[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1480 Introduced in House (IH)]







106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1480

 To provide for the conservation and development of water and related 
 resources, to authorize the United States Army Corps of Engineers to 
 construct various projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of 
               the United States, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 20, 1999

 Mr. Shuster introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the 
 Committee on Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by 
the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
 To provide for the conservation and development of water and related 
 resources, to authorize the United States Army Corps of Engineers to 
 construct various projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of 
               the United States, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999''.
    (b) Table of Contents.--

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Secretary defined.
                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

Sec. 101. Project authorizations.
Sec. 102. Small flood control projects.
Sec. 103. Small bank stabilization projects.
Sec. 104. Small navigation projects.
Sec. 105. Small projects for improvement of the environment.
Sec. 106. Small aquatic ecosystem restoration projects.
                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 201. Small flood control authority.
Sec. 202. Use of non-Federal funds for compiling and disseminating 
                            information on floods and flood damages.
Sec. 203. Contributions by States and political subdivisions.
Sec. 204. Sediment decontamination technology.
Sec. 205. Control of aquatic plants.
Sec. 206. Use of continuing contracts required for construction of 
                            certain projects.
Sec. 207. Support of Army civil works program.
Sec. 208. Water resources development studies for the Pacific region.
Sec. 209. Everglades and south Florida ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 210. Beneficial uses of dredged material.
Sec. 211. Harbor cost sharing.
Sec. 212. Aquatic ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 213. Watershed management, restoration, and development.
Sec. 214. Flood mitigation and riverine restoration pilot program.
Sec. 215. Shoreline management program.
Sec. 216. Assistance for remediation, restoration, and reuse.
Sec. 217. Shore damage mitigation.
Sec. 218. Shore protection.
Sec. 219. Flood prevention coordination.
Sec. 220. Annual passes for recreation.
Sec. 221. Cooperative agreements for environmental and recreational 
                            measures.
Sec. 222. Nonstructural flood control projects.
Sec. 223. Lakes program.
Sec. 224. Construction of flood control projects by non-Federal 
                            interests.
Sec. 225. Enhancement of fish and wildlife resources.
Sec. 226. Sense of Congress; requirement regarding notice.
Sec. 227. Periodic beach nourishment.
Sec. 228. Environmental dredging.
                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

Sec. 301. Missouri River Levee System.
Sec. 302. Ouzinkie Harbor, Alaska.
Sec. 303. Greers Ferry Lake, Arkansas.
Sec. 304. Ten- and Fifteen-Mile Bayous, Arkansas.
Sec. 305. Loggy Bayou, Red River below Denison Dam, Arkansas, 
                            Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas.
Sec. 306. Sacramento River, Glenn-Colusa, California.
Sec. 307. San Lorenzo River, California.
Sec. 308. Terminus Dam, Kaweah River, California.
Sec. 309. Delaware River mainstem and channel deepening, Delaware, New 
                            Jersey, and Pennsylvania.
Sec. 310. Potomac River, Washington, District of Columbia.
Sec. 311. Brevard County, Florida.
Sec. 312. Broward County and Hillsboro Inlet, Florida.
Sec. 313. Fort Pierce, Florida.
Sec. 314. Nassau County, Florida.
Sec. 315. Miami Harbor Channel, Florida.
Sec. 316. Lake Michigan, Illinois.
Sec. 317. Springfield, Illinois.
Sec. 318. Little Calumet River, Indiana.
Sec. 319. Ogden Dunes, Indiana.
Sec. 320. Saint Joseph River, South Bend, Indiana.
Sec. 321. White River, Indiana.
Sec. 322. Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana.
Sec. 323. Larose to Golden Meadow, Louisiana.
Sec. 324. Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee, Louisiana.
Sec. 325. Twelve-mile Bayou, Caddo Parish, Louisiana.
Sec. 326. West Bank of the Mississippi River (East of Harvey Canal), 
                            Louisiana.
Sec. 327. Tolchester Channel, Baltimore Harbor and channels, Chesapeake 
                            Bay, Kent County, Maryland.
Sec. 328. Sault Sainte Marie, Chippewa County, Michigan.
Sec. 329. Jackson County, Mississippi.
Sec. 330. Tunica Lake, Mississippi.
Sec. 331. Bois Brule Drainage and Levee District, Missouri.
Sec. 332. Meramec River Basin, Valley Park Levee, Missouri.
Sec. 333. Missouri River mitigation project, Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, 
                            and Nebraska.
Sec. 334. Wood River, Grand Island, Nebraska.
Sec. 335. Absecon Island, New Jersey.
Sec. 336. New York Harbor and Adjacent Channels, Port Jersey, New 
                            Jersey
Sec. 337. Passaic River, New Jersey.
Sec. 338. Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, New Jersey.
Sec. 339. Arthur Kill, New York and New Jersey.
Sec. 340. New York City watershed.
Sec. 341. New York State Canal System.
Sec. 342. Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, New york.
Sec. 343. Broken Bow Lake, Red River Basin, Oklahoma.
Sec. 344. Willamette River temperature control, Mckenzie Subbasin, 
                            Oregon.
Sec. 345. Aylesworth Creek Reservoir, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 346. Curwensville Lake, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 347. Delaware River, Pennsylvania and Delaware.
Sec. 348. Mussers Dam, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 349. Nine-Mile Run, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 350. Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 351. South Central Pennsylvania.
Sec. 352. Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, South Carolina.
Sec. 353. Bowie County Levee, Texas.
Sec. 354. Clear Creek, Texas.
Sec. 355. Cypress Creek, Texas.
Sec. 356. Dallas Floodway Extension, Dallas, Texas.
Sec. 357. Upper Jordan River, Utah.
Sec. 358. Elizabeth River, Chesapeake, Virginia.
Sec. 359. Bluestone Lake, Ohio River Basin, West Virginia.
Sec. 360. Greenbrier Basin, West Virginia.
Sec. 361. Moorefield, West Virginia.
Sec. 362. West Virginia and Pennsylvania Flood Control.
Sec. 363. Project reauthorizations.
Sec. 364. Project deauthorizations.
Sec. 365. American and Sacramento Rivers, California.
Sec. 366. Martin, Kentucky.
                           TITLE IV--STUDIES

Sec. 401. Upper Mississippi and Illinois Rivers levees and streambanks 
                            protection.
Sec. 402. Upper Mississippi River comprehensive plan.
Sec. 403. El Dorado, Union County, Arkansas.
Sec. 404. Sweetwater Reservoir, San Diego County, California.
Sec. 405. Whitewater River Basin, California.
Sec. 406. Little Econlackhatchee River Basin, Florida.
Sec. 407. Port Everglades Inlet, Florida.
Sec. 408. Upper Des Plaines River and tributaries, Illinois and 
                            Wisconsin.
Sec. 409. Cameron Parish west of Calcasieu River, Louisiana.
Sec. 410. Grand Isle and vicinity, Louisiana.
Sec. 411. Lake Pontchartrain seawall, Louisiana.
Sec. 412. Westport, Massachusetts.
Sec. 413. Southwest Valley, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Sec. 414. Cayuga Creek, New York.
Sec. 415. Arcola Creek Watershed, Madison, Ohio.
Sec. 416. Western Lake Erie Basin, Ohio, Indiana, and Michigan.
Sec. 417. Schuylkill River, Norristown, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 418. Lakes Marion and Moultrie, South Carolina.
Sec. 419. Day County, South Dakota.
Sec. 420. Corpus Christi, Texas.
Sec. 421. Mitchell's Cut Channel (Caney Fork Cut), Texas.
Sec. 422. Mouth of Colorado River, Texas.
Sec. 423. Kanawha River, Fayette County, West Virginia.
Sec. 424. West Virginia ports.
Sec. 425. Great Lakes region comprehensive study.
Sec. 426. Nutrient loading resulting from dredged material diposal.
                   TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Sec. 501. Corps assumption of NRCS projects.
Sec. 502. Construction assistance.
Sec. 503. Contaminated sediment dredging technology.
Sec. 504. Dam safety.
Sec. 505. Great Lakes remedial action plans.
Sec. 506. Sea Lamprey control measures in the Great Lakes.
Sec. 507. Maintenance of navigation channels.
Sec. 508. Measurement of Lake Michigan diversions.
Sec. 509. Upper Mississippi River environmental management program.
Sec. 510. Atlantic Coast of New York monitoring.
Sec. 511. Water control management.
Sec. 512. Beneficial use of dredged material.
Sec. 513. Design and construction assistance.
Sec. 514. Lower Missouri River aquatic restoration projects.
Sec. 515. Aquatic resources restoration in the Northwest.
Sec. 516. Innovative technologies for watershed restoration.
Sec. 517. Environmental restoration.
Sec. 518. Expedited consideration of certain projects.
Sec. 519. Dog River, Alabama.
Sec. 520. Elba, Alabama.
Sec. 521. Geneva, Alabama.
Sec. 522. Navajo Reservation, Arizona, New Mexico, and Utah.
Sec. 523. Augusta and Devalls Bluff, Arkansas.
Sec. 524. Beaver Lake, Arkansas.
Sec. 525. Beaver Lake trout production facility, Arkansas.
Sec. 526. Chino Dairy Preserve, California.
Sec. 527. Novato, California.
Sec. 528. Orange and San Diego Counties, California.
Sec. 529. Salton Sea, California.
Sec. 530. Santa Cruz Harbor, California.
Sec. 531. Point Beach, Milford, Connecticut.
Sec. 532. Lower St. Johns River Basin, Florida.
Sec. 533. Shoreline protection and environmental restoration, Lake 
                            Allatoona, Georgia.
Sec. 534. Mayo's Bar Lock and Dam, Coosa River, Rome, Georgia.
Sec. 535. Comprehensive flood impact response modeling system, 
                            Coralville Reservoir and Iowa River 
                            Watershed, Iowa.
Sec. 536. Additional construction assistance in Illinois.
Sec. 537. Kanopolis Lake, Kansas.
Sec. 538. Southern and Eastern Kentucky.
Sec. 539. Southeast Louisiana.
Sec. 540. Snug Harbor, Maryland.
Sec. 541. Welch Point, Elk River, Cecil County, and Chesapeake City, 
                            Maryland.
Sec. 542. West View Shores, Cecil County, Maryland.
Sec. 543. Restoration projects for Maryland, Pennsylvania, and West 
                            Virginia.
Sec. 544. Cape Cod Canal Railroad Bridge, Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts.
Sec. 545. St. Louis, Missouri.
Sec. 546. Beaver Branch of Big Timber Creek, New Jersey.
Sec. 547. Lake Ontario and St. Lawrence River water levels, New York.
Sec. 548. New York-New Jersey Harbor, New York and New Jersey.
Sec. 549. Sea Gate Reach, Coney Island, New York, New York.
Sec. 550. Woodlawn, New York.
Sec. 551. Floodplain mapping, New York.
Sec. 552. White Oak River, North Carolina.
Sec. 553. Toussaint River, Carroll Township, Ottawa County, Ohio.
Sec. 554. Sardis Reservoir, Oklahoma.
Sec. 555. Waurika Lake, Oklahoma, water conveyance facilities.
Sec. 556. Skinner Butte Park, Eugene, Oregon.
Sec. 557. Willamette River basin, Oregon.
Sec. 558. Bradford and Sullivan Counties, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 559. Erie Harbor, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 560. Point Marion Lock And Dam, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 561. Seven Points' Harbor, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 562. Southeastern Pennsylvania.
Sec. 563. Upper Susquehanna-Lackawanna watershed restoration 
                            initiative.
Sec. 564. Aguadilla Harbor, Puerto Rico.
Sec. 565. Oahe Dam to Lake Sharpe, South Dakota, study.
Sec. 566. Integrated water management planning, Texas.
Sec. 567. Bolivar Peninsula, Jefferson, Chambers, and Galveston 
                            Counties, Texas.
Sec. 568. Galveston Beach, Galveston County, Texas.
Sec. 569. Packery Channel, Corpus Christi, Texas.
Sec. 570. Northern West Virginia.
Sec. 571. Urbanized peak flood management research.
Sec. 572. Mississippi River Commission.
Sec. 573. Coastal aquatic habitat management.
Sec. 574. Recreation user fees initiative.
Sec. 575. Abandoned and inactive noncoal mine restoration.
Sec. 576. Beneficial use of waste tire rubber.
Sec. 577. Site designation.
Sec. 578. Land conveyances.
Sec. 579. Namings.
Sec. 580. Folsom Dam and Reservoir additional storage and water supply 
                            studies.
Sec. 581. Water resources development.
Sec. 582. Allocation of appropriations.
Sec. 583. Wallops Island, Virginia.

SEC. 2. SECRETARY DEFINED.

    In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the 
Army.

                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

SEC. 101. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) Projects With Chief's Reports.--The following projects for 
water resources development and conservation and other purposes are 
authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in 
accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, described in 
the respective reports designated in this subsection:
            (1) Sand point harbor, alaska.--The project for navigation, 
        Sand Point Harbor, Alaska: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
        dated October 13, 1998, at a total cost of $11,760,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $6,964,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $4,796,000.
            (2) Rio salado, salt river, phoenix and tempe, arizona.--
        The project for flood control and environmental restoration, 
        Rio Salado, Salt River, Phoenix and Tempe, Arizona: Report of 
        the Chief of Engineers dated August 20, 1998, at a total cost 
        of $88,048,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $56,355,000 
        and an estimated non-Federal cost of $31,693,000.
            (3) Tucson drainage area, arizona.--The project for flood 
        control, Tucson drainage area, Arizona: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers, dated May 20, 1998, at a total cost of $29,900,000, 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $16,768,000 and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $13,132,000.
            (4) American river watershed, california.--
                    (A) In general.--The Folsom Dam Modification 
                portion of the Folsom Modification Plan described in 
                the United States Army Corps of Engineers Supplemental 
                Information Report for the American River Watershed 
                Project, California, dated March 1996, as modified by 
                the report entitled ``Folsom Dam Modification Report, 
                New Outlets Plan,'' dated March 1998, prepared by the 
                Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency, at an estimated 
                cost of $150,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
                $97,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
                $52,500,000. The Secretary shall coordinate with the 
                Secretary of the Interior with respect to the design 
                and construction of modifications at Folsom Dam 
                authorized by this paragraph.
                    (B) Reoperation measures.--Upon completion of the 
                improvements to Folsom Dam authorized by subparagraph 
                (A), the variable space allocated to flood control 
                within the Reservoir shall be reduced from the current 
                operating range of 400,000-670,000 acre-feet to 
                400,000-600,000 acre-feet.
                    (C) Cost of folsom reservoir reoperation 
                measures.--Section 101(a)(1)(D)(ii) of the Water 
                Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3662-3663) 
                is amended by striking ``during'' and all that follows 
                through ``thereafter''.
                    (D) Makeup of water shortages caused by flood 
                control operation.--
                            (i) In general.--The Secretary of the 
                        Interior shall enter into, or modify, such 
                        agreements with the Sacramento Area Flood 
                        Control Agency regarding the operation of 
                        Folsom Dam and reservoir as may be necessary in 
                        order that, notwithstanding any prior agreement 
                        or provision of law, 100 percent of the water 
                        needed to make up for any water shortage caused 
                        by variable flood control operation during any 
                        year at Folsom Dam and resulting in a 
                        significant impact on recreation at Folsom 
                        Reservoir shall be replaced, to the extent the 
                        water is available for purchase, by the 
                        Secretary of the Interior.
                            (ii) Cost sharing.--Seventy-five percent of 
                        the costs of the replacement water provided 
                        under clause (i) shall be paid for on a non-
                        reimbursable basis by the Secretary of the 
                        Interior at Federal expense. The remaining 25 
                        percent of such costs shall be provided by the 
                        Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency.
                            (iii) Limitation.--To the extent that any 
                        funds in excess of the non-Federal share are 
                        provided by the Sacramento Area Flood Control 
                        Agency, the Secretary shall reimburse such non-
                        Federal interests for such excess funds. Costs 
                        for replacement water may not exceed 125 
                        percent of the current average market price for 
                        raw water, as determined by the Secretary of 
                        the Interior.
                    (E) Significant impact on recreation.--For the 
                purposes of this paragraph, a significant impact on 
                recreation is defined as any impact that results in a 
                lake elevation at Folsom Reservoir below 435 feet above 
                sea level starting on May 15 and ending on September 15 
                of any given year.
                    (F) Evaluation.--For purposes of this paragraph, in 
                evaluating the impacts on recreation at Folsom 
                Reservoir caused by the variable flood control 
                operation of Folsom Dam, the Secretary shall take into 
                consideration the effect of measures authorized by 
                section 581(b) of this Act.
            (5) South sacramento county streams, california.--The 
        project for flood control, environmental restoration and 
        recreation, South Sacramento County streams, California: Report 
        of the Chief of Engineers dated October 6, 1998, at a 
total cost of $65,500,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$41,200,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $24,300,000.
            (6) Upper guadalupe river, california.--The project for 
        flood control and recreation, Upper Guadalupe River, 
        California: Locally Preferred Plan (known as the ``Bypass 
        Channel Plan''), Report of the Chief of Engineers dated August 
        19, 1998, at a total cost of $140,285,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $44,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $96,285,000.
            (7) Yuba river basin, california.--The project for flood 
        control, Yuba River Basin, California: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated November 25, 1998, at a total cost of 
        $26,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $17,350,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $9,250,000.
            (8) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new jersey-
        broadkill beach, delaware.--The project for hurricane and storm 
        damage reduction, Delaware Bay coastline, Delaware and New 
        Jersey-Broadkill Beach, Delaware: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated August 17, 1998, at a total cost of $9,049,000, 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $5,674,000 and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $3,375,000, and at an estimated average 
        annual cost of $538,200 for periodic nourishment over the 50-
        year life of the project, with an estimated annual Federal cost 
        of $349,800 and an estimated annual non-Federal cost of 
        $188,400.
            (9) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new jersey-port 
        mahon, delaware.--The project for ecosystem restoration, 
        Delaware Bay coastline, Delaware and New Jersey-Port Mahon, 
        Delaware: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated September 28, 
        1998, at a total cost of $7,644,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $4,969,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $2,675,000, and at an estimated average annual cost of $234,000 
        for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, 
        with an estimated annual Federal cost of $152,000 and an 
        estimated annual non-Federal cost of $82,000.
            (10) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new jersey-
        roosevelt inlet-lewes beach, delaware.--The project for 
        navigation mitigation and hurricane and storm damage reduction, 
        Delaware Bay coastline, Delaware and New Jersey-Roosevelt 
        Inlet-Lewes Beach, Delaware: Report of the Chief of Engineers 
        dated February 3, 1999, at a total cost of $3,393,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $2,620,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $773,000, and at an estimated average annual 
        cost of $196,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life 
        of the project, with an estimated annual Federal cost of 
        $152,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal cost of $44,000.
            (11) Tampa harbor-big bend channel, florida.--The project 
        for navigation, Tampa Harbor-Big Bend Channel, Florida: Report 
        of the Chief of Engineers dated October 13, 1998, at a total 
        cost of $9,356,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $6,235,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,121,000.
            (12) Brunswick harbor, georgia.--The project for 
        navigation, Brunswick Harbor, Georgia: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated October 6, 1998, at a total cost of 
        $50,717,000, with an estimate Federal cost of $32,966,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $17,751,000.
            (13) Beargrass creek, kentucky.--The project for flood 
        control, Beargrass Creek, Kentucky: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers, dated May 12, 1998, at a total cost of $11,171,300, 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $7,261,500 and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $3,909,800.
            (14) Amite river and tributaries, louisiana.--The project 
        for flood control, Amite River and tributaries, Louisiana: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers dated December 23, 1996, at a 
        total cost of $112,900,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $84,675,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $28,225,000. 
        Cost sharing for the project shall be determined in accordance 
        with section 103(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
        1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213), as in effect on October 11, 1996.
            (15) Baltimore harbor anchorages and channels, maryland and 
        virginia.--The project for navigation, Baltimore harbor 
        anchorages and channels, Maryland and Virginia: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers, dated June 8, 1998, at a total cost of 
        $28,430,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $19,000,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $9,430,000.
            (16) Red river lake at crookston, minnesota.--The project 
        for flood control, Red River Lake at Crookston, Minnesota: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated April 20, 1998, at a 
        total cost of $8,950,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
of $5,720,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,230,000.
            (17) Lower cape may meadows, cape may point, new jersey.--
        The project for navigation mitigation, ecosystem restoration, 
        and hurricane and storm damage reduction, Lower Cape May 
        Meadows, Cape May Point, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated April 5, 1999, at a total cost of $15,952,000, 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $12,118,000 and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $3,834,000, and at an estimated average 
        annual cost of $1,114,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-
        year life of the project, with an estimated annual Federal cost 
        of $897,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal cost of 
        $217,000.
            (18) New jersey shore protection: townsends inlet to cape 
        may inlet, new jersey.--The project for hurricane and storm 
        damage reduction and ecosystem restoration, New Jersey Shore 
        Protection: Townsends Inlet to Cape May Inlet, New Jersey: 
        Report of the Chief of Engineers dated September 28, 1998, at a 
        total cost of $56,503,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $36,727,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $19,776,000, 
        and at an estimated average annual cost of $2,000,000 for 
        periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with 
        an estimated annual Federal cost of $1,300,000 and an estimated 
        annual non-Federal cost of $700,000.
            (19) Guanajibo river, puerto rico.--The project for flood 
        control, Guanajibo River, Puerto Rico: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers, dated February 27, 1996, at a total cost of 
        $27,031,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $20,273,250 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $6,757,750. Cost sharing for 
        the project shall be determined in accordance with section 
        103(a) of the Water Resources Development Act 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
        2213) as in effect on October 11, 1986.
            (20) Rio grande de manati, barceloneta, puerto rico.--The 
        project for flood control, Rio Grande De Manati, Barceloneta, 
        Puerto Rico: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated January 
        22, 1999, at a total cost of $13,491,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $8,785,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $4,706,000.
            (21) Rio nigua at salinas, puerto rico.--The project for 
        flood control, Rio Nigua at Salinas, Puerto Rico: Report of the 
        Chief of Engineers, dated April 15, 1997, at a total cost of 
        $13,702,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $7,645,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $6,057,000.
            (22) Salt creek, graham, texas.--The project for flood 
        control, environmental restoration and recreation, Salt Creek, 
        Graham, Texas: Report of the Chief of Engineers dated October 
        6, 1998, at a total cost of $10,080,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $6,560,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $3,520,000.
    (b) Projects Subject to Report.--The following projects for water 
resources development and conservation and other purposes are 
authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in 
accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, recommended 
in a final report of the Corps of Engineers, if the report is completed 
not later than September 30, 1999.
            (1) Nome, alaska.--The project for navigation, Nome, 
        Alaska, at a total cost of $24,608,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $19,660,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $4,948,000.
            (2) Seward harbor, alaska.--The project for navigation, 
        Seward Harbor, Alaska, at a total cost of $12,240,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $4,364,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $7,876,000.
            (3) Hamilton airfield, california.--The project for 
        wetlands restoration, Hamilton Airfield, California, at a total 
        cost of $55,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $41,400,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $13,800,000.
            (4) Oakland harbor, california.--The project for 
        navigation, Oakland Harbor, California, at a total cost of 
        $256,650,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $143,450,000 
        and an estimated non-Federal cost of $113,200,000.
            (5) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new jersey: reeds 
        beach and pierces point, new jersey.--The project for shore 
        protection and ecosystem restoration, Delaware Bay Coastline, 
        Delaware and New Jersey: Reeds Beach and Pierces Point, New 
        Jersey, at a total cost of $4,057,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $2,637,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $1,420,000.
            (6) Delaware bay coastline, delaware and new jersey: villas 
        and vicinity, new jersey.--The project for shore protection and 
        ecosystem restoration, Delaware Bay Coastline, Delaware and New 
        Jersey: Villas and Vicinity, New Jersey, at a total cost of 
        $7,520,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $4,888,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $2,632,000.
            (7) Delaware coast from cape henelopen to fenwick island, 
        bethany beach/south bethany beach, delaware.--The project for 
        hurricane and storm damage reduction, Delaware Coast from Cape 
        Henelopen to Fenwick Island, Bethany Beach/South Bethany Beach, 
        Delaware, at a total cost of $22,205,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $14,433,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $7,772,000, and at an estimated average annual cost of 
        $1,584,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of 
        the project, with an estimated annual Federal cost of 
        $1,030,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal cost of 
        $554,000.
            (8) Jacksonville harbor, florida.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for navigation, 
                Jacksonville Harbor, Florida, at a total cost of 
                $26,116,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
                $9,129,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
                $16,987,000.
                    (B) Special rule.--Notwithstanding subparagraph 
                (A), the Secretary may construct the project to a depth 
                of 40 feet if the non-Federal interest agrees to pay 
                any additional costs above those for the recommended 
                plan.
            (9) Little talbot island, duval county, florida.--The 
        project for hurricane and storm damage prevention, Little 
        Talbot Island, Duval County, Florida, at a total cost of 
        $5,915,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $3,839,000 and an 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $2,076,000.
            (10) Ponce de leon inlet, florida.--The project for 
        navigation and related purposes, Ponce de Leon Inlet, Volusia 
        County, Florida, at a total cost of $5,454,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $2,988,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $2,466,000.
            (11) Savannah harbor expansion, georgia.--
                    (A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B), the 
                project for navigation, Savannah Harbor expansion, 
                Georgia, including implementation of the mitigation 
                plan, with such modifications as the Secretary deems 
                appropriate, at a total cost of $230,174,000 (of which 
                amount a portion is authorized for implementation of 
                the mitigation plan), with an estimated Federal cost of 
                $145,160,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
                $85,014,000.
                    (B) Conditions.--The project authorized by 
                subparagraph (A) may be carried out only after--
                            (i) the Secretary, in consultation with 
                        affected Federal, State, regional, and local 
                        entities, has reviewed and approved an 
                        environmental impact statement for the project 
                        that includes--
                                    (I) an analysis of the impacts of 
                                project depth alternatives ranging from 
                                42 feet through 48 feet; and
                                    (II) a selected plan for navigation 
                                and an associated mitigation plan as 
                                required by section 906(a) of the Water 
                                Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
                                U.S.C. 2283); and
                            (ii) the Secretary of the Interior, the 
                        Secretary of Commerce, the Administrator of the 
                        Environmental Protection Agency, and the 
                        Secretary have approved the selected plan and 
                        have determined that the mitigation plan 
                        adequately addresses the potential 
                        environmental impacts of the project.
                    (C) Mitigation requirements.--The mitigation plan 
                shall be implemented in advance of or concurrently with 
                construction of the project.
            (12) Des plaines river, illinois.--The project for flood 
        control, Des Plaines River, Illinois, at a total cost of 
        $44,300,000 with an estimated Federal cost of $28,800,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $15,500,000.
            (13) New jersey shore protection, brigantine inlet to great 
        egg harbor, brigantine island, new jersey.--The project for 
        hurricane and storm damage reduction, New Jersey shore 
        protection, Brigantine Inlet to Great Egg Harbor, Brigantine 
        Island, New Jersey, at a total cost of $4,970,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $3,230,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $1,740,000, and at an estimated average annual 
        cost of $465,000 for periodic nourishment over the 50-year life 
        of the project, with an estimated annual Federal cost of 
        $302,000 and an estimated annual non-Federal cost of $163,000.
            (14) Columbia river channel, oregon and washington.--The 
        project for navigation, Columbia River Channel, Oregon and 
        Washington, at a total cost of $183,623,000 with an estimated 
        Federal cost $106,132,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $77,491,000.
            (15) Johnson creek, arlington, texas.--The locally 
        preferred project for flood control, Johnson Creek, Arlington, 
        Texas, at a total cost of $20,300,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $12,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $8,300,000.
            (16) Howard hanson dam, washington.--The project for water 
        supply and ecosystem restoration, Howard Hanson Dam, 
        Washington, at a total cost of $75,600,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $36,900,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $38,700,000.

SEC. 102. SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of 
the following projects and, after completion of such study, shall carry 
out the project under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 
U.S.C. 701s):
            (1) Lancaster, california.--Project for flood control, 
        Lancaster, California, westside stormwater retention facility.
            (2) Gateway triangle area, florida.--Project for flood 
        control, Gateway Triangle area, Collier County, Florida.
            (3) Plant city, florida.--Project for flood control, Plant 
        City, Florida.
            (4) Stone island, lake monroe, florida.--Project for flood 
        control, Stone Island, Lake Monroe, Florida.
            (5) Ohio river, illinois.--Project for flood control, Ohio 
        River, Illinois.
            (6) Repaupo creek, new jersey.--Project for flood control, 
        Repaupo Creek, New Jersey.
            (7) Owasco lake seawall, new york.--Project for flood 
        control, Owasco Lake seawall, New York.
            (8) Port clinton, ohio.--Project for flood control, Port 
        Clinton, Ohio.
            (9) North canadian river, oklahoma.--Project for flood 
        control, North Canadian River, Oklahoma.
            (10) Abington township, pennsylvania.--Project for flood 
        control, Baeder and Wanamaker Roads, Abington Township, 
        Pennsylvania.
            (11) Port indian, west norriton township, montgomery 
        county, pennsylvania.--Project for flood control, Port Indian, 
        West Norriton Township, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania.
            (12) Port providence, upper providence township, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for flood control, Port Providence, 
        Upper Providence Township, Pennsylvania.
            (13) Springfield township, montgomery county, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for flood control, Springfield Township, 
        Montgomery County, Pennsylvania.
            (14) First creek, knoxville, tennessee.--Project for flood 
        control, First Creek, Knoxville, Tennessee.
            (15) Metro center levee, cumberland river, nashville, 
        tennessee.--Project for flood control, Metro Center Levee, 
        Cumberland River, Nashville, Tennessee.
    (b) Festus and Crystal City, Missouri.--
            (1) Maximum federal expenditure.--The maximum amount of 
        Federal funds that may be expended for the project for flood 
        control, Festus and Crystal City, Missouri, shall be 
        $10,000,000.
            (2) Revision of project cooperation agreement.--The 
        Secretary shall revise the project cooperation agreement for 
        the project referred to in paragraph (1) to take into account 
        the change in the Federal participation in such project 
        pursuant to paragraph (1).
            (3) Cost sharing.--Nothing in this section shall be 
        construed to affect any cost-sharing requirement applicable to 
        the project referred to in paragraph (1) under the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986.

 SEC. 103. SMALL BANK STABILIZATION PROJECTS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, after completion of such study, shall carry out the 
project under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 
701r):
            (1) Saint joseph river, indiana.--Project for streambank 
        erosion control, Saint Joseph River, Indiana.
            (2) Big timber creek, new jersey.--Project for streambank 
        erosion control, Big Timber Creek, New Jersey.
            (3) Lake shore road, athol springs, new york.--Project for 
        streambank erosion control, Lake Shore Road, Athol Springs, New 
        York.
            (4) Marist college, poughkeepsie, new york.--Project for 
        streambank erosion control, Marist College, Poughkeepsie, New 
        York.
            (5) Monroe county, ohio.--Project for streambank erosion 
        control, Monroe County, Ohio.
            (6) Green valley, west virginia.--Project for streambank 
        erosion control, Green Valley, West Virginia.

 SEC. 104. SMALL NAVIGATION PROJECTS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, after completion of such study, shall carry out the 
project under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 
U.S.C. 577):
            (1) Grand marais, arkansas.--Project for navigation, Grand 
        Marais, Arkansas.
            (2) Fields landing channel, humboldt harbor, california.--
        Project for navigation, Fields Landing Channel, Humboldt 
        Harbor, California.
            (3) San mateo (pillar point harbor), california.--Project 
        for navigation San Mateo (Pillar Point Harbor), California.
            (4) Agana marina, guam.--Project for navigation, Agana 
        Marina, Guam.
            (5) Agat marina, guam.--Project for navigation, Agat 
        Marina, Guam.
            (6) Apra harbor fuel piers, guam.--Project for navigation, 
        Apra Harbor Fuel Piers, Guam.
            (7) Apra harbor pier f-6, guam.--Project for navigation, 
        Apra Harbor Pier F-6, Guam.
            (8) Apra harbor seawall, guam.--Project for navigation 
        including a seawall, Apra Harbor, Guam.
            (9) Guam harbor, guam.--Project for navigation, Guam 
        Harbor, Guam.
            (10) Illinois river near chautauqua park, illinois.--
        Project for navigation, Illinois River near Chautauqua Park, 
        Illinois.
            (11) Whiting shoreline waterfront, whiting, indiana.--
        Project for navigation, Whiting Shoreline Waterfront, Whiting, 
        Indiana.
            (12) Naraguagus river, machias, maine.--Project for 
        navigation, Naraguagus River, Machias, Maine.
            (13) Union river, ellsworth, maine.--Project for 
        navigation, Union River, Ellsworth, Maine.
            (14) Fortescue inlet, delaware bay, new jersey.--Project 
        for navigation for Fortescue Inlet, Delaware Bay, New Jersey.
            (15) Buffalo and lasalle park, new york.--Project for 
        navigation, Buffalo and LaSalle Park, New York.
            (16) Sturgeon point, new york.--Project for navigation, 
        Sturgeon Point, New York.

SEC. 105. SMALL PROJECTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of 
the following projects and, after completion of such study, shall carry 
out the project under section 1135 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a):
            (1) Illinois river in the vicinity of havana, illinois.--
        Project for the improvement of the environment, Illinois River 
        in the vicinity of Havana, Illinois.
            (2) Knitting mill creek, virginia.--Project for the 
        improvement of the environment, Knitting Mill Creek, Virginia.
    (b) Pine Flat Dam, Kings River, California.--The Secretary shall 
carry out under section 1135(a) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a(a)) a project to construct a turbine bypass at 
Pine Flat Dam, Kings River, California, in accordance with the Project 
Modification Report and Environmental Assessment dated September 1996.

SEC. 106. SMALL AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROJECTS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, after completion of such study, shall carry out the 
project under section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330):
            (1) Contra costa county, bay delta, california.--Project 
        for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Contra Costa County, Bay 
        Delta, California.
            (2) Indian river, florida.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration and lagoon restoration, Indian River, Florida.
            (3) Little wekiva river, florida.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration and erosion control, Little Wekiva River, 
        Florida.
            (4) Cook county, illinois.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration and lagoon restoration and protection, Cook County, 
        Illinois.
            (5) Grand batture island, mississippi.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Grand Batture Island, Mississippi.
            (6) Hancock, harrison, and jackson counties, mississippi.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration and reef restoration 
        along the Gulf Coast, Hancock, Harrison, and Jackson Counties, 
        Mississippi.
            (7) Mississippi river and river des peres, st. louis, 
        missouri.--Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration and 
        recreation, Mississippi River and River Des Peres, St. Louis, 
        Missouri.
            (8) Hudson river, new york.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Hudson River, New York.
            (9) Oneida lake, new york.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Oneida Lake, Oneida County, New York.
            (10) Otsego lake, new york.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Otsego Lake, Otsego County, New York.
            (11) North fork of yellow creek, ohio.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, North Fork of Yellow Creek, Ohio.
            (12) Wheeling creek watershed, ohio.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Wheeling Creek watershed, Ohio.
            (13) Springfield millrace, oregon.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Springfield Millrace, Oregon.
            (14) Upper amazon creek, oregon.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Upper Amazon Creek, Oregon.
            (15) Lake ontelaunee reservoir, berks county, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration and 
        distilling pond facilities, Lake Ontelaunee Reservoir, Berks 
        County, Pennsylvania.
            (16) Blackstone river basin, rhode island and 
        massachusetts.--Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration and 
        fish passage facilities, Blackstone River Basin, Rhode Island 
        and Massachusetts.

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

SEC. 201. SMALL FLOOD CONTROL AUTHORITY.

    Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``construction of small projects'' and 
        inserting ``implementation of small structural and 
        nonstructural projects''; and
            (2) by striking ``$5,000,000'' and inserting 
        ``$7,000,000''.

SEC. 202. USE OF NON-FEDERAL FUNDS FOR COMPILING AND DISSEMINATING 
              INFORMATION ON FLOODS AND FLOOD DAMAGES.

    The last sentence of section 206(b) of the Flood Control Act of 
1960 (33 U.S.C. 709a(b)) is amended by inserting before the period the 
following: ``; except that this limitation on fees shall not apply to 
funds voluntarily contributed by such entities for the purpose of 
expanding the scope of the services requested by such entities''.

SEC. 203. CONTRIBUTIONS BY STATES AND POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS.

    Section 5 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 (33 U.S.C. 
701h), is amended by inserting ``or environmental restoration'' after 
``flood control''.

SEC. 204. SEDIMENT DECONTAMINATION TECHNOLOGY.

    Section 405 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 
U.S.C. 2239 note; 106 Stat. 4863) is amended--
            (1) by adding at the end of subsection (a) the following:
            ``(4) Practical end-use products.--Technologies selected 
        for demonstration at the pilot scale shall be intended to 
        result in practical end-use products.
            ``(5) Assistance by the secretary.--The Secretary shall 
        assist the project to ensure expeditious completion by 
        providing sufficient quantities of contaminated dredged 
        material to conduct the full-scale demonstrations to stated 
        capacity.'';
            (2) in subsection (c) by striking the first sentence and 
        inserting the following: ``There is authorized to be 
        appropriated to carry out this section $22,000,000 to complete 
        technology testing, technology commercialization, and the 
        development of full scale processing facilities within the New 
        York/New Jersey Harbor.''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) Support.--In carrying out the program under this section, the 
Secretary is encouraged to utilize contracts, cooperative agreements, 
and grants with colleges and universities and other non-Federal 
entities.''.

SEC. 205. CONTROL OF AQUATIC PLANTS.

    Section 104 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C. 610) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) by inserting ``arundo,'' after 
        ``milfoil,'';
            (2) in subsection (b) by striking ``$12,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$15,000,000.''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Support.--In carrying out this program, the Secretary is 
encouraged to utilize contracts, cooperative agreements, and grants 
with colleges and universities and other non-Federal entities.''.

SEC. 206. USE OF CONTINUING CONTRACTS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF 
              CERTAIN PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Secretary shall not implement a fully allocated funding policy with 
respect to a water resources project if initiation of construction has 
occurred but sufficient funds are not available to complete the 
project. The Secretary shall enter into continuing contracts for such 
project.
    (b) Initiation of Construction Clarified.--For the purposes of this 
section, initiation of construction for a project occurs on the date of 
enactment of an Act that appropriates funds for the project from 1 of 
the following appropriation accounts:
            (1) Construction, General.
            (2) Operation and Maintenance, General.
            (3) Flood Control, Mississippi River and Tributaries.

SEC. 207. SUPPORT OF ARMY CIVIL WORKS PROGRAM.

    The requirements of section 2361 of title 10, United States Code, 
shall not apply to any contract, cooperative research and development 
agreement, cooperative agreement, or grant entered into under section 
229 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3703) 
between the Secretary and Marshall University or entered into under 
section 350 of this Act between the Secretary and Juniata College.

SEC. 208. WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT STUDIES FOR THE PACIFIC REGION.

    Section 444 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3747) is amended by striking ``interest of navigation'' and 
inserting ``interests of water resources development, including 
navigation, flood damage reduction, and environmental restoration''.

SEC. 209. EVERGLADES AND SOUTH FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

    (a) Program Extension.--Section 528(b)(3) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3769) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B) by striking ``1999'' and inserting 
        ``2000''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (C)(i) by striking ``1999'' and 
        inserting ``2003''.
    (b) Credit.--Section 528(b)(3) of such Act is amended by adding at 
the end the following:
                    ``(D) Credit of past and future activities.--The 
                Secretary may provide a credit to the non-Federal 
                interests toward the non-Federal share of a project 
                implemented under subparagraph (A). The credit shall be 
                for reasonable costs of work performed by the non-
                Federal interests if the Secretary determines that the 
                work substantially expedited completion of the project 
                and is compatible with and an integral part of the 
                project, and the credit is provided pursuant to a 
                specific project cooperation agreement.''.
    (c) Caloosahatchee River Basin, Florida.--Section 528(e)(4) of such 
Act is amended by inserting before the period at the end of the first 
sentence the following: ``if the Secretary determines that such land 
acquisition is compatible with and an integral component of the 
Everglades and South Florida ecosystem restoration, including potential 
land acquisition in the Caloosahatchee River basin or other areas''.

SEC. 210. BENEFICIAL USES OF DREDGED MATERIAL.

    Section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4826-4827) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c) by striking ``cooperative agreement 
        in accordance with the requirements of section 221 of the Flood 
        Control Act of 1970'' and inserting ``binding agreement with 
        the Secretary''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) Non-Federal Interests.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), the Secretary, after 
coordination with the appropriate State and local government officials 
having jurisdiction over an area in which a project under this section 
will be carried out, may allow a nonprofit entity to serve as the non-
Federal interest for the project.''.

SEC. 211. HARBOR COST SHARING.

    (a) In General.--Sections 101 and 214 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211 and 2241; P.L. 99-662) are 
amended by striking ``45 feet'' each place it appears and inserting 
``53 feet''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
only apply to a project, or separable element thereof, on which a 
contract for physical construction has not been awarded before the date 
of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 212. AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

    Section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3679-3680) is amended--
            (1) by adding at the end of subsection (b) the following: 
        ``Before October 1, 2003, the Federal share may be provided in 
        the form of grants or reimbursements of project costs.''; and
            (2) by adding at the end of subsection (c) the following: 
        ``Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the Flood Control Act of 
        1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), the Secretary, after coordination 
        with the appropriate State and local government officials 
        having jurisdiction over an area in which a project under this 
        section will be carried out, may allow a nonprofit entity to 
        serve as the non-Federal interest for the project.''.

SEC. 213. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT, RESTORATION, AND DEVELOPMENT.

    (a) Nonprofit Entity as Non-Federal Interest.--Section 503(a) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3756) is amended 
by adding at the end the following: ``Notwithstanding section 221(b) of 
the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), the Secretary, 
after coordination with the appropriate State and local government 
officials having jurisdiction over an area in which a project under 
this section will be carried out, may allow a nonprofit entity to serve 
as the non-Federal interest for the project.''.
    (b) Project Locations.--Section 503(d) of such Act is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (7) by inserting before the period at the 
        end ``, including Clear Lake''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(14) Fresno Slough watershed, California.
            ``(15) Hayward Marsh, Southern San Francisco Bay watershed, 
        California.
            ``(16) Kaweah River watershed, California.
            ``(17) Malibu Creek watershed, California.
            ``(18) Illinois River watershed, Illinois.
            ``(19) Catawba River watershed, North Carolina.
            ``(20) Cabin Creek basin, West Virginia.
            ``(21) Lower St. Johns River basin, Florida.''.

SEC. 214. FLOOD MITIGATION AND RIVERINE RESTORATION PILOT PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may undertake a program for the 
purpose of conducting projects that reduce flood hazards and restore 
the natural functions and values of rivers throughout the United 
States.
    (b) Studies and Projects.--
            (1) Authority.--In carrying out the program, the Secretary 
        may conduct studies to identify appropriate flood damage 
        reduction, conservation, and restoration measures and may 
        design and implement projects described in subsection (a).
            (2) Consultation and coordination.--The studies and 
        projects carried out under this section shall be conducted, to 
        the maximum extent practicable, in consultation and 
        coordination with the Federal Emergency Management Agency and 
        other appropriate Federal agencies, and in consultation and 
        coordination with appropriate State, tribal, and local 
        agencies.
            (3) Nonstructural approaches.--The studies and projects 
        shall emphasize, to the maximum extent practicable and 
        appropriate, nonstructural approaches to preventing or reducing 
        flood damages.
            (4) Use of state, tribal, and local studies and projects.--
        The studies and projects shall include consideration of and 
        coordination with any State, tribal, and local flood damage 
        reduction or riverine and wetland restoration studies and 
        projects that conserve, restore, and manage hydrologic and 
        hydraulic regimes and restore the natural functions and values 
        of floodplains.
    (c) Cost-Sharing Requirements.--
            (1) Studies.--Studies conducted under this section shall be 
        subject to cost sharing in accordance with section 105 of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215).
            (2) Environmental restoration and nonstructural flood 
        control projects.--The non-Federal interests shall pay 35 
        percent of the cost of any environmental restoration or 
        nonstructural flood control project carried out under this 
        section. The non-Federal interests shall provide all land, 
        easements, rights-of-way, dredged material disposal areas, and 
        relocations necessary for such projects. The value of such 
        land, easements, rights-of-way, dredged material disposal 
        areas, and relocations shall be credited toward the payment 
        required under this paragraph.
            (3) Structural flood control projects.--Any structural 
        flood control measures carried out under this section shall be 
        subject to cost sharing in accordance with section 103(a) of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
        2213(a)).
            (4) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal interests 
        shall be responsible for all costs associated with operating, 
        maintaining, replacing, repairing, and rehabilitating all 
        projects carried out under this section.
    (d) Project Justification.--
            (1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law 
        or requirement for economic justification established pursuant 
        to section 209 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 
1962-2), the Secretary may implement a project under this section if 
the Secretary determines that the project--
                    (A) will significantly reduce potential flood 
                damages;
                    (B) will improve the quality of the environment; 
                and
                    (C) is justified considering all costs and 
                beneficial outputs of the project.
            (2) Establishment of selection and rating criteria and 
        policies.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment 
        of this section, the Secretary, in cooperation with State, 
        tribal, and local agencies, shall develop, and transmit to the 
        Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
        Works of the Senate, criteria for selecting and rating projects 
        to be carried out under this section and shall establish 
        policies and procedures for carrying out the studies and 
        projects undertaken under this section. Such criteria shall 
        include, as a priority, the extent to which the appropriate 
        State government supports the project.
    (e) Priority Areas.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary 
shall examine the potential for flood damage reductions at appropriate 
locations, including the following:
            (1) Upper Delaware River, New York.
            (2) Willamette River floodplain, Oregon.
            (3) Pima County, Arizona, at Paseo De Las Iglesias and 
        Rillito River.
            (4) Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers, California.
            (5) Murrieta Creek, California.
            (6) Napa County, California, at Yountville, St. Helena, 
        Calistoga, and American Canyon.
            (7) Santa Clara basin, California, at Upper Guadalupe River 
        and tributaries, San Francisquito Creek, and Upper Penitencia 
        Creek.
            (8) Pine Mount Creek, New Jersey.
            (9) Chagrin River, Ohio.
            (10) Blair County, Pennsylvania, at Altoona and Frankstown 
        Township.
            (11) Lincoln Creek, Wisconsin.
    (f) Program Review.--
            (1) In general.--The program established under this section 
        shall be subject to an independent review to evaluate the 
        efficacy of the program in achieving the dual goals of flood 
        hazard mitigation and riverine restoration.
            (2) Report.--Not later than April 15, 2003, the Secretary 
        shall transmit to the Committee on Transportation and 
        Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the 
        Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a 
        report on the findings of the review conducted under this 
        subsection with any recommendations concerning continuation of 
        the program.
    (g) Cost Limitations.--
            (1) Maximum federal cost per project.--No more than 
        $30,000,000 may be expended by the United States on any single 
        project under this section.
            (2) Committee resolution procedure.--
                    (A) Limitation on appropriations.--No appropriation 
                shall be made to construct any project under this 
                section the total Federal cost of construction of which 
                exceeds $15,000,000 if the project has not been 
                approved by resolutions adopted by the Committee on 
                Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
                Representatives and the Committee on Environment and 
                Public Works of the Senate.
                    (B) Report.--For the purpose of securing 
                consideration of approval under this paragraph, the 
                Secretary shall transmit a report on the proposed 
                project, including all relevant data and information on 
                all costs.
    (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section--
            (1) $25,000,000 for fiscal year 2000;
            (2) $25,000,000 for fiscal year 2001 if $12,500,000 or more 
        is appropriated to carry out subsection (e) for fiscal year 
        2000;
            (3) $25,000,000 for fiscal year 2002 if $12,500,000 or more 
        is appropriated to carry out subsection (e) for fiscal year 
        2001; and
            (4) $25,000,000 for fiscal year 2003 if $12,500,000 or more 
        is appropriated to carry out subsection (e) for fiscal year 
        2002.

SEC. 215. SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.

    (a) Review.--The Secretary shall review the implementation of the 
Corps of Engineers' shoreline management program, with particular 
attention to inconsistencies in implementation among the divisions and 
districts of the Corps of Engineers and complaints by or potential 
inequities regarding property owners in the Savannah District including 
an accounting of the number and disposition of complaints over the last 
5 years in the District.
    (b) Report.--As expeditiously as practicable after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report 
describing the results of the review conducted under subsection (a).

SEC. 216. ASSISTANCE FOR REMEDIATION, RESTORATION, AND REUSE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide to State and local 
governments assessment, planning, and design assistance for 
remediation, environmental restoration, or reuse of areas located 
within the boundaries of such State or local governments where such 
remediation, environmental restoration, or reuse will contribute to the 
conservation of water and related resources of drainage basins and 
watersheds within the United States.
    (b) Beneficial Use of Dredged Material.--In providing assistance 
under subsection (a), the Secretary shall encourage the beneficial use 
of dredged material, consistent with the findings of the Secretary 
under section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 
U.S.C. 2326).
    (c) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
assistance provided under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $3,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2000 through 2004.

SEC. 217. SHORE DAMAGE MITIGATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 111 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 
(33 U.S.C. 426i; 100 Stat. 4199) is amended by inserting after 
``navigation works'' the following: ``and shore damages attributable to 
the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway and the Gulf Intracoastal 
Waterway''.
    (b) Palm Beach County, Florida.--The project for navigation, Palm 
Beach County, Florida, authorized by section 2 of the River and Harbor 
Act of March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 11), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to undertake beach nourishment as a dredged material disposal 
option under the project.
    (c) Galveston County, Texas.--The Secretary may place dredged 
material from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway on the beaches along 
Rollover Pass, Galveston County, Texas, to stabilize beach erosion.

SEC. 218. SHORE PROTECTION.

    (a) Non-Federal Share of Periodic Nourishment.--Section 103(d) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4085-5086) is 
amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1) Construction.--'' before ``Costs of 
        constructing'';
            (2) by inserting at the end the following:
            ``(2) Periodic nourishment.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B), the 
                non-Federal share of costs of periodic nourishment 
                measures for shore protection or beach erosion control 
                that are carried out--
                            ``(i) after January 1, 2001, shall be 40 
                        percent;
                            ``(ii) after January 1, 2002, shall be 45 
                        percent; and
                            ``(iii) after January 1, 2003, shall be 50 
                        percent;
                    ``(B) Benefits to privately owned shores.--All 
                costs assigned to benefits of periodic nourishment 
                measures to privately owned shores (where use of such 
                shores is limited to private interests) or to 
                prevention of losses of private lands shall be borne by 
                the non-Federal interest and all costs assigned to the 
                protection of federally owned shores for such measures 
                shall be borne by the United States.''; and
            (3) by indenting paragraph (1) (as designated by 
        subparagraph (A) of this paragraph) and aligning such paragraph 
        with paragraph (2) (as added by subparagraph (B) of this 
        paragraph).
    (b) Utilization of Sand From Outer Continental Shelf.--Section 
8(k)(2)(B) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 
1337(k)(2)(B)) is amended by striking ``an agency of the Federal 
Government'' and inserting ``a Federal, State, or local government 
agency''.
    (c) Report on Nation's Shorelines.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 3 years after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall report to Congress 
        on the state of the Nation's shorelines.
            (2) Contents.--The report shall include--
                    (A) a description of the extent of, and economic 
                and environmental effects caused by, erosion and 
                accretion along the Nation's shores and the causes 
                thereof;
                    (B) a description of resources committed by local, 
                State, and Federal governments to restore and renourish 
                shorelines;
                    (C) a description of the systematic movement of 
                sand along the Nation's shores; and
                    (D) recommendations regarding (i) appropriate 
                levels of Federal and non-Federal participation in 
                shoreline protection, and (ii) utilization of a systems 
                approach to sand management.
            (3) Utilization of specific location data.--In developing 
        the report, the Secretary shall utilize data from specific 
        locations on the Atlantic, Pacific, Great Lakes, and Gulf of 
        Mexico coasts.
    (d) National Coastal Data Bank.--
            (1) Establishment of data bank.--Not later than 2 years 
        after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
        establish a national coastal data bank containing data on the 
        geophysical and climatological characteristics of the Nation's 
        shorelines.
            (2) Content.--To the extent practical, the national coastal 
        data bank shall include data regarding current and predicted 
        shoreline positions, information on federally-authorized shore 
        protection projects, and data on the movement of sand along the 
        Nation's shores, including impediments to such movement caused 
        by natural and manmade features.
            (3) Access.--The national coastal data bank shall be made 
        readily accessible to the public.

SEC. 219. FLOOD PREVENTION COORDINATION.

    Section 206 of the Flood Control Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 709a) is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections 
        (c) and (d), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
    ``(b) Flood Prevention Coordination.--The Secretary shall 
coordinate with the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 
and the heads of other Federal agencies to ensure that flood control 
projects and plans are complementary and integrated to the extent 
practicable and appropriate.''.

SEC. 220. ANNUAL PASSES FOR RECREATION.

    Section 208(c)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(16 U.S.C. 460d note; 110 Stat. 3680) is amended by striking ``1999, or 
the date of transmittal of the report under paragraph (3)'' and 
inserting ``2003''.

SEC. 221. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL AND RECREATIONAL 
              MEASURES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to enter into 
cooperative agreements with non-Federal public bodies and non-profit 
entities for the purpose of facilitating collaborative efforts 
involving environmental protection and restoration, natural resources 
conservation, and recreation in connection with the development, 
operation, and management of water resources projects under the 
jurisdiction of the Department of the Army.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report 
that includes--
            (1) a listing and general description of the cooperative 
        agreements entered into by the Secretary with non-Federal 
        public bodies and entities under subsection (a);
            (2) a determination of whether such agreements are 
        facilitating collaborative efforts; and
            (3) a recommendation on whether such agreements should be 
        further encouraged.

SEC. 222. NONSTRUCTURAL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS.

    (a) Analysis of Benefits.--Section 308 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 2318; 104 Stat. 4638) is amended--
            (1) in the heading to subsection (a) by inserting 
        ``Elements Excluded from'' before ``Benefit-Cost'';
            (2) by redesignating subsections (b) through (e) as 
        subsections (c) through (f), respectively; and
            (3) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
    ``(b) Flood Damage Reduction Benefits.--In calculating the benefits 
of a proposed project for nonstructural flood damage reduction, the 
Secretary shall calculate benefits of nonstructural projects using 
methods similar to structural projects, including similar treatment in 
calculating the benefits from losses avoided from both structural and 
nonstructural alternatives. In carrying out this subsection, the 
Secretary should avoid double counting of benefits.''.
    (b) Reevaluation of Flood Control Projects.--At the request of a 
non-Federal interest for a flood control project, the Secretary shall 
conduct a reevaluation of a previously authorized project to consider 
nonstructural alternatives in light of the amendments made by 
subsection (a).
    (c) Cost Sharing.--Section 103(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(b)) is amended by adding at the 
end the following: ``At any time during construction of the project, 
where the Secretary determines that the costs of lands, easements, 
rights-of-way, dredged material disposal areas, and relocations in 
combination with other costs contributed by the non-Federal interests 
will exceed 35 percent, any additional costs for the project, but not 
to exceed 65 percent of the total costs of the project, shall be a 
Federal responsibility and shall be contributed during construction as 
part of the Federal share.''.

SEC. 223. LAKES PROGRAM.

    Section 602(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (110 
Stat. 3758) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (15);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (16) and 
        inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(17) Clear Lake, Lake County, California, removal of silt 
        and aquatic growth and measures to address excessive 
        sedimentation and high nutrient concentration; and
            ``(18) Osgood Pond, Milford, Hillsborough County, New 
        Hampshire, removal of silt and aquatic growth and measures to 
        address excessive sedimentation.
            ``(19) Flints Pond, Hollis, Hillsborough County, New 
        Hampshire, removal of silt and aquatic growth and measures to 
        address excessive sedimentation.''.

SEC. 224. CONSTRUCTION OF FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS BY NON-FEDERAL 
              INTERESTS.

    (a) Construction by Non-Federal Interests.--Section 211(d)(1) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 701b-13(d)(1)) 
is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(b) or'';
            (2) by striking ``Any non-Federal'' and inserting the 
        following:
                    ``(A) Studies and design activities under 
                subsection (b).--A non-Federal interest may only carry 
                out construction for which studies and design documents 
                are prepared under subsection (b) if the Secretary 
                approves such construction. The Secretary shall approve 
                such construction unless the Secretary determines, in 
                writing, that the design documents do not meet standard 
                practices for design methodologies or that the project 
                is not economically justified or environmentally 
                acceptable or does not meet the requirements for 
                obtaining the appropriate permits required under the 
                Secretary's authority. The Secretary shall not 
                unreasonably withhold approval. Nothing in this 
                subparagraph may be construed to affect any regulatory 
                authority of the Secretary.
                    ``(B) Studies and design activities under 
                subsection (c).--Any non-Federal''; and
            (3) by aligning the remainder of subparagraph (B) (as 
        designated by paragraph (2) of this subsection) with 
        subparagraph (A) (as inserted by paragraph (2) of this 
        subsection).
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 211(d)(2) of such Act is amended 
by inserting ``(other than paragraph (1)(A))'' after ``this 
subsection''.
    (c) Reimbursement.--
            (1) In general.--Section 211(e)(1) of such Act is amended--
                    (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (1) by 
                inserting after ``constructed pursuant to this 
                section'' the following: ``and provide credit for the 
                non-Federal share of the project'';
                    (B) by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph 
                (A);
                    (C) by striking the period at the end of 
                subparagraph (B) and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (D) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) if the construction work is reasonably 
                equivalent to Federal construction work.''.
            (2) Special rules.--Section 211(e)(2)(A) of such Act is 
        amended--
                    (A) by striking ``subject to amounts being made 
                available in advance in appropriations Acts'' and 
                inserting ``subject to appropriations''; and
                    (B) by inserting after ``the cost of such work'' 
                the following: ``, or provide credit (depending on the 
                request of the non-Federal interest) for the non-
                Federal share of such work,''.
            (3) Schedule and manner of reimbursements.--Section 211(e) 
        of such Act (33 U.S.C. 701b-13(e)) is amended by adding at the 
        end the following:
            ``(6) Schedule and manner of reimbursement.--
                    ``(A) Budgeting.--The Secretary shall budget and 
                request appropriations for reimbursements under this 
                section on a schedule that is consistent with a Federal 
                construction schedule.
                    ``(B) Commencement of reimbursements.--
                Reimbursements under this section may commence upon 
                approval of a project by the Secretary.
                    ``(C) Credit.--At the request of a non-Federal 
                interest, the Secretary may reimburse the non-Federal 
                interest by providing credit toward future non-Federal 
                costs of the project.
                    ``(D) Scheduling.--Nothing in this paragraph shall 
                affect the President's discretion to schedule new 
                construction starts.''.

SEC. 225. ENHANCEMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES.

    Section 906(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2283(e)) is amended by inserting after the second sentence the 
following: ``Not more than 80 percent of the non-Federal share of such 
first costs may be satisfied through in-kind contributions, including 
facilities, supplies, and services that are necessary to carry out the 
enhancement project.''.

SEC. 226. SENSE OF CONGRESS; REQUIREMENT REGARDING NOTICE.

    (a) Purchase of American-Made Equipment and Products.--It is the 
sense of Congress that, to the greatest extent practicable, all 
equipment and products purchased with funds made available under this 
Act should be American made.
    (b) Notice to Recipients of Assistance.--In providing financial 
assistance under this Act, the Secretary, to the greatest extent 
practicable, shall provide to each recipient of the assistance a notice 
describing the statement made in subsection (a).

SEC. 227. PERIODIC BEACH NOURISHMENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 506(a) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3757) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(5) Lee county, florida.--Project for shoreline 
        protection, Lee County, Captiva Island segment, Florida.''.
    (b) Projects.--Section 506(b)(3) of such Act (110 Stat. 3758) is 
amended by striking subparagraph (A) and redesignating subparagraphs 
(B) through (D) as subparagraphs (A) through (C), respectively.

SEC. 228. ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING.

    Section 312 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 
Stat. 4639-4640) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(1) by striking ``50'' and inserting 
        ``35''; and
            (2) in subsection (d) by striking ``non-Federal 
        responsibility'' and inserting ``shared as a cost of 
        construction''.

                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

SEC. 301. MISSOURI RIVER LEVEE SYSTEM.

    The project for flood control, Missouri River Levee System, 
authorized by section 10 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the 
construction of certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood 
control, and other purposes'', approved December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 
897), is modified to provide that project costs totaling $2,616,000 
expended on Units L-15, L-246, and L-385 out of the Construction, 
General account of the Corps of Engineers before the date of enactment 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2201 note) 
shall not be treated as part of total project costs.

SEC. 302. OUZINKIE HARBOR, ALASKA.

    (a) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of Federal 
funds that may be expended for the project for navigation, Ouzinkie 
Harbor, Alaska, shall be $8,500,000.
    (b) Revision of Project Cooperation Agreement.--The Secretary shall 
revise the project cooperation agreement for the project referred to in 
subsection (a) to take into account the change in the Federal 
participation in such project pursuant to subsection (a).
    (c) Cost Sharing.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to 
affect any cost-sharing requirement applicable to the project referred 
to in subsection (a) under the Water Resources Development Act of 1986.

SEC. 303. GREERS FERRY LAKE, ARKANSAS.

    The project for flood control, Greers Ferry Lake, Arkansas, 
authorized by the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of 
certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and other 
purposes'', approved June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1218), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to construct water intake facilities for the 
benefit of Lonoke and White Counties, Arkansas.

SEC. 304. TEN- AND FIFTEEN-MILE BAYOUS, ARKANSAS.

    The project for flood control, St. Francis River Basin, Missouri 
and Arkansas, authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 
1950 (64 Stat. 172), is modified to expand the project boundaries to 
include Ten- and Fifteen-Mile Bayous near West Memphis, Arkansas. 
Notwithstanding section 103(f) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (100 Stat. 4086), the flood control work at Ten- and Fifteen-
Mile Bayous shall not be considered separable elements of the St. 
Francis Basin project.

SEC. 305. LOGGY BAYOU, RED RIVER BELOW DENISON DAM, ARKANSAS, 
              LOUISIANA, OKLAHOMA, AND TEXAS.

    The project for flood control on the Red River Below Denison Dam, 
Arkansas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, and Texas, authorized by section 10 of 
the Flood Control Act of 1946 (60 Stat. 647), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to conduct a study to determine the feasibility of expanding 
the project to include mile 0.0 to mile 7.8 of Loggy Bayou between the 
Red River and Flat River. If the Secretary determines as a result of 
the study that the project should be expanded, the Secretary may assume 
responsibility for operation and maintenance of the expanded project.

SEC. 306. SACRAMENTO RIVER, GLENN-COLUSA, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Sacramento River, 
California, authorized by section 2 of the Act entitled ``An Act to 
provide for the control of the floods of the Mississippi River and of 
the Sacramento River, California, and for other purposes'', approved 
March 1, 1917 (39 Stat. 949), and modified by section 102 of the Energy 
and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1990 (103 Stat. 649), section 
301(b)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
3110), and title I of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations 
Act, 1999 (112 Stat. 1841), is further modified to authorize the 
Secretary--
            (1) to carry out the portion of the project at Glenn-
        Colusa, California, at a total cost of $26,000,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $20,000,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $6,000,000; and
            (2) to carry out bank stabilization work in the vicinity of 
        the riverbed gradient facility, particularly in the vicinity of 
        River Mile 208.
    (b) Credit.--The Secretary shall provide the non-Federal interests 
for the project referred to in subsection (a) a credit of up to 
$4,000,000 toward the non-Federal share of the project costs for the 
direct and indirect costs incurred by the non-Federal sponsor in 
carrying out activities associated with environmental compliance for 
the project. Such credit may be in the form of reimbursements for costs 
which were incurred by the non-Federal interests prior to an agreement 
with the Corps of Engineers, to include the value of lands, easements, 
rights-of-way, relocations, or dredged material disposal areas.

SEC. 307. SAN LORENZO RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood control and habitat restoration, San Lorenzo 
River, California, authorized by section 101(a)(5) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3663), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to expand the boundaries of the project to 
include bank stabilization for a 1,000-foot portion of the San Lorenzo 
River.

SEC. 308. TERMINUS DAM, KAWEAH RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Transfer of Title to Additional Land.--If the non-Federal 
interests for the project for flood control and water supply, Terminus 
Dam, Kaweah River, California, authorized by section 101(b)(5) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3667), transfers to 
the Secretary without consideration title to perimeter lands acquired 
for the project by the non-Federal interests, the Secretary may accept 
the transfer of such title.
    (b) Lands, Easement, and Rights-of-Way.--Nothing in this section 
shall be construed to change, modify, or otherwise affect the 
responsibility of the non-Federal interests to provide lands, 
easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and dredged material disposal 
areas necessary for the Terminus Dam project and to perform operation 
and maintenance for the project.
    (c) Operation and Maintenance.--Upon request by the non-Federal 
interests, the Secretary shall carry out operation, maintenance, 
repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of the project if the non-
Federal interests enter into a binding agreement with the Secretary to 
reimburse the Secretary for 100 percent of the costs of such operation, 
maintenance, repair, replacement, and rehabilitation.
    (d) Hold Harmless.--The non-Federal interests shall hold the United 
States harmless for ownership, operation, and maintenance of lands and 
facilities of the Terminus Dam project title to which is transferred to 
the Secretary under this section.

SEC. 309. DELAWARE RIVER MAINSTEM AND CHANNEL DEEPENING, DELAWARE, NEW 
              JERSEY, AND PENNSYLVANIA.

    The project for navigation, Delaware River Mainstem and Channel 
Deepening, Delaware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania, authorized by section 
101(6) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4802), 
is modified as follows:
            (1) The Secretary is authorized to provide non-Federal 
        interests credit toward cash contributions required for 
        construction and subsequent to construction for engineering and 
        design and construction management work that is performed by 
        non-Federal interests and that the Secretary determines is 
        necessary to implement the project. Any such credits extended 
        shall reduce the Philadelphia District's private sector 
        performance goals for engineering work by a like amount.
            (2) The Secretary is authorized to provide to non-Federal 
        interests credit toward cash contributions required during 
        construction and subsequent to construction for the costs of 
        construction carried out by the non-Federal interest on behalf 
        of the Secretary and that the Secretary determines is necessary 
        to implement the project.
            (3) The Secretary is authorized to enter into an agreement 
        with a non-Federal interest for the payment of disposal or 
        tipping fees for dredged material from a Federal project other 
        than for the construction or operation and maintenance of the 
        new deepening project as described in the Limited Reevaluation 
        Report of May 1997, where the non-Federal interest has supplied 
        the corresponding disposal capacity.
            (4) The Secretary is authorized to enter into an agreement 
        with a non-Federal interest that will provide that the non-
        Federal interest may carry out or cause to have carried out, on 
        behalf of the Secretary, a disposal area management program for 
        dredged material disposal areas necessary to construct, 
        operate, and maintain the project and to authorize the 
        Secretary to reimburse the non-Federal interest for the costs 
        of the disposal area management program activities carried out 
        by the non-Federal interest.

SEC. 310. POTOMAC RIVER, WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

    The project for flood control authorized by section 5 of the Flood 
Control Act of June 22, 1936 (69 Stat. 1574), as modified by section 
301(a)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
3707), is further modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the 
project at a Federal cost of $5,965,000.

SEC. 311. BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the non-Federal 
interest, shall conduct a study of any damage to the project for 
shoreline protection, Brevard County, Florida, authorized by section 
101(b)(7) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
3667), to determine whether the damage is the result of a Federal 
navigation project.
    (b) Conditions.--In conducting the study, the Secretary shall 
utilize the services of an independent coastal expert who shall 
consider all relevant studies completed by the Corps of Engineers and 
the project's local sponsor. The study shall be completed within 120 
days of the date of enactment of this Act.
    (c) Mitigation of Damages.--After completion of the study, the 
Secretary shall mitigate any damage to the shoreline protection project 
that is the result of a Federal navigation project. The costs of the 
mitigation shall be allocated to the Federal navigation project as 
operation and maintenance.

SEC. 312. BROWARD COUNTY AND HILLSBORO INLET, FLORIDA.

    The project for shoreline protection, Broward County and Hillsboro 
Inlet, Florida, authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1965 (79 Stat. 1090), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
reimburse the non-Federal interest for the Federal share of the cost of 
preconstruction planning and design for the project upon execution of a 
contract to construct the project if the Secretary determines such work 
is compatible with and integral to the project.

SEC. 313. FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA.

    (a) In General.--The project for shore protection and harbor 
mitigation, Fort Pierce, Florida, authorized by section 301 of the 
River and Harbor Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1092) and section 506(a)(2) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3757), is 
modified to incorporate an additional 1 mile into the project in 
accordance with a final approved General Reevaluation Report, at a 
total cost for initial nourishment for the entire project of 
$9,128,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $7,073,500 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $2,054,500.
    (b) Period Nourishment.--Periodic nourishment is authorized for the 
project in accordance with section 506(a)(2) of Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3757).
    (c) Revision of the Project Cooperation Agreement.--The Secretary 
shall revise the project cooperation agreement for the project referred 
to in subsection (a) to take into account the change in Federal 
participation in the project pursuant to subsection (a).

SEC. 314. NASSAU COUNTY, FLORIDA.

    The project for beach erosion control, Nassau County (Amelia 
fIsland), Florida, authorized by section 3(a)(3) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4013), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to construct the project at a total cost of $17,000,000, with 
an estimated Federal cost of $13,300,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $3,700,000.

SEC. 315. MIAMI HARBOR CHANNEL, FLORIDA.

    The project for navigation, Miami Harbor Channel, Florida, 
authorized by section 101(a)(9) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1990 (104 Stat. 4606), is modified to include construction of 
artificial reefs and related environmental mitigation required by 
Federal, State, and local environmental permitting agencies for the 
project.

SEC. 316. LAKE MICHIGAN, ILLINOIS.

    The project for storm damage reduction and shoreline erosion 
protection, Lake Michigan, Illinois, from Wilmette, Illinois, to the 
Illinois-Indiana State line, authorized by section 101(a)(12) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3664), is modified 
to authorize the Secretary to provide a credit against the non-Federal 
share of the cost of the project for costs incurred by the non-Federal 
interest--
            (1) in constructing Reach 2D and Segment 8 of Reach 4 of 
        the project; and
            (2) in reconstructing Solidarity Drive in Chicago, 
        Illinois, prior to entry into a project cooperation agreement 
        with the Secretary.

SEC. 317. SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS.

    Section 417 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3743) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a) In General.--'' before ``The 
        Secretary''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of assistance provided 
under this section before, on, or after the date of enactment of this 
subsection shall be 50 percent.''.

SEC. 318. LITTLE CALUMET RIVER, INDIANA.

    The project for flood control, Little Calumet River, Indiana, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4115), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
construct the project substantially in accordance with the report of 
the Corps of Engineers, at a total cost of $167,000,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $122,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
cost of $45,000,000.

SEC. 319. OGDEN DUNES, INDIANA.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of beach erosion in 
and around the town of Ogden Dunes, Indiana, to determine whether the 
damage is the result of a Federal navigation project.
    (b) Mitigation of Damages.--After completion of the study, the 
Secretary shall mitigate any damage to the beach and shoreline that is 
the result of a Federal navigation project. The cost of the mitigation 
shall be allocated to the Federal navigation project as operation and 
maintenance.

SEC. 320. SAINT JOSEPH RIVER, SOUTH BEND, INDIANA.

    (a) Maximum Total Expenditure.--The maximum total expenditure for 
the project for streambank erosion, recreation, and pedestrian access 
features, Saint Joseph River, South Bend, Indiana, shall be $7,800,000.
    (b) Revision of Project Cooperation Agreement.--The Secretary shall 
revise the project cooperation agreement for the project referred to in 
subsection (a) to take into account the change in the Federal 
participation in such project pursuant to subsection (a).
    (c) Cost Sharing.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to 
affect any cost-sharing requirement applicable to the project referred 
to in subsection (a) under title I of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211 et seq.).

SEC. 321. WHITE RIVER, INDIANA.

    The project for flood control, Indianapolis on West Fork of the 
White River, Indiana, authorized by section 5 of the Act entitled ``An 
Act authorizing the construction of certain public works on rivers and 
harbors for flood control, and other purposes'', approved June 22, 1936 
(49 Stat. 1586), and modified by section 323 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3716), is further modified to 
authorize the Secretary to undertake riverfront alterations as 
described in the Central Indianapolis Waterfront Concept Master Plan, 
dated February 1994, at a total cost of $110,975,000, with an estimated 
Federal cost of $52,475,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
$58,500,000.

SEC. 322. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN, LOUISIANA.

    The project for hurricane-flood protection, Lake Pontchartrain, 
Louisiana, authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 
(79 Stat. 1077), is modified--
            (1) to direct the Secretary to conduct a study to determine 
        the feasibility of constructing a pump adjacent to each of the 
        4 proposed drainage structures for the Saint Charles Parish 
        feature of the project; and
            (2) to authorize the Secretary to construct such pumps upon 
        completion of the study.

SEC. 323. LAROSE TO GOLDEN MEADOW, LOUISIANA.

    The project for hurricane protection Larose to Golden Meadow, 
Louisiana, authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 
(79 Stat. 1077), is modified to direct the Secretary to convert the 
Golden Meadow floodgate into a navigation lock if the Secretary 
determines that the conversion is feasible.

SEC. 324. LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY LEVEE, LOUISIANA.

    The Louisiana State Penitentiary Levee project, Louisiana, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4117), is modified to direct the Secretary to provide 
credit to the non-Federal interest toward the non-Federal share of the 
cost of the project. The credit shall be for cost of work performed by 
the non-Federal interest prior to the execution of a project 
cooperation agreement as determined by the Secretary to be compatible 
with and an integral part of the project.

SEC. 325. TWELVE-MILE BAYOU, CADDO PARISH, LOUISIANA.

    The Secretary shall be responsible for maintenance of the levee 
along Twelve-Mile Bayou from its junction with the existing Red River 
Below Denison Dam Levee approximately 26 miles upstream to its terminus 
at high ground in the vicinity of Black Bayou, Caddo Parish, Louisiana, 
if the Secretary determines that such maintenance is economically 
justified and environmentally acceptable and that the levee was 
constructed in accordance with appropriate design and engineering 
standards.

SEC. 326. WEST BANK OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER (EAST OF HARVEY CANAL), 
              LOUISIANA.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control and storm damage 
reduction, West Bank of the Mississippi River (East of Harvey Canal), 
Louisiana, authorized by section 401(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4128) and section 101(a)(17) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3665), is modified--
            (1) to provide that any liability under the Comprehensive 
        Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 
        (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.) from the construction of the project 
        is a Federal responsibility; and
            (2) to authorize the Secretary to carry out operation and 
        maintenance of that portion of the project included in the 
        report of the Chief of Engineers, dated May 1, 1995, referred 
        to as ``Algiers Channel'', if the non-Federal sponsor 
        reimburses the Secretary for the amount of such operation and 
        maintenance included in the report of the Chief of Engineers.
    (b) Combination of Projects.--The Secretary shall carry out work 
authorized as part of the Westwego to Harvey Canal project, the East of 
Harvey cannal project, and the Lake Cataouatche modifications as a 
single project, to be known as the West Bank and vicinity, New Orleans, 
Louisiana, hurricane protection project, with a combined total cost of 
$280,300,000.

SEC. 327. TOLCHESTER CHANNEL, BALTIMORE HARBOR AND CHANNELS, CHESAPEAKE 
              BAY, KENT COUNTY, MARYLAND.

    The project for navigation, Tolchester Channel, Baltimore Harbor 
and Channels, Chesapeake Bay, Kent County, Maryland, authorized by 
section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 297), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to straighten the navigation 
channel in accordance with the District Engineer's Navigation 
Assessment Report and Environmental Assessment, dated April 30, 1997. 
This modification shall be carried out in order to improve navigation 
safety.

SEC. 328. SAULT SAINTE MARIE, CHIPPEWA COUNTY, MICHIGAN.

    The project for navigation Sault Sainte Marie, Chippewa County, 
Michigan, authorized by section 1149 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4254-4255) and modified by section 330 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3717-3718), is 
further modified to provide that the amount to be paid by non-Federal 
interests pursuant to section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211(a)) and subsection (a) of such section 330 
shall not include any interest payments.

SEC. 329. JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI.

    The project for environmental infrastructure, Jackson County, 
Mississippi, authorized by section 219(c)(5) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835) and modified by section 504 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3757), is 
further modified to direct the Secretary to provide a credit, not to 
exceed $5,000,000, against the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project for the costs incurred by the Jackson County Board of 
Supervisors since February 8, 1994, in constructing the project if the 
Secretary determines that such costs are for work that the Secretary 
determines is compatible with and integral to the project.

 SEC. 330. TUNICA LAKE, MISSISSIPPI.

    The project for flood control, Mississippi River Channel 
Improvement Project, Tunica Lake, Mississippi, authorized by the Act 
entitled: ``An Act for the control of floods on the Mississippi River 
and its tributaries, and for other purposes'', approved May 15, 1928 
(45 Stat. 534-538), is modified to include construction of a weir at 
the Tunica Cutoff, Mississippi.

SEC. 331. BOIS BRULE DRAINAGE AND LEVEE DISTRICT, MISSOURI.

    (a) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of Federal 
funds that may be allocated for the project for flood control, Bois 
Brule Drainage and Levee District, Missouri, authorized pursuant to 
section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), shall be 
$8,000,000.
    (b) Revision of the Project Cooperation Agreement.--The Secretary 
shall revise the project cooperation agreement for the project referred 
to in subsection (a) to take into account the change in Federal 
participation in the project pursuant to subsection (a).
    (c) Cost Sharing.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to 
affect any cost-sharing requirement applicable to the project referred 
to in subsection (a) under title I of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211 et seq.).

SEC. 332. MERAMEC RIVER BASIN, VALLEY PARK LEVEE, MISSOURI.

    The project for flood control, Meramec River Basin, Valley Park 
Levee, Missouri, authorized by section 2(h) of an Act entitled ``An Act 
to deauthorize several projects within the jurisdiction of the Army 
Corps of Engineers'' (95 Stat. 1682-1683) and modified by section 1128 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986, (100 Stat. 4246), is 
further modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project at 
a maximum Federal expenditure of $35,000,000.

SEC. 333. MISSOURI RIVER MITIGATION PROJECT, MISSOURI, KANSAS, IOWA, 
              AND NEBRASKA.

    (a) In General.--The project for mitigation of fish and wildlife 
losses, Missouri River Bank Stabilization and Navigation Project, 
Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, and Nebraska, authorized by section 601 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4143), is modified 
to increase by 118,650 acres the lands and interests in lands to be 
acquired for the project.
    (b) Study.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in conjunction with the 
        States of Nebraska, Iowa, Kansas, and Missouri, shall conduct a 
        study to determine the cost of restoring, under the authority 
        of the Missouri River fish and wildlife mitigation project, a 
        total of 118,650 acres of lost Missouri River habitat.
            (2) Report.--The Secretary shall report to Congress on the 
        results of the study not later than 6 months after the date of 
        enactment of this Act.

SEC. 334. WOOD RIVER, GRAND ISLAND, NEBRASKA.

    The project for flood control, Wood River, Grand Island, Nebraska, 
authorized by section 101(a)(19) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3665), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
construct the project substantially in accordance with the report of 
the Corps of Engineers dated June 29, 1998, at a total cost of 
$17,039,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $9,730,000 and an 
estimated non-Federal cost of $7,309,000.

SEC. 335. ABSECON ISLAND, NEW JERSEY.

    The project for storm damage reduction and shoreline protection, 
Brigantine Inlet to Great Egg Harbor Inlet, Absecon Island, New Jersey, 
authorized by section 101(b)(13) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3668), is modified to provide that, if, after 
October 12, 1996, the non-Federal interests carry out any work 
associated with the project that is later recommended by the Chief of 
Engineers and approved by the Secretary, the Secretary may credit the 
non-Federal interests toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project an amount equal to the Federal share of the cost of such work, 
without interest.

SEC. 336. NEW YORK HARBOR AND ADJACENT CHANNELS, PORT JERSEY, NEW 
              JERSEY

    The project for navigation, New York Harbor and Adjacent Channels, 
New York and New Jersey, authorized by section 202(b) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4098), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to construct that portion of the project that 
is located between Military Ocean Terminal Bayonne and Global Terminal 
in Bayonne, New Jersey, substantially in accordance with the report of 
the Corps of Engineers, at a total cost of $103,267,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $76,909,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $26,358,000.

SEC. 337. PASSAIC RIVER, NEW JERSEY.

    Section 101(a)(18)(B) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1990 (104 Stat. 4608-4609) is amended by inserting ``, including an 
esplanade for safe pedestrian access with an overall width of 600 
feet'' after ``public access to Route 21''.

SEC. 338. SANDY HOOK TO BARNEGAT INLET, NEW JERSEY.

    The project for shoreline protection, Sandy Hook to Barnegat Inlet, 
New Jersey, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 
1958 (72 Stat. 299), is modified--
            (1) to include the demolition of Long Branch pier and 
        extension of Ocean Grove pier; and
            (2) to authorize the Secretary to reimburse the non-Federal 
        sponsor for the Federal share of costs associated with the 
        demolition of Long Branch pier and the construction of the 
        Ocean Grove pier.

SEC. 339. ARTHUR KILL, NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY.

    The project for navigation, Arthur Kill, New York and New Jersey, 
authorized by section 202(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4098) and modified by section 301(b)(11) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3711), is further modified 
to authorize the Secretary to construct the portion of the project at 
Howland Hook Marine Terminal substantially in accordance with the 
report of the Corps of Engineers, dated September 30, 1998, at a total 
cost of $315,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $183,200,000 
and an estimated non-Federal cost of $132,500,000.

SEC. 340. NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED.

    Section 552(i) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3781) is amended by striking ``$22,500,000'' and inserting 
``$42,500,000''.

SEC. 341. NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM.

    Section 553(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3781) is amended by striking ``$8,000,000'' and inserting 
``$18,000,000''.

SEC. 342. FIRE ISLAND INLET TO MONTAUK POINT, NEW YORK.

    The project for combined beach erosion control and hurricane 
protection, Fire Island Inlet to Montauk Point, Long Island, New York, 
authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (74 Stat. 483) and 
modified by the River and Harbor Act of 1962, the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1974, and the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986, is further modified to direct the Secretary, in coordination with 
the heads of other Federal departments and agencies, to complete all 
procedures and reviews expeditiously and to adopt and transmit to 
Congress not later than June 30, 1999, a mutually acceptable shore 
erosion plan for the Fire Island Inlet to Moriches Inlet reach of the 
project.

SEC. 343. BROKEN BOW LAKE, RED RIVER BASIN, OKLAHOMA.

    The project for flood control and water supply, Broken Bow Lake, 
Red River Basin, Oklahoma, authorized by section 203 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 309) and modified by section 203 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1187), section 102(v) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4808), and section 338 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3720), is 
further modified to require the Secretary to make seasonal adjustments 
to the top of the conservation pool at the project as follows (if the 
Secretary determines that the adjustments will be undertaken at no cost 
to the United States and will adequately protect impacted water and 
related resources):
            (1) Maintain an elevation of 599.5 from November 1 through 
        March 31.
            (2) Increase elevation gradually from 599.5 to 602.5 during 
        April and May.
            (3) Maintain an elevation of 602.5 from June 1 to September 
        30.
            (4) Decrease elevation gradually from 602.5 to 599.5 during 
        October.

SEC. 344. WILLAMETTE RIVER TEMPERATURE CONTROL, MCKENZIE SUBBASIN, 
              OREGON.

    (a) In General.--The project for environmental restoration, 
Willamette River Temperature Control, McKenzie Subbasin, Oregon, 
authorized by section 101(a)(25) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1996 (110 Stat. 3665), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
construct the project substantially in accordance with the Feature 
Memorandum dated July 31, 1998, at a total cost of $64,741,000.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall report to Congress on the reasons for the 
cost growth of the Willamette River project and outline the steps the 
Corps of Engineers is taking to control project costs, including the 
application of value engineering and other appropriate measures. In the 
report, the Secretary shall also include a cost estimate for, and 
recommendations on the advisability of, adding fish screens to the 
project.

SEC. 345. AYLESWORTH CREEK RESERVOIR, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The project for flood control, Aylesworth Creek Reservoir, 
Pennsylvania, authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 
1962 (76 Stat. 1182), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
transfer, in each of fiscal years 1999 and 2000, $50,000 to the 
Aylesworth Creek Reservoir Park Authority for recreational facilities.

SEC. 346. CURWENSVILLE LAKE, PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 562 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3784) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``The 
Secretary shall provide design and construction assistance for 
recreational facilities at Curwensville Lake and, when appropriate, may 
require the non-Federal interest to provide not more than 25 percent of 
the cost of designing and constructing such facilities. The Secretary 
may transfer, in each of fiscal years 1999 through 2003, $100,000 to 
the Clearfield County Municipal Services and Recreation Authority for 
recreational facilities.''.

SEC. 347. DELAWARE RIVER, PENNSYLVANIA AND DELAWARE.

    The project for navigation, Delaware River, Philadelphia to 
Wilmington, Pennsylvania and Delaware, authorized by section 3(a)(12) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4014), is 
modified to authorize the Secretary to extend the channel of the 
Delaware River at Camden, New Jersey, to within 150 feet of the 
existing bulkhead and to relocate the 40-foot deep Federal navigation 
channel, eastward within Philadelphia Harbor, from the Ben Franklin 
Bridge to the Walt Whitman Bridge, into deep water.

SEC. 348. MUSSERS DAM, PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 209 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4830) is amended by striking subsection (e) and redesignating 
subsection (f) as subsection (e).

SEC. 349. NINE-MILE RUN, ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Nine-Mile Run project, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, carried 
out pursuant to section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330; 110 Stat. 3679-3680), is modified to authorize 
the Secretary to provide a credit toward the non-Federal share of the 
project for costs incurred by the non-Federal interest in preparing 
environmental and feasibility documentation for the project before 
entering into an agreement with the Corps of Engineers with respect to 
the project if the Secretary determines such costs are for work that is 
compatible with and integral to the project.

SEC. 350. RAYSTOWN LAKE, PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) Recreation Partnership Initiative.--Section 519(b) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3765) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following:
            ``(3) Engineering and design services.--The Secretary may 
        perform, at full Federal expense, engineering and design 
        services for project infrastructure expected to be associated 
        with the development of the site at Raystown Lake, Hesston, 
        Pennsylvania.''.
    (b) Construction Assistance.--
            (1) In general.--Consistent with the master plan described 
        in section 318 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
        (106 Stat. 4848), the Secretary may provide a grant to Juniata 
        College for the construction of facilities and structures at 
        Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania, to interpret and understand 
        environmental conditions and trends. As a condition of the 
        receipt of such financial assistance, officials at Juniata 
        College shall coordinate with the Baltimore District of the 
        Army Corps of Engineers.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated $5,000,000 for fiscal years beginning after 
        September 30, 1998, to carry out this subsection.

SEC. 351. SOUTH CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 313(g)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 
(106 Stat. 4846) is amended by striking ``$80,000,000'' and inserting 
``$180,000,000''.

SEC. 352. COOPER RIVER, CHARLESTON HARBOR, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    The project for rediversion, Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, South 
Carolina, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 
(82 Stat. 731) and modified by title I of the Energy and Water 
Development Appropriations Act, 1992 (105 Stat. 516), is further 
modified to authorize the Secretary to pay to the State of South 
Carolina not more than $3,750,000 if the Secretary and the State enter 
into a binding agreement for the State to perform all future operation 
of, including associated studies to assess the efficacy of, the St. 
Stephen, South Carolina, fish lift. The agreement must specify the 
terms and conditions under which payment will be made and the rights 
of, and remedies available to, the Federal Government to recover all or 
a portion of such payment in the event the State suspends or terminates 
operation of the fish lift or fails to operate the fish lift in a 
manner satisfactory to the Secretary. Maintenance of the fish lift 
shall remain a Federal responsibility.

SEC. 353. BOWIE COUNTY LEVEE, TEXAS.

    The project for flood control, Red River Below Denison Dam, Texas 
and Oklahoma, authorized by section 10 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 
(60 Stat. 647), is modified to direct the Secretary to implement the 
Bowie County Levee feature of the project in accordance with the plan 
defined as Alternative B in the draft document entitled ``Bowie County 
Local Flood Protection, Red River, Texas Project Design Memorandum No. 
1, Bowie County Levee'', dated April 1997. In evaluating and 
implementing this modification, the Secretary shall allow the non-
Federal interest to participate in the financing of the project in 
accordance with section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to the extent that the Secretary's evaluation 
indicates that applying such section is necessary to implement the 
project.

SEC. 354. CLEAR CREEK, TEXAS.

    Section 575 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3789) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Clear Creek, Texas.--In any evaluation of economic benefits 
and costs for the project for flood control, Clear Creek, Texas, 
authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 
742) that occurs after the date of enactment of this subsection, the 
Secretary shall include the costs and benefits of nonstructural 
measures undertaken, including any buyout or relocation actions, of 
non-Federal interests within the drainage area of such project before 
the date of the evaluation in the determination of conditions existing 
before the construction of the project.''.

SEC. 355. CYPRESS CREEK, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Cypress Creek, 
Texas, authorized by section 3(a)(13) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4014), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to carry out a nonstructural flood control project at a total 
cost of $5,000,000.
    (b) Reimbursement for Work.--The Secretary may reimburse the non-
Federal interest for the Cypress Creek project for work done by the 
non-Federal interest on the nonstructural flood control project in an 
amount equal to the estimate of the Federal share, without interest, of 
the cost of such work--
            (1) if, after authorization and before initiation of 
        construction of such nonstructural project, the Secretary 
        approves the plans for construction of such nonstructural 
        project by the non-Federal interest; and
            (2) if the Secretary finds, after a review of studies and 
        design documents prepared to carry out such nonstructural 
        project, that construction of such nonstructural project is 
        economically justified and environmentally acceptable.

SEC. 356. DALLAS FLOODWAY EXTENSION, DALLAS, TEXAS.

    The project for flood control, Dallas Floodway Extension, Dallas, 
Texas, authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 
(79 Stat. 1091) and modified by section 351 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3724), is further modified--
            (1) to add environmental restoration and recreation as 
        project purposes; and
            (2) to authorize the Secretary to construct the project 
        substantially in accordance with the Chain of Wetlands Plan in 
        the report of the Corps of Engineers at a total cost of 
        $123,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $80,000,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $43,200,000.

SEC. 357. UPPER JORDAN RIVER, UTAH.

    The project for flood control, Upper Jordan River, Utah, authorized 
by section 101(a)(23) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
(104 Stat. 4610) and modified by section 301(a)(14) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3709), is further modified 
to direct the Secretary to carry out the locally preferred project, 
entitled ``Upper Jordan River Flood Control Project, Salt Lake County, 
Utah--Supplemental Information'' and identified in the document of Salt 
Lake County, Utah, dated July 30, 1998, at a total cost of $12,870,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $8,580,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $4,290,000.

SEC. 358. ELIZABETH RIVER, CHESAPEAKE, VIRGINIA.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the city of Chesapeake, Virginia, shall not be 
obligated to make the annual cash contribution required under paragraph 
1(9) of the Local Cooperation Agreement dated December 12, 1978, 
between the Government and the city for the project for navigation, 
southern branch of Elizabeth River, Chesapeake, Virginia.

SEC. 359. BLUESTONE LAKE, OHIO RIVER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 102(ff) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4810) is amended by striking ``take such measures as are 
technologically feasible'' and inserting ``implement Plan C/G, as 
defined in the Evaluation Report of the District Engineer, dated 
December 1996,''.

SEC. 360. GREENBRIER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 579(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3790) is amended by striking ``$12,000,000'' and inserting 
``$73,000,000.''

SEC. 361. MOOREFIELD, WEST VIRGINIA.

    The project for flood control, Moorefield, West Virginia, 
authorized by section 101(a)(25) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1990 (104 Stat. 4610-4611), is modified to provide that the non-
Federal interest shall not be required to pay the unpaid balance, 
including interest, of the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project.

SEC. 362. WEST VIRGINIA AND PENNSYLVANIA FLOOD CONTROL.

    Section 581(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3790) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(a) In General.--The Secretary may design and construct--
            ``(1) flood control measures in the Cheat and Tygart River 
        basins, West Virginia, at a level of protection that is 
        sufficient to prevent any future losses to these communities 
        from flooding such as occurred in January 1996 but no less than 
        a 100-year level of protection; and
            ``(2) structural and nonstructural flood control, 
        streambank protection, stormwater management, and channel 
        clearing and modification measures in the Lower Allegheny, 
        Lower Monongahela, West Branch Susquehanna, and Juniata River 
        basins, Pennsylvania, at a level of protection that is 
        sufficient to prevent any future losses to communities in these 
        basins from flooding such as occurred in January 1996, but no 
        less than a 100-year level of flood protection with respect to 
        those measures that incorporate levees or floodwalls.''.

SEC. 363. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) Lee Creek, Arkansas and Oklahoma.--The project for flood 
protection on Lee Creek, Arkansas and Oklahoma, authorized by section 
204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1078) and deauthorized 
pursuant to section 1001(b)(1) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(1)), is authorized to be carried out by the 
Secretary.
    (b) Indian River County, Florida.--The project for shore 
protection, Indian River County, Florida, authorized by section 501 of 
the Water Resources and Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4134) and 
deauthorized pursuant to section 1001(b)(1) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(1)), is authorized to be 
carried out by the Secretary.
    (c) Lido Key, Florida.--The project for shore protection, Lido Key, 
Florida, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1970 
(84 Stat. 1819) and deauthorized pursuant to section 1001(b)(2) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C 579a(b)(2)), is 
authorized to be carried out by the Secretary.
    (d) St. Augustine, St. Johns County, Florida.--
            (1) In general.--The project for shore protection and storm 
        damage reduction, St. Augustine, St. Johns County, Florida, 
        authorized by section 501 of the Water Resources Development 
        Act of 1986 and deauthorized pursuant to section 1001(a) of 
        such Act (33 U.S.C. 579a(a)), is authorized to include 
        navigation mitigation as a project purpose and to be carried 
        out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with the 
        General Reevaluation Report dated November 18, 1998, at a total 
        cost of $16,086,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $12,949,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,137,000.
            (2) Periodic nourishment.--The Secretary is authorized to 
        carry out periodic nourishment for the project for a 50-year 
        period at an estimated average annual cost of $1,251,000, with 
        an estimated annual Federal cost of $1,007,000 and an estimated 
        annual non-Federal cost of $244,000.
    (e) Saginaw River, Michigan (Vassar).--The project for flood 
protection, Saginaw River, Michigan (Vassar), authorized by section 203 
of the Flood Control Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 311) and deauthorized 
pursuant to section 1001(b)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)), is authorized to be carried out by the 
Secretary.
    (f) Saginaw River, Michigan (Shiawassee Flats).--The project for 
flood control, Saginaw River, Michigan (Shiawassee Flats), authorized 
by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 311) and 
deauthorized pursuant to section 1001(b)(2) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)), is authorized to be 
carried out by the Secretary.
    (g) Park River, Grafton, North Dakota.--The project for flood 
control, Park River, Grafton, North Dakota, authorized by section 
401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4121) 
and deauthorized pursuant to section 1001(a) of such Act (33 U.S.C. 
579a(a)), is authorized to be carried out by the Secretary.
    (h) Memphis Harbor, Memphis, Tennessee.--The project for 
navigation, Memphis Harbor, Memphis, Tennessee, authorized by section 
601(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4145) 
and deauthorized pursuant to 1001(a) of such Act (33 U.S.C 579a(a)), is 
authorized to be carried out by the Secretary.

SEC. 364. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The following projects or portions of projects are 
not authorized after the date of enactment of this Act:
            (1) Bridgeport harbor, connecticut.--That portion of the 
        project for navigation, Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut, 
        authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 
        (72 Stat. 297), consisting of a 2.4-acre anchorage area, 9 feet 
        deep, and an adjacent 0.6-acre anchorage, 6 feet deep, located 
        on the west side of Johnsons River.
            (2) Clinton harbor, connecticut.--That portion of the 
        project for navigation, Clinton Harbor, Connecticut, authorized 
        by the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1945, House Document 240, 76th 
        Congress, 1st Session, lying upstream of a line designated by 
        the 2 points N158,592.12, E660,193.92 and N158,444.58, 
        E660,220.95.
            (3) Bass harbor, maine.--The following portions of the 
        project for navigation, Bass Harbor, Maine, authorized on May 
        7, 1962, under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 
        (33 U.S.C. 577):
                    (A) Beginning at a bend in the project, N149040.00, 
                E538505.00, thence running easterly about 50.00 feet 
                along the northern limit of the project to a point 
                N149061.55, E538550.11, thence running southerly about 
                642.08 feet to a point, N14877.64, E538817.18, thence 
                running southwesterly about 156.27 feet to a point on 
                the westerly limit of the project, N148348.50, 
                E538737.02, thence running northerly about 149.00 feet 
                along the westerly limit of the project to a bend in 
                the project, N148489.22, E538768.09, thence running 
                northwesterly about 610.39 feet along the westerly 
                limit of the project to the point of origin.
                    (B) Beginning at a point on the westerly limit of 
                the project, N148118.55, E538689.05, thence running 
                southeasterly about 91.92 feet to a point, N148041.43, 
                E538739.07, thence running southerly about 65.00 feet 
                to a point, N147977.86, E538725.51, thence running 
                southwesterly about 91.92 feet to a point on the 
                westerly limit of the project, N147927.84, E538648.39, 
                thence running northerly about 195.00 feet along the 
                westerly limit of the project to the point of origin.
            (4) Boothbay harbor, maine.--The project for navigation, 
        Boothbay Harbor, Maine, authorized by the River and Harbor Act 
        of 1912 (37 Stat. 201).
            (5) Bucksport harbor, maine.--That portion of the project 
        for navigation, Bucksport Harbor, Maine, authorized by the 
        River and Harbor Act of 1902, consisting of a 16-foot deep 
        channel beginning at a point N268.748.16, E423.390.76, thence 
        running north 47 degrees 02 minutes 23 seconds east 51.76 feet 
        to a point N268.783.44, E423.428.64, thence running north 67 
        degrees 54 minutes 32 seconds west 1513.94 feet to a point 
        N269.352.81, E422.025.84, thence running south 47 degrees 02 
        minutes 23 seconds west 126.15 feet to a point N269.266.84, 
        E421.933.52, thence running south 70 degrees 24 minutes 28 
        seconds east 1546.79 feet to the point of origin.
            (6) East boothbay harbor, maine.--The project for 
        navigation, East Boothbay Harbor, Maine, authorized by the 
        first section of the Act entitled, ``An Act making 
        appropriations for the construction, repair, and preservation 
        of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other 
        purposes'', approved June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 631).
            (7) Green harbor, massachusetts.--That portion of the 
        project for navigation, Green Harbor, Massachusetts, undertaken 
        pursuant to section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 
        U.S.C. 577), consisting of the 6-foot deep channel beginning at 
        a point along the west limit of the existing project, North 
        395990.43, East 831079.16, thence running northwesterly about 
        752.85 feet to a point, North 396722.80, East 830904.76, thence 
        running northwesterly about 222.79 feet to a point along the 
        west limit of the existing project, North 396844.34, East 
        830718.04, thence running southwesterly about 33.72 feet along 
        the west limit of the existing project to a point, North 
396810.80, East 830714.57, thence running southeasterly about 195.42 
feet along the west limit of the existing project to a point, North 
396704.19, East 830878.35, thence running about 544.66 feet along the 
west limit of the existing project to a point, North 396174.35, East 
831004.52, thence running southeasterly about 198.49 feet along the 
west limit of the existing project to the point of beginning.
            (8) New bedford and fairhaven harbor, massachusetts.--The 
        following portions of the project for navigation, New Bedford 
        and Fairhaven Harbor, Massachusetts:
                    (A) A portion of the 25-foot spur channel leading 
                to the west of Fish Island, authorized by the River and 
                Harbor Act of 3 March 1909, beginning at a point with 
                coordinates N232,173.77, E758,791.32, thence running 
                south 27 degrees 36 minutes 52.8 seconds west 38.2 feet 
                to a point N232,139.91, E758,773.61, thence running 
                south 87 degrees 35 minutes 31.6 seconds west 196.84 
                feet to a point N232,131.64, E758,576.94, thence 
                running north 47 degrees 47 minutes 48.4 seconds west 
                502.72 feet to a point N232,469.35, E758,204.54, thence 
                running north 10 degrees 10 minutes 20.3 seconds west 
                438.88 feet to a point N232,901.33, E758,127.03, thence 
                running north 79 degrees 49 minutes 43.1 seconds east 
                121.69 feet to a point N232,922.82, E758,246.81, thence 
                running south 04 degrees 29 minutes 17.6 seconds east 
                52.52 feet to a point N232,870.46, E758,250.92, thence 
                running south 23 degrees 56 minutes 11.2 seconds east 
                49.15 feet to a point N323,825.54, E758,270.86, thence 
                running south 79 degrees 49 minutes 27.0 seconds west 
                88.19 feet to a point N232,809.96, E758,184.06, thence 
                running south 10 degrees 10 minutes 25.7 seconds east 
                314.83 feet to a point N232,500.08, E758,239.67, thence 
                running south 56 degrees 33 minutes 56.1 seconds east 
                583.07 feet to a point N232,178.82, E758,726.25, thence 
                running south 85 degrees 33 minutes 16.0 seconds east 
                to the point of origin.
                    (B) A portion of the 30-foot west maneuvering 
                basin, authorized by the River and Harbor Act of 3 July 
                1930, beginning at a point with coordinates 
                N232,139.91, E758,773.61, thence running north 81 
                degrees 49 minutes 30.1 seconds east 160.76 feet to a 
                point N232,162.77, E758.932.74, thence running north 85 
                degrees 33 minutes 16.0 seconds west 141.85 feet to a 
                point N232,173.77, E758,791.32, thence running south 27 
                degrees 36 minutes 52.8 seconds west to the point of 
                origin.
    (b) Anchorage Area, Clinton Harbor, Connecticut.--That portion of 
the Clinton Harbor, Connecticut, navigation project referred to in 
subsection (a)(2) beginning at a point beginning: N158,444.58, 
E660,220.95, thence running north 79 degrees 37 minutes 14 seconds east 
833.31 feet to a point N158,594.72, E661,040.67, thence running south 
80 degrees 51 minutes 53 seconds east 181.21 feet to a point 
N158,565.95, E661,219.58, thence running north 57 degrees 38 minutes 04 
seconds west 126.02 feet to a point N158,633.41, E660,113.14, thence 
running south 79 degrees 37 minutes 14 seconds west 911.61 feet to a 
point N158,469.17, E660,216.44, thence running south 10 degrees 22 
minutes 46 seconds east 25 feet returning to a point N158,444.58, 
E660,220.95 is redesignated as an anchorage area.
    (c) Anchorage Area, Green Harbor, Massachusetts.--The portion of 
the Green Harbor, Massachusetts, navigation project referred to in 
subsection (a)(7) consisting of a 6-foot deep channel that lies 
northerly of a line whose coordinates are North 394825.00, East 
831660.00 and North 394779.28, East 831570.64 is redesignated as an 
anchorage area.

SEC. 365. AMERICAN AND SACRAMENTO RIVERS, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood damage reduction, American 
and Sacramento Rivers, California, authorized by section 101(a)(1) of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3662-3663), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to include the following improvements 
as part of the overall project:
            (1) Raising the left bank of the non-Federal levee upstream 
        of the Mayhew Drain for a distance of 4,500 feet by an average 
        of 2.5 feet.
            (2) Raising the right bank of the American River levee from 
        1,500 feet upstream to 4,000 feet downstream of the Howe Avenue 
        bridge by an average of 1 feet.
            (3) Modifying the south levee of the Natomas Cross Canal 
        for a distance of 5 miles to ensure that the south levee is 
        consistent with the level of protection provided by the 
        authorized levee along the east bank of the Sacramento River.
            (4) Modifying the north levee of the Natomas Cross Canal 
        for a distance of 5 miles to ensure that the height of the 
        levee is equivalent to the height of the south levee as 
        authorized by paragraph (3).
            (5) Installing gates to the existing Mayhew Drain culvert 
        and pumps to prevent backup of floodwater on the Folsom 
        Boulevard side of the gates.
            (6) Installation of a slurry wall in the north levee of the 
        American River from the east levee of the Natomas east Main 
        Drain upstream for a distance of approximately 1.2 miles.
            (7) Installation of a slurry wall in the north levee of the 
        American River from 300 feet west of Jacob Lane north for a 
        distance of approximately 1 mile to the end of the existing 
        levee.
    (b) Cost Limitations.--Section 101(a)(1)(A) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3662) is amended by striking ``at a 
total cost of'' and all that follows through ``$14,225,000,'' and 
inserting the following: ``at a total cost of $91,900,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $68,925,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $22,975,000,''.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--For purposes of section 103 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213), the modifications 
authorized by this section shall be subject to the same cost sharing in 
effect for the project for flood damage reduction, American and 
Sacramento Rivers, California, authorized by section 101(a)(1) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3662).

SEC. 366. MARTIN, KENTUCKY.

    The project for flood control, Martin, Kentucky, authorized by 
section 202(a) of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 
1981 (94 Stat. 1339) is modified to authorize the Secretary to take all 
necessary measures to prevent future losses that would occur from a 
flood equal in magnitude to a 100-year frequency event.

                           TITLE IV--STUDIES

SEC. 401. UPPER MISSISSIPPI AND ILLINOIS RIVERS LEVEES AND STREAMBANKS 
              PROTECTION.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of erosion damage to levees and 
infrastructure on the upper Mississippi and Illinois Rivers and the 
impact of increased barge and pleasure craft traffic on deterioration 
of levees and other flood control structures on such rivers.

SEC. 402. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

    (a) Development.--The Secretary shall develop a plan to address 
water and related land resources problems and opportunities in the 
Upper Mississippi and Illinois River Basins, extending from Cairo, 
Illinois, to the headwaters of the Mississippi River, in the interest 
of systemic flood damage reduction by means of a mixture of structural 
and nonstructural flood control and floodplain management strategies, 
continued maintenance of the navigation project, management of bank 
caving and erosion, watershed nutrient and sediment management, habitat 
management, recreation needs, and other related purposes.
    (b) Contents.--The plan shall contain recommendations on future 
management plans and actions to be carried out by the responsible 
Federal and non-Federal entities and shall specifically address 
recommendations to authorize construction of a systemic flood control 
project in accordance with a plan for the Upper Mississippi River. The 
plan shall include recommendations for Federal action where appropriate 
and recommendations for follow-on studies for problem areas for which 
data or current technology does not allow immediate solutions.
    (c) Consultation and Use of Existing Data.--The Secretary shall 
consult with appropriate State and Federal agencies and shall make 
maximum use of existing data and ongoing programs and efforts of States 
and Federal agencies in developing the plan.
    (d) Cost Sharing.--Development of the plan under this section shall 
be at Federal expense. Feasibility studies resulting from development 
of such plan shall be subject to cost sharing under section 105 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215).
    (e) Report.--The Secretary shall submit a report that includes the 
comprehensive plan to the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Environment and Public Works of the Senate not later than 3 years after 
the date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 403. EL DORADO, UNION COUNTY, ARKANSAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
improvements to regional water supplies for El Dorado, Union County, 
Arkansas.

SEC. 404. SWEETWATER RESERVOIR, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of the potential water quality 
problems and pollution abatement measures in the watershed in and 
around Sweetwater Reservoir, San Diego County, California.

SEC. 405. WHITEWATER RIVER BASIN, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall undertake and complete a feasibility study for 
flood damage reduction in the Whitewater River basin, California, and, 
based upon the results of such study, give priority consideration to 
including the recommended project, including the Salton Sea wetlands 
restoration project, in the flood mitigation and riverine restoration 
pilot program authorized in section 214 of this Act.

SEC. 406. LITTLE ECONLACKHATCHEE RIVER BASIN, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study of pollution abatement measures 
in the Little Econlackhatchee River basin, Florida.

SEC. 407. PORT EVERGLADES INLET, FLORIDA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a sand bypass project at Port Everglades Inlet, Florida.

SEC. 408. UPPER DES PLAINES RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, ILLINOIS AND 
              WISCONSIN.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is directed to conduct a study of 
the upper Des Plaines River and tributaries, Illinois and Wisconsin, 
upstream of the confluence with Salt Creek at Riverside, Illinois, to 
determine the feasibility of improvements in the interests of flood 
damage reduction, environmental restoration and protection, water 
quality, recreation, and related purposes.
    (b) Special Rule.--In conducting the study, the Secretary may not 
exclude from consideration and evaluation flood damage reduction 
measures based on restrictive policies regarding the frequency of 
flooding, drainage area, and amount of runoff.

SEC. 409. CAMERON PARISH WEST OF CALCASIEU RIVER, LOUISIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for storm damage reduction and environmental 
restoration, Cameron Parish west of Calcasieu River, Louisiana.

SEC. 410. GRAND ISLE AND VICINITY, LOUISIANA.

    In carrying out a study of the storm damage reduction benefits to 
Grand Isle and vicinity, Louisiana, the Secretary shall include 
benefits that a storm damage reduction project for Grand Isle and 
vicinity, Louisiana, may have on the mainland coast of Louisiana as 
project benefits attributable to the Grand Isle project.

SEC. 411. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN SEAWALL, LOUISIANA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall complete a post-authorization 
change report on the project for hurricane-flood protection, Lake 
Pontchartrain, Louisiana, and vicinity, authorized by section 204 of 
the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1077), to incorporate and 
accomplish structural modifications to the seawall fronting protection 
along the south shore of Lake Pontchartrain from the New Basin Canal on 
the west to the Inner harbor Navigation Canal on the east.
    (b) Report.--The Secretary shall ensure expeditious completion of 
the post-authorization change report required by subsection (a) not 
later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this section.

SEC. 412. WESTPORT, MASSACHUSETTS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a navigation project for the town of Westport, 
Massachusetts, and the possible beneficial uses of dredged material for 
shoreline protection and storm damage reduction in the area. In 
determining the benefits of the project, the Secretary shall include 
the benefits derived from using dredged material for shoreline 
protection and storm damage reduction.

SEC. 413. SOUTHWEST VALLEY, ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO.

    The Secretary shall undertake and complete a feasibility study for 
flood damage reduction in the Southwest Valley, Albuquerque, New 
Mexico, and, based upon the results of such study, give priority 
consideration to including the recommended project in the flood 
mitigation and riverine restoration pilot program authorized in section 
214 of this Act.

SEC. 414. CAYUGA CREEK, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood control for Cayuga Creek, New York.

SEC. 415. ARCOLA CREEK WATERSHED, MADISON, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
a project to provide environmental restoration and protection for the 
Arcola Creek watershed, Madison, Ohio.

SEC. 416. WESTERN LAKE ERIE BASIN, OHIO, INDIANA, AND MICHIGAN.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to develop 
measures to improve flood control, navigation, water quality, 
recreation, and fish and wildlife habitat in a comprehensive manner in 
the western Lake Erie basin, Ohio, Indiana, and Michigan, including 
watersheds of the Maumee, Ottawa, and Portage Rivers.
    (b) Cooperation.--In carrying out the study, the Secretary shall 
cooperate with interested Federal, State, and local agencies and 
nongovernmental organizations and consider all relevant programs of 
such agencies.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on the 
results of the study, including findings and recommendations.

SEC. 417. SCHUYLKILL RIVER, NORRISTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood control for Schuylkill River, 
Norristown, Pennsylvania, including improvement to existing stormwater 
drainage systems.

SEC. 418. LAKES MARION AND MOULTRIE, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for Lakes Marion and Moultrie to provide water 
supply, treatment, and distribution to Calhoun, Clarendon, Colleton, 
Dorchester, Orangeburg, and Sumter Counties, South Carolina.

SEC. 419. DAY COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA.

    The Secretary shall conduct an investigation of flooding and other 
water resources problems between the James River and Big Sioux 
watersheds in South Dakota and an assessment of flood damage reduction 
needs of the area.

SEC. 420. CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall include, as part of the study authorized in a 
resolution of the Committee on Public Works and Transportation of the 
House of Representatives, dated August 1, 1990, a review of two 175-
foot-wide barge shelves on either side of the navigation channel at the 
Port of Corpus Christi, Texas.

SEC. 421. MITCHELL'S CUT CHANNEL (CANEY FORK CUT), TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigation, Mitchell's Cut Channel (Caney 
Fork Cut), Texas.

SEC. 422. MOUTH OF COLORADO RIVER, TEXAS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigation at the mouth of the Colorado 
River, Texas, to provide a minimum draft navigation channel extending 
from the Colorado River through Parkers Cut (also known as ``Tiger 
Island Cut''), or an acceptable alternative, to Matagorda Bay.

SEC. 423. KANAWHA RIVER, FAYETTE COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
developing a public port along the Kanawha River in Fayette County, 
West Virginia, at a site known as ``Longacre''.

SEC. 424. WEST VIRGINIA PORTS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
expanding public port development in West Virginia along the Ohio River 
and navigable portion of the Kanawha River from its mouth to river mile 
91.0.

SEC. 425. GREAT LAKES REGION COMPREHENSIVE STUDY.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive study of 
the Great Lakes region to ensure the future use, management, and 
protection of water and related resources of the Great Lakes basin. 
Such study shall include a comprehensive management plan specifically 
for St. Clair River and Lake St. Clair.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 4 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Transportation 
and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on 
Environment and Public Works of the Senate a report that includes the 
strategic plan for Corps of Engineers programs in the Great Lakes basin 
and details of proposed Corps of Engineers environmental, navigation, 
and flood damage reduction projects in the region.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $1,200,000 for fiscal years 2000 
through 2003.

SEC. 426. NUTRIENT LOADING RESULTING FROM DREDGED MATERIAL DISPOSAL.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of nutrient loading 
that occurs as a result of discharges of dredged material into open-
water sites in the Chesapeake Bay.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 18 months after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the 
results of the study.

                   TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

SEC. 501. CORPS ASSUMPTION OF NRCS PROJECTS.

    (a) Llagas Creek, California.--The Secretary is authorized to 
complete the remaining reaches of the Natural Resources Conservation 
Service's flood control project at Llagas Creek, California, undertaken 
pursuant to section 5 of the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention 
Act (16 U.S.C. 1005), substantially in accordance with the Natural 
Resources Conservation Service watershed plan for Llagas Creek, 
Department of Agriculture, and in accordance with the requirements of 
local cooperation as specified in section 4 of such Act, at a total 
cost of $45,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $21,800,000 and 
an estimated non-Federal cost of $23,200,000.
    (b) Thornton Reservoir, Cook County, Illinois.--
            (1) In general.--The Thornton Reservoir project, an element 
        of the project for flood control, Chicagoland Underflow Plan, 
        Illinois, authorized by section 3(a)(5) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 4013), is modified to 
        authorize the Secretary to include additional permanent flood 
        control storage attributable to the Natural Resources 
        Conservation Service Thornton Reservoir (Structure 84), Little 
        Calumet River Watershed, Illinois, approved under the Watershed 
        Protection and Flood Prevention Act (16 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.).
            (2) Cost sharing.--Costs for the Thornton Reservoir project 
        shall be shared in accordance with section 103 of the Water 
        Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213).
            (3) Transitional storage.--The Secretary of Agriculture may 
        cooperate with non-Federal interests to provide, on a 
        transitional basis, flood control storage for the Natural 
        Resources Conservation Service Thornton Reservoir (Structure 
        84) in the west lobe of the Thornton quarry in advance of 
        Corps' construction.
            (4) Crediting.--The Secretary may credit against the non-
        Federal share of the Thornton Reservoir project all design, 
        lands, easements, rights-of-way (as of the date of 
        authorization), and construction costs incurred by the non-
        Federal interests before the signing of the project cooperation 
        agreement.
            (5) Reevaluation report.--The Secretary shall determine the 
        credits authorized by paragraph (4) that are integral to the 
        Thornton Reservoir project and the current total project costs 
        based on a limited reevaluation report.

SEC. 502. CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE.

    Section 219(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4836-4837) is amended by striking paragraphs (5) and (6) and 
inserting the following:
            ``(5) $25,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(2);
            ``(6) $20,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(9);
            ``(7) $30,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(16); and
            ``(8) $30,000,000 for the project described in subsection 
        (c)(17).''.

SEC. 503. CONTAMINATED SEDIMENT DREDGING TECHNOLOGY.

    (a) Contaminated Sediment Dredging Project.--
            (1) Review.--The Secretary shall conduct a review of 
        innovative dredging technologies designed to minimize or 
        eliminate contamination of a water column upon removal of 
        contaminated sediments. The Secretary shall complete such 
        review by June 1, 2001.
            (2) Testing.--After completion of the review under 
        paragraph (1), the Secretary shall select the technology of 
        those reviewed that the Secretary determines will increase the 
        effectiveness of removing contaminated sediments and 
        significantly reduce contamination of the water column. Not 
        later than December 31, 2001, the Secretary shall enter into an 
        agreement with a public or private entity to test such 
        technology in the vicinity of Peoria Lakes, Illinois.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $2,000,000.

SEC. 504. DAM SAFETY.

    (a) Assistance.--The Secretary is authorized to provide assistance 
to enhance dam safety at the following locations:
            (1) Healdsburg Veteran's Memorial Dam, California
            (2) Deep River Dam, Lake Station, Indiana
            (3) Felix Dam, Pennsylvania
            (4) Kehly Run Dam, Pennsylvania
            (5) Owl Creek Reservoir, Pennsylvania
            (6) Sweet Arrow Lake Dam, Pennsylvania
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $6,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 505. GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS.

    Section 401(a)(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
(110 Stat. 3763) is amended by adding at the end the following: 
``Nonprofit public or private entities may contribute all or a portion 
of the non-Federal share.''.

SEC. 506. SEA LAMPREY CONTROL MEASURES IN THE GREAT LAKES.

    (a) In General.--In conjunction with the Great Lakes Fishery 
Commission, the Secretary is authorized to undertake a program for the 
control of sea lampreys in and around waters of the Great Lakes. The 
program undertaken pursuant to this section may include projects which 
consist of either structural or nonstructural measures or a combination 
thereof.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--Projects carried out under this section on lands 
owned by the United States shall be carried out at full Federal 
expense. The non-Federal share of the cost of any such project 
undertaken on lands not in Federal ownership shall be 35 percent.
    (c) Non-Federal Interests.--Notwithstanding section 221(b) of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b(b)), the Secretary, after 
coordination with the appropriate State and local government officials 
having jurisdiction over an area in which a project under this section 
will be carried out, may allow a nonprofit entity to serve as the non-
Federal interest for the project.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $2,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2000 through 2005.

SEC. 507. MAINTENANCE OF NAVIGATION CHANNELS.

    Section 509(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3759) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(12) Acadiana Navigation Channel, Louisiana.
            ``(13) Contraband Bayou, Louisiana, as part of the 
        Calcasieu River and Pass Ship Channel.
            ``(14) Lake Wallula Navigation Channel, Washington.
            ``(15) Wadley Pass (also known as McGriff Pass), Suwanee 
        River, Florida.''.

SEC. 508. MEASUREMENT OF LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSIONS.

    Section 1142(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (42 
U.S.C. 1962d-20 note; 100 Stat. 4253) is amended by striking 
``$250,000'' and inserting ``$1,250,000''.

SEC. 509. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.

    (a) Authorized Activities.--Section 1103(e)(1) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652(e)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``and'' at the end of subparagraph (A);
            (2) in subparagraph (B) by striking ``long-term resource 
        monitoring program; and'' and inserting ``long-term resource 
        monitoring, computerized data inventory and analysis, and 
        applied research program.''; and
            (3) by striking subparagraph (C) and inserting the 
        following:
``In carrying out subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall establish an 
independent technical advisory committee to review projects, monitoring 
plans, and habitat and natural resource needs assessments.''.
    (b) Reports.--Section 1103(e)(2) of such Act (33 U.S.C. 652(e)(2)) 
is amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) Reports.--Not later than December 31, 2004, and not 
        later than December 31st of every sixth year thereafter, the 
        Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of the Interior 
and the States of Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin, 
shall transmit to Congress a report that--
                    ``(A) contains an evaluation of the programs 
                described in paragraph (1);
                    ``(B) describes the accomplishments of each of such 
                programs;
                    ``(C) provides updates of a systemic habitat needs 
                assessment; and
                    ``(D) identifies any needed adjustments in the 
                authorization.''.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 1103(e) of such Act 
(33 U.S.C. 652(e)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3) by striking ``not to exceed'' and all 
        that follows before the period at the end and inserting 
        ``$22,750,000 for fiscal year 1999 and each fiscal year 
        thereafter'';
            (2) in paragraph (4) by striking ``not to exceed'' and all 
        that follows before the period at the end and inserting 
        ``$10,420,000'' for fiscal year 1999 and each fiscal year 
        thereafter''; and
            (3) by striking paragraph (5) and inserting the following:
            ``(5) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated to carry out paragraph (1)(A) $350,000 for 
        each of fiscal years 1999 through 2009.''.
    (d) Transfer of Amounts.--Section 1103(e)(6) of such Act is amended 
to read as follows:
            ``(6) Transfer of amounts.--For fiscal year 1999, and each 
        fiscal year thereafter, the Secretary, in consultation with the 
        Secretary of the Interior and the States of Illinois, Iowa, 
        Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin, may transfer not to exceed 
        20 percent of the amounts appropriated to carry out 
        subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1) to the amounts 
        appropriated to carry out the other of such subparagraphs.''.
    (e) Habitat Needs Assessment.--Section 1103(h)(2) of such Act (33 
U.S.C. 652(h)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``The 
Secretary shall complete the on-going habitat needs assessment 
conducted under this paragraph not later than September 30, 2000, and 
shall include in each report required by subsection (e)(2) the most 
recent habitat needs assessment conducted under this paragraph.''.
    (f) Conforming Amendments.--Section 1103 of such Act (33 U.S.C. 
652) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (e)(7) by striking ``paragraphs (1)(B) 
        and (1)(C)'' and inserting ``paragraph (1)(B)''; and
            (2) in subsection (f)(2)--
                    (A) by striking ``(2)(A)'' and inserting ``(2)''; 
                and
                    (B) by striking subparagraph (B).

SEC. 510. ATLANTIC COAST OF NEW YORK MONITORING.

    Section 404(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4863) is amended by striking ``1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, and 1997'' 
and inserting ``1993 through 2003''.

SEC. 511. WATER CONTROL MANAGEMENT.

    (a) In General.--In evaluating potential improvements for water 
control management activities and consolidation of water control 
management centers, the Secretary may consider a regionalized water 
control management plan but may not implement such a plan until the 
date on which a report is transmitted under subsection (b).
    (b) Report.--Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure and the Committee on Appropriations 
of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and 
Public Works and the Committee on Appropriations of the Senate a report 
containing the following:
            (1) A description of the primary objectives of streamlining 
        water control management activities.
            (2) A description of the benefits provided by streamlining 
        water control management activities through consolidation of 
        centers for such activities.
            (3) A determination of whether or not benefits to users of 
        regional water control management centers will be retained in 
        each district office of the Corps of Engineers that does not 
        have a regional center.
            (4) A determination of whether or not users of such 
        regional centers will receive a higher level of benefits from 
        streamlining water management control management activities.
            (5) A list of the Members of Congress who represent a 
        district that currently includes a water control management 
        center that is to be eliminated under a proposed regionalized 
        plan.

SEC. 512. BENEFICIAL USE OF DREDGED MATERIAL.

    The Secretary is authorized to carry out the following projects 
under section 204 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 
U.S.C. 2326):
            (1) Bodega bay, california.--A project to make beneficial 
        use of dredged materials from a Federal navigation project in 
        Bodega Bay, California.
            (2) Sabine refuge, louisiana.--A project to make beneficial 
        use of dredged materials from Federal navigation projects in 
        the vicinity of Sabine Refuge, Louisiana.
            (3) Hancock, harrison, and jackson counties, mississippi.--
        A project to make beneficial use of dredged material from a 
        Federal navigation project in Hancock, Harrison, and Jackson 
        Counties, Mississippi.
            (4) Rose city marsh, orange county, texas.--A project to 
        make beneficial use of dredged material from a Federal 
        navigation project in Rose City Marsh, Orange County, Texas.
            (5) Bessie heights marsh, orange county, texas.--A project 
        to make beneficial use of dredged material from a Federal 
        navigation project in Bessie Heights Marsh, Orange County, 
        Texas.

SEC. 513. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE.

    Section 507(2) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3758) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) Expansion and improvement of Long Pine Run Dam and 
        associated water infrastructure in accordance with the 
        requirements of subsections (b) through (e) of section 313 of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4845) at 
        a total cost of $20,000,000.''.

SEC. 514. LOWER MISSOURI RIVER AQUATIC RESTORATION PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 1 year after funds are made 
available for such purposes, the Secretary shall complete a 
comprehensive report--
            (1) identifying a general implementation strategy and 
        overall plan for environmental restoration and protection along 
        the Lower Missouri River between Gavins Point Dam and the 
        confluence of the Missouri and Mississippi Rivers; and
            (2) recommending individual environmental restoration 
        projects that can be considered by the Secretary for 
        implementation under section 206 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330; 110 Stat. 3679-3680).
    (b) Scope of Projects.--Any environmental restoration projects 
recommended under subsection (a) shall provide for such activities and 
measures as the Secretary determines to be necessary to protect and 
restore fish and wildlife habitat without adversely affecting private 
property rights or water related needs of the region surrounding the 
Missouri River, including flood control, navigation, and enhancement of 
water supply, and shall include some or all of the following 
components:
            (1) Modification and improvement of navigation training 
        structures to protect and restore fish and wildlife habitat.
            (2) Modification and creation of side channels to protect 
        and restore fish and wildlife habitat.
            (3) Restoration and creation of fish and wildlife habitat.
            (4) Physical and biological monitoring for evaluating the 
        success of the projects.
    (c) Coordination.--To the maximum extent practicable, the Secretary 
shall integrate projects carried out in accordance with this section 
with other Federal, tribal, and State restoration activities.
    (d) Cost Sharing.--The report under subsection (a) shall be 
undertaken at full Federal expense.

SEC. 515. AQUATIC RESOURCES RESTORATION IN THE NORTHWEST.

    (a) In General.--In cooperation with other Federal agencies, the 
Secretary is authorized to develop and implement projects for fish 
screens, fish passage devices, and other similar measures agreed to by 
non-Federal interests and relevant Federal agencies to mitigate adverse 
impacts associated with irrigation system water diversions by local 
governmental entities in the States of Oregon, Washington, Montana, and 
Idaho.
    (b) Procedure and Participation.--
            (1) Consultation requirement; use of existing data.--In 
        providing assistance under subsection (a), the Secretary shall 
        consult with other Federal, State, and local agencies and make 
        maximum use of data and studies in existence on the date of 
        enactment of this Act.
            (2) Participation by non-federal interests.--Participation 
        by non-Federal interests in projects under this section shall 
        be voluntary. The Secretary shall not take any action under 
        this section that will result in a non-Federal interest being 
        held financially responsible for an action under a project 
        unless the non-Federal interest has voluntarily agreed to 
        participate in the project.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--Projects carried out under this section on lands 
owned by the United States shall be carried out at full Federal 
expense. The non-Federal share of the cost of any such project 
undertaken on lands not in Federal ownership shall be 35 percent.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000 for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 1999.

SEC. 516. INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES FOR WATERSHED RESTORATION.

    The Secretary shall use, and encourage the use of, innovative 
treatment technologies, including membrane technologies, for watershed 
and environmental restoration and protection projects involving water 
quality.

SEC. 517. ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION.

    (a) Atlanta, Georgia.--Section 219(c)(2) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835) is amended by inserting before 
the period ``and watershed restoration and development in the regional 
Atlanta watershed, including Big Creek and Rock Creek''.
    (b) Paterson and Passaic Valley, New Jersey.--Section 219(c)(9) of 
such Act (106 Stat. 4836) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(9) Paterson, passaic county, and passaic valley, new 
        jersey.--Drainage facilities to alleviate flooding problems on 
        Getty Avenue in the vicinity of St. Joseph's Hospital for the 
        City of Paterson, New Jersey, and Passaic County, New Jersey, 
        and innovative facilities to manage and treat additional flows 
        in the Passaic Valley, Passaic River basin, New Jersey.''.

SEC. 518. EXPEDITED CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN PROJECTS.

    The Secretary shall expedite completion of the reports for the 
following projects and proceed directly to project planning, 
engineering, and design:
            (1) Arroyo Pasajero, San Joaquin River basin, California, 
        project for flood control.
            (2) Success Dam, Tule River, California, project for flood 
        control and water supply.
            (3) Alafia Channel, Tampa Harbor, Florida, project for 
        navigation.

SEC. 519. DOG RIVER, ALABAMA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to establish, in 
cooperation with non-Federal interests, a pilot project to restore 
natural water depths in the Dog River, Alabama, between its mouth and 
the Interstate Route 10 crossing, and in the downstream portion of its 
principal tributaries.
    (b) Form of Assistance.--Assistance provided under subsection (a) 
shall be in the form of design and construction of water-related 
resource protection and development projects affecting the Dog River, 
including environmental restoration and recreational navigation.
    (c) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project carried out with assistance under this section shall be 90 
percent.
    (d) Lands, Easements, and Rights-of-Way.--The non-Federal sponsor 
provide all lands, easements, rights of way, relocations, and dredged 
material disposal areas including retaining dikes required for the 
project.
    (e) Operation Maintenance.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, or rehabilitation of the 
project carried out with assistance under this section shall be 100 
percent.
    (f) Credit Toward Non-Federal Share.--The value of the lands, 
easements, rights of way, relocations, and dredged material disposal 
areas, including retaining dikes, provided by the non-Federal sponsor 
shall be credited toward the non-Federal share.

SEC. 520. ELBA, ALABAMA.

    The Secretary is authorized to repair and rehabilitate a levee in 
the city of Elba, Alabama at a total cost of $12,900,000.

 SEC. 521. GENEVA, ALABAMA.

    The Secretary is authorized to repair and rehabilitate a levee in 
the city of Geneva, Alabama at a total cost of $16,600,000.

 SEC. 522. NAVAJO RESERVATION, ARIZONA, NEW MEXICO, AND UTAH.

    (a) In General.--In cooperation with other appropriate Federal and 
local agencies, the Secretary shall undertake a survey of, and provide 
technical, planning, and design assistance for, watershed management, 
restoration, and development on the Navajo Indian Reservation, Arizona, 
New Mexico, and Utah.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--The Federal share of the cost of activities 
carried out under this section shall be 75 percent. Funds made 
available under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance 
Act (25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.) may be used by the Navajo Nation in meeting 
the non-Federal share of the cost of such activities.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $12,000,000 for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 1999.

SEC. 523. AUGUSTA AND DEVALLS BLUFF, ARKANSAS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to perform operations, 
maintenance, and rehabilitation on 37 miles of levees in and around 
Augusta and Devalls Bluff, Arkansas.
    (b) Reimbursement.--After performing the operations, maintenance, 
and rehabilitation under subsection (a), the Secretary shall seek 
reimbursement from the Secretary of the Interior of an amount equal to 
the costs allocated to benefits to a Federal wildlife refuge of such 
operations, maintenance, and rehabilitation.

SEC. 524. BEAVER LAKE, ARKANSAS.

    (a) Water Supply Storage Reallocation.--The Secretary shall 
reallocate approximately 31,000 additional acre-feet at Beaver Lake, 
Arkansas, to water supply storage at no additional cost to the Beaver 
Water District or the Carroll-Boone Water District above the amount 
that has already been contracted for. At no time may the bottom of the 
conservation pool be at an elevation that is less than 1,076 feet NGVD.
    (b) Contract Pricing.--The contract price for additional storage 
for the Carroll-Boone Water District beyond that which is provided for 
in subsection (a) shall be based on the original construction cost of 
Beaver Lake and adjusted to the 1998 price level net of inflation 
between the date of initiation of construction and the date of 
enactment of this Act.

SEC. 525. BEAVER LAKE TROUT PRODUCTION FACILITY, ARKANSAS.

    (a) Expedited Construction.--The Secretary shall construct, under 
the authority of section 105 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1976 (90 Stat. 2921) and section 1135 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4251-4252), the Beaver Lake trout 
hatchery as expeditiously as possible, but in no event later than 
September 30, 2002.
    (b) Mitigation Plan.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary, in conjunction with the State of 
Arkansas, shall prepare a plan for the mitigation of effects of the 
Beaver Dam project on Beaver Lake. Such plan shall provide for 
construction of the Beaver Lake trout production facility and related 
facilities.

SEC. 526. CHINO DAIRY PRESERVE, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Technical Assistance.--The Secretary, in coordination with the 
heads of other Federal agencies, shall provide technical assistance to 
State and local agencies in the study, design, and implementation of 
measures for flood damage reduction and environmental restoration and 
protection in the Santa Ana River watershed, California, with 
particular emphasis on structural and nonstructural measures in the 
vicinity of the Chino Dairy Preserve.
    (b) Comprehensive Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a feasibility 
study to determine the most cost-effective plan for flood damage 
reduction and environmental restoration and protection in the vicinity 
of the Chino Dairy Preserve, Santa Ana River watershed, Orange County 
and San Bernardino County, California.

SEC. 527. NOVATO, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall carry out a project for flood control under 
section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) at Rush 
Creek, Novato, California.

SEC. 528. ORANGE AND SAN DIEGO COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary, in cooperation with local governments, may prepare 
special area management plans in Orange and San Diego Counties, 
California, to demonstrate the effectiveness of using such plans to 
provide information regarding aquatic resources. The Secretary may use 
such plans in making regulatory decisions and issue permits consistent 
with such plans.

SEC. 529. SALTON SEA, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Technical Assistance.--The Secretary, in coordination with 
other Federal agencies, shall provide technical assistance to Federal, 
State, and local agencies in the study, design, and implementation of 
measures for the environmental restoration and protection of the Salton 
Sea, California.
    (b) Study.--The Secretary, in coordination with other Federal, 
State, and local agencies, shall conduct a study to determine the most 
effective plan for the Corps of Engineers to assist in the 
environmental restoration and protection of the Salton Sea, California.

SEC. 530. SANTA CRUZ HARBOR, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary is authorized to modify the cooperative agreement 
with the Santa Cruz Port District, California, to reflect unanticipated 
additional dredging effort and to extend such agreement for 10 years.

SEC. 531. POINT BEACH, MILFORD, CONNECTICUT.

    (a) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of Federal 
funds that may be expended for the project for hurricane and storm 
damage reduction, Point Beach, Milford, Connecticut, shall be 
$3,000,000.
    (b) Revision of Project Cooperation Agreement.--The Secretary shall 
revise the project cooperation agreement for the project referred to in 
subsection (a) to take into account the change in the Federal 
participation in such project.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to 
affect any cost-sharing requirement applicable to the project referred 
to in subsection (a) under section 101 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (31 U.S.C. 2211).

SEC. 532. LOWER ST. JOHNS RIVER BASIN, FLORIDA.

    (a) Computer Model.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary may apply the computer model 
        developed under the St. Johns River basin feasibility study to 
        assist non-Federal interests in developing strategies for 
        improving water quality in the Lower St. Johns River basin, 
        Florida.
            (2) Cost sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
        assistance provided under this subsection shall be 50 percent.
    (b) Topographic Survey.--The Secretary is authorized to provide 1-
foot contour topographic survey maps of the Lower St. Johns River 
basin, Florida, to non-Federal interests for analyzing environmental 
data and establishing benchmarks for subbasins.

SEC. 533. SHORELINE PROTECTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, LAKE 
              ALLATOONA, GEORGIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the 
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, is authorized to 
carry out the following water-related environmental restoration and 
resource protection activities to restore Lake Allatoona and the Etowah 
River in Georgia:
            (1) Lake allatoona/etowah river shoreline restoration 
        design.--Develop pre-construction design measures to alleviate 
        shoreline erosion and sedimentation problems.
            (2) Little river environmental restoration.--Conduct a 
        feasibility study to evaluate environmental problems and 
        recommending environmental infrastructure restoration measures 
        for the Little River within Lake Allatoona, Georgia.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated for fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1999--
            (1) $850,000 to carry out subsection (a)(1); and
            (2) $250,000 to carry out subsection (a)(2).

SEC. 534. MAYO'S BAR LOCK AND DAM, COOSA RIVER, ROME, GEORGIA.

    The Secretary is authorized to provide technical assistance, 
including planning, engineering, and design assistance, for the 
reconstruction of the Mayo's Bar Lock and Dam, Coosa River, Rome, 
Georgia. The non-Federal share of assistance under this section shall 
be 50 percent.

SEC. 535. COMPREHENSIVE FLOOD IMPACT RESPONSE MODELING SYSTEM, 
              CORALVILLE RESERVOIR AND IOWA RIVER WATERSHED, IOWA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the University 
of Iowa, shall conduct a study and develop a Comprehensive Flood Impact 
Response Modeling System for Coralville Reservoir and the Iowa River 
watershed, Iowa.
    (b) Contents of Study.--The study shall include--
            (1) an evaluation of the combined hydrologic, geomorphic, 
        environmental, economic, social, and recreational impacts of 
        operating strategies within the Iowa River watershed;
            (2) development of an integrated, dynamic flood impact 
        model; and
            (3) development of a rapid response system to be used 
        during flood and other emergency situations.
    (c) Report to Congress.--Not later than 5 years after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a 
report containing the results of the study and modeling system together 
with such recommendations as the Secretary determines to be 
appropriate.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $900,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2000 through 2004.

SEC. 536. ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE IN ILLINOIS.

    The Secretary may carry out the project for Georgetown, Illinois, 
and the project for Olney, Illinois, referred to in House Report Number 
104-741, accompanying Public Law 104-182.

SEC. 537. KANOPOLIS LAKE, KANSAS.

    (a) Water Storage.--The Secretary shall offer to the State of 
Kansas the right to purchase water storage in Kanopolis Lake, Kansas, 
at a price calculated in accordance with and in a manner consistent 
with the terms of the memorandum of understanding entitled ``Memorandum 
of Understanding Between the State of Kansas and the U.S. Department of 
the Army Concerning the Purchase of Municipal and Industrial Water 
Supply Storage'', dated December 11, 1985.
    (b) Effective Date.--For the purposes of this section, the 
effective date of that memorandum of understanding shall be deemed to 
be the date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 538. SOUTHERN AND EASTERN KENTUCKY.

    Section 531(h) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3774) is amended by striking ``$10,000,000'' and inserting 
``$25,000,000''.

SEC. 539. SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA.

    Section 533(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3775) is amended by striking ``$100,000,000'' and inserting 
``$200,000,000''.

SEC. 540. SNUG HARBOR, MARYLAND.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in coordination with the Director 
of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, is authorized--
            (1) to provide technical assistance to the residents of 
        Snug Harbor, in the vicinity of Berlin, Maryland, for purposes 
        of flood damage reduction;
            (2) to conduct a study of a project for nonstructural 
        measures for flood damage reduction in the vicinity of Snug 
        Harbor, Maryland, taking into account the relationship of both 
        the Ocean City Inlet and Assateague Island to the flooding; and
            (3) after completion of the study, to carry out the project 
        under the authority of section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 
        1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s).
    (b) FEMA Assistance.--The Director, in coordination with the 
Secretary and under the authorities of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5121 note), may provide 
technical assistance and nonstructural measures for flood damage 
mitigation in the vicinity of Snug Harbor, Maryland.
    (c) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of assistance 
under this section shall not exceed $3,000,000. The non-Federal share 
of such cost shall be determined in accordance with the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 or the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 
Emergency Assistance Act, as appropriate.

SEC. 541. WELCH POINT, ELK RIVER, CECIL COUNTY, AND CHESAPEAKE CITY, 
              MARYLAND.

    (a) Spillage of Dredged Materials.--The Secretary shall carry out a 
study to determine if the spillage of dredged materials that were 
removed as part of the project for navigation, Inland Waterway from 
Delaware River to Chesapeake Bay, Delaware and Maryland, authorized by 
the first section of the Act of August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 1030), is a 
significant impediment to vessels transiting the Elk River near Welch 
Point, Maryland. If the Secretary determines that the spillage is an 
impediment to navigation, the Secretary may conduct such dredging as 
may be required to permit navigation on the river.
    (b) Damage to Water Supply.--The Secretary shall carry out a study 
to determine if additional compensation is required to fully compensate 
the city of Chesapeake, Maryland, for damage to the city's water supply 
resulting from dredging of the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal project. 
If the Secretary determines that such additional compensation is 
required, the Secretary may provide the compensation to the city of 
Chesapeake.

SEC. 542. WEST VIEW SHORES, CECIL COUNTY, MARYLAND.

    Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary shall carry out an investigation of the contamination of the 
well system in West View Shores, Cecil County, Maryland. If the 
Secretary determines that the disposal site from any Federal navigation 
project has contributed to the contamination of the wells, the 
Secretary may provide alternative water supplies, including replacement 
of wells, at full Federal expense.

SEC. 543. RESTORATION PROJECTS FOR MARYLAND, PENNSYLVANIA, AND WEST 
              VIRGINIA.

    Section 539 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3776-3777) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1) by striking ``technical'';
            (2) in subsection (a)(1) by inserting ``(or in the case of 
        projects located on lands owned by the United States, to 
        Federal interests)'' after ``interests'';
            (3) in subsection (a)(3) by inserting ``or in conjunction'' 
        after ``consultation''; and
            (4) by inserting at the end of subsection (d) the 
        following: ``Funds authorized to be appropriated to carry out 
        section 340 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
        Stat. 4856) are authorized for projects undertaken under 
        subsection (a)(1)(B).''.

SEC. 544. CAPE COD CANAL RAILROAD BRIDGE, BUZZARDS BAY, MASSACHUSETTS.

    (a) Alternative Transportation.--The Secretary is authorized to 
provide up to $300,000 for alternative transportation that may arise as 
a result of the operation, maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation of 
the Cape Cod Canal Railroad Bridge.
    (b) Operation and Maintenance Contract Renegotiation.--Not later 
than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary 
shall enter into negotiation with the owner of the railroad right-of-
way for the Cape Cod Canal Railroad Bridge for the purpose of 
establishing the rights and responsibities for the operation and 
maintenance of the Bridge. The Secretary is authorized to include in 
any new contract the termination of the prior contract numbered ER-
W175-ENG-1.

SEC. 545. ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI.

    (a) Demonstration Project.--The Secretary, in consultation with 
local officials, shall conduct a demonstration project to improve water 
quality in the vicinity of St. Louis, Missouri.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $1,700,000 to carry out this section.

 SEC. 546. BEAVER BRANCH OF BIG TIMBER CREEK, NEW JERSEY.

    Upon request of the State of New Jersey or a political subdivision 
thereof, the Secretary may compile and disseminate information on 
floods and flood damages, including identification of areas subject to 
inundation by floods, and provide technical assistance regarding 
floodplain management for Beaver Branch of Big Timber Creek, New 
Jersey.

SEC. 547. LAKE ONTARIO AND ST. LAWRENCE RIVER WATER LEVELS, NEW YORK.

    Upon request, the Secretary shall provide technical assistance to 
the International Joint Commission and the St. Lawrence River Board of 
Control in undertaking studies on the effects of fluctuating water 
levels on the natural environment, recreational boating, property 
flooding, and erosion along the shorelines of Lake Ontario and the St. 
Lawrence River in New York. The Commission and Board are encouraged to 
conduct such studies in a comprehensive and thorough manner before 
implementing any change to water regulation Plan 1958-D.

SEC. 548. NEW YORK-NEW JERSEY HARBOR, NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY.

    The Secretary may enter into cooperative agreements with non-
Federal interests to investigate, develop, and support measures for 
sediment management and reduction of contaminant sources which affect 
navigation in the Port of New York-New Jersey and the environmental 
conditions of the New York-New Jersey Harbor estuary. Such 
investigation shall include an analysis of the economic and 
environmental benefits and costs of potential sediment management and 
contaminant reduction measures.

SEC. 549. SEA GATE REACH, CONEY ISLAND, NEW YORK, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary is authorized to construct a project for shoreline 
protection which includes a beachfill with revetment and T-groin for 
the Sea Gate Reach on Coney Island, New York, as identified in the 
March 1998 report prepared for the Corps of Engineers, New York 
District, entitled ``Field Data Gathering, Project Performance Analysis 
and Design Alternative Solutions to Improve Sandfill Retention'', at a 
total cost of $9,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $5,850,000 
and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,150,000.

SEC. 550. WOODLAWN, NEW YORK.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide planning, design, and 
other technical assistance to non-Federal interests for identifying and 
mitigating sources of contamination at Woodlawn Beach in Woodlawn, New 
York.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of assistance 
provided under this section shall be 50 percent.

SEC. 551. FLOODPLAIN MAPPING, NEW YORK.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide assistance for a 
project to develop maps identifying 100- and 500-year flood inundation 
areas in the State of New York.
    (b) Requirements.--Maps developed under the project shall include 
hydrologic and hydraulic information and shall accurately show the 
flood inundation of each property by flood risk in the floodplain. The 
maps shall be produced in a high resolution format and shall be made 
available to all flood prone areas in the State of New York in an 
electronic format.
    (c) Participation of FEMA.--The Secretary and the non-Federal 
sponsor of the project shall work with the Director of the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency to ensure the validity of the maps 
developed under the project for flood insurance purposes.
    (d) Forms of Assistance.--In carrying out the project, the 
Secretary may enter into contracts or cooperative agreements with the 
non-Federal sponsor or provide reimbursements of project costs.
    (e) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of the project 
shall be 75 percent.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $12,000,000 for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 1998.

SEC. 552. WHITE OAK RIVER, NORTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine if water quality 
deterioration and sedimentation of the White Oak River, North Carolina, 
are the result of the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway navigation 
project. If the Secretary determines that the water quality 
deterioration and sedimentation are the result of the project, the 
Secretary shall take appropriate measures to mitigate the deterioration 
and sedimentation.

SEC. 553. TOUSSAINT RIVER, CARROLL TOWNSHIP, OTTAWA COUNTY, OHIO.

    The Secretary is authorized to provide technical assistance for the 
removal of military ordnance from the Toussaint River, Carroll 
Township, Ottawa County, Ohio.

SEC. 554. SARDIS RESERVOIR, OKLAHOMA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall accept from the State of 
Oklahoma or an agent of the State an amount, as determined under 
subsection (b), as prepayment of 100 percent of the water supply cost 
obligation of the State under Contract No. DACW56-74-JC-0314 for water 
supply storage at Sardis Reservoir, Oklahoma.
    (b) Determination of Amount.--The amount to be paid by the State of 
Oklahoma under subsection (a) shall be subject to adjustment in 
accordance with accepted discount purchase methods for Federal 
Government properties as determined by an independent accounting firm 
designated by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. The 
cost of such determination shall be paid for by the State of Oklahoma 
or an agent of the State.
    (c) Effect.--Nothing in this section affects any of the rights or 
obligations of the parties to the contract referred to in subsection 
(a).

SEC. 555. WAURIKA LAKE, OKLAHOMA, WATER CONVEYANCE FACILITIES.

    The requirement for the Waurika Project Master Conservancy District 
to repay the $2,900,000 in costs (including interest) resulting from 
the October 1991 settlement of the claim before the United States 
Claims Court related to construction of the water conveyance facilities 
authorized by the first section of Public Law 88-253 (77 Stat. 841) is 
waived.

SEC. 556. SKINNER BUTTE PARK, EUGENE, OREGON.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of the south bank 
of the Willamette River, in the area of Skinner Butte Park from Ferry 
Street Bridge to the Valley River footbridge, to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project to stabilize the river bank, and 
to restore and enhance riverine habitat, using a combination of 
structural and bioengineering techniques.
    (b) Construction.--If, upon completion of the study, the Secretary 
determines that the project is feasible, the Secretary shall 
participate with non-Federal interests in the construction of the 
project.
    (c) Cost Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of the project 
shall be 35 percent.
    (d) Lands, Easements, and Rights-of-Way.--The non-Federal interest 
shall provide lands, easements, rights-of-way, relocations, and dredged 
material disposal areas necessary for construction of the project. The 
value of such items shall be credited toward the non-Federal share of 
the cost of the project.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $1,000,000 for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 1999.

SEC. 557. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OREGON.

    The Secretary, Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, 
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, and heads of 
other appropriate Federal agencies shall, using existing authorities, 
assist the State of Oregon in developing and implementing a 
comprehensive basin-wide strategy in the Willamette River basin of 
Oregon for coordinated and integrated management of land and water 
resources to improve water quality, reduce flood hazards, ensure 
sustainable economic activity, and restore habitat for native fish and 
wildlife. The heads of such Federal agencies may provide technical 
assistance, staff and financial support for development of the basin-
wide management strategy. The heads of Federal agencies shall seek to 
exercise flexibility in administrative actions and allocation of 
funding to reduce barriers to efficient and effective implementing of 
the strategy.

SEC. 558. BRADFORD AND SULLIVAN COUNTIES, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary is authorized to provide assistance for water-related 
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and development 
projects in Bradford and Sullivan Counties, Pennsylvania, using the 
funds and authorities provided in title I of the Energy and Water 
Development Appropriations Act, 1999 (Public Law 105-245) under the 
heading ``Construction, General'' (112 Stat. 1840) for similar projects 
in Lackawanna, Lycoming, Susquehanna, Wyoming, Pike, and Monroe 
Counties, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 559. ERIE HARBOR, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Secretary may reimburse the appropriate non-Federal interest 
not more than $78,366 for architect and engineering costs incurred in 
connection with the Erie Harbor basin navigation project, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 560. POINT MARION LOCK AND DAM, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The project for navigation, Point Marion Lock and Dam, Borough of 
Point Marion, Pennsylvania, as authorized by section 301(a) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4110), is modified 
to direct the Secretary, in the operation and maintenance of the 
project, to mitigate damages to the shoreline, at a total cost of 
$2,000,000. The cost of the mitigation shall be allocated as an 
operation and maintenance cost of a Federal navigation project.

SEC. 561. SEVEN POINTS' HARBOR, PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized, at full Federal 
expense, to construct a breakwater-dock combination at the entrance to 
Seven Points' Harbor, Pennsylvania.
    (b) Operation and Maintenance Costs.--All operation and maintenance 
costs associated with the facility constructed under this section shall 
be the responsibility of the lessee of the marina complex at Seven 
Points' Harbor.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $850,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 562. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA.

    Section 566(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3786) is amended by inserting ``environmental restoration,'' 
after ``water supply and related facilities,''.

SEC. 563. UPPER SUSQUEHANNA-LACKAWANNA WATERSHED RESTORATION 
              INITIATIVE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with appropriate 
Federal, State, and local agencies and nongovernmental institutions, is 
authorized to prepare a watershed plan for the Upper Susquehanna-
Lackawanna Watershed (USGS Cataloguing Unit 02050107). The plan shall 
utilize geographic information system and shall include a comprehensive 
environmental assessment of the watershed's ecosystem, a comprehensive 
flood plain management plan, a flood plain protection plan, water 
resource and environmental restoration projects, water quality 
improvement, and other appropriate infrastructure and measures.
    (b) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
preparation of the plan under this section shall be 50 percent. 
Services and materials instead of cash may be credited toward the non-
Federal share of the cost of the plan.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000 for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 1999.

 SEC. 564. AGUADILLA HARBOR, PUERTO RICO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine if erosion and 
additional storm damage risks that exist in the vicinity of Aguadilla 
Harbor, Puerto Rico, are the result of a Federal navigation project. If 
the Secretary determines that such erosion and additional storm damage 
risks are the result of the project, the Secretary shall take 
appropriate measures to mitigate the erosion and storm damage.

SEC. 565. OAHE DAM TO LAKE SHARPE, SOUTH DAKOTA, STUDY.

    Section 441 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3747) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a) Investigation.--'' before ``The 
        Secretary''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Report.--Not later than September 30, 2000, the Secretary 
shall transmit to Congress a report on the results of the investigation 
under this section. The report shall include the examination of 
financing options for regular maintenance and preservation of the lake. 
The report shall be prepared in coordination and cooperation with the 
Natural Resources Conservation Service, other Federal agencies, and 
State and local officials.''.

SEC. 566. INTEGRATED WATER MANAGEMENT PLANNING, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with other Federal 
agencies and the State of Texas, shall provide technical, planning, and 
design assistance to non-Federal interests in developing integrated 
water management plans and projects that will serve the cities, 
counties, water agencies, and participating planning regions under the 
jurisdiction of the State of Texas.
    (b) Purposes of Assistance.--Assistance provided under subsection 
(a) shall be in support of non-Federal planning and projects for the 
following purposes:
            (1) Plan and develop integrated, near- and long-term water 
        management plans that address the planning region's water 
        supply, water conservation, and water quality needs.
            (2) Study and develop strategies and plans that restore, 
        preserve, and protect the State's and planning region's natural 
        ecosystems.
            (3) Facilitate public communication and participation.
            (4) Integrate such activities with other ongoing Federal 
        and State projects and activities associated with the State of 
        Texas water plan and the State of Texas legislation.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--The non-Federal share of the cost of assistance 
provided under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent, of which up to \1/2\ 
of the non-Federal share may be provided as in kind services.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section, $10,000,000 for the fiscal 
years beginning after September 30, 1999.

SEC. 567. BOLIVAR PENINSULA, JEFFERSON, CHAMBERS, AND GALVESTON 
              COUNTIES, TEXAS.

    (a) Shore Protection Project.--The Secretary is authorized to 
design and construct a shore protection project between the south jetty 
of the Sabine Pass Channel and the north jetty of the Galveston Harbor 
Entrance Channel in Jefferson, Chambers, and Galveston Counties, Texas, 
including beneficial use of dredged material from Federal navigation 
projects.
    (b) Applicability of Benefit-Cost Ratio Waiver Authority.--In 
evaluating and implementing the project, the Secretary shall allow the 
non-Federal interest to participate in the financing of the project in 
accordance with section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184), notwithstanding any limitation on the purpose 
of projects to which such section applies, to the extent that the 
Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying such section is 
necessary to implement the project.

SEC. 568. GALVESTON BEACH, GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS.

    The Secretary is authorized to design and construct a shore 
protection project between the Galveston South Jetty and San Luis Pass, 
Galveston County, Texas, using innovative nourishment techniques, 
including beneficial use of dredged material from Federal navigation 
projects.

SEC. 569. PACKERY CHANNEL, CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall construct a navigation and 
storm protection project at Packery Channel, Mustang Island, Texas, 
consisting of construction of a channel and a channel jetty and 
placement of sand along the length of the seawall.
    (b) Ecological and Recreational Benefits.--In evaluating the 
project, the Secretary shall include the ecological and recreational 
benefits of reopening the Packery Channel.
    (c) Applicability of Benefit-Cost Ratio Waiver Authority.--In 
evaluating and implementing the project, the Secretary shall allow the 
non-Federal interest to participate in the financing of the project in 
accordance with section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184), notwithstanding any limitation on the purpose 
of projects to which such section applies, to the extent that the 
Secretary's evaluation indicates that applying such section is 
necessary to implement the project.

SEC. 570. NORTHERN WEST VIRGINIA.

    The projects described in the following reports are authorized to 
be carried out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with the 
plans, and subject to the conditions, recommended in such reports:
            (1) Parkersburg, west virginia.--Report of the Corps of 
        Engineers entitled ``Parkersburg/Vienna Riverfront Park 
        Feasibility Study'', dated June 1998, at a total cost of 
        $8,400,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $4,200,000, and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $4,200,000.
            (2) Weirton, west virginia.--Report of the Corps of 
        Engineers entitled ``Feasibility Master Plan for Weirton Port 
        and Industrial Center, West Virginia Public Port Authority'', 
        dated December 1997, at a total cost of $18,000,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $9,000,000, and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $9,000,000.
            (3) Erickson/wood county, west virginia.--Report of the 
        Corps of Engineers entitled ``Feasibility Master Plan for 
        Erickson/Wood County Port District, West Virginia Public Port 
        Authority'', dated July 7, 1997, at a total cost of 
        $28,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $14,000,000, and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $14,000,000.
            (4) Monongahela river, west virginia.--Monongahela River, 
        West Virginia, Comprehensive Study Reconnaissance Report, dated 
        September 1995, consisting of the following elements:
                    (A) Morgantown Riverfront Park, Morgantown, West 
                Virginia, at a total cost of $1,600,000, with an 
                estimated Federal cost of $800,000 and an estimated 
                non-Federal cost of $800,000.
                    (B) Caperton Rail to Trail, Monongahela County, 
                West Virginia, at a total cost of $4,425,000, with an 
                estimated Federal cost of $2,212,500 and an estimated 
                non-Federal cost of $2,212,500.
                    (C) Palatine Park, Fairmont, West Virginia, at a 
                total cost of $1,750,000, with an estimated Federal 
                cost of $875,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
                $875,000.

SEC. 571. URBANIZED PEAK FLOOD MANAGEMENT RESEARCH.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall develop and implement a 
research program to evaluate opportunities to manage peak flood flows 
in urbanized watersheds located in the State of New Jersey.
    (b) Scope of Research.--The research program authorized by 
subsection (a) shall be accomplished through the New York District. The 
research shall specifically include the following:
            (1) Identification of key factors in urbanized watersheds 
        that are under development and impact peak flows in the 
        watersheds and downsteam of the watersheds.
            (2) Development of peak flow management models for 4 to 6 
        watersheds in urbanized areas located with widely differing 
        geology, areas, shapes, and soil types that can be used to 
        determine optimal flow reduction factors for individual 
        watersheds.
            (3) Utilization of such management models to determine 
        relationships between flow and reduction factors and change in 
        imperviousness, soil types, shape of the drainage basin, and 
        other pertinent parameters from existing to ultimate conditions 
        in watersheds under consideration for development.
            (4) Development and validation of an inexpensive accurate 
        model to establish flood reduction factors based on runoff 
        curve numbers, change in imperviousness, the shape of the 
        basin, and other pertinent factors.
    (c) Report to Congress.--The Secretary shall evaluate policy 
changes in the planning process for flood control projects based on the 
results of the research authorized by this section and transmit to 
Congress a report not later than 3 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carryout this section $3,000,000 for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 1999.
    (e) Flow Reduction Factors Defined.--In this section, the term 
``flow reduction factors'' means the ratio of estimated allowable peak 
flows of stormwater after projected development when compared to pre-
existing conditions.

SEC. 572. MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION.

    Section 8 of the Flood Control Act of May 15, 1928 (Public Law 391, 
70th Congress), is amended by striking ``$7,500'' and inserting 
``$21,500.''

SEC. 573. COASTAL AQUATIC HABITAT MANAGEMENT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may cooperate with the Secretaries 
of Agriculture and the Interior, the Administrators of the 
Environmental Protection Agency and the National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration, other appropriate Federal, State, and local 
agencies, and affected private entities, in the development of a 
management strategy to address problems associated with toxic 
microorganisms and the resulting degradation of ecosystems in the tidal 
and nontidal wetlands and waters of the United States for the States 
along the Atlantic Ocean. As part of such management strategy, the 
Secretary may provide planning, design, and other technical assistance 
to each participating State in the development and implementation of 
nonregulatory measures to mitigate environmental problems and restore 
aquatic resources.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--The Federal share of the cost of measures 
undertaken under this section shall not exceed 65 percent.
    (c) Operation and Maintenance.--The non-Federal share of operation 
and maintenance costs for projects constructed with assistance provided 
under this section shall be 100 percent.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriation.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $7,000,000 for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 1999.

SEC. 574. RECREATION USER FEES INITIATIVE.

    (a) In General.--During fiscal years 2000 through 2003, the 
Secretary may withhold from the special account established pursuant to 
section 4(i)(1)(A) of the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act of 1965 
(16 U.S.C. 460l-6a(i)(1)(A)), 100 percent of the amount of receipts 
from fees collected at selected recreation sites under the 
administrative jurisdiction of the Department of the Army pursuant to 
section 4(b) of such Act (16 U.S.C. 460l-6a(b)). The amounts withheld 
shall be retained by the Secretary and shall be available for 
expenditure by the Secretary in accordance with the provisions of this 
section.
    (b) Use of Funds.--In order to increase the quality of the visitor 
experience at public recreational areas and to enhance the protection 
of resources, the amounts withheld pursuant to subsection (a) and 
available for expenditure may only be used for backlogged repair and 
maintenance projects (including projects relating to public health and 
safety) and for interpretation, signage, habitat or facility 
enhancement, resource preservation, annual operation and maintenance, 
and law enforcement related to public use.
    (c) Applicability.--The Secretary shall implement the authority 
under this section and evaluate the feasibility of retaining recreation 
fees at projects and facilities under the Secretary's jurisdiction at 
not more than 5 projects and facilities. In selecting projects and 
facilities under this section, the Secretary should seek to achieve 
geographic diversity. One of the projects and facilities selected shall 
be the Mississippi River Headwaters Recreation Areas, Minnesota.
    (d) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2003, the Secretary shall 
transmit to Congress a report on the results of implementing this 
section, together with recommendations concerning whether the authority 
under this section should be offered on a nationwide basis.

SEC. 575. ABANDONED AND INACTIVE NONCOAL MINE RESTORATION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to provide technical, 
planning, and design assistance to Federal and non-Federal interests 
for carrying out projects to address water quality problems caused by 
drainage and related activities from abandoned and inactive noncoal 
mines.
    (b) Specific Measures.--Assistance provided under subsection (a) 
may be in support of projects for the following purposes:
            (1) Management of drainage from abandoned and inactive 
        noncoal mines.
            (2) Restoration and protection of streams, rivers, 
        wetlands, other waterbodies, and riparian areas degraded by 
        drainage from abandoned and inactive noncoal mines.
            (3) Demonstration of management practices and innovative 
        and alternative treatment technologies to minimize or eliminate 
        adverse environmental effects associated with drainage from 
        abandoned and inactive noncoal mines.
    (c) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
assistance under subsection (a) shall be 50 percent; except that the 
Federal share with respect to projects located on lands owned by the 
United States shall be 100 percent.
    (d) Effect on Authority of the Secretary of the Interior.--Nothing 
in this section shall be construed as affecting the authority of the 
Secretary of the Interior under title IV of the Surface Mining Control 
and Reclamation Act of 1977 (30 U.S.C. 1231 et seq.).
    (e) Technology Database for Reclamation of Abandoned Mines.--The 
Secretary is authorized to provide assistance to non-Federal and non-
profit entities to develop, manage, and maintain a database of 
conventional and innovative, cost-effective technologies for 
reclamation of abandoned and inactive noncoal mine sites. Such 
assistance shall be provided through the rehabilitation of abandoned 
mine sites program, managed by the Sacramento District Office of the 
Corps of Engineers.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000.

SEC. 576. BENEFICIAL USE OF WASTE TIRE RUBBER.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to conduct pilot 
projects to encourage the beneficial use of waste tire rubber, 
including crumb rubber, recycled from tires. Such beneficial use may 
include marine pilings, underwater framing, floating docks with built-
in flotation, utility poles, and other uses associated with 
transportation and infrastructure projects receiving Federal funds. The 
Secretary shall, when appropriate, encourage the use of waste tire 
rubber, including crumb rubber, in such federally funded projects.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000 for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 1998.

SEC. 577. SITE DESIGNATION.

    Section 102(c)(4) of the Marine Protection, Research, and 
Sanctuaries Act of 1972 (33 U.S.C. 1412(c)(4)) is amended by striking 
``January 1, 2000'' and inserting ``January 1, 2005''.

SEC. 578. LAND CONVEYANCES.

    (a) Exchange of Land in Pike County, Missouri.--
            (1) Exchange of land.--Subject to paragraphs (3) and (4), 
        at such time as Holnam Inc. conveys all right, title, and 
        interest in and to the land described in paragraph (2)(A) to 
        the United States, the Secretary shall convey all right, title, 
        and interest in the land described in paragraph (2)(B) to 
        Holnam Inc.
            (2) Description of lands.--The lands referred to in 
        paragraph (1) are the following:
                    (A) Non-federal land.--152.45 acres with existing 
                flowage easements situated in Pike County, Missouri, 
                described a portion of Government Tract Number FM-9 and 
                all of Government Tract Numbers FM-11, FM-10, FM-12, 
                FM-13, and FM-16, owned and administered by the Holnam 
                Inc.
                    (B) Federal land.--152.61 acres situated in Pike 
                County, Missouri, known as Government Tract Numbers FM-
                17 and a portion of FM-18, administered by the Corps of 
                Engineers.
            (3) Conditions of exchange.--The exchange of land 
        authorized by paragraph (1) shall be subject to the following 
        conditions:
                    (A) Deeds.--
                            (i) Federal land.--The instrument of 
                        conveyance used to convey the land described in 
                        paragraph (2)(B) to Holnam Inc. shall contain 
                        such reservations, terms, and conditions as the 
                        Secretary considers necessary to allow the 
                        United States to operate and maintain the 
                        Mississippi River 9-Foot Navigation Project.
                            (ii) Non-federal land.--The conveyance of 
                        the land described in paragraph (2)(A) to the 
                        Secretary shall be by a warranty deed 
                        acceptable to the Secretary.
                    (B) Removal of improvements.--Holnam Inc. may 
                remove any improvements on the land described in 
                paragraph (2)(A). The Secretary may require Holnam Inc. 
                to remove any improvements on the land described in 
                paragraph (2)(A). In either case, Holnam Inc. shall 
                hold the United States harmless from liability, and the 
                United States shall not incur cost associated with the 
                removal or relocation of any such improvements.
                    (C) Time limit for exchange.--The land exchange 
                authorized by paragraph (1) shall be completed not 
                later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this 
                Act.
                    (D) Legal description.--The Secretary shall provide 
                the legal description of the land described in 
                paragraph (2). The legal description shall be used in 
                the instruments of conveyance of the land.
                    (E) Administrative costs.--The Secretary shall 
                require Holnam Inc. to pay reasonable administrative 
                costs associated with the exchange.
            (4) Value of properties.--If the appraised fair market 
        value, as determined by the Secretary, of the land conveyed to 
        Holnam Inc. by the Secretary under paragraph (1) exceeds the 
        appraised fair market value, as determined by the Secretary, of 
        the land conveyed to the United States by Holnam Inc. under 
        paragraph (1), Holnam Inc. shall make a payment equal to the 
        excess in cash or a cash equivalent to the United States.
    (b) Candy Lake Project, Osage County, Oklahoma.--
            (1) Definitions.--In this subsection, the following 
        definitions apply:
                    (A) Fair market value.--The term ``fair market 
                value'' means the amount for which a willing buyer 
                would purchase and a willing seller would sell a parcel 
                of land, as determined by a qualified, independent land 
                appraiser.
                    (B) Previous owner of land.--The term ``previous 
                owner of land'' means a person (including a 
                corporation) that conveyed, or a descendant of a 
                deceased individual who conveyed, land to the Corps of 
                Engineers for use in the Candy Lake project in Osage 
                County, Oklahoma.
            (2) Land conveyances.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary shall convey, in 
                accordance with this subsection, all right, title, and 
                interest of the United States in and to the land 
                acquired by the United States for the Candy Lake 
                project in Osage County, Oklahoma.
                    (B) Previous owners of land.--
                            (i) In general.--The Secretary shall give a 
                        previous owner of land the first option to 
                        purchase the land described in subparagraph 
                        (A).
                            (ii) Application.--
                                    (I) In general.--A previous owner 
                                of land that desires to purchase the 
                                land described in subparagraph (A) that 
                                was owned by the previous owner of 
                                land, or by the individual from whom 
                                the previous owner of land is 
                                descended, shall file an application to 
                                purchase the land with the Secretary 
                                not later than 180 days after the 
                                official date of notice to the previous 
                                owner of land under paragraph (3).
                                    (II) First to file has first 
                                option.--If more than 1 application is 
                                filed to purchase a parcel of land 
                                described in subparagraph (A), the 
                                first option to purchase the parcel of 
                                land shall be determined in the order 
                                in which applications for the parcel of 
                                land were filed.
                            (iii) Identification of previous owners of 
                        land.--As soon as practicable after the date of 
                        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall, to 
                        the extent practicable, identify each previous 
                        owner of land.
                            (iv) Consideration.--Consideration for land 
                        conveyed under this paragraph shall be the fair 
                        market value of the land.
                    (C) Disposal.--Any land described in subparagraph 
                (A) for which an application to purchase the land has 
                not been filed under subparagraph (B)(ii) within the 
                applicable time period shall be disposed of in 
                accordance with law.
                    (D) Extinguishment of easements.--All flowage 
                easements acquired by the United States for use in the 
                Candy Lake project in Osage County, Oklahoma, are 
                extinguished.
            (3) Notice.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary shall notify--
                            (i) each person identified as a previous 
                        owner of land under paragraph (2)(B)(iii), not 
                        later than 90 days after identification, by 
                        United States mail; and
                            (ii) the general public, not later than 90 
                        days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
                        by publication in the Federal Register.
                    (B) Contents of notice.--Notice under this 
                paragraph shall include--
                            (i) a copy of this subsection;
                            (ii) information sufficient to separately 
                        identify each parcel of land subject to this 
                        subsection; and
                            (iii) specification of the fair market 
                        value of each parcel of land subject to this 
                        subsection.
                    (C) Official date of notice.--The official date of 
                notice under this paragraph shall be the later of--
                            (i) the date on which actual notice is 
                        mailed; or
                            (ii) the date of publication of the notice 
                        in the Federal Register.
    (c) Lake Hugo, Oklahoma, Area Land Conveyance.--
            (1) In general.--As soon as practicable after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall convey at fair 
        market value to Choctaw County Industrial Authority, Oklahoma, 
        the property described in paragraph (2).
            (2) Description.--The property to be conveyed under 
        paragraph (1) is--
                    (A) that portion of land at Lake Hugo, Oklahoma, 
                above elevation 445.2 located in the N\1/2\ of the 
                NW\1/4\ of Section 24, R 18 E, T 6 S, and the S\1/2\ of 
                the SW\1/4\ of Section 13, R 18 E, T 6 S bounded to the 
                south by a line 50 north on the centerline of Road B of 
                Sawyer Bluff Public Use Area and to the north by the 
                \1/2\ quarter section line forming the south boundary 
                of Wilson Point Public Use Area; and
                    (B) a parcel of property at Lake Hugo, Oklahoma, 
                commencing at the NE corner of the SE\1/4\ SW\1/4\ of 
                Section 13, R 18 E, T 6 S, 100 feet north, then east 
                approximately \1/2\ mile to the county line road 
                between Section 13, R 18 E, T 6 S, and Section 18, R 19 
                E, T 6 S.
            (3) Terms and conditions.--The conveyances under this 
        subsection shall be subject to such terms and conditions, 
        including payment of reasonable administrative costs and 
        compliance with applicable Federal floodplain management and 
        flood insurance programs, as the Secretary considers necessary 
        and appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.
    (d) Conveyance of Property in Marshall County, Oklahoma.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the State of 
        Oklahoma all right, title, and interest of the United States to 
        real property located in Marshall County, Oklahoma, and 
        included in the Lake Texoma (Denison Dam), Oklahoma and Texas, 
        project consisting of approximately 1,580 acres and leased to 
        the State of Oklahoma for public park and recreation purposes.
            (2) Consideration.--Consideration for the conveyance under 
        paragraph (1) shall be the fair market value of the real 
        property, as determined by the Secretary. All costs associated 
        with the conveyance under paragraph (1) shall be paid by the 
        State of Oklahoma.
            (3) Description.--The exact acreage and legal description 
        of the real property to be conveyed under paragraph (1) shall 
        be determined by a survey satisfactory to the Secretary. The 
        cost of the survey shall be paid by the State of Oklahoma.
            (4) Environmental compliance.--Before making the conveyance 
        under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall--
                    (A) conduct an environmental baseline survey to 
                determine if there are levels of contamination for 
                which the United States would be responsible under the 
                Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 
                Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.); and
                    (B) ensure that the conveyance complies with the 
                National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 
                4321 et seq.).
            (5) Other terms and conditions.--The conveyance under 
        paragraph (1) shall be subject to such other terms and 
        conditions as the Secretary considers necessary and appropriate 
        to protect the interests of the United States, including 
        reservation by the United States of a flowage easement over all 
        portions of the real property to be conveyed that are at or 
        below elevation 645.0 NGVD.
    (e) Summerfield Cemetery Association, Oklahoma, Land Conveyance.--
            (1) In general.--As soon as practicable after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transfer to the 
        Summerfield Cemetery Association, Oklahoma, all right, title, 
        and interest of the United State in and to the land described 
        in paragraph (3) for use as a cemetery.
            (2) Reversion.--If the land to be transferred under this 
        subsection ever cease to be used as a not-for-profit cemetery 
        or for other public purposes the land shall revert to the 
        United States.
            (3) Description.--The land to be conveyed under this 
        subsection is the approximately 10 acres of land located in 
        Leflore County, Oklahoma, and described as follows:

                         indian basin meridian

              Section 23, Township 5 North, Range 23 East

    SW SE SW NW
    NW NE NW SW
    N\1/2\ SW SW NW.
            (4) Consideration.--The conveyance under this subsection 
        shall be without consideration. All costs associated with the 
        conveyance shall be paid by the Summerfield Cemetery 
        Association, Oklahoma.
            (5) Other terms and conditions.--The conveyance under this 
        subsection shall be subject to such other terms and conditions 
        as the Secretary considers necessary and appropriate to protect 
        the interests of the United States.
    (f) Dexter, Oregon.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the Dexter 
        Sanitary District all right, title, and interest of the United 
        States in and to a parcel of land consisting of approximately 5 
        acres located at Dexter Lake, Oregon, under lease to the Dexter 
        Sanitary District.
            (2) Consideration.--Land to be conveyed under this section 
        shall be conveyed without consideration. If the land is no 
        longer held in public ownership or no longer used for 
        wastewater treatment purposes, title to the land shall revert 
        to the Secretary.
            (3) Terms and conditions.--The conveyance by the United 
        States shall be subject to such terms and conditions as the 
        Secretary considers appropriate to protect the interests of the 
        United States.
            (4) Description.--The exact acreage and description of the 
        land to be conveyed under paragraph (1) shall be determined by 
        such surveys as the Secretary considers necessary. The cost of 
        the surveys shall be borne by the Dexter Sanitary District.
    (g) Richard B. Russell Dam and Lake, South Carolina.--
            (1) In general.--Upon execution of an agreement under 
        paragraph (4) and subject to the requirements of this 
        subsection, the Secretary shall convey, without consideration, 
        to the State of South Carolina all right, title, and interest 
        of the United States to the lands described in paragraph (2) 
        that are managed, as of the date of enactment of this Act, by 
        the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources for fish and 
        wildlife mitigation purposes in connection with the Richard B. 
        Russell Dam and Lake, South Carolina, project.
            (2) Description.--
                    (A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B), the 
                lands to be conveyed under paragraph (1) are described 
                in Exhibits A, F, and H of Army Lease Number DACW21-1-
                93-0910 and associated Supplemental Agreements or are 
                designated in red in Exhibit A of Army License Number 
                DACW21-3-85-1904; except that all designated lands in 
                the license that are below elevation 346 feet mean sea 
                level or that are less than 300 feet measured 
                horizontally from the top of the power pool are 
                excluded from the conveyance. Management of the 
                excluded lands shall continue in accordance with the 
                terms of Army License Number DACW21-3-85-1904 until the 
                Secretary and the State enter into an agreement under 
                paragraph (4).
                    (B) Survey.--The exact acreage and legal 
                description of the lands to be conveyed under paragraph 
                (1) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory to the 
                Secretary, with the cost of the survey to be paid by 
                the State. The State shall be responsible for all other 
                costs, including real estate transaction and 
                environmental compliance costs, associated with the 
                conveyance.
            (3) Terms and conditions.--
                    (A) Management of lands.--All lands that are 
                conveyed under paragraph (1) shall be retained in 
                public ownership and shall be managed in perpetuity for 
                fish and wildlife mitigation purposes in accordance 
                with a plan approved by the Secretary. If the lands are 
                not managed for such purposes in accordance with the 
                plan, title to the lands shall revert to the United 
                States. If the lands revert to the United States under 
                this subparagraph, the Secretary shall manage the lands 
                for such purposes.
                    (B) Terms and conditions.--The Secretary may 
                require such additional terms and conditions in 
                connection with the conveyance as the Secretary 
                considers appropriate to protect the interests of the 
                United States.
            (4) Payments.--
                    (A) Agreements.--The Secretary is authorized to pay 
                to the State of South Carolina not more than $4,850,000 
                if the Secretary and the State enter into a binding 
                agreement for the State to manage for fish and wildlife 
                mitigation purposes, in perpetuity, the lands conveyed 
                under this subsection and the lands not covered by the 
                conveyance that are designated in red in Exhibit A of 
                Army License Number DACW21-3-85-1904.
                    (B) Terms and conditions.--The agreement shall 
                specify the terms and conditions under which the 
                payment will be made and the rights of, and remedies 
                available to, the Federal Government to recover all or 
                a portion of the payment in the event the State fails 
                to manage the lands in a manner satisfactory to the 
                Secretary.
    (h) Charleston, South Carolina.--The Secretary is authorized to 
convey the property of the Corps of Engineers known as the ``Equipment 
and Storage Yard'', located on Meeting Street in Charleston, South 
Carolina, in as-is condition for fair-market value with all proceeds 
from the conveyance to be applied by the Corps of Engineers, Charleston 
District, to offset a portion of the costs of moving or leasing (or 
both) an office facility in the city of Charleston.
    (i) Clarkston, Washington.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the Port of 
        Clarkston, Washington, all right, title, and interest of the 
        United States in and to a portion of the land described in Army 
        Lease Number DACW68-1-97-22, consisting of approximately 31 
        acres, the exact boundaries of which shall be determined by the 
        Secretary and the Port of Clarkston.
            (2) Additional land.--The Secretary may convey to the Port 
        of Clarkston, Washington, at fair market value as determined by 
        the Secretary, such additional land located in the vicinity of 
        Clarkston, Washington, as the Secretary determines to be excess 
        to the needs of the Columbia River Project and appropriate for 
        conveyance.
            (3) Terms and conditions.--The conveyances made under 
        paragraphs (1) and (2) shall be subject to such terms and 
        conditions as the Secretary determines to be necessary to 
        protect the interests of the United States, including a 
        requirement that the Port of Clarkston pay all administrative 
        costs associated with the conveyances (including the cost of 
        land surveys and appraisals and costs associated with 
        compliance with applicable environmental laws, including 
        regulations).
            (4) Use of land.--The Port of Clarkston shall be required 
        to pay the fair market value, as determined by the Secretary, 
        of any land conveyed pursuant to paragraph (1) that is not 
        retained in public ownership or is used for other than public 
        park or recreation purposes, except that the Secretary shall 
        have a right of reverter to reclaim possession and title to any 
        such land.
    (j) Land Conveyance to Matewan, West Virginia.--
            (1) In general.--The United States shall convey by quit 
        claim deed to the Town of Matewan, West Virginia, all right, 
        title, and interest of the United States in and to four parcels 
        of land deemed excess by the Secretary of the Army, acting 
        through the Chief of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, to the 
        structural project for flood control constructed by the Corps 
        of Engineers along the Tug Fork River pursuant to section 202 
        of Public Law 96-367.
            (2) Property description.--The parcels of land referred to 
        in paragraph (1) are as follows:
                    (A) A certain parcel of land in the State of West 
                Virginia, Mingo County, Town of Matewan, and being more 
                particularly bounded and described as follows:
                            Beginning at a point on the southerly 
                        right-of-way line of a 40-foot-wide street 
                        right-of-way (known as McCoy Alley), having an 
                        approximate coordinate value of N228,695, 
                        E1,662,397, in the line common to the land 
                        designated as U.S.A. Tract No. 834, and the 
                        land designated as U.S.A. Tract No. 837, said 
                        point being South 51 deg.52' East 81.8 feet 
                        from an iron pin and cap marked M-12 on the 
                        boundary of the Matewan Area Structural 
                        Project, on the north right-of-way line of said 
                        street, at a corner common to designated U.S.A. 
                        Tracts Nos. 834 and 836; thence, leaving the 
                        right-of-way of said street, with the line 
                        common to the land of said Tract No. 834, and 
                        the land of said Tract No. 837.
                            South 14 deg.37' West 46 feet to the corner 
                        common to the land of said Tract No. 834, and 
                        the land of said Tract No. 837; thence, leaving 
                        the land of said Tract No. 837, severing the 
                        lands of said Project.
                            South 14 deg.37' West 46 feet.
                            South 68 deg.07' East 239 feet.
                            North 26 deg.05' East 95 feet to a point on 
                        the southerly right-of-way line of said street; 
                        thence, with the right-of-way of said street, 
                        continuing to sever the lands of said Project.
                            South 63 deg.55' East 206 feet; thence, 
                        leaving the right-of-way of said street, 
                        continuing to sever the lands of said Project.
                            South 26 deg.16' West 63 feet; thence, with 
                        a curve to the left having a radius of 70 feet, 
                        a delta of 33 deg.58', an arc length of 41 
                        feet, the chord bearing.
                            South 09 deg.17' West 41 feet; thence, 
                        leaving said curve, continuing to sever the 
                        lands of said Project.
                            South 07 deg.42' East 31 feet to a point on 
                        the right-of-way line of the floodwall; thence, 
                        with the right-of-way of said floodwall, 
                        continuing to sever the lands of said Project.
                            South 77 deg.04' West 71 feet.
                            North 77 deg.10' West 46 feet.
                            North 67 deg.07' West 254 feet.
                            North 67 deg.54' West 507 feet.
                            North 57 deg.49' West 66 feet to the 
                        intersection of the right-of-way line of said 
                        floodwall with the southerly right-of-way line 
                        of said street; thence, leaving the right-of-
                        way of said floodwall and with the southerly 
                        right-of-way of said street, continuing to 
                        sever the lands of said Project.
                            North 83 deg.01' East 171 feet.
                            North 89 deg.42' East 74 feet.
                            South 83 deg.39' East 168 feet.
                            South 83 deg.38' East 41 feet.
                            South 77 deg.26' East 28 feet to the point 
                        of beginning, containing 2.59 acres, more or 
                        less. The bearings and coordinate used herein 
                        are referenced to the West Virginia State Plane 
                        Coordinate System, South Zone.
                    (B) A certain parcel of land in the State of West 
                Virginia, Mingo County, Town of Matewan, and being more 
                particularly bounded and described as follows:
                            Beginning at an iron pin and cap designated 
                        Corner No. M2-2 on the southerly right-of-way 
                        line of the Norfolk and Western Railroad, 
                        having an approximate coordinate value of 
                        N228,755 E1,661,242, and being at the 
                        intersection of the right-of-way line of the 
                        floodwall with the boundary of the Matewan Area 
                        Structural Project; thence, leaving the right-
                        of-way of said floodwall and with said Project 
                        boundary, and the southerly right-of-way of 
                        said Railroad.
                            North 59 deg.45' East 34 feet.
                            North 69 deg.50' East 44 feet.
                            North 58 deg.11' East 79 feet.
                            North 66 deg.13' East 102 feet.
                            North 69 deg.43' East 98 feet.
                            North 77 deg.39' East 18 feet.
                            North 72 deg.39' East 13 feet to a point at 
                        the intersection of said Project boundary, and 
                        the southerly right-of-way of said Railroad, 
                        with the westerly right-of-way line of State 
                        Route 49/10; thence, leaving said Project 
                        boundary, and the southerly right-of-way of 
                        said Railroad, and with the westerly right-of-
                        way of said road.
                            South 03 deg.21' East 100 feet to a point 
                        at the intersection of the westerly right-of-
                        way of said road with the right-of-way of said 
                        floodwall; thence, leaving the right-of-way of 
                        said road, and with the right-of-way line of 
                        said floodwall.
                            South 79 deg.30' West 69 feet.
                            South 78 deg.28' West 222 feet.
                            South 80 deg.11' West 65 feet.
                            North 38 deg.40' West 14 feet to the point 
                        of beginning, containing 0.53 acre, more or 
                        less. The bearings and coordinate used herein 
                        are referenced to the West Virginia State Plane 
                        Coordinate System, South Zone.
                    (C) A certain parcel of land in the State of West 
                Virginia, Mingo County, Town of Matewan, and being more 
                particularly bounded and described as follows:
                            Beginning at a point on the southerly 
                        right-of-way line of the Norfolk and Western 
                        Railroad, having an approximate coordinate 
                        value of N228,936 E1,661,672, and being at the 
                        intersection of the easterly right-of-way line 
                        of State Route 49/10 with the boundary of the 
                        Matewan Area Structural Project; thence, 
                        leaving the right-of-way of said road, and with 
                        said Project boundary, and the southerly right-
                        of-way of said Railroad.
                            North 77 deg.49' East 89 feet to an iron 
                        pin and cap designated as U.S.A. Corner No. M-
                        4.
                            North 79 deg.30' East 74 feet to an iron 
                        pin and cap designated as U.S.A. Corner No. M-
                        5-1; thence, leaving the southerly right-of-way 
                        of said Railroad, and continuing with the 
                        boundary of said Project.
                            South 06 deg.33' East 102 to an iron pipe 
                        and cap designated U.S.A. Corner No. M-6-1 on 
                        the northerly right-of-way line of State Route 
                        49/28; thence, leaving the boundary of said 
                        Project, and with the right-of-way of said 
                        road, severing the lands of said Project.
                            North 80 deg.59' West 171 feet to a point 
                        at the intersection of the Northerly right-of-
                        way line of said State Route 49/28 with the 
                        easterly right-of-way line of said State Route 
                        49/10; thence, leaving the right-of-way of said 
                        State Route 49/28 and with the right-of-way of 
                        said State Route 49/10.
                            North 03 deg.21' West 42 feet to the point 
                        of beginning, containing 0.27 acre, more or 
                        less. The bearings and coordinate used herein 
                        are referenced to the West Virginia State Plane 
                        Coordinate System, South Zone.
                    (D) A certain parcel of land in the State of West 
                Virginia, Mingo County, Town of Matewan, and being more 
                particularly bounded and described as follows:
                            Beginning at a point at the intersection of 
                        the easterly right-of-way line of State Route 
                        49/10 with the right-of-way line of the 
                        floodwall, having an approximate coordinate 
                        value of N228,826 E1,661,679; thence, leaving 
                        the right-of-way of said floodwall, and with 
                        the right-of-way of said State Route 49/10.
                            North 03 deg.21' West 23 feet to a point at 
                        the intersection of the easterly right-of-way 
                        line of said State Route 49/10 with the 
                        southerly right-of-way line of State Route 49/
                        28; thence, leaving the right-of-way of said 
                        State Route 49/10 and with the right-of-way of 
                        said State Route 49/28.
                            South 80 deg.59' East 168 feet.
                            North 82 deg.28' East 45 feet to an iron 
                        pin and cap designated as U.S.A. Corner No. M-
                        8-1 on the boundary of the Western Area 
                        Structural Project; thence, leaving the right-
                        of-way of said State Route 49/28, and with said 
                        Project boundary.
                            South 08 deg.28' East 88 feet to an iron 
                        pin and cap designated as U.S.A. Corner No. M-
                        9-1 point on the northerly right-of-way line of 
                        a street (known as McCoy Alley); thence, 
                        leaving said Project boundary and with the 
                        northerly right-of-way of said street.
                            South 83 deg.01' West 38 feet to a point on 
                        the right-of-way line of said floodwall; 
                        thence, leaving the right-of-way of said 
                        street, and with the right-of-way of said 
                        floodwall.
                            North 57 deg.49' West 180 feet.
                            South 79 deg.30' West 34 feet to a point of 
                        beginning, containing 0.24 acre, more or less. 
                        The bearings and coordinate used herein are 
                        referenced to the West Virginia State Plane 
                        Coordinate System, South Zone.

SEC. 579. NAMINGS.

    (a) Francis Bland Floodway Ditch, Arkansas.--
            (1) Designation.--8-Mile Creek in Paragould, Arkansas, 
        shall be known and designated as the ``Francis Bland Floodway 
        Ditch''.
            (2) Legal reference.--Any reference in a law, map, 
        regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
        States to the creek referred to in paragraph (1) shall be 
        deemed to be a reference to the ``Francis Bland Floodway 
        Ditch''.
    (b) Lawrence Blackwell Memorial Bridge, Arkansas.--
            (1) Designation.--The bridge over lock and dam numbered 4 
        on the Arkansas River, Arkansas, constructed as part of the 
        project for navigation on the Arkansas River and tributaries, 
        shall be known and designated as the ``Lawrence Blackwell 
        Memorial Bridge''.
            (2) Legal reference.--Any reference in a law, map, 
        regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 
        States to the bridge referred to in paragraph (1) shall be 
        deemed to be a reference to the ``Lawrence Blackwell Memorial 
        Bridge''.

SEC. 580. FOLSOM DAM AND RESERVOIR ADDITIONAL STORAGE AND WATER SUPPLY 
              STUDIES.

    (a) Folsom Flood Control Studies.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
        State of California and local water resources agencies, shall 
        undertake a study of increasing surcharge flood control storage 
        at the Folsom Dam and Reservoir by replacing the 8 spillway 
        gates and raising the dam and embankment by 6.5 feet or the 
        amount needed to achieve a 140-year level of flood protection, 
        whichever provides the greater level of flood protection.
            (2) Determination of 140-year level of flood protection.--
        For the purposes of paragraph (1), the 140-year level of flood 
        protection shall be determined in accordance with the hydrology 
        approved by the Sacramento District of the United States Army 
        Corps of Engineers in its February 3, 1998, report entitled 
        ``American River, California, Rain Flood Flow Frequency 
        Analysis''.
            (3) Limitations.--The modifications to the Folsom Dam and 
        Reservoir under this section may not increase the conservation 
        storage of the Folsom Reservoir.
            (4) Report.--Not later than April 15, 2001, the Secretary 
        shall transmit to Congress a report on the results of the study 
        under this subsection.
    (b) Folsom Water Supply Studies.--
            (1) In general.--Following the completion of the study 
        under subsection (a), the Secretary of the Interior, in 
        consultation with the Secretary of the Army, the State of 
        California, local water resources agencies, local elected 
        officials and interested organizations, shall undertake a study 
        of the opportunities to increase the available water supply 
        storage at Folsom Dam and Reservoir resulting from any flood 
        control modifications to Folsom Dam recommended under 
        subsection (a).
            (2) Focus of study.--The study shall focus on opportunities 
        to increase water supply storage that can be accomplished while 
        at the same time protecting private property and recreational 
        values at Folsom Reservoir.
    (c) Implementation.--Upon completion of the study undertaken 
pursuant to subsection (a), the Secretary shall proceed with the 
implementation of the maximum amount of surcharge flood control storage 
which meets the criteria identified in subsection (a) if the Secretary 
determines that the project--
            (1) is technically feasible, environmentally acceptable, 
        and economically justified and in accordance with the economic 
        and environmental principles and guidelines for water and land 
        resources; and
            (2) includes measures which, to the maximum extent 
        practicable, mitigate any adverse impacts to private property 
        and recreation at Folsom Reservoir.
    (d) Road Relocations.--
            (1) Planning and design.--Upon enactment of this Act, the 
        Secretary shall undertake detailed planning and design of 
        alternative transportation improvements, including a bridge 
        downstream of Folsom Dam, that comply with current 
        transportation design criteria to replace the Folsom Dam Road, 
        which is currently on top of the embankment at Folsom Dam.
            (2) Construction.--Subsequent to the Secretary's 
        determination to proceed with implementation of additional 
        storage at Folsom Dam under subsection (a) and prior to 
        construction of improvements to Folsom Dam needed for such 
        implementation, the Secretary, in consultation with the city of 
        Folsom and the Bureau of Reclamation, shall construct the 
        transportation improvements designed under paragraph (1).
            (3) Cost sharing.--The cost of planning, design, and 
        construction of transportation improvements under this 
        subsection shall be treated as safety modifications and shall 
        be subject to cost sharing in accordance with section 1203 of 
        the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 467n). 
        All costs attributed to water and power users of the Central 
        Valley Project for such planning, design, and construction 
        shall be a Federal responsibility and shall be nonreimbursable.
            (4) Special rule for cost-benefit analysis.--For purposes 
        of evaluating the costs and benefits of the transportation 
        improvements authorized by this subsection, the benefits of 
        such improvements shall be allocated to ensuring adequate 
        safety at Folsom Dam and shall be deemed to equal the cost of 
        such improvements.

SEC. 581. WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT.

    (a) Placer County Water Agency.--
            (1) Contract clarification.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary of the Interior 
                shall amend Contract No. 14-06-200-5082A between the 
                Bureau of Reclamation and the Placer County Water 
                Agency for the sole purposes of--
                            (i) adding in accordance with California 
                        State water law a point of diversion on the 
                        Sacramento River for the diversion of water 
                        pursuant to the contract;
                            (ii) modifying the contract to charge the 
                        Placer County Water Agency only for water 
                        actually delivered after December 31, 1997; and
                            (iii) reaffirming the obligation of the 
                        Bureau of Reclamation to make available to the 
                        Placer County Water Agency up to 117,000 acre-
                        feet of water on the build-up schedule set 
                        forth in such contract.
                    (B) Delivery of water.--Upon amendment of the 
                contract under subparagraph (A), the Secretary of the 
                Interior shall deliver water pursuant to the contract 
                either from the Sacramento River or from the American 
                River with the determination of which diversion or 
                combination of diversions to be utilized at any given 
                time or in any year to be made upon an operational 
                determination based, first, on minimizing any 
                environmental harm associated with the diversion of 
                water under such contract and, second, on reducing or 
                moderating adverse effects on Central Valley Project 
                contractors below the Delta and shall, in addition, 
                reduce to insignificance the water supply impact, if 
                any, to water users in the Sacramento River watershed, 
                including Central Valley Project contractors.
                    (C) Limitation.--The Secretary of the Interior 
                shall only deliver, pursuant to the contract amended 
                under subparagraph (A), in any year, that amount of 
                water actually needed by Placer County Water Agency for 
                use in its service area after--
                            (i) considering all other sources of water 
                        available to the Agency;
                            (ii) implementation of water conservation; 
                        and
                            (iii) to the extent feasible, 
                        implementation of programs to maximize 
                        conjunctive use of surface and groundwater.
                    (D) Cooperation.--The Secretary of the Interior is 
                further authorized to work cooperatively with other 
                entities who operate water storage facilities on the 
                Sacramento and American Rivers and their tributaries to 
                provide as much of the water needed to be delivered 
                under the contract amended under subparagraph (A), in 
                any given year, through improved or modified voluntary 
                operation and management of the water storage 
                facilities to assist in reducing, moderating, or 
                eliminating any adverse impacts on water supply to 
                other Central Valley Project contractors.
            (2) Sacramento river diversion infrastructure.--
                    (A) Design and construction.--The Secretary of the 
                Interior shall design and construct facilities, 
                including fish screens, for--
                            (i) the diversion and transportation of up 
                        to 117,000 acre-feet of Central Valley Project, 
                        California, water set forth in Contract No. 14-
                        06-200-5082A from a location suitable to the 
                        Placer County Water Agency on the Sacramento 
                        River between the mouths of the Feather and the 
                        American Rivers to a point in western Placer 
                        County, California, not less than one mile east 
                        of the western boundary of Placer County, at a 
                        continuous rate of not less than 100 cubic feet 
                        per second;
                            (ii) the treatment of not less than 65 
                        million gallons of water per day for domestic 
                        use; and
                            (iii) the storage of not less than 20 
                        million gallons of water.
                    (B) Conveyance.--Upon completion of construction of 
                facilities under this paragraph, ownership of the 
                facilities shall be conveyed to the Placer County Water 
                Agency, together with an easement over any related 
                Federal property that provides the Agency the right to 
                access all such facilities and appurtenances for the 
                purposes of operation, maintenance, repair, 
                reconstruction or replacement or enlargement, in 
                perpetuity.
            (3) American river pump station.--
                    (A) Design and construction.--The Secretary of the 
                Interior shall design, construct, and expand existing 
                facilities or install new facilities to provide for a 
                permanent diversion intake, pumping station, electric 
                facilities, electric transmission lines, water 
                conveyance facilities access roads, and all ancillary 
                facilities necessary to allow the Placer County Water 
                Agency to divert and pump a total flow of not less than 
                200 cubic feet per second from the American River into 
                that Agency's Auburn Ravine Tunnel on a year-round 
                basis.
                    (B) Conveyance.--Upon completion of construction of 
                facilities under this paragraph, ownership of the 
                facilities shall be conveyed to the Placer County Water 
                Agency, together with an easement over any related 
                Federal property that provides the Agency, the right to 
                access all of its pump station and tunnel facilities 
                and appurtenances for the purposes of operation, 
                maintenance, repair, reconstruction or replacement 
                enlargement and relocation, in perpetuity.
            (4) Modifications to hell hole dam.--The Secretary of the 
        Interior shall design and construct gates and other facilities 
        at Hell Hole Dam and Reservoir of the Placer County Water 
        Agency in Placer County, California, sufficient to enable the 
        Agency to operate this dam and reservoir to assist in the 
        provision of flood protection for the lands and inhabitants 
        adjacent to the American River downstream of Folsom Dam.
            (5) Costs.--The total costs of design and construction 
        under this subsection is $133,000,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $86,450,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $46,550,000.
    (b) El Dorado Irrigation District.--
            (1) Folsom lake diversion.--
                    (A) Contract.--The Secretary of the Interior shall 
                enter into a municipal and industrial water supply 
                contract with the El Dorado Irrigation District, to 
                provide not to exceed 35,000 acre-feet of water 
                annually, for the purpose of diverting water from 
                Folsom Lake or exchange water upstream on the American 
                River or its tributaries.
                    (B) Cooperation.--The Secretary of the Interior 
                shall work cooperatively with the city of Sacramento, 
                the Sacramento Municipal Utility District, and other 
                entities who operate facilities on the American River 
                or elsewhere within the Central Valley Project area to 
                provide all or part of the 35,000 acre-feet of water 
                annually under subpargraph (A) through improved or 
                modified voluntary operation and management of existing 
                water storage and conveyance facilities on the American 
                River or elsewhere within the Central Valley Project 
                area, or through participation in feasible groundwater 
                banking programs that may be available, in order to 
                reduce or moderate adverse impacts to other Central 
                Valley Project contractors.
                    (C) Limitation on delivery of water.--The Secretary 
                of the Interior shall only deliver water pursuant to 
                the contract entered into under this paragraph, in any 
                year, that amount of water actually needed by the El 
                Dorado Irrigation District and Georgetown Divide Public 
                Utility District in their respective service area to be 
                determined after considering all other sources of water 
                available to the districts for this purpose, including 
                the full utilization of all other water entitlements 
                and the implementation of water conservation.
                    (D) Additional authority.--The 35,000 acre-feet of 
                water to be provided under the contract entered into 
                under this paragraph is in addition to the 15,000 acre-
                foot first phase contracting authorized under section 
                206(b)(1) of the Energy and Water Development 
                Appropriations Act, 1991 (104 Stat. 2087-2088). The 
                15,000 acre feet of water provided for in such section 
                may be consolidated into one contract with the contract 
                to provide 35,000 acre-feet of water authorized under 
                this paragraph.
            (2) Warren act contract.--Notwithstanding the provisions of 
        section 3404(a) of the Reclamation Projects Authorization and 
        Adjustment Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4708), the Secretary of the 
        Interior shall enter into contracts under the Act of February 
        21, 1911, commonly known as the ``Warren Act'' (43 U.S.C. 523 
        et seq.; 36 Stat. 925), with the El Dorado Irrigation District 
        or the El Dorado County Water Agency for the storage and 
        conveyance of qualities of water that such districts, together 
        or independently, may obtain pursuant to permit or license from 
        the State of California.
            (3) Improvements to folsom lake diversion infrastructure.--
        The Secretary of the Interior shall design and construct 
        facilities needed to retrofit the El Dorado County Irrigation 
        District's current Folsom Lake diversion infrastructure in 
        order to provide for the diversion, treatment, pumping and 
        conveyance of not to exceed 50,000 acre-feet of water annually 
        as authorized by paragraph (1) of this subsection and section 
        206(b)(1) of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations 
        Act, 1991 (104 Stat. 2087-2088).
            (4) Costs.--The total costs of design and construction 
        under paragraph (3) is $21,561,500, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $14,014,975 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $7,546,525.
    (c) Georgetown Divide Public Utility District.--
            (1) American river diversion project.--The Secretary of the 
        Interior shall design and construct facilities necessary to 
        provide for the diversion, transportation, treatment, and 
        storage of not less than 25 cubic feet per second and 7,500 
        acre-feet annually from the American River for the Georgetown 
        Divide Public Utility District to obtain benefit of the Energy 
        and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1991. Such facilities 
        shall be provided through an expansion of the capacity of the 
        Placer County Water Agency American River Pump Station 
        facilities identified in subsection (a)(3) of this section.
            (2) Land transfer.--The Secretary of the Interior shall 
        grant to the Georgetown Divide Pubic Utility District real 
        property rights sufficient to enable the Utility District to 
        implement paragraph (1).
            (3) Costs.--The total costs of design and construction 
        under this subsection is $10,000,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $6,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $3,500,000.
    (d) San Juan Water District.--The Secretary of the Interior shall 
provide, subject to advance appropriations, $1,950,000 to the San Juan 
Water District to fund 65 percent of the costs to study and identify 
alternatives that would optimize conjunctive use opportunities within 
Placer and Sacramento Counties, California, and to implement a pilot 
project necessary to analyze the technical and administrative processes 
identified through such a study.
    (e) Folsom Reservoir Diversions.--
            (1) Improvements to folsom lake diversion infrastructure.--
        The Secretary of the Interior shall design and construct 
        improvements to facilities at Folsom Dam needed to divert, 
        pump, and transport additional water from Folsom Reservoir to 
        the city of Roseville, the San Juan Water District, the city of 
        Folsom, and the Placer County Water Agency, including expansion 
        of the Industrial Pump Station.
            (2) Costs.--The total costs of design and construction 
        under this subsection is $5,000,000, with an estimated Federal 
        cost of $3,250,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
        $1,750,000.
    (f) San Joaquin County.--
            (1) Wet year water diversions.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary of the Interior 
                shall contract with San Joaquin County, California, or 
                any water agency or agencies within San Joaquin County, 
                for diversion of water at the American River Nimbus 
                diversion facility and the wheeling of water through 
                the Folsom-South Canal for the purpose of assisting in 
                the development of recharge projects within the East 
                San Joaquin County Recharge Project; except that the 
                quantity of water diverted and conveyed by and through 
                these facilities shall--
                            (i) be granted through a water rights 
                        permit or license issued by the State of 
                        California Water Resources Control Board;
                            (ii) be not greater than 500 cubic feet per 
                        second;
                            (iii) be utilized solely as part of a 
                        conjunctive use program to assist in 
                        alleviating groundwater overdraft in the 
                        eastern San Joaquin County groundwater basin in 
                        which water is only diverted to underground 
                        storage in years of water surplus; and
                            (iv) be restricted to water that is--
                                    (I) determined by the Secretary of 
                                the Interior to be nonstorable or 
                                necessary to be released for flood 
                                control; and
                                    (II) determined by the State of 
                                California Water Resources Control 
                                Board to be in excess of the rights and 
                                needs of other legal users of water 
                                from the American River, including 
                                Central Valley Project and State Water 
                                Project contractors.
                    (B) Limitations.--The conveyance of water through 
                the facilities referred to in subparagraph (A) shall 
                not reduce the quantity of water otherwise available to 
                the Central Valley Project and State Water Project. 
                Water diverted by and through such facilities shall not 
                result in any adverse affect on obligations of the 
                Secretary of the Interior to meet instream flows and 
                water quality requirements on the lower American River 
                or the Delta. No water subject to this provision shall 
                be utilized to the benefit of areas, agencies, or 
                facilities outside of San Joaquin or Sacramento 
                Counties, California.
            (2) Authorization of project loan.--
                    (A) In general.--In consultation with local 
                officials, the Secretary of the Interior shall make 
                available a 40-year Federal loan with no interest in 
                the amount of $100,000,000 to the appropriate agency or 
                agencies within San Joaquin County, California, for 
                purposes of carrying out all work required to complete 
                the project known as the East San Joaquin County 
                Recharge Project.
                    (B) Limitation.--No money authorized to be 
                appropriated to carry out this paragraph shall be made 
                available until such time as San Joaquin County, 
                California, shall have perfected water rights permits 
                or licenses from the California State Water Resources 
                Control Board sufficient to carry out the purposes of 
                the East San Joaquin County Recharge Project.
    (g) South Sacramento County.--The Secretary of the Interior shall 
make available 35,000 acre feet of water for diversion from the 
American River through the Folsom South Canal for South Sacramento 
County agriculture and water users (including the Clay Water District, 
Galt Irrigation District, and Omochumne-Hartnell Water District). Such 
diversion shall occur in years when the March through November 
unimpaired flow into Folsom Reservoir is greater than 1,600,000 acre 
feet as specified in the document entitled ``Water Forum Action Plan'', 
dated January 1999.
    (h) Water Resource Grants.--
            (1) Mitigation for diversions.--The Secretary of the 
        Interior shall provide, through grants or other cooperative 
        agreements to one or more of the Placer County Water Agency, El 
        Dorado Irrigation District, El Dorado County Water Agency, 
        Georgetown Divide Public Utility District, city of Roseville, 
        city of Folsom, San Juan Water District and its wholesale 
        suppliers, the County of Sacramento, and other agencies located 
        north of the confluence of the American and Sacramento Rivers 
        that divert or use water from the Sacramento River and its 
        tributaries, funds for the purpose of implementing projects on 
        the American River and tributaries (or, where appropriate, on 
        other rivers that are or can be operationally integrated with 
        the American River) which will provide water supply benefits to 
        municipal jurisdictions and operational and management 
        flexibility within these areas of origin in a manner that 
        reduces, moderates, or eliminates the adverse impacts of 
        diversions provided for in or facilitated by this section on 
        the Central Valley Project.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated to carry out this subsection $30,000,000.
    (i) Implementation Requirements.--
            (1) Cost effectiveness finding.--The Secretary of the 
        Interior shall carry out an activity under this section only if 
        the Secretary of the Interior determines that the activity is 
        cost effective.
            (2) Environmental compliance.--Before implementation of any 
        activity under this section, the Secretary of the Interior 
        shall comply with the provisions of the National Environmental 
        Policy Act of 1969, if applicable, with respect to such 
        activity by preparing a joint environmental impact statement 
        and environmental impact report under the California 
        Environmental Quality Act. The baseline for evaluating both 
        direct and cumulative impacts of such activity shall consider 
        the area of origin priorities granted to interests within 
        Placer, El Dorado, and Sacramento Counties, California.
            (3) Use of funds.--The Secretary of the Interior may use 
        funds appropriated to carry out this section for the 
        implementation of this subsection.
    (j) Grants and Reimbursements.--
            (1) Grants.--The Federal share of the costs of any activity 
        under this section may be provided in the form of grants to the 
        non-Federal interest or direct reimbursements to the non-
        Federal interest of such costs.
            (2) Advance construction reimbursement.--Subject to the 
        availability of appropriations, the Secretary of the Interior 
        may reimburse any non-Federal interest an amount equal to the 
        estimate of the Federal share, without interest, of the cost of 
        any work (including work associated with studies, planning, 
        design, and construction) carried out by a non-Federal interest 
        otherwise made eligible for non-Federal assistance under this 
        section. Reimbursements for construction work by a non-Federal 
        interest on an eligible project in this section may be made 
        only--
                    (A) if, before initiation of construction of the 
                project, the Secretary of the Interior approves the 
                plans for construction of such project by the non-
                Federal interest;
                    (B) if, after a review of studies and design 
                documents prepared pursuant to this section, the 
                Secretary of the Interior finds that construction of 
                the project meets the requirements in subsection (i); 
                and
                    (C) if the Secretary of the Interior determines 
                that the work for which reimbursement is requested has 
                been performed in accordance with applicable permits 
                and approved plans.
    (k) Nonreimbursement of Federal Costs.--Notwithstanding any 
provision of Federal reclamation laws (including the Act of June 17, 
1902 (32 Stat. 388), and all Acts amendatory thereof or supplemental 
thereto), the Federal share of funds authorized and appropriated to 
implement this section shall be considered a nonreimbursable Federal 
expenditure.
    (l) Other Water Supply Studies.--
            (1) Increased water supply through alteration of reservoir 
        operation.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary of the Interior 
                shall contract with the State of California to 
                undertake a study to determine opportunities to 
                increase the available water supply by altering the 
                operation of the reservoirs and related facilities 
                located on rivers that drain into the Sacramento and 
                San Joaquin Valleys owned by the Federal Government, 
                the State of California, local governments, and private 
                parties.
                    (B) Protection of property rights.--The study shall 
                be based on the protection of existing property rights, 
                recreational values, environmental values, and 
                operational and contractual constraints and 
                obligations.
                    (C) Assumption.--The study shall assume only 
                voluntary reoperation of the facilities.
                    (D) Limitation.--The completion of the study shall 
                not be a basis to delay or impact the operation, 
                relicensing, or transfer of ownership of any reservoir, 
                water project, or hydroelectric facility.
                    (E) Funding.--There is authorized to be 
                appropriated to carry out this paragraph $3,000,000.
            (2) Increased water supply storage at reservoirs draining 
        into california central valley.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary of the Interior 
                shall undertake a study of the opportunities to 
                increase available water supply storage at the Sites/
                Colusa Reservoir Project area, Cottonwood Creek 
                Reservoir Complex area, Yuba River Dam area, and other 
                potential reservoir sites that drain into the 
                California Central Valley.
                    (B) Protection of property rights.--The study shall 
                be based on the protection of existing property rights 
                and recreational values.
                    (C) Cooperation.--The study shall be completed in 
                cooperation with other related studies.
                    (D) Funding.--There is authorized to be 
                appropriated to carry out this paragraph $3,000,000.
    (m) American River Contract Administration.--
            (1) In general.--In order to reduce or moderate adverse 
        impacts to other Central Valley Project contractors resulting 
        from new contracts with a point of delivery on the American 
        River, the Secretary of the Interior shall administer Central 
        Valley Project water contracts on the American River, at any 
        given time or in any year, in cooperation with the city of 
        Sacramento, the Sacramento Municipal Utility District, or other 
        entities that operate facilities on the American River or 
        elsewhere in the Central Valley Project area to provide 
        American River water deliveries through improved or modified 
        voluntary operation and management of existing water storage 
        and conveyance facilities, including water transfers, on the 
        American River or elsewhere in the Central Valley Project area, 
        or through participation in feasible groundwater banking 
        programs that may be available.
            (2) Limitation on delivery of water.--The Secretary of the 
        Interior shall only deliver water pursuant to any contracts 
        with a point of delivery on the American River, in any year, 
        that the Central Valley Project water is actually needed by 
        American River Central Valley Project contractors in the 
        respective service areas of such contractors after considering 
        all other sources of water available to such contractors, 
        including the full utilization of all other water entitlements 
        and the implementation of water conservation by any such 
        contractor, and only in the amount actually needed.

SEC. 582. ALLOCATION OF APPROPRIATIONS

    (a) EIS and Planning Stage.--Except as provided in subsection (e), 
funds appropriated to carry out sections 580 and 581 of this Act for 
each of fiscal years 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003 shall be allocated 
according to the ratio of 60 percent for section 580 and 40 percent for 
section 581.
    (b) Intense Flood Control Construction Phase.--Except as provided 
in subsection (e), funds appropriated to carry out sections 580 and 581 
of this Act for each of fiscal years 2004, 2005, and 2006 shall be 
allocated according to the ratio of 90 percent for section 580 and 10 
percent for section 581.
    (c) Flood Control/Water Supply Transitional Phase.--Except as 
provided in subsection (e), funds appropriated to carry out sections 
580 and 581 of this Act for each of fiscal years 2007, 2008, 2009, and 
2010 shall be allocated according to the ratio of 75 percent for 
section 580 and 25 percent for section 581.
    (d) Project Completion Phase.--For each fiscal year following 
fiscal year 2010, funds appropriated to carry out sections 580 and 581 
of this Act shall be allocated according to a ratio of 25 percent for 
section 580 and 75 percent for section 581. In the event that design 
and construction activities under section 580 or 581 have been 
completed, all funds appropriated to carry out such sections shall be 
allocated to the remaining design and construction activities 
authorized under such section.
    (e) Limitation.--The allocation of appropriations required under 
subsections (a) through (d) shall not take effect for any fiscal year 
during which funds appropriated to carry out section 580 or 581 may not 
be obligated due to the failure to successfully complete any required 
feasibility studies or environmental reviews or the refusal or 
inability of a non-Federal interest to enter into a binding local 
agreement to carry out the items of local cooperation required pursuant 
to such section.

SEC. 583. WALLOPS ISLAND, VIRGINIA.

    (a) Emergency Action.--The Secretary shall take emergency action to 
protect Wallops Island, Virginia, from damaging coastal storms, by 
improving and extending the existing seawall, replenishing and 
renourishing the beach, and constructing protective dunes.
    (b) Reimbursement.--The Secretary shall seek reimbursement from 
other Federal agencies whose resources are protected by the emergency 
action taken under subsection (a).
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $8,000,000.
                                 <all>