Beach,
    Virginia.--
                (1) Acceptance of funds.--In any fiscal year that the Corps
            of Engineers does not receive appropriations sufficient to meet
            expected project expenditures for that year, the Secretary
            shall accept from the city of Virginia Beach, Virginia, for
            purposes of the project for beach erosion control and hurricane
            protection, Virginia Beach, Virginia, authorized by section
            501(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100
            Stat. 4136), such funds as the city may advance for the
            project.
                (2) Repayment.--Subject to the availability of
            appropriations, the Secretary shall repay, without interest,
            the amount of any advance made under paragraph (1), from
            appropriations that may be provided by Congress for river and
            harbor, flood control, shore protection, and related projects.
        (i) Elizabeth River, Chesapeake, Virginia.--Notwithstanding any
    other provision of law, after the date of enactment of this Act, the
    city of Chesapeake, Virginia, shall not be obligated to make the annual
    cash contribution required under paragraph 1(9) of the Local
    Cooperation Agreement dated December 12, 1978, between the Government
    and the city for the project for navigation, southern branch of
    Elizabeth River, Chesapeake, Virginia.
        (j) Payment Option, Moorefield, West Virginia.--The Secretary may
    permit the non-Federal interests for the project for flood control,
    Moorefield, West Virginia, to pay without interest the remaining non-
    Federal cost over a period not to exceed 30 years, to be determined by
    the Secretary.
        (k) Miami Dade Agricultural and Rural Land Retention Plan and South
    Biscayne, Florida.--Section 528(b)(3) of the Water Resources
    Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3768) is amended by adding at the
    end the following:
                        ``(D) Credit and reimbursement of past and future
                    activities.--The Secretary may afford credit to or
                    reimburse the non-Federal sponsors (using funds
                    authorized by subparagraph (C)) for the reasonable
                    costs of any work that has been performed or will be
                    performed in connection with a study or activity
                    meeting the requirements of subparagraph (A) if--
                                ``(i) the Secretary determines that--
                                        ``(I) the work performed by the
                                    non-Federal sponsors will substantially
                                    expedite completion of a critical
                                    restoration project; and
                                        ``(II) the work is necessary for a
                                    critical restoration project; and
                                ``(ii) the credit or reimbursement is
                            granted pursuant to a project-specific
                            agreement that prescribes the terms and
                            conditions of the credit or reimbursement.''.
        (l) Lake Michigan, Illinois.--
                (1) In general.--The project for storm damage reduction and
            shoreline protection, Lake Michigan, Illinois, from Wilmette,
            Illinois, to the Illinois-Indiana State line, authorized by
            section 101(a)(12) of the Water Resources Development Act of
            1996 (110 Stat. 3664), is modified to provide for reimbursement
            for additional project work undertaken by the non-Federal
            interest.
                (2) Credit or reimbursement.--The Secretary shall credit or
            reimburse the non-Federal interest for the Federal share of
            project costs incurred by the non-Federal interest in
            designing, constructing, or reconstructing reach 2F (700 feet
            south of Fullerton Avenue and 500 feet north of Fullerton
            Avenue), reach 3M (Meigs Field), and segments 7 and 8 of reach
            4 (43rd Street to 57th Street), if the non-Federal interest
            carries out the work in accordance with plans approved by the
            Secretary, at an estimated total cost of $83,300,000.
                (3) Reimbursement.--The Secretary shall reimburse the non-
            Federal interest for the Federal share of project costs
            incurred by the non-Federal interest in reconstructing the
            revetment structures protecting Solidarity Drive in Chicago,
            Illinois, before the signing of the project cooperation
            agreement, at an estimated total cost of $7,600,000.
        (m) Measurements of Lake Michigan Diversions, Illinois.--Section
    1142(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4253)
    is amended by striking ``$250,000 per fiscal year for each fiscal year
    beginning after September 30, 1986'' and inserting ``a total of
    $1,250,000 for each of fiscal years 1999 through 2003''.
        (n) Project for Navigation, Dubuque, Iowa.--The project for
    navigation at Dubuque, Iowa, authorized by section 101 of the River and
    Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 482), is modified to authorize the
    development of a wetland demonstration area of approximately 1.5 acres
    to be developed and operated by the Dubuque County Historical Society
    or a successor nonprofit organization.
        (o) Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee.--The Secretary may credit
    against the non-Federal share work performed in the project area of the
    Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee, Mississippi River, Louisiana,
    authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of
    1986 (100 Stat. 4117).
        (p) Jackson County, Mississippi.--The project for environmental
    infrastructure, Jackson County, Mississippi, authorized by section
    219(c)(5) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat.
    4835) and modified by section 504 of the Water Resources Development
    Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3757), is modified to direct the Secretary to
    provide a credit, not to exceed $5,000,000, against the non-Federal
    share of the cost of the project for the costs incurred by the Jackson
    County Board of Supervisors since February 8, 1994, in constructing the
    project, if the Secretary determines that such costs are for work that
    the Secretary determines was compatible with and integral to the
    project.
        (q) Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, South Carolina.--
                (1) In general.--Except as otherwise provided in this
            paragraph, the Secretary shall convey to the State of South
            Carolina all right, title, and interest of the United States in
            the parcels of land described in subparagraph (B) that are
            currently being managed by the South Carolina Department of
            Natural Resources for fish and wildlife mitigation purposes for
            the Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, South Carolina, project
            authorized by the Flood Control Act of 1966 and modified by the
            Water Resources Development Act of 1986.
                (2) Land description.--
                        (A) In general.--The parcels of land to be conveyed
                    are described in Exhibits A, F, and H of Army Lease No.
                    DACW21-1-93-0910 and associated supplemental agreements
                    or are designated in red in Exhibit A of Army License
                    No. DACW21-3-85-1904, excluding all designated parcels
                    in the license that are below elevation 346 feet mean
                    sea level or that are less than 300 feet measured
                    horizontally from the top of the power pool.
                        (B) Management of excluded parcels.--Management of
                    the excluded parcels shall continue in accordance with
                    the terms of Army License No. DACW21-3-85-1904 until
                    the Secretary and the State enter into an agreement
                    under subparagraph (F).
                        (C) Survey.--The exact acreage and legal
                    description of the land shall be determined by a survey
                    satisfactory to the Secretary, with the cost of the
                    survey borne by the State.
                (3) Costs of conveyance.--The State shall be responsible
            for all costs, including real estate transaction and
            environmental compliance costs, associated with the conveyance.
                (4) Perpetual status.--
                        (A) In general.--All land conveyed under this
                    paragraph shall be retained in public ownership and
                    shall be managed in perpetuity for fish and wildlife
                    mitigation purposes in accordance with a plan approved
                    by the Secretary.
                        (B) Reversion.--If any parcel of land is not
                    managed for fish and wildlife mitigation purposes in
                    accordance with the plan, title to the parcel shall
                    revert to the United States.
                (5) Additional terms and conditions.--The Secretary may
            require such additional terms and conditions in connection with
            the conveyance as the Secretary considers appropriate to
            protect the interests of the United States.
                (6) Fish and wildlife mitigation agreement.--
                        (A) In general.--The Secretary may pay the State of
                    South Carolina not more than $4,850,000 subject to the
                    Secretary and the State entering into a binding
                    agreement for the State to manage for fish and wildlife
                    mitigation purposes in perpetuity the lands conveyed
                    under this paragraph and excluded parcels designated in
                    Exhibit A of Army License No. DACW21-3-85-1904.
                        (B) Failure of performance.--The agreement shall
                    specify the terms and conditions under which payment
                    will be made and the rights of, and remedies available
                    to, the Federal Government to recover all or a portion
                    of the payment if the State fails to manage any parcel
                    in a manner satisfactory to the Secretary.
        (r) Land Conveyance, Clarkston, Washington.--
                (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the Port of
            Clarkston, Washington, all right, title, and interest of the
            United States in and to a portion of the land described in the
            Department of the Army lease No. DACW68-1-97-22, consisting of
            approximately 31 acres, the exact boundaries of which shall be
            determined by the Secretary and the Port of Clarkston.
                (2) Additional land.--The Secretary may convey to the Port
            of Clarkston, Washington, such additional land located in the
            vicinity of Clarkston, Washington, as the Secretary determines
            to be excess to the needs of the Columbia River Project and
            appropriate for conveyance.
                (3) Terms and conditions.--The conveyances made under
            paragraphs (1) and (2) shall be subject to such terms and
            conditions as the Secretary determines to be necessary to
            protect the interests of the United States, including a
            requirement that the Port of Clarkston pay all administrative
            costs associated with the conveyances, including the cost of
            land surveys and appraisals and costs associated with
            compliance with applicable environmental laws (including
            regulations).
                (4) Use of land.--The Port of Clarkston shall be required
            to pay the fair market value, as determined by the Secretary,
            of any land conveyed pursuant to paragraphs (1) and (2) that is
            not retained in public ownership and used for public park or
            recreation purposes, except that the Secretary shall have a
            right of reverter to reclaim possession and title to any such
            land.
        (s) White River, Indiana.--The project for flood control,
    Indianapolis on West Fork of the White River, Indiana, authorized by
    section 5 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of
    certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and other
    purposes'', approved June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1586, chapter 688), as
    modified by section 323 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996
    (110 Stat. 3716), is modified to authorize the Secretary to undertake
    the riverfront alterations described in the Central Indianapolis
    Waterfront Concept Plan, dated February 1994, for the Canal Development
    (Upper Canal feature) and the Beveridge Paper feature, at a total cost
    not to exceed $25,000,000, of which $12,500,000 is the estimated
    Federal cost and $12,500,000 is the estimated non-Federal cost, except
    that no such alterations may be undertaken unless the Secretary
    determines that the alterations authorized by this subsection, in
    combination with the alterations undertaken under section 323 of the
    Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3716), are
    economically justified.
        (t) Fox Point Hurricane Barrier, Providence, Rhode Island.--The
    project for hurricane-flood protection, Fox Point, Providence, Rhode
    Island, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1958 (72
    Stat. 306) is modified to direct the Secretary to undertake the
    necessary repairs to the barrier, as identified in the Condition Survey
    and Technical Assessment dated April 1998 with Supplement dated August
    1998, at a total cost of $3,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
    $1,950,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $1,050,000.

    SEC. 103. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.

        (a) Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut.--The portion of the project for
    navigation, Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by section 101
    of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 297), consisting of a
    2.4-acre anchorage area 9 feet deep and an adjacent 0.60-acre anchorage
    area 6 feet deep, located on the west side of Johnsons River,
    Connecticut, is not authorized after the date of enactment of this Act.
        (b) Bass Harbor, Maine.--
                (1) Deauthorization.--The portions of the project for
            navigation, Bass Harbor, Maine, authorized on May 7, 1962,
            under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33
            U.S.C. 577) described in paragraph (2) are not authorized after
    the date of enactment of this Act.
                (2) Description.--The portions of the project referred to
            in paragraph (1) are described as follows:
                        (A) Beginning at a bend in the project, N149040.00,
                    E538505.00, thence running easterly about 50.00 feet
                    along the northern limit of the project to a point,
                    N149061.55, E538550.11, thence running southerly about
                    642.08 feet to a point, N148477.64, E538817.18, thence
                    running southwesterly about 156.27 feet to a point on
                    the westerly limit of the project, N148348.50,
                    E538737.02, thence running northerly about 149.00 feet
                    along the westerly limit of the project to a bend in
                    the project, N148489.22, E538768.09, thence running
                    northwesterly about 610.39 feet along the westerly
                    limit of the project to the point of origin.
                        (B) Beginning at a point on the westerly limit of
                    the project, N148118.55, E538689.05, thence running
                    southeasterly about 91.92 feet to a point, N148041.43,
                    E538739.07, thence running southerly about 65.00 feet
                    to a point, N147977.86, E538725.51, thence running
                    southwesterly about 91.92 feet to a point on the
                    westerly limit of the project, N147927.84, E538648.39,
                    thence running northerly about 195.00 feet along the
                    westerly limit of the project to the point of origin.
        (c) Boothbay Harbor, Maine.--The project for navigation, Boothbay
    Harbor, Maine, authorized by the Act of July 25, 1912 (37 Stat. 201,
    chapter 253), is not authorized after the date of enactment of this
    Act.
        (d) East Boothbay Harbor, Maine.--Section 364 of the Water
    Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3731) is amended by
    striking paragraph (9) and inserting the following:
                ``(9) East boothbay harbor, maine.--The project for
            navigation, East Boothbay Harbor, Maine, authorized by the
            first section of the Act entitled `An Act making appropriations
            for the construction, repair, and preservation of certain
            public works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes',
            approved June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 657).''.

    SEC. 104. STUDIES.

        (a) Caddo Levee, Red River Below Denison Dam, Arizona, Louisiana,
    Oklahoma, and Texas.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine
    the feasibility of undertaking a project for flood control, Caddo
    Levee, Red River Below Denison Dam, Arizona, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and
    Texas, including incorporating the existing levee, along Twelve Mile
    Bayou from its juncture with the existing Red River Below Denison Dam
    Levee approximately 26 miles upstream to its terminus at high ground in
    the vicinity of Black Bayou, Louisiana.
        (b) Fields Landing Channel, Humboldt Harbor, California.--The
    Secretary--
                (1) shall conduct a study for the project for navigation,
            Fields Landing Channel, Humboldt Harbor and Bay, California, to
            a depth of minus 35 feet (MLLW), and for that purpose may use
            any feasibility report prepared by the non-Federal sponsor
            under section 203 of the Water Resources Development Act of
            1986 (33 U.S.C. 2231) for which reimbursement of the Federal
            share of the study is authorized subject to the availability of
            appropriations; and
                (2) may carry out the project under section 107 of the
            River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), if the Secretary
            determines that the project is feasible.
        (c) Strawberry Creek, Berkeley, California.--The Secretary shall
    conduct a study to determine the feasibility of restoring Strawberry
    Creek, Berkeley, California, and the Federal interest in environmental
    restoration, conservation of fish and wildlife resources, recreation,
    and water quality.
        (d) West Side Storm Water Retention Facility, City of Lancaster,
    California.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the
    feasibility of undertaking measures to construct the West Side Storm
    Water Retention Facility in the city of Lancaster, California.
        (e) Apalachicola River, Florida.--The Secretary shall conduct a
    study for the purpose of identifying--
                (1) alternatives for the management of material dredged in
            connection with operation and maintenance of the Apalachicola
            River Navigation Project; and
                (2) alternatives that reduce the requirements for such
            dredging.
        (f) Broward County, Sand Bypassing at Port Everglades, Florida.--
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of
    constructing a sand bypassing project at the Port Everglades Inlet,
    Florida.
        (g) City of Destin-Noriega Point Breakwater, Florida.--The
    Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of--
                (1) restoring Noriega Point, Florida, to serve as a
            breakwater for Destin Harbor; and
                (2) including Noriega Point as part of the East Pass,
            Florida, navigation project.
        (h) Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area, Florida.--
                (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to
            determine the feasibility of undertaking measures to reduce the
            flooding problems in the vicinity of Gateway Triangle
            Redevelopment Area, Florida.
                (2) Studies and reports.--The study shall include a review
            and consideration of studies and reports completed by the non-
            Federal interests.
        (i) City of Plant City, Florida.--
                (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to
            determine the feasibility of a flood control project in the
            city of Plant City, Florida.
                (2) Studies and reports.--In conducting the study, the
            Secretary shall review and consider studies and reports
            completed by the non-Federal interests.
        (j) Goose Creek Watershed, Oakley, Idaho.--The Secretary shall
    conduct a study to determine the feasibility of undertaking flood
    damage reduction, water conservation, ground water recharge, ecosystem
    restoration, and related purposes along the Goose Creek watershed near
    Oakley, Idaho.
        (k) Little Wood River, Gooding, Idaho.--The Secretary shall conduct
    a study to determine the feasibility of restoring and repairing the
    Lava Rock Little Wood River Containment System to prevent flooding in
    the city of Gooding, Idaho.
        (l) Snake River and Payette River, Idaho.--The Secretary shall
    conduct a study to determine the feasibility of a flood control project
    along the Snake River and Payette River, in the vicinity of Payette,
    Idaho.
        (m) Acadiana Navigation Channel, Louisiana.--The Secretary shall
    conduct a study to determine the feasibility of assuming operations and
    maintenance for the Acadiana Navigation Channel located in Iberia and
    Vermillion Parishes, Louisiana.
        (n) Cameron Parish West of Calcasieu River, Louisiana.--The
    Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of a storm
    damage reduction and ecosystem restoration project for Cameron Parish
    west of Calcasieu River, Louisiana.
        (o) Beneficial Use of Dredged Material, Coastal Louisiana.--The
    Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of using
    dredged material from maintenance activities at Federal navigation
    projects in coastal Louisiana to benefit coastal areas in the State.
        (p) Contraband Bayou Navigation Channel, Louisiana.--The Secretary
    shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of assuming the
    maintenance at Contraband Bayou, Calcasieu River Ship Canal, Louisiana.
        (q) Golden Meadow Lock, Louisiana.--The Secretary shall conduct a
    study to determine the feasibility of converting the Golden Meadow
    floodgate into a navigation lock to be included in the Larose to Golden
    Meadow Hurricane Protection Project, Louisiana.
        (r) Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Ecosystem Protection, Chef Menteur
    to Sabine River, Louisiana.--
                (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to
            determine the feasibility of undertaking ecosystem restoration
            and protection measures along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway
            from Chef Menteur to Sabine River, Louisiana.
                (2) Matters to be addressed.--The study shall address
            saltwater intrusion, tidal scour, erosion, and other water
            resources related problems in that area.
        (s) Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana, and Vicinity, St. Charles Parish
    Pumps.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the
    feasibility of modifying the Lake Pontchartrain Hurricane Protection
    Project to include the St. Charles Parish Pumps and the modification of
    the seawall fronting protection along Lake Pontchartrain in Orleans
    Parish, from New Basin Canal on the west to the Inner Harbor Navigation
    Canal on the east.
        (t) Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity Seawall Restoration,
    Louisiana.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the
    feasibility of undertaking structural modifications of that portion of
    the seawall fronting protection along the south shore of Lake
    Pontchartrain in Orleans Parish, Louisiana, extending approximately 5
    miles from the new basin Canal on the west to the Inner Harbor
    Navigation Canal on the east as a part of the Lake Pontchartrain and
    Vicinity Hurricane Protection Project, authorized by section 204 of the
    Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1077).
        (u) Detroit River, Michigan, Greenway Corridor Study.--
                (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to
            determine the feasibility of a project for shoreline
            protection, frontal erosion, and associated purposes in the
            Detroit River shoreline area from the Belle Isle Bridge to the
            Ambassador Bridge in Detroit, Michigan.
                (2) Potential modifications.--As a part of the study, the
            Secretary shall review potential project modifications to any
            existing Corps projects within the same area.
        (v) St. Clair Shores Flood Control, Michigan.--The Secretary shall
    conduct a study to determine the feasibility of constructing a flood
    control project at St. Clair Shores, Michigan.
        (w) Woodtick Peninsula, Michigan, and Toledo Harbor, Ohio.--The
    Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of
    utilizing dredged material from Toledo Harbor, Ohio, to provide erosion
    reduction, navigation, and ecosystem restoration at Woodtick Peninsula,
    Michigan.
        (x) Tunica Lake Weir, Mississippi.--
                (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to
            determine the feasibility of constructing an outlet weir at
            Tunica Lake, Tunica County, Mississippi, and Lee County,
            Arkansas, for the purpose of stabilizing water levels in the
            Lake.
                (2) Economic analysis.--In carrying out the study, the
            Secretary shall include as a part of the economic analysis the
            benefits derived from recreation uses at the Lake and economic
            benefits associated with restoration of fish and wildlife
            habitat.
        (y) Protective Facilities for the St. Louis, Missouri, Riverfront
    Area.--
                (1) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to
            determine the optimal plan to protect facilities that are
            located on the Mississippi River riverfront within the
            boundaries of St. Louis, Missouri.
                (2) Requirements.--In conducting the study, the Secretary
            shall--
                        (A) evaluate alternatives to offer safety and
                    security to facilities; and
                        (B) use state-of-the-art techniques to best
                    evaluate the current situation, probable solutions, and
                    estimated costs.
                (3) Report.--Not later than April 15, 1999, the Secretary
            shall submit to Congress a report on the results of the study.
        (z) Yellowstone River, Montana.--
                (1) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive
            study of the Yellowstone River from Gardiner, Montana to the
            confluence of the Missouri River to determine the hydrologic,
            biological, and socioeconomic cumulative impacts on the river.
                (2) Consultation and coordination.--The Secretary shall
            conduct the study in consultation with the United States Fish
            and Wildlife Service, the United States Geological Survey, and
            the Natural Resources Conservation Service and with the full
            participation of the State of Montana and tribal and local
            entities, and provide for public participation.
                (3) Report.--Not later than 5 years after the date of
            enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit a report to
            Congress on the results of the study.
        (aa) Las Vegas Valley, Nevada.--
                (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a
            comprehensive study of water resources located in the Las Vegas
            Valley, Nevada.
                (2) Objectives.--The study shall identify problems and
            opportunities related to ecosystem restoration, water quality,
            particularly the quality of surface runoff, water supply, and
            flood control.
        (bb) Oswego River Basin, New York.--The Secretary shall conduct a
    study to determine the feasibility of establishing a flood forecasting
    system within the Oswego River basin, New York.
        (cc) Port of New York-New Jersey Navigation Study and Environmental
    Restoration Study.--
                (1) Navigation study.--The Secretary shall conduct a
            comprehensive study of navigation needs at the Port of New
            York-New Jersey (including the South Brooklyn Marine and Red
            Hook Container Terminals, Staten Island, and adjacent areas) to
            address improvements, including deepening of existing channels
            to depths of 50 feet or greater, that are required to provide
            economically efficient and environmentally sound navigation to
            meet current and future requirements.
                (2) Environmental restoration study.--The Secretary, acting
            through the Chief of Engineers, shall review the report of the
            Chief of Engineers on the New York Harbor, printed in the House
            Management Plan of the Harbor Estuary Program, and other
            pertinent reports concerning the New York Harbor Region and the
            Port of New York-New Jersey, to determine the Federal interest
    in advancing harbor environmental restoration.
                (3) Report.--The Secretary may use funds from the ongoing
            navigation study for New York and New Jersey Harbor to complete
            a reconnaissance report for environmental restoration by
            December 31, 1999. The navigation study to deepen New York and
            New Jersey Harbor shall consider beneficial use of dredged
            material.
        (dd) Bank Stabilization, Missouri River, North Dakota.--
                (1) Study.--
                        (A) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a
                    study to determine the feasibility of bank
                    stabilization on the Missouri River between the
                    Garrison Dam and Lake Oahe in North Dakota.
                        (B) Elements.--In conducting the study, the
                    Secretary shall study--
                                (i) options for stabilizing the erosion
                            sites on the banks of the Missouri River
                            between the Garrison Dam and Lake Oahe
                            identified in the report developed by the North
                            Dakota State Water Commission, dated December
                            1997, including stabilization through
                            nontraditional measures;
                                (ii) the cumulative impact of bank
                            stabilization measures between the Garrison Dam
                            and Lake Oahe on fish and wildlife habitat and
                            the potential impact of additional
                            stabilization measures, including the impact of
                            nontraditional stabilization measures;
                                (iii) the current and future effects,
                            including economic and fish and wildlife
                            habitat effects, that bank erosion is having on
                            creating the delta at the beginning of Lake
                            Oahe; and
                                (iv) the impact of taking no additional
                            measures to stabilize the banks of the Missouri
                            River between the Garrison Dam and Lake Oahe.
                        (C) Interested parties.--In conducting the study,
                    the Secretary shall, to the maximum extent practicable,
                    seek the participation and views of interested Federal,
                    State, and local agencies, landowners, conservation
                    organizations, and other persons.
                        (D) Report.--
                                (i) In general.--The Secretary shall report
                            to Congress on the results of the study not
                            later than 1 year after the date of enactment
                            of this Act.
                                (ii) Status.--If the Secretary cannot
                            complete the study and report to Congress by
                            the day that is 1 year after the date of
                            enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall, by
                            that day, report to Congress on the status of
                            the study and report, including an estimate of
                            the date of completion.
                (2) Effect on existing projects.--This subsection does not
            preclude the Secretary from establishing or carrying out a
            stabilization project that is authorized by law.
        (ee) Cleveland Harbor, Cleveland, Ohio.--The Secretary shall
    conduct a study to determine the feasibility of undertaking repairs and
    related navigation improvements at Dike 14, Cleveland, Ohio.
        (ff) East Lake, Vermillion and Chagrin, Ohio.--
                (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to
            determine the feasibility of undertaking flood damage reduction
            at East Lake, Vermillion and Chagrin, Ohio.
                (2) Ice retention structure.--In conducting the study, the
            Secretary may consider construction of an ice retention
            structure as a potential means of providing flood damage
            reduction.
        (gg) Toussaint River, Carroll Township, Ohio.--The Secretary shall
    conduct a study to determine the feasibility of undertaking navigation
    improvements at Toussaint River, Carroll Township, Ohio.
        (hh) Santee Delta Wetland Habitat, South Carolina.--Not later than
    18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall
    complete a comprehensive study of the ecosystem in the Santee Delta
    focus area of South Carolina to determine the feasibility of
    undertaking measures to enhance the wetland habitat in the area.
        (ii) Waccamaw River, South Carolina.--The Secretary shall conduct a
    study to determine the feasibility of a flood control project for the
    Waccamaw River in Horry County, South Carolina.
        (jj) Upper Susquehanna-Lackawanna, Pennsylvania, Watershed
    Management and Restoration Study.--
                (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to
            determine the feasibility of a comprehensive flood plain
            management and watershed restoration project for the Upper
            Susquehanna-Lackawanna Watershed, Pennsylvania.
                (2) Geographic information system.--In conducting the
            study, the Secretary shall use a geographic information system.
                (3) Plans.--The study shall formulate plans for
            comprehensive flood plain management and environmental
            restoration.
                (4) Crediting.--Non-Federal interests may receive credit
            for in-kind services and materials that contribute to the
            study. The Secretary may credit non-Corps Federal assistance
            provided to the non-Federal interest toward the non-Federal
            share of study costs to the maximum extent authorized by law.
        (kk) Niobrara River and Missouri River Sedimentation Study, South
    Dakota.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the Niobrara River
    watershed and the operations of Fort Randall Dam and Gavins Point Dam
    on the Missouri River to determine the feasibility of alleviating the
    bank erosion, sedimentation, and related problems in the lower Niobrara
    River and the Missouri River below Fort Randall Dam.
        (ll) Santa Clara River, Utah.--
                (1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to
            determine the feasibility of undertaking measures to alleviate
            damage caused by flooding, bank erosion, and sedimentation
            along the watershed of the Santa Clara River, Utah, above the
            Gunlock Reservoir.
                (2) Contents.--The study shall include an analysis of
            watershed conditions and water quality, as related to flooding
            and bank erosion, along the Santa Clara River in the vicinity
            of the town of Gunlock, Utah.
        (mm) Agat Small Boat Harbor, Guam.--The Secretary shall conduct a
    study to determine the feasibility of undertaking the repair and
    reconstruction of Agat Small Boat Harbor, Guam, including the repair of
    existing shore protection measures and construction or a revetment of
    the breakwater seawall.
        (nn) Apra Harbor Seawall, Guam.--The Secretary shall conduct a
    study to determine the feasibility of undertaking measures to repair,
    upgrade, and extend the seawall protecting Apra Harbor, Guam, and to
    ensure continued access to the harbor via Route 11B.
        (oo) Apra Harbor Fuel Piers, Guam.--The Secretary shall conduct a
    study to determine the feasibility of undertaking measures to upgrade
    the piers and fuel transmission lines at the fuel piers in the Apra
    Harbor, Guam, and measures to provide for erosion control and
    protection against storm damage.
        (pp) Maintenance Dredging of Harbor Piers, Guam.--The Secretary
    shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of Federal
    maintenance of areas adjacent to piers at harbors in Guam, including
    Apra Harbor, Agat Harbor, and Agana Marina.
        (qq) Alternative Water Sources Study.--
                (1) In general.--The Administrator of the Environmental
            Protection Agency shall conduct a study of the water supply
            needs of States that are not currently eligible for assistance
            under title XVI of the Reclamation Projects Authorization and
            Adjustment Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. 390h et seq.).
                (2) Requirements.--The study shall--
                        (A) identify the water supply needs (including
                    potable, commercial, industrial, recreational and
                    agricultural needs) of each State described in
                    paragraph (1) through 2020, making use of such State,
                    regional, and local plans, studies, and reports as are
                    available;
                        (B) evaluate the feasibility of various alternative
                    water source technologies such as reuse and reclamation
                    of wastewater and stormwater (including indirect
                    potable reuse), aquifer storage and recovery, and
                    desalination to meet the anticipated water supply needs
    of the States; and
                        (C) assess how alternative water sources
                    technologies can be utilized to meet the identified
                    needs.
                (3) Report.--The Administrator shall report to Congress on
            the results of the study not more than 180 days after the date
            of enactment of this Act.

                          TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

    SEC. 201. FLOOD HAZARD MITIGATION AND RIVERINE ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION
                  PROGRAM.

        (a) In General.--
                (1) Authorization.--The Secretary may carry out a program
            to reduce flood hazards and restore the natural functions and
            values of riverine ecosystems throughout the United States.
                (2) Studies.--In carrying out the program, the Secretary
            shall conduct studies to identify appropriate flood damage
            reduction, conservation, and restoration measures and may
            design and implement watershed management and restoration
            projects.
                (3) Participation.--The studies and projects carried out
            under the program shall be conducted, to the extent
            practicable, with the full participation of the appropriate
            Federal agencies, including the Department of Agriculture, the
            Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Department of the
            Interior, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the
            Department of Commerce.
                (4) Nonstructural approaches.--The studies and projects
            shall, to the extent practicable, emphasize nonstructural
            approaches to preventing or reducing flood damages.
        (b) Cost-Sharing Requirements.--
                (1) Studies.--The cost of studies conducted under
            subsection (a) shall be shared in accordance with section 105
            of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 Stat. 2215).
                (2) Projects.--The non-Federal interests shall pay 35
            percent of the cost of any project carried out under this
            section.
                (3) In-kind contributions.--The non-Federal interests shall
            provide all land, easements, rights-of-way, dredged material
            disposal areas, and relocations necessary for the projects. The
            value of the land, easements, rights-of-way, dredged material
            disposal areas, and relocations shall be credited toward the
            payment required under this subsection.
                (4) Responsibilities of the non-federal interests.--The
            non-Federal interests shall be responsible for all costs
            associated with operating, maintaining, replacing, repairing,
            and rehabilitating all projects carried out under this section.
        (c) Project Justification.--
                (1) In general.--The Secretary may implement a project
            under this section if the Secretary determines that the
            project--
                        (A) will significantly reduce potential flood
                    damages;
                        (B) will improve the quality of the environment;
                    and
                        (C) is justified considering all costs and
                    beneficial outputs of the project.
                (2) Selection criteria; policies and procedures.--Not later
            than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the
            Secretary shall--
                        (A) develop criteria for selecting and rating the
                    projects to be carried out as part of the program
                    authorized by this section; and
                        (B) establish policies and procedures for carrying
                    out the studies and projects undertaken under this
                    section.
        (d) Reporting Requirement.--The Secretary may not implement a
    project under this section until--
                (1) the Secretary provides to the Committee on Environment
            and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on
            Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of
            Representatives a written notification describing the project
            and the determinations made under subsection (c); and
                (2) a period of 21 calendar days has expired following the
            date on which the notification was received by the Committees.
        (e) Priority Areas.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary
    shall examine the potential for flood damage reductions at appropriate
    locations, including--
                (1) Le May, Missouri;
                (2) the upper Delaware River basin, New York;
                (3) Mill Creek, Cincinnati, Ohio;
                (4) Tillamook County, Oregon;
                (5) Willamette River basin, Oregon; and
                (6) Providence County, Rhode Island.
        (f) Per-Project Limitation.--Not more than $25,000,000 in Army
    Civil Works appropriations may be expended on any single project
    undertaken under this section.
        (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--
                (1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated to
            carry out this section $75,000,000 for the period of fiscal
            years 2000 and 2001.
                (2) Program funding levels.--All studies and projects
            undertaken under this authority from Army Civil Works
            appropriations shall be fully funded within the program funding
            levels provided in this subsection.

    SEC. 202. SHORE PROTECTION.

        Section 103(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33
    U.S.C. 2213(d)) is amended--
                (1) by striking ``Costs of constructing'' and inserting the
            following:
                ``(1) Construction.--Costs of constructing''; and
                (2) by adding at the end the following:
                ``(2) Periodic nourishment.--In the case of a project
            authorized for construction after December 31, 1999, or for
            which a feasibility study is completed after that date, the
            non-Federal cost of the periodic nourishment of projects or
            measures for shore protection or beach erosion control shall be
            50 percent, except that--
                        ``(A) all costs assigned to benefits to privately
                    owned shores (where use of such shores is limited to
                    private interests) or to prevention of losses of
                    private land shall be borne by non-Federal interests;
                    and
                        ``(B) all costs assigned to the protection of
                    federally owned shores shall be borne by the United
                    States.''.

    SEC. 203. SMALL FLOOD CONTROL AUTHORITY.

        Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) is
    amended--
                (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``construction of
            small projects'' and inserting ``implementation of small
            structural and nonstructural projects''; and
                (2) in the third sentence, by striking ``$5,000,000'' and
            inserting ``$7,000,000''.

    SEC. 204. USE OF NON-FEDERAL FUNDS FOR COMPILING AND DISSEMINATING
                  INFORMATION ON FLOODS AND FLOOD DAMAGES.

        Section 206(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 709a(b))
    is amended in the third sentence by inserting before the period at the
    end the following: ``, but the Secretary of the Army may accept funds
    voluntarily contributed by such entities for the purpose of expanding
    the scope of the services requested by the entities''.

    SEC. 205. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

        Section 206(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33
    U.S.C. 2330(c)) is amended--
                (1) by striking ``Construction'' and inserting the
            following:
                ``(1) In general.--Construction''; and
                (2) by adding at the end the following:
                ``(2) Nonprofit entities.--Notwithstanding section 221 of
            the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), for any
            project carried out under this section, a non-Federal interest
            may include a nonprofit entity, with the consent of the
            affected local government.''.

    SEC. 206. BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED MATERIAL.

        Section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33
    U.S.C. 2326) is amended by adding at the end the following:
        ``(g) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221 of the Flood
    Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), for any project carried out
    under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a nonprofit
    entity, with the consent of the affected local government.''.

    SEC. 207. VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS BY STATES AND POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS.

        Section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (33 U.S.C. 701h), is amended
    by inserting ``or environmental restoration'' after ``flood control''.

    SEC. 208. RECREATION USER FEES.

        (a) Withholding of Amounts.--
                (1) In general.--During fiscal years 1999 through 2002, the
            Secretary may withhold from the special account established
            under section 4(i)(1)(A) of the Land and Water Conservation
            Fund Act of 1965 (16 U.S.C. 460l-6a(i)(1)(A)) 100 percent of
            the amount of receipts above a baseline of $34,000,000 per each
            fiscal year received from fees imposed at recreation sites
            under the administrative jurisdiction of the Department of the
            Army under section 4(b) of that Act (16 U.S.C. 460l-6a(b)).
                (2) Use.--The amounts withheld shall be retained by the
            Secretary and shall be available, without further Act of
            appropriation, for expenditure by the Secretary in accordance
            with subsection (b).
                (3) Availability.--The amounts withheld shall remain
            available until September 30, 2005.
        (b) Use of Amounts Withheld.--In order to increase the quality of
    the visitor experience at public recreational areas and to enhance the
    protection of resources, the amounts withheld under subsection (a) may
    be used only for--
                (1) repair and maintenance projects (including projects
            relating to health and safety);
                (2) interpretation;
                (3) signage;
                (4) habitat or facility enhancement;
                (5) resource preservation;
                (6) annual operation (including fee collection);
                (7) maintenance; and
                (8) law enforcement related to public use.
        (c) Availability.--Each amount withheld by the Secretary shall be
    available for expenditure, without further Act of appropriation, at the
    specific project from which the amount, above baseline, is collected.

    SEC. 209. WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT STUDIES FOR THE PACIFIC REGION.

        Section 444 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110
    Stat. 3747) is amended by striking ``interest of navigation'' and
    inserting ``interests of water resources development (including
    navigation, flood damage reduction, and environmental restoration)''.

    SEC. 210. MISSOURI AND MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVERS ENHANCEMENT PROJECT.

        (a) Definitions.--In this section:
                (1) Middle mississippi river.--The term ``middle
            Mississippi River'' means the reach of the Mississippi River
            from the mouth of the Ohio River (river mile 0, upper
            Mississippi River) to the mouth of the Missouri River (river
            mile 195).
                (2) Missouri river.--The term ``Missouri River'' means the
            main stem and floodplain of the Missouri River (including
            reservoirs) from its confluence with the Mississippi River at
            St. Louis, Missouri, to its headwaters near Three Forks,
            Montana.
                (3) Project.--The term ``project'' means the project
            authorized by this section.
        (b) Protection and Enhancement Activities.--
                (1) Plan.--
                        (A) Development.--Not later than 180 days after the
                    date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall
                    develop a plan for a project to protect and enhance
                    fish and wildlife habitat of the Missouri River and the
                    middle Mississippi River.
                        (B) Activities.--
                                (i) In general.--The plan shall provide for
                            such activities as are necessary to protect and
                            enhance fish and wildlife habitat without
                            adversely affecting--
                                        (I) the water-related needs of the
                                    region surrounding the Missouri River
                                    and the middle Mississippi River,
                                    including flood control, navigation,
                                    recreation, and enhancement of water
                                    supply; and
                                        (II) private property rights.
                                (ii) Required activities.--The plan shall
                            include--
                                        (I) modification and improvement of
                                    navigation training structures to
                                    protect and enhance fish and wildlife
                                    habitat;
                                        (II) modification and creation of
                                    side channels to protect and enhance
                                    fish and wildlife habitat;
                                        (III) restoration and creation of
                                    island fish and wildlife habitat;
                                        (IV) creation of riverine fish and
                                    wildlife habitat;
                                        (V) establishment of criteria for
                                    prioritizing the type and sequencing of
                                    activities based on cost-effectiveness
                                    and likelihood of success; and
                                        (VI) physical and biological
                                    monitoring for evaluating the success
                                    of the project, to be performed by the
                                    River Studies Center of the United
                                    States Geological Survey in Columbia,
                                    Missouri.
                (2) Implementation of activities.--
                        (A) In general.--Using funds made available to
                    carry out this section, the Secretary shall carry out
                    the activities described in the plan.
                        (B) Use of existing authority for unconstructed
                    features of the project.--Using funds made available to
                    the Secretary under other law, the Secretary shall
                    design and construct any feature of the project that
                    may be carried out using the authority of the Secretary
                    to modify an authorized project, if the Secretary
                    determines that the design and construction will--
                                (i) accelerate the completion of activities
                            to protect and enhance fish and wildlife
                            habitat of the Missouri River or the middle
                            Mississippi River; and
                                (ii) be compatible with the project
                            purposes described in this section.
        (c) Integration of Other Activities.--
                (1) In general.--In carrying out the activities described
            in subsection (b), the Secretary shall integrate the activities
            with other Federal, State, and tribal activities.
                (2) New authority.--Nothing in this section confers any new
            regulatory authority on any Federal or non-Federal entity that
            carries out any activity authorized by this section.
        (d) Public Participation.--In developing and carrying out the plan
    and the activities described in subsection (b), the Secretary shall
    provide for public review and comment in accordance with applicable
    Federal law, including--
                (1) providing advance notice of meetings;
                (2) providing adequate opportunity for public input and
            comment;
                (3) maintaining appropriate records; and
                (4) compiling a record of the proceedings of meetings.
        (e) Compliance With Applicable Law.--In carrying out the activities
    described in subsections (b) and (c), the Secretary shall comply with
    any applicable Federal law, including the National Environmental Policy
    Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
        (f) Cost Sharing.--
                (1) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of the cost
            of the project shall be 35 percent.
                (2) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of any 1
            activity described in subsection (b) shall not exceed
            $5,000,000.
                (3) Operation and maintenance.--The operation and
            maintenance of the project shall be a non-Federal
            responsibility.
        (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be
    appropriated to pay the Federal share of the cost of carrying out
    activities under this section $30,000,000 for the period of fiscal
    years 2000 and 2001.

    SEC. 211. OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF.

        (a) Sand, Gravel, and Shell.--Section 8(k)(2)(B) of the Outer
    Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337(k)(2)(B)) is amended in the
    second sentence by inserting before the period at the end the
    following: ``or any other non-Federal interest subject to an agreement
    entered into under section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42
    U.S.C. 1962d-5b)''.
        (b) Reimbursement for Local Interests.--Any amounts paid by non-
    Federal interests for beach erosion control, hurricane protection,
    shore protection, or storm damage reduction projects as a result of an
    assessment under section 8(k) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act
    (43 U.S.C. 1337(k)) shall be fully reimbursed.

    SEC. 212. ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING.

        Section 312(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33
    U.S.C. 1272(f)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                ``(6) Snake Creek, Bixby, Oklahoma.
                ``(7) Willamette River, Oregon.''.

    SEC. 213. BENEFIT OF PRIMARY FLOOD DAMAGES AVOIDED INCLUDED IN BENEFIT-
                  COST ANALYSIS.

        Section 308 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33
    U.S.C. 2318) is amended--
                (1) in the heading of subsection (a), by striking
            ``Benefit-Cost Analysis'' and inserting ``Elements Excluded
            From Cost-Benefit Analysis'';
                (2) by redesignating subsections (b) through (e) as
            subsections (c) through (f), respectively;
                (3) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
        ``(b) Elements Included in Cost-Benefit Analysis.--The Secretary
    shall include primary flood damages avoided in the benefit base for
    justifying Federal nonstructural flood damage reduction projects.'';
    and
                (4) in the first sentence of subsection (e) (as
            redesignated by paragraph (2)), by striking ``(b)'' and
            inserting ``(d)''.

    SEC. 214. CONTROL OF AQUATIC PLANT GROWTH.

        Section 104(a) of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C.
    610(a)) is amended--
                (1) by inserting ``Arundo dona,'' after ``water-
            hyacinth,''; and
                (2) by inserting ``tarmarix'' after ``melaleuca''.

    SEC. 215. ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE.

        Section 219(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106
    Stat. 4835) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                ``(19) Lake tahoe, california and nevada.--Regional water
            system for Lake Tahoe, California and Nevada.
                ``(20) Lancaster, california.--Fox Field Industrial
            Corridor water facilities, Lancaster, California.
                ``(21) San ramon, california.--San Ramon Valley recycled
            water project, San Ramon, California.''.

    SEC. 216. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT, RESTORATION, AND DEVELOPMENT.

        Section 503 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110
    Stat. 3756) is amended--
                (1) in subsection (d)--
                        (A) by striking paragraph (10) and inserting the
                    following:
                ``(10) Regional Atlanta Watershed, Atlanta, Georgia, and
            Lake Lanier of Forsyth and Hall Counties, Georgia.''; and
                        (B) by adding at the end the following:
                ``(14) Clear Lake watershed, California.
                ``(15) Fresno Slough watershed, California.
                ``(16) Hayward Marsh, Southern San Francisco Bay watershed,
            California.
                ``(17) Kaweah River watershed, California.
                ``(18) Lake Tahoe watershed, California and Nevada.
                ``(19) Malibu Creek watershed, California.
                ``(20) Truckee River basin, Nevada.
                ``(21) Walker River basin, Nevada.
                ``(22) Bronx River watershed, New York.
                ``(23) Catawba River watershed, North Carolina.'';
                (2) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and
                (3) by inserting after subsection (d) the following:
        ``(e) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the
    Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project
    undertaken under this section, with the consent of the affected local
    government, a non-Federal interest may include a nonprofit entity.''.

    SEC. 217. LAKES PROGRAM.

        Section 602(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100
    Stat. 4148) is amended--
                (1) in paragraph (15), by striking ``and'' at the end;
                (2) in paragraph (16), by striking the period at the end;
            and
                (3) by adding at the end the following:
                ``(17) Clear Lake, Lake County, California, removal of silt
            and aquatic growth and development of a sustainable weed and
            algae management program;
                ``(18) Flints Pond, Hollis, New Hampshire, removal of
            excessive aquatic vegetation; and
                ``(19) Osgood Pond, Milford, New Hampshire, removal of
            excessive aquatic vegetation.''.

    SEC. 218. SEDIMENTS DECONTAMINATION POLICY.

        Section 405 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33
    U.S.C. 2239 note; Public Law 102-580) is amended--
                (1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following:
                ``(4) Practical end-use products.--Technologies selected
            for demonstration at the pilot scale shall result in practical
            end-use products.
                ``(5) Assistance by the secretary.--The Secretary shall
            assist the project to ensure expeditious completion by
            providing sufficient quantities of contaminated dredged
            material to conduct the full-scale demonstrations to stated
            capacity.''; and
                (2) in subsection (c), by striking the first sentence and
            inserting the following: ``There is authorized to be
            appropriated to carry out this section a total of $22,000,000
            to complete technology testing, technology commercialization,
            and the development of full scale processing facilities within
            the New York/New Jersey Harbor.''.

    SEC. 219. DISPOSAL OF DREDGED MATERIAL ON BEACHES.

        (a) In General.--Section 145 of the Water Resources Development Act
    of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 426j) is amended in the first sentence by striking
    ``50'' and inserting ``35''.
        (b) Great Lakes Basin.--The Secretary shall work with the State of
    Ohio, other Great Lakes States, and political subdivisions of the
    States to fully implement and maximize beneficial reuse of dredged
    material as provided under section 145 of the Water Resources
    Development Act of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 426j).

    SEC. 220. FISH AND WILDLIFE MITIGATION.

        Section 906(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33
    U.S.C. 2283(e)) is amended by inserting after the second sentence the
    following: ``Not more than 80 percent of the non-Federal share of such
    first costs may be in kind, including a facility, supply, or service
    that is necessary to carry out the enhancement project.''.

    SEC. 221. REIMBURSEMENT OF NON-FEDERAL INTEREST.

        Section 211(e)(2)(A) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996
    (33 U.S.C. 701b-13(e)(2)(A)) is amended by striking ``subject to
    amounts being made available in advance in appropriations Acts'' and
    inserting ``subject to the availability of appropriations''.

    SEC. 222. NATIONAL CONTAMINATED SEDIMENT TASK FORCE.

        (a) Definition of Task Force.--In this section, the term ``Task
    Force'' means the National Contaminated Sediment Task Force established
    by section 502 of the National Contaminated Sediment Assessment and
    Management Act (33 U.S.C. 1271 note; Public Law 102-580).
        (b) Convening.--The Secretary and the Administrator shall convene
    the Task Force not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of
    this Act.
        (c) Reporting on Remedial Action.--
                (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of
            enactment of this Act, the Task Force shall submit to Congress
            a report on the status of remedial actions at aquatic sites in
            the areas described in paragraph (2).
                (2) Areas.--The report under paragraph (1) shall address
            remedial actions in--
                        (A) areas of probable concern identified in the
                    survey of data regarding aquatic sediment quality
                    required by section 503(a) of the National Contaminated
                    Sediment Assessment and Management Act (33 U.S.C.
                    1271);
                        (B) areas of concern within the Great Lakes, as
                    identified under section 118(f) of the Federal Water
                    Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1268(f));
                        (C) estuaries of national significance identified
                    under section 320 of the Federal Water Pollution
                    Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1330);
                        (D) areas for which remedial action has been
                    authorized under any of the Water Resources Development
                    Acts; and
                        (E) as appropriate, any other areas where sediment
                    contamination is identified by the Task Force.
                (3) Activities.--Remedial actions subject to reporting
            under this subsection include remedial actions under--
                        (A) the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
                    Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601
                    et seq.) or other Federal or State law containing
                    environmental remediation authority;
                        (B) any of the Water Resources Development Acts;
                        (C) section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution
                    Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344); or
                        (D) section 10 of the Act of March 3, 1899 (30
                    Stat. 1151, chapter 425).
                (4) Contents.--The report under paragraph (1) shall
            provide, with respect to each remedial action described in the
            report, a description of--
                        (A) the authorities and sources of funding for
                    conducting the remedial action;
                        (B) the nature and sources of the sediment
                    contamination, including volume and concentration,
                    where appropriate;
                        (C) the testing conducted to determine the nature
                    and extent of sediment contamination and to determine
                    whether the remedial action is necessary;
                        (D) the action levels or other factors used to
                    determine that the remedial action is necessary;
                        (E) the nature of the remedial action planned or
                    undertaken, including the levels of protection of
                    public health and the environment to be achieved by the
                    remedial action;
                        (F) the ultimate disposition of any material
                    dredged as part of the remedial action;
                        (G) the status of projects and the obstacles or
                    barriers to prompt conduct of the remedial action; and
                        (H) contacts and sources of further information
                    concerning the remedial action.

    SEC. 223. GREAT LAKES BASIN PROGRAM.

        (a) Strategic Plans.--
                (1) In general.--Not later than 18 months after the date of
            enactment of this Act, and every 2 years thereafter, the
            Secretary shall report to Congress on a plan for programs of
            the Corps of Engineers in the Great Lakes basin.
                (2) Contents.--The plan shall include details of the
            projected environmental and navigational projects in the Great
            Lakes basin, including--
                        (A) navigational maintenance and operations for
                    commercial and recreational vessels;
                        (B) environmental restoration activities;
                        (C) water level maintenance activities;
                        (D) technical and planning assistance to States and
                    remedial action planning committees;
                        (E) sediment transport analysis, sediment
                    management planning, and activities to support
                    prevention of excess sediment loadings;
                        (F) flood damage reduction and shoreline erosion
                    prevention;
                        (G) all other activities of the Corps of Engineers;
                    and
                        (H) an analysis of factors limiting use of programs
                    and authorities of the Corps of Engineers in existence
                    on the date of enactment of this Act in the Great Lakes
                    basin, including the need for new or modified
                    authorities.
        (b) Great Lakes Biohydrological Information.--
                (1) Inventory.--
                        (A) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the
                    date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall
                    request each Federal agency that may possess
                    information relevant to the Great Lakes biohydrological
                    system to provide an inventory of all such information
                    in the possession of the agency.
                        (B) Relevant information.--For the purpose of
                    subparagraph (A), relevant information includes
                    information on--
                                (i) ground and surface water hydrology;
                                (ii) natural and altered tributary
                            dynamics;
                                (iii) biological aspects of the system
                            influenced by and influencing water quantity
                            and water movement;
                                (iv) meteorological projections and weather
                            impacts on Great Lakes water levels; and
                                (v) other Great Lakes biohydrological
                            system data relevant to sustainable water use
                            management.
                (2) Report.--
                        (A) In general.--Not later than 18 months after the
                    date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in
                    consultation with the States, Indian tribes, and
                    Federal agencies, and after requesting information from
                    the provinces and the federal government of Canada,
                    shall--
                                (i) compile the inventories of information;
                                (ii) analyze the information for
                            consistency and gaps; and
                                (iii) submit to Congress, the International
                            Joint Commission, and the Great Lakes States a
                            report that includes recommendations on ways to
                            improve the information base on the
                            biohydrological dynamics of the Great Lakes
                            ecosystem as a whole, so as to support
                            environmentally sound decisions regarding
                            diversions and consumptive uses of Great Lakes
                            water.
                        (B) Recommendations.--The recommendations in the
                    report under subparagraph (A) shall include
                    recommendations relating to the resources and funds
                    necessary for implementing improvement of the
                    information base.
                        (C) Considerations.--In developing the report under
                    subparagraph (A), the Secretary, in cooperation with
                    the Secretary of State, the Secretary of
                    Transportation, and other relevant agencies as
                    appropriate, shall consider and report on the status of
                    the issues described and recommendations made in--
                                (i) the Report of the International Joint
                            Commission to the Governments of the United
                            States and Canada under the 1977 reference
                            issued in 1985; and
                                (ii) the 1993 Report of the International
                            Joint Commission to the Governments of Canada
                            and the United States on Methods of Alleviating
                            Adverse Consequences of Fluctuating Water
                            Levels in the Great Lakes St. Lawrence Basin.
        (c) Great Lakes Recreational Boating.--Not later than 18 months
    after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall, using
    information and studies in existence on the date of enactment of this
    Act to the maximum extent practicable, and in cooperation with the
    Great Lakes States, submit to Congress a report detailing the economic
    benefits of recreational boating in the Great Lakes basin, particularly
    at harbors benefiting from operation and maintenance projects of the
    Corps of Engineers.
        (d) Cooperation.--In undertaking activities under this section, the
    Secretary shall--
                (1) encourage public participation; and
                (2) cooperate, and, as appropriate, collaborate, with Great
            Lakes States, tribal governments, and Canadian federal,
            provincial, tribal governments.
        (e) Water Use Activities and Policies.--The Secretary may provide
    technical assistance to the Great Lakes States to develop interstate
    guidelines to improve the consistency and efficiency of State-level
    water use activities and policies in the Great Lakes basin.
        (f) Cost Sharing.--The Secretary may seek and accept funds from
    non-Federal entities to be used to pay up to 25 percent of the cost of
    carrying out subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e).

    SEC. 224. PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT.

        Section 1135(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33
    U.S.C. 2309a(c)) is amended--
                (1) by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting the
            following:
                ``(1) In general.--The Secretary''; and
                (2) by adding at the end the following:
                ``(2) Control of sea lamprey.--Congress finds that--
                        ``(A) the Great Lakes navigation system has been
                    instrumental in the spread of sea lamprey and the
                    associated impacts to its fishery; and
                        ``(B) the use of the authority under this
                    subsection for control of sea lamprey at any Great
                    Lakes basin location is appropriate.''.

    SEC. 225. WATER QUALITY, ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, RECREATION, FISH AND
                  WILDLIFE, FLOOD CONTROL, AND NAVIGATION.

        (a) In General.--The Secretary may investigate, study, evaluate,
    and report on--
                (1) water quality, environmental quality, recreation, fish
            and wildlife, flood control, and navigation in the western Lake
            Erie watershed, including the watersheds of the Maumee River,
            Ottawa River, and Portage River in the States of Indiana, Ohio,
            and Michigan; and
                (2) measures to improve water quality, environmental
            quality, recreation, fish and wildlife, flood control, and
            navigation in the western Lake Erie basin.
        (b) Cooperation.--In carrying out studies and investigations under
    subsection (a), the Secretary shall cooperate with Federal, State, and
    local agencies and nongovernmental organizations to ensure full
    consideration of all views and requirements of all interrelated
    programs that those agencies may develop independently or in
    coordination with the Corps of Engineers.

    SEC. 226. IRRIGATION DIVERSION PROTECTION AND FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT
                  ASSISTANCE.

        The Secretary may provide technical planning and design assistance
    to non-Federal interests and may conduct other site-specific studies to
    formulate and evaluate fish screens, fish passages devices, and other
    measures to decrease the incidence of juvenile and adult fish
    inadvertently entering into irrigation systems. Measures shall be
    developed in cooperation with Federal and State resource agencies and
    not impair the continued withdrawal of water for irrigation purposes.
    In providing such assistance priority shall be given based on the
    objectives of the Endangered Species Act, cost-effectiveness, and the
    potential for reducing fish mortality. Non-Federal interests shall
    agree by contract to contribute 50 percent of the cost of such
    assistance. Not more than one-half of such non-Federal contribution may
    be made by the provision of services, materials, supplies, or other in-
    kind services. No construction activities are authorized by this
    section. Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this
    section, the Secretary shall report to Congress on fish mortality
    caused by irrigation water intake devices, appropriate measures to
    reduce mortality, the extent to which such measures are currently being
    employed in the arid States, the construction costs associated with
    such measures, and the appropriate Federal role, if any, to encourage
    the use of such measures.

    SEC. 227. SMALL STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECTS.

        Section 3 of the Act of August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g), is
    amended by striking ``$2,000,000'' and inserting ``$3,000,000''.

    SEC. 228. SHORE DAMAGE PREVENTION OR MITIGATION.

        Section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426(i))
    is amended--
                (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``The Secretary''
            and inserting ``(a) In General.--The Secretary'';
                (2) in the second sentence, by striking ``The costs'' and
            inserting the following:
        ``(b) Cost Sharing.--The costs'';
                (3) in the third sentence--
                        (A) by striking ``No such'' and inserting the
                    following:
        ``(c) Requirement for Specific Authorization.--No such''; and
                        (B) by striking ``$2,000,000'' and inserting
                    ``$5,000,000''; and
                (4) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(d) Coordination.--The Secretary shall--
                ``(1) coordinate the implementation of the measures under
            this section with other Federal and non-Federal shore
            protection projects in the same geographic area; and
                ``(2) to the extent practicable, combine mitigation
            projects with other shore protection projects in the same area
            into a comprehensive regional project.''.

    SEC. 229. ATLANTIC COAST OF NEW YORK.

        Section 404(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106
    Stat. 4863) is amended by striking ``$1,400,000 for each of fiscal
    years 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997'' and inserting ``$2,500,000''.

    SEC. 230. ACCELERATED ADOPTION OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES FOR
                  CONTAMINATED SEDIMENTS.

        Section 8 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (33 U.S.C.
    2314) is amended--
                (1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections
            (c) and (d), respectively; and
                (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
        ``(b) Accelerated Adoption of Innovative Technologies for
    Management of Contaminated Sediments.--
                ``(1) Test projects.--The Secretary shall approve an
            appropriate number of projects to test, under actual field
            conditions, innovative technologies for environmentally sound
            management of contaminated sediments.
                ``(2) Demonstration projects.--The Secretary may approve an
            appropriate number of projects to demonstrate innovative
            technologies that have been pilot tested under paragraph (1).
                ``(3) Conduct of projects.--Each pilot project under
            paragraph (1) and demonstration project under paragraph (2)
            shall be conducted by a university with proven expertise in the
            research and development of contaminated sediment treatment
            technologies and innovative applications using waste
            materials.''.

                     TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

    SEC. 301. DREDGING OF SALT PONDS IN THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND.

        The Secretary may acquire for the State of Rhode Island a dredge
    and associated equipment with the capacity to dredge approximately 100
    cubic yards per hour for use by the State in dredging salt ponds in the
    State.

    SEC. 302. UPPER SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN, PENNSYLVANIA AND NEW YORK.

        Section 567(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110
    Stat. 3787) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                ``(3) The Chemung River watershed, New York, at an
            estimated Federal cost of $5,000,000.''.

    SEC. 303. SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS.

        Section 102 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110
    Stat. 3668) is amended--
                (1) by redesignating paragraphs (15) through (22) as
            paragraphs (16) through (23), respectively;
                (2) by inserting after paragraph (14) the following:
                ``(15) Repaupo creek and delaware river, gloucester county,
            new jersey.--Project for tidegate and levee improvements for
            Repaupo Creek and the Delaware River, Gloucester County, New
            Jersey.''; and
                (3) by adding at the end the following:
                ``(24) Irondequoit creek, new york.--Project for flood
            control, Irondequoit Creek watershed, New York.
                ``(25) Tioga county, pennsylvania.--Project for flood
            control, Tioga River and Cowanesque River and their
            tributaries, Tioga County, Pennsylvania.''.

    SEC. 304. SMALL NAVIGATION PROJECTS.

        Section 104 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110
    Stat. 3669) is amended--
                (1) by redesignating paragraphs (9) through (12) as
            paragraphs (11) through (14), respectively; and
                (2) by inserting after paragraph (8) the following:
                ``(9) Fortescue inlet, delaware bay, new jersey.--Project
            for navigation for Fortescue Inlet, Delaware Bay, New Jersey.
                ``(10) Braddock bay, greece, new york.--Project for
            navigation, Braddock Bay, Greece, New York.''.

    SEC. 305. STREAMBANK PROTECTION PROJECTS.

        (a) Arctic Ocean, Barrow, Alaska.--The Secretary shall evaluate
    and, if justified under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33
    U.S.C. 701r), carry out storm damage reduction and coastal erosion
    measures at the town of Barrow, Alaska.
        (b) Saginaw River, Bay City, Michigan.--The Secretary may construct
    appropriate control structures in areas along the Saginaw River in the
    city of Bay City, Michigan, under authority of section 14 of the Flood
    Control Act of 1946 (33 Stat. 701r).
        (c) Yellowstone River, Billings, Montana.--The streambank
    protection project at Coulson Park, along the Yellowstone River,
    Billings, Montana, shall be eligible for assistance under section 14 of
    the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r).
        (d) Monongahela River, Point Marion, Pennsylvania.--The Secretary
    shall evaluate and, if justified under section 14 of the Flood Control
    Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r), carry out streambank erosion control
    measures along the Monongahela River at the borough of Point Marion,
    Pennsylvania.

    SEC. 306. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, SPRINGFIELD, OREGON.

        Under section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996
    (33 U.S.C. 2330), the Secretary shall conduct measures to address water
    quality, water flows, and fish habitat restoration in the historic
    Springfield, Oregon, millrace through the reconfiguration of the
    existing millpond, if the Secretary determines that harmful impacts
    have occurred as the result of a previously constructed flood control
    project by the Corps of Engineers.

    SEC. 307. GUILFORD AND NEW HAVEN, CONNECTICUT.

        The Secretary shall expeditiously complete the activities
    authorized under section 346 of the Water Resources Development Act of
    1992 (106 Stat. 4858), including activities associated with Sluice
    Creek in Guilford, Connecticut, and Lighthouse Point Park in New Haven,
    Connecticut.

    SEC. 308. FRANCIS BLAND FLOODWAY DITCH.

        (a) Redesignation.--The project for flood control, Eight Mile
    Creek, Paragould, Arkansas, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water
    Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4112) and known as ``Eight
    Mile Creek, Paragould, Arkansas'', shall be known and designated as the
    ``Francis Bland Floodway Ditch''.
        (b) Legal References.--Any reference in any law, map, regulation,
    document, paper, or other record of the United States to the project
    and creek referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a
    reference to the Francis Bland Floodway Ditch.

    SEC. 309. CALOOSAHATCHEE RIVER BASIN, FLORIDA.

        Section 528(e)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996
    (110 Stat. 3770) is amended in the first sentence by inserting before
    the period at the end the following: ``, including potential land
    acquisition in the Caloosahatchee River basin or other areas''.

    SEC. 310. CUMBERLAND, MARYLAND, FLOOD PROJECT MITIGATION.

        (a) In General.--The project for flood control and other purposes,
    Cumberland, Maryland, authorized by section 5 of the Act of June 22,
    1936 (commonly known as the ``Flood Control Act of 1936'') (49 Stat.
    1574, chapter 688), is modified to authorize the Secretary to
    undertake, as a separate part of the project, restoration of the
    historic Chesapeake and Ohio Canal substantially in accordance with the
    Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historic Park, Cumberland, Maryland,
    Rewatering Design Analysis, dated February 1998, at a total cost of
    $15,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $9,750,000 and an
    estimated non-Federal cost of $5,250,000.
        (b) In-Kind Services.--The non-Federal interest for the restoration
    project under subsection (a)--
                (1) may provide all or a portion of the non-Federal share
            of project costs in the form of in-kind services; and
                (2) shall receive credit toward the non-Federal share of
            project costs for design and construction work performed by the
            non-Federal interest before execution of a project cooperation
            agreement and for land, easements, and rights-of-way required
            for the restoration and acquired by the non-Federal interest
            before execution of such an agreement.
        (c) Operation and Maintenance.--The operation and maintenance of
    the restoration project under subsection (a) shall be the full
    responsibility of the National Park Service.

    SEC. 311. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA.

        Section 5(b)(3)(C)(i) of the Act of August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C.
    426h), is amended by inserting before the semicolon the following: ``,
    including the city of Miami Beach, Florida''.

    SEC. 312. SARDIS RESERVOIR, OKLAHOMA.

        (a) In General.--The Secretary shall accept from the State of
    Oklahoma or an agent of the State an amount, as determined under
    subsection (b), as prepayment of 100 percent of the water supply cost
    obligation of the State under Contract No. DACW56-74-JC-0314 for water
    supply storage at Sardis Reservoir, Oklahoma.
        (b) Determination of Amount.--The amount to be paid by the State of
    Oklahoma under subsection (a) shall be subject to adjustment in
    accordance with accepted discount purchase methods for Government
    properties as determined by an independent accounting firm designated
    by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget.
        (c) Effect.--Nothing in this section shall otherwise affect any of
    the rights or obligations of the parties to the contract referred to in
    subsection (a).

    SEC. 313. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER AND ILLINOIS WATERWAY SYSTEM
                  NAVIGATION MODERNIZATION.

        (a) Findings.--Congress finds that--
                (1) exports are necessary to ensure job creation and an
            improved standard of living for the people of the United
            States;
                (2) the ability of producers of goods in the United States
            to compete in the international marketplace depends on a modern
            and efficient transportation network;
                (3) a modern and efficient waterway system is a
            transportation option necessary to provide United States
    shippers a safe, reliable, and competitive means to win foreign markets
    in an increasingly competitive international marketplace;
                (4) the need to modernize is heightened because the United
            States is at risk of losing its competitive edge as a result of
            the priority that foreign competitors are placing on
            modernizing their own waterway systems;
                (5) growing export demand projected over the coming decades
            will force greater demands on the waterway system of the United
            States and increase the cost to the economy if the system
            proves inadequate to satisfy growing export opportunities;
                (6) the locks and dams on the upper Mississippi River and
            Illinois River waterway system were built in the 1930s and have
            some of the highest average delays to commercial tows in the
            country;
                (7) inland barges carry freight at the lowest unit cost
            while offering an alternative to truck and rail transportation
            that is environmentally sound, is energy efficient, is safe,
            causes little congestion, produces little air or noise
            pollution, and has minimal social impact; and
                (8) it should be the policy of the Corps of Engineers to
            pursue aggressively modernization of the waterway system
            authorized by Congress to promote the relative competitive
            position of the United States in the international marketplace.
        (b) Preconstruction Engineering and Design.--In accordance with the
    Upper Mississippi River-Illinois Waterway System Navigation Study, the
    Secretary shall proceed immediately to prepare engineering design,
    plans, and specifications for extension of locks 20, 21, 22, 24, 25 on
    the Mississippi River and the LaGrange and Peoria Locks on the Illinois
    River, to provide lock chambers 110 feet in width and 1,200 feet in
    length, so that construction can proceed immediately upon completion of
    studies and authorization of projects by Congress.

    SEC. 314. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER MANAGEMENT.

        Section 1103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33
    U.S.C. 652) is amended--
                (1) in subsection (e)--
                        (A) by striking ``(e)'' and all that follows
                    through the end of paragraph (2) and inserting the
                    following:
        ``(e) Undertakings.--
                ``(1) In general.--
                        ``(A) Authority.--The Secretary, in consultation
                    with the Secretary of the Interior and the States of
                    Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin, is
                    authorized to undertake--
                                ``(i) a program for the planning,
                            construction, and evaluation of measures for
                            fish and wildlife habitat rehabilitation and
                            enhancement; and
                                ``(ii) implementation of a program of long-
                            term resource monitoring, computerized data
                            inventory and analysis, and applied research.
                        ``(B) Requirements for projects.--Each project
                    carried out under subparagraph (A)(i) shall--
                                ``(i) to the maximum extent practicable,
                            simulate natural river processes;
                                ``(ii) include an outreach and education
                            component; and
                                ``(iii) on completion of the assessment
                            under subparagraph (D), address identified
                            habitat and natural resource needs.
                        ``(C) Advisory committee.--In carrying out
                    subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall create an
                    independent technical advisory committee to review
                    projects, monitoring plans, and habitat and natural
                    resource needs assessments.
                        ``(D) Habitat and natural resource needs
                    assessment.--
                                ``(i) Authority.--The Secretary is
                            authorized to undertake a systemic, river
                            reach, and pool scale assessment of habitat and
                            natural resource needs to serve as a blueprint
                            to guide habitat rehabilitation and long-term
                            resource monitoring.
                                ``(ii) Data.--The habitat and natural
                            resource needs assessment shall, to the maximum
                            extent practicable, use data in existence at
                            the time of the assessment.
                                ``(iii) Timing.--The Secretary shall
                            complete a habitat and natural resource needs
                            assessment not later than 3 years after the
                            date of enactment of this subparagraph.
                ``(2) Reports.--On December 31, 2005, in consultation with
            the Secretary of the Interior and the States of Illinois, Iowa,
            Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin, the Secretary shall prepare
            and submit to Congress a report that--
                        ``(A) contains an evaluation of the programs
                    described in paragraph (1);
                        ``(B) describes the accomplishments of each
                    program;
                        ``(C) includes results of a habitat and natural
                    resource needs assessment; and
                        ``(D) identifies any needed adjustments in the
                    authorization under paragraph (1) or the authorized
                    appropriations under paragraphs (3), (4), and (5).'';
                        (B) in paragraph (3)--
                                (i) by striking ``paragraph (1)(A)'' and
                            inserting ``paragraph (1)(A)(i)''; and
                                (ii) by striking ``Secretary not to
                            exceed'' and all that follows and inserting
                            ``Secretary not to exceed $22,750,000 for each
                            of fiscal years 1999 through 2009.'';
                        (C) in paragraph (4)--
                                (i) by striking ``paragraph (1)(B)'' and
                            inserting ``paragraph (1)(A)(ii)''; and
                                (ii) by striking ``$7,680,000'' and all
                            that follows and inserting ``$10,420,000 for
                            each of fiscal years 1999 through 2009.'';
                        (D) by striking paragraphs (5) and (6) and
                    inserting the following:
                ``(5) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized
            to be appropriated to carry out paragraph (1)(C) not to exceed
            $350,000 for each of fiscal years 1999 through 2009.
                ``(6) Transfer of amounts.--
                        ``(A) In general.--For each fiscal year beginning
                    after September 30, 1992, the Secretary, in
                    consultation with the Secretary of the Interior and the
                    States of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and
                    Wisconsin, may transfer appropriated amounts between
                    the programs under clauses (i) and (ii) of paragraph
                    (1)(A) and paragraph (1)(C).
                        ``(B) Apportionment of costs.--In carrying out
                    paragraph (1)(D), the Secretary may apportion the costs
                    equally between the programs authorized by paragraph
                    (1)(A).''; and
                        (E) in paragraph (7)--
                                (i) in subparagraph (A)--
                                        (I) by inserting ``(i)'' after
                                    ``paragraph (1)(A)''; and
                                        (II) by inserting before the period
                                    at the end the following: ``and, in the
                                    case of any project requiring non-
                                    Federal cost sharing, the non-Federal
                                    share of the cost of the project shall
                                    be 35 percent''; and
                                (ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking
                            ``paragraphs (1)(B) and (1)(C) of this
                            subsection'' and inserting ``paragraph
                            (1)(A)(ii)'';
                (2) in subsection (f)(2)--
                        (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``(A)''; and
                        (B) by striking subparagraph (B); and
                (3) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(k) St. Louis Area Urban Wildlife Habitat.--The Secretary shall
    investigate and, if appropriate, carry out restoration of urban
    wildlife habitat, with a special emphasis on the establishment of
    greenways in the St. Louis, Missouri, area and surrounding
    communities.''.

    SEC. 315. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR COLUMBIA AND SNAKE
                  RIVERS SALMON SURVIVAL.

        Section 511 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (16
    U.S.C. 3301 note; Public Law 104-303) is amended by striking subsection
    (a) and all that follows and inserting the following:
        ``(a) Salmon Survival Activities.--
                ``(1) In general.--In conjunction with the Secretary of
            Commerce and Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary shall
            accelerate ongoing research and development activities, and may
            carry out or participate in additional research and development
            activities, for the purpose of developing innovative methods
            and technologies for improving the survival of salmon,
            especially salmon in the Columbia/Snake River Basin.
                ``(2) Accelerated activities.--Accelerated research and
            development activities referred to in paragraph (1) may include
            research and development related to--
                        ``(A) impacts from water resources projects and
                    other impacts on salmon life cycles;
                        ``(B) juvenile and adult salmon passage;
                        ``(C) light and sound guidance systems;
                        ``(D) surface-oriented collector systems;
                        ``(E) transportation mechanisms; and
                        ``(F) dissolved gas monitoring and abatement.
                ``(3) Additional activities.--Additional research and
            development activities referred to in paragraph (1) may include
            research and development related to--
                        ``(A) studies of juvenile salmon survival in
                    spawning and rearing areas;
                        ``(B) estuary and near-ocean juvenile and adult
                    salmon survival;
                        ``(C) impacts on salmon life cycles from sources
                    other than water resources projects;
                        ``(D) cryopreservation of fish gametes and
                    formation of a germ plasm repository for threatened and
                    endangered populations of native fish; and
                        ``(E) other innovative technologies and actions
                    intended to improve fish survival, including the
                    survival of resident fish.
                ``(4) Coordination.--The Secretary shall coordinate any
            activities carried out under this subsection with appropriate
            Federal, State, and local agencies, affected Indian tribes, and
            the Northwest Power Planning Council.
                ``(5) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date of
            enactment of this section, the Secretary shall submit to
            Congress a report on the research and development activities
            carried out under this subsection, including any
            recommendations of the Secretary concerning the research and
            development activities.
                ``(6) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized
            to be appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out research and
            development activities under paragraph (3).
        ``(b) Advanced Turbine Development.--
                ``(1) In general.--In conjunction with the Secretary of
            Energy, the Secretary shall accelerate efforts toward
            developing and installing in Corps of Engineers-operated dams
            innovative, efficient, and environmentally safe hydropower
            turbines, including design of fish-friendly turbines, for use
            on the Columbia/Snake River hydrosystem.
                ``(2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized
            to be appropriated $35,000,000 to carry out this subsection.
        ``(c) Management of Predation on Columbia/Snake River System Native
    Fishes.--
                ``(1) Nesting avian predators.--In conjunction with the
            Secretary of Commerce and the Secretary of the Interior, and
            consistent with a management plan to be developed by the United
            States Fish and Wildlife Service, the Secretary shall carry out
            methods to reduce nesting populations of avian predators on
            dredge spoil islands in the Columbia River under the
            jurisdiction of the Secretary.
                ``(2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized
            to be appropriated $1,000,000 to carry out research and
            development activities under this subsection.
        ``(d) Implementation.--Nothing in this section affects the
    authority of the Secretary to implement the results of the research and
    development carried out under this section or any other law.''.

    SEC. 316. NINE MILE RUN HABITAT RESTORATION, PENNSYLVANIA.

        The Secretary may credit against the non-Federal share such costs
    as are incurred by the non-Federal interests in preparing environmental
    and other preconstruction documentation for the habitat restoration
    project, Nine Mile Run, Pennsylvania, if the Secretary determines that
    the documentation is integral to the project.

    SEC. 317. LARKSPUR FERRY CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.

        The Secretary shall work with the Secretary of Transportation on a
    proposed solution to carry out the project to maintain the Larkspur
    Ferry Channel, Larkspur, California, authorized by section 601(d) of
    the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4148).

    SEC. 318. COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD IMPACT-RESPONSE MODELING SYSTEM.

        (a) In General.--The Secretary may study and implement a
    Comprehensive Flood Impact-Response Modeling System for the Coralville
    Reservoir and the Iowa River watershed, Iowa.
        (b) Study.--The study shall include--
                (1) an evaluation of the combined hydrologic, geomorphic,
            environmental, economic, social, and recreational impacts of
            operating strategies within the watershed;
                (2) creation of an integrated, dynamic flood impact model;
            and
                (3) the development of a rapid response system to be used
            during flood and emergency situations.
        (c) Report to Congress.--Not later than 5 years after the date of
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit a report to
    Congress on the results of the study and modeling system and such
    recommendations as the Secretary determines to be appropriate.
        (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be
    appropriated a total of $2,250,000 to carry out this section.

    SEC. 319. STUDY REGARDING INNOVATIVE FINANCING FOR SMALL AND MEDIUM-
                  SIZED PORTS.

        (a) Study.--The Comptroller General of the United States shall
    conduct a study and analysis of various alternatives for innovative
    financing of future construction, operation, and maintenance of
    projects in small and medium-sized ports.
        (b) Report.--Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of
    this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the Committee on
    Environment and Public Works of the Senate and Committee on
    Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and
    the results of the study and any related legislative recommendations
    for consideration by Congress.

    SEC. 320. CANDY LAKE PROJECT, OSAGE COUNTY, OKLAHOMA.

        (a) Definitions.--In this section:
                (1) Fair market value.--The term ``fair market value''
            means the amount for which a willing buyer would purchase and a
            willing seller would sell a parcel of land, as determined by a
            qualified, independent land appraiser.
                (2) Previous owner of land.--The term ``previous owner of
            land'' means a person (including a corporation) that conveyed,
            or a descendant of a deceased individual who conveyed, land to
            the Corps of Engineers for use in the Candy Lake project in
            Osage County, Oklahoma.
                (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary
            of the Army.
        (b) Land Conveyances.--
                (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey, in accordance
            with this section, all right, title, and interest of the United
            States in and to the land acquired by the United States for the
            Candy Lake project in Osage County, Oklahoma.
                (2) Previous owners of land.--
                        (A) In general.--The Secretary shall give a
                    previous owner of land first option to purchase the
                    land described in paragraph (1).
                        (B) Application.--
                                (i) In general.--A previous owner of land
                            that desires to purchase the land described in
                            paragraph (1) that was owned by the previous
                            owner of land, or by the individual from whom
                            the previous owner of land is descended, shall
                            file an application to purchase the land with
                            the Secretary not later than 180 days after the
                            official date of notice to the previous owner
                            of land under subsection (c).
                                (ii) First to file has first option.--If
                            more than 1 application is filed for a parcel
                            of land described in paragraph (1), first
                            options to purchase the parcel of land shall be
                            allotted in the order in which applications for
                            the parcel of land were filed.
                        (C) Identification of previous owners of land.--As
                    soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this
                    Act, the Secretary shall, to the extent practicable,
                    identify each previous owner of land.
                        (D) Consideration.--Consideration for land conveyed
                    under this subsection shall be the fair market value of
                    the land.
                (3) Disposal.--Any land described in paragraph (1) for
            which an application has not been filed under paragraph (2)(B)
            within the applicable time period shall be disposed of in
            accordance with law.
                (4) Extinguishment of easements.--All flowage easements
            acquired by the United States for use in the Candy Lake project
            in Osage County, Oklahoma, are extinguished.
        (c) Notice.--
                (1) In general.--The Secretary shall notify--
                        (A) each person identified as a previous owner of
                    land under subsection (b)(2)(C), not later than 90 days
                    after identification, by United States mail; and
                        (B) the general public, not later than 90 days
                    after the date of enactment of this Act, by publication
                    in the Federal Register.
                (2) Contents of notice.--Notice under this subsection shall
            include--
                        (A) a copy of this section;
                        (B) information sufficient to separately identify
                    each parcel of land subject to this section; and
                        (C) specification of the fair market value of each
                    parcel of land subject to this section.
                (3) Official date of notice.--The official date of notice
            under this subsection shall be the later of--
                        (A) the date on which actual notice is mailed; or
                        (B) the date of publication of the notice in the
                    Federal Register.

    SEC. 321. SALCHA RIVER AND PILEDRIVER SLOUGH, FAIRBANKS, ALASKA.

        The Secretary shall evaluate and, if justified under section 205 of
    the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), carry out flood damage
    reduction measures along the lower Salcha River and on Piledriver
    Slough, from its headwaters at the mouth of the Salcha River to the
    Chena Lakes Flood Control Project, in the vicinity of Fairbanks,
    Alaska, to protect against surface water flooding.

    SEC. 322. EYAK RIVER, CORDOVA, ALASKA.

        The Secretary shall evaluate and, if justified under section 205 of
    the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), carry out flood damage
    reduction measures along the Eyak River at the town of Cordova, Alaska.

    SEC. 323. NORTH PADRE ISLAND STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL
                  RESTORATION PROJECT.

        The Secretary shall carry out a project for ecosystem restoration
    and storm damage reduction at North Padre Island, Corpus Christi Bay,
    Texas, at a total estimated cost of $30,000,000, with an estimated
    Federal cost of $19,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
    $10,500,000, if the Secretary finds that the work is technically sound,
    environmentally acceptable, and economically justified. The Secretary
    shall make such a finding not later than 270 days after the date of
    enactment of this Act.

    SEC. 324. KANOPOLIS LAKE, KANSAS.

        (a) Water Supply.--
                (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of
            enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in cooperation with the
            State of Kansas or another non-Federal interest, shall complete
            a water supply reallocation study at the project for flood
            control, Kanopolis Lake, Kansas, as a basis on which the
            Secretary shall enter into negotiations with the State of
            Kansas or another non-Federal interest for the terms and
            conditions of a reallocation of the water supply.
                (2) Options.--The negotiations for storage reallocation
            shall include the following options for evaluation by all
            parties:
                        (A) Financial terms of storage reallocation.
                        (B) Protection of future Federal water releases
                    from Kanopolis Dam, consistent with State water law, to
                    ensure that the benefits expected from releases are
                    provided.
                        (C) Potential establishment of a water assurance
                    district consistent with other such districts
                    established by the State of Kansas.
                        (D) Protection of existing project purposes at
                    Kanopolis Dam to include flood control, recreation, and
                    fish and wildlife.
        (b) In-Kind Credit.--
                (1) In general.--The Secretary may negotiate a credit for a
            portion of the financial repayment to the Federal Government
            for work performed by the State of Kansas, or another non-
            Federal interest, on land adjacent or in close proximity to the
            project, if the work provides a benefit to the project.
                (2) Work included.--The work for which credit may be
            granted may include watershed protection and enhancement,
            including wetland construction and ecosystem restoration.

    SEC. 325. NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED.

        Section 552(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110
    Stat. 3780) is amended by striking ``for the project to be carried out
    with such assistance'' and inserting ``, or a public entity designated
    by the State director, to carry out the project with such assistance,
    subject to the project's meeting the certification requirement of
    subsection (c)(1)''.

    SEC. 326. CITY OF CHARLEVOIX REIMBURSEMENT, MICHIGAN.

        The Secretary shall review and, if consistent with authorized
    project purposes, reimburse the city of Charlevoix, Michigan, for the
    Federal share of costs associated with construction of the new
    revetment connection to the Federal navigation project at Charlevoix
    Harbor, Michigan.

    SEC. 327. HAMILTON DAM FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, MICHIGAN.

        The Secretary may construct the Hamilton Dam flood control project,
    Michigan, under authority of section 205 of the Flood Control Act of
    1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).

    SEC. 328. HOLES CREEK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, OHIO.

        (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the
    non-Federal share of project costs for the project for flood control,
    Holes Creek, Ohio, shall not exceed the sum of--
                (1) the total amount projected as the non-Federal share as
            of September 30, 1996, in the Project Cooperation Agreement
            executed on that date; and
                (2) 100 percent of the amount of any increases in the cost
            of the locally preferred plan over the cost estimated in the
            Project Cooperation Agreement.
        (b) Reimbursement.--The Secretary shall reimburse the non-Federal
    interest any amount paid by the non-Federal interest in excess of the
    non-Federal share.

    SEC. 329. OVERFLOW MANAGEMENT FACILITY, RHODE ISLAND.

        Section 585(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110
    Stat. 3791) is amended by striking ``river'' and inserting ``sewer''.

    SEC. 330. ANACOSTIA RIVER AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION, DISTRICT OF
                  COLUMBIA AND MARYLAND.

        The Secretary may use the balance of funds appropriated for the
    improvement of the environment as part of the Anacostia River Flood
    Control and Navigation Project under section 1135 of the Water
    Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a) to construct
    aquatic ecosystem restoration projects in the Anacostia River watershed
    under section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33
    U.S.C. 2330).

    SEC. 331. EVERGLADES AND SOUTH FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

        Subparagraphs (B) and (C)(i) of section 528(b)(3) of the Water
    Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3769) are amended by
    striking ``1999'' and inserting ``2003''.