[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 507 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.507

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
   the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine


                                 An Act


 
  To provide for the conservation and development of water and related 
  resources, to authorize the United States Army Corps of Engineers to 
construct various projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the 
                 United States, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999''.
    (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents of this Act is as 
follows:

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Definition of Secretary.

                    TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

Sec. 101. Project authorizations.
Sec. 102. Small flood control projects.
Sec. 103. Small bank stabilization projects.
Sec. 104. Small navigation projects.
Sec. 105. Small projects for improvement of the quality of the 
          environment.
Sec. 106. Small aquatic ecosystem restoration projects.

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 201. Small flood control authority.
Sec. 202. Use of non-Federal funds for compiling and disseminating 
          information on floods and flood damage.
Sec. 203. Contributions by States and political subdivisions.
Sec. 204. Sediment decontamination technology.
Sec. 205. Control of aquatic plants.
Sec. 206. Use of continuing contracts for construction of certain 
          projects.
Sec. 207. Water resources development studies for the Pacific region.
Sec. 208. Everglades and south Florida ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 209. Beneficial uses of dredged material.
Sec. 210. Aquatic ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 211. Watershed management, restoration, and development.
Sec. 212. Flood mitigation and riverine restoration program.
Sec. 213. Shore management program.
Sec. 214. Shore damage prevention or mitigation.
Sec. 215. Shore protection.
Sec. 216. Flood prevention coordination.
Sec. 217. Disposal of dredged material on beaches.
Sec. 218. Annual passes for recreation.
Sec. 219. Nonstructural flood control projects.
Sec. 220. Lakes program.
Sec. 221. Enhancement of fish and wildlife resources.
Sec. 222. Purchase of American-made equipment and products.
Sec. 223. Construction of flood control projects by non-Federal 
          interests.
Sec. 224. Environmental dredging.
Sec. 225. Recreation user fees.
Sec. 226. Small storm damage reduction projects.
Sec. 227. Use of private enterprises.

                  TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

Sec. 301. Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway wildlife mitigation, Alabama and 
          Mississippi.
Sec. 302. Ouzinkie Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 303. St. Paul Harbor, St. Paul, Alaska.
Sec. 304. Loggy Bayou, Red River below Denison Dam, Arkansas, Louisiana, 
          Oklahoma, and Texas.
Sec. 305. Sacramento River, Glenn-Colusa, California.
Sec. 306. San Lorenzo River, California.
Sec. 307. Terminus Dam, Kaweah River, California.
Sec. 308. Delaware River mainstem and channel deepening, Delaware, New 
          Jersey, and Pennsylvania.
Sec. 309. Potomac River, Washington, District of Columbia.
Sec. 310. Brevard County, Florida.
Sec. 311. Broward County and Hillsboro Inlet, Florida.
Sec. 312. Lee County, Captiva Island segment, Florida, periodic beach 
          nourishment.
Sec. 313. Fort Pierce, Florida.
Sec. 314. Nassau County, Florida.
Sec. 315. Miami Harbor channel, Florida.
Sec. 316. St. Augustine, St. Johns County, Florida.
Sec. 317. Milo Creek, Idaho.
Sec. 318. Lake Michigan, Illinois.
Sec. 319. Springfield, Illinois.
Sec. 320. Ogden Dunes, Indiana.
Sec. 321. Saint Joseph River, South Bend, Indiana.
Sec. 322. White River, Indiana.
Sec. 323. Dubuque, Iowa.
Sec. 324. Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana.
Sec. 325. Larose to Golden Meadow, Louisiana.
Sec. 326. Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee, Louisiana.
Sec. 327. Twelve-Mile Bayou, Caddo Parish, Louisiana.
Sec. 328. West bank of the Mississippi River (east of Harvey Canal), 
          Louisiana.
Sec. 329. Tolchester Channel S-Turn, Baltimore, Maryland.
Sec. 330. Sault Sainte Marie, Chippewa County, Michigan.
Sec. 331. Jackson County, Mississippi.
Sec. 332. Bois Brule Drainage and Levee District, Missouri.
Sec. 333. Meramec River Basin, Valley Park Levee, Missouri.
Sec. 334. Missouri River mitigation project, Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, and 
          Nebraska.
Sec. 335. Wood River, Grand Island, Nebraska.
Sec. 336. Absecon Island, New Jersey.
Sec. 337. New York Harbor and Adjacent Channels, Port Jersey, New 
          Jersey.
Sec. 338. Arthur Kill, New York and New Jersey.
Sec. 339. Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay Channels, New York and New 
          Jersey.
Sec. 340. New York City watershed.
Sec. 341. New York State canal system.
Sec. 342. Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, New York.
Sec. 343. Broken Bow Lake, Red River Basin, Oklahoma.
Sec. 344. Willamette River Temperature Control, McKenzie Subbasin, 
          Oregon.
Sec. 345. Curwensville Lake, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 346. Delaware River, Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Sec. 347. Mussers Dam, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 348. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 349. Nine Mile Run, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 350. Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 351. South Central Pennsylvania.
Sec. 352. Fox Point hurricane barrier, Providence, Rhode Island.
Sec. 353. Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, South Carolina.
Sec. 354. Clear Creek, Texas.
Sec. 355. Cypress Creek, Texas.
Sec. 356. Dallas Floodway Extension, Dallas, Texas.
Sec. 357. Upper Jordan River, Utah.
Sec. 358. Elizabeth River, Chesapeake, Virginia.
Sec. 359. Columbia River channel, Washington and Oregon.
Sec. 360. Greenbrier River Basin, West Virginia.
Sec. 361. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, West Virginia.
Sec. 362. Moorefield, West Virginia.
Sec. 363. West Virginia and Pennsylvania flood control.
Sec. 364. Project reauthorizations.
Sec. 365. Project deauthorizations.
Sec. 366. American and Sacramento Rivers, California.
Sec. 367. Martin, Kentucky.
Sec. 368. Southern West Virginia pilot program.
Sec. 369. Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, Jackson, Alabama.
Sec. 370. Tropicana Wash and Flamingo Wash, Nevada.
Sec. 371. Comite River, Louisiana.
Sec. 372. St. Marys River, Michigan.
Sec. 373. Charlevoix, Michigan.
Sec. 374. White River Basin, Arkansas and Missouri.
Sec. 375. Waurika Lake, Oklahoma, water conveyance facilities.

                            TITLE IV--STUDIES

Sec. 401. Deep draft harbor cost sharing.
Sec. 402. Boydsville, Arkansas.
Sec. 403. Greers Ferry Lake, Arkansas.
Sec. 404. Del Norte County, California.
Sec. 405. Frazier Creek, Tulare County, California.
Sec. 406. Mare Island Strait, California.
Sec. 407. Strawberry Creek, Berkeley, California.
Sec. 408. Sweetwater Reservoir, San Diego County, California.
Sec. 409. Whitewater River basin, California.
Sec. 410. Destin-Noriega Point, Florida.
Sec. 411. Little Econlackhatchee River basin, Florida.
Sec. 412. Port Everglades, Broward County, Florida.
Sec. 413. Lake Allatoona, Etowah River, and Little River watershed, 
          Georgia.
Sec. 414. Boise, Idaho.
Sec. 415. Goose Creek watershed, Oakley, Idaho.
Sec. 416. Little Wood River, Gooding, Idaho.
Sec. 417. Snake River, Lewiston, Idaho.
Sec. 418. Snake River and Payette River, Idaho.
Sec. 419. Upper Des Plaines River and tributaries, Illinois and 
          Wisconsin.
Sec. 420. Cameron Parish west of Calcasieu River, Louisiana.
Sec. 421. Coastal Louisiana.
Sec. 422. Grand Isle and vicinity, Louisiana.
Sec. 423. Gulf Intracoastal Waterway ecosystem, Chef Menteur to Sabine 
          River, Louisiana.
Sec. 424. Muddy River, Brookline and Boston, Massachusetts.
Sec. 425. Westport, Massachusetts.
Sec. 426. St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair, Michigan.
Sec. 427. St. Clair Shores, Michigan.
Sec. 428. Woodtick Peninsula, Michigan, and Toledo Harbor, Ohio.
Sec. 429. Pascagoula Harbor, Mississippi.
Sec. 430. Tunica Lake weir, Mississippi.
Sec. 431. Yellowstone River, Montana.
Sec. 432. Las Vegas Valley, Nevada.
Sec. 433. Southwest Valley, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Sec. 434. Cayuga Creek, New York.
Sec. 435. Lake Champlain, New York and Vermont.
Sec. 436. Oswego River basin, New York.
Sec. 437. White Oak River, North Carolina.
Sec. 438. Arcola Creek watershed, Madison, Ohio.
Sec. 439. Cleveland harbor, Cleveland, Ohio.
Sec. 440. Toussaint River, Carroll Township, Ohio.
Sec. 441. Western Lake Erie basin, Ohio, Indiana, and Michigan.
Sec. 442. Schuylkill River, Norristown, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 443. South Carolina coastal areas.
Sec. 444. Santee Delta focus area, South Carolina.
Sec. 445. Waccamaw River, South Carolina.
Sec. 446. Day County, South Dakota.
Sec. 447. Niobrara River and Missouri River, South Dakota.
Sec. 448. Corpus Christi, Texas.
Sec. 449. Mitchell's Cut Channel (Caney Fork Cut), Texas.
Sec. 450. Mouth of Colorado River, Texas.
Sec. 451. Santa Clara River, Utah.
Sec. 452. Mount St. Helens, Washington.
Sec. 453. Kanawha River, Fayette County, West Virginia.
Sec. 454. West Virginia ports.
Sec. 455. John Glenn Great Lakes basin program.
Sec. 456. Great Lakes navigational system.
Sec. 457. Nutrient loading resulting from dredged material disposal.
Sec. 458. Upper Mississippi and Illinois Rivers levees and streambanks 
          protection.
Sec. 459. Upper Mississippi River comprehensive plan.
Sec. 460. Susquehanna River and Upper Chesapeake Bay.

                    TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Sec. 501. Corps assumption of NRCS projects.
Sec. 502. Environmental infrastructure.
Sec. 503. Contaminated sediment dredging technology.
Sec. 504. Dam safety.
Sec. 505. Great Lakes remedial action plans.
Sec. 506. Projects for improvement of the environment.
Sec. 507. Maintenance of navigation channels.
Sec. 508. Measurements of Lake Michigan diversions, Illinois.
Sec. 509. Upper Mississippi River environmental management program.
Sec. 510. Atlantic Coast of New York.
Sec. 511. Water control management.
Sec. 512. Beneficial use of dredged material.
Sec. 513. Design and construction assistance.
Sec. 514. Missouri and Middle Mississippi Rivers enhancement project.
Sec. 515. Irrigation diversion protection and fisheries enhancement 
          assistance.
Sec. 516. Innovative technologies for watershed restoration.
Sec. 517. Expedited consideration of certain projects.
Sec. 518. Dog River, Alabama.
Sec. 519. Levees in Elba and Geneva, Alabama.
Sec. 520. Navajo Reservation, Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah.
Sec. 521. Beaver Lake, Arkansas, water supply storage reallocation.
Sec. 522. Beaver Lake trout production facility, Arkansas.
Sec. 523. Chino dairy preserve, California.
Sec. 524. Orange and San Diego Counties, California.
Sec. 525. Rush Creek, Novato, California.
Sec. 526. Santa Cruz Harbor, California.
Sec. 527. Lower St. Johns River basin, Florida.
Sec. 528. Mayo's Bar Lock and Dam, Coosa River, Rome, Georgia.
Sec. 529. Comprehensive flood impact response modeling system, 
          Coralville Reservoir and Iowa River watershed, Iowa.
Sec. 530. Additional construction assistance in Illinois.
Sec. 531. Kanopolis Lake, Kansas.
Sec. 532. Southern and Eastern Kentucky.
Sec. 533. Southeast Louisiana.
Sec. 534. Snug Harbor, Maryland.
Sec. 535. Welch Point, Elk River, Cecil County, and Chesapeake City, 
          Maryland.
Sec. 536. Cape Cod Canal Railroad Bridge, Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts.
Sec. 537. St. Louis, Missouri.
Sec. 538. Beaver Branch of Big Timber Creek, New Jersey.
Sec. 539. Lake Ontario and St. Lawrence River water levels, New York.
Sec. 540. New York-New Jersey Harbor, New York and New Jersey.
Sec. 541. Sea Gate Reach, Coney Island, New York, New York.
Sec. 542. Woodlawn, New York.
Sec. 543. Floodplain mapping, New York.
Sec. 544. Toussaint River, Carroll Township, Ottawa County, Ohio.
Sec. 545. Sardis Reservoir, Oklahoma.
Sec. 546. Skinner Butte Park, Eugene, Oregon.
Sec. 547. Willamette River basin, Oregon.
Sec. 548. Bradford and Sullivan Counties, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 549. Erie Harbor, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 550. Point Marion Lock and Dam, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 551. Seven Points' Harbor, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 552. Southeastern Pennsylvania.
Sec. 553. Upper Susquehanna-Lackawanna, Pennsylvania, watershed 
          management and restoration study.
Sec. 554. Aguadilla Harbor, Puerto Rico.
Sec. 555. Oahe Dam to Lake Sharpe, South Dakota, study.
Sec. 556. North Padre Island storm damage reduction and environmental 
          restoration project.
Sec. 557. Northern West Virginia.
Sec. 558. Mississippi River Commission.
Sec. 559. Coastal aquatic habitat management.
Sec. 560. Abandoned and inactive noncoal mine restoration.
Sec. 561. Beneficial use of waste tire rubber.
Sec. 562. Site designation.
Sec. 563. Land conveyances.
Sec. 564. McNary Pool, Washington.
Sec. 565. Namings.
Sec. 566. Folsom Dam and Reservoir additional storage and additional 
          flood control studies.
Sec. 567. Wallops Island, Virginia.
Sec. 568. Detroit River, Michigan.
Sec. 569. Northeastern Minnesota.
Sec. 570. Alaska.
Sec. 571. Central West Virginia.
Sec. 572. Sacramento Metropolitan Area watershed restoration, 
          California.
Sec. 573. Onondaga Lake, New York.
Sec. 574. East Lynn Lake, West Virginia.
Sec. 575. Eel River, California.
Sec. 576. North Little Rock, Arkansas.
Sec. 577. Upper Mississippi River, Mississippi Place, St. Paul, 
          Minnesota.
Sec. 578. Dredging of salt ponds in the State of Rhode Island.
Sec. 579. Upper Susquehanna River basin, Pennsylvania and New York.
Sec. 580. Cumberland, Maryland, flood project mitigation.
Sec. 581. City of Miami Beach, Florida.
Sec. 582. Research and development program for Columbia and Snake Rivers 
          salmon survival.
Sec. 583. Larkspur Ferry Channel, California.
Sec. 584. Holes Creek flood control project, Ohio.
Sec. 585. San Jacinto disposal area, Galveston, Texas.
Sec. 586. Water monitoring station.
Sec. 587. Overflow management facility, Rhode Island.
Sec. 588. Lower Chena River, Alaska.
Sec. 589. Numana Dam Fish passage, Nevada.
Sec. 590. Embrey Dam, Virginia.
Sec. 591. Environmental remediation, Front Royal, Virginia.
Sec. 592. Mississippi.
Sec. 593. Central New Mexico.
Sec. 594. Ohio.
Sec. 595. Rural Nevada and Montana.
Sec. 596. Phoenix, Arizona.
Sec. 597. National Harbor, Maryland.

TITLE VI--CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, LOWER BRULE SIOUX TRIBE, AND STATE 
        OF SOUTH DAKOTA TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION

Sec. 601. Definitions.
Sec. 602. Terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration.
Sec. 603. South Dakota Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust 
          Fund.
Sec. 604. Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and Lower Brule Sioux Tribe 
          Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust Funds.
Sec. 605. Transfer of Federal land to State of South Dakota.
Sec. 606. Transfer of Corps of Engineers land for Indian tribes.
Sec. 607. Administration.
Sec. 608. Study.
Sec. 609. Authorization of appropriations.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SECRETARY.

    In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the 
Army.

                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

SEC. 101. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) Projects With Chief's Reports.--The following projects for 
water resources development and conservation and other purposes are 
authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in 
accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, described in 
the respective reports designated in this subsection:
        (1) Nome harbor improvements, alaska.--The project for 
    navigation, Nome Harbor improvements, Alaska: Report of the Chief 
    of Engineers dated June 8, 1999, as amended by the Chief of 
    Engineers on August 2, 1999, at a total cost of $25,651,000, with 
    an estimated Federal cost of $20,192,000 and an estimated non-
    Federal cost of $5,459,000.
        (2) Sand point harbor, alaska.--The project for navigation, 
    Sand Point Harbor, Alaska: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
    October 13, 1998, at a total cost of $11,760,000, with an estimated 
    Federal cost of $6,964,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
    $4,796,000.
        (3) Seward harbor, alaska.--The project for navigation, Seward 
    Harbor, Alaska: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated June 8, 
    1999, at a total cost of $12,240,000, with an estimated Federal 
    cost of $4,089,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $8,151,000.
        (4) Rio salado (salt river), phoenix and tempe, arizona.--The 
    project for flood control and environmental restoration, Rio Salado 
    (Salt River), Phoenix and Tempe, Arizona: Report of the Chief of 
    Engineers dated August 20, 1998, at a total cost of $88,048,000, 
    with an estimated Federal cost of $56,355,000 and an estimated non-
    Federal cost of $31,693,000.
        (5) Tucson drainage area, arizona.--The project for flood 
    damage reduction, environmental restoration, and recreation, Tucson 
    drainage area, Arizona: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated May 
    20, 1998, at a total cost of $29,900,000, with an estimated Federal 
    cost of $16,768,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
    $13,132,000.
        (6) American and sacramento rivers, california.--
            (A) In general.--The Folsom Dam Modification portion of the 
        Folsom Modification Plan described in the United States Army 
        Corps of Engineers Supplemental Information Report for the 
        American River Watershed Project, California, dated March 1996, 
        as modified by the report entitled ``Folsom Dam Modification 
        Report, New Outlets Plan'', dated March 1998, prepared by the 
        Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, at an estimated cost of 
        $150,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $97,500,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $52,500,000. The Secretary 
        shall coordinate with the Secretary of the Interior with 
        respect to the design and construction of modifications at 
        Folsom Dam authorized by this paragraph.
            (B) Reoperation measures.--Upon completion of the 
        improvements to Folsom Dam authorized by subparagraph (A), the 
        variable space allocated to flood control within the Reservoir 
        shall be reduced from the current operating range of 400,000-
        670,000 acre-feet to 400,000-600,000 acre-feet.
            (C) Makeup of water shortages caused by flood control 
        operation.--The Secretary of the Interior shall enter into, or 
        modify, such agreements with the Sacramento Area Flood Control 
        Agency regarding the operation of Folsom Dam and reservoir as 
        may be necessary in order that, notwithstanding any prior 
        agreement or provision of law, 100 percent of the water needed 
        to make up for any water shortage caused by variable flood 
        control operation during any year at Folsom Dam and resulting 
        in a significant impact on recreation at Folsom Reservoir shall 
        be replaced, to the extent the water is available for purchase, 
        by the Secretary of the Interior.
            (D) Significant impact on recreation.--For the purposes of 
        this paragraph, a significant impact on recreation is defined 
        as any impact that results in a lake elevation at Folsom 
        Reservoir below 435 feet above sea level starting on May 15 and 
        ending on September 15 of any given year.
            (E) Updated flood management plan.--The Secretary, in 
        cooperation with the Secretary of the Interior, shall update 
        the flood management plan for Folsom Dam authorized by section 
        9159(f)(2) of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 
        1993 (106 Stat. 1946), to reflect the operational capabilities 
        created by the modification authorized by subparagraph (A) and 
        improved weather forecasts based on the Advanced Hydrologic 
        Prediction System of the National Weather Service.
        (7) Oakland harbor, california.--The project for navigation, 
    Oakland Harbor, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
    April 21, 1999, at a total cost of $252,290,000, with an estimated 
    Federal cost of $128,081,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
    $124,209,000.
        (8) South sacramento county streams, california.--The project 
    for flood control, environmental restoration and recreation, South 
    Sacramento County streams, California: Report of the Chief of 
    Engineers dated October 6, 1998, at a total cost of $65,500,000, 
    with an estimated Federal cost of $41,200,000 and an estimated non-
    Federal cost of $24,300,000.
        (9) Upper guadalupe river, california.--Construction of the 
    locally preferred plan for flood damage reduction and recreation, 
    Upper Guadalupe River, California, described as the Bypass Channel 
    Plan of the Chief of Engineers dated August 19, 1998, at a total 
    cost of $140,328,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $44,000,000 
    and an estimated non-Federal cost of $96,328,000.
        (10) Yuba river basin, california.--The project for flood 
    damage reduction, Yuba River Basin, California: Report of the Chief 
    of Engineers dated November 25, 1998, at a total cost of 
    $26,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $17,350,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $9,250,000.
        (11) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new jersey-broadkill 
    beach, delaware.--The project for hurricane and storm damage 
    reduction, Delaware Bay coastline, Delaware and New Jersey-
    Broadkill Beach, Delaware: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
    August 17, 1998, at a total cost of $9,049,000, with an estimated 
    Federal cost of $5,674,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
    $3,375,000, and at an estimated average annual cost of $538,200 for 
    periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an 
    estimated annual Federal cost of $349,800 and an estimated annual 
    non-Federal cost of $188,400.
        (12) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new jersey-port 
    mahon, delaware.--The project for ecosystem restoration, Delaware 
    Bay coastline, Delaware and New Jersey-Port Mahon, Delaware: Report 
    of the Chief of Engineers dated September 28, 1998, at a total cost 
    of $7,644,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $4,969,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $2,675,000, and at an estimated 
    average annual cost of $234,000 for periodic nourishment over the 
    50-year life of the project, with an estimated annual Federal cost 
    of $152,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal cost of $82,000.
        (13) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new jersey-roosevelt 
    inlet-lewes beach, delaware.--The project for navigation mitigation 
    and hurricane and storm damage reduction, Delaware Bay coastline, 
    Delaware and New Jersey-Roosevelt Inlet-Lewes Beach, Delaware: 
    Report of the Chief of Engineers dated February 3, 1999, at a total 
    cost of $3,393,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $2,620,000 
    and an estimated non-Federal cost of $773,000, and at an estimated 
    average annual cost of $196,000 for periodic nourishment over the 
    50-year life of the project, with an estimated annual Federal cost 
    of $152,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal cost of $44,000.
        (14) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new jersey-villas and 
    vicinity, new jersey.--The project for shore protection and 
    ecosystem restoration, Delaware Bay coastline, Delaware and New 
    Jersey-Villas and vicinity, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of 
    Engineers dated April 21, 1999, at a total cost of $7,520,000, with 
    an estimated Federal cost of $4,888,000 and an estimated non-
    Federal cost of $2,632,000.
        (15) Delaware coast from cape henelopen to fenwick island, 
    bethany beach/south bethany beach, delaware.--The project for 
    hurricane and storm damage reduction, Delaware Coast from Cape 
    Henelopen to Fenwick Island, Bethany Beach/South Bethany Beach, 
    Delaware: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated April 21, 1999, at 
    a total cost of $22,205,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
    $14,433,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $7,772,000, and at 
    an estimated average annual cost of $1,584,000 for periodic 
    nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an estimated 
    annual Federal cost of $1,030,000 and an estimated annual non-
    Federal cost of $554,000.
        (16) Hillsboro and okeechobee aquifer, florida.--The project 
    for aquifer storage and recovery described in the Corps of 
    Engineers Central and Southern Florida Water Supply Study, Florida, 
    dated April 1989, and in House Document 369, dated July 30, 1968, 
    at a total cost of $27,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
    $13,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $13,500,000.
        (17) Jacksonville harbor, florida.--The project for navigation, 
    Jacksonville Harbor, Florida: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
    dated April 21, 1999, at a total cost of $26,116,000, with an 
    estimated Federal cost of $9,129,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
    cost of $16,987,000.
        (18) Tampa harbor-big bend channel, florida.--The project for 
    navigation, Tampa Harbor-Big Bend Channel, Florida: Report of the 
    Chief of Engineers dated October 13, 1998, at a total cost of 
    $12,356,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $6,235,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $6,121,000.
        (19) Brunswick harbor, georgia.--The project for navigation, 
    Brunswick Harbor, Georgia: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
    October 6, 1998, at a total cost of $50,717,000, with an estimated 
    Federal cost of $32,966,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
    $17,751,000.
        (20) Beargrass creek, kentucky.--The project for flood control, 
    Beargrass Creek, Kentucky: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
    May 12, 1998, at a total cost of $11,171,300, with an estimated 
    Federal cost of $7,261,500 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
    $3,909,800.
        (21) Amite river and tributaries, louisiana, east baton rouge 
    parish watershed.--The project for flood damage reduction and 
    recreation, Amite River and Tributaries, Louisiana, East Baton 
    Rouge Parish Watershed: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
    December 23, 1996, at a total cost of $112,900,000, with an 
    estimated Federal cost of $73,400,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
    cost of $39,500,000.
        (22) Baltimore harbor anchorages and channels, maryland and 
    virginia.--
            (A) In general.--The project for navigation, Baltimore 
        Harbor Anchorages and Channels, Maryland and Virginia, Report 
        of the Chief of Engineers dated June 8, 1998, at a total cost 
        of $28,426,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $18,994,000 
        and an estimated non-Federal cost of $9,432,000.
            (B) Credit or reimbursement.--If a project cooperation 
        agreement is entered into, the non-Federal interest shall 
        receive credit toward, or reimbursement of, the Federal share 
        of project costs for construction work performed by the non-
        Federal interest before execution of the project cooperation 
        agreement if the Secretary finds the work to be integral to the 
        project.
            (C) Study of modifications.--During the preconstruction 
        engineering and design phase of the project, the Secretary 
        shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
        undertaking further modifications to the Dundalk Marine 
        Terminal access channels, consisting of--
                (i) deepening and widening the Dundalk access channels 
            to a depth of 50 feet and a width of 500 feet;
                (ii) widening the flares of the access channels; and
                (iii) providing a new flare on the west side of the 
            entrance to the east access channel.
            (D) Report.--
                (i) In general.--Not later than March 1, 2000, the 
            Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the study 
            under subparagraph (C).
                (ii) Contents.--The report shall include a 
            determination of--

                    (I) the feasibility of performing the project 
                modifications described in subparagraph (C); and
                    (II) the appropriateness of crediting or 
                reimbursing the Federal share of the cost of the work 
                performed by the non-Federal interest on the project 
                modifications.

        (23) Red lake river at crookston, minnesota.--The project for 
    flood control, Red Lake River at Crookston, Minnesota: Report of 
    the Chief of Engineers dated April 20, 1998, at a total cost of 
    $8,950,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $5,720,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $3,230,000.
        (24) Turkey creek basin, kansas city, missouri, and kansas 
    city, kansas.--The project for flood damage reduction, Turkey Creek 
    Basin, Kansas City, Missouri, and Kansas City, Kansas: Report of 
    the Chief of Engineers dated April 21, 1999, at a total cost of 
    $42,875,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $25,596,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $17,279,000.
        (25) Lower cape may meadows, cape may point, new jersey.--The 
    project for navigation mitigation, ecosystem restoration, shore 
    protection, and hurricane and storm damage reduction, Lower Cape 
    May Meadows, Cape May Point, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of 
    Engineers dated April 5, 1999, at a total cost of $15,952,000, with 
    an estimated Federal cost of $12,118,000 and an estimated non-
    Federal cost of $3,834,000, and at an estimated average annual cost 
    of $1,114,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the 
    project, with an estimated annual Federal cost of $897,000 and an 
    estimated annual non-Federal cost of $217,000.
        (26) Townsends inlet to cape may inlet, new jersey.--The 
    project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, shore protection, 
    and ecosystem restoration, Townsends Inlet to Cape May Inlet, New 
    Jersey: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated September 28, 1998, 
    at a total cost of $56,503,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
    $36,727,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $19,776,000, and 
    at an estimated average annual cost of $2,000,000 for periodic 
    nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an estimated 
    annual Federal cost of $1,300,000 and an estimated annual non-
    Federal cost of $700,000.
        (27) Guanajibo river, puerto rico.--
            (A) In general.--The project for flood control, Guanajibo 
        River, Puerto Rico: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated 
        February 27, 1996, at a total cost of $27,031,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $20,273,250 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $6,757,750.
            (B) Cost sharing.--Cost sharing for the project shall be 
        determined in accordance with section 103(a) of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(a)), as in 
        effect on October 11, 1996.
        (28) Rio grande de manati, barceloneta, puerto rico.--The 
    project for flood control, Rio Grande De Manati, Barceloneta, 
    Puerto Rico: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated January 22, 
    1999, at a total cost of $13,491,000, with an estimated Federal 
    cost of $8,785,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $4,706,000.
        (29) Rio nigua, salinas, puerto rico.--The project for flood 
    control, Rio Nigua, Salinas, Puerto Rico: Report of the Chief of 
    Engineers dated April 15, 1997, at a total cost of $13,702,000, 
    with an estimated Federal cost of $7,645,000 and an estimated non-
    Federal cost of $6,057,000.
        (30) Salt creek, graham, texas.--The project for flood control, 
    environmental restoration, and recreation, Salt Creek, Graham, 
    Texas: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated October 6, 1998, at a 
    total cost of $10,080,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
    $6,560,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,520,000.
    (b) Projects Subject to a Final Report.--The following projects for 
water resources development and conservation and other purposes are 
authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in 
accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, recommended 
in a final report of the Chief of Engineers if a favorable report of 
the Chief is completed not later than December 31, 1999:
        (1) Heritage harbor, wrangell, alaska.--The project for 
    navigation, Heritage Harbor, Wrangell, Alaska, at a total cost of 
    $24,556,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $14,447,000 and 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $10,109,000.
        (2) Arroyo pasajero, california.--The project for flood damage 
    reduction, Arroyo Pasajero, California, at a total cost of 
    $260,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $170,100,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $90,600,000.
        (3) Hamilton airfield, california.--The project for 
    environmental restoration, Hamilton Airfield, California, at a 
    total cost of $55,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
    $41,400,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $13,800,000.
        (4) Success dam, tule river basin, california.--The project for 
    flood damage reduction and water supply, Success Dam, Tule River 
    basin, California, at a total cost of $17,900,000, with an 
    estimated Federal cost of $11,635,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
    cost of $6,265,000.
        (5) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new jersey: oakwood 
    beach, new jersey.--The project for shore protection, Delaware Bay 
    coastline, Delaware and New Jersey: Oakwood Beach, New Jersey, at a 
    total cost of $3,360,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
    $2,184,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $1,176,000, and at 
    an estimated average annual cost of $81,000 for periodic 
    nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an estimated 
    annual Federal cost of $53,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal 
    cost of $28,000.
        (6) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new jersey: reeds 
    beach and pierces point, new jersey.--The project for shore 
    protection and ecosystem restoration, Delaware Bay coastline, 
    Delaware and New Jersey: Reeds Beach and Pierces Point, New Jersey, 
    at a total cost of $4,057,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
    $2,637,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $1,420,000.
        (7) Little talbot island, duval county, florida.--The project 
    for hurricane and storm damage prevention and shore protection, 
    Little Talbot Island, Duval County, Florida, at a total cost of 
    $5,915,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $3,839,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $2,076,000.
        (8) Ponce de leon inlet, florida.--The project for navigation 
    and related purposes, Ponce de Leon Inlet, Volusia County, Florida, 
    at a total cost of $5,454,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
    $2,988,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $2,466,000.
        (9) Savannah harbor expansion, georgia.--
            (A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B), the project 
        for navigation, Savannah Harbor expansion, Georgia, including 
        implementation of the mitigation plan, with such modifications 
        as the Secretary considers appropriate, at a total cost of 
        $230,174,000 (of which amount a portion is authorized for 
        implementation of the mitigation plan), with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $145,160,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $85,014,000.
            (B) Conditions.--The project authorized by subparagraph (A) 
        may be carried out only after--
                (i) the Secretary, in consultation with affected 
            Federal, State of Georgia, State of South Carolina, 
            regional, and local entities, reviews and approves an 
            environmental impact statement for the project that 
            includes--

                    (I) an analysis of the impacts of project depth 
                alternatives ranging from 42 feet through 48 feet; and
                    (II) a selected plan for navigation and an 
                associated mitigation plan as required under section 
                906(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
                (33 U.S.C. 2283(a)); and

                (ii) the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of 
            Commerce, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
            Agency, and the Secretary approve the selected plan and 
            determine that the associated mitigation plan adequately 
            addresses the potential environmental impacts of the 
            project.
            (C) Mitigation requirements.--The mitigation plan shall be 
        implemented before or concurrently with construction of the 
        project.
        (10) Des plaines river, illinois.--The project for flood 
    control, Des Plaines River, Illinois, at a total cost of 
    $48,800,000 with an estimated Federal cost of $31,700,000 and an 
    estimated non-Federal cost of $17,100,000.
        (11) Reelfoot lake, kentucky and tennessee.--The project for 
    ecosystem restoration, Reelfoot Lake, Kentucky and Tennessee, at a 
    total cost of $35,287,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
    $23,601,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $11,686,000.
        (12) Brigantine inlet to great egg harbor, brigantine island, 
    new jersey.--The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction 
    and shore protection, Brigantine Inlet to Great Egg Harbor, 
    Brigantine Island, New Jersey, at a total cost of $4,970,000, with 
    an estimated Federal cost of $3,230,000 and an estimated non-
    Federal cost of $1,740,000, and at an estimated average annual cost 
    of $465,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the 
    project, with an estimated annual Federal cost of $302,000 and an 
    estimated annual non-Federal cost of $163,000.
        (13) Columbia river channel, oregon and washington.--The 
    project for navigation, Columbia River Channel, Oregon and 
    Washington, at a total cost of $183,623,000, with an estimated 
    Federal cost of $106,132,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
    $77,491,000.
        (14) Johnson creek, arlington, texas.--The project for flood 
    damage reduction, environmental restoration, and recreation, 
    Johnson Creek, Arlington, Texas, at a total cost of $20,300,000, 
    with an estimated Federal cost of $12,000,000 and an estimated non-
    Federal cost of $8,300,000.
        (15) Howard hanson dam, washington.--The project for water 
    supply and ecosystem restoration, Howard Hanson Dam, Washington, at 
    a total cost of $75,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
    $36,900,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $38,700,000.

SEC. 102. SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of 
the following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project 
is feasible, may carry out the project under section 205 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
        (1) Eyak river, cordova, alaska.--Project for flood damage 
    reduction, Eyak River, Cordova, Alaska.
        (2) Salcha river and piledriver slough, fairbanks, alaska.--
    Project for flood damage reduction to protect against surface water 
    flooding, lower Salcha River and Piledriver Slough from its 
    headwaters at the mouth of the Salcha River to the Chena Lakes 
    Flood Control Project, Fairbanks, Alaska.
        (3) Lancaster, california.--Project for flood control, 
    Lancaster, California, westside stormwater retention facility.
        (4) Magpie creek, california.--Project for flood control, 
    Magpie Creek, California, located within the boundaries of 
    McClellan Air Force Base.
        (5) Gateway triangle area, florida.--Project for flood control, 
    Gateway Triangle area, Collier County, Florida.
        (6) Plant city, florida.--Project for flood control, Plant 
    City, Florida.
        (7) Stone island, lake monroe, florida.--Project for flood 
    control, Stone Island, Lake Monroe, Florida.
        (8) Ohio river, illinois.--Project for flood control, Ohio 
    River, Illinois.
        (9) Hamilton dam, michigan.--Project for flood control, 
    Hamilton Dam, Michigan.
        (10) Repaupo creek and delaware river, gloucester county, new 
    jersey.--Project for tidegate and levee improvements for Repaupo 
    Creek and the Delaware River, Gloucester County, New Jersey.
        (11) Irondequoit creek, new york.--Project for flood control, 
    Irondequoit Creek watershed, New York.
        (12) Owasco lake seawall, new york.--Project for flood control, 
    Owasco Lake seawall, New York.
        (13) Port clinton, ohio.--Project for flood control, Port 
    Clinton, Ohio.
        (14) Abington township, pennsylvania.--Project for flood 
    control, Baeder and Wanamaker Roads, Abington Township, 
    Pennsylvania.
        (15) Port indian, west norriton township, montgomery county, 
    pennsylvania.--Project for flood control, Port Indian, West 
    Norriton Township, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania.
        (16) Port providence, upper providence township, 
    pennsylvania.--Project for flood control, Port Providence, Upper 
    Providence Township, Pennsylvania.
        (17) Springfield township, montgomery county, pennsylvania.--
    Project for flood control, Springfield Township, Montgomery County, 
    Pennsylvania.
        (18) Tawney run creek, pennsylvania.--Project for flood 
    control, Tawney Run Creek, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
        (19) Wissahickon watershed, pennsylvania.--Project for flood 
    control, Wissahickon watershed, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
        (20) Tioga county, pennsylvania.--Project for flood control, 
    Tioga River and Cowanesque River and their tributaries, Tioga 
    County, Pennsylvania.
        (21) First creek, knoxville, tennessee.--Project for flood 
    control, First Creek, Knoxville, Tennessee.
        (22) Metro center levee, cumberland river, nashville, 
    tennessee.--Project for flood control, Metro Center Levee, 
    Cumberland River, Nashville, Tennessee.
    (b) Festus and Crystal City, Missouri.--
        (1) Maximum federal expenditure.--The maximum amount of Federal 
    funds that may be expended for the project for flood control, 
    Festus and Crystal City, Missouri, is $10,000,000.
        (2) Revision of project cooperation agreement.--The Secretary 
    shall revise the project cooperation agreement for the project 
    described in paragraph (1) to take into account the change in the 
    Federal participation in the project under paragraph (1).

SEC. 103. SMALL BANK STABILIZATION PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of 
the following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project 
is feasible, may carry out the project under section 14 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r):
        (1) Arctic ocean, barrow, alaska.--Project for storm damage 
    reduction and coastal erosion, Barrow, Alaska.
        (2) Saint joseph river, indiana.--Project for streambank 
    erosion control, Saint Joseph River, Indiana.
        (3) Saginaw river, bay city, michigan.--Project for streambank 
    erosion control, Saginaw River, Bay City, Michigan.
        (4) Big timber creek, new jersey.--Project for streambank 
    erosion control, Big Timber Creek, New Jersey.
        (5) Lake shore road, athol springs, new york.--Project for 
    streambank erosion control, Lake Shore Road, Athol Springs, New 
    York.
        (6) Marist college, poughkeepsie, new york.--Project for 
    streambank erosion control, Marist College, Poughkeepsie, New York.
        (7) Monroe county, ohio.--Project for streambank erosion 
    control, Monroe County, Ohio.
        (8) Green valley, west virginia.--Project for streambank 
    erosion control, Green Valley, West Virginia.
    (b) Yellowstone River, Billings, Montana.--The streambank 
protection project at Coulson Park, along the Yellowstone River, 
Billings, Montana, shall be eligible for assistance under section 14 of 
the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r).

SEC. 104. SMALL NAVIGATION PROJECTS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is feasible, 
may carry out the project under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577).
        (1) Grand marais, arkansas.--Project for navigation, Grand 
    Marais, Arkansas.
        (2) Fields landing channel, humboldt harbor, california.--
    Project for navigation, Fields Landing Channel, Humboldt Harbor, 
    California.
        (3) San mateo (pillar point harbor), california.--Project for 
    navigation, San Mateo (Pillar Point Harbor), California.
        (4) Agana marina, guam.--Project for navigation, Agana Marina, 
    Guam.
        (5) Agat marina, guam.--Project for navigation, Agat Marina, 
    Guam.
        (6) Apra harbor fuel piers, guam.--Project for navigation, Apra 
    Harbor Fuel Piers, Guam.
        (7) Apra harbor pier f-6, guam.--Project for navigation, Apra 
    Harbor Pier F-6, Guam.
        (8) Apra harbor seawall, guam.--Project for navigation 
    including a seawall, Apra Harbor, Guam.
        (9) Guam harbor, guam.--Project for navigation, Guam Harbor, 
    Guam.
        (10) Illinois river near chautauqua park, illinois.--Project 
    for navigation, Illinois River near Chautauqua Park, Illinois.
        (11) Whiting shoreline waterfront, whiting, indiana.--Project 
    for navigation, Whiting shoreline waterfront, Whiting, Indiana.
        (12) Union river, ellsworth, maine.--Project for navigation, 
    Union River, Ellsworth, Maine.
        (13) Naraguagus river, machias, maine.--Project for navigation, 
    Naraguagus River, Machias, Maine.
        (14) Detroit river, michigan.--Project for navigation, Detroit 
    River, Michigan, including dredging and removal of a reef.
        (15) Fortescue inlet, delaware bay, new jersey.--Project for 
    navigation, Fortescue Inlet, Delaware Bay, New Jersey.
        (16) Braddock bay, greece, new york.--Project for navigation, 
    Braddock Bay, Greece, New York.
        (17) Buffalo and lasalle park, new york.--Project for 
    navigation, Buffalo and LaSalle Park, New York.
        (18) Sturgeon point, new york.--Project for navigation, 
    Sturgeon Point, New York.
        (19) Fairport harbor, ohio.--Project for navigation, Fairport 
    Harbor, Ohio, including a recreation channel.
    SEC. 105. SMALL PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE QUALITY OF THE 
      ENVIRONMENT.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of 
the following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project 
is appropriate, may carry out the project under section 1135(a) of the 
Water Reseources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a(a):
        (1) Illinois river in the vicinity of havana, illinois.--
    Project for improvement of the quality of the environment, Illinois 
    River in the vicinity of Havana, Illinois.
        (2) Knitting mill creek, virginia.--Project for improvement of 
    the quality of the environment, Knitting Mill Creek, Virginia.
    (b) Pine Flat Dam, Kings River, California.--Under authority of 
section 1135(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2309a(a)), the Secretary shall carry out a project to construct 
a turbine bypass at Pine Flat Dam, Kings River, California, in 
accordance with the project modification report and environmental 
assessment dated September 1996.

SEC. 106. SMALL AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROJECTS.

    The Secretary is authorized to carry out the following projects 
under section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2330):
        (1) Contra costa county, bay delta, california.--Project for 
    aquatic ecosystem restoration, Contra Costa County, Bay Delta, 
    California.
        (2) Indian river, florida.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
    restoration and lagoon restoration, Indian River, Florida.
        (3) Little wekiva river, florida.--Project for aquatic 
    ecosystem restoration and erosion control, Little Wekiva River, 
    Florida.
        (4) Cook county, illinois.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
    restoration and lagoon restoration and protection, Cook County, 
    Illinois.
        (5) Grand batture island, mississippi.--Project for aquatic 
    ecosystem restoration, Grand Batture Island, Mississippi.
        (6) Hancock, harrison, and jackson counties, mississippi.--
    Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration and reef restoration 
    along the Gulf Coast, Hancock, Harrison, and Jackson Counties, 
    Mississippi.
        (7) Mississippi river and river des peres, st. louis, 
    missouri.--Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration and 
    recreation, Mississippi River and River Des Peres, St. Louis, 
    Missouri.
        (8) Hudson river, new york.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
    restoration, Hudson River, New York.
        (9) Oneida lake, new york.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
    restoration, Oneida Lake, Oneida County, New York.
        (10) Otsego lake, new york.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
    restoration, Otsego Lake, Otsego County, New York.
        (11) North fork of yellow creek, ohio.--Project for aquatic 
    ecosystem restoration, North Fork of Yellow Creek, Ohio.
        (12) Wheeling creek watershed, ohio.--Project for aquatic 
    ecosystem restoration, Wheeling Creek watershed, Ohio.
        (13) Springfield millrace, oregon.--Project for aquatic 
    ecosystem restoration, Springfield Millrace, Oregon.
        (14) Upper amazon creek, oregon.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
    restoration, Upper Amazon Creek, Oregon.
        (15) Lake ontelaunee reservoir, berks county, pennsylvania.--
    Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration and distilling pond 
    facilities, Lake Ontelaunee Reservoir, Berks County, Pennsylvania.
        (16) Blackstone river basin, rhode island and massachusetts.--
    Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration and fish passage 
    facilities, Blackstone River Basin, Rhode Island and Massachusetts.

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

SEC. 201. SMALL FLOOD CONTROL AUTHORITY.

    Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) is 
amended--
        (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``construction of small 
    projects'' and inserting ``implementation of small structural and 
    nonstructural projects''; and
        (2) in the third sentence, by striking ``$5,000,000'' and 
    inserting ``$7,000,000''.
    SEC. 202. USE OF NON-FEDERAL FUNDS FOR COMPILING AND DISSEMINATING 
      INFORMATION ON FLOODS AND FLOOD DAMAGE.
    Section 206(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 709a(b)) 
is amended in the third sentence by inserting before the period at the 
end the following: ``, but the Secretary of the Army may accept funds 
voluntarily contributed by such entities for the purpose of expanding 
the scope of the services requested by the entities''.

SEC. 203. CONTRIBUTIONS BY STATES AND POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS.

    Section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (33 U.S.C. 701h), is amended 
by inserting ``or environmental restoration'' after ``flood control''.

SEC. 204. SEDIMENT DECONTAMINATION TECHNOLOGY.

    Section 405 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 
U.S.C. 2239 note; Public Law 102-580) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following:
        ``(4) Practical end-use products.--Technologies selected for 
    demonstration at the pilot scale shall be intended to result in 
    practical end-use products.
        ``(5) Assistance by the secretary.--The Secretary shall assist 
    the project to ensure expeditious completion by providing 
    sufficient quantities of contaminated dredged material to conduct 
    the full-scale demonstrations to stated capacity.'';
        (2) in subsection (c), by striking the first sentence and 
    inserting the following: ``There is authorized to be appropriated 
    to carry out this section $22,000,000 to complete technology 
    testing, technology commercialization, and the development of full 
    scale processing facilities within the New York/New Jersey 
    Harbor.''; and
        (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) Support.--In carrying out the program under this section, the 
Secretary is encouraged to use contracts, cooperative agreements, and 
grants with colleges and universities and other non-Federal 
entities.''.

SEC. 205. CONTROL OF AQUATIC PLANTS.

    Section 104 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 610) is 
amended--
        (1) in the first sentence of subsection (a), by striking 
    ``water-hyacinth, alligatorweed, Eurasian water milfoil, melaleuca, 
    and other obnoxious aquatic plant growths, from'' and inserting 
    ``noxious aquatic plant growths from'';
        (2) in the first sentence of subsection (b), by striking 
    ``$12,000,000'' and inserting ``$15,000,000''; and
        (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Support.--In carrying out the program under this section, the 
Secretary is encouraged to use contracts, cooperative agreements, and 
grants with colleges and universities and other non-Federal 
entities.''.
    SEC. 206. USE OF CONTINUING CONTRACTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN 
      PROJECTS.
    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Secretary shall not implement a fully allocated funding policy with 
respect to a water resource project if initiation of construction has 
occurred but sufficient funds are not available to complete the 
project.
    (b) Continuing Contracts.--The Secretary shall enter into a 
continuing contract for a project described in subsection (a).
    (c) Initiation of Construction Clarified.--For the purposes of this 
section, initiation of construction for a project occurs on the date of 
enactment of an Act that appropriates funds for the project from 1 of 
the following appropriation accounts:
        (1) Construction, General.
        (2) Operation and Maintenance, General.
        (3) Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries.
    SEC. 207. WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT STUDIES FOR THE PACIFIC 
      REGION.
    Section 444 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3747) is amended by striking ``interest of navigation'' and 
inserting ``interests of water resources development including 
navigation, flood damage reduction, and environmental restoration''.
    SEC. 208. EVERGLADES AND SOUTH FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.
    (a) Extension of Program.--Section 528(b)(3) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 is amended--
        (1) in subparagraph (B) (110 Stat. 3769), by striking ``1999'' 
    and inserting ``2003''; and
        (2) in subparagraph (C)(i) (110 Stat. 3769), by striking 
    ``1999'' and inserting ``2003''.
    (b) Credit and Reimbursement of Past and Future Activities.--
Section 528(b)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3768) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(D) Credit and reimbursement of past and future 
        activities.--The Secretary may provide credit to or reimburse 
        the non-Federal project sponsor (using funds authorized by 
        subparagraph (C)) for the reasonable costs of any work that has 
        been performed or will be performed in connection with a study 
        or activity meeting the requirements of subparagraph (A) if--
                ``(i) the Secretary determines that--

                    ``(I) the work performed by the non-Federal project 
                sponsor will substantially expedite completion of a 
                critical restoration project; and
                    ``(II) the work is necessary for a critical 
                restoration project; and

                ``(ii) the credit or reimbursement is granted pursuant 
            to a project-specific agreement that prescribes the terms 
            and conditions of the credit or reimbursement.''.
    (c) Caloosahatchee River Basin, Florida.--Section 528(e)(4) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3770) is amended in 
the first sentence by inserting before the period at the end the 
following: ``if the Secretary determines that the acquisition is 
compatible with and an integral component of the Everglades and South 
Florida ecosystem restoration, including potential acquisition of land 
or interests in land in the Caloosahatchee River basin or other 
areas''.
    (d) In-Kind Work.--Section 528(e)(4) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3770) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``Regardless'' and inserting the following:
        ``(1) Land acquisition.--Regardless''; and
        (2) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(2) In-kind work.--
            ``(A) In general.--During the preconstruction, engineering, 
        and design phase and the construction phase of the Central and 
        Southern Florida Project, the Secretary shall allow credit 
        against the non-Federal share of the cost of activities 
        described in subsection (b) for work performed by non-Federal 
        interests at the request of the Secretary in furtherance of the 
        design of features included in the comprehensive plan under 
        that subsection.
            ``(B) Audits.--In-kind work to be credited under 
        subparagraph (A) shall be subject to audit.''.

SEC. 209. BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED MATERIAL.

    Section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 
U.S.C. 2326) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (c), by striking ``cooperative agreement in 
    accordance with the requirements of section 221 of the Flood 
    Control Act of 1970'' and inserting ``binding agreement with the 
    Secretary''; and
        (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), for any project carried out 
under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a nonprofit 
entity, with the consent of the affected local government.''.

SEC. 210. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

    Section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 
U.S.C. 2330) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (b)--
            (A) by striking ``Non-Federal'' and inserting the 
        following:
        ``(1) In general.--Non-Federal''; and
            (B) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(2) Form.--Before October 1, 2003, the Federal share of the 
    cost of a project under this section may be provided in the form of 
    reimbursements of project costs.''; and
        (2) in subsection (c)--
            (A) by striking ``Construction'' and inserting the 
        following:
        ``(1) In general.--Construction''; and
            (B) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(2) Nonprofit entities.--Notwithstanding section 221 of the 
    Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), for any project 
    carried out under this section, a non-Federal interest may include 
    a nonprofit entity, with the consent of the affected local 
    government.''.
    SEC. 211. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT, RESTORATION, AND DEVELOPMENT.
    Section 503 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3756) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (d)--
            (A) by striking paragraph (10) and inserting the following:
        ``(10) Regional Atlanta watershed, Atlanta, Georgia, and Lake 
    Lanier, Forsyth and Hall Counties, Georgia.''; and
            (B) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(14) Clear Lake watershed, California.
        ``(15) Fresno Slough watershed, California.
        ``(16) Hayward Marsh, Southern San Francisco Bay watershed, 
    California.
        ``(17) Kaweah River watershed, California.
        ``(18) Lake Tahoe watershed, California and Nevada.
        ``(19) Malibu Creek watershed, California.
        ``(20) Lower St. Johns River basin, Florida.
        ``(21) Illinois River watershed, Illinois.
        ``(22) Truckee River basin, Nevada.
        ``(23) Walker River basin, Nevada.
        ``(24) Bronx River watershed, New York.
        ``(25) Catawba River watershed, North Carolina.
        ``(26) Columbia Slough watershed, Oregon.
        ``(27) Cabin Creek basin, West Virginia.'';
        (2) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and
        (3) by inserting after subsection (d) the following:
    ``(e) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project 
undertaken under this section, a non-Federal interest may include a 
nonprofit entity, with the consent of the affected local government.''.

SEC. 212. FLOOD MITIGATION AND RIVERINE RESTORATION PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may undertake a program for the 
purpose of conducting projects to reduce flood hazards and restore the 
natural functions and values of rivers throughout the United States.
    (b) Studies and Projects.--
        (1) Authority.--In carrying out the program, the Secretary may 
    conduct studies to identify appropriate flood damage reduction, 
    conservation, and restoration measures and may design and implement 
    projects described in subsection (a).
        (2) Consultation and coordination.--The studies and projects 
    carried out under this section shall be conducted, to the maximum 
    extent practicable, in consultation and coordination with the 
    Federal Emergency Management Agency and other appropriate Federal 
    agencies, and in consultation and coordination with appropriate 
    State and local agencies and tribes.
        (3) Nonstructural approaches.--The studies and projects shall 
    emphasize, to the maximum extent practicable and appropriate, 
    nonstructural approaches to preventing or reducing flood damages.
        (4) Participation.--The studies and projects shall be 
    conducted, to the maximum extent practicable, in cooperation with 
    State and local agencies and tribes to ensure the coordination of 
    local flood damage reduction or riverine and wetland restoration 
    studies with projects that conserve, restore, and manage hydrologic 
    and hydraulic regimes and restore the natural functions and values 
    of floodplains.
    (c) Cost-Sharing Requirements.--
        (1) Studies.--Studies conducted under this section shall be 
    subject to cost sharing in accordance with section 105 of the Water 
    Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215).
        (2) Environmental restoration and nonstructural flood control 
    projects.--
            (A) In general.--The non-Federal interests shall pay 35 
        percent of the cost of any environmental restoration or 
        nonstructural flood control project carried out under this 
        section.
            (B) Items provided by non-federal interests.--The non-
        Federal interests shall provide all land, easements, rights-of-
        way, dredged material disposal areas, and relocations necessary 
        for such projects.
            (C) Credit.--The value of such land, easements, rights-of-
        way, dredged material disposal areas, and relocations shall be 
        credited toward the payment required under this paragraph.
        (3) Structural flood control projects.--Any structural flood 
    control projects carried out under this section shall be subject to 
    cost sharing in accordance with section 103(a) of the Water 
    Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(a)).
        (4) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal interests shall 
    be responsible for all costs associated with operating, 
    maintaining, replacing, repairing, and rehabilitating all projects 
    carried out under this section.
    (d) Project Justification.--
        (1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law or 
    requirement for economic justification established under section 
    209 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962-2), the 
    Secretary may implement a project under this section if the 
    Secretary determines that the project--
            (A) will significantly reduce potential flood damages;
            (B) will improve the quality of the environment; and
            (C) is justified considering all costs and beneficial 
        outputs of the project.
        (2) Establishment of selection and rating criteria and 
    policies.--
            (A) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in cooperation with State 
        and local agencies and tribes, shall--
                (i) develop, and submit to the Committee on 
            Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
            Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
            Works of the Senate, criteria for selecting and rating 
            projects to be carried out under this section; and
                (ii) establish policies and procedures for carrying out 
            the studies and projects undertaken under this section.
            (B) Criteria.--The criteria referred to in subparagraph 
        (A)(i) shall include, as a priority, the extent to which the 
        appropriate State government supports the project.
    (e) Priority Areas.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary 
shall examine appropriate locations, including--
        (1) Pima County, Arizona, at Paseo De Las Iglesias and Rillito 
    River;
        (2) Coachella Valley, Riverside County, California;
        (3) Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers, California;
        (4) Murrieta Creek, California;
        (5) Napa River Valley watershed, California, at Yountville, St. 
    Helena, Calistoga, and American Canyon;
        (6) Santa Clara basin, California, at Upper Guadalupe River and 
    Tributaries, San Francisquito Creek, and Upper Penitencia Creek;
        (7) Pond Creek, Kentucky;
        (8) Red River of the North, Minnesota, North Dakota, and South 
    Dakota;
        (9) Connecticut River, New Hampshire;
        (10) Pine Mount Creek, New Jersey;
        (11) Southwest Valley, Albuquerque, New Mexico;
        (12) Upper Delaware River, New York;
        (13) Briar Creek, North Carolina;
        (14) Chagrin River, Ohio;
        (15) Mill Creek, Cincinnati, Ohio;
        (16) Tillamook County, Oregon;
        (17) Willamette River basin, Oregon;
        (18) Blair County, Pennsylvania, at Altoona and Frankstown 
    Township;
        (19) Delaware River, Pennsylvania;
        (20) Schuylkill River, Pennsylvania;
        (21) Providence County, Rhode Island;
        (22) Shenandoah River, Virginia; and
        (23) Lincoln Creek, Wisconsin.
    (f) Program Review.--
        (1) In general.--The program established under this section 
    shall be subject to an independent review to evaluate the efficacy 
    of the program in achieving the dual goals of flood hazard 
    mitigation and riverine restoration.
        (2) Report.--Not later than April 15, 2003, the Secretary shall 
    submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
    House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and 
    Public Works of the Senate a report on the findings of the review 
    conducted under this subsection with any recommendations concerning 
    continuation of the program.
    (g) Maximum Federal Cost per Project.--Not more than $30,000,000 
may be expended by the United States on any single project under this 
section.
    (h) Procedure.--
        (1) All projects.--The Secretary shall not implement any 
    project under this section until--
            (A) the Secretary submits to the Committee on Environment 
        and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives a written notification describing the project 
        and the determinations made under subsection (d)(1); and
            (B) 21 calendar days have elapsed after the date on which 
        the notification was received by the committees.
        (2) Projects exceeding $15,000,000.--
            (A) Limitation on appropriations.--No appropriation shall 
        be made to construct any project under this section the total 
        Federal cost of construction of which exceeds $15,000,000 if 
        the project has not been approved by resolutions adopted by the 
        Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
        Works of the Senate.
            (B) Report.--For the purpose of securing consideration of 
        approval under this paragraph, the Secretary shall submit a 
        report on the proposed project, including all relevant data and 
        information on all costs.
    (i) Authorization of Appropriations.--
        (1) In general.--There are authorized to be appropriated to 
    carry out this section--
            (A) $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2001;
            (B) $30,000,000 for fiscal year 2002; and
            (C) $50,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2003 through 2005.
        (2)  Full funding.--All studies and projects carried out under 
    this section from Army Civil Works appropriations shall be fully 
    funded within the program funding levels provided in this 
    subsection.

SEC. 213. SHORE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.

    (a) Review.--The Secretary shall review the implementation of the 
Corps of Engineers shore management program, with particular attention 
to--
        (1) inconsistencies in implementation among the divisions and 
    districts of the Corps of Engineers; and
        (2) complaints by or potential inequities regarding property 
    owners in the Savannah District, including an accounting of the 
    number and disposition of complaints in the Savannah District 
    during the 5-year period preceding the date of enactment of this 
    Act.
    (b) Report.--As expeditiously as practicable, but not later than 1 
year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
submit to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
Works of the Senate a report describing the results of the review under 
subsection (a).

SEC. 214. SHORE DAMAGE PREVENTION OR MITIGATION.

    Section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (33 U.S.C. 426i) is 
amended--
        (1) in the first sentence--
            (A) by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting ``(a) In 
        General.--The Secretary''; and
            (B) by inserting after ``navigation works'' the following: 
        ``and shore damage attributable to the Atlantic Intracoastal 
        Waterway and the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway'';
        (2) in the second sentence, by striking ``The costs'' and 
    inserting the following:
    ``(b) Cost Sharing.--The costs'';
        (3) in the third sentence--
            (A) by striking ``No such'' and inserting the following:
    ``(c) Requirement for Specific Authorization.--No such''; and
            (B) by striking ``$2,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$5,000,000''; and
        (4) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Coordination.--The Secretary shall--
        ``(1) coordinate the implementation of the measures under this 
    section with other Federal and non-Federal shore protection 
    projects in the same geographic area; and
        ``(2) to the extent practicable, combine mitigation projects 
    with other shore protection projects in the same area into a 
    comprehensive regional project.''.

SEC. 215. SHORE PROTECTION.

    (a) Periodic Nourishment.--Section 103(d) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(d)) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``Costs of constructing'' and inserting the 
    following:
        ``(1) Construction.--Costs of constructing''; and
        (2) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(2) Periodic nourishment.--
            ``(A) In general.--In the case of a project authorized for 
        construction after December 31, 1999, or for which a 
        feasibility study is completed after that date, the non-Federal 
        cost of the periodic nourishment of the project, or any measure 
        for shore protection or beach erosion control for the project, 
        that is carried out--
                ``(i) after January 1, 2001, shall be 40 percent;
                ``(ii) after January 1, 2002, shall be 45 percent; and
                ``(iii) after January 1, 2003, shall be 50 percent.
            ``(B) Benefits to privately owned shores.--All costs 
        assigned to benefits of periodic nourishment projects or 
        measures to privately owned shores (where use of such shores is 
        limited to private interests) or to prevention of losses of 
        private land shall be borne by the non-Federal interest.
            ``(C) Benefits to federally owned shores.--All costs 
        assigned to the protection of federally owned shores for 
        periodic nourishment measures shall be borne by the United 
        States.''.
    (b) Outer Continental Shelf.--
        (1) Use of sand from outer continental shelf.--Section 
    8(k)(2)(B) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 
    1337(k)(2)(B)) is amended in the second sentence by striking ``an 
    agency of the Federal Government'' and inserting ``a Federal, 
    State, or local government agency''.
        (2) Reimbursement of local interests.--Any amounts paid by non-
    Federal interests for beach erosion control, hurricane protection, 
    shore protection, or storm damage reduction projects as a result of 
    an assessment under section 8(k) of the Outer Continental Shelf 
    Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337(k)) shall be fully reimbursed.
    (c) Report on Shores of the United States.--
        (1) In general.--Not later than 3 years after the date of 
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall report to Congress on 
    the state of the shores of the United States.
        (2) Contents.--The report shall include--
            (A) a description of--
                (i) the extent of, and economic and environmental 
            effects caused by, erosion and accretion along the shores 
            of the United States; and
                (ii) the causes of such erosion and accretion;
            (B) a description of resources committed by Federal, State, 
        and local governments to restore and renourish shores;
            (C) a description of the systematic movement of sand along 
        the shores of the United States; and
            (D) recommendations regarding--
                (i) appropriate levels of Federal and non-Federal 
            participation in shore protection; and
                (ii) use of a systems approach to sand management.
        (3) Use of specific location data.--In developing the report, 
    the Secretary shall use data from specific locations on the coasts 
    of the Atlantic Ocean, Pacific Ocean, Great Lakes, and Gulf of 
    Mexico.
    (d) National Coastal Data Bank.--
        (1) Establishment of data bank.--Not later than 2 years after 
    the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall establish a 
    national coastal data bank containing data on the geophysical and 
    climatological characteristics of the shores of the United States.
        (2) Content.--To the extent practicable, the national coastal 
    data bank shall include data regarding current and predicted shore 
    positions, information on federally authorized shore protection 
    projects, and data on the movement of sand along the shores of the 
    United States, including impediments to such movement caused by 
    natural and manmade features.
        (3) Access.--The national coastal data bank shall be made 
    readily accessible to the public.

SEC. 216. FLOOD PREVENTION COORDINATION.

    Section 206 of the Flood Control Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 709a) is 
amended--
        (1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections (c) 
    and (d), respectively; and
        (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
    ``(b) Flood Prevention Coordination.--The Secretary shall 
coordinate with the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
and the heads of other Federal agencies to ensure that flood control 
projects and plans are complementary and integrated to the extent 
practicable and appropriate.''.

SEC. 217. DISPOSAL OF DREDGED MATERIAL ON BEACHES.

    (a) In General.--Section 145 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 426j) is amended in the first sentence by striking 
``50'' and inserting ``35''.
    (b) Great Lakes Basin.--The Secretary shall work with the State of 
Ohio, other Great Lakes States, and political subdivisions of the 
States to fully implement and maximize beneficial reuse of dredged 
material as provided under section 145 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 426j).
    (c) Bolivar Peninsula, Jefferson, Chambers, and Galveston Counties, 
Texas.--The Secretary may design and construct a shore protection 
project between the south jetty of the Sabine Pass Channel and the 
north jetty of the Galveston Harbor Entrance Channel in Jefferson, 
Chambers, and Galveston Counties, Texas, including beneficial use of 
dredged material from Federal navigation projects as provided under 
section 145 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 
426j).
    (d) Galveston Beach, Galveston County, Texas.--The Secretary may 
design and construct a shore protection project between the Galveston 
South Jetty and San Luis Pass, Galveston County, Texas, using 
innovative nourishment techniques, including beneficial use of dredged 
material from Federal navigation projects as provided under section 145 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 426j).
    (e) Rollover Pass, Galveston County, Texas.--The Secretary may 
place dredged material from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway on the 
beaches along Rollover Pass, Galveston County, Texas, to stabilize 
beach erosion as provided under section 145 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1976 (33 U.S.C. 426j).

SEC. 218. ANNUAL PASSES FOR RECREATION.

    Section 208(c)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(16 U.S.C. 460d-3 note; 110 Stat. 3681) is amended by striking ``later 
of December 31, 1999, or the date of transmittal of the report under 
paragraph (3)'' and inserting ``December 31, 2003''.

SEC. 219. NONSTRUCTURAL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS.

    (a) Analysis of Benefits.--Section 308 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 2318) is amended--
        (1) in the heading of subsection (a), by inserting ``Exclusion 
    of Elements From'' before ``Benefit-Cost'';
        (2) by redesignating subsections (b) through (e) as subsections 
    (c) through (f), respectively;
        (3) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
    ``(b) Flood Damage Reduction Benefits.--
        ``(1) In general.--In calculating the benefits of a proposed 
    project for nonstructural flood damage reduction, the Secretary 
    shall calculate the benefits of the nonstructural project using 
    methods similar to those used for calculating the benefits of 
    structural projects, including similar treatment in calculating the 
    benefits from losses avoided.
        ``(2) Avoidance of double counting.--In carrying out paragraph 
    (1), the Secretary should avoid double counting of benefits.''; and
        (4) in subsection (d), by striking ``subsection (b)'' and 
    inserting ``subsection (c)''.
    (b) Reevaluation of Flood Control Projects.--At the request of a 
non-Federal interest for a flood control project, the Secretary shall 
conduct a reevaluation of a project authorized before the date of 
enactment of this Act to consider nonstructural alternatives in light 
of the amendments made by subsection (a).
    (c) Cost Sharing.--Section 103(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(b)) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``The non-Federal'' and inserting the 
    following:
        ``(1) In general.--The non-Federal''; and
        (2) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(2) Non-federal contribution in excess of 35 percent.--At any 
    time during construction of a project, if the Secretary determines 
    that the costs of land, easements, rights-of-way, dredged material 
    disposal areas, and relocations for the project, in combination 
    with other costs contributed by the non-Federal interests, will 
    exceed 35 percent, any additional costs for the project (not to 
    exceed 65 percent of the total costs of the project) shall be a 
    Federal responsibility and shall be contributed during construction 
    as part of the Federal share.''.

SEC. 220. LAKES PROGRAM.

    Section 602(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4148; 110 Stat. 3758) is amended--
        (1) in paragraph (14), by inserting ``and nutrient monitoring'' 
    after ``growth'';
        (2) in paragraph (15), by striking ``and'' at the end;
        (3) in paragraph (16), by striking the period at the end and 
    inserting a semicolon; and
        (4) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(17) Clear Lake, Lake County, California, removal of silt and 
    aquatic growth and measures to address excessive sedimentation and 
    high nutrient concentration;
        ``(18) Flints Pond, Hollis, Hillsborough County, New Hampshire, 
    removal of silt and aquatic growth and measures to address 
    excessive sedimentation; and
        ``(19) Osgood Pond, Milford, Hillsborough County, New 
    Hampshire, removal of silt and aquatic growth and measures to 
    address excessive sedimentation.''.

SEC. 221. ENHANCEMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES.

    Section 906(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2283(e)) is amended by inserting after the second sentence the 
following: ``Not more than 80 percent of the non-Federal share of such 
first costs may be satisfied through in-kind contributions, including 
facilities, supplies, and services that are necessary to carry out the 
enhancement project.''.
    SEC. 222. PURCHASE OF AMERICAN-MADE EQUIPMENT AND PRODUCTS.
    (a) In General.--It is the sense of Congress that, to the extent 
practicable, all equipment and products purchased with funds made 
available under this Act should be American made.
    (b) Notice to Recipients of Assistance.--In providing financial 
assistance under this Act, the Secretary, to the greatest extent 
practicable, shall provide to each recipient of the assistance a notice 
describing the statement made in subsection (a).
    SEC. 223. CONSTRUCTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS BY NON-FEDERAL 
      INTERESTS.
    (a) In General.--Section 211(d) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 701b-13(d)) is amended--
        (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``Any non-Federal interest 
    that has received from the Secretary pursuant to subsection (b) or 
    (c)'' and inserting the following:
            ``(A) Studies and design activities under subsection (b).--
                ``(i) In general.--A non-Federal interest may carry out 
            construction for which studies and design documents are 
            prepared under subsection (b) only if the Secretary 
            approves the project for construction.
                ``(ii) Criteria for approval.--The Secretary shall 
            approve a project for construction if the Secretary 
            determines that the project is technically sound, 
            economically justified, and environmentally acceptable and 
            meets the requirements for obtaining the appropriate 
            permits required under the authority of the Secretary.
                ``(iii) No unreasonable withholding of approval.--The 
            Secretary shall not unreasonably withhold approval of a 
            project for construction.
                ``(iv) No effect on regulatory authority.--Nothing in 
            this subparagraph affects any regulatory authority of the 
            Secretary.
            ``(B) Studies and design activities under subsection (c).--
        Any non-Federal interest that has received from the Secretary 
        under subsection (c)''; and
        (2) in the first sentence of paragraph (2), by inserting 
    ``(other than paragraph (1)(A))'' after ``this subsection''.
    (b) Reimbursement.--
        (1) In general.--Section 211(e)(1) of the Water Resources 
    Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 701b-13(e)(1)) is amended--
            (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by inserting 
        after ``constructed pursuant to this section'' the following: 
        ``and provide credit for the non-Federal share of the 
        project'';
            (B) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (C) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (D) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(C) if the construction work is substantially in 
        accordance with plans prepared under subsection (b).''.
        (2) Special rules.--Section 211(e)(2)(A) of the Water Resources 
    Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 701b-13(e)(2)(A)) is amended--
            (A) in the subparagraph heading, by inserting ``or credit'' 
        after ``Reimbursement'';
            (B) by striking ``subject to amounts being made available 
        in advance in appropriations Acts'' and inserting ``subject to 
        the availability of appropriations''; and
            (C) by inserting after ``the cost of such work'' the 
        following: ``, or provide credit (depending on the request of 
        the non-Federal interest) for the non-Federal share of such 
        work,''.
        (3) Schedule and manner of reimbursements.--Section 211(e) of 
    the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 701b-13(e)) 
    is amended by adding at the end the following:
        ``(6) Schedule and manner of reimbursement.--
            ``(A) Budgeting.--The Secretary shall budget and request 
        appropriations for reimbursements under this section on a 
        schedule that is consistent with a Federal construction 
        schedule.
            ``(B) Commencement of reimbursements.--Reimbursements under 
        this section may commence on approval of a project by the 
        Secretary.
            ``(C) Credit.--At the request of a non-Federal interest, 
        the Secretary may reimburse the non-Federal interest by 
        providing credit toward future non-Federal costs of the 
        project.
            ``(D) Scheduling.--Nothing in this paragraph affects the 
        discretion of the President to schedule new construction 
        starts.''.

SEC. 224. ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING.

    Section 312 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33 
U.S.C. 1272) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (b)--
            (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ``50'' and inserting 
        ``35''; and
            (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ``$20,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$50,000,000'';
        (2) in subsection (d), by striking ``non-Federal 
    responsibility'' and inserting ``shared as a cost of 
    construction''; and
        (3) in subsection (f), by adding at the end the following:
        ``(6) Passaic River and Newark Bay, New Jersey.
        ``(7) Snake Creek, Bixby, Oklahoma.
        ``(8) Willamette River, Oregon.''.

SEC. 225. RECREATION USER FEES.

    (a) Withholding of Amounts.--
        (1) In general.--During fiscal years 1999 through 2002, the 
    Secretary may withhold from the special account established under 
    section 4(i)(1)(A) of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 
    1965 (16 U.S.C. 460l-6a(i)(1)(A)) 100 percent of the amount of 
    receipts above a baseline of $34,000,000 per each fiscal year 
    received from fees imposed at recreation sites under the 
    administrative jurisdiction of the Department of the Army under 
    section 4(b) of that Act (16 U.S.C. 460l-6a(b)).
        (2) Use.--The amounts withheld shall be retained by the 
    Secretary and shall be available, without further Act of 
    appropriation, for expenditure by the Secretary in accordance with 
    subsection (b).
        (3) Availability.--The amounts withheld shall remain available 
    until September 30, 2005.
    (b) Use of Amounts Withheld.--In order to increase the quality of 
the visitor experience at public recreational areas and to enhance the 
protection of resources, the amounts withheld under subsection (a) may 
be used only for--
        (1) repair and maintenance projects (including projects 
    relating to health and safety);
        (2) interpretation;
        (3) signage;
        (4) habitat or facility enhancement;
        (5) resource preservation;
        (6) annual operation (including fee collection);
        (7) maintenance; and
        (8) law enforcement related to public use.
    (c) Availability.--Each amount withheld by the Secretary shall be 
available for expenditure, without further Act of appropriation, at the 
specific project from which the amount, above baseline, is collected.

SEC. 226. SMALL STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECTS.

    Section 3 of the Act of August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g), is 
amended by striking ``$2,000,000'' and inserting ``$3,000,000''.

SEC. 227. USE OF PRIVATE ENTERPRISES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall comply with the requirements 
of the Federal Activities Inventory Reform Act of 1998 (31 U.S.C. 501 
note; Public Law 105-270).
    (b) Compliance With Other Law.--
        (1) Inventory and review.--In carrying out this section, the 
    Secretary shall inventory and review all activities that are not 
    inherently governmental in nature in accordance with the Federal 
    Activities Inventory Reform Act of 1998.
        (2) Architectural and engineering services.--Any review and 
    conversion by the Secretary to performance by private enterprise of 
    an architectural or engineering service (including a surveying or 
    mapping service) shall be carried out in accordance with title IX 
    of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (40 
    U.S.C. 541 et seq.).

                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

    SEC. 301. TENNESSEE-TOMBIGBEE WATERWAY WILDLIFE MITIGATION, ALABAMA 
      AND MISSISSIPPI.
    The Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway Wildlife Mitigation Project, 
Alabama and Mississippi, authorized by section 601(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4138), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to complete the project at a cost of 
$93,530,000, in accordance with the post authorization change report 
dated August 17, 1998.

SEC. 302. OUZINKIE HARBOR, ALASKA.

    (a) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of Federal 
funds that may be expended for the project for navigation, Ouzinkie 
Harbor, Alaska, shall be $8,500,000.
    (b) Revision of Project Cooperation Agreement.--The Secretary shall 
revise the project cooperation agreement for the project referred to in 
subsection (a) to take into account the change in the Federal 
participation in the project under subsection (a).

SEC. 303. ST. PAUL HARBOR, ST. PAUL, ALASKA.

    The project for navigation, St. Paul Harbor, St. Paul, Alaska, 
authorized by section 101(b)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3667), is modified to include the construction of 
additional features for a small boat harbor with an entrance channel 
and maneuvering area dredged to a 20-foot depth and appropriate wave 
protection features at an additional estimated total cost of 
$12,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $5,000,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $7,700,000.
    SEC. 304. LOGGY BAYOU, RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM, ARKANSAS, 
      LOUISIANA, OKLAHOMA, AND TEXAS.
    The project for flood control on the Red River below Denison Dam, 
Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas, authorized by section 10 of 
the Flood Control Act of 1946 (60 Stat. 647), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to conduct a study to determine the feasibility of expanding 
the project to include mile 0.0 to mile 7.8 of Loggy Bayou between the 
Red River and Flat River.

SEC. 305. SACRAMENTO RIVER, GLENN-COLUSA, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Sacramento River, 
California, authorized by section 2 of the Act entitled ``An Act to 
provide for the control of the floods of the Mississippi River and of 
the Sacramento River, California, and for other purposes'', approved 
March 1, 1917 (39 Stat. 949), and modified by section 102 of the Energy 
and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1990 (103 Stat. 649), section 
301(b)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
3110), and title I of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations 
Act, 1999 (112 Stat. 1841), is further modified to authorize the 
Secretary--
        (1) to carry out the portion of the project at Glenn-Colusa, 
    California, at a total cost of $26,000,000, with an estimated 
    Federal cost of $20,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
    $6,000,000; and
        (2) to carry out bank stabilization work in the riverbed 
    gradient facility, particularly in the vicinity of River Mile 208, 
    if the Secretary determines that such work is necessary to protect 
    the overall integrity of the project, on the condition that 
    additional environmental review of the project is conducted.

SEC. 306. SAN LORENZO RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood control, San Lorenzo River, California, 
authorized by section 101(a)(5) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3663), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
include as a part of the project streambank erosion control measures to 
be undertaken substantially in accordance with the report entitled 
``Bank Stabilization Concept, Laurel Street Extension'', dated April 
23, 1998, at a total cost of $4,800,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
of $3,100,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $1,700,000.

SEC. 307. TERMINUS DAM, KAWEAH RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Transfer of Title to Additional Land.--If the non-Federal 
interests for the project for flood control and water supply, Terminus 
Dam, Kaweah River, California, authorized by section 101(b)(5) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3667), transfer to 
the Secretary without consideration title to perimeter lands acquired 
for the project by the non-Federal interests, the Secretary may accept 
the transfer of that title.
    (b) Land, Easements, and Rights-of-Way.--Nothing in this section 
changes, modifies, or otherwise affects the responsibility of the non-
Federal interests to provide land, easements, rights-of-way, 
relocations, and dredged material disposal areas necessary for the 
Terminus Dam project and to perform operation and maintenance for the 
project.
    (c) Operation and Maintenance.--On request by the non-Federal 
interests, the Secretary shall carry out operation, maintenance, 
repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of the project if the non-
Federal interests enter into a binding agreement with the Secretary to 
reimburse the Secretary for 100 percent of the costs of such operation, 
maintenance, repair, replacement, and rehabilitation, and any other 
expenses incurred by the Corps of Engineers under this section.
    (d) Hold Harmless.--The non-Federal interests shall hold the United 
States harmless for ownership, operation, and maintenance of lands and 
facilities of the Terminus Dam project title to which is transferred to 
the Secretary under this section.
    SEC. 308. DELAWARE RIVER MAINSTEM AND CHANNEL DEEPENING, DELAWARE, 
      NEW JERSEY, AND PENNSYLVANIA.
    The project for navigation, Delaware River Mainstem and Channel 
Deepening, Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania, authorized by 
section 101(6) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4802), is modified as follows:
        (1) Credit for engineering and design and construction 
    management work.--The Secretary may provide the non-Federal 
    interests credit, toward cash contributions required for 
    construction and subsequent to construction, for the costs of 
    engineering and design and construction management work that is 
    performed by the non-Federal interests and that the Secretary 
    determines is necessary to implement the project. Any such credit 
    shall reduce the Philadelphia District's private sector performance 
    goals for engineering work by the amount of the credit.
        (2) Credit for costs of construction.--The Secretary may 
    provide the non-Federal interests credit, toward cash contributions 
    required during construction and subsequent to construction, for 
    the costs of construction performed by the non-Federal interests on 
    behalf of the Secretary and that the Secretary determines is 
    necessary to implement the project.
        (3) Payment of disposal or tipping fees.--The Secretary may 
    enter into an agreement with a non-Federal interest for the payment 
    of disposal or tipping fees for dredged material from a Federal 
    project, other than for the construction or operation and 
    maintenance of the new deepening project as described in the 
    Limited Reevaluation Report dated May 1997, if the non-Federal 
    interest has supplied the corresponding disposal capacity.
        (4) Disposal area management plan.--The Secretary may enter 
    into an agreement with a non-Federal interest under which--
            (A) the non-Federal interest may carry out or cause to have 
        carried out on behalf of the Secretary a disposal area 
        management program for dredged material disposal areas 
        necessary to construct, operate, and maintain the project; and
            (B) the Secretary shall reimburse the non-Federal interest 
        for the costs of carrying out the program.

SEC. 309. POTOMAC RIVER, WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

    The project for flood control, Potomac River, Washington, District 
of Columbia, authorized by section 5 of the Act of June 22, 1936 (49 
Stat. 1574, chapter 688), and modified by section 301(a)(4) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3707), is modified 
to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at a Federal cost 
of $5,965,000, in accordance with the post authorization change report 
dated June 29, 1998.

SEC. 310. BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA.

    (a) Study.--Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary, in cooperation with the non-Federal interest, 
shall complete a study of any damage to the project for shore 
protection, Brevard County, Florida, authorized by section 101(b)(7) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3667), to 
determine whether the damage is the result of a Federal navigation 
project.
    (b) Conditions.--In conducting the study, the Secretary shall use 
the services of an independent coastal expert, who shall consider all 
relevant studies completed by the Corps of Engineers and the local 
sponsor of the project.
    (c) Mitigation of Damage.--After completion of the study, the 
Secretary shall mitigate any damage to the shore protection project 
that is the result of a Federal navigation project. The costs of the 
mitigation shall be allocated to the Federal navigation project as 
operation and maintenance costs.

SEC. 311. BROWARD COUNTY AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLORIDA.

    The project for shore protection, Broward County and Hillsboro 
Inlet, Florida, authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1965 (79 Stat. 1090), is modified to authorize the Secretary, on 
execution of a contract to construct the project, to reimburse the non-
Federal interest for the Federal share of the cost of preconstruction 
planning and design for the project, if the Secretary determines that 
the work is compatible with and integral to the project.
    SEC. 312. LEE COUNTY, CAPTIVA ISLAND SEGMENT, FLORIDA, PERIODIC 
      BEACH NOURISHMENT.
    (a) In General.--The project for shore protection, Lee County, 
Captiva Island segment, Florida, authorized by section 506(b)(3)(A) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3758), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to enter into an agreement with the 
non-Federal interest to carry out the project in accordance with 
section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 
426i-1).
    (b) Decision Document.--The design memorandum approved in 1996 
shall be the decision document supporting continued Federal 
participation in cost sharing of the project.

SEC. 313. FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA.

    (a) In General.--The project for shore protection and harbor 
mitigation, Fort Pierce, Florida, authorized by section 301 of the 
River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1092) and section 506(a)(2) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3757), is 
modified to incorporate 1 additional mile into the project in 
accordance with a final approved general reevaluation report, at a 
total cost for initial nourishment for the entire project of 
$9,128,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $7,073,500 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $2,054,500, at an average annual cost of 
$556,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, 
with an estimated annual Federal cost of $431,000 and an estimated 
annual non-Federal cost of $125,000.
    (b) Periodic Beach Nourishment.--Periodic beach nourishment is 
authorized for the project in accordance with section 506(a)(2) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3757).

SEC. 314. NASSAU COUNTY, FLORIDA.

    The project for beach erosion control, Nassau County (Amelia 
Island), Florida, authorized by section 3(a)(3) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4013), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of $17,000,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $13,300,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $3,700,000, at an average annual cost of $1,177,000 for 
periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an 
estimated annual Federal cost of $807,000 and an estimated annual non-
Federal cost of $370,000.

SEC. 315. MIAMI HARBOR CHANNEL, FLORIDA.

    The project for navigation, Miami Harbor Channel, Florida, 
authorized by section 101(a)(9) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1990 (104 Stat. 4606), is modified to include construction of 
artificial reefs and related environmental mitigation required by 
Federal, State, and local environmental permitting agencies for the 
project, if the Secretary determines that the project as modified is 
technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and economically 
justified.

SEC. 316. ST. AUGUSTINE, ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FLORIDA.

    The project for shore protection and storm damage reduction, St. 
Augustine, St. Johns County, Florida, authorized by section 501(a) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4133) is 
modified to include navigation mitigation as a project purpose and to 
be carried out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with the 
general reevaluation report dated November 18, 1998, at a total cost of 
$17,208,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $13,852,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $3,356,000, and at an estimated average 
annual cost of $1,360,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year 
life of the project, with an estimated annual Federal cost of 
$1,095,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal cost of $265,000.

SEC. 317. MILO CREEK, IDAHO.

    The Secretary shall reimburse the non-Federal interests for 65 
percent of the reasonable costs of flood control for the South Division 
Street Segment, Milo Creek Flood Control Project, Idaho, to be 
constructed by the State of Idaho as described in the provision 
entitled ``Add Alternative I'' in the Milo Creek Phase II plans and 
specifications dated April 1999.

SEC. 318. LAKE MICHIGAN, ILLINOIS.

    (a) In General.--The project for storm damage reduction and shore 
protection, Lake Michigan, Illinois, from Wilmette, Illinois, to the 
Illinois-Indiana State line, authorized by section 101(a)(12) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3664), is modified 
to provide for reimbursement for additional project work undertaken by 
the non-Federal interest.
    (b) Credit or Reimbursement.--The Secretary shall credit or 
reimburse the non-Federal interest for the Federal share of project 
costs incurred by the non-Federal interest in designing, constructing, 
or reconstructing reach 2F (700 feet south of Fullerton Avenue and 500 
feet north of Fullerton Avenue), reach 3M (Meigs Field), and segments 7 
and 8 of reach 4 (43rd Street to 57th Street), if the non-Federal 
interest carries out the work in accordance with plans approved by the 
Secretary, at an estimated total cost of $83,300,000.
    (c) Reimbursement.--The Secretary shall reimburse the non-Federal 
interest for the Federal share of project costs incurred by the non-
Federal interest in reconstructing the revetment structures protecting 
Solidarity Drive in Chicago, Illinois, before the signing of the 
project cooperation agreement, at an estimated total cost of 
$7,600,000.

SEC. 319. SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS.

    Section 417 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3743) is amended--
        (1) by inserting ``(a) In General.--'' before ``The 
    Secretary''; and
        (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of assistance provided 
under this section before, on, or after the date of enactment of this 
subsection shall be 50 percent.''.

SEC. 320. OGDEN DUNES, INDIANA.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of beach erosion in 
and around the town of Ogden Dunes, Indiana, to determine whether the 
damage is the result of a Federal navigation project.
    (b) Mitigation of Damage.--If the Secretary determines that the 
damage described in subsection (a) is the result of a Federal 
navigation project, the Secretary shall take appropriate measures to 
mitigate the damage.
    (c) Cost.--The cost of the mitigation shall be allocated to the 
Federal navigation project as an operation and maintenance cost.

SEC. 321. SAINT JOSEPH RIVER, SOUTH BEND, INDIANA.

    (a) Maximum Total Expenditure.--The maximum total expenditure for 
the project for streambank erosion, recreation, and pedestrian access 
features, Saint Joseph River, South Bend, Indiana, shall be $7,800,000.
    (b) Revision of Project Cooperation Agreement.--The Secretary shall 
revise the project cooperation agreement for the project referred to in 
subsection (a) to take into account the change in the Federal 
participation in the project under subsection (a).

SEC. 322. WHITE RIVER, INDIANA.

    The project for flood control, Indianapolis on West Fork of the 
White River, Indiana, authorized by section 5 of the Act entitled ``An 
Act authorizing the construction of certain public works on rivers and 
harbors for flood control, and other purposes'', approved June 22, 1936 
(49 Stat. 1586, chapter 688), as modified by section 323 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3716), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to undertake the riverfront alterations 
described in the Central Indianapolis Waterfront Concept Plan, dated 
February 1994, for the Canal Development (Upper Canal feature) and the 
Beveridge Paper feature, at a total cost not to exceed $25,000,000, of 
which $12,500,000 is the estimated Federal cost and $12,500,000 is the 
estimated non-Federal cost, except that no such alterations may be 
undertaken unless the Secretary determines that the alterations 
authorized by this section, in combination with the alterations 
undertaken under section 323 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (110 Stat. 3716), are economically justified.

SEC. 323. DUBUQUE, IOWA.

    The project for navigation, Dubuque, Iowa, authorized by section 
101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 482), is modified to 
authorize the development of a wetland demonstration area of 
approximately 1.5 acres to be developed and operated by the Dubuque 
County Historical Society or a successor nonprofit organization.

SEC. 324. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LOUISIANA.

    The project for hurricane-flood protection, Lake Pontchartrain, 
Louisiana, authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 
(79 Stat. 1077), is modified--
        (1) to direct the Secretary to conduct a study to determine the 
    feasibility of constructing a pump adjacent to each of the 4 
    proposed drainage structures for the Saint Charles Parish feature 
    of the project; and
        (2) to authorize the Secretary to construct the pumps, with a 
    Federal cost of 65 percent, if the Secretary determines that the 
    project as modified is technically sound, environmentally 
    acceptable, and economically justified.

SEC. 325. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LOUISIANA.

    The project for hurricane protection Larose to Golden Meadow, 
Louisiana, authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 
(79 Stat. 1077), is modified to authorize the Secretary to convert the 
Golden Meadow floodgate into a navigation lock if the Secretary 
determines that the conversion is technically feasible, environmentally 
acceptable, and economically justified.

SEC. 326. LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY LEVEE, LOUISIANA.

    The Secretary may credit against the non-Federal share work 
performed in the project area of the Louisiana State Penitentiary 
Levee, Mississippi River, Louisiana, authorized by section 401(a) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4117).

SEC. 327. TWELVE-MILE BAYOU, CADDO PARISH, LOUISIANA.

    The Red River Below Denison Dam project, authorized by section 10 
of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (60 Stat. 647), is modified to 
incorporate the Twelve-Mile Bayou and levee from its confluence with 
the Red River and levee approximately 26 miles upstream to the vicinity 
of Black Bayou, Caddo Parish, Louisiana.
    SEC. 328. WEST BANK OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER (EAST OF HARVEY 
      CANAL), LOUISIANA.
    (a) In General.--The project to prevent flood damage and for 
hurricane damage reduction, west bank of the Mississippi River (east of 
Harvey Canal), Louisiana, authorized by section 401(b) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4128) and section 
101(a)(17) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
3665), is modified to direct the Secretary to continue Federal 
operation and maintenance of the portion of the project included in the 
report of the Chief of Engineers dated May 1, 1995, referred to as 
``Algiers Channel''.
    (b) Combination of Projects.--The Secretary shall carry out work 
authorized as part of the Westwego to Harvey Canal project, the East of 
Harvey Canal project, and the Lake Cataouatche modifications as a 
single project, to be known as the ``West Bank and Vicinity, New 
Orleans, Louisiana, Hurricane Protection Project'', with a combined 
total cost of $280,300,000.

SEC. 329. TOLCHESTER CHANNEL S-TURN, BALTIMORE, MARYLAND.

    The project for navigation, Baltimore Harbor and Channels, 
Maryland, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 
(72 Stat. 297), is modified to direct the Secretary to straighten the 
Tolchester Channel S-turn as part of project maintenance.

SEC. 330. SAULT SAINTE MARIE, CHIPPEWA COUNTY, MICHIGAN.

    The project for navigation Sault Sainte Marie, Chippewa County, 
Michigan, authorized by section 1149 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4254) and modified by section 330 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3717), is further modified 
to provide that the amount to be paid by non-Federal interests under 
section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2211(a)) and section 330(a) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 shall not include any interest payments.

SEC. 331. JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.

    The project for environmental infrastructure, Jackson County, 
Mississippi, authorized by section 219(c)(5) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835) and modified by section 504 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3757), is 
further modified to direct the Secretary to provide a credit, not to 
exceed $5,000,000, toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project for the costs incurred by the Jackson County Board of 
Supervisors since February 8, 1994, in constructing the project, if the 
Secretary determines that the work is compatible with and integral to 
the project.

SEC. 332. BOIS BRULE DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, MISSOURI.

    (a) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of Federal 
funds that may be allocated for the project for flood control, Bois 
Brule Drainage and Levee District, Missouri, authorized under section 
205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), is $15,000,000.
    (b) Revision of Project Cooperation Agreement.--The Secretary shall 
revise the project cooperation agreement for the project referred to in 
subsection (a) to take into account the change in Federal participation 
in the project under subsection (a).
    (c) Cost Sharing.--Nothing in this section affects any cost-sharing 
requirement applicable to the project referred to in subsection (a) 
under title I of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
2211 et seq.).

SEC. 333. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, VALLEY PARK LEVEE, MISSOURI.

    The project for flood control, Meramec River Basin, Valley Park 
Levee, Missouri, authorized by section 2(h) of the Act entitled ``An 
Act to deauthorize several projects within the jurisdiction of the Army 
Corps of Engineers'' (Public Law 97-128; 95 Stat. 1682) and modified by 
section 1128 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
4246), is further modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the 
project at a maximum Federal expenditure of $35,000,000, if the 
Secretary determines that the project as modified is technically sound, 
environmentally acceptable, and economically justified.
    SEC. 334. MISSOURI RIVER MITIGATION PROJECT, MISSOURI, KANSAS, 
      IOWA, AND NEBRASKA.
    (a) In General.--The project for mitigation of fish and wildlife 
losses, Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project, 
Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, and Nebraska, authorized by section 601(a) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4143) is 
modified to increase by 118,650 acres the amount of land and interests 
in land to be acquired for the project.
    (b) Study.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary, in conjunction with the States 
    of Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, and Nebraska, shall conduct a study to 
    determine the cost of restoring, under the authority of the 
    Missouri River fish and wildlife mitigation project, a total of 
    118,650 acres of lost Missouri River fish and wildlife habitat.
        (2) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall report to Congress on 
    the results of the study.

SEC. 335. WOOD RIVER, GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA.

    The project for flood control, Wood River, Grand Island, Nebraska, 
authorized by section 101(a)(19) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3665), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
construct the project substantially in accordance with the report of 
the Corps of Engineers dated June 29, 1998, at a total cost of 
$17,039,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $9,730,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $7,309,000.

SEC. 336. ABSECON ISLAND, NEW JERSEY.

    The project for storm damage reduction and shore protection, 
Brigantine Inlet to Great Egg Harbor Inlet, Absecon Island, New Jersey, 
authorized by section 101(b)(13) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3668), is modified to provide that if, after October 
12, 1996, the non-Federal interests carry out any work associated with 
the project that is later recommended by the Chief of Engineers and 
approved by the Secretary, the Secretary may provide the non-Federal 
interests credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project in an amount equal to the Federal share of the cost of the 
work, without interest.
    SEC. 337. NEW YORK HARBOR AND ADJACENT CHANNELS, PORT JERSEY, NEW 
      JERSEY.
    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, New York Harbor and 
Adjacent Channels, New York and New Jersey, authorized by section 
202(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4098), 
is further modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the portion 
of the project that is located between Military Ocean Terminal Bayonne 
and Global Terminal in Bayonne, New Jersey, at a total cost of 
$103,267,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $76,909,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $26,358,000.
    (b) Limitation.--No funds may be obligated to carry out work under 
the modification under subsection (a) until completion of a final 
report by the Chief of Engineers finding that the work is technically 
sound, environmentally acceptable, and economically justified.

SEC. 338. ARTHUR KILL, NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Arthur Kill, New York 
and New Jersey, authorized by section 202(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4098) and modified by section 
301(b)(11) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
3711), is further modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the 
project substantially in accordance with the report of the Corps of 
Engineers dated July 23, 1999, at a total cost of $315,700,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $183,200,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $132,500,000.
    (b) Credit.--The Secretary may provide non-Federal interests--
        (1) credit toward cash contributions required prior to and 
    during construction and subsequent to construction for planning, 
    engineering, and design and construction management work that is 
    performed by non-Federal interests and that the Secretary 
    determines is necessary to implement the project; and
        (2) credit toward cash contributions required during 
    construction and subsequent to construction for the costs of 
    construction carried out by the non-Federal interest on behalf of 
    the Secretary and that the Secretary determines is necessary to 
    implement the project.
    SEC. 339. KILL VAN KULL AND NEWARK BAY CHANNELS, NEW YORK AND NEW 
      JERSEY.
    The project for navigation, Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay Channels, 
New York and New Jersey, authorized by chapter IV of title I of the 
Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (99 Stat. 313), section 202(a) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4095), and 
section 301(b)(12) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3711), is further modified to authorize the Secretary to provide 
the non-Federal interests credit toward cash contributions required--
        (1) before, during, and after construction for planning, 
    engineering and design, and construction management work that is 
    performed by the non-Federal interests and that the Secretary 
    determines is necessary to implement the project; and
        (2) during and after construction for the costs of the 
    construction that the non-Federal interests carry out on behalf of 
    the Secretary and that the Secretary determines is necessary to 
    implement the project.

SEC. 340. NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED.

    Section 552 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3779) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (d), by striking ``for the project to be 
    carried out with such assistance'' and inserting ``, or a public 
    entity designated by the State director, to carry out the project 
    with the assistance, subject to the project's meeting the 
    certification requirement of subsection (c)(1)''; and
        (2) in subsection (i), by striking ``$22,500,000'' and 
    inserting ``$42,500,000''.

SEC. 341. NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM.

    Section 553(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3781) is amended by striking ``$8,000,000'' and inserting 
``$18,000,000''.

SEC. 342. FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, NEW YORK.

    The project for combined beach erosion control and hurricane 
protection, Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, Long Island, New York, 
authorized by section 101(a) of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 
Stat. 483) and modified by the River and Harbor Act of 1962, the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1974, and the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986, is further modified to direct the Secretary, in 
coordination with the heads of other Federal departments and agencies, 
to complete all procedures and reviews expeditiously and to adopt and 
submit to Congress, not later than 120 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, a mutually acceptable shore erosion plan for the Fire 
Island Inlet to Moriches Inlet reach of the project.

SEC. 343. BROKEN BOW LAKE, RED RIVER BASIN, OKLAHOMA.

    The project for flood control and water supply, Broken Bow Lake, 
Red River Basin, Oklahoma, authorized by section 203 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 309) and modified by section 203 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1187), section 102(v) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4808), and section 338 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3720), is 
further modified to require the Secretary to make seasonal adjustments 
to the top of the conservation pool at the project, if the Secretary 
determines that the adjustments will be undertaken at no cost to the 
United States and will adequately protect affected water and related 
resources, as follows:
        (1) Maintain an elevation of 599.5 from November 1 through 
    March 31.
        (2) Increase elevation gradually from 599.5 to 602.5 during 
    April and May.
        (3) Maintain an elevation of 602.5 from June 1 to September 30.
        (4) Decrease elevation gradually from 602.5 to 599.5 during 
    October.
    SEC. 344. WILLAMETTE RIVER TEMPERATURE CONTROL, MCKENZIE SUBBASIN, 
      OREGON.
    (a) In General.--The project for environmental restoration, 
Willamette River Temperature Control, McKenzie Subbasin, Oregon, 
authorized by section 101(a)(25) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3665), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
construct the project substantially in accordance with the Feature 
Memorandum dated July 31, 1998, at a total cost of $64,741,000, if the 
Secretary determines that the project as modified is technically sound 
and environmentally acceptable.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report that--
        (1) states the reasons for the increase in the cost of the 
    project;
        (2) outlines the steps that the Corps of Engineers is taking to 
    control project costs, including the application of value 
    engineering and other appropriate measures; and
        (3) includes a cost estimate for, and recommendations on the 
    advisability of, adding fish screens to the project.

SEC. 345. CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 562 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3784) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting the following:
    ``(a) In General.--The Secretary''; and
        (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Recreation Facilities.--The Secretary--
        ``(1) may provide design and construction assistance for 
    recreational facilities at Curwensville Lake; and
        ``(2) may require the non-Federal interest to provide not more 
    than 25 percent of the cost of designing and constructing the 
    recreational facilities.''.

SEC. 346. DELAWARE RIVER, PENNSYLVANIA AND DELAWARE.

    The project for navigation, Delaware River, Philadelphia to 
Wilmington, Pennsylvania and Delaware, authorized by section 3(a)(12) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4014), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to extend the channel of the 
Delaware River at Camden, New Jersey, to within 150 feet of the 
existing bulkhead and to relocate the 40-foot deep Federal navigation 
channel, eastward within Philadelphia Harbor, from the Ben Franklin 
Bridge to the Walt Whitman Bridge, into deep water, if the Secretary 
determines that the project as modified is technically sound, 
economically acceptable, and economically justified.

SEC. 347. MUSSERS DAM, PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 209 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4830) is amended--
        (1) by striking subsection (e); and
        (2) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (e).

SEC. 348. PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 564(c)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3785) is amended by striking ``$2,700,000'' and inserting 
``$4,000,000''.

SEC. 349. NINE MILE RUN, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.

    If the Secretary determines that the documentation is integral to 
the project, the Secretary shall credit against the non-Federal share 
such costs, not to exceed $1,000,000, as are incurred by the non-
Federal interests in preparing the environmental restoration report, 
planning and design-phase scientific and engineering technical services 
documentation, and other preconstruction documentation for the habitat 
restoration project, Nine Mile Run, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 350. RAYSTOWN LAKE, PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) Recreation Partnership Initiative.--Section 519(b) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2328 note; 110 Stat. 3765) 
is amended--
        (1) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and
        (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following:
        ``(3) Engineering and design services.--The Secretary may 
    perform engineering and design services for project infrastructure 
    expected to be associated with the development of the site at 
    Raystown Lake, Hesston, Pennsylvania.''.
    (b) Construction Assistance.--
        (1) In general.--Consistent with the master plan described in 
    section 318 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
    Stat. 4848), the Secretary may provide a grant to Juniata College 
    for the construction of facilities and structures at Raystown Lake, 
    Pennsylvania, to interpret and understand environmental conditions 
    and trends. As a condition of the receipt of financial assistance, 
    officials at Juniata College shall coordinate the construction with 
    the Baltimore District of the Army Corps of Engineers.
        (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
    appropriated to carry out this subsection $5,000,000.

SEC. 351. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 313(g)(1) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4846; 110 Stat. 
3723) is amended by striking ``$80,000,000'' and inserting 
``$180,000,000''.
    (b) Corps of Engineers Expenses.--Section 313(g) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4846) is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
        ``(4) Corps of engineers expenses.--10 percent of the amounts 
    appropriated to carry out this section for each of fiscal years 
    2000 through 2002 may be used by the Corps of Engineers district 
    offices to administer and implement projects under this section at 
    100 percent Federal expense.''.
    SEC. 352. FOX POINT HURRICANE BARRIER, PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND.
    The project for hurricane-flood protection, Fox Point, Providence, 
Rhode Island, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 
1958 (72 Stat. 306), is modified to direct the Secretary to undertake 
the necessary repairs to the barrier, as identified in the Condition 
Survey and Technical Assessment dated April 1998, with Supplement dated 
August 1998, at a total cost of $3,000,000, with an estimated Federal 
cost of $1,950,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $1,050,000.

SEC. 353. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    (a) In General.--The project for rediversion, Cooper River, 
Charleston Harbor, South Carolina, authorized by section 101 of the 
River and Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731) and modified by title I of 
the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1992 (105 Stat. 
517), is further modified to authorize the Secretary to pay to the 
State of South Carolina not more than $3,750,000 if the Secretary and 
the State enter into a binding agreement for the State to perform all 
future operation of the fish lift at St. Stephen, South Carolina, 
including performance of studies to assess the efficacy of the fish 
lift.
    (b) Contents of Agreement.--The agreement under subsection (a) 
shall specify--
        (1) the terms and conditions under which payment will be made; 
    and
        (2) the rights of, and remedies available to, the Federal 
    Government to recover all or a portion of the payment if the State 
    suspends or terminates operation of the fish lift or fails to 
    operate the fish lift in a manner satisfactory to the Secretary.
    (c) Maintenance.--Maintenance of the fish lift shall remain a 
Federal responsibility.

SEC. 354. CLEAR CREEK, TEXAS.

    Section 575 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3789) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (a)--
            (A) by inserting ``or nonstructural actions'' after ``flood 
        control works constructed''; and
            (B) by inserting ``or nonstructural actions'' after 
        ``construction of the project''; and
        (2) in subsection (b)--
            (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (B) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (C) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(4) the project for flood control, Clear Creek, Texas, 
    authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (82 
    Stat. 742).''.

SEC. 355. CYPRESS CREEK, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Cypress Creek, 
Texas, authorized by section 3(a)(13) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4014), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to carry out a nonstructural flood control project at a total 
cost of $5,000,000.
    (b) Reimbursement for Work.--The Secretary may reimburse the non-
Federal interest for the Cypress Creek project for work done by the 
non-Federal interest on the nonstructural flood control project in an 
amount equal to the estimate of the Federal share, without interest, of 
the cost of the work--
        (1) if, after authorization and before initiation of 
    construction of the nonstructural project, the Secretary approves 
    the plans for construction of the nonstructural project by the non-
    Federal interest; and
        (2) if the Secretary finds, after a review of studies and 
    design documents prepared to carry out the nonstructural project, 
    that construction of the nonstructural project is economically 
    justified and environmentally acceptable.

SEC. 356. DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION, DALLAS, TEXAS.

    The project for flood control, Dallas Floodway Extension, Dallas, 
Texas, authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 
(79 Stat. 1091) and modified by section 351 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3724), is further modified to add 
environmental restoration and recreation as project purposes.

SEC. 357. UPPER JORDAN RIVER, UTAH.

    The project for flood control, Upper Jordan River, Utah, authorized 
by section 101(a)(23) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
(104 Stat. 4610) and modified by section 301(a)(14) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3709), is further modified 
to direct the Secretary to carry out the locally preferred project, 
entitled ``Upper Jordan River Flood Control Project, Salt Lake County, 
Utah--Supplemental Information'' and identified in the document of Salt 
Lake County, Utah, dated July 30, 1998, at a total cost of $12,870,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $8,580,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $4,290,000, if the Secretary determines that the 
project as modified is technically sound, environmentally acceptable, 
and economically justified.

SEC. 358. ELIZABETH RIVER, CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, after September 30, 
1999, the city of Chesapeake, Virginia, shall not be obligated to make 
the annual cash contribution required under paragraph 1(9) of the Local 
Cooperation Agreement dated December 12, 1978, between the Government 
and the city for the project for navigation, southern branch of the 
Elizabeth River, Chesapeake, Virginia.

SEC. 359. COLUMBIA RIVER CHANNEL, WASHINGTON AND OREGON.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Columbia River between 
Vancouver, Washington, and The Dalles, Oregon, authorized by the first 
section of the Act of July 24, 1946 (60 Stat. 637, chapter 595), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to construct an alternate barge 
channel to traverse the high span of the Interstate Route 5 bridge 
between Portland, Oregon, and Vancouver, Washington, to a depth of 17 
feet, with a width of approximately 200 feet through the high span of 
the bridge and a width of approximately 300 feet upstream of the 
bridge.
    (b) Distance Upstream.--The channel shall continue upstream of the 
bridge approximately 2,500 feet to about river mile 107, then to a 
point of convergence with the main barge channel at about river mile 
108.
    (c) Distance Downstream.--
        (1) Southern edge.--The southern edge of the channel shall 
    continue downstream of the bridge approximately 1,500 feet to river 
    mile 106+10, then turn northwest to tie into the edge of the Upper 
    Vancouver Turning Basin.
        (2) Northern edge.--The northern edge of the channel shall 
    continue downstream of the bridge to the Upper Vancouver Turning 
    Basin.

SEC. 360. GREENBRIER RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 579(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3790) is amended by striking ``$12,000,000'' and inserting 
``$47,000,000''.

SEC. 361. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 102(ff) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4810) is amended by striking ``take such measures as are 
technologically feasible'' and inserting ``implement Plan C/G, as 
defined in the Evaluation Report of the District Engineer dated 
December 1996,''.

SEC. 362. MOOREFIELD, WEST VIRGINIA.

    Effective October 1, 1999, the project for flood control, 
Moorefield, West Virginia, authorized by section 101(a)(25) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4610), is modified 
to provide that the non-Federal interest shall not be required to pay 
the unpaid balance, including interest, of the non-Federal share of the 
cost of the project.

SEC. 363. WEST VIRGINIA AND PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD CONTROL.

    Section 581 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3790) is amended by striking subsection (a) and inserting the 
following:
    ``(a) In General.--The Secretary may design and construct--
        ``(1) flood control measures in the Cheat and Tygart River 
    basins, West Virginia, at a level of protection that is sufficient 
    to prevent any future losses to communities in the basins from 
    flooding such as occurred in January 1996, but not less than a 100-
    year level of protection; and
        ``(2) structural and nonstructural flood control, streambank 
    protection, stormwater management, and channel clearing and 
    modification measures in the lower Allegheny, lower Monongahela, 
    West Branch Susquehanna, and Juniata River basins, Pennsylvania, at 
    a level of protection that is sufficient to prevent any future 
    losses to communities in the basins from flooding such as occurred 
    in January 1996, but not less than a 100-year level of flood 
    protection with respect to measures that incorporate levees or 
    floodwalls.''.

SEC. 364. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATIONS.

    Each of the following projects is authorized to be carried out by 
the Secretary, if the Secretary determines that the project is 
technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and economically 
justified, as appropriate:
        (1) Indian river county, florida.--The project for shore 
    protection, Indian River County, Florida, authorized by section 
    501(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
    4134) and deauthorized under section 1001(b)(1) of the Water 
    Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(1)).
        (2) Lido key beach, sarasota, florida.--
            (A) In general.--The project for shore protection, Lido Key 
        Beach, Sarasota, Florida, authorized by section 101 of the 
        River and Harbor Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1819) and deauthorized 
        under section 1001(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)), at a total cost of $5,200,000, with 
        an estimated Federal cost of $3,380,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $1,820,000.
            (B) Periodic nourishment.--The Secretary may carry out 
        periodic nourishment for the project for a 50-year period at an 
        estimated average annual cost of $602,000, with an estimated 
        annual Federal cost of $391,000 and an estimated annual non-
        Federal cost of $211,000.
        (3) Cass river, michigan (vassar).--The project for flood 
    protection, Cass River, Michigan (Vassar), authorized by section 
    203 of the Flood Control Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 311) and 
    deauthorized under section 1001(b)(2) of the Water Resources 
    Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)).
        (4) Saginaw river, michigan (shiawassee flats).--The project 
    for flood control, Saginaw River, Michigan (Shiawassee Flats), 
    authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1958 (72 
    Stat. 311) and deauthorized under section 1001(b)(2) of the Water 
    Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)).
        (5) Park river, grafton, north dakota.--The project for flood 
    control, Park River, Grafton, North Dakota, authorized by section 
    401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
    4121) and deauthorized under section 1001(a) of that Act (33 U.S.C. 
    579a(a)), at a total cost of $28,100,000, with an estimated Federal 
    cost of $18,265,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
    $9,835,000.
        (6) Memphis harbor, memphis, tennessee.--The project for 
    navigation, Memphis Harbor, Memphis, Tennessee, authorized by 
    section 601(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
    Stat. 4145) and deauthorized pursuant to section 1001(a) of that 
    Act (33 U.S.C 579a(a)), is authorized to be carried out by the 
    Secretary.

SEC. 365. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The following projects or portions of projects are 
not authorized after the date of enactment of this Act:
        (1) Bridgeport harbor, connecticut.--The portion of the project 
    for navigation, Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by 
    section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 297), 
    consisting of a 2.4-acre anchorage area, 9 feet deep, and an 
    adjacent 0.6-acre anchorage area, 6 feet deep, located on the west 
    side of Johnsons River.
        (2) Clinton harbor, connecticut.--The portion of the project 
    for navigation, Clinton Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by section 
    2 of the Act of March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 13, chapter 19), and House 
    Document 240, 76th Congress, 1st Session, lying upstream of a line 
    designated by the points N158,592.12, E660,193.92 and N158,444.58, 
    E660,220.95.
        (3) Bass harbor, maine.--The following portions of the project 
    for navigation, Bass Harbor, Maine, authorized on May 7, 1962, 
    under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 
    577):
            (A) Beginning at a bend in the project, N149040.00, 
        E538505.00, thence running easterly about 50.00 feet along the 
        northern limit of the project to a point N149061.55, 
        E538550.11, thence running southerly about 642.08 feet to a 
        point, N148477.64, E538817.18, thence running southwesterly 
        about 156.27 feet to a point on the westerly limit of the 
        project, N148348.50, E538737.02, thence running northerly about 
        149.00 feet along the westerly limit of the project to a bend 
        in the project, N148489.22, E538768.09, thence running 
        northwesterly about 610.39 feet along the westerly limit of the 
        project to the point of origin.
            (B) Beginning at a point on the westerly limit of the 
        project, N148118.55, E538689.05, thence running southeasterly 
        about 91.92 feet to a point, N148041.43, E538739.07, thence 
        running southerly about 65.00 feet to a point, N147977.86, 
        E538725.51, thence running southwesterly about 91.92 feet to a 
        point on the westerly limit of the project, N147927.84, 
        E538648.39, thence running northerly about 195.00 feet along 
        the westerly limit of the project to the point of origin.
        (4) Boothbay harbor, maine.--The project for navigation, 
    Boothbay Harbor, Maine, authorized by the Act of July 25, 1912 (37 
    Stat. 201, chapter 253).
        (5) Bucksport harbor, maine.--The portion of the project for 
    navigation, Bucksport Harbor, Maine, authorized by the first 
    section of the Act of June 13, 1902 (32 Stat. 331, chapter 1079), 
    consisting of a 16-foot deep channel beginning at a point 
    N268.748.16, E423.390.76, thence running north 47 degrees 02 
    minutes 23 seconds east 51.76 feet to a point N268.783.44, 
    E423.428.64, thence running north 67 degrees 54 minutes 32 seconds 
    west 1513.94 feet to a point N269.352.81, E422.025.84, thence 
    running south 47 degrees 02 minutes 23 seconds west 126.15 feet to 
    a point N269.266.84, E421.933.52, thence running south 70 degrees 
    24 minutes 28 seconds east 1546.79 feet to the point of origin.
        (6) Carvers harbor, vinalhaven, maine.--The portion of the 
    project for navigation, Carvers Harbor, Vinalhaven, Maine, 
    authorized by the Act of June 3, 1896 (commonly known as the 
    ``River and Harbor Appropriations Act of 1896'') (29 Stat. 202, 
    chapter 314), consisting of the 16-foot anchorage beginning at a 
    point with coordinates N137,502.04, E895,156.83, thence running 
    south 6 degrees 34 minutes 57.6 seconds west 277.660 feet to a 
    point N137,226.21, E895,125.00, thence running north 53 degrees, 5 
    minutes 42.4 seconds west 127.746 feet to a point N137,302.92, 
    E895022.85, thence running north 33 degrees 56 minutes 9.8 seconds 
    east 239.999 feet to the point of origin.
        (7) East boothbay harbor, maine.--Section 364 of the Water 
    Resources Development Act of 1996 is amended by striking paragraph 
    (9) (110 Stat. 3734) and inserting the following:
        ``(9) East boothbay harbor, maine.--The project for navigation, 
    East Boothbay Harbor, Maine, authorized by the first section of the 
    Act entitled `An Act making appropriations for the construction, 
    repair, and preservation of certain public works on rivers and 
    harbors, and for other purposes', approved June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 
    631, chapter 382).''.
        (8) Searsport harbor, searsport, maine.--The portion of the 
    project for navigation, Searsport Harbor, Searsport, Maine, 
    authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 (76 
    Stat. 1173), consisting of the 35-foot turning basin beginning at a 
    point with coordinates N225,008.38, E395,464.26, thence running 
    north 43 degrees 49 minutes 53.4 seconds east 362.001 feet to a 
    point N225,269.52, E395,714.96, thence running south 71 degrees 27 
    minutes 33.0 seconds east 1,309.201 feet to a point N224,853.22, 
    E396,956.21, thence running north 84 degrees 3 minutes 45.7 seconds 
    west 1,499.997 feet to the point of origin.
        (9) Wells harbor, maine.--The following portions of the project 
    for navigation, Wells Harbor, Maine, authorized by section 101 of 
    the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 480):
            (A) The portion of the 6-foot channel the boundaries of 
        which begin at a point with coordinates N177,992.00, 
        E394,831.00, thence running south 83 degrees 58 minutes 14.8 
        seconds west 10.38 feet to a point N177,990.91, E394,820.68, 
        thence running south 11 degrees 46 minutes 47.7 seconds west 
        991.76 feet to a point N177,020.04, E394,618.21, thence running 
        south 78 degrees 13 minutes 45.7 seconds east 10.00 feet to a 
        point N177,018.00, E394,628.00, thence running north 11 degrees 
        46 minutes 22.8 seconds east 994.93 feet to the point of 
        origin.
            (B) The portion of the 6-foot anchorage the boundaries of 
        which begin at a point with coordinates N177,778.07, 
        E394,336.96, thence running south 51 degrees 58 minutes 32.7 
        seconds west 15.49 feet to a point N177,768.53, E394,324.76, 
        thence running south 11 degrees 46 minutes 26.5 seconds west 
        672.87 feet to a point N177,109.82, E394,187.46, thence running 
        south 78 degrees 13 minutes 45.7 seconds east 10.00 feet to a 
        point N177,107.78, E394,197.25, thence running north 11 degrees 
        46 minutes 25.4 seconds east 684.70 feet to the point of 
        origin.
            (C) The portion of the 10-foot settling basin the 
        boundaries of which begin at a point with coordinates 
        N177,107.78, E394,197.25, thence running north 78 degrees 13 
        minutes 45.7 seconds west 10.00 feet to a point N177,109.82, 
        E394,187.46, thence running south 11 degrees 46 minutes 15.7 
        seconds west 300.00 feet to a point N176,816.13, E394,126.26, 
        thence running south 78 degrees 12 minutes 21.4 seconds east 
        9.98 feet to a point N176,814.09, E394,136.03, thence running 
        north 11 degrees 46 minutes 29.1 seconds east 300.00 feet to 
        the point of origin.
            (D) The portion of the 10-foot settling basin the 
        boundaries of which begin at a point with coordinates 
        N177,018.00, E394,628.00, thence running north 78 degrees 13 
        minutes 45.7 seconds west 10.00 feet to a point N177,020.04, 
        E394,618.21, thence running south 11 degrees 46 minutes 44.0 
        seconds west 300.00 feet to a point N176,726.36, E394,556.97, 
        thence running south 78 degrees 12 minutes 30.3 seconds east 
        10.03 feet to a point N176,724.31, E394,566.79, thence running 
        north 11 degrees 46 minutes 22.4 seconds east 300.00 feet to 
        the point of origin.
        (10) Falmouth harbor, massachusetts.--The portion of the 
    project for navigation, Falmouth Harbor, Massachusetts, authorized 
    by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1948 (62 Stat. 1172) 
    lying southeasterly of a line commencing at a point N199,286.41, 
    E844,394.91, thence running north 66 degrees 52 minutes 3.31 
    seconds east 472.95 feet to a point N199,472.21, E844,829.83, 
    thence running north 43 degrees 9 minutes 28.3 seconds east 262.64 
    feet to a point N199,633.80, E845,009.48, thence running north 21 
    degrees 40 minutes 11.26 seconds east 808.38 feet to a point 
    N200,415.05, E845,307.98, thence running north 32 degrees 25 
    minutes 29.01 seconds east 160.76 feet to a point N200,550.75, 
    E845,394.18, thence running north 24 degrees 56 minutes 42.29 
    seconds east 1,410.29 feet to a point N201,829.48, E845,988.97.
        (11) Green harbor, massachusetts.--The portion of the project 
    for navigation, Green Harbor, Massachusetts, undertaken pursuant to 
    section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), 
    consisting of the 6-foot deep channel beginning at a point along 
    the west limit of the existing project, north 395990.43, east 
    831079.16, thence running northwesterly about 752.85 feet to a 
    point, north 396722.80, east 830904.76, thence running 
    northwesterly about 222.79 feet to a point along the west limit of 
    the existing project, north 396844.34, east 830718.04, thence 
    running southwesterly about 33.72 feet along the west limit of the 
    existing project to a point, north 396810.80, east 830714.57, 
    thence running southeasterly about 195.42 feet along the west limit 
    of the existing project to a point, north 396704.19, east 
    830878.35, thence running about 544.66 feet along the west limit of 
    the existing project to a point, north 396174.35, east 831004.52, 
    thence running southeasterly about 198.49 feet along the west limit 
    of the existing project to the point of beginning.
        (12) New bedford and fairhaven harbor, massachusetts.--The 
    following portions of the project for navigation, New Bedford and 
    Fairhaven Harbor, Massachusetts:
            (A) A portion of the 25-foot spur channel leading to the 
        west of Fish Island, authorized by section 3 of the Act of 
        March 3, 1909 (35 Stat. 816, chapter 264), beginning at a point 
        with coordinates N232,173.77, E758,791.32, thence running south 
        27 degrees 36 minutes 52.8 seconds west 38.2 feet to a point 
        N232,139.91, E758,773.61, thence running south 87 degrees 35 
        minutes 31.6 seconds west 196.84 feet to a point N232,131.64, 
        E758,576.94, thence running north 47 degrees 47 minutes 48.4 
        seconds west 502.72 feet to a point N232,469.35, E758,204.54, 
        thence running north 10 degrees 10 minutes 20.3 seconds west 
        438.88 feet to a point N232,901.33, E758,127.03, thence running 
        north 79 degrees 49 minutes 43.1 seconds east 121.69 feet to a 
        point N232,922.82, E758,246.81, thence running south 04 degrees 
        29 minutes 17.6 seconds east 52.52 feet to a point N232,870.46, 
        E758,250.92, thence running south 23 degrees 56 minutes 11.2 
        seconds east 49.15 feet to a point N323,825.54, E758,270.86, 
        thence running south 79 degrees 49 minutes 27.0 seconds west 
        88.19 feet to a point N232,809.96, E758,184.06, thence running 
        south 10 degrees 10 minutes 25.7 seconds east 314.83 feet to a 
        point N232,500.08, E758,239.67, thence running south 56 degrees 
        33 minutes 56.1 seconds east 583.07 feet to a point 
        N232,178.82, E758,726.25, thence running south 85 degrees 33 
        minutes 16.0 seconds east to the point of origin.
            (B) A portion of the 30-foot west maneuvering basin, 
        authorized by the first section of the Act of July 3, 1930 (46 
        Stat. 918, chapter 847), beginning at a point with coordinates 
        N232,139.91, E758,773.61, thence running north 81 degrees 49 
        minutes 30.1 seconds east 160.76 feet to a point N232,162.77, 
        E758.932.74, thence running north 85 degrees 33 minutes 16.0 
        seconds west 141.85 feet to a point N232,173.77, E758,791.32, 
        thence running south 27 degrees 36 minutes 52.8 seconds west to 
        the point of origin.
    (b) Anchorage Area, Clinton Harbor, Connecticut.--The portion of 
the Clinton Harbor, Connecticut, navigation project referred to in 
subsection (a)(2) beginning at a point with coordinates N158,444.58, 
E660,220.95, thence running north 79 degrees 37 minutes 14 seconds east 
833.31 feet to a point N158,594.72, E661,040.67, thence running south 
80 degrees 51 minutes 53 seconds east 181.21 feet to a point 
N158,565.95, E661,219.58, thence running north 57 degrees 38 minutes 04 
seconds west 126.02 feet to a point N158,633.41, E660,113.14, thence 
running south 79 degrees 37 minutes 14 seconds west 911.61 feet to a 
point N158,469.17, E660,216.44, thence running south 10 degrees 22 
minutes 46 seconds east 25 feet returning to a point N158,444.58, 
E660,220.95, is redesignated as an anchorage area.
    (c) Wells Harbor, Maine.--
        (1) Project modification.--The Wells Harbor, Maine, navigation 
    project referred to in subsection (a)(9) is modified to authorize 
    the Secretary to realign the channel and anchorage areas based on a 
    harbor design capacity of 150 craft.
        (2) Redesignations.--
            (A) 6-foot anchorage.--The following portions of the Wells 
        Harbor, Maine, navigation project referred to in subsection 
        (a)(9) shall be redesignated as part of the 6-foot anchorage:
                (i) The portion of the 6-foot channel the boundaries of 
            which begin at a point with coordinates N177,990.91, 
            E394,820.68, thence running south 83 degrees 58 minutes 
            40.8 seconds west 94.65 feet to a point N177,980.98, 
            E394,726.55, thence running south 11 degrees 46 minutes 
            22.4 seconds west 962.83 feet to a point N177,038.40, 
            E394,530.10, thence running south 78 degrees 13 minutes 
            45.7 seconds east 90.00 feet to a point N177,020.04, 
            E394,618.21, thence running north 11 degrees 46 minutes 
            47.7 seconds east 991.76 feet to the point of origin.
                (ii) The portion of the 10-foot inner harbor settling 
            basin the boundaries of which begin at a point with 
            coordinates N177,020.04, E394,618.21, thence running north 
            78 degrees 13 minutes 30.5 seconds west 160.00 feet to a 
            point N177,052.69, E394,461.58, thence running south 11 
            degrees 46 minutes 45.4 seconds west 299.99 feet to a point 
            N176,759.02, E394,400.34, thence running south 78 degrees 
            13 minutes 17.9 seconds east 160 feet to a point 
            N176,726.36, E394,556.97, thence running north 11 degrees 
            46 minutes 44.0 seconds east 300.00 feet to the point of 
            origin.
            (B) 6-foot channel.--The following portion of the Wells 
        Harbor, Maine, navigation project referred to in subsection 
        (a)(9) shall be redesignated as part of the 6-foot channel: the 
        portion of the 6-foot anchorage the boundaries of which begin 
        at a point with coordinates N178,102.26, E394,751.83, thence 
        running south 51 degrees 59 minutes 42.1 seconds west 526.51 
        feet to a point N177,778.07, E394,336.96, thence running south 
        11 degrees 46 minutes 26.6 seconds west 511.83 feet to a point 
        N177,277.01, E394,232.52, thence running south 78 degrees 13 
        minutes 17.9 seconds east 80.00 feet to a point N177,260.68, 
        E394,310.84, thence running north 11 degrees 46 minutes 24.8 
        seconds east 482.54 feet to a point N177,733.07, E394,409.30, 
        thence running north 51 degrees 59 minutes 41.0 seconds east 
        402.63 feet to a point N177,980.98, E394,726.55, thence running 
        north 11 degrees 46 minutes 27.6 seconds east 123.89 feet to 
        the point of origin.
        (3) Realignment.--The 6-foot anchorage area described in 
    paragraph (2)(B) shall be realigned to include the area located 
    south of the inner harbor settling basin in existence on the date 
    of enactment of this Act beginning at a point with coordinates 
    N176,726.36, E394,556.97, thence running north 78 degrees 13 
    minutes 17.9 seconds west 160.00 feet to a point N176,759.02, 
    E394,400.34, thence running south 11 degrees 47 minutes 03.8 
    seconds west 45 feet to a point N176,714.97, E394,391.15, thence 
    running south 78 degrees 13 minutes 17.9 seconds 160.00 feet to a 
    point N176,682.31, E394,547.78, thence running north 11 degrees 47 
    minutes 03.8 seconds east 45 feet to the point of origin.
        (4) Relocation.--The Secretary may relocate the settling basin 
    feature of the Wells Harbor, Maine, navigation project referred to 
    in subsection (a)(9) to the outer harbor between the jetties.
        (5) Additional actions.--In carrying out the operation and the 
    maintenance of the Wells Harbor, Maine, navigation project referred 
    to in subsection (a)(9), the Secretary shall undertake each of the 
    actions of the Corps of Engineers specified in section IV(B) of the 
    memorandum of agreement relating to the project dated January 20, 
    1998, including the actions specified in section IV(B) that the 
    parties agreed to ask the Corps of Engineers to undertake.
        (6) Conservation easement.--The Secretary of the Interior, 
    acting through the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife 
    Service, may accept a conveyance of the right, but not the 
    obligation, to enforce a conservation easement to be held by the 
    State of Maine over certain land owned by the town of Wells, Maine, 
    that is adjacent to the Rachel Carson National Wildlife Refuge.
    (d) Anchorage Area, Green Harbor, Massachusetts.--The portion of 
the Green Harbor, Massachusetts, navigation project referred to in 
subsection (a)(11) consisting of a 6-foot deep channel that lies 
northerly of a line the coordinates of which are North 394825.00, East 
831660.00 and North 394779.28, East 831570.64 is redesignated as an 
anchorage area.

SEC. 366. AMERICAN AND SACRAMENTO RIVERS, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood damage reduction, American 
and Sacramento Rivers, California, authorized by section 101(a)(1) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3662-3663), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to include the following improvements 
as part of the overall project:
        (1) Raising the left bank of the non-Federal levee upstream of 
    the Mayhew Drain for a distance of 4,500 feet by an average of 2.5 
    feet.
        (2) Raising the right bank of the American River levee from 
    1,500 feet upstream to 4,000 feet downstream of the Howe Avenue 
    bridge by an average of 1 foot.
        (3) Modifying the south levee of the Natomas Cross Canal for a 
    distance of 5 miles to ensure that the south levee is consistent 
    with the level of protection provided by the authorized levee along 
    the east bank of the Sacramento River.
        (4) Modifying the north levee of the Natomas Cross Canal for a 
    distance of 5 miles to ensure that the height of the levee is 
    equivalent to the height of the south levee as authorized by 
    paragraph (3).
        (5) Installing gates to the existing Mayhew Drain culvert and 
    pumps to prevent backup of floodwater on the Folsom Boulevard side 
    of the gates.
        (6) Installing a slurry wall in the north levee of the American 
    River from the east levee of the Natomas east Main Drain upstream 
    for a distance of approximately 1.2 miles.
        (7) Installing a slurry wall in the north levee of the American 
    River from 300 feet west of Jacob Lane north for a distance of 
    approximately 1 mile to the end of the existing levee.
    (b) Cost Limitations.--Section 101(a)(1)(A) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3662) is amended by striking ``at a 
total cost of'' and all that follows through ``$14,225,000,'' and 
inserting the following: ``at a total cost of $91,900,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $68,925,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $22,975,000,''.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--For the purposes of section 103 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213), the modifications 
authorized by this section shall be subject to the same cost sharing in 
effect for the project for flood damage reduction, American and 
Sacramento Rivers, California, authorized by section 101(a)(1) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3662).

SEC. 367. MARTIN, KENTUCKY.

    The project for flood control, Martin, Kentucky, authorized by 
section 202(a) of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 
1981 (94 Stat. 1339), is modified to authorize the Secretary to take 
all necessary measures to prevent future losses that would occur as a 
result of a flood equal in magnitude to a 100-year frequency event.

SEC. 368. SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA PILOT PROGRAM.

    Section 340(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4856) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out the pilot program under this section 
$40,000,000 for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1992. Such 
sums shall remain available until expended.''.
    SEC. 369. BLACK WARRIOR AND TOMBIGBEE RIVERS, JACKSON, ALABAMA.
    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Black Warrior and 
Tombigbee Rivers, vicinity of Jackson, Alabama, authorized by section 
106 of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1987 (100 
Stat. 3341-199), is modified to authorize the Secretary to acquire land 
for mitigation of the habitat losses attributable to the project, 
including the navigation channel, dredged material disposal areas, and 
other areas directly affected by construction of the project.
    (b) Construction Before Acquisition of Mitigation Land.--
Notwithstanding section 906 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283), the Secretary may construct the project before 
acquisition of the mitigation land if the Secretary takes such actions 
as are necessary to ensure that any required mitigation land will be 
acquired not later than 2 years after initiation of construction of the 
new channel and that the acquisition will fully mitigate any adverse 
environmental impacts resulting from the project.

SEC. 370. TROPICANA WASH AND FLAMINGO WASH, NEVADA.

    Any Federal costs associated with the Tropicana Wash and Flamingo 
Wash, Nevada, authorized by section 101(13) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4803), incurred by the non-Federal 
interest to accelerate or modify construction of the project, in 
cooperation with the Corps of Engineers, shall be eligible for 
reimbursement by the Secretary.

SEC. 371. COMITE RIVER, LOUISIANA.

    The Comite River Diversion Project for flood control, authorized as 
part of the project for flood control, Amite River and Tributaries, 
Louisiana, by section 101(11) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1992 (106 Stat. 4802) and modified by section 301(b)(5) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3709), is further modified 
to authorize the Secretary to include the costs of highway relocations 
to be cost shared as a project construction feature.

SEC. 372. ST. MARYS RIVER, MICHIGAN.

    The project for navigation, St. Marys River, Michigan, is modified 
to direct the Secretary to provide an additional foot of overdraft 
between Point Louise Turn and the Locks, Sault Sainte Marie, Michigan, 
consistent with the channels upstream of Point Louise Turn. The 
modification shall be carried out as operation and maintenance to 
improve navigation safety.

SEC. 373. CHARLEVOIX, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary shall review and, if consistent with authorized 
project purposes, reimburse the city of Charlevoix, Michigan, for the 
Federal share of costs associated with construction of the new 
revetment connection to the Federal navigation project at Charlevoix 
Harbor, Michigan.

SEC. 374. WHITE RIVER BASIN, ARKANSAS AND MISSOURI.

    (a) In General.--Subject to subsection (b), the project for flood 
control, power generation, and other purposes at the White River Basin, 
Arkansas and Missouri, authorized by section 4 of the Act of June 28, 
1938 (52 Stat. 1218, chapter 795), and modified by House Document 917, 
76th Congress, 3d Session, and House Document 290, 77th Congress, 1st 
Session, approved August 18, 1941, and House Document 499, 83d 
Congress, 2d Session, approved September 3, 1954, and by section 304 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3711) is further 
modified to authorize the Secretary to provide minimum flows necessary 
to sustain tail water trout fisheries by reallocating the following 
amounts of project storage: Beaver Lake, 1.5 feet; Table Rock, 2 feet; 
Bull Shoals Lake, 5 feet; Norfork Lake, 3.5 feet; and Greers Ferry 
Lake, 3 feet.
    (b) Report.--
        (1) In general.--No funds may be obligated to carry out work on 
    the modification under subsection (a) until completion of a final 
    report by the Chief of Engineers finding that the work is 
    technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and economically 
    justified.
        (2) Timing.--The Secretary shall submit the report to Congress 
    not later than July 30, 2000.
        (3) Contents.--The report shall include determinations 
    concerning whether--
            (A) the modification under subsection (a) adversely affects 
        other authorized project purposes; and
            (B) Federal costs will be incurred in connection with the 
        modification.
    SEC. 375. WAURIKA LAKE, OKLAHOMA, WATER CONVEYANCE FACILITIES.
    For the project for construction of the water conveyances 
authorized by the first section of Public Law 88-253 (77 Stat. 841), 
the requirements for the Waurika Project Master Conservancy District to 
repay the $2,900,000 in costs (including interest) resulting from the 
October 1991 settlement of the claim before the United States Claims 
Court, and to make a payment of $595,000 of the final cost representing 
a portion of the difference between the 1978 estimate of cost and the 
actual cost determined after completion of the project in 1991, are 
waived.

                           TITLE IV--STUDIES

SEC. 401. DEEP DRAFT HARBOR COST SHARING.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall undertake a study of non-
Federal cost-sharing requirements for the construction and operation 
and maintenance of deep draft harbor projects to determine whether--
        (1) cost sharing adversely affects United States port 
    development or domestic and international trade; and
        (2) any revision of the cost-sharing requirements would benefit 
    United States domestic and international trade.
    (b) Recommendations.--
        (1) In general.--Not later than May 30, 2001, the Secretary 
    shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of 
    the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
    of the House of Representatives any recommendations that the 
    Secretary may have in light of the study under subsection (a).
        (2) Considerations.--In making recommendations, the Secretary 
    shall consider--
            (A) the potential economic, environmental, and budgetary 
        impacts of any proposed revision of the cost-sharing 
        requirements; and
            (B) the effect that any such revision would have on 
        regional port competition.

SEC. 402. BOYDSVILLE, ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
the reservoir and associated improvements to provide for flood control, 
recreation, water quality, and fish and wildlife purposes in the 
vicinity of Boydsville, Arkansas.

SEC. 403. GREERS FERRY LAKE, ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
constructing water intake facilities at Greers Ferry Lake, Arkansas.

SEC. 404. DEL NORTE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
designating a permanent disposal site for dredged material from Federal 
navigation projects in Del Norte County, California.

SEC. 405. FRAZIER CREEK, TULARE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine--
        (1) the feasibility of restoring Frazier Creek, Tulare County, 
    California; and
        (2) the Federal interest in flood control, environmental 
    restoration, conservation of fish and wildlife resources, 
    recreation, and water quality of the creek.

SEC. 406. MARE ISLAND STRAIT, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a general reevaluation 
to determine the Federal interest in reconfiguring the Mare Island 
Strait channel.
    (b) Considerations.--In determining the Federal interest, the 
Secretary shall consider the benefits of economic activity associated 
with potential future uses of the channel and any other benefits that 
could be realized by increasing the width and depth of the channel to 
accommodate both current and potential future uses of the channel.

SEC. 407. STRAWBERRY CREEK, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine--
        (1) the feasibility of restoring Strawberry Creek, Berkeley, 
    California; and
        (2) the Federal interest in environmental restoration, 
    conservation of fish and wildlife resources, recreation, and water 
    quality of the creek.

SEC. 408. SWEETWATER RESERVOIR, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the potential water quality 
problems and pollution abatement measures in the watershed in and 
around Sweetwater Reservoir, San Diego County, California.

SEC. 409. WHITEWATER RIVER BASIN, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall complete a study to determine the feasibility 
of a flood damage reduction project in the Whitewater River basin (also 
known as ``Thousand Palms''), California.

SEC. 410. DESTIN-NORIEGA POINT, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility 
of--
        (1) restoring Noriega Point, Florida, to serve as a breakwater 
    for Destin Harbor; and
        (2) including Noriega Point as part of the East Pass, Florida, 
    navigation project.

SEC. 411. LITTLE ECONLACKHATCHEE RIVER BASIN, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of pollution abatement measures 
in the Little Econlackhatchee River basin, Florida.

SEC. 412. PORT EVERGLADES, BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
constructing a sand bypassing project at the Port Everglades Inlet, 
Florida.
    SEC. 413. LAKE ALLATOONA, ETOWAH RIVER, AND LITTLE RIVER WATERSHED, 
      GEORGIA.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the 
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, may carry out the 
following water-related environmental restoration and resource 
protection investigations into restoring Lake Allatoona, the Etowah 
River, and the Little River watershed, Georgia:
        (1) Lake allatoona/etowah river shoreline restoration 
    investigation.--Feasibility phase investigation to identify and 
    recommend to Congress structural and nonstructural measures to 
    alleviate shore erosion and sedimentation problems along the shores 
    of Lake Allatoona and the Etowah River.
        (2) Little river environmental restoration investigation.--
    Feasibility phase investigation to evaluate environmental problems 
    and recommend environmental restoration measures (including 
    appropriate environmental structural and nonstructural measures) 
    for the Little River watershed, Georgia.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated for the period beginning with fiscal year 2000--
        (1) $850,000 to carry out subsection (a)(1); and
        (2) $500,000 to carry out subsection (a)(2).

SEC. 414. BOISE, IDAHO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
undertaking flood control on the Boise River in Boise, Idaho.

SEC. 415. GOOSE CREEK WATERSHED, OAKLEY, IDAHO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
undertaking flood damage reduction, water conservation, ground water 
recharge, ecosystem restoration, and related activities along the Goose 
Creek watershed near Oakley, Idaho.

SEC. 416. LITTLE WOOD RIVER, GOODING, IDAHO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
restoring and repairing the Lava Rock Little Wood River Containment 
System to prevent flooding in the city of Gooding, Idaho.

SEC. 417. SNAKE RIVER, LEWISTON, IDAHO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
undertaking bank stabilization and flood control on the Snake River at 
Lewiston, Idaho.

SEC. 418. SNAKE RIVER AND PAYETTE RIVER, IDAHO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
undertaking a flood control project along the Snake River and Payette 
River, in the vicinity of Payette, Idaho.
    SEC. 419. UPPER DES PLAINES RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, ILLINOIS AND 
      WISCONSIN.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the upper 
Des Plaines River and tributaries, Illinois and Wisconsin, upstream of 
the confluence with Salt Creek at Riverside, Illinois, to determine the 
feasibility of improvements in the interests of flood damage reduction, 
environmental restoration and protection, water quality, recreation, 
and related purposes.
    (b) Special Rule.--In conducting the study, the Secretary may not 
exclude from consideration and evaluation flood damage reduction 
measures based on restrictive policies regarding the frequency of 
flooding, the drainage area, and the amount of runoff.
    (c) Consultation and Use of Existing Data.--In carrying out this 
section, the Secretary shall--
        (1) consult with appropriate Federal and State agencies; and
        (2) make maximum use of data in existence on the date of 
    enactment of this Act and ongoing programs and efforts of Federal 
    agencies and States.

SEC. 420. CAMERON PARISH WEST OF CALCASIEU RIVER, LOUISIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
undertaking a storm damage reduction and ecosystem restoration project 
for Cameron Parish west of Calcasieu River, Louisiana.

SEC. 421. COASTAL LOUISIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
using dredged material from maintenance activities at Federal 
navigation projects in coastal Louisiana to benefit coastal areas in 
the State.

SEC. 422. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LOUISIANA.

    In carrying out a study of the storm damage reduction benefits to 
Grand Isle and vicinity, Louisiana, the Secretary shall include 
benefits that a storm damage reduction project for Grand Isle and 
vicinity, Louisiana, may have on the mainland coast of Louisiana as 
project benefits attributable to the Grand Isle project.
    SEC. 423. GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY ECOSYSTEM, CHEF MENTEUR TO 
      SABINE RIVER, LOUISIANA.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of undertaking ecosystem restoration and protection 
measures along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway from Chef Menteur to 
Sabine River, Louisiana.
    (b) Matters To Be Addressed.--The study shall address saltwater 
intrusion, tidal scour, erosion, compaction, subsidence, wind and wave 
action, bank failure, and other problems relating to ecosystem 
restoration and protection.

SEC. 424. MUDDY RIVER, BROOKLINE AND BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall evaluate the January 1999 
study commissioned by the Boston Parks and Recreation Department, 
Boston, Massachusetts, and entitled ``The Emerald Necklace 
Environmental Improvement Master Plan, Phase I Muddy River Flood 
Control, Water Quality and Habitat Enhancement'', to determine whether 
the plans outlined in the study for flood control, water quality, 
habitat enhancements, and other improvements to the Muddy River in 
Brookline and Boston, Massachusetts, are cost-effective, technically 
sound, environmentally acceptable, and in the Federal interest.
    (b) Report.--Not later than June 30, 2000, the Secretary shall 
submit to Congress a report on the results of the evaluation.

SEC. 425. WESTPORT, MASSACHUSETTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of undertaking a navigation project for the town of 
Westport, Massachusetts.
    (b) Considerations.--In determining the benefits of the project, 
the Secretary shall include the benefits derived from using dredged 
material for shore protection and storm damage reduction.

SEC. 426. ST. CLAIR RIVER AND LAKE ST. CLAIR, MICHIGAN.

    (a) Plan.--The Secretary, in coordination with State and local 
governments and appropriate Federal and provincial authorities of 
Canada, shall develop a comprehensive management plan for St. Clair 
River and Lake St. Clair.
    (b) Elements.--The plan shall include the following elements:
        (1) Identification of the causes and sources of environmental 
    degradation.
        (2) Continuous monitoring of organic, biological, metallic, and 
    chemical contamination levels.
        (3) Timely dissemination of information of contamination levels 
    to public authorities, other interested parties, and the public.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report that includes 
the plan developed under subsection (a) and recommendations for 
potential restoration measures.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $400,000.

SEC. 427. ST. CLAIR SHORES, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
constructing a flood control project at St. Clair Shores, Michigan.
    SEC. 428. WOODTICK PENINSULA, MICHIGAN, AND TOLEDO HARBOR, OHIO.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
using dredged material from Toledo Harbor, Ohio, to provide erosion 
reduction, navigation, and ecosystem restoration at Woodtick Peninsula, 
Michigan.

SEC. 429. PASCAGOULA HARBOR, MISSISSIPPI.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
an alternative plan for dredged material management for the Pascagoula 
River portion of the project for navigation, Pascagoula Harbor, 
Mississippi, authorized by section 202(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4094).
    (b) Contents.--The study under subsection (a) shall--
        (1) include an analysis of the feasibility of expanding the 
    Singing River Island Disposal Area or constructing a new dredged 
    material disposal facility; and
        (2) identify methods of managing and reducing sediment 
    transport into the Federal navigation channel.

SEC. 430. TUNICA LAKE WEIR, MISSISSIPPI.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of constructing an outlet weir at Tunica Lake, Tunica 
County, Mississippi, and Lee County, Arkansas, for the purpose of 
stabilizing water levels in the lake.
    (b) Economic Analysis.--In carrying out the study, the Secretary 
shall include as part of the economic analysis the benefits derived 
from recreation uses at Tunica Lake and economic benefits associated 
with restoration of fish and wildlife habitat.

SEC. 431. YELLOWSTONE RIVER, MONTANA.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive study of 
the Yellowstone River from Gardiner, Montana, to the confluence of the 
Missouri River to determine the hydrologic, biological, and 
socioeconomic cumulative impacts on the river.
    (b) Consultation and Coordination.--The Secretary shall conduct the 
study in consultation with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 
the United States Geological Survey, and the Natural Resources 
Conservation Service and with the full participation of the State of 
Montana and tribal and local entities, and provide for public 
participation.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 5 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the 
results of the study.

SEC. 432. LAS VEGAS VALLEY, NEVADA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive study 
of water resources in the Las Vegas Valley, Nevada.
    (b) Objectives.--The study shall identify problems and 
opportunities related to ecosystem restoration, water quality 
(particularly the quality of surface runoff), and flood control.

SEC. 433. SOUTHWEST VALLEY, ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
undertaking a project for flood damage reduction in the Southwest 
Valley, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

SEC. 434. CAYUGA CREEK, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
undertaking a project for flood control for Cayuga Creek, New York.

SEC. 435. LAKE CHAMPLAIN, NEW YORK AND VERMONT.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
restoring Lake Champlain, New York and Vermont, to improve water 
quality, fish and wildlife habitat, and navigation.

SEC. 436. OSWEGO RIVER BASIN, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
establishing a flood forecasting system in the Oswego River basin, New 
York.

SEC. 437. WHITE OAK RIVER, NORTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine whether there is a 
Federal interest in a project for water quality, environmental 
restoration and protection, and related purposes on the White Oak 
River, North Carolina.

SEC. 438. ARCOLA CREEK WATERSHED, MADISON, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
undertaking a project to provide environmental restoration and 
protection for the Arcola Creek watershed, Madison, Ohio.

SEC. 439. CLEVELAND HARBOR, CLEVELAND, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
undertaking repairs and related navigation improvements at Dike 14, 
Cleveland, Ohio.

SEC. 440. TOUSSAINT RIVER, CARROLL TOWNSHIP, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
undertaking navigation improvements on the Toussaint River, Carroll 
Township, Ohio.

SEC. 441. WESTERN LAKE ERIE BASIN, OHIO, INDIANA, AND MICHIGAN.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to develop 
measures to improve flood control, navigation, water quality, 
recreation, and fish and wildlife habitat in a comprehensive manner in 
the western Lake Erie basin, Ohio, Indiana, and Michigan, including 
watersheds of the Maumee, Ottawa, and Portage Rivers.
    (b) Cooperation.--In carrying out the study, the Secretary shall--
        (1) cooperate with interested Federal, State, and local 
    agencies and nongovernmental organizations; and
        (2) consider all relevant programs of the agencies.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the 
results of the study, including findings and recommendations.

SEC. 442. SCHUYLKILL RIVER, NORRISTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
undertaking a project for flood control for the Schuylkill River, 
Norristown, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 443. SOUTH CAROLINA COASTAL AREAS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall review pertinent reports and 
conduct other studies and field investigations to determine the best 
available science and methods for management of contaminated dredged 
material and sediments in the coastal areas of South Carolina.
    (b) Focus.--In carrying out subsection (a), the Secretary shall 
place particular focus on areas where the Corps of Engineers maintains 
deep draft navigation projects, such as Charleston Harbor, Georgetown 
Harbor, and Port Royal, South Carolina.
    (c) Cooperation.--The studies shall be conducted in cooperation 
with the appropriate Federal and State environmental agencies.

SEC. 444. SANTEE DELTA FOCUS AREA, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary shall complete a comprehensive study of the ecosystem in 
the Santee Delta focus area, South Carolina, to determine the 
feasibility of undertaking a project to enhance wetland habitat and 
public recreational opportunities in the area.

SEC. 445. WACCAMAW RIVER, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
undertaking a flood control project for the Waccamaw River in Horry 
County, South Carolina.

SEC. 446. DAY COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA.

    The Secretary shall conduct--
        (1) an investigation of flooding and other water resources 
    problems between the James River and Big Sioux watersheds, South 
    Dakota; and
        (2) an assessment of flood damage reduction needs of the area.

SEC. 447. NIOBRARA RIVER AND MISSOURI RIVER, SOUTH DAKOTA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the Niobrara River watershed 
and the operations of Fort Randall Dam and Gavins Point Dam on the 
Missouri River, South Dakota, to determine the feasibility of 
alleviating the bank erosion, sedimentation, and related problems in 
the lower Niobrara River and the Missouri River below Fort Randall Dam.

SEC. 448. CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall include, as part of the study authorized by a 
resolution of the Committee on Public Works and Transportation of the 
House of Representatives dated August 1, 1990, a review of two 175-
foot-wide barge shelves on either side of the navigation channel at the 
Port of Corpus Christi, Texas.

SEC. 449. MITCHELL'S CUT CHANNEL (CANEY FORK CUT), TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
undertaking a project for navigation, Mitchell's Cut Channel (Caney 
Fork Cut), Texas.

SEC. 450. MOUTH OF COLORADO RIVER, TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
undertaking a project for navigation at the mouth of the Colorado 
River, Texas, to provide a minimum draft navigation channel extending 
from the Colorado River through Parkers Cut (also known as ``Tiger 
Island Cut''), or an acceptable alternative, to Matagorda Bay.

SEC. 451. SANTA CLARA RIVER, UTAH.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of undertaking measures to alleviate damage caused by 
flooding, bank erosion, and sedimentation along the watershed of the 
Santa Clara River, Utah, above the Gunlock Reservoir.
    (b) Contents.--The study shall include an analysis of watershed 
conditions and water quality, as related to flooding and bank erosion, 
along the Santa Clara River in the vicinity of Gunlock, Utah.

SEC. 452. MOUNT ST. HELENS, WASHINGTON.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of undertaking ecosystem restoration improvements 
throughout the Cowlitz and Toutle River basins, Washington, including 
the 6,000 acres of wetland, riverine, riparian, and upland habitats 
lost or altered due to the eruption of Mount St. Helens in 1980 and 
subsequent emergency actions.
    (b) Requirements.--In carrying out the study, the Secretary shall--
        (1) work in close coordination with local governments, 
    watershed entities, the State of Washington, and other Federal 
    agencies; and
        (2) place special emphasis on--
            (A) conservation and restoration strategies to benefit 
        species that are listed or proposed for listing as threatened 
        or endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 
        (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); and
            (B) other watershed restoration objectives.

SEC. 453. KANAWHA RIVER, FAYETTE COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
developing a public port along the Kanawha River in Fayette County, 
West Virginia, at a site known as ``Longacre''.

SEC. 454. WEST VIRGINIA PORTS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
expanding public port development in West Virginia along the Ohio River 
and the navigable portion of the Kanawha River from its mouth to river 
mile 91.0.

SEC. 455. JOHN GLENN GREAT LAKES BASIN PROGRAM.

    (a) Strategic Plans.--
        (1) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive study 
    of the Great Lakes region to ensure the future use, management, and 
    protection of water resources and related resources of the Great 
    Lakes basin.
        (2) Report.--
            (A) In general.--As expeditiously as possible, but not 
        later than 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, and 
        every 2 years thereafter, the Secretary shall submit to the 
        Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
        Works of the Senate a report outlining a strategic plan for 
        Corps of Engineers programs and proposed Corps of Engineers 
        projects in the Great Lakes basin.
            (B) Contents.--The plan shall include--
                (i) details of projects in the Great Lakes region 
            relating to--

                    (I) navigation improvements, maintenance, and 
                operations for commercial and recreational vessels;
                    (II) environmental restoration activities;
                    (III) water level maintenance activities;
                    (IV) technical and planning assistance to States 
                and remedial action planning committees;
                    (V) sediment transport analysis, sediment 
                management planning, and activities to support 
                prevention of excess sediment loadings;
                    (VI) flood damage reduction and shoreline erosion 
                prevention; and
                    (VII) all other relevant activities of the Corps of 
                Engineers; and

                (ii) an analysis of factors limiting use of programs 
            and authorities of the Corps of Engineers in existence on 
            the date of enactment of this Act in the Great Lakes basin, 
            including the need for new or modified authorities.
        (3) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
    appropriated to carry out this section $1,000,000 for the period of 
    fiscal years 2000 through 2003.
    (b) Great Lakes Biohydrological Information.--
        (1) Inventory.--
            (A) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall request each Federal 
        agency that may possess information relevant to the Great Lakes 
        biohydrological system to provide an inventory of all such 
        information in the possession of the agency.
            (B) Relevant information.--For the purpose of subparagraph 
        (A), relevant information includes information on--
                (i) ground and surface water hydrology;
                (ii) natural and altered tributary dynamics;
                (iii) biological aspects of the system influenced by 
            and influencing water quantity and water movement;
                (iv) meteorological projections and the impacts of 
            weather conditions on Great Lakes water levels; and
                (v) other Great Lakes biohydrological system data 
            relevant to sustainable water use management.
        (2) Report.--
            (A) In general.--Not later than 18 months after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in consultation with the 
        States, Indian tribes, and Federal agencies, and after 
        requesting information from the provinces and the federal 
        government of Canada, shall--
                (i) compile the inventories of information;
                (ii) analyze the information for consistency and gaps; 
            and
                (iii) submit to Congress, the International Joint 
            Commission, and the Great Lakes States a report that 
            includes recommendations on ways to improve the information 
            base on the biohydrological dynamics of the Great Lakes 
            ecosystem as a whole, so as to support environmentally 
            sound decisions regarding diversions and consumptive uses 
            of Great Lakes water.
            (B) Recommendations.--The recommendations in the report 
        under subparagraph (A) shall include recommendations relating 
        to the resources and funds necessary for implementing 
        improvement of the information base.
            (C) Considerations.--In developing the report under 
        subparagraph (A), the Secretary, in cooperation with the 
        Secretary of State, the Secretary of Transportation, and the 
        heads of other agencies as appropriate, shall consider and 
        report on the status of the issues described and 
        recommendations made in--
                (i) the Report of the International Joint Commission to 
            the Governments of the United States and Canada under the 
            1977 reference issued in 1985; and
                (ii) the 1993 Report of the International Joint 
            Commission to the Governments of Canada and the United 
            States on Methods of Alleviating Adverse Consequences of 
            Fluctuating Water Levels in the Great Lakes St. Lawrence 
            Basin.
    (c) Great Lakes Recreational Boating.--Not later than 18 months 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary, using 
information and studies in existence on the date of enactment of this 
Act to the extent practicable, and in cooperation with the Great Lakes 
States, shall submit to Congress a report detailing the economic 
benefits of recreational boating in the Great Lakes basin, particularly 
at harbors benefiting from operation and maintenance projects of the 
Corps of Engineers.
    (d) Cooperation.--In undertaking activities under this section, the 
Secretary shall--
        (1) encourage public participation; and
        (2) cooperate, and, as appropriate, collaborate, with Great 
    Lakes States, tribal governments, and Canadian federal, provincial, 
    and tribal governments.
    (e) Water Use Activities and Policies.--The Secretary may provide 
technical assistance to the Great Lakes States to develop interstate 
guidelines to improve the consistency and efficiency of State-level 
water use activities and policies in the Great Lakes basin.
    (f) Cost Sharing.--The Secretary may seek and accept funds from 
non-Federal entities to be used to pay up to 25 percent of the cost of 
carrying out subsections (b), (c), (d), and (e).

SEC. 456. GREAT LAKES NAVIGATIONAL SYSTEM.

    In consultation with the St. Lawrence Seaway Development 
Corporation, the Secretary shall review the Great Lakes Connecting 
Channel and Harbors Report dated March 1985 to determine the 
feasibility of undertaking any modification of the recommendations made 
in the report to improve commercial navigation on the Great Lakes 
navigation system, including locks, dams, harbors, ports, channels, and 
other related features.
    SEC. 457. NUTRIENT LOADING RESULTING FROM DREDGED MATERIAL 
      DISPOSAL.
    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of nutrient loading 
that occurs as a result of discharges of dredged material into open-
water sites in the Chesapeake Bay.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the 
results of the study.
    SEC. 458. UPPER MISSISSIPPI AND ILLINOIS RIVERS LEVEES AND 
      STREAMBANKS PROTECTION.
    The Secretary shall conduct a study of erosion damage to levees and 
other flood control structures on the upper Mississippi and Illinois 
Rivers and the impact of increased barge and pleasure craft traffic on 
deterioration of the levees and other flood control structures.

SEC. 459. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

    (a) Development.--The Secretary shall develop a plan to address 
water resource and related land resource problems and opportunities in 
the upper Mississippi and Illinois River basins, from Cairo, Illinois, 
to the headwaters of the Mississippi River, in the interest of systemic 
flood damage reduction by means of--
        (1) structural and nonstructural flood control and floodplain 
    management strategies;
        (2) continued maintenance of the navigation project;
        (3) management of bank caving and erosion;
        (4) watershed nutrient and sediment management;
        (5) habitat management;
        (6) recreation needs; and
        (7) other related purposes.
    (b) Contents.--The plan under subsection (a) shall--
        (1) contain recommendations on management plans and actions to 
    be carried out by the responsible Federal and non-Federal entities;
        (2) specifically address recommendations to authorize 
    construction of a systemic flood control project for the upper 
    Mississippi River; and
        (3) include recommendations for Federal action where 
    appropriate and recommendations for follow-on studies for problem 
    areas for which data or current technology does not allow immediate 
    solutions.
    (c) Consultation and Use of Existing Data.--In carrying out this 
section, the Secretary shall--
        (1) consult with appropriate Federal and State agencies; and
        (2) make maximum use of data in existence on the date of 
    enactment of this Act and ongoing programs and efforts of Federal 
    agencies and States in developing the plan under subsection (a).
    (d) Cost Sharing.--
        (1) Development.--Development of the plan under subsection (a) 
    shall be at Federal expense.
        (2) Feasibility studies.--Feasibility studies resulting from 
    development of the plan shall be subject to cost sharing under 
    section 105 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
    U.S.C. 2215).
    (e) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation 
and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report that includes the 
plan under subsection (a).

SEC. 460. SUSQUEHANNA RIVER AND UPPER CHESAPEAKE BAY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of controlling 
and managing waterborne debris in the interest of navigation, flood 
control, environmental restoration, and other purposes in the 
Susquehanna River Basin, New York, Pennsylvania, and Maryland, and the 
upper Chesapeake Bay, Maryland.
    (b) Evaluation of Technologies and Practices.--The study shall 
include an evaluation of technologies and practices currently 
available, in use, or in development in the United States for debris 
removal programs at various dams and harbors and recommendations for 
applying those techniques and practices in the Susquehanna River and 
the upper Chesapeake Bay.
    (c) Cooperation.--The study shall be conducted in cooperation with 
State agencies and other Federal agencies, the Susquehanna River Basin 
Commission, and owners of major dams.

                   TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

SEC. 501. CORPS ASSUMPTION OF NRCS PROJECTS.

    (a) Llagas Creek, California.--The Secretary may complete the 
remaining reaches of the Natural Resources Conservation Service flood 
control project at Llagas Creek, California, undertaken pursuant to 
section 5 of the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act (16 
U.S.C. 1005), substantially in accordance with the Natural Resources 
Conservation Service watershed plan for Llagas Creek, Department of 
Agriculture, and in accordance with the requirements of local 
cooperation as specified in section 4 of that Act (16 U.S.C. 1004), at 
a total cost of $45,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$21,800,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $23,200,000.
    (b) Thornton Reservoir, Cook County, Illinois.--
        (1) In general.--The Thornton Reservoir project, an element of 
    the project for flood control, Chicagoland Underflow Plan, 
    Illinois, authorized by section 3(a)(5) of the Water Resources 
    Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4013), is modified to authorize 
    the Secretary to include additional permanent flood control storage 
    attributable to the Natural Resources Conservation Service Thornton 
    Reservoir (Structure 84), Little Calumet River Watershed, Illinois, 
    approved under the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act 
    (16 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.).
        (2) Limitation.--No funds may be obligated to carry out work 
    under the modification under paragraph (1) until completion and 
    approval by the Secretary of a final report by the Chief of 
    Engineers finding that the work is technically sound, 
    environmentally acceptable, and economically justified.
        (3) Cost sharing.--Costs for the Thornton Reservoir project 
    shall be shared in accordance with section 103 of the Water 
    Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213).
        (4) Transitional storage.--The Secretary of Agriculture may 
    cooperate with non-Federal interests to provide, on a transitional 
    basis, flood control storage for the Natural Resources Conservation 
    Service Thornton Reservoir (Structure 84) project in the west lobe 
    of the Thornton quarry.
        (5) Credit toward non-federal share.--The Secretary may credit 
    toward the non-Federal share of the costs of the Thornton Reservoir 
    project all design and construction costs incurred by the non-
    Federal interests before the date of signing of the project 
    cooperation agreement.
        (6) Reevaluation report.--The Secretary shall determine the 
    credits authorized by paragraph (5) that are integral to the 
    Thornton Reservoir project and the current total project costs 
    based on a limited reevaluation report.

SEC. 502. ENVIRONMENTAL INFRASTRUCTURE.

    (a) In General.--Section 219(e) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757) is amended by striking 
paragraphs (5) and (6) and inserting the following:
        ``(5) $25,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
    (c)(2);
        ``(6) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
    (c)(9);
        ``(7) $30,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
    (c)(16); and
        ``(8) $30,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
    (c)(17).''.
    (b) Additional Assistance.--Section 219 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(f) Additional Assistance.--The Secretary may provide assistance 
under subsection (a) and assistance for construction for the following:
        ``(1) Atlanta, georgia.--The project described in subsection 
    (c)(2), modified to include $25,000,000 for watershed restoration 
    and development in the regional Atlanta watershed, including Big 
    Creek and Rock Creek.
        ``(2) Paterson, passaic county, and passaic valley, new 
    jersey.--The project described in subsection (c)(9), modified to 
    include $20,000,000 for drainage facilities to alleviate flooding 
    problems on Getty Avenue in the vicinity of St. Joseph's Hospital 
    for the city of Paterson, New Jersey, and Passaic County, New 
    Jersey, and innovative facilities to manage and treat additional 
    flows in the Passaic Valley, Passaic River basin, New Jersey.
        ``(3) Nashua, new hampshire.--$20,000,000 for a project to 
    eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of 
    Nashua, New Hampshire.
        ``(4) Fall river and new bedford, massachusetts.--$15,000,000 
    for a project to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in 
    the cities of Fall River and New Bedford, Massachusetts.
        ``(5) Findlay township, pennsylvania.--$11,000,000 for water 
    and wastewater infrastructure in Findlay Township, Allegheny 
    County, Pennsylvania.
        ``(6) Dillsburg borough authority, pennsylvania.--$2,000,000 
    for water and wastewater infrastructure in Franklin Township, York 
    County, Pennsylvania.
        ``(7) Hampden township, pennsylvania.--$3,000,000 for water, 
    sewer, and storm sewer improvements in Hampden Township, 
    Pennsylvania.
        ``(8) Towamencin township, pennsylvania.--$1,500,000 for 
    sanitary sewer and water and wastewater infrastructure in 
    Towamencin Township, Pennsylvania.
        ``(9) Dauphin county, pennsylvania.--$2,000,000 for a project 
    to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows and water system 
    rehabilitation for the city of Harrisburg, Dauphin County, 
    Pennsylvania.
        ``(10) Eastern shore and southwest virginia.--$20,000,000 for 
    water supply and wastewater infrastructure projects in the counties 
    of Accomac, Northampton, Lee, Norton, Wise, Scott, Russell, 
    Dickenson, Buchanan, and Tazewell, Virginia.
        ``(11) Northeast pennsylvania.--$20,000,000 for water related 
    infrastructure in the counties of Lackawanna, Lycoming, 
    Susquehanna, Wyoming, Pike, Wayne, Sullivan, Bradford, and Monroe, 
    Pennsylvania, including assistance for the Mountoursville Regional 
    Sewer Authority, Lycoming County, Pennsylvania.
        ``(12) Calumet region, indiana.--$10,000,000 for water related 
    infrastructure projects in the counties of Lake and Porter, 
    Indiana.
        ``(13) Clinton county, pennsylvania.--$1,000,000 for water 
    related infrastructure in Clinton County, Pennsylvania.
        ``(14) Patton township, pennsylvania.--$1,400,000 for water 
    related infrastructure in Patton Township, Pennsylvania.
        ``(15) North fayette township, allegheny county, 
    pennsylvania.--$500,000 for water related infrastructure in North 
    Fayette Township, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
        ``(16) Springdale borough, pennsylvania.--$500,000 for water 
    related infrastructure in Springdale Borough, Pennsylvania.
        ``(17) Robinson township, pennsylvania.--$1,200,000 for water 
    related infrastructure in Robinson Township, Pennsylvania.
        ``(18) Upper allen township, pennsylvania.--$3,400,000 for 
    water related infrastructure in Upper Allen Township, Pennsylvania.
        ``(19) Jefferson township, greene county, pennsylvania.--
    $1,000,000 for water related infrastructure in Jefferson Township, 
    Greene County, Pennsylvania.
        ``(20) Lumberton, north carolina.--$1,700,000 for water and 
    wastewater infrastructure projects in Lumberton, North Carolina.
        ``(21) Baton rouge, louisiana.--$10,000,000 for water related 
    infrastructure for the parishes of East Baton Rouge, Ascension, and 
    Livingston, Louisiana.
        ``(22) East san joaquin county, california.--$25,000,000 for 
    ground water recharge and conjunctive use projects in Stockton East 
    Water District, California.
        ``(23) Sacramento area, california.--$25,000,000 for regional 
    water conservation and recycling projects in Placer and El Dorado 
    Counties and the San Juan Suburban Water District, California.
        ``(24) Cumberland county, tennessee.--$5,000,000 for water 
    supply projects in Cumberland County, Tennessee.
        ``(25) Lakes marion and moultrie, south carolina.--$5,000,000 
    for water supply treatment and distribution projects in the 
    counties of Calhoun, Clarendon, Colleton, Dorchester, Orangeberg, 
    and Sumter, South Carolina.
        ``(26) Bridgeport, connecticut.--$10,000,000 for a project to 
    eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of 
    Bridgeport, Connecticut.
        ``(27) Hartford, connecticut.--$10,000,000 for a project to 
    eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of 
    Hartford, Connecticut.
        ``(28) New haven, connecticut.--$10,000,000 for a project to 
    eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of New 
    Haven, Connecticut.
        ``(29) Oakland county, michigan.--$20,000,000 for a project to 
    eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the cities of 
    Berkley, Ferndale, Madison Heights, Royal Oak, Birmingham, Hazel 
    Park, Oak Park, Southfield, Clawson, Huntington Woods, Pleasant 
    Ridge, and Troy, and the village of Beverly Hills, and the Charter 
    Township of Royal Oak, Michigan.
        ``(30) Desoto county, mississippi.--$10,000,000 for a 
    wastewater treatment project in the county of DeSoto, Mississippi.
        ``(31) Kansas city, missouri.--$15,000,000 for a project to 
    eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of Kansas 
    City, Missouri.
        ``(32) St. louis, missouri.--$15,000,000 for a project to 
    eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of St. 
    Louis, Missouri.
        ``(33) Elizabeth, new jersey.--$20,000,000 for a project to 
    eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of 
    Elizabeth, New Jersey.
        ``(34) North hudson, new jersey.--$10,000,000 for a project to 
    eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of North 
    Hudson, New Jersey.
        ``(35) Inner harbor project, new york, new york.--$15,000,000 
    for a project to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows for 
    the inner harbor project, New York, New York.
        ``(36) Outer harbor project, new york, new york.--$15,000,000 
    for a project to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows for 
    the outer harbor project, New York, New York.
        ``(37) Lebanon, new hampshire.--$8,000,000 for a project to 
    eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in the city of 
    Lebanon, New Hampshire.
        ``(38) Astoria, oregon.--$5,000,000 for a project to eliminate 
    or control combined sewer overflows in the city of Astoria, Oregon.
        ``(39) Cache county, utah.--$5,000,000 for a wastewater 
    infrastructure project for Cache County, Utah.
        ``(40) Lawton, oklahoma.--$5,000,000 for a wastewater 
    infrastructure project for the city of Lawton, Oklahoma.
        ``(41) Lancaster, california.--$1,500,000 for a project to 
    provide water facilities for the Fox Field Industrial Corridor, 
    Lancaster, California.
        ``(42) San ramon valley, california.--$15,000,000 for a project 
    for recycled water for San Ramon Valley, California.
        ``(43) Harbor/south bay, california.--$15,000,000 for an 
    industrial water reuse project for the Harbor/South Bay area, 
    California.''.

SEC. 503. CONTAMINATED SEDIMENT DREDGING TECHNOLOGY.

    (a) Review of Innovative Dredging Technologies.--
        (1) In general.--Not later than June 1, 2001, the Secretary 
    shall complete a review of innovative dredging technologies 
    designed to minimize or eliminate contamination of a water column 
    upon removal of contaminated sediments.
        (2) Testing.--
            (A) Selection of technology.--After completion of the 
        review under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall select, from 
        among the technologies reviewed, the technology that the 
        Secretary determines will best increase the effectiveness of 
        removing contaminated sediments and significantly reduce 
        contamination of the water column.
            (B) Agreement.--Not later than December 31, 2001, the 
        Secretary shall enter into an agreement with a public or 
        private entity to test the selected technology in the vicinity 
        of Peoria Lakes, Illinois.
        (3) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
    appropriated to carry out this subsection $2,000,000.
    (b) Accelerated Adoption of Innovative Technologies.--Section 8 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (33 U.S.C. 2314) is 
amended--
        (1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections (c) 
    and (d), respectively; and
        (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
    ``(b) Accelerated Adoption of Innovative Technologies for 
Management of Contaminated Sediments.--
        ``(1) Test projects.--The Secretary shall approve an 
    appropriate number of projects to test, under actual field 
    conditions, innovative technologies for environmentally sound 
    management of contaminated sediments.
        ``(2) Demonstration projects.--The Secretary may approve an 
    appropriate number of projects to demonstrate innovative 
    technologies that have been pilot tested under paragraph (1).
        ``(3) Conduct of projects.--Each pilot project under paragraph 
    (1) and demonstration project under paragraph (2) shall be 
    conducted by a university with proven expertise in the research and 
    development of contaminated sediment treatment technologies and 
    innovative applications using waste materials.
        ``(4) Location.--At least 1 of the projects under this 
    subsection shall be conducted in New England by the University of 
    New Hampshire.''.

SEC. 504. DAM SAFETY.

    (a) Assistance.--The Secretary may provide assistance to enhance 
dam safety at the following locations:
        (1) Healdsburg Veteran's Memorial Dam, California.
        (2) Kehly Run Dam, Pennsylvania.
        (3) Sweet Arrow Lake Dam, Pennsylvania.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $6,000,000.

SEC. 505. GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS.

    Section 401(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
(33 U.S.C. 1268 note; 104 Stat. 4644; 110 Stat. 3763) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``Non-Federal'' and inserting the following:
            ``(A) In general.--Non-Federal''; and
        (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(B) Contributions by entities.--Nonprofit public or 
        private entities may contribute all or a portion of the non-
        Federal share.''.

SEC. 506. PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT.

    Section 1135(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2309a(c)) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``If the Secretary'' and inserting the 
    following:
        ``(1) In general.--If the Secretary''; and
        (2) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(2) Control of sea lamprey.--Congress finds that--
            ``(A) the Great Lakes navigation system has been 
        instrumental in the spread of sea lamprey and the associated 
        impacts on its fishery; and
            ``(B) the use of the authority under this subsection for 
        control of sea lamprey at any Great Lakes basin location is 
        appropriate.''.

SEC. 507. MAINTENANCE OF NAVIGATION CHANNELS.

    Section 509(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3759) is amended by adding at the end the following:
        ``(12) Acadiana Navigation Channel, Louisiana.
        ``(13) Contraband Bayou, Louisiana, as part of the Calcasieu 
    River and Pass Ship Channel.
        ``(14) Lake Wallula Navigation Channel, Washington.
        ``(15) Wadley Pass (also known as `McGriff Pass'), Suwanee 
    River, Florida.''.

SEC. 508. MEASUREMENTS OF LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSIONS, ILLINOIS.

    Section 1142(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4253) is amended by striking ``$250,000 per fiscal year for each 
fiscal year beginning after September 30, 1986,'' and inserting 
``$1,250,000 for each of fiscal years 1999 through 2003''.
    SEC. 509. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.
    (a) Authorized Activities.--Section 1103(e) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)) is amended by striking 
``(e)(1)'' and all that follows through the end of paragraph (1) and 
inserting the following:
    ``(e) Program Authority.--
        ``(1) Authority.--
            ``(A) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
        Secretary of the Interior and the States of Illinois, Iowa, 
        Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin, may undertake, as 
        identified in the master plan--
                ``(i) a program for the planning, construction, and 
            evaluation of measures for fish and wildlife habitat 
            rehabilitation and enhancement; and
                ``(ii) implementation of a long-term resource 
            monitoring, computerized data inventory and analysis, and 
            applied research program.
            ``(B) Advisory committee.--In carrying out subparagraph 
        (A)(i), the Secretary shall establish an independent technical 
        advisory committee to review projects, monitoring plans, and 
        habitat and natural resource needs assessments.''.
    (b) Reports.--Section 1103(e) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)) is amended by striking paragraph (2) and 
inserting the following:
        ``(2) Reports.--Not later than December 31, 2004, and not later 
    than December 31 of every sixth year thereafter, the Secretary, in 
    consultation with the Secretary of the Interior and the States of 
    Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin, shall submit to 
    Congress a report that--
            ``(A) contains an evaluation of the programs described in 
        paragraph (1);
            ``(B) describes the accomplishments of each of the 
        programs;
            ``(C) provides updates of a systemic habitat needs 
        assessment; and
            ``(D) identifies any needed adjustments in the 
        authorization of the programs.''.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 1103(e) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)) is amended--
        (1) in paragraph (3)--
            (A) by striking ``(1)(A)'' and inserting ``(1)(A)(i)''; and
            (B) by striking ``Secretary not to exceed'' and all that 
        follows before the period at the end and inserting ``Secretary 
        $22,750,000 for fiscal year 1999 and each fiscal year 
        thereafter'';
        (2) in paragraph (4)--
            (A) by striking ``(1)(B)'' and inserting ``(1)(A)(ii)''; 
        and
            (B) by striking ``Secretary not to exceed'' and all that 
        follows before the period at the end and inserting ``Secretary 
        $10,420,000 for fiscal year 1999 and each fiscal year 
        thereafter''; and
        (3) by striking paragraph (5) and inserting the following:
        ``(5) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to 
    be appropriated to carry out paragraph (1)(A)(i) $350,000 for each 
    of fiscal years 1999 through 2009.''.
    (d) Transfer of Amounts.--Section 1103(e) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)) is amended by striking 
paragraph (6) and inserting the following:
        ``(6) Transfer of amounts.--For fiscal year 1999 and each 
    fiscal year thereafter, the Secretary, in consultation with the 
    Secretary of the Interior and the States of Illinois, Iowa, 
    Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin, may transfer not to exceed 20 
    percent of the amounts appropriated to carry out clause (i) or (ii) 
    of paragraph (1)(A) to the amounts appropriated to carry out the 
    other of those clauses.''.
    (e) Cost Sharing.--Section 1103(e)(7)(A) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)(7)(A)) is amended by 
inserting before the period at the end the following: ``and, in the 
case of any project requiring non-Federal cost sharing, the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project shall be 35 percent''.
    (f) Habitat Needs Assessment.--Section 1103(h)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(h)(2)) is amended--
        (1) by striking ``(2) The Secretary'' and inserting the 
    following:
        ``(2) Determination.--
            ``(A) In general.--The Secretary''; and
        (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(B) Requirements.--The Secretary shall--
                ``(i) complete the ongoing habitat needs assessment 
            conducted under this paragraph not later than September 30, 
            2000; and
                ``(ii) include in each report under subsection (e)(2) 
            the most recent habitat needs assessment conducted under 
            this paragraph.''.
    (g) Conforming Amendments.--Section 1103 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (e)(7)--
            (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``(1)(A)'' and 
        inserting ``(1)(A)(i)''; and
            (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``paragraphs (1)(B) 
        and (1)(C)'' and inserting ``paragraph (1)(A)(ii)''; and
        (2) in subsection (f)(2)--
            (A) by striking ``(2)(A)'' and inserting ``(2)''; and
            (B) by striking subparagraph (B).

SEC. 510. ATLANTIC COAST OF NEW YORK.

    Section 404(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4863) is amended in the first sentence--
        (1) by striking ``is'' and inserting ``are''; and
        (2) by inserting after ``1997'' the following: ``, and an 
    additional total of $2,500,000 for fiscal years thereafter''.

SEC. 511. WATER CONTROL MANAGEMENT.

    (a) In General.--In evaluating potential improvements for water 
control management activities and consolidation of water control 
management centers, the Secretary may consider a regionalized water 
control management plan but may not implement such a plan until the 
date on which a report is submitted under subsection (b).
    (b) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation 
and Infrastructure and the Committee on Appropriations of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public Works and 
the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate a report containing--
        (1) a description of the primary objectives of streamlining 
    water control management activities;
        (2) a description of the benefits provided by streamlining 
    water control management activities through consolidation of 
    centers for those activities;
        (3) a determination whether the benefits to users of 
    establishing regional water control management centers will be 
    retained in each district office of the Corps of Engineers that 
    does not have a regional center;
        (4) a determination whether users of regional centers will 
    receive a higher level of benefits from streamlining water control 
    management activities; and
        (5) a list of the members of Congress who represent a district 
    that includes a water control management center that is to be 
    eliminated under a proposed regionalized plan.

SEC. 512. BENEFICIAL USE OF DREDGED MATERIAL.

    The Secretary may carry out the following projects under section 
204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326):
        (1) Bodega bay, california.--A project to make beneficial use 
    of dredged material from a Federal navigation project in Bodega 
    Bay, California.
        (2) Sabine refuge, louisiana.--A project to make beneficial use 
    of dredged material from Federal navigation projects in the 
    vicinity of Sabine Refuge, Louisiana.
        (3) Hancock, harrison, and jackson counties, mississippi.--A 
    project to make beneficial use of dredged material from a Federal 
    navigation project in Hancock, Harrison, and Jackson Counties, 
    Mississippi.
        (4) Rose city marsh, orange county, texas.--A project to make 
    beneficial use of dredged material from a Federal navigation 
    project in Rose City Marsh, Orange County, Texas.
        (5) Bessie heights marsh, orange county, texas.--A project to 
    make beneficial use of dredged material from a Federal navigation 
    project in Bessie Heights Marsh, Orange County, Texas.

SEC. 513. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE.

    Section 507 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3758) is amended by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the 
following:
        ``(2) Expansion and improvement of Long Pine Run Dam, 
    Pennsylvania, and associated water infrastructure, in accordance 
    with subsections (b) through (e) of section 313 of the Water 
    Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4845), at a total cost 
    of $20,000,000.''.
    SEC. 514. MISSOURI AND MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVERS ENHANCEMENT 
      PROJECT.
    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
        (1) Middle mississippi river.--The term ``middle Mississippi 
    River'' means the reach of the Mississippi River from the mouth of 
    the Ohio River (river mile 0, upper Mississippi River) to the mouth 
    of the Missouri River (river mile 195).
        (2) Missouri river.--The term ``Missouri River'' means the main 
    stem and floodplain of the Missouri River (including reservoirs) 
    from its confluence with the Mississippi River at St. Louis, 
    Missouri, to its headwaters near Three Forks, Montana.
        (3) Project.--The term ``project'' means the project authorized 
    by this section.
    (b) Protection and Enhancement Activities.--
        (1) Plan.--
            (A) Development.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall develop a plan for a 
        project to protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat of the 
        Missouri River and the middle Mississippi River.
            (B) Activities.--
                (i) In general.--The plan shall provide for such 
            activities as are necessary to protect and enhance fish and 
            wildlife habitat without adversely affecting--

                    (I) the water-related needs of the region 
                surrounding the Missouri River and the middle 
                Mississippi River, including flood control, navigation, 
                recreation, and enhancement of water supply; and
                    (II) private property rights.

                (ii) Required activities.--The plan shall include--

                    (I) modification and improvement of navigation 
                training structures to protect and enhance fish and 
                wildlife habitat;
                    (II) modification and creation of side channels to 
                protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat;
                    (III) restoration and creation of island fish and 
                wildlife habitat;
                    (IV) creation of riverine fish and wildlife 
                habitat;
                    (V) establishment of criteria for prioritizing the 
                type and sequencing of activities based on cost-
                effectiveness and likelihood of success; and
                    (VI) physical and biological monitoring for 
                evaluating the success of the project, to be performed 
                by the River Studies Center of the United States 
                Geological Survey in Columbia, Missouri.

        (2) Implementation of activities.--
            (A) In general.--Using funds made available to carry out 
        this section, the Secretary shall carry out the activities 
        described in the plan.
            (B) Use of existing authority for unconstructed features of 
        the project.--Using funds made available to the Secretary under 
        other law, the Secretary shall design and construct any feature 
        of the project that may be carried out using the authority of 
        the Secretary to modify an authorized project, if the Secretary 
        determines that the design and construction will--
                (i) accelerate the completion of activities to protect 
            and enhance fish and wildlife habitat of the Missouri River 
            or the middle Mississippi River; and
                (ii) be compatible with the project purposes described 
            in this section.
    (c) Integration of Other Activities.--
        (1) In general.--In carrying out the activities described in 
    subsection (b), the Secretary shall integrate the activities with 
    other Federal, State, and tribal activities.
        (2) New authority.--Nothing in this section confers any new 
    regulatory authority on any Federal or non-Federal entity that 
    carries out any activity authorized by this section.
    (d) Public Participation.--In developing and carrying out the plan 
and the activities described in subsection (b), the Secretary shall 
provide for public review and comment in accordance with applicable 
Federal law, including--
        (1) providing advance notice of meetings;
        (2) providing adequate opportunity for public input and 
    comment;
        (3) maintaining appropriate records; and
        (4) compiling a record of the proceedings of meetings.
    (e) Compliance With Applicable Law.--In carrying out the plan and 
the activities described in subsections (b) and (c), the Secretary 
shall comply with any applicable Federal law, including the National 
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
    (f) Cost Sharing.--
        (1) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
    the project shall be 35 percent.
        (2) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of any 1 
    activity described in subsection (b) shall not exceed $5,000,000.
        (3) Operation and maintenance.--The operation and maintenance 
    of the project shall be a non-Federal responsibility.
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to pay the Federal share of the cost of carrying out this 
section $30,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2000 and 2001.
    SEC. 515. IRRIGATION DIVERSION PROTECTION AND FISHERIES ENHANCEMENT 
      ASSISTANCE.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide technical planning and 
design assistance to non-Federal interests and may conduct other site-
specific studies to formulate and evaluate fish screens, fish passages 
devices, and other measures to decrease the incidence of juvenile and 
adult fish inadvertently entering irrigation systems.
    (b) Cooperation.--Measures under subsection (a)--
        (1) shall be developed in cooperation with Federal and State 
    resource agencies; and
        (2) shall not impair the continued withdrawal of water for 
    irrigation purposes.
    (c) Priority.--In providing assistance under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall give priority based on--
        (1) the objectives of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 
    U.S.C. 1531 et seq.);
        (2) cost-effectiveness; and
        (3) the potential for reducing fish mortality.
    (d) Non-Federal Share.--
        (1) In general.--The non-Federal share of the cost of measures 
    under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent.
        (2) In-kind contributions.--Not more than 50 percent of the 
    non-Federal contribution may be made through the provision of 
    services, materials, supplies, or other in-kind contributions.
    (e) No Construction Activity.--This section does not authorize any 
construction activity.
    (f) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on--
        (1) fish mortality caused by irrigation water intake devices;
        (2) appropriate measures to reduce fish mortality;
        (3) the extent to which those measures are currently being 
    employed in arid States;
        (4) the construction costs associated with those measures; and
        (5) the appropriate Federal role, if any, to encourage the use 
    of those measures.
    SEC. 516. INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES FOR WATERSHED RESTORATION.
    The Secretary shall examine using, and, if appropriate, encourage 
the use of, innovative treatment technologies, including membrane 
technologies, for watershed and environmental restoration and 
protection projects involving water quality.

SEC. 517. EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN PROJECTS.

    The Secretary shall expedite completion of the reports for the 
following projects and, if justified, proceed directly to project 
preconstruction, engineering, and design:
        (1) Sluice Creek, Guilford, Connecticut, and Lighthouse Point 
    Park, New Haven, Connecticut.
        (2) Alafia Channel, Tampa Harbor, Florida, project for 
    navigation.
        (3) Little Calumet River, Indiana.
        (4) Ohio River Greenway, Indiana, project for environmental 
    restoration and recreation.
        (5) Mississippi River, West Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana, 
    project for waterfront and riverine preservation, restoration, and 
    enhancement modifications.
        (6) Extension of locks 20, 21, 22, 24, and 25 on the upper 
    Mississippi River and the La Grange and Peoria locks on the 
    Illinois River, project to provide lock chambers 110 feet in width 
    and 1,200 feet in length.

SEC. 518. DOG RIVER, ALABAMA.

    The Secretary shall provide $1,500,000 for environmental 
restoration for a pilot project, in cooperation with non-Federal 
interests, to restore natural water depths in the Dog River, Alabama.

SEC. 519. LEVEES IN ELBA AND GENEVA, ALABAMA.

    (a) Elba, Alabama.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary may repair and rehabilitate a 
    levee in the city of Elba, Alabama, at a total cost of $12,900,000.
        (2) Cost sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of repair 
    and rehabilitation under paragraph (1) shall be 35 percent.
    (b) Geneva, Alabama.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary may repair and rehabilitate a 
    levee in the city of Geneva, Alabama, at a total cost of 
    $16,600,000.
        (2) Cost sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of repair 
    and rehabilitation under paragraph (1) shall be 35 percent.

SEC. 520. NAVAJO RESERVATION, ARIZONA, NEW MEXICO, AND UTAH.

    (a) In General.--In cooperation with other appropriate Federal and 
local agencies, the Secretary shall undertake a survey of, and provide 
technical, planning, and design assistance for, watershed management, 
restoration, and development on the Navajo Indian Reservation, Arizona, 
New Mexico, and Utah.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--The Federal share of the cost of activities 
carried out under this section shall be 75 percent. Funds made 
available under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance 
Act (25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.) may be used by the Navajo Nation in meeting 
the non-Federal share of the cost of the activities.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $12,000,000 for the period 
beginning with fiscal year 2000.
    SEC. 521. BEAVER LAKE, ARKANSAS, WATER SUPPLY STORAGE REALLOCATION.
    The Secretary shall reallocate approximately 31,000 additional 
acre-feet at Beaver Lake, Arkansas, to water supply storage at no cost 
to the Beaver Water District or the Carroll-Boone Water District, 
except that at no time shall the bottom of the conservation pool be at 
an elevation that is less than 1,076 feet, NGVD.

SEC. 522. BEAVER LAKE TROUT PRODUCTION FACILITY, ARKANSAS.

    Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary, in conjunction with the State of Arkansas, shall prepare a 
plan for the mitigation of effects of the Beaver Dam project on Beaver 
Lake, including the benefits of and schedule for construction of the 
Beaver Lake trout production facility and related facilities.

SEC. 523. CHINO DAIRY PRESERVE, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Technical Assistance.--The Secretary, in coordination with the 
heads of other Federal agencies, shall provide technical assistance to 
State and local agencies in the study, design, and implementation of 
measures for flood damage reduction and environmental restoration and 
protection in the Santa Ana River watershed, California, with 
particular emphasis on structural and nonstructural measures in the 
vicinity of the Chino Dairy Preserve.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of activities 
assisted under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent.
    (c) Comprehensive Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a feasibility 
study to determine the most cost-effective plan for flood damage 
reduction and environmental restoration and protection in the vicinity 
of the Chino Dairy Preserve, Santa Ana River watershed, Orange County 
and San Bernardino County, California.

SEC. 524. ORANGE AND SAN DIEGO COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with local 
governments, may prepare special area management plans for Orange and 
San Diego Counties, California, to demonstrate the effectiveness of 
using the plans to provide information regarding aquatic resources.
    (b) Use of Plans.--The Secretary may--
        (1) use plans described in subsection (a) in making regulatory 
    decisions; and
        (2) issue permits consistent with the plans.

SEC. 525. RUSH CREEK, NOVATO, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall carry out a project for flood control under 
section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) at Rush 
Creek, Novato, California, if the Secretary determines that the project 
is technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and economically 
justified.

SEC. 526. SANTA CRUZ HARBOR, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary may--
        (1) modify the cooperative agreement with the Santa Cruz Port 
    District, California, to reflect unanticipated additional dredging 
    effort; and
        (2) extend the agreement for 10 years.

SEC. 527. LOWER ST. JOHNS RIVER BASIN, FLORIDA.

    (a) Computer Model.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary may apply the computer model 
    developed under the St. Johns River basin feasibility study to 
    assist non-Federal interests in developing strategies for improving 
    water quality in the Lower St. Johns River basin, Florida.
        (2) Cost sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
    activities assisted under paragraph (1) shall be 50 percent.
    (b) Topographic Survey.--The Secretary may provide 1-foot contour 
topographic survey maps of the Lower St. Johns River basin, Florida, to 
non-Federal interests for analyzing environmental data and establishing 
benchmarks for subbasins.

SEC. 528. MAYO'S BAR LOCK AND DAM, COOSA RIVER, ROME, GEORGIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide technical assistance 
(including planning, engineering, and design assistance) for the 
reconstruction of the Mayo's Bar Lock and Dam, Coosa River, Rome, 
Georgia.
    (b) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
activities assisted under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent.
    SEC. 529. COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD IMPACT RESPONSE MODELING SYSTEM, 
      CORALVILLE RESERVOIR AND IOWA RIVER WATERSHED, IOWA.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the University 
of Iowa, shall conduct a study and develop a comprehensive flood impact 
response modeling system for Coralville Reservoir and the Iowa River 
watershed, Iowa.
    (b) Study.--The study shall include--
        (1) an evaluation of the combined hydrologic, geomorphic, 
    environmental, economic, social, and recreational impacts of 
    operating strategies within the watershed;
        (2) creation of an integrated, dynamic flood impact model; and
        (3) the development of a rapid response system to be used 
    during flood and emergency situations.
    (c) Report to Congress.--Not later than 5 years after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit a report to Congress 
on the results of the study and modeling system and such 
recommendations as the Secretary determines to be appropriate.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $3,000,000.

SEC. 530. ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE IN ILLINOIS.

    The Secretary may carry out the project for Georgetown, Illinois, 
and the project for Olney, Illinois, referred to in House Report Number 
104-741, accompanying the Safe Drinking Water Act Amendments of 1996 
(Public Law 104-182).

SEC. 531. KANOPOLIS LAKE, KANSAS.

    (a) Water Storage.--The Secretary shall offer to the State of 
Kansas the right to purchase water storage in Kanopolis Lake, Kansas, 
at the average of--
        (1) the cost calculated in accordance with the terms of the 
    memorandum of understanding entitled ``Memorandum of Understanding 
    Between the State of Kansas and the U.S. Department of the Army 
    Concerning the Purchase of Municipal and Industrial Water Supply 
    Storage'', dated December 11, 1985; and
        (2) the cost calculated in accordance with procedures 
    established as of the date of enactment of this Act by the 
    Secretary to determine the cost of water storage at other projects 
    under the Secretary's jurisdiction.
    (b) Effective Date.--For the purposes of this section, the 
effective date of the memorandum of understanding referred to in 
subsection (a)(1) shall be deemed to be the date of enactment of this 
Act.

SEC. 532. SOUTHERN AND EASTERN KENTUCKY.

    Section 531 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3773) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (b)--
            (A) by striking ``and surface'' and inserting ``surface''; 
        and
            (B) by striking ``development.'' and inserting 
        ``development, and small stream flooding, local storm water 
        drainage, and related problems.'';
        (2) in subsection (d)(1), by adding at the end the following: 
    ``Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1970 
    (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), for any project undertaken under this 
    section, with the consent of the affected local government, a non-
    Federal interest may include a nonprofit entity.''; and
        (3) in subsection (h), by striking ``$10,000,000'' and 
    inserting ``$25,000,000''.

SEC. 533. SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA.

    Section 533(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3775) is amended by striking ``$100,000,000'' and inserting 
``$250,000,000''.

SEC. 534. SNUG HARBOR, MARYLAND.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in coordination with the Director 
of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, may--
        (1) provide technical assistance to the residents of Snug 
    Harbor, in the vicinity of Berlin, Maryland, for the purpose of 
    flood damage reduction;
        (2) conduct a study of a project consisting of nonstructural 
    measures for flood damage reduction in the vicinity of Snug Harbor, 
    Maryland, taking into account the relationship of both the Ocean 
    City Inlet and Assateague Island to the flooding; and
        (3) after completion of the study, carry out the project under 
    section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
    (b) FEMA Assistance.--The Director, in coordination with the 
Secretary and under the authorities of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.), may 
provide technical assistance and nonstructural measures for flood 
damage mitigation in the vicinity of Snug Harbor, Maryland.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--
        (1) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of assistance 
    under this section shall not exceed $3,000,000.
        (2) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
    assistance under this section shall be determined in accordance 
    with title I of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
    U.S.C. 2211 et seq.) or the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
    Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.), as appropriate.
    SEC. 535. WELCH POINT, ELK RIVER, CECIL COUNTY, AND CHESAPEAKE 
      CITY, MARYLAND.
    (a) Spillage of Dredged Materials.--The Secretary shall carry out a 
study to determine whether the spillage of dredged materials that were 
removed as part of the project for navigation, Inland Waterway from 
Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, Delaware and Maryland, authorized by 
the first section of the Act of August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 1030, chapter 
831), is a significant impediment to vessels transiting the Elk River 
near Welch Point, Maryland. If the Secretary determines that the 
spillage is an impediment to navigation, the Secretary may conduct such 
dredging as may be required to permit navigation on the river.
    (b) Damage to Water Supply.--The Secretary shall carry out a study 
to determine whether additional compensation is required to fully 
compensate the city of Chesapeake, Maryland, for damage to the city's 
water supply resulting from dredging of the Chesapeake and Delaware 
Canal project. If the Secretary determines that such additional 
compensation is required, the Secretary may provide the compensation to 
the city of Chesapeake.
    SEC. 536. CAPE COD CANAL RAILROAD BRIDGE, BUZZARDS BAY, 
      MASSACHUSETTS.
    (a) Alternative Transportation.--The Secretary may provide up to 
$300,000 for meeting the need for alternative transportation that may 
arise as a result of the operation, maintenance, repair, and 
rehabilitation of the Cape Cod Canal Railroad Bridge.
    (b) Operation and Maintenance Contract Renegotiation.--Not later 
than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
shall enter into negotiation with the owner of the railroad right-of-
way for the Cape Cod Canal Railroad Bridge for the purpose of 
establishing the rights and responsibilities for the operation and 
maintenance of the Bridge. The Secretary may include in any new 
contract the termination of the prior contract numbered ER-W175-ENG-1.

SEC. 537. ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.

    (a) Demonstration Project.--The Secretary, in consultation with 
local officials, shall conduct a demonstration project to improve water 
quality in the vicinity of St. Louis, Missouri.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $1,700,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 538. BEAVER BRANCH OF BIG TIMBER CREEK, NEW JERSEY.

    At the request of the State of New Jersey or a political 
subdivision of the State, using authority under law in effect on the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary may--
        (1) compile and disseminate information on floods and flood 
    damage, including identification of areas subject to inundation by 
    floods; and
        (2) provide technical assistance regarding floodplain 
    management for the Beaver Branch of Big Timber Creek, New Jersey.
    SEC. 539. LAKE ONTARIO AND ST. LAWRENCE RIVER WATER LEVELS, NEW 
      YORK.
    On request, the Secretary may provide technical assistance to the 
International Joint Commission and the St. Lawrence River Board of 
Control in undertaking studies on the effects of fluctuating water 
levels on the natural environment, recreational boating, property 
flooding, and erosion along the shorelines of Lake Ontario and the St. 
Lawrence River in New York. The Commission and the Board are encouraged 
to conduct such studies in a comprehensive and thorough manner before 
implementing any change to Water Regulation Plan 1958-D.
    SEC. 540. NEW YORK-NEW JERSEY HARBOR, NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to analyze the 
economic and environmental benefits and costs of potential sediment 
management and contaminant reduction measures.
    (b) Cooperative Agreements.--In conducting the study, the Secretary 
may enter into cooperative agreements with non-Federal interests to 
investigate, develop, and support measures for sediment management and 
reduction of sources of contaminant that affect navigation in the Port 
of New York-New Jersey and the environmental conditions of the New 
York-New Jersey Harbor estuary.

SEC. 541. SEA GATE REACH, CONEY ISLAND, NEW YORK, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary may construct a project for shoreline protection that 
includes a beachfill with revetment and T-groin for the Sea Gate Reach 
on Coney Island, New York, as identified in the March 1998 report 
prepared for the Corps of Engineers, New York District, entitled 
``Field Data Gathering, Project Performance Analysis and Design 
Alternative Solutions to Improve Sandfill Retention'', at a total cost 
of $9,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $5,850,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $3,150,000.

SEC. 542. WOODLAWN, NEW YORK.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide planning, design, and 
other technical assistance to non-Federal interests for identifying and 
mitigating sources of contamination at Woodlawn Beach in Woodlawn, New 
York.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of assistance 
provided under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent.

SEC. 543. FLOODPLAIN MAPPING, NEW YORK.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide assistance for a 
project to develop maps identifying 100- and 500-year flood inundation 
areas in the State of New York.
    (b) Requirements.--Maps developed under the project shall include 
hydrologic and hydraulic information and shall accurately show the 
flood inundation of each property by flood risk in the floodplain. The 
maps shall be produced in a high resolution format and shall be made 
available to all flood prone areas in the State of New York in an 
electronic format.
    (c) Participation of FEMA.--The Secretary and the non-Federal 
interests for the project shall work with the Director of the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency to ensure the validity of the maps 
developed under the project for flood insurance purposes.
    (d) Forms of Assistance.--In carrying out the project, the 
Secretary may enter into contracts or cooperative agreements with the 
non-Federal interests or provide reimbursements of project costs.
    (e) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the project 
shall be 50 percent.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000 for the period 
beginning with fiscal year 2000.
    SEC. 544. TOUSSAINT RIVER, CARROLL TOWNSHIP, OTTAWA COUNTY, OHIO.
    The Secretary may provide technical assistance for the removal of 
military ordnance from the Toussaint River, Carroll Township, Ottawa 
County, Ohio.

SEC. 545. SARDIS RESERVOIR, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall accept from the State of 
Oklahoma or an agent of the State an amount, determined under 
subsection (b), as prepayment of 100 percent of the water supply cost 
obligation of the State under Contract No. DACW56-74-JC-0314 for water 
supply storage at Sardis Reservoir, Oklahoma.
    (b) Determination of Amount.--The amount to be paid by the State of 
Oklahoma under subsection (a) shall be subject to adjustment in 
accordance with accepted discount purchase methods for Federal 
Government properties as determined by an independent accounting firm 
designated by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. The 
cost of the determination shall be paid for by the State of Oklahoma or 
an agent of the State.
    (c) Effect.--Nothing in this section affects any of the rights or 
obligations of the parties to the contract referred to in subsection 
(a).

SEC. 546. SKINNER BUTTE PARK, EUGENE, OREGON.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the south bank 
of the Willamette River, in the area of Skinner Butte Park from Ferry 
Street Bridge to the Valley River footbridge, to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project to stabilize the river bank, and 
to restore and enhance riverine habitat, using a combination of 
structural and bioengineering techniques.
    (b) Federal Participation.--If, on completion of the study, the 
Secretary determines that the project is technically sound, 
environmentally acceptable, and economically justified, the Secretary 
may participate with non-Federal interests in the project.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of the project 
shall be 35 percent.
    (d) Land, Easements, and Rights-of-Way.--
        (1) In general.--The non-Federal interest shall provide land, 
    easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and dredged material 
    disposal areas necessary for construction of the project.
        (2) Credit toward non-federal share.--The value of the land, 
    easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and dredged material 
    disposal areas provided by the non-Federal interests shall be 
    credited toward the non-Federal share.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $1,000,000 for the period 
beginning with fiscal year 2000.

SEC. 547. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OREGON.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, the Director of the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, the Administrator of the Environmental 
Protection Agency, and the heads of other appropriate Federal agencies 
shall, using authorities under law in effect on the date of enactment 
of this Act, assist the State of Oregon in developing and implementing 
a comprehensive basin-wide strategy in the Willamette River basin, 
Oregon, for coordinated and integrated management of land and water 
resources to improve water quality, reduce flood hazards, ensure 
sustainable economic activity, and restore habitat for native fish and 
wildlife.
    (b) Technical Assistance, Staff, and Financial Support.--The heads 
of the Federal agencies may provide technical assistance, staff, and 
financial support for development of the basin-wide management 
strategy.
    (c) Flexibility.--The heads of the Federal agencies shall exercise 
flexibility to reduce barriers to efficient and effective 
implementation of the basin-wide management strategy.

SEC. 548. BRADFORD AND SULLIVAN COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary may provide assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in Bradford and Sullivan Counties, Pennsylvania, using the 
funds and authorities provided in title I of the Energy and Water 
Development Appropriations Act, 1999 (Public Law 105-245), under the 
heading ``Construction, General'' (112 Stat. 1840) for similar projects 
in Lackawanna, Lycoming, Susquehanna, Wyoming, Pike, and Monroe 
Counties, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 549. ERIE HARBOR, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary may reimburse the appropriate non-Federal interest 
not more than $78,366 for architectural and engineering costs incurred 
in connection with the Erie Harbor basin navigation project, 
Pennsylvania.

SEC. 550. POINT MARION LOCK AND DAM, PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Point Marion Lock and 
Dam, borough of Point Marion, Pennsylvania, authorized by section 
301(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4110), 
is modified to direct the Secretary, in the operation and maintenance 
of the project, to mitigate damages to the shoreline, at a total cost 
of $2,000,000.
    (b) Allocation.--The cost of the mitigation shall be allocated as 
an operation and maintenance cost of a Federal navigation project.

SEC. 551. SEVEN POINTS' HARBOR, PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may, at full Federal expense, 
construct a breakwater at the entrance to Seven Points' Harbor, 
Pennsylvania.
    (b) Operation and Maintenance Costs.--All operation and maintenance 
costs associated with the facility constructed under this section shall 
be the responsibility of the lessee of the marina complex at Seven 
Points' Harbor.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $850,000.

SEC. 552. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 566(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3786) is amended by inserting ``environmental restoration,'' 
after ``water supply and related facilities,''.
    SEC. 553. UPPER SUSQUEHANNA-LACKAWANNA, PENNSYLVANIA, WATERSHED 
      MANAGEMENT AND RESTORATION STUDY.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of a comprehensive floodplain management and watershed 
restoration project for the Upper Susquehanna-Lackawanna Watershed, 
Pennsylvania.
    (b) Geographic Information System.--In conducting the study, the 
Secretary shall use a geographic information system.
    (c) Plans.--The study shall formulate plans for comprehensive 
floodplain management and environmental restoration.
    (d) Credit Toward Non-Federal Share.--Non-Federal interests may 
receive credit toward the non-Federal share for in-kind services and 
materials that contribute to the study. The Secretary may credit non-
Corps Federal assistance provided to the non-Federal interest toward 
the non-Federal share of the costs of the study to the maximum extent 
authorized by law.

SEC. 554. AGUADILLA HARBOR, PUERTO RICO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine whether erosion 
and additional storm damage risks that exist in the vicinity of 
Aguadilla Harbor, Puerto Rico, are the result of a Federal navigation 
project. If the Secretary determines that such erosion and additional 
storm damage risks are the result of the project, the Secretary shall 
take appropriate measures to mitigate the erosion and storm damage.

SEC. 555. OAHE DAM TO LAKE SHARPE, SOUTH DAKOTA, STUDY.

    Section 441 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3747) is amended--
        (1) by inserting ``(a) Investigation.--'' before ``The 
    Secretary''; and
        (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Report.--Not later than September 30, 1999, the Secretary 
shall submit to Congress a report on the results of the investigation 
under this section. The report shall include the examination of 
financing options for regular maintenance and preservation of the lake. 
The report shall be prepared in coordination and cooperation with the 
Natural Resources Conservation Service, other Federal agencies, and 
State and local officials.''.
    SEC. 556. NORTH PADRE ISLAND STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION AND 
      ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION PROJECT.
    The Secretary is directed to carry out a project for ecosystem 
restoration and storm damage reduction at North Padre Island, Corpus 
Christi Bay, Texas, at a total estimated cost of $30,000,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $19,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $10,500,000, if the Secretary determines that the work is 
technically sound and environmentally acceptable. The Secretary shall 
make such a determination not later than 270 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act.

SEC. 557. NORTHERN WEST VIRGINIA.

    The projects described in the following reports are authorized to 
be carried out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with the 
plans, and subject to the conditions, recommended in the reports, and 
subject to a favorable report of the Chief of Engineers:
        (1) Parkersburg, west virginia.--Report of the Corps of 
    Engineers entitled ``Parkersburg/Vienna Riverfront Park Feasibility 
    Study'', dated June 1998, at a total cost of $8,400,000, with an 
    estimated Federal cost of $4,200,000, and an estimated non-Federal 
    cost of $4,200,000.
        (2) Weirton, west virginia.--Report of the Corps of Engineers 
    entitled ``Feasibility Master Plan for Weirton Port and Industrial 
    Center, West Virginia Public Port Authority'', dated December 1997, 
    at a total cost of $18,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
    $9,000,000, and an estimated non-Federal cost of $9,000,000.
        (3) Erickson/wood county, west virginia.--Report of the Corps 
    of Engineers entitled ``Feasibility Master Plan for Erickson/Wood 
    County Port District, West Virginia Public Port Authority'', dated 
    July 7, 1997, at a total cost of $28,000,000, with an estimated 
    Federal cost of $14,000,000, and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
    $14,000,000.

SEC. 558. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION.

    Section 8 of the Act of May 15, 1928 (33 U.S.C. 702h; 45 Stat. 537, 
chapter 569) (commonly known as the ``Flood Control Act of 1928''), is 
amended by striking ``$7,500'' and inserting ``$21,500''.

SEC. 559. COASTAL AQUATIC HABITAT MANAGEMENT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may cooperate with the Secretaries 
of Agriculture and the Interior, the Administrators of the 
Environmental Protection Agency and the National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration, other appropriate Federal, State, and local 
agencies, and affected private entities, in the development of a 
management strategy to address problems associated with toxic 
microorganisms and the resulting degradation of ecosystems in the tidal 
and nontidal wetlands and waters of the United States.
    (b) Assistance.--As part of the management strategy, the Secretary 
may provide planning, design, and other technical assistance to each 
participating State in the development and implementation of 
nonregulatory measures to mitigate environmental problems and restore 
aquatic resources.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--The Federal share of the cost of measures 
undertaken under this section shall not exceed 65 percent.
    (d) Operation and Maintenance.--The non-Federal share of operation 
and maintenance costs for projects constructed with assistance provided 
under this section shall be 100 percent.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $7,000,000 for the period 
beginning with fiscal year 2000.

SEC. 560. ABANDONED AND INACTIVE NONCOAL MINE RESTORATION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide technical, planning, and 
design assistance to Federal and non-Federal interests for carrying out 
projects to address water quality problems caused by drainage and 
related activities from abandoned and inactive noncoal mines.
    (b) Specific Measures.--Assistance provided under subsection (a) 
may be in support of projects for the purposes of--
        (1) managing drainage from abandoned and inactive noncoal 
    mines;
        (2) restoring and protecting streams, rivers, wetlands, other 
    waterbodies, and riparian areas degraded by drainage from abandoned 
    and inactive noncoal mines; and
        (3) demonstrating management practices and innovative and 
    alternative treatment technologies to minimize or eliminate adverse 
    environmental effects associated with drainage from abandoned and 
    inactive noncoal mines.
    (c) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
assistance under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent, except that the 
Federal share with respect to projects located on land owned by the 
United States shall be 100 percent.
    (d) Effect on Authority of Secretary of the Interior.--Nothing in 
this section affects the authority of the Secretary of the Interior 
under title IV of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 
1977 (30 U.S.C. 1231 et seq.).
    (e) Technology Database for Reclamation of Abandoned Mines.--The 
Secretary may provide assistance to non-Federal and nonprofit entities 
to develop, manage, and maintain a database of conventional and 
innovative, cost-effective technologies for reclamation of abandoned 
and inactive noncoal mine sites. Such assistance shall be provided 
through the Rehabilitation of Abandoned Mine Sites Program managed by 
the Sacramento District Office of the Corps of Engineers.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000.

SEC. 561. BENEFICIAL USE OF WASTE TIRE RUBBER.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall, when appropriate, encourage 
the beneficial use of waste tire rubber (including crumb rubber and 
baled tire products) recycled from tires.
    (b) Included Beneficial Uses.--Beneficial uses under subsection (a) 
may include marine pilings, underwater framing, floating docks with 
built-in flotation, utility poles, and other uses associated with 
transportation and infrastructure projects receiving Federal funds.
    (c) Use of Waste Tire Rubber.--The Secretary shall encourage the 
use, when appropriate, of waste tire rubber (including crumb rubber) in 
projects described in subsection (b).

SEC. 562. SITE DESIGNATION.

    Section 102(c)(4) of the Marine Protection, Research, and 
Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1412(c)(4)) is amended in the third 
sentence by striking ``January 1, 2000'' and inserting ``January 1, 
2003''.

SEC. 563. LAND CONVEYANCES.

    (a) Toronto Lake and El Dorado Lake, Kansas.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the State of 
    Kansas, by quitclaim deed and without consideration, all right, 
    title, and interest of the United States in and to the 2 parcels of 
    land described in paragraph (2) on which correctional facilities 
    operated by the Kansas Department of Corrections are situated.
        (2) Land description.--The parcels of land referred to in 
    paragraph (1) are--
            (A) the parcel located in Butler County, Kansas, adjacent 
        to the El Dorado Lake Project, consisting of approximately 
        32.98 acres; and
            (B) the parcel located in Woodson County, Kansas, adjacent 
        to the Toronto Lake Project, consisting of approximately 51.98 
        acres.
        (3) Conditions.--
            (A) Use of land.--A conveyance of a parcel under paragraph 
        (1) shall be subject to the condition that all right, title, 
        and interest in and to the parcel shall revert to the United 
        States if the parcel is used for a purpose other than that of a 
        correctional facility.
            (B) Costs.--The Secretary may require such additional 
        terms, conditions, reservations, and restrictions in connection 
        with the conveyance as the Secretary determines are necessary 
        to protect the interests of the United States, including a 
        requirement that the State pay all reasonable administrative 
        costs associated with the conveyance.
    (b) Pike County, Missouri.--
        (1) Land exchange.--Subject to paragraphs (3) and (4), at such 
    time as Holnam Inc. conveys all right, title, and interest in and 
    to the parcel of land described in paragraph (2)(A) to the United 
    States, the Secretary shall convey all right, title, and interest 
    in the parcel of land described in paragraph (2)(B) to Holnam Inc.
        (2) Land description.--The parcels of land referred to in 
    paragraph (1) are the following:
            (A) Non-federal land.--152.45 acres with existing flowage 
        easements situated in Pike County, Missouri, described as a 
        portion of Government Tract Number FM-9 and all of Government 
        Tract Numbers FM-11, FM-10, FM-12, FM-13, and FM-16, owned and 
        administered by Holnam Inc.
            (B) Federal land.--152.61 acres situated in Pike County, 
        Missouri, known as Government Tract Numbers FM-17 and a portion 
        of FM-18, administered by the Corps of Engineers.
        (3) Conditions.--The exchange of land under paragraph (1) shall 
    be subject to the following conditions:
            (A) Deeds.--
                (i) Non-federal land.--The conveyance of the land 
            described in paragraph (2)(A) to the Secretary shall be by 
            a warranty deed acceptable to the Secretary.
                (ii) Federal land.--The instrument of conveyance used 
            to convey the land described in paragraph (2)(B) to Holnam 
            Inc. shall contain such reservations, terms, and conditions 
            as the Secretary considers necessary to allow the United 
            States to operate and maintain the Mississippi River 9-Foot 
            Navigation Project.
            (B) Removal of improvements.--Holnam Inc. may remove any 
        improvements on the land described in paragraph (2)(A). The 
        Secretary may require Holnam Inc. to remove any improvements on 
        the land described in paragraph (2)(A). In either case, Holnam 
        Inc. shall hold the United States harmless from liability, and 
        the United States shall not incur cost associated with the 
        removal or relocation of any of the improvements.
            (C) Time limit for exchange.--The land exchange under 
        paragraph (1) shall be completed not later than 2 years after 
        the date of enactment of this Act.
            (D) Legal description.--The Secretary shall provide the 
        legal description of the land described in paragraph (2). The 
        legal description shall be used in the instruments of 
        conveyance of the land.
            (E) Administrative costs.--The Secretary shall require 
        Holnam Inc. to pay reasonable administrative costs associated 
        with the exchange.
        (4) Value of properties.--If the appraised fair market value, 
    as determined by the Secretary, of the land conveyed to Holnam Inc. 
    by the Secretary under paragraph (1) exceeds the appraised fair 
    market value, as determined by the Secretary, of the land conveyed 
    to the United States by Holnam Inc. under paragraph (1), Holnam 
    Inc. shall make a payment equal to the excess in cash or a cash 
    equivalent to the United States.
    (c) Candy Lake Project, Osage County, Oklahoma.--
        (1) Definitions.--In this subsection:
            (A) Fair market value.--The term ``fair market value'' 
        means the amount for which a willing buyer would purchase and a 
        willing seller would sell a parcel of land, as determined by a 
        qualified, independent land appraiser.
            (B) Previous owner of land.--The term ``previous owner of 
        land'' means a person (including a corporation) that conveyed, 
        or a descendant of a deceased individual who conveyed, land to 
        the Corps of Engineers for use in the Candy Lake project in 
        Osage County, Oklahoma.
        (2) Conveyances.--
            (A) In general.--The Secretary shall convey all right, 
        title, and interest of the United States in and to the land 
        acquired by the United States for the Candy Lake project in 
        Osage County, Oklahoma.
            (B) Previous owners of land.--
                (i) In general.--The Secretary shall give a previous 
            owner of land the first option to purchase the land 
            described in subparagraph (A).
                (ii) Application.--

                    (I) In general.--A previous owner of land that 
                desires to purchase the land described in paragraph (1) 
                that was owned by the previous owner of land, or by the 
                individual from whom the previous owner of land is 
                descended, shall file an application to purchase the 
                land with the Secretary not later than 180 days after 
                the official date of notice to the previous owner of 
                land under paragraph (3).
                    (II) First to file has first option.--If more than 
                1 application is filed to purchase a parcel of land 
                described in subparagraph (A), the first option to 
                purchase the parcel of land shall be determined in the 
                order in which applications for the parcel of land were 
                filed.

                (iii) Identification of previous owners of land.--As 
            soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this 
            Act, the Secretary shall, to the extent practicable, 
            identify each previous owner of land.
                (iv) Consideration.--Consideration for land conveyed 
            under this subsection shall be the fair market value of the 
            land.
            (C) Disposal.--Any land described in subparagraph (A) for 
        which an application to purchase the land has not been filed 
        under subparagraph (B)(ii) within the applicable time period 
        shall be disposed of in accordance with law.
            (D) Extinguishment of easements.--All flowage easements 
        acquired by the United States for use in the Candy Lake project 
        in Osage County, Oklahoma, are extinguished.
        (3) Notice.--
            (A) In general.--The Secretary shall notify--
                (i) each person identified as a previous owner of land 
            under paragraph (2)(B)(iii), not later than 90 days after 
            identification, by United States mail; and
                (ii) the general public, not later than 90 days after 
            the date of enactment of this Act, by publication in the 
            Federal Register.
            (B) Contents of notice.--Notice under this paragraph shall 
        include--
                (i) a copy of this subsection;
                (ii) information sufficient to separately identify each 
            parcel of land subject to this subsection; and
                (iii) specification of the fair market value of each 
            parcel of land subject to this subsection.
            (C) Official date of notice.--The official date of notice 
        under this subsection shall be the later of--
                (i) the date on which actual notice is mailed; or
                (ii) the date of publication of the notice in the 
            Federal Register.
    (d) Lake Hugo, Oklahoma, Area Land Conveyance.--
        (1) In general.--As soon as practicable after the date of 
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall convey at fair market 
    value to Choctaw County Industrial Authority, Oklahoma, the parcels 
    of land described in paragraph (2).
        (2) Land description.--
            (A) In general.--The parcel of land to be conveyed under 
        paragraph (1) is the parcel lying above elevation 445.2 feet 
        (NGVD) located in the S\1/2\N\1/2\SE\1/4\ and the S\1/2\SW\1/4\ 
        of Section 13 and the N\1/2\NW\1/4\ of Section 24, T 6 S, R 18 
        E, of the Indian Meridian, in Choctaw County, Oklahoma, the 
        parcel also being part of the Sawyer Bluff Public Use Area and 
        including parts of Hugo Lake Tracts 134 and 139, and more 
        particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the 
        east line of Section 13, the point being 100.00 feet north of 
        the southeast corner of S\1/2\N\1/2\SE\1/4\ of Section 13; 
        thence S 01+ 36, 24" 100.00 to a Corps of Engineers brass-
        capped monument at the southeast corner of S\1/2\N\1/2\SE\1/4\ 
        of Section 13; thence S 88+ 16, 57" W, along the south line of 
        the S\1/2\N\1/2\SE\1/4\ of Section 13, 2649.493 feet, more or 
        less, to a Corps of Engineers brass-capped monument on the 
        centerline of Section 13; thence S 01+ 20, 53" E, along the 
        centerline of Section 13, 1316.632 feet to a Corps of Engineers 
        brass-capped monument; thence S 00+ 41, 35" E, along the 
        centerline of Section 24, 1000.00 feet, more or less, to a 
        point lying 50.00 feet north and 300.00 feet, more or less, 
        east of Road B of the Sawyer Bluff Public Use Area; thence 
        westerly and northwesterly, parallel to Road B, to the 
        approximate location of the 445.2-foot contour; thence 
        meandering northerly along the 445.2-foot contour to a point 
        approximately 100.00 feet west and 100.00 feet north of the 
        southwest corner of the S\1/2\N\1/2\SE\1/4\ of Section 13; 
        thence east, paralleling the south line of the S\1/2\N\1/
        2\SE\1/4\ of Section 13, 2649.493 feet, more or less, to the 
        point of beginning.
            (B) Survey.--The exact description and acreage of the 
        parcel shall be determined by a metes and bounds survey 
        provided by the Choctaw County Industrial Authority.
    (e) Conveyance of Property in Marshall County, Oklahoma.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the State of 
    Oklahoma all right, title, and interest of the United States in and 
    to real property located in Marshall County, Oklahoma, and included 
    in the Lake Texoma (Denison Dam), Oklahoma and Texas, project, 
    consisting of approximately 1,580 acres and leased to the State of 
    Oklahoma for public park and recreation purposes.
        (2) Consideration.--Consideration for the conveyance under 
    paragraph (1) shall be the fair market value of the real property, 
    as determined by the Secretary. All costs associated with the 
    conveyance under paragraph (1) shall be paid by the State of 
    Oklahoma.
        (3) Description.--The exact acreage and legal description of 
    the real property to be conveyed under paragraph (1) shall be 
    determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary. The cost of 
    the survey shall be paid by the State of Oklahoma.
        (4) Environmental compliance.--Before making the conveyance 
    under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall--
            (A) conduct an environmental baseline survey to determine 
        whether there are levels of contamination for which the United 
        States would be responsible under the Comprehensive 
        Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 
        (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.); and
            (B) ensure that the conveyance complies with the National 
        Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
        (5) Other terms and conditions.--The conveyance under paragraph 
    (1) shall be subject to such other terms and conditions as the 
    Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the 
    United States, including reservation by the United States of a 
    flowage easement over all portions of the real property to be 
    conveyed that are at or below elevation 645.0 NGVD.
    (f) Summerfield Cemetery Association, Oklahoma.--
        (1) In general.--As soon as practicable after the date of 
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transfer to the 
    Summerfield Cemetery Association, Oklahoma, all right, title, and 
    interest of the United States in and to the land described in 
    paragraph (3) for use as a cemetery.
        (2) Reversion.--If the land to be transferred under this 
    subsection ever ceases to be used as a not-for-profit cemetery or 
    for another public purpose, the land shall revert to the United 
    States.
        (3) Description.--The land to be conveyed under this subsection 
    is the approximately 10 acres of land located in Leflore County, 
    Oklahoma, and described as follows:


                          indian basin meridian

              Section 23, Township 5 North, Range 23 East

        SW SE SW NW
        NW NE NW SW
        N\1/2\ SW SW NW.
        (4) Consideration.--The conveyance under this subsection shall 
    be without consideration. All costs associated with the conveyance 
    shall be paid by the Summerfield Cemetery Association, Oklahoma.
        (5) Other terms and conditions.--The conveyance under this 
    subsection shall be subject to such other terms and conditions as 
    the Secretary considers necessary to protect the interests of the 
    United States.
    (g) Dexter, Oregon.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the Dexter 
    Sanitary District all right, title, and interest of the United 
    States in and to a parcel of land consisting of approximately 5 
    acres located at Dexter Lake, Oregon, under lease to the Dexter 
    Sanitary District.
        (2) Consideration.--Land to be conveyed under this subsection 
    shall be conveyed without consideration. If the land is no longer 
    held in public ownership or no longer used for wastewater treatment 
    purposes, title to the land shall revert to the Secretary.
        (3) Terms and conditions.--The conveyance by the United States 
    shall be subject to such terms and conditions as the Secretary 
    considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United 
    States.
        (4) Surveys.--The exact acreage and description of the land to 
    be conveyed under paragraph (1) shall be determined by such surveys 
    as the Secretary considers necessary. The cost of the surveys shall 
    be borne by the Dexter Sanitary District.
    (h) Charleston, South Carolina.--The Secretary may convey the 
property of the Corps of Engineers known as the ``Equipment and Storage 
Yard'', located on Meeting Street in Charleston, South Carolina, in as-
is condition for fair market value, with all proceeds from the 
conveyance to be applied by the Corps of Engineers, Charleston 
District, to offset a portion of the costs of moving or leasing an 
office facility in the city of Charleston, South Carolina.
    (i) Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, South Carolina.--
        (1) In general.--Except as otherwise provided in this 
    subsection, the Secretary shall convey to the State of South 
    Carolina all right, title, and interest of the United States in and 
    to the parcels of land described in paragraph (2)(A) that are being 
    managed, as of the date of enactment of this Act, by the South 
    Carolina Department of Natural Resources for fish and wildlife 
    mitigation purposes for the Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, South 
    Carolina, project authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control 
    Act of 1966 (80 Stat. 1420) and modified by section 601(a) of the 
    Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4140).
        (2) Land description.--
            (A) In general.--The parcels of land to be conveyed are 
        described in Exhibits A, F, and H of Army Lease No. DACW21-1-
        93-0910 and associated supplemental agreements or are 
        designated in red in Exhibit A of Army License No. DACW21-3-85-
        1904, excluding all designated parcels in the license that are 
        below elevation 346 feet mean sea level or that are less than 
        300 feet measured horizontally from the top of the power pool.
            (B) Management of excluded parcels.--Management of the 
        excluded parcels shall continue in accordance with the terms of 
        Army License No. DACW21-3-85-1904 until the Secretary and the 
        State enter into an agreement under paragraph (6).
            (C) Survey.--The exact acreage and legal description of the 
        land shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the 
        Secretary, with the cost of the survey borne by the State.
        (3) Costs of conveyance.--The State shall be responsible for 
    all costs, including real estate transaction and environmental 
    compliance costs, associated with the conveyance.
        (4) Perpetual status.--
            (A) In general.--All land conveyed under this subsection 
        shall be retained in public ownership and shall be managed in 
        perpetuity for fish and wildlife mitigation purposes in 
        accordance with a plan approved by the Secretary.
            (B) Reversion.--If any parcel of land is not managed for 
        fish and wildlife mitigation purposes in accordance with the 
        plan, title to the parcel shall revert to the United States.
        (5) Additional terms and conditions.--The Secretary may require 
    such additional terms and conditions in connection with the 
    conveyance under this subsection as the Secretary considers 
    appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.
        (6) Fish and wildlife mitigation agreement.--
            (A) In general.--The Secretary may pay the State of South 
        Carolina not more than $4,850,000, subject to the Secretary and 
        the State entering into a binding agreement for the State to 
        manage for fish and wildlife mitigation purposes in perpetuity 
        the parcels of land conveyed under this subsection and excluded 
        parcels designated in Exhibit A of Army License No. DACW21-3-
        85-1904.
            (B) Failure of performance.--The agreement shall specify 
        the terms and conditions under which payment will be made and 
        the rights of, and remedies available to, the Federal 
        Government to recover all or a portion of the payment if the 
        State fails to manage any parcel in a manner satisfactory to 
        the Secretary.
    (j) Clarkston, Washington.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the Port of 
    Clarkston, Washington, all right, title, and interest of the United 
    States in and to a portion of the land described in the Department 
    of the Army Lease No. DACW68-1-97-22, consisting of approximately 
    31 acres, the exact boundaries of which shall be determined by the 
    Secretary and the Port of Clarkston.
        (2) Additional land.--The Secretary may convey to the Port of 
    Clarkston, Washington, such additional land located in the vicinity 
    of Clarkston, Washington, as the Secretary determines to be excess 
    to the needs of the Columbia River Project and appropriate for 
    conveyance.
        (3) Terms and conditions.--The conveyances made under 
    paragraphs (1) and (2) shall be subject to such terms and 
    conditions as the Secretary considers necessary to protect the 
    interests of the United States, including a requirement that the 
    Port of Clarkston pay all administrative costs associated with the 
    conveyances, including the cost of land surveys and appraisals and 
    costs associated with compliance with applicable environmental laws 
    (including regulations).
        (4) Use of land.--The Port of Clarkston shall be required to 
    pay the fair market value, as determined by the Secretary, of any 
    land conveyed under paragraphs (1) and (2) that is not retained in 
    public ownership and used for public park or recreation purposes, 
    except that the Secretary shall have a right of reverter to reclaim 
    possession and title to any such land.
    (k) Matewan, West Virginia.--
        (1) In general.--The United States shall convey by quitclaim 
    deed to the town of Matewan, West Virginia, all right, title, and 
    interest of the United States in and to 4 parcels of land that the 
    Secretary determines to be excess to the structural project for 
    flood control constructed by the Corps of Engineers along the Tug 
    Fork River under section 202 of the Energy and Water Development 
    Appropriation Act, 1981 (94 Stat. 1339).
        (2) Property description.--The parcels of land referred to in 
    paragraph (1) are as follows:
            (A) A certain parcel of land in the State of West Virginia, 
        Mingo County, town of Matewan, being more particularly bounded 
        and described as follows:
                Beginning at a point on the southerly right-of-way line 
            of a 40-foot-wide street right-of-way (known as McCoy 
            Alley), having an approximate coordinate value of N228,695, 
            E1,662,397, in the line common to the land designated as 
            U.S.A. Tract No. 834, and the land designated as U.S.A. 
            Tract No. 837, said point being South 51+52, East 81.8 feet 
            from an iron pin and cap marked M-12 on the boundary of the 
            Matewan Area Structural Project, on the north right-of-way 
            line of said street, at a corner common to designated 
            U.S.A. Tracts Nos. 834 and 836; thence, leaving the right-
            of-way of said street, with the line common to the land of 
            said Tract No. 834, and the land of said Tract No. 837.
                South 14+37, West 46 feet to the corner common to the 
            land of said Tract No. 834, and the land of said Tract No. 
            837; thence, leaving the land of said Tract No. 837, 
            severing the lands of said Project.
                South 14+37, West 46 feet.
                South 68+07, East 239 feet.
                North 26+05, East 95 feet to a point on the southerly 
            right-of-way line of said street; thence, with the right-
            of-way of said street, continuing to sever the lands of 
            said Project.
                South 63+55, East 206 feet; thence, leaving the right-
            of-way of said street, continuing to sever the lands of 
            said Project.
                South 26+16, West 63 feet; thence, with a curve to the 
            left having a radius of 70 feet, a delta of 33+58,, an arc 
            length of 41 feet, the chord bearing.
                South 09+17, West 41 feet; thence, leaving said curve, 
            continuing to sever the lands of said Project.
                South 07+42, East 31 feet to a point on the right-of-
            way line of the floodwall; thence, with the right-of-way of 
            said floodwall, continuing to sever the lands of said 
            Project.
                South 77+04, West 71 feet.
                North 77+10, West 46 feet.
                North 67+07, West 254 feet.
                North 67+54, West 507 feet.
                North 57+49, West 66 feet to the intersection of the 
            right-of-way line of said floodwall with the southerly 
            right-of-way line of said street; thence, leaving the 
            right-of-way of said floodwall and with the southerly 
            right-of-way of said street, continuing to sever the lands 
            of said Project.
                North 83+01, East 171 feet.
                North 89+42, East 74 feet.
                South 83+39, East 168 feet.
                South 83+38, East 41 feet.
                South 77+26, East 28 feet to the point of beginning, 
            containing 2.59 acres, more or less.
        The bearings and coordinate used in this subparagraph are 
        referenced to the West Virginia State Plane Coordinate System, 
        South Zone.
            (B) A certain parcel of land in the State of West Virginia, 
        Mingo County, town of Matewan, being more particularly bounded 
        and described as follows:
                Beginning at an iron pin and cap designated Corner No. 
            M2-2 on the southerly right-of-way line of the Norfolk and 
            Western Railroad, having an approximate coordinate value of 
            N228,755 E1,661,242, and being at the intersection of the 
            right-of-way line of the floodwall with the boundary of the 
            Matewan Area Structural Project; thence, leaving the right-
            of-way of said floodwall and with said Project boundary, 
            and the southerly right-of-way of said Railroad.
                North 59+45, East 34 feet.
                North 69+50, East 44 feet.
                North 58+11, East 79 feet.
                North 66+13, East 102 feet.
                North 69+43, East 98 feet.
                North 77+39, East 18 feet.
                North 72+39, East 13 feet to a point at the 
            intersection of said Project boundary, and the southerly 
            right-of-way of said Railroad, with the westerly right-of-
            way line of State Route 49/10; thence, leaving said Project 
            boundary, and the southerly right-of-way of said Railroad, 
            and with the westerly right-of-way of said road.
                South 03+21, East 100 feet to a point at the 
            intersection of the westerly right-of-way of said road with 
            the right-of-way of said floodwall; thence, leaving the 
            right-of-way of said road, and with the right-of-way line 
            of said floodwall.
                South 79+30, West 69 feet.
                South 78+28, West 222 feet.
                South 80+11, West 65 feet.
                North 38+40, West 14 feet to the point of beginning, 
            containing 0.53 acre, more or less.
        The bearings and coordinate used in this subparagraph are 
        referenced to the West Virginia State Plane Coordinate System, 
        South Zone.
            (C) A certain parcel of land in the State of West Virginia, 
        Mingo County, town of Matewan, being more particularly bounded 
        and described as follows:
                Beginning at a point on the southerly right-of-way line 
            of the Norfolk and Western Railroad, having an approximate 
            coordinate value of N228,936 E1,661,672, and being at the 
            intersection of the easterly right-of-way line of State 
            Route 49/10 with the boundary of the Matewan Area 
            Structural Project; thence, leaving the right-of-way of 
            said road, and with said Project boundary, and the 
            southerly right-of-way of said Railroad.
                North 77+49, East 89 feet to an iron pin and cap 
            designated as U.S.A. Corner No. M-4.
                North 79+30, East 74 feet to an iron pin and cap 
            designated as U.S.A. Corner No. M-5-1; thence, leaving the 
            southerly right-of-way of said Railroad, and continuing 
            with the boundary of said Project.
                South 06+33, East 102 to an iron pipe and cap 
            designated U.S.A. Corner No. M-6-1 on the northerly right-
            of-way line of State Route 49/28; thence, leaving the 
            boundary of said Project, and with the right-of-way of said 
            road, severing the lands of said Project.
                North 80+59, West 171 feet to a point at the 
            intersection of the northerly right-of-way line of said 
            State Route 49/28 with the easterly right-of-way line of 
            said State Route 49/10; thence, leaving the right-of-way of 
            said State Route 49/28 and with the right-of-way of said 
            State Route 49/10.
                North 03+21, West 42 feet to the point of beginning, 
            containing 0.27 acre, more or less.
        The bearings and coordinate used in this subparagraph are 
        referenced to the West Virginia State Plane Coordinate System, 
        South Zone.
            (D) A certain parcel of land in the State of West Virginia, 
        Mingo County, town of Matewan, being more particularly bounded 
        and described as follows:
                Beginning at a point at the intersection of the 
            easterly right-of-way line of State Route 49/10 with the 
            right-of-way line of the floodwall, having an approximate 
            coordinate value of N228,826 E1,661,679; thence, leaving 
            the right-of-way of said floodwall, and with the right-of-
            way of said State Route 49/10.
                North 03+21, West 23 feet to a point at the 
            intersection of the easterly right-of-way line of said 
            State Route 49/10 with the southerly right-of-way line of 
            State Route 49/28; thence, leaving the right-of-way of said 
            State Route 49/10 and with the right-of-way of said State 
            Route 49/28.
                South 80+59, East 168 feet.
                North 82+28, East 45 feet to an iron pin and cap 
            designated as U.S.A. Corner No. M-8-1 on the boundary of 
            the Western Area Structural Project; thence, leaving the 
            right-of-way of said State Route 49/28, and with said 
            Project boundary.
                South 08+28, East 88 feet to an iron pin and cap 
            designated as U.S.A. Corner No. M-9-1 point on the 
            northerly right-of-way line of a street (known as McCoy 
            Alley); thence, leaving said Project boundary and with the 
            northerly right-of-way of said street.
                South 83+01, West 38 feet to a point on the right-of-
            way line of said floodwall; thence, leaving the right-of-
            way of said street, and with the right-of-way of said 
            floodwall.
                North 57+49, West 180 feet.
                South 79+30, West 34 feet to a point of beginning, 
            containing 0.24 acre, more or less.
        The bearings and coordinate used in this subparagraph are 
        referenced to the West Virginia State Plane Coordinate System, 
        South Zone.
    (l) McNary National Wildlife Refuge.--
        (1) Transfer of administrative jurisdiction.--Administrative 
    jurisdiction over the McNary National Wildlife Refuge is 
    transferred from the Secretary to the Secretary of the Interior.
        (2) Land exchange with the port of walla walla, washington.--
            (A) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior may 
        exchange approximately 188 acres of land located south of 
        Highway 12 and comprising a portion of the McNary National 
        Wildlife Refuge for approximately 122 acres of land owned by 
        the Port of Walla Walla, Washington, and located at the 
        confluence of the Snake River and the Columbia River.
            (B) Terms and conditions.--The land exchange under 
        subparagraph (A) shall be carried out in accordance with such 
        terms and conditions as the Secretary of the Interior 
        determines to be necessary to protect the interests of the 
        United States, including a requirement that the Port pay--
                (i) reasonable administrative costs (not to exceed 
            $50,000) associated with the exchange; and
                (ii) any excess (as determined by the Secretary of the 
            Interior) of the fair market value of the parcel conveyed 
            by the Secretary of the Interior over the fair market value 
            of the parcel conveyed by the Port.
            (C) Use of funds.--The Secretary of the Interior may retain 
        any funds received under subparagraph (B)(ii) and, without 
        further Act of appropriation, may use the funds to acquire 
        replacement habitat for the Mid-Columbia River National 
        Wildlife Refuge Complex.
        (3) Management.--The McNary National Wildlife Refuge and land 
    conveyed by the Port of Walla Walla, Washington, under paragraph 
    (2) shall be managed in accordance with applicable laws, including 
    section 120(h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
    Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9620(h)) and the 
    National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).

SEC. 564. MCNARY POOL, WASHINGTON.

    (a) Extinguishment of Reversionary Interests and Use 
Restrictions.--With respect to each deed listed in subsection (b)--
        (1) the reversionary interests and the use restrictions 
    relating to port or industrial purposes are extinguished;
        (2) the human habitation or other building structure use 
    restriction is extinguished in each area where the elevation is 
    above the standard project flood elevation; and
        (3) the use of fill material to raise low areas above the 
    standard project flood elevation is authorized, except in any low 
    area constituting wetland for which a permit under section 404 of 
    the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344) would be 
    required.
    (b) Affected Deeds.--The deeds with the following county auditor's 
file numbers are referred to in subsection (a):
        (1) Auditor's File Numbers 521608 and 529071 of Benton County, 
    Washington.
        (2) Auditor's File Numbers 262980, 263334, 318437, and 404398 
    of Franklin County, Washington.
        (3) Auditor's File Numbers 411133, 447417, 447418, 462156, 
    563333, and 569593 of Walla Walla County, Washington.
        (4) Auditor's File Number 285215 of Umatilla County, Oregon, 
    executed by the United States.
    (c) No Effect on Other Rights.--Nothing in this section affects the 
remaining rights and interests of the Corps of Engineers for authorized 
project purposes.

SEC. 565. NAMINGS.

    (a) Francis Bland Floodway Ditch, Arkansas.--
        (1) Designation.--8-Mile Creek in Paragould, Arkansas, shall be 
    known and designated as the ``Francis Bland Floodway Ditch''.
        (2) Legal reference.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 
    document, paper, or other record of the United States to the creek 
    referred to in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be a reference to 
    the ``Francis Bland Floodway Ditch''.
    (b) Lawrence Blackwell Memorial Bridge, Arkansas.--
        (1) Designation.--The bridge over lock and dam numbered 4 on 
    the Arkansas River, Arkansas, constructed as part of the project 
    for navigation on the Arkansas River and tributaries, shall be 
    known and designated as the ``Lawrence Blackwell Memorial Bridge''.
        (2) Legal reference.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 
    document, paper, or other record of the United States to the bridge 
    referred to in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be a reference to 
    the ``Lawrence Blackwell Memorial Bridge''.
    (c) John H. Chafee National Wildlife Refuge.--Title II of Public 
Law 100-610 (16 U.S.C. 668dd note; 102 Stat. 3176) is amended--
        (1) in the title heading, by striking ``PETTAQUAMSCUTT COVE'' 
    and inserting ``JOHN H. CHAFEE'';
        (2) in section 201--
            (A) in paragraph (3), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (B) in paragraph (4), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (C) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(5) John H. Chafee has been a steadfast champion for the 
    conservation of fish, wildlife, and natural resources throughout a 
    distinguished career of public service to the people of Rhode 
    Island and the United States.'';
        (3) in section 202, by striking ``Pettaquamscutt Cove'' and 
    inserting ``John H. Chafee''; and
        (4) in section 203(1), by striking ``Pettaquamscutt Cove'' and 
    inserting ``John H. Chafee''.
    SEC. 566. FOLSOM DAM AND RESERVOIR ADDITIONAL STORAGE AND 
      ADDITIONAL FLOOD CONTROL STUDIES.
    (a) Folsom Flood Control Studies.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the State 
    of California and local water resources agencies, shall undertake a 
    study of increasing surcharge flood control storage at the Folsom 
    Dam and Reservoir.
        (2) Limitations.--The study of the Folsom Dam and Reservoir 
    undertaken under paragraph (1) shall assume that there is to be no 
    increase in conservation storage at the Folsom Reservoir.
        (3) Report.--Not later than March 1, 2000, the Secretary shall 
    transmit to Congress a report on the results of the study under 
    this subsection.
    (b) American and Sacramento Rivers Flood Control Study.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary shall undertake a study of all 
    levees on the American River and on the Sacramento River downstream 
    and immediately upstream of the confluence of such Rivers to access 
    opportunities to increase potential flood protection through levee 
    modifications.
        (2) Deadline for completion.--Not later than March 1, 2000, the 
    Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the results of the 
    study undertaken under this subsection.

SEC. 567. WALLOPS ISLAND, VIRGINIA.

    (a) Emergency Action.--The Secretary shall take emergency action to 
protect Wallops Island, Virginia, from damaging coastal storms, by 
improving and extending the existing seawall, replenishing and 
renourishing the beach, and constructing protective dunes.
    (b) Reimbursement.--The Secretary may seek reimbursement from other 
Federal agencies whose resources are protected by the emergency action 
taken under subsection (a).
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $8,000,000.

SEC. 568. DETROIT RIVER, MICHIGAN.

    (a) Greenway Corridor Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study 
to determine the feasibility of a project for shoreline protection, 
frontal erosion, and associated purposes in the Detroit River shoreline 
area from the Belle Isle Bridge to the Ambassador Bridge in Detroit, 
Michigan.
    (b) Potential Modifications.--As part of the study, the Secretary 
shall review potential project modifications to any Corps of Engineers 
project within the Detroit River shoreline area.
    (c) Repair and Rehabilitation.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary may repair and rehabilitate the 
    seawalls on the Detroit River in Detroit, Michigan, if the 
    Secretary determines that such work is technically sound, 
    environmentally acceptable, and economically justified.
        (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
    appropriated to carry out paragraph (1) $1,000,000 for the period 
    beginning with fiscal year 2000.

SEC. 569. NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTA.

    (a) Definition of Northeastern Minnesota.--In this section, the 
term ``northeastern Minnesota'' means the counties of Cook, Lake, St. 
Louis, Koochiching, Itasca, Cass, Crow Wing, Aitkin, Carlton, Pine, 
Kanabec, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Benton, Sherburne, Isanti, and Chisago, 
Minnesota.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a pilot 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
northeastern Minnesota.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may be in 
the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in northeastern Minnesota, including projects for wastewater 
treatment and related facilities, water supply and related facilities, 
environmental restoration, and surface water resource protection and 
development.
    (d) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
publicly owned.
    (e) Local Cooperation Agreement.--
        (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
    section, the Secretary shall enter into a local cooperation 
    agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
    construction of the project to be carried out with the assistance.
        (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered 
    into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
            (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
        with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
        or resource protection and development plan, including 
        appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
            (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
        such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
        ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by the 
        non-Federal interest.
        (3) Cost sharing.--
            (A) In general.--The Federal share of project costs under 
        each local cooperation agreement entered into under this 
        subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal share may be in the 
        form of grants or reimbursements of project costs.
            (B) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal interest shall 
        receive credit for the reasonable costs of design work 
        completed by the non-Federal interest before entering into a 
        local cooperation agreement with the Secretary for a project. 
        The credit for the design work shall not exceed 6 percent of 
        the total construction costs of the project.
            (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
        of the non-Federal share of the costs of a project that is the 
        subject of an agreement under this section, the non-Federal 
        interest shall receive credit for reasonable interest incurred 
        in providing the non-Federal share of the project's costs.
            (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The non-
        Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
        rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
        project costs (including all reasonable costs associated with 
        obtaining permits necessary for the construction, operation, 
        and maintenance of the project on publicly owned or controlled 
        land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total project costs.
            (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
        operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
        assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the applicability of any 
provision of Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a 
project to be carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2001, the Secretary shall 
submit to Congress a report on the results of the pilot program carried 
out under this section, including recommendations concerning whether 
the program should be implemented on a national basis.
    (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000 for the period 
beginning with fiscal year 2000, to remain available until expended.

SEC. 570. ALASKA.

    (a) Definition of Native Corporation.--In this section, the term 
``Native Corporation'' has the meaning given the term in section 3 of 
the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1602).
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a pilot 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
Alaska.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may be in 
the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in Alaska, including projects for wastewater treatment and 
related facilities, water supply and related facilities, and surface 
water resource protection and development.
    (d) Ownership Requirements.--The Secretary may provide assistance 
for a project under this section only if the project is publicly owned 
or is owned by a Native Corporation.
    (e) Local Cooperation Agreements.--
        (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
    section, the Secretary shall enter into a local cooperation 
    agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
    construction of the project to be carried out with the assistance.
        (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered 
    into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
            (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
        with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
        or resource protection and development plan, including 
        appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
            (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
        such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
        ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by the 
        non-Federal interest.
        (3) Cost sharing.--
            (A) In general.--The Federal share of the project costs 
        under each local cooperation agreement entered into under this 
        subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal share may be in the 
        form of grants or reimbursements of project costs.
            (B) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal interest shall 
        receive credit for the reasonable costs of design work 
        completed by the non-Federal interest before entering into a 
        local cooperation agreement with the Secretary for a project. 
        The credit for the design work shall not exceed 6 percent of 
        the total construction costs of the project.
            (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
        of the non-Federal share of a project that is the subject of an 
        agreement under this section, the non-Federal interest shall 
        receive credit for reasonable interest incurred in providing 
        the non-Federal share of the project's costs.
            (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The non-
        Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
        rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
        project costs (including all reasonable costs associated with 
        obtaining permits necessary for the construction, operation, 
        and maintenance of the project on publicly owned or controlled 
        land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total project costs.
            (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
        operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
        assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the applicability of any 
provision of Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a 
project to be carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2001, the Secretary shall 
submit to Congress a report on the results of the pilot program carried 
out under this section, including a recommendation concerning whether 
the program should be implemented on a national basis.
    (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $25,000,000 for the period 
beginning with fiscal year 2000, to remain available until expended.

SEC. 571. CENTRAL WEST VIRGINIA.

    (a) Definition of Central West Virginia.--In this section, the term 
``central West Virginia'' means the counties of Mason, Jackson, Putnam, 
Kanawha, Roane, Wirt, Calhoun, Clay, Nicholas, Braxton, Gilmer, Lewis, 
Upshur, Randolph, Pendleton, Hardy, Hampshire, Morgan, Berkeley, and 
Jefferson, West Virginia.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a pilot 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
central West Virginia.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may be in 
the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in central West Virginia, including projects for wastewater 
treatment and related facilities, water supply and related facilities, 
and surface water resource protection and development.
    (d) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
publicly owned.
    (e) Local Cooperation Agreements.--
        (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
    section, the Secretary shall enter into a local cooperation 
    agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
    construction of the project to be carried out with the assistance.
        (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered 
    into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
            (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
        with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
        or resource protection and development plan, including 
        appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
            (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
        such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
        ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by the 
        non-Federal interest.
        (3) Cost sharing.--
            (A) In general.--The Federal share of the project costs 
        under each local cooperation agreement entered into under this 
        subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal share may be in the 
        form of grants or reimbursements of project costs.
            (B) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal interest shall 
        receive credit for the reasonable costs of design work 
        completed by the non-Federal interest before entering into a 
        local cooperation agreement with the Secretary for a project. 
        The credit for the design work shall not exceed 6 percent of 
        the total construction costs of the project.
            (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
        of the non-Federal share of a project that is the subject of an 
        agreement under this section, the non-Federal interest shall 
        receive credit for reasonable interest incurred in providing 
        the non-Federal share of the project's costs.
            (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The non-
        Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
        rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
        project costs (including all reasonable costs associated with 
        obtaining permits necessary for the construction, operation, 
        and maintenance of the project on publicly owned or controlled 
        land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total project costs.
            (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
        operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
        assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the applicability of any 
provision of Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a 
project to be carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2001, the Secretary shall 
submit to Congress a report on the results of the pilot program carried 
out under this section, including a recommendation concerning whether 
the program should be implemented on a national basis.
    (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000 for the period 
beginning with fiscal year 2000, to remain available until expended.
    SEC. 572. SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN AREA WATERSHED RESTORATION, 
      CALIFORNIA.
    (a) Limitation.--The Secretary may undertake studies to determine 
the extent of ground water contamination and the feasibility of 
prevention and cleanup of such contamination resulting from the acts of 
a Federal department or agency--
        (1) at or in the vicinity of McClellan Air Force Base, Mather 
    Air Force Base, or Sacramento Army Depot, California; or
        (2) at any place in the Sacramento metropolitan area watershed 
    where the Federal Government would be a responsible party under any 
    Federal environmental law.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $1,000,000 for the period 
beginning with fiscal year 2000.

SEC. 573. ONONDAGA LAKE, NEW YORK.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall--
        (1) plan, design, and construct projects that are consistent 
    with the Onondaga Lake Management Plan and comply with the amended 
    consent judgment and the project labor agreement for the 
    environmental restoration, conservation, and management of Onondaga 
    Lake, New York; and
        (2) provide, in coordination with the Administrator of the 
    Environmental Protection Agency, financial assistance, including 
    grants to the State of New York and political subdivisions of the 
    State, for the development and implementation of projects to 
    restore, conserve, and manage the lake.
    (b) Partnership.--
        (1) In general.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary 
    shall establish and lead a partnership with appropriate Federal 
    agencies (including the Environmental Protection Agency) and the 
    State of New York and political subdivisions of the State for the 
    purpose of development and implementation of the projects.
        (2) Coordination with actions under other law.--
            (A) In general.--The partnership shall coordinate the 
        actions taken under this section with actions to restore and 
        conserve Onondaga Lake taken under other provisions of Federal 
        or State law.
            (B) No effect on other law.--Except as provided in 
        subsection (g), this section does not alter, modify, or affect 
        any other provision of Federal or State law.
        (3) Termination.--Unless the Secretary and the Governor of the 
    State of New York agree otherwise, the partnership established 
    under this subsection shall terminate not later than the date that 
    is 15 years after the date of enactment of this Act.
    (c) Revisions to the Onondaga Lake Management Plan.--
        (1) In general.--In consultation with the partnership 
    established under subsection (b) and after providing for public 
    review and comment, the Secretary and the Administrator of the 
    Environmental Protection Agency shall approve revisions to the 
    Onondaga Lake Management Plan if the Governor of the State of New 
    York concurs in the approval.
        (2) No effect on modification of amended consent judgment.--
    Paragraph (1) has no effect on the conditions under which the 
    amended consent judgment referred to in subsection (a)(1) may be 
    modified.
    (d) Cost Sharing.--
        (1) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of a 
    project constructed under subsection (a) shall be not less than 30 
    percent of the total cost of the project and may be provided 
    through the provision of in-kind services.
        (2) Administration and management.--The Secretary's 
    administration and management of the project shall be at full 
    Federal expense.
    (e) No Effect on Liability.--The provision of financial assistance 
under this section shall not relieve from liability any person that 
would otherwise be liable under Federal or State law for damages, 
response costs, natural resource damages, restitution, equitable 
relief, or any other relief.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000.
    (g) Repeal.--Title IV of the Great Lakes Critical Programs Act of 
1990 (104 Stat. 3010) and section 411 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4648) are repealed effective on the 
date that is 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 574. EAST LYNN LAKE, WEST VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall defer any decision relating to the leasing of 
mineral resources underlying East Lynn Lake, West Virginia, project 
lands to the Federal entity vested with such leasing authority.

SEC. 575. EEL RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
whether flooding in the city of Ferndale, California, is the result of 
the Federal flood control project on the Eel River.
    (b) Mitigation Measures.--If the Secretary determines that the 
flooding is the result of the project, the Secretary shall take 
appropriate measures (including dredging of the Salt River and 
construction of sediment ponds at the confluence of Francis, Reas, and 
Williams Creeks) to mitigate the flooding.

SEC. 576. NORTH LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary--
        (1) shall review a report prepared by the non-Federal interest 
    concerning flood protection for the Dark Hollow area of North 
    Little Rock, Arkansas; and
        (2) if the Secretary determines that the report meets the 
    evaluation and design standards of the Corps of Engineers and that 
    the project is economically justified, technically sound, and 
    environmentally acceptable, may carry out the project.
    SEC. 577. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER, MISSISSIPPI PLACE, ST. PAUL, 
      MINNESOTA.
    (a) In General.--The Secretary may enter into a cooperative 
agreement to participate in a project for the planning, design, and 
construction of infrastructure and other improvements at Mississippi 
Place, St. Paul, Minnesota.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--
        (1) In general.--The Federal share of the cost of the project 
    shall be 50 percent. The Federal share may be provided in the form 
    of grants or reimbursements of project costs.
        (2) Credit for non-federal work.--The non-Federal interest 
    shall receive credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of 
    the project for reasonable costs incurred by the non-Federal 
    interest as a result of participation in the planning, design, and 
    construction of the project.
        (3) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The non-Federal 
    interest shall receive credit toward the non-Federal share of the 
    cost of the project for land, easements, rights-of-way, and 
    relocations provided by the non-Federal interest with respect to 
    the project.
        (4) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
    operation and maintenance costs for the project shall be 100 
    percent.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $3,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 578. DREDGING OF SALT PONDS IN THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND.

    The Secretary may acquire for the State of Rhode Island a dredge 
and associated equipment with the capacity to dredge approximately 100 
cubic yards per hour for use by the State in dredging salt ponds in the 
State.
    SEC. 579. UPPER SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN, PENNSYLVANIA AND NEW YORK.
    Section 567(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3787) is amended by adding at the end the following:
        ``(3) The Chemung River watershed, New York, at an estimated 
    Federal cost of $5,000,000.''.

SEC. 580. CUMBERLAND, MARYLAND, FLOOD PROJECT MITIGATION.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control and other purposes, 
Cumberland, Maryland, authorized by section 5 of the Act of June 22, 
1936 (commonly known as the ``Flood Control Act of 1936'') (49 Stat. 
1574, chapter 688), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
undertake, as a separate part of the project, restoration of the 
historic Chesapeake and Ohio Canal substantially in accordance with the 
Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historic Park, Cumberland, Maryland, 
Rewatering Design Analysis, dated February 1998, at a total cost of 
$15,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $9,750,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $5,250,000.
    (b) In-Kind Services.--The non-Federal interest for the restoration 
project under subsection (a)--
        (1) may provide all or a portion of the non-Federal share of 
    project costs in the form of in-kind services; and
        (2) shall receive credit toward the non-Federal share of 
    project costs for design and construction work performed by the 
    non-Federal interest before execution of a project cooperation 
    agreement and for land, easements, and rights-of-way required for 
    the restoration and acquired by the non-Federal interest before 
    execution of such an agreement.
    (c) Operation and Maintenance.--The operation and maintenance of 
the restoration project under subsection (a) shall be the full 
responsibility of the National Park Service.

SEC. 581. CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA.

    Section 5(b)(3)(C)(i) of the Act of August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 
426h), is amended by inserting before the semicolon the following: ``, 
including the city of Miami Beach, Florida''.
    SEC. 582. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR COLUMBIA AND SNAKE 
      RIVERS SALMON SURVIVAL.
    Section 511 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (16 
U.S.C. 3301 note; Public Law 104-303) is amended by striking subsection 
(a) and all that follows and inserting the following:
    ``(a) Salmon Survival Activities.--
        ``(1) In general.--In conjunction with the Secretary of 
    Commerce and the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary shall 
    accelerate ongoing research and development activities, and may 
    carry out or participate in additional research and development 
    activities, for the purpose of developing innovative methods and 
    technologies for improving the survival of salmon, especially 
    salmon in the Columbia/Snake River Basin.
        ``(2) Accelerated activities.--Accelerated research and 
    development activities referred to in paragraph (1) may include 
    research and development related to--
            ``(A) impacts from water resources projects and other 
        impacts on salmon life cycles;
            ``(B) juvenile and adult salmon passage;
            ``(C) light and sound guidance systems;
            ``(D) surface-oriented collector systems;
            ``(E) transportation mechanisms; and
            ``(F) dissolved gas monitoring and abatement.
        ``(3) Additional activities.--Additional research and 
    development activities referred to in paragraph (1) may include 
    research and development related to--
            ``(A) studies of juvenile salmon survival in spawning and 
        rearing areas;
            ``(B) estuary and near-ocean juvenile and adult salmon 
        survival;
            ``(C) impacts on salmon life cycles from sources other than 
        water resources projects;
            ``(D) cryopreservation of fish gametes and formation of a 
        germ plasma repository for threatened and endangered 
        populations of native fish; and
            ``(E) other innovative technologies and actions intended to 
        improve fish survival, including the survival of resident fish.
        ``(4) Coordination.--The Secretary shall coordinate any 
    activities carried out under this subsection with appropriate 
    Federal, State, and local agencies, affected Indian tribes, and the 
    Northwest Power Planning Council.
        ``(5) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date of 
    enactment of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999, the 
    Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the research and 
    development activities carried out under this subsection, including 
    any recommendations of the Secretary concerning the research and 
    development activities.
        ``(6) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to 
    be appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out research and development 
    activities under paragraph (3).
    ``(b) Advanced Turbine Development.--
        ``(1) In general.--In conjunction with the Secretary of Energy, 
    the Secretary shall accelerate efforts toward developing and 
    installing in Corps of Engineers-operated dams innovative, 
    efficient, and environmentally safe hydropower turbines, including 
    design of fish-friendly turbines, for use on the Columbia/Snake 
    River hydrosystem.
        ``(2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to 
    be appropriated $35,000,000 to carry out this subsection.
    ``(c) Management of Predation on Columbia/Snake River System Native 
Fishes.--
        ``(1) Nesting avian predators.--In conjunction with the 
    Secretary of Commerce and the Secretary of the Interior, and 
    consistent with a management plan to be developed by the United 
    States Fish and Wildlife Service, the Secretary shall carry out 
    methods to reduce nesting populations of avian predators on dredge 
    spoil islands in the Columbia River under the jurisdiction of the 
    Secretary.
        ``(2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to 
    be appropriated $1,000,000 to carry out research and development 
    activities under this subsection.
    ``(d) Implementation.--Nothing in this section affects the 
authority of the Secretary to implement the results of the research and 
development carried out under this section or any other law.''.

SEC. 583. LARKSPUR FERRY CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall work with the Secretary of Transportation on a 
proposed solution to carry out the project to maintain the Larkspur 
Ferry Channel, Larkspur, California, authorized by section 601(d) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4148).

SEC. 584. HOLES CREEK FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, OHIO.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
non-Federal share of project costs for the project for flood control, 
Holes Creek, Ohio, shall not exceed the sum of--
        (1) the total amount projected as the non-Federal share as of 
    September 30, 1996, in the Project Cooperation Agreement executed 
    on that date; and
        (2) 100 percent of the amount of any increases in the cost of 
    the locally preferred plan over the cost estimated in the Project 
    Cooperation Agreement.
    (b) Reimbursement.--The Secretary shall reimburse the non-Federal 
interest any amount paid by the non-Federal interest in excess of the 
non-Federal share.

SEC. 585. SAN JACINTO DISPOSAL AREA, GALVESTON, TEXAS.

    Section 108 of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 
1994 (107 Stat. 1320), is amended--
        (1) in the first sentence of subsection (a), by inserting ``all 
    or any part of'' after ``absolute title to'';
        (2) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Compensation for Conveyance.--
        ``(1) In general.--Upon receipt of compensation from the city 
    of Galveston, the Secretary shall convey the parcel, or any part of 
    the parcel, as described in subsection (a).
        ``(2) Full parcel.--If the full 605-acre parcel is conveyed, 
    the compensation shall be--
            ``(A) conveyance to the Department of the Army of fee 
        simple absolute title to a parcel of land containing 
        approximately 564 acres on Pelican Island, Texas, in the Eneas 
        Smith Survey, A-190, Pelican Island, city of Galveston, 
        Galveston County, Texas, adjacent to property currently owned 
        by the United States, with the fair market value of the parcel 
        being determined in accordance with subsection (d); and
            ``(B) payment to the United States of an amount equal to 
        the difference between the fair market value of the parcel to 
        be conveyed under subsection (a) and the fair market value of 
        the parcel to be conveyed under subparagraph (A).
        ``(3) Partial parcel.--If the conveyance is 125 acres or less, 
    compensation shall be an amount equal to the fair market value of 
    the parcel to be conveyed, with the fair market value of the parcel 
    being determined in accordance with subsection (d).''; and
        (3) in the second sentence of subsection (c)--
            (A) by inserting ``, or any part of the parcel,'' after 
        ``parcel''; and
            (B) by inserting ``, if any,'' after ``LCA''.

SEC. 586. WATER MONITORING STATION.

    Section 584(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3791) is amended by striking ``$50,000'' and inserting 
``$100,000''.

SEC. 587. OVERFLOW MANAGEMENT FACILITY, RHODE ISLAND.

    Section 585 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3791) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``river'' and inserting 
    ``sewer''; and
        (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``$30,000,000'' and 
    inserting ``$60,000,000''.

SEC. 588. LOWER CHENA RIVER, ALASKA.

    The Secretary may expend up to $500,000 in fiscal year 2000 to 
complete the dredging project initiated on the Lower Chena River, 
Alaska.

SEC. 589. NUMANA DAM FISH PASSAGE, NEVADA.

    After the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
complete planning, design, and construction of the Numana Dam Fish 
Passage Project, currently being evaluated under section 1135 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), under 
section 906(b) of that Act (33 U.S.C. 2283(b)).

SEC. 590. EMBREY DAM, VIRGINIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall remove the Embrey Dam on the 
Rappahannock River at Fredericksburg, Virginia, at full Federal 
expense.
    (b) Use of Existing Studies.--The Secretary shall expedite the 
feasibility study and preconstruction, engineering, and design of the 
project by using, to the maximum extent practicable, existing studies 
prepared by the State and non-Federal interests.
    (c) Authorization.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry 
out this section $10,000,000.

SEC. 591. ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION, FRONT ROYAL, VIRGINIA.

    (a) Participation of Secretary.--
        (1) Authorization.--The Secretary shall participate with other 
    Federal departments and agencies in environmental restoration and 
    remediation activities (including the demolition of contaminated 
    buildings) at the Avtex Fibers facility in Front Royal, Virginia, 
    at full Federal expense.
        (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
    appropriated to carry out this section $12,000,000.
    (b) Participation of Secretary of Defense.--
        (1) Requirement.--The Secretary of Defense shall make available 
    $5,000,000 for environmental restoration and remediation activities 
    (including the demolition of contaminated buildings) at the Avtex 
    Fibers facility in Front Royal, Virginia.
        (2) Source of funds.--The amount made available under paragraph 
    (1) shall be derived from amounts in the Environmental Restoration 
    Account, Formerly Used Defense Sites, established by section 2703 
    of title 10, United States Code.

SEC. 592. MISSISSIPPI.

    (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a pilot 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
Mississippi.
    (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may be in 
the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in Mississippi, including projects for wastewater treatment 
and related facilities, elimination or control of combined sewer 
overflows, water supply and related facilities, environmental 
restoration, and surface water resource protection and development.
    (c) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
publicly owned.
    (d) Local Cooperation Agreement.--
        (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
    section, the Secretary shall enter into a local cooperation 
    agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
    construction of the project to be carried out with the assistance.
        (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered 
    into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
            (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
        with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
        or resource protection and development plan, including 
        appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
            (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
        such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
        ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by the 
        non-Federal interest.
        (3) Cost sharing.--
            (A) In general.--The Federal share of project costs under 
        each local cooperation agreement entered into under this 
        subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal share may be in the 
        form of grants or reimbursements of project costs.
            (B) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal interest shall 
        receive credit for the reasonable costs of design work 
        completed by the non-Federal interest before entering into a 
        local cooperation agreement with the Secretary for a project. 
        The credit for the design work shall not exceed 6 percent of 
        the total construction costs of the project.
            (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
        of the non-Federal share of the costs of a project that is the 
        subject of an agreement under this section, the non-Federal 
        interest shall receive credit for reasonable interest incurred 
        in providing the non-Federal share of the project's costs.
            (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The non-
        Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
        rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
        project costs (including all reasonable costs associated with 
        obtaining permits necessary for the construction, operation, 
        and maintenance of the project on publicly owned or controlled 
        land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total project costs.
            (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
        operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
        assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
    (e) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the applicability of any 
provision of Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a 
project to be carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (f) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2001, the Secretary shall 
submit to Congress a report on the results of the pilot program carried 
out under this section, including recommendations concerning whether 
the program should be implemented on a national basis.
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $25,000,000 for the period 
beginning with fiscal year 2000, to remain available until expended.

SEC. 593. CENTRAL NEW MEXICO.

    (a) Definition of Central New Mexico.--In this section, the term 
``central New Mexico'' means the counties of Bernalillo, Sandoval, and 
Valencia, New Mexico.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a pilot 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
central New Mexico.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may be in 
the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in central New Mexico, including projects for wastewater 
treatment and related facilities, water supply, conservation, and 
related facilities, stormwater retention and remediation, environmental 
restoration, and surface water resource protection and development.
    (d) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
publicly owned.
    (e) Local Cooperation Agreement.--
        (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
    section, the Secretary shall enter into a local cooperation 
    agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
    construction of the project to be carried out with the assistance.
        (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered 
    into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
            (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
        with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
        or resource protection and development plan, including 
        appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
            (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
        such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
        ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by the 
        non-Federal interest.
        (3) Cost sharing.--
            (A) In general.--The Federal share of project costs under 
        each local cooperation agreement entered into under this 
        subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal share may be in the 
        form of grants or reimbursements of project costs.
            (B) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal interest shall 
        receive credit for the reasonable costs of design work 
        completed by the non-Federal interest before entering into a 
        local cooperation agreement with the Secretary for a project. 
        The credit for the design work shall not exceed 6 percent of 
        the total construction costs of the project.
            (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
        of the non-Federal share of the costs of a project that is the 
        subject of an agreement under this section, the non-Federal 
        interest shall receive credit for reasonable interest incurred 
        in providing the non-Federal share of the project's costs.
            (D) Land, easements, and rights-of-way credit.--The non-
        Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
        rights-of-way, and relocations toward the non-Federal share of 
        project costs (including all reasonable costs associated with 
        obtaining permits necessary for the construction, operation, 
        and maintenance of the project on publicly owned or controlled 
        land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total project costs.
            (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
        operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
        assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the applicability of any 
provision of Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a 
project to be carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2001, the Secretary shall 
submit to Congress a report on the results of the pilot program carried 
out under this section, including recommendations concerning whether 
the program should be implemented on a national basis.
    (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $25,000,000 for the period 
beginning with fiscal year 2000, to remain available until expended.

SEC. 594. OHIO.

    (a) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary shall establish a 
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal interests in 
Ohio.
    (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may be in 
the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in Ohio, including projects for--
        (1) wastewater treatment and related facilities;
        (2) combined sewer overflow, water supply, storage, treatment, 
    and related facilities;
        (3) mine drainage;
        (4) environmental restoration; and
        (5) surface water resource protection and development.
    (c) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
publicly owned.
    (d) Project Cooperation Agreements.--
        (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
    section, the Secretary shall enter into a project cooperation 
    agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
    construction of the project to be carried out with the assistance.
        (2) Requirements.--Each project cooperation agreement entered 
    into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
            (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
        with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
        development plan or resource protection plan, including 
        appropriate plans and specifications.
            (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
        such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
        ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by the 
        non-Federal interest.
        (3) Cost sharing.--
            (A) In general.--The Federal share of project costs under 
        each project cooperation agreement entered into under this 
        subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal share may be in the 
        form of grants or reimbursements of project costs.
            (B) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal interest shall 
        receive credit for the reasonable costs of design work 
        completed by the non-Federal interest before entering into a 
        project cooperation agreement with the Secretary.
            (C) Credit for certain financing costs.--In case of a delay 
        in the reimbursement of the non-Federal share of the costs of a 
        project, the non-Federal interest shall receive credit for 
        reasonable interest and other associated financing costs 
        necessary for the non-Federal interest to provide the non-
        Federal share of the project costs.
            (D) Land, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations.--The 
        non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
        rights-of-way, and relocations provided by the non-Federal 
        interest toward the non-Federal share of project costs 
        (including costs associated with obtaining permits necessary 
        for the placement of the project on publicly owned or 
        controlled land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total project 
        costs.
            (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
        operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed under 
        an agreement entered into under this subsection shall be 100 
        percent.
    (e) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the applicability of any 
provision of Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a 
project to be carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (f) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2001, the Secretary shall 
submit to Congress a report on the results of the program carried out 
under this section, including recommendations concerning whether the 
program should be implemented on a national basis.
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $60,000,000.

SEC. 595. RURAL NEVADA AND MONTANA.

    (a) Definition of Rural Nevada.--In this section, the term ``rural 
Nevada'' means--
        (1) the counties of Lincoln, White Pine, Nye, Eureka, Elko, 
    Humboldt, Pershing, Churchill, Storey, Lyon, Carson, Douglas, 
    Mineral, Esmeralda, and Lander, Nevada;
        (2) the portions of Washoe County, Nevada, that are located 
    outside the cities of Reno and Sparks; and
        (3) the portions of Clark County, Nevada, that are located 
    outside the cities of Las Vegas, North Las Vegas, and Henderson and 
    the unincorporated portion of the county in the Las Vegas Valley.
    (b) Establishment of Program.--The Secretary may establish a 
program for providing environmental assistance to non-Federal interests 
in rural Nevada and Montana.
    (c) Form of Assistance.--Assistance under this section may be in 
the form of design and construction assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in rural Nevada and Montana, including projects for--
        (1) wastewater treatment and related facilities;
        (2) water supply and related facilities;
        (3) environmental restoration; and
        (4) surface water resource protection and development.
    (d) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide 
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is 
publicly owned.
    (e) Local Cooperation Agreement.--
        (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this 
    section, the Secretary shall enter into a local cooperation 
    agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and 
    construction of the project to be carried out with the assistance.
        (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered 
    into under this subsection shall provide for the following:
            (A) Plan.--Development by the Secretary, in consultation 
        with appropriate Federal and State officials, of a facilities 
        or resource protection and development plan, including 
        appropriate engineering plans and specifications.
            (B) Legal and institutional structures.--Establishment of 
        such legal and institutional structures as are necessary to 
        ensure the effective long-term operation of the project by the 
        non-Federal interest.
        (3) Cost sharing.--
            (A) In general.--The Federal share of project costs under 
        each local cooperation agreement entered into under this 
        subsection shall be 75 percent. The Federal share may be in the 
        form of grants or reimbursements of project costs.
            (B) Credit for design work.--The non-Federal interest shall 
        receive credit for the reasonable costs of design work 
        completed by the non-Federal interest before entering into a 
        local cooperation agreement with the Secretary for a project.
            (C) Credit for interest.--In case of a delay in the funding 
        of the non-Federal share of the costs of a project that is the 
        subject of an agreement under this section, the non-Federal 
        interest shall receive credit for reasonable interest incurred 
        in providing the non-Federal share of the project costs.
            (D) Land, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations.--The 
        non-Federal interest shall receive credit for land, easements, 
        rights-of-way, and relocations provided by the non-Federal 
        interest toward the non-Federal share of project costs 
        (including all reasonable costs associated with obtaining 
        permits necessary for the construction, operation, and 
        maintenance of the project on publicly owned or controlled 
        land), but not to exceed 25 percent of total project costs.
            (E) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal share of 
        operation and maintenance costs for projects constructed with 
        assistance provided under this section shall be 100 percent.
    (f) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws.--Nothing in this 
section waives, limits, or otherwise affects the applicability of any 
provision of Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a 
project to be carried out with assistance provided under this section.
    (g) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2001, the Secretary shall 
submit to Congress a report on the results of the program carried out 
under this section, including recommendations concerning whether the 
program should be implemented on a national basis.
    (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section for the period beginning with 
fiscal year 2001--
        (1) $25,000,000 for rural Nevada; and
        (2) $25,000,000 for Montana;
to remain available until expended.

SEC. 596. PHOENIX, ARIZONA.

    Section 1608 of the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study 
and Facilities Act (43 U.S.C. 390h-6) is amended--
        (1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following:
    ``(a) The Secretary, in cooperation with the city of Phoenix, 
Arizona, shall participate in the planning, design, and construction of 
the Phoenix Metropolitan Water Reclamation and Reuse Project to utilize 
fully wastewater from the regional wastewater treatment plant for 
direct municipal, industrial, agricultural and environmental purposes, 
groundwater recharge and indirect potable reuse in the Phoenix 
metropolitan area.'';
        (2) in subsection (b), by striking the first sentence; and
        (3) by striking subsection (c).

SEC. 597. NATIONAL HARBOR, MARYLAND.

    (a) In General.--The first section of Public Law 99-215 (99 Stat. 
1724) is amended in the first sentence of subsection (a)(2) by striking 
``solely'' and inserting ``for transportation or''.
    (b) Revision of Quitclaim Deed.--Not later than 30 days after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall--
        (1) with the consent of the grantee, withdraw and revise any 
    terms or conditions in the quitclaim deed of December 16, 1986, 
    between the United States and the Maryland-National Capital Park 
    and Planning Commission that limit the authority of the Maryland-
    National Capital Park and Planning Commission to use the property 
    for transportation purposes; and
        (2) prepare, execute, and record a deed that is consistent with 
    this section and the amendment made by subsection (a).
    (c) Effect on Environmental Law.--Nothing in this section abrogates 
any requirement of any environmental law.

  TITLE VI--CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE, LOWER BRULE SIOUX TRIBE, AND 
     STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION

SEC. 601. DEFINITIONS.

    In this title, the following definitions apply:
        (1) Commission.--The term ``Commission'' means the South Dakota 
    Cultural Resources Advisory Commission established by section 
    605(j).
        (2) Restoration.--The term ``restoration'' means mitigation of 
    the habitat of wildlife.
        (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of 
    the Army.
        (4) Terrestrial wildlife habitat.--The term ``terrestrial 
    wildlife habitat'' means a habitat for a wildlife species 
    (including game and nongame species) that existed or exists on an 
    upland habitat (including a prairie grassland, woodland, bottom 
    land forest, scrub, or shrub) or an emergent wetland habitat.
        (5) Wildlife.--The term ``wildlife'' has the meaning given the 
    term in section 8 of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 
    U.S.C. 666b).

SEC. 602. TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION.

    (a) Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Plans.--
        (1) In general.--In accordance with this subsection and in 
    consultation with the Secretary and the Secretary of the Interior, 
    the State of South Dakota, the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, and the 
    Lower Brule Sioux Tribe shall, as a condition of the receipt of 
    funds under this title, each develop a plan for the restoration of 
    terrestrial wildlife habitat loss that occurred as a result of 
    flooding related to the Big Bend and Oahe projects carried out as 
    part of the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin program.
        (2) Submission of plan to secretary.--On completion of a plan 
    for terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration, the State of South 
    Dakota, the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, and the Lower Brule Sioux 
    Tribe shall submit the plan to the Secretary.
        (3) Review by secretary and submission to committees.--The 
    Secretary shall review the plan and submit the plan, with any 
    comments, to the appropriate committees of the Senate and the House 
    of Representatives.
        (4) Funding for carrying out plans.--
            (A) State of south dakota.--
                (i) Notification.--On receipt of the plan for 
            terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration submitted by the 
            State of South Dakota, each of the committees referred to 
            in paragraph (3) shall notify the Secretary of the receipt 
            of the plan.
                (ii) Availability of funds.--On notification in 
            accordance with clause (i), the Secretary shall make 
            available to the State of South Dakota funds from the South 
            Dakota Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust Fund 
            established under section 603, to be used to carry out the 
            plan for terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration submitted 
            by the State and only after the Trust Fund is fully 
            capitalized.
            (B) Cheyenne river sioux tribe and lower brule sioux 
        tribe.--
                (i) Notification.--On receipt of the plan for 
            terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration submitted by the 
            Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, 
            each of the committees referred to in paragraph (3) shall 
            notify the Secretary of the Treasury of the receipt of each 
            of the plans.
                (ii) Availability of funds.--On notification in 
            accordance with clause (i), the Secretary of the Treasury 
            shall make available to the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and 
            the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe funds from the Cheyenne River 
            Sioux Tribe Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust 
            Fund and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe Terrestrial Wildlife 
            Habitat Restoration Trust Fund, respectively, established 
            under section 604, to be used to carry out the plan for 
            terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration submitted by the 
            Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe, 
            respectively, and only after the Trust Fund is fully 
            capitalized.
            (C) Transition period.--
                (i) In general.--During the period described in clause 
            (ii), the Secretary shall--

                    (I) fund the terrestrial wildlife habitat 
                restoration programs being carried out on the date of 
                enactment of this Act on Oahe and Big Bend project land 
                and the plans established under this section at a level 
                that does not exceed the highest amount of funding that 
                was provided for the programs during a previous fiscal 
                year; and
                    (II) fund the activities described in sections 
                603(d)(3) and 604(d)(3).

                (ii) Period.--Clause (i) shall apply during the 
            period--

                    (I) beginning on the date of enactment of this Act; 
                and
                    (II) ending on the date on which funds are made 
                available for use from the South Dakota Terrestrial 
                Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust Fund under section 
                603(d)(3)(A)(i) and the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe 
                Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust Fund and 
                the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe Terrestrial Wildlife 
                Habitat Restoration Trust Fund under section 
                604(d)(3)(A)(i).

    (b) Programs for the Purchase of Wildlife Habitat Leases.--
        (1) In general.--The State of South Dakota may use funds made 
    available under section 603(d)(3)(A)(iii) to develop a program for 
    the purchase of wildlife habitat leases that meets the requirements 
    of this subsection.
        (2) Development of a plan.--
            (A) In general.--If the State of South Dakota, the Cheyenne 
        River Sioux Tribe, or the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe elects to 
        conduct a program under this subsection, the State of South 
        Dakota, the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, or the Lower Brule 
        Sioux Tribe (in consultation with the United States Fish and 
        Wildlife Service and the Secretary and with an opportunity for 
        public comment) shall develop a plan to lease land for the 
        protection and development of wildlife habitat, including 
        habitat for threatened and endangered species, associated with 
        the Missouri River ecosystem.
            (B) Use for program.--The plan shall be used by the State 
        of South Dakota, the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, or the Lower 
        Brule Sioux Tribe in carrying out the program carried out under 
        paragraph (1).
        (3) Conditions of leases.--Each lease covered under a program 
    carried out under paragraph (1) shall specify that the owner of the 
    property that is subject to the lease shall provide--
            (A) public access for sportsmen during hunting season; and
            (B) public access for other outdoor uses covered under the 
        lease, as negotiated by the landowner and the State of South 
        Dakota, the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, or the Lower Brule 
        Sioux Tribe.
        (4) Use of assistance.--
            (A) State of south dakota.--If the State of South Dakota 
        conducts a program under this subsection, the State may use 
        funds made available under section 603(d)(3)(A)(iii) to--
                (i) acquire easements, rights-of-way, or leases for 
            management and protection of wildlife habitat, including 
            habitat for threatened and endangered species, and public 
            access to wildlife on private property in the State of 
            South Dakota;
                (ii) create public access to Federal or State land 
            through the purchase of easements or rights-of-way that 
            traverse such private property; or
                (iii) lease land for the creation or restoration of a 
            wetland on such private property.
            (B) Cheyenne river sioux tribe and lower brule sioux 
        tribe.--If the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe or the Lower Brule 
        Sioux Tribe conducts a program under this subsection, the Tribe 
        may use funds made available under section 604(d)(3)(A)(iii) 
        for the purposes described in subparagraph (A).
    (c) Federal Obligation for Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Mitigation 
for the Big Bend and Oahe Projects in South Dakota.--The establishment 
of the trust funds under sections 603 and 604 and the development and 
implementation of plans for terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration 
developed by the State of South Dakota, the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, 
and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe in accordance with this section shall 
be considered to satisfy the Federal obligation under the Fish and 
Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.) for terrestrial 
wildlife habitat mitigation for the State of South Dakota, the Cheyenne 
River Sioux Tribe, and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe for the Big Bend and 
Oahe projects carried out as part of the Pick-Sloan Missouri River 
Basin program.
    SEC. 603. SOUTH DAKOTA TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION 
      TRUST FUND.
    (a) Establishment.--There is established in the Treasury of the 
United States a fund to be known as the ``South Dakota Terrestrial 
Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust Fund'' (referred to in this section 
as the ``Fund'').
    (b) Funding.--For the fiscal year during which this Act is enacted 
and each fiscal year thereafter until the aggregate amount deposited in 
the Fund under this subsection is equal to at least $108,000,000, the 
Secretary of the Treasury shall transfer $10,000,000 from the general 
fund of the Treasury to the Fund.
    (c) Investments.--
        (1) In general.--At the request of the Secretary, the Secretary 
    of the Treasury shall invest the amounts deposited under subsection 
    (b) only in interest-bearing obligations of the United States or in 
    obligations guaranteed by the United States as to both principal 
    and interest.
        (2) Interest rate.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall invest 
    amounts in the fund in obligations that carry the highest rate of 
    interest among available obligations of the required maturity.
    (d) Payments.--
        (1) In general.--All amounts credited as interest under 
    subsection (c) shall be available, without fiscal year limitation, 
    to the State of South Dakota for use in accordance with paragraph 
    (3) after the Fund has been fully capitalized.
        (2) Withdrawal and transfer of funds.--Subject to section 
    602(a)(4)(A), the Secretary shall withdraw amounts credited as 
    interest under paragraph (1) and transfer the amounts to the State 
    of South Dakota for use as State funds in accordance with paragraph 
    (3) after the Fund has been fully capitalized.
        (3) Use of transferred funds.--
            (A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B), the State of 
        South Dakota shall use the amounts transferred under paragraph 
        (2) only to--
                (i) fully fund the annually scheduled work described in 
            the terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration plan of the 
            State developed under section 602(a); and
                (ii) with any remaining funds--

                    (I) protect archaeological, historical, and 
                cultural sites located along the Missouri River on land 
                transferred to the State;
                    (II) fund all costs associated with the ownership, 
                management, operation, administration, maintenance, and 
                development of recreation areas and other lands that 
                are transferred to the State of South Dakota by the 
                Secretary;
                    (III) purchase and administer wildlife habitat 
                leases under section 602(b);
                    (IV) carry out other activities described in 
                section 602; and
                    (V) develop and maintain public access to, and 
                protect, wildlife habitat and recreation areas along 
                the Missouri River.

            (B) Prohibition.--The amounts transferred under paragraph 
        (2) shall not be used for the purchase of land in fee title.
    (e) Transfers and Withdrawals.--Except as provided in subsection 
(d), the Secretary may not transfer or withdraw any amount deposited 
under subsection (b).
    (f) Administrative Expenses.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary of the Treasury such sums as are 
necessary to pay the administrative expenses of the Fund.
    SEC. 604. CHEYENNE RIVER SIOUX TRIBE AND LOWER BRULE SIOUX TRIBE 
      TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION TRUST FUNDS.
    (a) Establishment.--There are established in the Treasury of the 
United States 2 funds to be known as the ``Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe 
Terrestrial Wildlife Restoration Trust Fund'' and the ``Lower Brule 
Sioux Tribe Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust Fund'' (each 
of which is referred to in this section as a ``Fund'').
    (b) Funding.--
        (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), for the fiscal year 
    during which this Act is enacted and each fiscal year thereafter 
    until the aggregate amount deposited in the Funds under this 
    subsection is equal to at least $57,400,000, the Secretary of the 
    Treasury shall transfer $5,000,000 from the general fund of the 
    Treasury to the Funds.
        (2) Allocation.--Of the total amount of funds deposited in the 
    Funds for a fiscal year, the Secretary of the Treasury shall 
    deposit--
            (A) 74 percent of the funds into the Cheyenne River Sioux 
        Tribe Terrestrial Wildlife Restoration Trust Fund; and
            (B) 26 percent of the funds into the Lower Brule Sioux 
        Tribe Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat Restoration Trust Fund.
    (c) Investments.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall invest the 
    amounts deposited under subsection (b) only in interest-bearing 
    obligations of the United States or in obligations guaranteed as to 
    both principal and interest by the United States.
        (2) Interest rate.--The Secretary of the Treasury shall invest 
    amounts in the Funds in obligations that carry the highest rate of 
    interest among available obligations of the required maturity.
    (d) Payments.--
        (1) In general.--All amounts credited as interest under 
    subsection (c) shall be available after the Trust Funds are fully 
    capitalized, without fiscal year limitation, to the Cheyenne River 
    Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe for their use in 
    accordance with paragraph (3).
        (2) Withdrawal and transfer of funds.--Subject to section 
    602(a)(4)(B), the Secretary of the Treasury shall withdraw amounts 
    credited as interest under paragraph (1) and transfer the amounts 
    to the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe 
    for use in accordance with paragraph (3).
        (3) Use of transferred funds.--
            (A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B), the Cheyenne 
        River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe shall use the 
        amounts transferred under paragraph (2) only to--
                (i) fully fund the annually scheduled work described in 
            the terrestrial wildlife habitat restoration plan of the 
            respective Tribe developed under section 602(a); and
                (ii) with any remaining funds--

                    (I) protect archaeological, historical, and 
                cultural sites located along the Missouri River on land 
                transferred to the respective Tribe;
                    (II) fund all costs associated with the ownership, 
                management, operation, administration, maintenance, and 
                development of recreation areas and other lands that 
                are transferred to the respective Tribe by the 
                Secretary;
                    (III) purchase and administer wildlife habitat 
                leases under section 602(b);
                    (IV) carry out other activities described in 
                section 602; and
                    (V) develop and maintain public access to, and 
                protect, wildlife habitat and recreation areas along 
                the Missouri River.

            (B) Prohibition.--The amounts transferred under paragraph 
        (2) shall not be used for the purchase of land in fee title.
    (e) Transfers and Withdrawals.--Except as provided in subsection 
(d), the Secretary of the Treasury may not transfer or withdraw any 
amount deposited under subsection (b).
    (f) Administrative Expenses.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary of the Treasury such sums as are 
necessary to pay the administrative expenses of the Fund.

SEC. 605. TRANSFER OF FEDERAL LAND TO STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA.

    (a) In General.--
        (1) Transfer.--
            (A) In general.--The Secretary shall transfer to the 
        Department of Game, Fish and Parks of the State of South Dakota 
        (referred to in this section as the ``Department'') the land 
        and recreation areas described in subsections (b) and (c) for 
        fish and wildlife purposes, or public recreation uses, in 
        perpetuity.
            (B) Permits, rights-of-way, and easements.--All permits, 
        rights-of-way, and easements granted by the Secretary to the 
        Oglala Sioux Tribe for land on the west side of the Missouri 
        River between the Oahe Dam and Highway 14, and all permits, 
        rights-of-way, and easements on any other land administered by 
        the Secretary and used by the Oglala Sioux Rural Water Supply 
        System, are granted to the Oglala Sioux Tribe in perpetuity to 
        be held in trust under section 3(e) of the Mni Wiconi Project 
        Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 2568).
        (2) Uses.--The Department shall maintain and develop the land 
    outside the recreation areas for fish and wildlife purposes in 
    accordance with--
            (A) fish and wildlife purposes in effect on the date of 
        enactment of this Act; or
            (B) a plan developed under section 602.
        (3) Corps of engineers.--The transfer shall not interfere with 
    the Corps of Engineers operation of a project under this section 
    for an authorized purpose of the project under the Act of December 
    22, 1944 (58 Stat. 887, chapter 665; 33 U.S.C. 701-1 et seq.), or 
    other applicable law.
        (4) Secretary.--The Secretary shall retain the right to 
    inundate with water the land transferred to the Department under 
    this section or draw down a project reservoir, as necessary to 
    carry out an authorized purpose of a project.
    (b) Land Transferred.--The land described in this subsection is 
land that--
        (1) is located above the top of the exclusive flood pool of the 
    Oahe, Big Bend, Fort Randall, and Gavin's Point projects of the 
    Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin program;
        (2) was acquired by the Secretary for the implementation of the 
    Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin program;
        (3) is located outside the external boundaries of a reservation 
    of an Indian Tribe; and
        (4) is located within the State of South Dakota.
    (c) Recreation Areas Transferred.--A recreation area described in 
this section includes the land and facilities within a recreation area 
that--
        (1) the Secretary determines, at the time of the transfer, is a 
    recreation area classified for recreation use by the Corps of 
    Engineers on the date of enactment of this Act;
        (2) is located outside the external boundaries of a reservation 
    of an Indian Tribe;
        (3) is located within the State of South Dakota;
        (4) is not the recreation area known as ``Cottonwood'', 
    ``Training Dike'', or ``Tailwaters''; and
        (5) is located below Gavin's Point Dam in the State of South 
    Dakota in accordance with boundary agreements and reciprocal 
    fishing agreements between the State of South Dakota and the State 
    of Nebraska in effect on the date of enactment of this Act, which 
    agreements shall continue to be honored by the State of South 
    Dakota as the agreements apply to any land or recreation areas 
    transferred under this title to the State of South Dakota below 
    Gavin's Point Dam and on the waters of the Missouri River.
    (d) Map.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
    Department, shall prepare a map of the land and recreation areas 
    transferred under this section.
        (2) Land.--The map shall identify--
            (A) land reasonably expected to be required for project 
        purposes during the 20-year period beginning on the date of 
        enactment of this Act; and
            (B) dams and related structures;
    which shall be retained by the Secretary.
        (3) Availability.--The map shall be on file in the appropriate 
    offices of the Secretary.
    (e) Schedule for Transfer.--
        (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army and the Secretary 
    of the Department shall jointly develop a schedule for transferring 
    the land and recreation areas under this section.
        (2) Transfer deadline.--All land and recreation areas shall be 
    transferred not later than 1 year after the full capitalization of 
    the Trust Fund described in section 603.
    (f) Transfer Conditions.--The land and recreation areas described 
in subsections (b) and (c) shall be transferred in fee title to the 
Department on the following conditions:
        (1) Responsibility for damage.--The Secretary shall not be 
    responsible for any damage to the land caused by flooding, 
    sloughing, erosion, or other changes to the land caused by the 
    operation of any project of the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin 
    program (except as otherwise provided by Federal law).
        (2) Easements, rights-of-way, leases, and cost-sharing 
    agreements.--The Department shall maintain all easements, rights-
    of-way, leases, and cost-sharing agreements that are in effect as 
    of the date of the transfer.
    (g) Hunting and Fishing.--
        (1) In general.--Except as provided in this section, nothing in 
    this title affects jurisdiction over the waters of the Missouri 
    River below the water's edge and outside the exterior boundaries of 
    an Indian reservation in South Dakota.
        (2) Jurisdiction.--
            (A) Transferred land.--On transfer of the land under this 
        section to the State of South Dakota, jurisdiction over the 
        land shall be the same as that over other land owned by the 
        State of South Dakota.
            (B) Land between the missouri river water's edge and the 
        level of the exclusive flood pool.--Jurisdiction over land 
        between the Missouri River water's edge and the level of the 
        exclusive flood pool outside Indian reservations in the State 
        of South Dakota shall be the same as that exercised by the 
        State on other land owned by the State, and that jurisdiction 
        shall follow the fluctuations of the water's edge.
            (C) Federal land.--Jurisdiction over land and water owned 
        by the Federal Government within the boundaries of the State of 
        South Dakota that are not affected by this title shall remain 
        unchanged.
        (3) Easements and access.--The Secretary shall provide the 
    State of South Dakota with easements and access on land and water 
    below the level of the exclusive flood pool outside Indian 
    reservations in the State of South Dakota for recreational and 
    other purposes (including for boat docks, boat ramps, and related 
    structures), so long as the easements would not prevent the Corps 
    of Engineers from carrying out its mission under the Act entitled 
    ``An Act authorizing the construction of certain public works on 
    rivers and harbors for flood control, and for other purposes'', 
    approved December 22, 1944 (commonly known as the ``Flood Control 
    Act of 1944'') (58 Stat. 887).
    (h) Applicability of Law.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
this Act, the following provisions of law shall apply to land 
transferred under this section:
        (1) The National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470 et 
    seq.), including sections 106 and 304 of that Act (16 U.S.C. 470f, 
    470w-3).
        (2) The Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979 (16 
    U.S.C. 470aa et seq.), including sections 4, 6, 7, and 9 of that 
    Act (16 U.S.C. 470cc, 470ee, 470ff, 470hh).
        (3) The Native American Graves Protection Act and Repatriation 
    Act (25 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.), including subsections (a) and (d) of 
    section 3 of that Act (25 U.S.C. 3003).
    (i) Impact Aid.--The land transferred under subsection (a) shall be 
deemed to continue to be owned by the United States for purposes of 
section 8002 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 
U.S.C. 7702).
    SEC. 606. TRANSFER OF CORPS OF ENGINEERS LAND FOR INDIAN TRIBES.
    (a) In General.--
        (1) Transfer.--The Secretary of the Army shall transfer to the 
    Secretary of the Interior the land and recreation areas described 
    in subsections (b) and (c) for the use of the Indian Tribes in 
    perpetuity.
        (2) Corps of engineers.--The transfer shall not interfere with 
    the Corps of Engineers operation of a project under this section 
    for an authorized purpose of the project under the Act of December 
    22, 1944 (58 Stat. 887, chapter 665; 33 U.S.C. 701-1 et seq.), or 
    other applicable law.
        (3) Secretary of the army.--The Secretary of the Army shall 
    retain the right to inundate with water the land transferred to the 
    Secretary of the Interior under this section or draw down a project 
    reservoir, as necessary to carry out an authorized purpose of a 
    project.
        (4) Trust.--The Secretary of the Interior shall hold in trust 
    for the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe 
    the land transferred under this section that is located within the 
    external boundaries of the reservation of the Indian Tribes.
    (b) Land Transferred.--The land described in this subsection is 
land that--
        (1) is located above the top of the exclusive flood pool of the 
    Big Bend and Oahe projects of the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin 
    program;
        (2) was acquired by the Secretary of the Army for the 
    implementation of the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin program; and
        (3) is located within the external boundaries of the 
    reservation of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule 
    Sioux Tribe.
    (c) Recreation Areas Transferred.--A recreation area described in 
this section includes the land and facilities within a recreation area 
that--
        (1) the Secretary determines, at the time of the transfer, is a 
    recreation area classified for recreationuse by the Corps of 
Engineers on the date of enactment of this Act;
        (2) is located within the external boundaries of a reservation 
    of an Indian Tribe; and
        (3) is located within the State of South Dakota.
    (d) Map.--
        (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
    governing bodies of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower 
    Brule Sioux Tribe, shall prepare a map of the land transferred 
    under this section.
        (2) Land.--The map shall identify--
            (A) land reasonably expected to be required for project 
        purposes during the 20-year period beginning on the date of 
        enactment of this Act; and
            (B) dams and related structures;
    which shall be retained by the Secretary.
        (3) Availability.--The map shall be on file in the appropriate 
    offices of the Secretary.
    (e) Schedule for Transfer.--
        (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
    enactment of this Act, the Secretary and the Chairmen of the 
    Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe shall 
    jointly develop a schedule for transferring the land and recreation 
    areas under this section.
        (2) Transfer deadline.--All land and recreation areas shall be 
    transferred not later than 1 year after the full capitalization of 
    the State and tribal Trust Fund described in section 604.
    (f) Transfer Conditions.--The land and recreation areas described 
in subsections (b) and (c) shall be transferred to, and held in trust 
by, the Secretary of the Interior on the following conditions:
        (1) Responsibility for damage.--The Secretary shall not be 
    responsible for any damage to the land caused by flooding, 
    sloughing, erosion, or other changes to the land caused by the 
    operation of any project of the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin 
    program (except as otherwise provided by Federal law).
        (2) Hunting and fishing.--
            (A) In general.--Except as provided in this section, 
        nothing in this title affects jurisdiction over the waters of 
        the Missouri River below the water's edge and within the 
        exterior boundaries of the Cheyenne River Sioux and Lower Brule 
        Sioux Tribe reservations.
            (B) Jurisdiction.--
                (i) In general.--On transfer of the land to the 
            respective tribes under this section, jurisdiction over the 
            land and on land between the water's edge and the level of 
            the exclusive flood pool within the respective Tribe's 
            reservation boundaries shall be the same as that over land 
            held in trust by the Secretary of the Interior on the 
            Cheyenne River Sioux Reservation and the Lower Brule Sioux 
            Reservation, and that jurisdiction shall follow the 
            fluctuations of the water's edge.
                (ii) Jurisdiction unaffected.--Jurisdiction over land 
            and water owned by the Federal Government and held in trust 
            for the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe and Lower Brule Sioux 
            Tribe that is not affected by this title shall remain 
            unchanged.
            (C) Easements and access.--The Secretary shall provide the 
        Tribes with such easements and access on land and water below 
        the level of the exclusive flood pool inside the respective 
        Indian reservations for recreational and other purposes 
        (including for boat docks, boat ramps, and related structures), 
        so long as the easements would not prevent the Corps of 
        Engineers from carrying out its mission under the Act entitled 
        ``An Act authorizing the construction of certain public works 
        on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for other 
        purposes'', approved December 22, 1944 (commonly known as the 
        ``Flood Control Act of 1944'') (58 Stat. 887).
        (3) Easements, rights-of-way, leases, and cost-sharing 
    agreements.--
            (A) Maintenance.--The Secretary of the Interior shall 
        maintain all easements, rights-of-way, leases, and cost-sharing 
        agreements that are in effect as of the date of the transfer.
            (B) Payments to county.--The Secretary of the Interior 
        shall pay any affected county 100 percent of the receipts from 
        the easements, rights-of-way, leases, and cost-sharing 
        agreements described in subparagraph (A).
    (g) Exterior Indian Reservation Boundaries.--Nothing in this 
section diminishes, changes, or otherwise affects the exterior 
boundaries of a reservation of an Indian Tribe.

SEC. 607. ADMINISTRATION.

    (a) In General.--Nothing in this title diminishes or affects--
        (1) any water right of an Indian Tribe;
        (2) any other right of an Indian Tribe, except as specifically 
    provided in another provision of this title;
        (3) any treaty right that is in effect on the date of enactment 
    of this Act;
        (4) any external boundary of an Indian reservation of an Indian 
    Tribe;
        (5) any authority of the State of South Dakota that relates to 
    the protection, regulation, or management of fish, terrestrial 
    wildlife, and cultural and archaeological resources, except as 
    specifically provided in this title; or
        (6) any authority of the Secretary, the Secretary of the 
    Interior, or the head of any other Federal agency under a law in 
    effect on the date of enactment of this Act, including--
            (A) the National Historic Preservation Act (16 U.S.C. 470 
        et seq.);
            (B) the Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979 (16 
        U.S.C. 470aa et seq.);
            (C) the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 U.S.C. 661 
        et seq.);
            (D) the Act entitled ``An Act for the protection of the 
        bald eagle'', approved June 8, 1940 (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.);
            (E) the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.);
            (F) the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et 
        seq.);
            (G) the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation 
        Act (25 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.);
            (H) the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (commonly known 
        as the ``Clean Water Act'') (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.);
            (I) the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300f et seq.); 
        and
            (J) the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 
        U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
    (b) Federal Liability for Damage.--Nothing in this title relieves 
the Federal Government of liability for damage to private property 
caused by the operation of the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin program.
    (c) Flood Control.--Notwithstanding any other provision of this 
title, the Secretary shall retain the authority to operate the Pick-
Sloan Missouri River Basin program for purposes of meeting the 
requirements of the Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 887, chapter 
665; 33 U.S.C. 701-1 et seq.).

SEC. 608. STUDY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall arrange for the United States 
Geological Survey, in consultation with the Bureau of Indian Affairs 
and other appropriate Federal agencies, to complete, not later than 
October 31, 1999, a comprehensive study of the potential impacts of the 
transfer of land under sections 605(b) and 606(b), including potential 
impacts on South Dakota Sioux Tribes having water claims within the 
Missouri River Basin, on water flows in the Missouri River.
    (b) No Transfer Pending Determination.--No transfer of land under 
section 605(b) or 606(b) shall occur until the Secretary determines, 
based on the study, that the transfer of land under either section will 
not significantly reduce the amount of water flow to the downstream 
States of the Missouri River.
    (c) State Water Rights.--The results of the study shall not affect, 
and shall not be taken into consideration in, any proceeding to 
quantify the water rights of any State.
    (d) Indian Water Rights.--The results of the study shall not 
affect, and shall not be taken into consideration in, any proceeding to 
quantify the water rights of any Indian Tribe or tribal nation.

SEC. 609. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) Secretary.--There are authorized to be appropriated to the 
Secretary such sums as are necessary--
        (1) to pay the administrative expenses incurred by the 
    Secretary in carrying out this title;
        (2) to fund the implementation of terrestrial wildlife habitat 
    restoration plans under section 602(a) and other activities under 
    sections 603(d)(3) and 604(d)(3); and
        (3) to fund the annual expenses (not to exceed the Federal cost 
    as of the date of enactment of this Act) of operating recreation 
    areas to be transferred under sections 605(c) and 606(c) or leased 
    by the State of South Dakota or Indian Tribes, until such time as 
    the trust funds under sections 603 and 604 are fully capitalized.
    (b) Secretary of the Interior.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to the Secretary of the Interior such sums as are 
necessary to pay the administrative expenses incurred by the Secretary 
of the Interior in carrying out this title.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.