[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 640 Reported in Senate (RS)]
Calendar No. 227
104th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 640
[Report No. 104-170]
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To provide for the conservation and development of water and related
resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various
projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States,
and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
November 9, 1995
Reported with an amendment
Calendar No. 227
104th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. 640
[Report No. 104-170]
To provide for the conservation and development of water and related
resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various
projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States,
and for other purposes.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
March 28 (legislative day, March 27), 1995
Mr. Warner (for himself, Mr. Chafee, Mr. Reid, Mr. Bond, Mr. Graham,
and Mr. McConnell) introduced the following bill; which was read twice
and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works
November 9, 1995
Reported by Mr. Chafee, with an amendment
[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed
in italic]
_______________________________________________________________________
A BILL
To provide for the conservation and development of water and related
resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various
projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States,
and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
<DELETED>SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water
Resources Development Act of 1995''.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents of this Act
is as follows:</DELETED>
<DELETED>Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
<DELETED>Sec. 2. Definition of Secretary.
<DELETED>TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS
<DELETED>Sec. 101. Project authorizations.
<DELETED>Sec. 102. Project modifications.
<DELETED>Sec. 103. Project deauthorizations.
<DELETED>Sec. 104. Studies.
<DELETED>TITLE II--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS
<DELETED>Sec. 201. Morgan Point, Arkansas.
<DELETED>Sec. 202. White River Basin Lakes, Arkansas and Missouri.
<DELETED>Sec. 203. Pine Flat Dam fish and wildlife habitat restoration,
California.
<DELETED>Sec. 204. Central and southern Florida.
<DELETED>Sec. 205. West Palm Beach, Florida.
<DELETED>Sec. 206. Periodic maintenance dredging for Greenville Inner
Harbor Channel, Mississippi.
<DELETED>Sec. 207. Sardis Lake, Mississippi.
<DELETED>Sec. 208. Libby Dam, Montana.
<DELETED>Sec. 209. Small flood control project, Malta, Montana.
<DELETED>Sec. 210. Cliffwood Beach, New Jersey.
<DELETED>Sec. 211. Fire Island Inlet, New York.
<DELETED>Sec. 212. Wister Lake project, LeFlore County, Oklahoma.
<DELETED>Sec. 213. Abandoned and wrecked barge removal, Rhode Island.
<DELETED>Sec. 214. Providence River and Harbor, Rhode Island.
<DELETED>Sec. 215. Rudee Inlet, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
<DELETED>Sec. 216. Virginia Beach, Virginia.
<DELETED>TITLE III--GENERAL PROVISIONS
<DELETED>Sec. 301. Cost-sharing for environmental projects.
<DELETED>Sec. 302. Collaborative research and development.
<DELETED>Sec. 303. National inventory of dams.
<DELETED>Sec. 304. Hydroelectric power project uprating.
<DELETED>Sec. 305. Federal lump-sum payments for Federal operation and
maintenance costs.
<DELETED>Sec. 306. Cost-sharing for removal of existing project
features.
<DELETED>Sec. 307. Termination of technical advisory committee.
<DELETED>Sec. 308. Conditions for project deauthorizations.
<DELETED>Sec. 309. Participation in international engineering and
scientific conferences.
<DELETED>Sec. 310. Research and development in support of Army civil
works program.
<DELETED>Sec. 311. Interagency and international support authority.
<DELETED>Sec. 312. Expansion of section 1135 program.
<DELETED>Sec. 313. Environmental dredging.
<DELETED>Sec. 314. Feasibility studies.
<DELETED>Sec. 315. Obstruction removal requirement.
<DELETED>Sec. 316. Levee owners manual.
<DELETED>Sec. 317. Risk-based analysis methodology.
<DELETED>Sec. 318. Sediments decontamination technology.
<DELETED>Sec. 319. Melaleuca tree.
<DELETED>Sec. 320. Faulkner Island, Connecticut.
<DELETED>Sec. 321. Designation of lock and dam at the Red River
Waterway, Louisiana.
<DELETED>Sec. 322. Jennings Randolph access road, Garrett County,
Maryland.
<DELETED>Sec. 323. New York State canal system.
<DELETED>Sec. 324. Quonset Point-Davisville, Rhode Island.
<DELETED>Sec. 325. Capital improvements for the Washington Aqueduct.
<DELETED>Sec. 326. Chesapeake Bay environmental restoration and
protection program.
<DELETED>Sec. 327. Technical corrections.
<DELETED>SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SECRETARY.</DELETED>
<DELETED> In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of
the Army.</DELETED>
<DELETED>TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 101. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.</DELETED>
<DELETED> Except as otherwise provided in this section, the
following projects for water resources development and conservation and
other purposes are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary
substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to the
conditions, recommended in the respective reports designated in this
section:</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) Marin county shoreline, san rafael canal,
california.--The project for hurricane and storm damage
reduction, Marin County Shoreline, San Rafael Canal,
California: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated January 28,
1994, at a total cost of $27,200,000, with an estimated Federal
cost of $17,700,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
$9,500,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) San lorenzo river, california.--The project
for flood control, San Lorenzo River, California: Report of the
Chief of Engineers, dated June 30, 1994, at a total cost of
$16,100,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $8,100,000 and
an estimated non-Federal cost of $8,000,000 and the habitat
restoration, at a total cost of $4,050,000, with an estimated
Federal cost of $3,040,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
$1,010,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (3) Santa barbara harbor, santa barbara county,
california.--The project for navigation, Santa Barbara Harbor,
Santa Barbara, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers,
dated April 26, 1994, at a total cost of $5,720,000, with an
estimated Federal cost of $4,580,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $1,140,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (4) Palm valley bridge replacement, st. johns
county, florida.--The project for navigation, Palm Valley
Bridge, County Road 210, over the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway in St. Johns County, Florida: Report of the Chief of
Engineers, dated June 24, 1994, at a total Federal cost of
$15,312,000. As a condition of receipt of Federal funds, St.
Johns County shall assume full ownership of the replacement
bridge, including all associated operation, maintenance,
repair, replacement, and rehabilitation costs.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (5) Illinois shoreline erosion, interim iii,
wilmette to illinois and indiana state line.--The project for
storm damage reduction and shoreline erosion protection from
Wilmette, Illinois, to the Illinois and Indiana State line:
Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated April 14, 1994, at a
total cost of $197,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
$106,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $91,000,000,
and the breakwater near the South Water Filtration Plant, a
separable element of the project at a total cost of $9,027,000,
with an estimated Federal cost of $5,868,000 and an estimated
non-Federal cost of $3,159,000. The operation, maintenance,
repair, replacement, and rehabilitation of the project after
construction shall be the responsibility of the non-Federal
interests.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (6) Kentucky lock addition, kentucky.--The project
for navigation, Kentucky Lock Addition, Kentucky: Report of the
Chief of Engineers, dated June 1, 1992, at a total cost of
$467,000,000. The construction costs of the project shall be
paid--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (A) 50 percent from amounts appropriated
from the general fund of the Treasury; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (B) 50 percent from amounts appropriated
from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund established by
section 9506 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (7) Wolf creek hydropower, cumberland river,
kentucky.--The project for hydropower, Wolf Creek Dam and Lake
Cumberland, Kentucky: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated
June 28, 1994, at a total cost of $50,230,000. Funds derived by
the Tennessee Valley Authority from the power program of the
Authority and funds derived from any private or public entity
designated by the Southeastern Power Administration may be used
for all or part of any cost-sharing requirements for the
project.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (8) Stabilization of natchez bluffs,
mississippi.--The project for bluff stabilization, Natchez
Bluffs, Natchez, Mississippi: Natchez Bluffs Study, dated
September 1985, Natchez Bluffs Study: Supplement I, dated June
1990, and Natchez Bluffs Study: Supplement II, dated December
1993, in the portions of the bluffs described in the reports
designated in this paragraph as Clifton Avenue, area 3; Bluff
above Silver Street, area 6; Bluff above Natchez Under-the-
Hill, area 7; and Madison Street to State Street, area 4, at a
total cost of $17,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
$12,900,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
$4,300,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (9) Wood river at grand island, nebraska.--The
project for flood control, Wood River at Grand Island,
Nebraska: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated May 3, 1994,
at a total cost of $10,500,000, with an estimated Federal cost
of $5,250,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
$5,250,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (10) Wilmington harbor, cape fear-northeast cape
fear rivers, north carolina.--The project for navigation,
Wilmington Harbor, Cape Fear-Northeast Cape Fear Rivers, North
Carolina: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 24,
1994, at a total cost of $23,290,000, with an estimated Federal
cost of $16,955,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
$6,335,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (11) Duck creek, ohio.--The project for flood
control, Duck Creek, Cincinnati, Ohio: Report of the Chief of
Engineers, dated July 28, 1994, at a total cost of $15,408,000,
with an estimated Federal cost of $11,556,000 and an estimated
non-Federal cost of $3,852,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (12) Pond creek, ohio.--The project for flood
control, Pond Creek, Ohio: Report of the Chief of Engineers,
dated June 28, 1994, at a total cost of $16,865,000, with an
estimated Federal cost of $11,243,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $5,622,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (13) Coos bay, oregon.--The project for
navigation, Coos Bay, Oregon: Report of the Chief of Engineers,
dated June 30, 1994, at a total cost of $14,541,000, with an
estimated Federal cost of $10,777,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $3,764,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (14) Big sioux river and skunk creek at sioux
falls, south dakota.--The project for flood control, Big Sioux
River and Skunk Creek at Sioux Falls, South Dakota: Report of
the Chief of Engineers, dated June 30, 1994, at a total cost of
$31,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $23,600,000 and
an estimated non-Federal cost of $8,000,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (15) Atlantic intracoastal waterway bridge
replacement at great bridge, chesapeake, virginia.--The project
for navigation at Great Bridge, Virginia Highway 168, over the
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway in Chesapeake, Virginia: Report
of the Chief of Engineers, dated July 1, 1994, at a total cost
of $23,680,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $20,341,000
and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,339,000. The city of
Chesapeake shall assume full ownership of the replacement
bridge, including all associated operation, maintenance,
repair, replacement, and rehabilitation costs.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (16) Marmet lock replacement, kanawha river, west
virginia.--The project for navigation, Marmet Lock Replacement,
Marmet Locks and Dam, Kanawha River, West Virginia: Report of
the Chief of Engineers, dated June 24, 1994, at a total cost of
$267,900,000. The construction costs of the project shall be
paid--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (A) 50 percent from amounts appropriated
from the general fund of the Treasury; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (B) 50 percent from amounts appropriated
from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund established by
section 9506 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 102. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (a) Oakland Harbor, California.--The projects for
navigation, Oakland Outer Harbor, California, and Oakland Inner Harbor,
California, authorized by section 202(a) of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4092), are
modified to combine the 2 projects into 1 project, to be designated as
the Oakland Harbor, California, project. The Oakland Harbor,
California, project shall be carried out by the Secretary substantially
in accordance with the plans and subject to the conditions recommended
in the reports designated for the projects in the section, except that
the non-Federal share of project cost and any available credits toward
the non-Federal share shall be calculated on the basis of the total
cost of the combined project. The total cost of the combined project is
$102,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $64,120,000 and an
estimated non-Federal cost of $38,480,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (b) North Branch of Chicago River, Illinois.--The project
for flood control for the North Branch of the Chicago River, Illinois,
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of
1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4115), is modified to authorize the
Secretary to carry out the project substantially in accordance with the
post authorization change report for the project dated March 1994, at a
total cost of $34,800,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
$20,774,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $14,026,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (c) Arkansas City, Kansas.--The project for flood control,
Arkansas City, Kansas, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4116),
is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project
substantially in accordance with the post authorization change report
for the project dated June 1994, at a total cost of $35,700,000, with
an estimated Federal cost of $26,600,000 and an estimated non-Federal
cost of $9,100,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (d) Halstead, Kansas.--The project for flood control,
Halstead, Kansas, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4116), is
modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project
substantially in accordance with the post authorization change report
for the project dated March 1993, at a total cost of $11,100,000, with
an estimated Federal cost of $8,325,000 and an estimated non-Federal
cost of $2,775,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (e) Baptiste Collette Bayou, Louisiana.--The project for
navigation, Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, Louisiana, authorized by
section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (Public Law 90-483; 82
Stat. 731), is modified to provide for the extension of the 16-foot
deep (mean low gulf) by 250-foot wide Baptiste Collette Bayou entrance
channel to approximately mile 8 of the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet
navigation channel at a total estimated Federal cost of $80,000,
including $4,000 for surveys and $76,000 for Coast Guard aids to
navigation.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (f) Cape Girardeau, Missouri.--The project for flood
control, Cape Girardeau, Jackson Metropolitan Area, Missouri,
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of
1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4118-4119), is modified to authorize
the Secretary to carry out the project, including the implementation of
nonstructural measures, at a total cost of $44,700,000, with an
estimated Federal cost of $32,600,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost
of $12,100,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (g) Wilmington Harbor-Northeast Cape Fear River, North
Carolina.--The project for navigation, Wilmington Harbor-Northeast Cape
Fear River, North Carolina, authorized by section 202(a) of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4095)
is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project
substantially in accordance with the general design memorandum for the
project dated April 1990 and the general design memorandum supplement
for the project dated February 1994, at a total cost of $50,921,000,
with an estimated Federal cost of $25,128,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $25,793,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (h) Saw Mill Run, Pennsylvania.--The project for flood
control, Saw Mill Run, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, authorized by section
401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-
662; 100 Stat. 4124), is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry
out the project substantially in accordance with the post authorization
change and general reevaluation report for the project, dated April
1994, at a total cost of $12,496,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
$9,372,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,124,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (i) India Point Bridge, Seekonk River, Providence, Rhode
Island.--The project for the removal and demolition of the India Point
Railroad Bridge, Seekonk River, Rhode Island, authorized by section
1166(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-
662; 100 Stat. 4258), is modified to authorize the Secretary to
demolish and remove the center span of the bridge, at a total cost of
$1,300,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $650,000, and an
estimated non-Federal cost of $650,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (j) Upper Jordan River, Utah.--The project for flood
control, Upper Jordan River, Utah, authorized by section 101(a)(23) of
the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-640; 104
Stat. 4610), is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry out the
project substantially in accordance with the general design memorandum
for the project dated March 1994, and the post authorization change
report for the project dated April 1994, at a total cost of
$12,370,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $8,220,000 and an
estimated non-Federal cost of $4,150,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 103. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (a) Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut.--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) Anchorage area.--The portion of the project
for navigation, Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by
section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (Public Law 85-
500; 72 Stat. 297), consisting of a 2-acre anchorage area with
a depth of 6 feet at the head of Johnsons River between the
Federal channel and Hollisters Dam, is deauthorized.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) Johnsons river channel.--The portion of the
project for navigation, Johnsons River Channel, Bridgeport
Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the first section of the Act
entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction, repair, and
preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and
for other purposes'', approved July 24, 1946 (60 Stat. 634,
chapter 595), that is northerly of a line across the Federal
channel the coordinates of which are north 123318.35, east
486301.68, and north 123257.15, east 486380.77, is
deauthorized.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (b) Southport Harbor, Connecticut.--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) In general.--The following portions of the
project for navigation, Southport Harbor, Connecticut,
authorized by the first section of the Act entitled ``An Act
authorizing the construction, repair, and preservation of
certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other
purposes'', approved August 30, 1935 (chapter 831, 49 Stat.
1029), are deauthorized:</DELETED>
<DELETED> (A) The 6-foot deep anchorage located at
the head of the project.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (B) The portion of the 9-foot deep channel
beginning at a bend in the channel the coordinates of
which are north 109131.16, east 452653.32, running
thence in a northeasterly direction about 943.01 feet
to a point the coordinates of which are north
109635.22, east 453450.31, running thence in a
southeasterly direction about 22.66 feet to a point the
coordinates of which are north 109617.15, east
453463.98, running thence in a southwesterly direction
about 945.18 feet to the point of beginning.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) Remainder.--The portion of the project
referred to in paragraph (1) that is remaining after the
deauthorization made by the paragraph and that is northerly of
a line the coordinates of which are north 108699.15, east
452768.36, and north 108655.66, east 452858.73, is redesignated
as an anchorage.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (c) East Boothbay Harbor, Maine.--The following portion of
the navigation project for East Boothbay Harbor, Maine, authorized by
the first section of the Act of June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 631, chapter
382) (commonly referred to as the ``River and Harbor Act of 1910''),
containing approximately 1.15 acres and described in accordance with
the Maine State Coordinate System, East Zone, is
deauthorized:</DELETED>
<DELETED> Beginning at a point noted as point number 6 and
shown as having plan coordinates of North 9, 722, East 9, 909
on the plan entitled, ``East Boothbay Harbor, Maine,
examination, 8-foot area'', and dated August 9, 1955, Drawing
Number F1251 D-6-2, said point having Maine State Coordinate
System, East Zone coordinates of Northing 74514, Easting
698381; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> Thence, North 58 degrees, 12 minutes, 30 seconds
East a distance of 120.9 feet to a point; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> Thence, South 72 degrees, 21 minutes, 50 seconds
East a distance of 106.2 feet to a point; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> Thence, South 32 degrees, 04 minutes, 55 seconds
East a distance of 218.9 feet to a point; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> Thence, South 61 degrees, 29 minutes, 40 seconds
West a distance of 148.9 feet to a point; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> Thence, North 35 degrees, 14 minutes, 12 seconds
West a distance of 87.5 feet to a point; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> Thence, North 78 degrees, 30 minutes, 58 seconds
West a distance of 68.4 feet to a point; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> Thence, North 27 degrees, 11 minutes, 39 seconds
West a distance of 157.3 feet to the point of
beginning.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (d) Fall River Harbor, Massachusetts and Rhode Island.--
The project for navigation, Fall River Harbor, Massachusetts and Rhode
Island, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968
(Public Law 90-483; 82 Stat. 731), is modified to provide that
alteration of the drawspan of the Brightman Street Bridge to provide a
channel width of 300 feet shall not be required after the date of
enactment of this Act.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (e) Oswegatchie River, Ogdensburg, New York.--The portion
of the Federal channel in the Oswegatchie River in Ogdensburg, New
York, from the southernmost alignment of the Route 68 bridge, upstream
to the northernmost alignment of the Lake Street bridge, is
deauthorized.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (f) Kickapoo River, Wisconsin.--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) Project modification.--The project for flood
control and allied purposes, Kickapoo River, Wisconsin,
authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962
(Public Law 87-874; 76 Stat. 1190), as modified by section 814
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-
662; 100 Stat. 4169), is further modified as provided by this
subsection.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) Transfer of property.--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (A) In general.--Subject to the
requirements of this paragraph, the Secretary shall
transfer to the State of Wisconsin, without
consideration, all right, title, and interest of the
United States in and to the lands described in
subparagraph (B), including all works, structures, and
other improvements on the lands.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (B) Land description.--The lands to be
transferred pursuant to subparagraph (A) are the
approximately 8,569 acres of land associated with the
LaFarge Dam and Lake portion of the project referred to
in paragraph (1) in Vernon County, Wisconsin, in the
following sections:</DELETED>
<DELETED> (i) Section 31, Township 14 North,
Range 1 West of the 4th Principal
Meridian.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (ii) Sections 2 through 11, and
16, 17, 20, and 21, Township 13 North, Range 2
West of the 4th Principal Meridian.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (iii) Sections 15, 16, 21 through
24, 26, 27, 31, and 33 through 36, Township 14
North, Range 2 West of the 4th Principal
Meridian.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (C) Terms and conditions.--The transfer
under subparagraph (A) shall be made on the condition
that the State of Wisconsin enters into a written
agreement with the Secretary to hold the United States
harmless from all claims arising from or through the
operation of the lands and improvements subject to the
transfer.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (D) Deadlines.--Not later than July 1,
1995, the Secretary shall transmit to the State of
Wisconsin an offer to make the transfer under this
paragraph. The offer shall provide for the transfer to
be made in the period beginning on November 1, 1995,
and ending on December 31, 1995.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (E) Deauthorization.--The LaFarge Dam and
Lake portion of the project referred to in paragraph
(1) is not authorized after the date of the transfer
under this paragraph.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (F) Interim management and maintenance.--
The Secretary shall continue to manage and maintain the
LaFarge Dam and Lake portion of project referred to in
paragraph (1) until the date of the transfer under this
paragraph.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 104. STUDIES.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (a) Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California.--Not
later than 18 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the
Secretary shall--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) conduct a study of the advisability of
modifying, for the purpose of flood control pursuant to section
205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), the Lake
Elsinore, Riverside County, California, flood control project,
for water conservation storage up to an elevation of 1,249 feet
above mean sea level; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) report to Congress on the study, including
making recommendations concerning the advisability of so
modifying the project.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (b) Long Beach, California.--The Secretary shall review
the feasibility of navigation improvements at Long Beach Harbor,
California, including widening and deepening of the navigation channel,
as provided for in section 201(b) of the Water Resources Development
Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4091). The Secretary shall
complete the report not later than 1 year after the date of enactment
of this Act.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (c) Murrieta Creek, Riverside County, California.--The
Secretary shall review the completed feasibility study of the Riverside
County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, including
identified alternatives, concerning Murrieta Creek from Temecula to
Wildomar, Riverside County, California, to determine the Federal
interest in participating in a project for flood control.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (d) Pine Flat Dam Fish and Wildlife Habitat Restoration,
California.--The Secretary shall study the feasibility of fish and
wildlife habitat improvement measures identified for further study by
the Pine Flat Dam Fish and Wildlife Habitat Restoration Investigation
Reconnaissance Report.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (e) West Dade, Florida.--The Secretary shall conduct a
reconnaissance study to determine the Federal interest in using the
West Dade, Florida, reuse facility to increase the supply of surface
water to the Everglades in order to enhance fish and wildlife
habitat.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (f) Ohio River Greenway, Indiana.--The Secretary shall
conduct a study to determine the feasibility of the greenway project
along the Ohio River in Jeffersonville, Clarksville, and New Albany,
Indiana, as described in the plan entitled ``Conceptual Master Plan:
Falls of the Ohio River Greenway Corridor'', as prepared by the Army
Corps of Engineers in 1994.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (g) White River, Indiana.--The Secretary shall conduct a
study to determine the feasibility of riverfront modifications as
described in the report entitled ``Indianapolis, Indiana, White River
Central Waterfront Reconnaissance Report'', dated October
1993.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (h) Bayou Blanc, Crowley, Louisiana.--The Secretary shall
conduct a reconnaissance study to determine the Federal interest in the
construction of a bulkhead system, consisting of either steel sheet
piling with tiebacks or concrete, along the embankment of Bayou Blanc,
Crowley, Louisiana, in order to alleviate slope failures and erosion
problems in a cost-effective manner.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (i) Hackberry Industrial Ship Channel Park, Louisiana.--
The Secretary shall incorporate the area of Hackberry, Louisiana, as
part of the overall study of the Lake Charles ship channel, bypass
channel, and general anchorage area in Louisiana, to explore the
possibility of constructing additional anchorage areas.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (j) Lower Platte River, Nebraska.--The Secretary shall
conduct a reconnaissance study of the Lower Platte River to determine
the Federal interest in flood control and related water resources
development in the study area. The Secretary shall consider
nonstructural and structural measures for the management of the
floodplain.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (k) City of North Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada.--The
Secretary shall conduct a reconnaissance study to determine the Federal
interest in channel improvements in channel A of the North Las Vegas
Wash in the city of North Las Vegas, Nevada, for the purpose of flood
control.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (l) Lower Las Vegas Wash Wetlands, Clark County, Nevada.--
The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of the
restoration of wetlands in the Lower Las Vegas Wash, Nevada, for the
purposes of erosion control and environmental restoration.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (m) Northern Nevada.--The Secretary shall conduct
reconnaissance studies, in the State of Nevada, of--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) the Humboldt River, and the tributaries and
outlets of the river;</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) the Truckee River, and the tributaries and
outlets of the river;</DELETED>
<DELETED> (3) the Carson River, and the tributaries and
outlets of the river; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (4) the Walker River, and the tributaries and
outlets of the river;</DELETED>
<DELETED>in order to determine the Federal interest in flood control,
environmental restoration, conservation of fish and wildlife,
recreation, water conservation, water quality, and toxic and
radioactive waste.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (n) Buffalo Harbor, New York.--The Secretary shall
determine the feasibility of excavating the inner harbor and
constructing the associated bulkheads in Buffalo Harbor, New
York.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (o) Coeymans, New York.--The Secretary shall conduct a
reconnaissance study to determine the Federal interest in reopening the
secondary channel of the Hudson River in the town of Coeymans, New
York, which has been narrowed by silt as a result of the construction
of Coeymans middle dike by the Army Corps of Engineers.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (p) Flushing Bay, New York.--The Secretary shall determine
the feasibility of dredging the area of Flushing Bay, New York,
directly surrounding the earthen dike to--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) restore water depths to pre-1963
levels;</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) improve the water quality;</DELETED>
<DELETED> (3) restore tidal patterns of the bay through the
removal of mudflats; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (4) partially remove a portion of the dike for use
as fill for a runway extension at LaGuardia Airport.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (q) Shinnecock Inlet, New York.--Not later than 2 years
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall conduct a
reconnaissance study in Shinnecock Inlet, New York, to determine the
Federal interest in constructing a sand bypass system, or other
appropriate alternative, for the purposes of allowing sand to flow in
the natural east-to-west pattern of the sand and preventing the further
erosion of the beaches west of the inlet and the shoaling of the
inlet.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (r) Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay Channels, New York and
New Jersey.--The Secretary shall continue engineering and design in
order to complete the navigation project at Kill Van Kull and Newark
Bay Channels, New York and New Jersey, authorized to be constructed in
the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (Public Law 99-88; 99 Stat.
313), and section 202(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986
(Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4095), described in the general design
memorandum for the project, and approved in the Report of the Chief of
Engineers dated December 14, 1981.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (s) Columbia Slough, Oregon.--Not later than 2 years after
the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall complete a
feasibility study for the ecosystem restoration project at Columbia
Slough, Oregon, as reported in the August 1993 Revised Reconnaissance
Study. The study shall be a demonstration study done in coordination
with the Environmental Protection Agency.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (t) Dallas Floodway Extension, Texas.--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study of
the flood control project for Dallas Floodway Extension,
Dallas, Texas, authorized by section 301 of the Flood Control
Act of 1965 (Public Law 89-298; 79 Stat. 1091), for the purpose
of determining the feasibility of providing additional flood
protection to the Central Wastewater Treatment Plant and the
area known as Rochester Park.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) Report.--The results of the study conducted
under paragraph (1) shall be included in the report presenting
the results of the ongoing reevaluation study of the authorized
project.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (u) Ashley Creek, Utah.--The Secretary is authorized to
study the feasibility of undertaking a project for fish and wildlife
restoration at Ashley Creek, near Vernal, Utah.</DELETED>
<DELETED>TITLE II--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 201. MORGAN POINT, ARKANSAS.</DELETED>
<DELETED> The Secretary shall accept as in-kind contributions for
the project at Morgan Point, Arkansas--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) the items described as fish and wildlife
facilities and land in the Morgan Point Broadway Closure
Structure modification report for the project, dated February
1994; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) fish stocking activities carried out by the
non-Federal interests for the project.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 202. WHITE RIVER BASIN LAKES, ARKANSAS AND
MISSOURI.</DELETED>
<DELETED> The project for flood control and power generation at
White River Basin Lakes, Arkansas and Missouri, authorized by section 4
of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of certain
public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for other
purposes'', approved June 28, 1938 (commonly referred to as the ``Flood
Control Act of 1938'') (52 Stat. 1218), shall include recreation and
fish and wildlife mitigation as purposes of the project, to the extent
that the purposes do not adversely impact flood control, power
generation, or other authorized purposes of the project.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 203. PINE FLAT DAM FISH AND WILDLIFE HABITAT RESTORATION,
CALIFORNIA.</DELETED>
<DELETED> The Secretary shall carry out, in accordance with section
1135(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C.
2309a(b)), the construction of a turbine bypass at Pine Flat Dam, Kings
River, California.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 204. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA.</DELETED>
<DELETED> The project for Central and Southern Florida, authorized
by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (Public Law 90-483; 82
Stat. 740), is modified, subject to the availability of appropriations,
to authorize the Secretary to implement the recommended plan of
improvement contained in a report entitled ``Central and Southern
Florida Project, Final Integrated General Reevaluation Report and
Environmental Impact Statement, Canal 111 (C-111), South Dade County,
Florida'', dated May 1994 (including acquisition of such portions of
the Frog Pond and Rocky Glades areas as are needed for the project), at
a total cost of $121,000,000. The Federal share of the cost of
implementing the plan of improvement shall be 50 percent. The Secretary
of the Interior shall pay 25 percent of the cost of acquiring such
portions of the Frog Pond and Rocky Glades areas as are needed for the
project, which amount shall be included in the Federal share. The non-
Federal share of the operation and maintenance costs of the
improvements undertaken pursuant to this section shall be 100 percent,
except that the Federal Government shall reimburse the non-Federal
interest in an amount equal to 60 percent of the costs of operating and
maintaining pump stations that pump water into Taylor Slough in
Everglades National Park.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 205. WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA.</DELETED>
<DELETED> The project for flood protection of West Palm Beach,
Florida (C-51), authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of
1962 (Public Law 87-874; 76 Stat. 1183), is modified to provide for the
construction of an enlarged stormwater detention area, Storm Water
Treatment Area 1 East, generally in accordance with the plan of
improvements described in the February 15, 1994, report entitled
``Everglades Protection Project, Palm Beach County, Florida, Conceptual
Design'', prepared by Burns and McDonnell, and as further described in
detailed design documents to be approved by the Secretary. The
additional work authorized by this section shall be accomplished at
full Federal cost in recognition of the water supply benefits accruing
to the Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge and the Everglades National
Park and in recognition of the statement in support of the Everglades
restoration effort set forth in the document signed by the Secretary of
the Interior and the Secretary of the Army in July 1993. Operation and
maintenance of the stormwater detention area shall be consistent with
regulations prescribed by the Secretary for the Central and Southern
Florida project, with all costs of the operation and maintenance work
borne by non-Federal interests.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 206. PERIODIC MAINTENANCE DREDGING FOR GREENVILLE INNER
HARBOR CHANNEL, MISSISSIPPI.</DELETED>
<DELETED> The Greenville Inner Harbor Channel, Mississippi, is
deemed to be a portion of the navigable waters of the United States,
and shall be included among the navigable waters for which the Army
Corps of Engineers maintains a 10-foot navigable channel. The navigable
channel for the Greenville Inner Harbor Channel shall be maintained in
a manner that is consistent with the navigable channel to the
Greenville Harbor and the portion of the Mississippi River adjacent to
the Greenville Harbor that is maintained by the Army Corps of
Engineers, as in existence on the date of enactment of this
Act.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 207. SARDIS LAKE, MISSISSIPPI.</DELETED>
<DELETED> The Secretary shall work cooperatively with the State of
Mississippi and the city of Sardis to the maximum extent practicable in
the management of existing and proposed leases of land consistent with
the master tourism and recreational plan for the economic development
of the Sardis Lake area prepared by the city.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 208. LIBBY DAM, MONTANA.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (a) In General.--In accordance with section 103(c)(1) of
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(c)(1)), the
Secretary shall--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) complete the construction and installation of
generating units 6 through 8 at Libby Dam, Montana;
and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) remove the partially constructed haul bridge
over the Kootenai River, Montana.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized
to be appropriated to carry out this section $16,000,000, to remain
available until expended.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 209. SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, MALTA,
MONTANA.</DELETED>
<DELETED> Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this
Act, the Secretary is authorized to expend such Federal funds as are
necessary to complete the small flood control project begun at Malta,
Montana, pursuant to section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33
U.S.C. 701s).</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 210. CLIFFWOOD BEACH, NEW JERSEY.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of
law or the status of the project authorized by section 203 of the Flood
Control Act of 1962 (Public Law 87-874; 76 Stat. 1180) for hurricane-
flood protection and beach erosion control on Raritan Bay and Sandy
Hook Bay, New Jersey, the Secretary shall undertake a project to
provide periodic beach nourishment for Cliffwood Beach, New Jersey, for
a 50-year period beginning on the date of execution of a project
cooperation agreement by the Secretary and an appropriate non-Federal
interest.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (b) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost
of the project authorized by this section shall be 35
percent.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 211. FIRE ISLAND INLET, NEW YORK.</DELETED>
<DELETED> For the purpose of replenishing the beach, the Secretary
shall place sand dredged from the Fire Island Inlet on the shoreline
between Gilgo State Park and Tobay Beach to protect Ocean Parkway along
the Atlantic Ocean shoreline in Suffolk County, New York.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 212. WISTER LAKE PROJECT, LEFLORE COUNTY,
OKLAHOMA.</DELETED>
<DELETED> The Secretary shall maintain a minimum conservation pool
level of 478 feet at the Wister Lake project in LeFlore County,
Oklahoma, authorized by section 4 of the Act entitled ``An Act
authorizing the construction of certain public works on rivers and
harbors for flood control, and for other purposes'', approved June 28,
1938 (commonly referred to as the ``Flood Control Act of 1938'') (52
Stat. 1218). Notwithstanding title I of the Water Resources Development
Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211 et seq.) or any other provision of law, any
increase in water supply yield that results from the pool level of 478
feet shall be treated as unallocated water supply until such time as a
user enters into a contract for the supply under such applicable laws
concerning cost-sharing as are in effect on the date of the
contract.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 213. ABANDONED AND WRECKED BARGE REMOVAL, RHODE
ISLAND.</DELETED>
<DELETED> Section 361 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992
(Public Law 102-580; 106 Stat. 4861) is amended by striking subsection
(a) and inserting the following:</DELETED>
<DELETED> ``(a) In General.--In order to alleviate a hazard to
navigation and recreational activity, the Secretary shall remove a
sunken barge from waters off the shore of the Narragansett Town Beach
in Narragansett, Rhode Island, at a total cost of $1,700,000, with an
estimated Federal cost of $1,275,000, and an estimated non-Federal cost
of $425,000. The Secretary shall not remove the barge until title to
the barge has been transferred to the United States or the non-Federal
interest. The transfer of title shall be carried out at no cost to the
United States.''.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 214. PROVIDENCE RIVER AND HARBOR, RHODE ISLAND.</DELETED>
<DELETED> The Secretary shall incorporate a channel extending from
the vicinity of the Fox Point hurricane barrier to the vicinity of the
Francis Street bridge in Providence, Rhode Island, into the navigation
project for Providence River and Harbor, Rhode Island, authorized by
section 301 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (Public Law 89-298; 79
Stat. 1089). The channel shall have a depth of up to 10 feet and a
width of approximately 120 feet and shall be approximately 1.25 miles
in length.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 215. RUDEE INLET, VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA.</DELETED>
<DELETED> Notwithstanding the limitation set forth in section 107(b)
of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577(b)), Federal
participation in the maintenance of the Rudee Inlet, Virginia Beach,
Virginia, project shall continue for the life of the project. Nothing
in this section shall alter or modify the non-Federal cost sharing
responsibility as specified in the Rudee Inlet, Virginia Beach,
Virginia Detailed Project Report, dated October 1983.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 216. VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA.</DELETED>
<DELETED> Section 407 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990
(Public Law 101-640; 104 Stat. 4647) is amended by adding at the end
the following:</DELETED>
<DELETED> ``(c) Funding.--</DELETED>
<DELETED> ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall budget, for
fiscal year 1996, $3,120,803, or such amount as is determined
by a Federal audit carried out by the Army Corps of Engineers,
to be paid to the city of Virginia Beach as reimbursement for
beach nourishment activities undertaken by the city from
October 1, 1986, to September 30, 1993, pursuant to subsection
(a). The funds required to be budgeted under the preceding
sentence may not be used to carry out the beach nourishment
project being performed, as of the date of enactment of this
paragraph, pursuant to the local cooperative agreement dated
August 9, 1993.</DELETED>
<DELETED> ``(2) Failure to pay.--If the Secretary does not
make the payment described in paragraph (1) by February 6,
1997, the Secretary shall pay to the city of Virginia Beach
$3,120,803, or such amount as is determined by the Federal
audit referred to in paragraph (1).''.</DELETED>
<DELETED>TITLE III--GENERAL PROVISIONS</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 301. COST-SHARING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS.</DELETED>
<DELETED> Section 103(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(c)) is amended--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) in paragraph (5), by striking ``and'' at the
end;</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) in paragraph (6), by striking the period at
the end and inserting ``; and''; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (3) by adding at the end the following:</DELETED>
<DELETED> ``(7) environmental protection and restoration: 25
percent.''.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 302. COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.</DELETED>
<DELETED> Section 7 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988
(33 U.S.C. 2313) is amended--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) by striking subsection (e);</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection
(e); and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (3) by inserting after subsection (c) the
following:</DELETED>
<DELETED> ``(d) Temporary Protection of Technology.--</DELETED>
<DELETED> ``(1) Pre-agreement.--If the Secretary determines
that information developed as a result of a research or
development activity conducted by the Army Corps of Engineers
is likely to be subject to a cooperative research and
development agreement within 2 years after the development of
the information, and that the information would be a trade
secret or commercial or financial information that would be
privileged or confidential if the information had been obtained
from a non-Federal party participating in a cooperative
research and development agreement under section 12 of the
Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C.
3710a), the Secretary may provide appropriate protections
against the dissemination of the information, including
exemption from subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5, United
States Code, until the earlier of--</DELETED>
<DELETED> ``(A) the date on which the Secretary
enters into such an agreement with respect to the
information; or</DELETED>
<DELETED> ``(B) the last day of the 2-year period
beginning on the date of the determination.</DELETED>
<DELETED> ``(2) Post-agreement.--Any information subject to
paragraph (1) that becomes the subject of a cooperative
research and development agreement shall be subject to the
protections provided under section 12(c)(7)(B) of the Act (15
U.S.C. 3710a(c)(7)(B)) as if the information had been developed
under a cooperative research and development
agreement.''.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 303. NATIONAL INVENTORY OF DAMS.</DELETED>
<DELETED> Section 13 of Public Law 92-367 (33 U.S.C. 467l) is
amended by striking the second sentence and inserting the following:
``There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section
$500,000 for each fiscal year.''.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 304. HYDROELECTRIC POWER PROJECT UPRATING.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (a) In General.--In carrying out the maintenance,
rehabilitation, and modernization of a hydroelectric power generating
facility at a water resources project under the jurisdiction of the
Department of the Army, the Secretary is authorized to take such
actions as are necessary to increase the efficiency of energy
production or the capacity of the facility, or both, if, after
consulting with the heads of other appropriate Federal and State
agencies, the Secretary determines that the increase--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) is economically justified and financially
feasible;</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) will not result in any significant adverse
effect on the other purposes for which the project is
authorized;</DELETED>
<DELETED> (3) will not result in significant adverse
environmental impacts; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (4) will not involve major structural or
operational changes in the project.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (b) Effect on Other Authority.--This section shall not
affect the authority of the Secretary and the Administrator of the
Bonneville Power Administration under section 2406 of the Energy Policy
Act of 1992 (16 U.S.C. 839d-1).</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 305. FEDERAL LUMP-SUM PAYMENTS FOR FEDERAL OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE COSTS.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (a) In General.--In the case of a water resources project
under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Army for which the non-
Federal interests are responsible for performing the operation,
maintenance, replacement, and rehabilitation of the project, or a
separable element (as defined in section 103(f) of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(f)) of the project, and for
which the Federal Government is responsible for paying a portion of the
operation, maintenance, replacement, and rehabilitation costs of the
project or separable element, the Secretary may make, in accordance
with this section and under terms and conditions acceptable to the
Secretary, a payment of the estimated total Federal share of the costs
to the non-Federal interests after completion of construction of the
project or separable element.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (b) Amount of Payment.--The amount that may be paid by the
Secretary under subsection (a) shall be equal to the present value of
the Federal payments over the life of the project, as estimated by the
Federal Government, and shall be computed using an interest rate
determined by the Secretary of the Treasury taking into consideration
current market yields on outstanding marketable obligations of the
United States with maturities comparable to the remaining life of the
project.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (c) Agreement.--The Secretary may make a payment under
this section only if the non-Federal interests have entered into a
binding agreement with the Secretary to perform the operation,
maintenance, replacement, and rehabilitation of the project or
separable element. The agreement shall--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) meet the requirements of section 221 of the
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b); and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) specify--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (A) the terms and conditions under which a
payment may be made under this section; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (B) the rights of, and remedies available
to, the Federal Government to recover all or a portion
of a payment made under this section if a non-Federal
interest suspends or terminates the performance by the
non-Federal interest of the operation, maintenance,
replacement, and rehabilitation of the project or
separable element, or fails to perform the activities
in a manner that is satisfactory to the
Secretary.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (d) Effect of Payment.--Except as provided in subsection
(c), a payment provided to the non-Federal interests under this section
shall relieve the Federal Government of any obligation, after the date
of the payment, to pay any of the operation, maintenance, replacement,
or rehabilitation costs for the project or separable element.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 306. COST-SHARING FOR REMOVAL OF EXISTING PROJECT
FEATURES.</DELETED>
<DELETED> After the date of enactment of this Act, any proposal
submitted to Congress by the Secretary for modification of an existing
authorized water resources development project (in existence on the
date of the proposal) by removal of one or more of the project features
that would significantly and adversely impact the authorized project
purposes or outputs shall include the recommendation that the non-
Federal interests shall provide 50 percent of the cost of any such
modification, including the cost of acquiring any additional interests
in lands that become necessary for accomplishing the
modification.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 307. TERMINATION OF TECHNICAL ADVISORY
COMMITTEE.</DELETED>
<DELETED> Section 310 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990
(33 U.S.C. 2319) is amended--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) by striking subsection (a); and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) in subsection (b)--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (A) by striking ``(b) Public
Participation.--''; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (B) by striking ``subsection'' each place
it appears and inserting ``section''.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 308. CONDITIONS FOR PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (a) In General.--Section 1001(b)(2) of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)) is amended--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``10'' and
inserting ``5'';</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) in the second sentence, by striking ``Before''
and inserting ``Upon official''; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (3) in the last sentence, by inserting ``the
planning, design, or'' before ``construction''.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 52 of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1988 (Public Law 100-676; 102 Stat. 4044)
is amended--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) by striking subsection (a) (33 U.S.C. 579a
note);</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) by redesignating subsections (b) through (e)
as subsections (a) through (d), respectively; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (3) in subsection (d) (as so redesignated), by
striking ``or subsection (a) of this section''.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 309. PARTICIPATION IN INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING AND
SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCES.</DELETED>
<DELETED> Section 211 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 (33 U.S.C.
701u) is repealed.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 310. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN SUPPORT OF ARMY CIVIL
WORKS PROGRAM.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (a) In General.--In carrying out research and development
in support of the civil works program of the Department of the Army,
the Secretary may utilize contracts, cooperative research and
development agreements, and cooperative agreements with, and grants to,
non-Federal entities, including State and local governments, colleges
and universities, consortia, professional and technical societies,
public and private scientific and technical foundations, research
institutions, educational organizations, and nonprofit
organizations.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (b) Commercial Application.--In the case of a contract for
research or development, or both, the Secretary may--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) require that the research or development, or
both, have potential commercial application; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) use the potential for commercial application
as an evaluation factor, if appropriate.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 311. INTERAGENCY AND INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT
AUTHORITY.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (a) In General.--The Secretary may engage in activities in
support of other Federal agencies or international organizations to
address problems of national significance to the United States. The
Secretary may engage in activities in support of international
organizations only after consulting with the Secretary of State. The
Secretary may use the technical and managerial expertise of the Army
Corps of Engineers to address domestic and international problems
related to water resources, infrastructure development, and
environmental protection.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (b) Funding.--There are authorized to be appropriated
$1,000,000 to carry out this section. The Secretary may accept and
expend additional funds from other Federal agencies or international
organizations to carry this section.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 312. EXPANSION OF SECTION 1135 PROGRAM.</DELETED>
<DELETED> Section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a) is amended--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) in subsection (a), by inserting before the
period at the end the following: ``and to determine if the
operation of the projects has contributed to the degradation of
the quality of the environment'';</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) in subsection (b), by striking the last two
sentences;</DELETED>
<DELETED> (3) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), and (e)
as subsections (e), (f), and (g), respectively; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (4) by inserting after subsection (b) the
following new subsections:</DELETED>
<DELETED> ``(c) Measures To Restore Environmental Quality.--If the
Secretary determines under subsection (a) that operation of a water
resources project has contributed to the degradation of the quality of
the environment, the Secretary may carry out, with respect to the
project, measures for the restoration of environmental quality, if the
measures are feasible and consistent with the authorized purposes of
the project.</DELETED>
<DELETED> ``(d) Funding.--The non-Federal share of the cost of any
modification or measure carried out pursuant to subsection (b) or (c)
shall be 25 percent. Not more than $5,000,000 in Federal funds may be
expended on any 1 such modification or measure.''.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 313. ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING.</DELETED>
<DELETED> Section 312 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990
(Public Law 101-640; 33 U.S.C. 1252 note) is amended by striking
subsection (f).</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 314. FEASIBILITY STUDIES.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (a) Non-Federal Share.--Section 105(a)(1) of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215(a)(1)) is amended--
</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``during
the period of such study'';</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) by inserting after the first sentence the
following: ``During the period of the study, the non-Federal
share of the cost of the study shall be not more than 50
percent of the estimate of the cost of the study as contained
in the feasibility cost sharing agreement. The cost estimate
may be amended only by mutual agreement of the Secretary and
the non-Federal interests. The non-Federal share of any costs
in excess of the cost estimate shall, except as otherwise
mutually agreed by the Secretary and the non-Federal interests,
be payable after the project has been authorized for
construction and on the date on which the Secretary and non-
Federal interests enter into an agreement pursuant to section
101(e) or 103(j).''; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (3) in the last sentence, by striking ``such non-
Federal contribution'' and inserting ``the non-Federal share
required under this paragraph''.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (b) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsection (a)
shall apply notwithstanding any feasibility cost sharing agreement
entered into by the Secretary and non-Federal interests, and the
Secretary shall amend any feasibility cost sharing agreements in effect
on the date of enactment of this Act so as to conform the agreements
with the amendments. Nothing in this section or any amendment made by
this section shall require the Secretary to reimburse the non-Federal
interests for funds previously contributed for a study.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 315. OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL REQUIREMENT.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (a) Penalty.--Section 16 of the Act entitled ``An Act
making appropriations for the construction, repair, and preservation of
certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'',
approved March 3, 1899 (commonly referred to as the ``River and Harbor
Act of 1899'') (33 U.S.C. 411), is amended--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) by striking ``sections thirteen, fourteen, and
fifteen'' and inserting ``section 13, 14, 15, 19, or 20'';
and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) by striking ``not exceeding twenty-five
hundred dollars nor less than five hundred dollars'' and
inserting ``of not more than $25,000 for each day that the
violation continues''.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (b) General Authority.--Section 20 of the Act (33 U.S.C.
415) is amended--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) in subsection (a)--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (A) by striking ``Under emergency'' and
inserting ``Summary Removal Procedures.--Under
emergency''; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (B) by striking ``expense'' the first
place it appears and inserting ``actual expense,
including administrative expenses,'';</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) in subsection (b)--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (A) by striking ``cost'' and inserting
``actual cost, including administrative costs,'';
and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (B) by striking ``(b) The'' and inserting
``(c) Liability of Owner, Lessee, or Operator.--The'';
and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (3) by inserting after subsection (a) the
following:</DELETED>
<DELETED> ``(b) Removal Requirement.--Not later than 24 hours after
the Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating
issues an order to stop or delay navigation in any navigable waters of
the United States because of conditions related to the sinking or
grounding of a vessel, the owner or operator of the vessel, with the
approval of the Secretary of the Army, shall begin removal of the
vessel using the most expeditious removal method available or, if
appropriate, secure the vessel pending removal to allow navigation to
resume. If the owner or operator fails to begin removal or to secure
the vessel pending removal in accordance with the preceding sentence or
fails to complete removal as soon as possible, the Secretary of the
Army shall remove or destroy the vessel using the summary removal
procedures under subsection (a).''.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 316. LEVEE OWNERS MANUAL.</DELETED>
<DELETED> Section 5 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the
construction of certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood
control, and for other purposes'', approved August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C.
701n), is amended by adding at the end the following:</DELETED>
<DELETED> ``(c) Levee Owners Manual.--</DELETED>
<DELETED> ``(1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the
date of enactment of this subsection, in accordance with
chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code, the Secretary shall
prepare a manual describing the maintenance and upkeep
responsibilities that the Army Corps of Engineers requires of a
non-Federal interest in order for the non-Federal interest to
receive Federal assistance under this section. The Secretary
shall provide a copy of the manual at no cost to each non-
Federal interest that is eligible to receive Federal assistance
under this section.</DELETED>
<DELETED> ``(2) Prohibition on delegation.--The preparation
of the manual shall be carried out under the personal direction
of the Secretary.</DELETED>
<DELETED> ``(3) Authorization of appropriations.--There are
authorized to be appropriated $1,000,000 to carry out this
subsection.</DELETED>
<DELETED> ``(4) Definitions.--In this subsection:</DELETED>
<DELETED> ``(A) Maintenance and upkeep.--The term
`maintenance and upkeep' means all maintenance and
general upkeep of a levee performed on a regular and
consistent basis that is not repair and
rehabilitation.</DELETED>
<DELETED> ``(B) Repair and rehabilitation.--The term
`repair and rehabilitation'--</DELETED>
<DELETED> ``(i) except as provided in clause
(ii), means the repair or rebuilding of a levee
or other flood control structure, after the
structure has been damaged by a flood, to the
level of protection provided by the structure
before the flood; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> ``(ii) does not include--
</DELETED>
<DELETED> ``(I) any improvement to
the structure; or</DELETED>
<DELETED> ``(II) repair or
rebuilding described in clause (i) if,
in the normal course of usage, the
structure becomes structurally unsound
and is no longer fit to provide the
level of protection for which the
structure was designed.</DELETED>
<DELETED> ``(C) Secretary.--The term `Secretary'
means the Secretary of the Army.''.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 317. RISK-BASED ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (a) In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall obtain the services of an
independent consultant to evaluate--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) the relationship between--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (A) the Risk-Based Analysis for Evaluation
of Hydrology/Hydraulics and Economics in Flood Damage
Reduction Studies established in an Army Corps of
Engineers engineering circular; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (B) minimum engineering and safety
standards;</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) the validity of results generated by the
studies described in paragraph (1); and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (3) policy impacts related to change in the
studies described in paragraph (1).</DELETED>
<DELETED> (b) Task Force.--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) In general.--In carrying out the independent
evaluation under subsection (a), the Secretary, not later than
90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, shall
establish a task force to oversee and review the
analysis.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) Membership.--The task force shall consist of--
</DELETED>
<DELETED> (A) the Assistant Secretary of the Army
having responsibility for civil works, who shall serve
as chairperson of the task force;</DELETED>
<DELETED> (B) the Administrator of the Federal
Emergency Management Agency;</DELETED>
<DELETED> (C) the Chief of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service of the Department of
Agriculture;</DELETED>
<DELETED> (D) a State representative appointed by
the Secretary from among individuals recommended by the
Association of State Floodplain Managers;</DELETED>
<DELETED> (E) a local government public works
official appointed by the Secretary from among
individuals recommended by a national organization
representing public works officials; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (F) an individual from the private sector,
who shall be appointed by the Secretary.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (3) Compensation.--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (A) In general.--Except as provided in
subparagraph (B), a member of the task force shall
serve without compensation.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (B) Expenses.--Each member of the task
force shall be allowed--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (i) travel expenses, including per
diem in lieu of subsistence, at rates
authorized for employees of agencies under
subchapter I of chapter 57 of title 5, United
States Code, while away from the home or
regular place of business of the member in the
performance of services for the task force;
and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (ii) other expenses incurred in
the performance of services for the task force,
as determined by the Secretary.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (4) Termination.--The task force shall terminate 2
years after the date of enactment of this Act.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (c) Limitation on Use of Methodology.--During the period
beginning on the date of enactment of this Act and ending 2 years after
that date, if requested by a non-Federal interest, the Secretary shall
refrain from using any risk-based technique required under the studies
described in subsection (a) for the evaluation and design of a project
carried out in cooperation with the non-Federal interest unless the
Secretary, in consultation with the task force, has provided direction
for use of the technique after consideration of the independent
evaluation required under subsection (a).</DELETED>
<DELETED> (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized
to be appropriated $500,000 to carry out this section.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 318. SEDIMENTS DECONTAMINATION TECHNOLOGY.</DELETED>
<DELETED> Section 405 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992
(Public Law 102-580; 33 U.S.C. 2239 note) is amended--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) in subsection (a)--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (A) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end
the following: ``The goal of the program shall be to
make possible the development, on a pilot scale, of 1
or more sediment decontamination technologies, each of
which demonstrates a sediment decontamination capacity
of at least 400 cubic yards per day.''; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (B) by adding at the end the
following:</DELETED>
<DELETED> ``(3) Report to congress.--Not later than
September 30, 1996, and September 30 of each year thereafter,
the Administrator and the Secretary shall report to Congress on
progress made toward the goal described in paragraph (2).'';
and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) in subsection (c)--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (A) by striking ``$5,000,000'' and
inserting ``$10,000,000''; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (B) by striking ``1992'' and inserting
``1995''.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 319. MELALEUCA TREE.</DELETED>
<DELETED> Section 104(a) of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (33
U.S.C. 610(a)) is amended by inserting ``melaleuca tree,'' after
``milfoil,''.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 320. FAULKNER ISLAND, CONNECTICUT.</DELETED>
<DELETED> In consultation with the Director of the United States
Fish and Wildlife Service, the Secretary shall design and construct
shoreline protection measures for the coastline adjacent to the
Faulkner Island Lighthouse, Connecticut, at a total cost of
$3,300,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 321. DESIGNATION OF LOCK AND DAM AT THE RED RIVER
WATERWAY, LOUISIANA.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (a) Designation.--Lock and Dam numbered 4 of the Red River
Waterway, Louisiana, is designated as the ``Russell B. Long Lock and
Dam''.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (b) Legal References.--A reference in any law, regulation,
document, map, record, or other paper of the United States to the lock
and dam referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference
to the ``Russell B. Long Lock and Dam''.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 322. JENNINGS RANDOLPH ACCESS ROAD, GARRETT COUNTY,
MARYLAND.</DELETED>
<DELETED> The Secretary shall transfer up to $600,000 from the funds
appropriated for the Jennings Randolph Lake, Maryland and West
Virginia, project to the State of Maryland for use by the State in
constructing an access road to the William Jennings Randolph Lake in
Garrett County, Maryland.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 323. NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (a) In General.--In order to make capital improvements to
the New York State canal system, the Secretary, with the consent of
appropriate local and State entities, shall enter into such
arrangements, contracts, and leases with public and private entities as
may be necessary for the purposes of rehabilitation, renovation,
preservation, and maintenance of the New York State canal system and
related facilities, including trailside facilities and other
recreational projects along the waterways referred to in subsection
(c).</DELETED>
<DELETED> (b) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of
capital improvements under this section shall be 50 percent. The total
cost is $14,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $7,000,000 and
an estimated non-Federal cost of $7,000,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (c) Definition of New York State Canal System.--In this
section, the term ``New York State canal system'' means the Erie,
Oswego, Champlain, and Cayuga-Seneca Canals in New York.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 324. QUONSET POINT-DAVISVILLE, RHODE ISLAND.</DELETED>
<DELETED> The Secretary shall replace the bulkhead between piers 1
and 2 at the Quonset Point-Davisville Industrial Park, Rhode Island, at
a total cost of $1,350,000. The estimated Federal share of the project
cost is $1,012,500, and the estimated non-Federal share of the project
cost is $337,500. In conjunction with this project, the Secretary shall
install high mast lighting at pier 2 at a total cost of $300,000, with
an estimated Federal cost of $225,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost
of $75,000.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 325. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE WASHINGTON
AQUEDUCT.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (a) Authorizations.--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) Authorization of modernization.--Subject to
approval in, and in such amounts as may be provided in
appropriations Acts, the Chief of Engineers of the Army Corps
of Engineers is authorized to modernize the Washington
Aqueduct.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is
authorized to be appropriated to the Army Corps of Engineers
borrowing authority in amounts sufficient to cover the full
costs of modernizing the Washington Aqueduct. The borrowing
authority shall be provided by the Secretary of the Treasury,
under such terms and conditions as are established by the
Secretary of the Treasury, after a series of contracts with
each public water supply customer has been entered into under
subsection (b).</DELETED>
<DELETED> (b) Contracts With Public Water Supply Customers.--
</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) Contracts to repay corps debt.--To the extent
provided in appropriations Acts, and in accordance with
paragraphs (2) and (3), the Chief of Engineers of the Army
Corps of Engineers is authorized to enter into a series of
contracts with each public water supply customer under which
the customer commits to repay a pro-rata share of the principal
and interest owed by the Army Corps of Engineers to the
Secretary of the Treasury under subsection (a). Under each of
the contracts, the customer that enters into the contract shall
commit to pay any additional amount necessary to fully offset
the risk of default on the contract.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) Offsetting of risk of default.--Each contract
under paragraph (1) shall include such additional terms and
conditions as the Secretary of the Treasury may require so that
the value to the Government of the contracts is estimated to be
equal to the obligational authority used by the Army Corps of
Engineers for modernizing the Washington Aqueduct at the time
that each series of contracts is entered into.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (3) Other conditions.--Each contract entered into
under paragraph (1) shall--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (A) provide that the public water supply
customer pledges future income from fees assessed to
operate and maintain the Washington Aqueduct;</DELETED>
<DELETED> (B) provide the United States priority
over all other creditors; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (C) include other conditions that the
Secretary of the Treasury determines to be
appropriate.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (c) Borrowing Authority.--Subject to an appropriation
under subsection (a)(2) and after entering into a series of contracts
under subsection (b), the Secretary, acting through the Chief of
Engineers of the Army Corps of Engineers, shall seek borrowing
authority from the Secretary of the Treasury under subsection
(a)(2).</DELETED>
<DELETED> (d) Definitions.--In this section:</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) Public water supply customer.--The term
``public water supply customer'' means the District of
Columbia, the county of Arlington, Virginia, and the city of
Falls Church, Virginia.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) Value to the government.--The term ``value to
the Government'' means the net present value of a contract
under subsection (b) calculated under the rules set forth in
subparagraphs (A) and (B) of section 502(5) of the
Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 661a(5)), excluding
section 502(5)(B)(i) of the Act, as though the contracts
provided for the repayment of direct loans to the public water
supply customers.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (3) Washington aqueduct.--The term ``Washington
Aqueduct'' means the water supply system of treatment plans,
raw water intakes, conduits, reservoirs, transmission mains,
and pumping stations owned by the Federal Government located in
the metropolitan Washington, District of Columbia,
area.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 326. CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND
PROTECTION PROGRAM.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (a) Establishment.--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) In general.--The Secretary shall establish a
pilot program to provide environmental assistance to non-
Federal interests in the Chesapeake Bay watershed.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) Form.--The assistance shall be in the form of
design and construction assistance for water-related
environmental infrastructure and resource protection and
development projects affecting the Chesapeake Bay estuary,
including projects for sediment and erosion control, protection
of eroding shorelines, protection of essential public works,
wastewater treatment and related facilities, water supply and
related facilities, and beneficial uses of dredged material,
and other related projects that may enhance the living
resources of the estuary.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (b) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may
provide assistance for a project under this section only if the project
is publicly owned, and will be publicly operated and
maintained.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (c) Local Cooperation Agreement.--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) In general.--Before providing assistance under
this section, the Secretary shall enter into a local
cooperation agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide
for design and construction of the project to be carried out
with the assistance.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation
agreement entered into under this subsection shall provide
for--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (A) the development by the Secretary, in
consultation with appropriate Federal, State, and local
officials, of a facilities or resource protection and
development plan, including appropriate engineering
plans and specifications and an estimate of expected
resource benefits; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (B) the establishment of such legal and
institutional structures as are necessary to ensure the
effective long-term operation and maintenance of the
project by the non-Federal interest.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (d) Cost Sharing.--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) Federal share.--Except as provided in
paragraph (2)(B), the Federal share of the total project costs
of each local cooperation agreement entered into under this
section shall be 75 percent.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) Non-federal share.--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (A) Value of lands, easements, rights-of-
way, and relocations.--In determining the non-Federal
contribution toward carrying out a local cooperation
agreement entered into under this section, the
Secretary shall provide credit to a non-Federal
interest for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-
way, and relocations provided by the non-Federal
interest, except that the amount of credit provided for
a project under this paragraph may not exceed 25
percent of the total project costs.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (B) Operation and maintenance costs.--The
non-Federal share of the costs of operation and
maintenance of carrying out the agreement under this
section shall be 100 percent.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (e) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws and
Agreements.--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (1) In general.--Nothing in this section waives,
limits, or otherwise affects the applicability of any provision
of Federal or State law that would otherwise apply to a project
carried out with assistance provided under this
section.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (2) Cooperation.--In carrying out this section,
the Secretary shall cooperate fully with the heads of
appropriate Federal agencies, including--</DELETED>
<DELETED> (A) the Administrator of the Environmental
Protection Agency;</DELETED>
<DELETED> (B) the Secretary of Commerce, acting
through the Administrator of the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration;</DELETED>
<DELETED> (C) the Secretary of the Interior, acting
through the Director of the United States Fish and
Wildlife Service; and</DELETED>
<DELETED> (D) the heads of such other Federal
agencies and agencies of a State or political
subdivision of a State as the Secretary determines to
be appropriate.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (f) Demonstration Project.--The Secretary shall establish
at least 1 project under this section in each of the States of
Maryland, Virginia, and Pennsylvania. A project established under this
section shall be carried out using such measures as are necessary to
protect environmental, historic, and cultural resources.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (g) Report.--Not later than December 31, 1998, the
Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the results of the
program carried out under this section, together with a recommendation
concerning whether or not the program should be implemented on a
national basis.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized
to be appropriated to carry out this section $30,000,000 for fiscal
year 1996, to remain available until expended.</DELETED>
<DELETED>SEC. 327. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (a) Contributions for Environmental and Recreation
Projects.--Section 203(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of
1992 (33 U.S.C. 2325(b)) is amended by striking ``(8662)'' and
inserting ``(8862)''.</DELETED>
<DELETED> (b) Challenge Cost-Sharing Program.--The second sentence
of section 225(c) of the Act (33 U.S.C. 2328(c)) is amended by striking
``(8662)'' and inserting ``(8862)''.</DELETED>
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.
(a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water Resources
Development Act of 1995''.
(b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents of this Act is as
follows:
Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Definition of Secretary.
TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS
Sec. 101. Project authorizations.
Sec. 102. Project modifications.
Sec. 103. Project deauthorizations.
Sec. 104. Studies.
TITLE II--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS
Sec. 201. Heber Springs, Arkansas.
Sec. 202. Morgan Point, Arkansas.
Sec. 203. White River Basin Lakes, Arkansas and Missouri.
Sec. 204. Central and southern Florida.
Sec. 205. West Palm Beach, Florida.
Sec. 206. Periodic maintenance dredging for Greenville Inner Harbor
Channel, Mississippi.
Sec. 207. Sardis Lake, Mississippi.
Sec. 208. Libby Dam, Montana.
Sec. 209. Small flood control project, Malta, Montana.
Sec. 210. Cliffwood Beach, New Jersey.
Sec. 211. Fire Island Inlet, New York.
Sec. 212. Buford Trenton Irrigation District, North Dakota and Montana.
Sec. 213. Wister Lake project, LeFlore County, Oklahoma.
Sec. 214. Willamette River, McKenzie Subbasin, Oregon.
Sec. 215. Abandoned and wrecked barge removal, Rhode Island.
Sec. 216. Providence River and Harbor, Rhode Island.
Sec. 217. Cooper Lake and Channels, Texas.
Sec. 218. Rudee Inlet, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
Sec. 219. Virginia Beach, Virginia.
TITLE III--GENERAL PROVISIONS
Sec. 301. Cost-sharing for environmental projects.
Sec. 302. Collaborative research and development.
Sec. 303. National inventory of dams.
Sec. 304. Hydroelectric power project uprating.
Sec. 305. Federal lump-sum payments for Federal operation and
maintenance costs.
Sec. 306. Cost-sharing for removal of existing project features.
Sec. 307. Termination of technical advisory committee.
Sec. 308. Conditions for project deauthorizations.
Sec. 309. Participation in international engineering and scientific
conferences.
Sec. 310. Research and development in support of Army civil works
program.
Sec. 311. Interagency and international support authority.
Sec. 312. Section 1135 program.
Sec. 313. Environmental dredging.
Sec. 314. Feasibility studies.
Sec. 315. Obstruction removal requirement.
Sec. 316. Levee owners manual.
Sec. 317. Risk-based analysis methodology.
Sec. 318. Sediments decontamination technology.
Sec. 319. Melaleuca tree.
Sec. 320. Faulkner Island, Connecticut.
Sec. 321. Designation of lock and dam at the Red River Waterway,
Louisiana.
Sec. 322. Jurisdiction of Mississippi River Commission, Louisiana.
Sec. 323. William Jennings Randolph access road, Garrett County,
Maryland.
Sec. 324. Arkabutla Dam and Lake, Mississippi.
Sec. 325. New York State canal system.
Sec. 326. Quonset Point-Davisville, Rhode Island.
Sec. 327. Clouter Creek disposal area, Charleston, South Carolina.
Sec. 328. Nuisance aquatic vegetation in Lake Gaston, Virginia and
North Carolina.
Sec. 329. Capital improvements for the Washington Aqueduct.
Sec. 330. Chesapeake Bay environmental restoration and protection
program.
Sec. 331. Research and development program to improve salmon survival.
Sec. 332. Recreational user fees.
Sec. 333. Shoreline erosion control demonstration.
Sec. 334. Technical corrections.
SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SECRETARY.
In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the
Army.
TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS
SEC. 101. PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.
Except as otherwise provided in this section, the following
projects for water resources development and conservation and other
purposes are authorized to be carried out by the Secretary
substantially in accordance with the plans, and subject to the
conditions, recommended in the respective reports designated in this
section:
(1) Marin county shoreline, san rafael canal, california.--
The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Marin
County Shoreline, San Rafael Canal, California: Report of the
Chief of Engineers, dated January 28, 1994, at a total cost of
$27,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $17,700,000 and
an estimated non-Federal cost of $9,500,000.
(2) San lorenzo river, california.--The project for flood
control, San Lorenzo River, California: Report of the Chief of
Engineers, dated June 30, 1994, at a total cost of $16,100,000,
with an estimated Federal cost of $8,100,000 and an estimated
non-Federal cost of $8,000,000 and the habitat restoration, at
a total cost of $4,050,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
$3,040,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $1,010,000.
(3) Santa barbara harbor, santa barbara county,
california.--The project for navigation, Santa Barbara Harbor,
Santa Barbara, California: Report of the Chief of Engineers,
dated April 26, 1994, at a total cost of $5,720,000, with an
estimated Federal cost of $4,580,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $1,140,000.
(4) Palm valley bridge replacement, st. johns county,
florida.--The project for navigation, Palm Valley Bridge,
County Road 210, over the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway in St.
Johns County, Florida: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated
June 24, 1994, at a total Federal cost of $15,312,000. As a
condition of receipt of Federal funds, St. Johns County shall
assume full ownership of the replacement bridge, including all
associated operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, and
rehabilitation costs.
(5) Illinois shoreline erosion, interim iii, wilmette to
illinois and indiana state line.--The project for storm damage
reduction and shoreline erosion protection from Wilmette,
Illinois, to the Illinois and Indiana State line: Report of the
Chief of Engineers, dated April 14, 1994, at a total cost of
$204,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $110,000,000
and an estimated non-Federal cost of $94,000,000, and the
breakwater near the South Water Filtration Plant, a separable
element of the project at a total cost of $8,539,000, with an
estimated Federal cost of $5,550,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $2,989,000. The operation, maintenance, repair,
replacement, and rehabilitation of the project after
construction shall be the responsibility of the non-Federal
interests.
(6) Kentucky lock addition, kentucky.--The project for
navigation, Kentucky Lock Addition, Kentucky: Report of the
Chief of Engineers, dated June 1, 1992, at a total cost of
$467,000,000. The construction costs of the project shall be
paid--
(A) 50 percent from amounts appropriated from the
general fund of the Treasury; and
(B) 50 percent from amounts appropriated from the
Inland Waterways Trust Fund established by section 9506
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
(7) Wolf creek hydropower, cumberland river, kentucky.--The
project for hydropower, Wolf Creek Dam and Lake Cumberland,
Kentucky: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 28,
1994, at a total cost of $50,230,000. Funds derived by the
Tennessee Valley Authority from the power program of the
Authority and funds derived from any private or public entity
designated by the Southeastern Power Administration may be used
for all or part of any cost-sharing requirements for the project.
(8) Port fourchon, louisiana.--The project for navigation,
Port Fourchon, Louisiana: Report of the Chief of Engineers,
dated April 7, 1995, at a total cost of $2,812,000, with an
estimated Federal cost of $2,211,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $601,000.
(9) West bank hurricane protection levee, jefferson parish,
louisiana.--The West Bank Hurricane Protection Levee, Jefferson
Parish, Louisiana project, authorized by section 401(b) of the
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100
Stat. 4128), is modified to authorize the Secretary to extend
protection to areas east of the Harvey Canal, including an area
east of the Algiers Canal: Report of the Chief of Engineers,
dated May 1, 1995, at a total cost of $217,000,000, with an
estimated Federal cost of $141,400,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $75,600,000.
(10) Stabilization of natchez bluffs, mississippi.--The
project for bluff stabilization, Natchez Bluffs, Natchez,
Mississippi: Natchez Bluffs Study, dated September 1985,
Natchez Bluffs Study: Supplement I, dated June 1990, and
Natchez Bluffs Study: Supplement II, dated December 1993, in
the portions of the bluffs described in the reports designated
in this paragraph as Clifton Avenue, area 3; Bluff above Silver
Street, area 6; Bluff above Natchez Under-the-Hill, area 7; and
Madison Street to State Street, area 4, at a total cost of
$17,200,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $12,900,000 and
an estimated non-Federal cost of $4,300,000.
(11) Wood river at grand island, nebraska.--The project for
flood control, Wood River at Grand Island, Nebraska: Report of
the Chief of Engineers, dated May 3, 1994, at a total cost of
$10,500,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $5,250,000 and
an estimated non-Federal cost of $5,250,000.
(12) Wilmington harbor, cape fear-northeast cape fear
rivers, north carolina.--The project for navigation, Wilmington
Harbor, Cape Fear-Northeast Cape Fear Rivers, North Carolina:
Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 24, 1994, at a
total cost of $23,290,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
$16,955,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $6,335,000.
(13) Duck creek, ohio.--The project for flood control, Duck
Creek, Cincinnati, Ohio: Report of the Chief of Engineers,
dated June 28, 1994, at a total cost of $15,408,000, with an
estimated Federal cost of $11,556,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $3,852,000.
(14) Pond creek, ohio.--The project for flood control, Pond
Creek, Ohio: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 28,
1994, at a total cost of $16,865,000, with an estimated Federal
cost of $11,243,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
$5,622,000.
(15) Coos bay, oregon.--The project for navigation, Coos
Bay, Oregon: Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated June 30,
1994, at a total cost of $14,541,000, with an estimated Federal
cost of $10,777,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
$3,764,000.
(16) Big sioux river and skunk creek at sioux falls, south
dakota.--The project for flood control, Big Sioux River and
Skunk Creek at Sioux Falls, South Dakota: Report of the Chief
of Engineers, dated June 30, 1994, at a total cost of
$31,600,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $23,600,000 and
an estimated non-Federal cost of $8,000,000.
(17) Atlantic intracoastal waterway bridge replacement at
great bridge, chesapeake, virginia.--The project for navigation
at Great Bridge, Virginia Highway 168, over the Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway in Chesapeake, Virginia: Report of the
Chief of Engineers, dated July 1, 1994, at a total cost of
$23,680,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $20,341,000 and
an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,339,000. The city of
Chesapeake shall assume full ownership of the replacement
bridge, including all associated operation, maintenance,
repair, replacement, and rehabilitation costs.
(18) Marmet lock replacement, kanawha river, west
virginia.--The project for navigation, Marmet Lock Replacement,
Marmet Locks and Dam, Kanawha River, West Virginia: Report of
the Chief of Engineers, dated June 24, 1994, at a total cost of
$257,900,000. The construction costs of the project shall be
paid--
(A) 50 percent from amounts appropriated from the
general fund of the Treasury; and
(B) 50 percent from amounts appropriated from the
Inland Waterways Trust Fund established by section 9506
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
SEC. 102. PROJECT MODIFICATIONS.
(a) Oakland Harbor, California.--The projects for navigation,
Oakland Outer Harbor, California, and Oakland Inner Harbor, California,
authorized by section 202(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of
1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4092), are modified to combine the 2
projects into 1 project, to be designated as the Oakland Harbor,
California, project. The Oakland Harbor, California, project shall be
carried out by the Secretary substantially in accordance with the plans
and subject to the conditions recommended in the reports designated for
the projects in the section, except that the non-Federal share of
project cost and any available credits toward the non-Federal share
shall be calculated on the basis of the total cost of the combined
project. The total cost of the combined project is $102,600,000, with
an estimated Federal cost of $64,120,000 and an estimated non-Federal
cost of $38,480,000.
(b) Broward County, Florida.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary shall provide periodic beach
nourishment for the Broward County, Florida, Hillsborough Inlet
to Port Everglades (Segment II), shore protection project,
authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965
(Public Law 89-298; 79 Stat. 1090), through the year 2020. The
beach nourishment shall be carried out in accordance with the
recommendations of the section 934 study and reevaluation
report for the project carried out under section 156 of the
Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5f)
and approved by the Chief of Engineers by memorandum dated June
9, 1995.
(2) Costs.--The total cost of the activities required under
this subsection shall not exceed $15,457,000, of which the
Federal share shall not exceed $9,846,000.
(c) Canaveral Harbor, Florida.--The project for navigation,
Canaveral Harbor, Florida, authorized by section 101(7) of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-580; 106 Stat. 4802),
is modified to authorize the Secretary to reclassify the removal and
replacement of stone protection on both sides of the channel as general
navigation features of the project subject to cost sharing in
accordance with section 101(a) of the Water Resources Development Act
of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211(a)). The Secretary may reimburse the non-
Federal interests for such costs incurred by the non-Federal interests
in connection with the removal and replacement as the Secretary
determines are in excess of the non-Federal share of the costs of the
project required under the section.
(d) Fort Pierce, Florida.--The Secretary shall provide periodic
beach nourishment for the Fort Pierce beach erosion control project,
St. Lucie County, Florida, authorized by section 301 of the River and
Harbor Act of 1965 (Public Law 89-298; 79 Stat. 1092), through the year
2020.
(e) North Branch of Chicago River, Illinois.--The project for flood
control for the North Branch of the Chicago River, Illinois, authorized
by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986
(Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4115), is modified to authorize the
Secretary to carry out the project substantially in accordance with the
post authorization change report for the project dated March 1994, at a
total cost of $34,800,000, with an estimated Federal cost of
$20,774,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $14,026,000.
(f) Arkansas City, Kansas.--The project for flood control, Arkansas
City, Kansas, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4116), is
modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project
substantially in accordance with the post authorization change report
for the project dated June 1994, at a total cost of $35,700,000, with
an estimated Federal cost of $26,600,000 and an estimated non-Federal
cost of $9,100,000.
(g) Halstead, Kansas.--The project for flood control, Halstead,
Kansas, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development
Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4116), is modified to
authorize the Secretary to construct the project substantially in
accordance with the post authorization change report for the project
dated March 1993, at a total cost of $11,100,000, with an estimated
Federal cost of $8,325,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
$2,775,000.
(h) Baptiste Collette Bayou, Louisiana.--The project for
navigation, Mississippi River Outlets, Venice, Louisiana, authorized by
section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (Public Law 90-483; 82
Stat. 731), is modified to provide for the extension of the 16-foot
deep (mean low gulf) by 250-foot wide Baptiste Collette Bayou entrance
channel to approximately mile 8 of the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet
navigation channel at a total estimated Federal cost of $80,000,
including $4,000 for surveys and $76,000 for Coast Guard aids to
navigation.
(i) Manistique Harbor, Michigan.--
(1) Sand and stone cap.--The project for navigation,
Manistique Harbor, Schoolcraft County, Michigan, authorized by
the first section of the Act entitled ``An Act making
appropriations for the construction, repair, and preservation
of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other
purposes'', approved March 3, 1905 (33 Stat. 1136), is modified
to permit installation of a sand and stone cap over sediments
affected by polychlorinated biphenyls, in accordance with an
administrative order of the Environmental Protection Agency.
(2) Project depth.--
(A) In general.--Except as provided in subparagraph
(B), the project described in paragraph (1) is modified
to provide for an authorized depth of 18 feet.
(B) Exception.--The authorized depth shall be 12.5
feet in the areas where the sand and stone cap
described in paragraph (1) will be placed within the
following coordinates: 4220N-2800E to 4220N-3110E to
3980N-3260E to 3190N-3040E to 2960N-2560E to 3150N-
2300E to 3680N-2510E to 3820N-2690E and back to 4220N-
2800E.
(3) Harbor of refuge.--The project described in paragraph
(1), including the breakwalls, pier, and authorized depth of
the project (as modified by paragraph (2)), shall continue to
be maintained as a harbor of refuge.
(j) Stillwater, Minnesota.--Not later than 1 year after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall prepare a design memorandum
for the project authorized by section 363 of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-580; 106 Stat. 4861) for the
purpose of evaluating the Federal interest in construction of the
project for flood control and determining the most feasible
alternative. If the Secretary determines that there is such a Federal
interest, the Secretary shall construct the most feasible alternative
at a total cost of not to exceed $11,600,000. The Federal share of the
cost shall be 75 percent.
(k) Cape Girardeau, Missouri.--The project for flood control, Cape
Girardeau, Jackson Metropolitan Area, Missouri, authorized by section
401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-
662; 100 Stat. 4118-4119), is modified to authorize the Secretary to
carry out the project, including the implementation of nonstructural
measures, at a total cost of $44,700,000, with an estimated Federal
cost of $32,600,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $12,100,000.
(l) Wilmington Harbor-Northeast Cape Fear River, North Carolina.--
The project for navigation, Wilmington Harbor-Northeast Cape Fear
River, North Carolina, authorized by section 202(a) of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4095),
is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project
substantially in accordance with the general design memorandum for the
project dated April 1990 and the general design memorandum supplement
for the project dated February 1994, at a total cost of $50,921,000,
with an estimated Federal cost of $25,128,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $25,793,000.
(m) Saw Mill Run, Pennsylvania.--The project for flood control, Saw
Mill Run, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, authorized by section 401(a) of the
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat.
4124), is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry out the project
substantially in accordance with the post authorization change and
general reevaluation report for the project, dated April 1994, at a
total cost of $12,780,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $9,585,000
and an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,195,000.
(n) Allendale Dam, North Providence, Rhode Island.--The project for
reconstruction of the Allendale Dam, North Providence, Rhode Island,
authorized by section 358 of the Water Resources Development Act of
1992 (Public Law 102-580; 106 Stat. 4861), is modified to authorize the
Secretary to reconstruct the dam, at a total cost of $350,000, with an
estimated Federal cost of $262,500 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
$87,500.
(o) India Point Bridge, Seekonk River, Providence, Rhode Island.--
The project for the removal and demolition of the India Point Railroad
Bridge, Seekonk River, Rhode Island, authorized by section 1166(c) of
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100
Stat. 4258), is modified to authorize the Secretary to demolish and
remove the center span of the bridge, at a total cost of $1,300,000,
with an estimated Federal cost of $650,000, and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $650,000.
(p) Dallas Floodway Extension, Dallas, Texas.--
(1) In general.--The project for flood control, Dallas
Floodway Extension, Dallas, Texas, authorized by section 301 of
the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (Public Law 89-298; 79 Stat.
1091), is modified to provide that, notwithstanding the last
sentence of section 104(c) of the Water Resources Development
Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2214(c)), the Secretary shall credit the
cost of work performed by the non-Federal interests in
constructing flood protection works for Rochester Park and the
Central Wastewater Treatment Plant against the non-Federal
share of the cost of the project or any revision of the
project.
(2) Determination of amount.--The amount to be credited
under paragraph (1) shall be determined by the Secretary. In
determining the amount, the Secretary shall include only the
costs of such work performed by the non-Federal interests as
is--
(A) compatible with the project described in
paragraph (1) or any revision of the project; or
(B) required for construction of the project or any
revision of the project.
(3) Cash contribution.--Nothing in this subsection limits
the applicability of the requirement specified in section
103(a)(1)(A) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33
U.S.C. 2213(a)(1)(A)) to the project described in paragraph
(1).
(q) Matagorda Ship Channel, Port Lavaca, Texas.--The project for
navigation, Matagorda Ship Channel, Port Lavaca, Texas, authorized by
section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (Public Law 85-500; 72
Stat. 298), is modified to require the Secretary to assume
responsibility for the maintenance of the Point Comfort Turning Basin
Expansion Area to a depth of 36 feet, as constructed by the non-Federal
interests. The modification described in the preceding sentence shall
be considered to be in the public interest and to be economically
justified.
(r) Upper Jordan River, Utah.--The project for flood control, Upper
Jordan River, Utah, authorized by section 101(a)(23) of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-640; 104 Stat. 4610),
is modified to authorize the Secretary to carry out the project
substantially in accordance with the general design memorandum for the
project dated March 1994, and the post authorization change report for
the project dated April 1994, at a total cost of $12,370,000, with an
estimated Federal cost of $8,220,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost
of $4,150,000.
(s) Grundy, Virginia.--The Secretary shall proceed with planning,
engineering, design, and construction of the Grundy, Virginia, element
of the Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big Sandy River and Upper Cumberland
River project, authorized by section 202 of the Energy and Water
Development Appropriation Act, 1981 (Public Law 96-367; 94 Stat. 1339),
in accordance with Plan 3A as set forth in the preliminary draft
detailed project report of the Huntington District Commander, dated
August 1993.
(t) Haysi Lake, Virginia and Kentucky.--The Secretary shall
expedite completion of the flood damage reduction plan for the Levisa
Fork Basin in Virginia and Kentucky, authorized by section 202 of the
Energy and Water Development Appropriation Act, 1981 (Public Law 96-
367; 94 Stat. 1339), in a manner that is consistent with the Haysi Lake
component of the plan for flood control and associated water resource
features identified by the non-Federal interests.
(u) Petersburg, West Virginia.--The project for flood control,
Petersburg, West Virginia, authorized by section 101(a)(26) of the
Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (Public Law 101-640; 104 Stat.
4611), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the project
at a total cost of not to exceed $26,600,000, with an estimated Federal
cost of $19,195,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $7,405,000.
(v) Teton County, Wyoming.--Section 840 of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4176) is
amended--
(1) by striking ``Secretary: Provided, That'' and inserting
the following: ``Secretary. In carrying out this section, the
Secretary may enter into agreements with the non-Federal
sponsors permitting the non-Federal sponsors to perform
operation and maintenance for the project on a cost-
reimbursable basis. The'';
(2) by inserting ``, through providing in-kind services
or'' after ``$35,000''; and
(3) by inserting a comma after ``materials''.
SEC. 103. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.
(a) Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut.--
(1) Anchorage area.--The portion of the project for
navigation, Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by
section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (Public Law 85-
500; 72 Stat. 297), consisting of a 2-acre anchorage area with
a depth of 6 feet at the head of Johnsons River between the
Federal channel and Hollisters Dam, is deauthorized.
(2) Johnsons river channel.--The portion of the project for
navigation, Johnsons River Channel, Bridgeport Harbor,
Connecticut, authorized by the first section of the Act
entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction, repair, and
preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and
for other purposes'', approved July 24, 1946 (60 Stat. 634),
that is northerly of a line across the Federal channel the
coordinates of which are north 123318.35, east 486301.68, and
north 123257.15, east 486380.77, is deauthorized.
(b) Guilford Harbor, Connecticut.--
(1) In general.--The portion of the project for navigation,
Guilford Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the Act entitled
``An Act authorizing the construction, repair, and preservation
of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other
purposes'', approved March 2, 1945 (59 Stat. 13), that consists
of the 6-foot deep channel in Sluice Creek and that is not
included in the description of the realigned channel set forth
in paragraph (2) is deauthorized.
(2) Description of realigned channel.--The realigned
channel referred to in paragraph (1) is described as follows:
starting at a point where the Sluice Creek Channel intersects
with the main entrance channel, N159194.63, E623201.07, thence
running north 24 degrees, 58 minutes, 15.2 seconds west 478.40
feet to a point N159628.31, E622999.11, thence running north 20
degrees, 18 minutes, 31.7 seconds west 351.53 feet to a point
N159957.99, E622877.10, thence running north 69 degrees, 41
minutes, 37.9 seconds east 55.00 feet to a point N159977.08,
E622928.69, thence turning and running south 20 degrees, 18
minutes, 31.0 seconds east 349.35 feet to a point N159649.45,
E623049.94, thence turning and running south 24 degrees, 58
minutes, 11.1 seconds east 341.36 feet to a point N159340.00,
E623194.04, thence turning and running south 90 degrees, 0
minutes, 0 seconds east 78.86 feet to a point N159340.00,
E623272.90.
(c) Norwalk Harbor, Connecticut.--
(1) In general.--The following portions of projects for
navigation, Norwalk Harbor, Connecticut, are deauthorized:
(A) The portion authorized by the Act entitled ``An
Act making appropriations for the construction, repair,
and preservation of certain public works on rivers and
harbors, and for other purposes'', approved March 2,
1919 (40 Stat. 1276), that lies northerly of a line
across the Federal channel having coordinates
N104199.72, E417774.12 and N104155.59, E417628.96.
(B) The portions of the 6-foot deep East Norwalk
Channel and Anchorage, authorized by the Act entitled
``An Act authorizing the construction, repair, and
preservation of certain public works on rivers and
harbors, and for other purposes'', approved March 2,
1945 (59 Stat. 13), that are not included in the
description of the realigned channel and anchorage set
forth in paragraph (2).
(2) Description of realigned channel and anchorage.--The
realigned 6-foot deep East Norwalk Channel and Anchorage
referred to in paragraph (1)(B) is described as follows:
starting at a point on the East Norwalk Channel, N95743.02,
E419581.37, thence running northwesterly about 463.96 feet to a
point N96197.93, E419490.18, thence running northwesterly about
549.32 feet to a point N96608.49, E419125.23, thence running
northwesterly about 384.06 feet to a point N96965.94,
E418984.75, thence running northwesterly about 407.26 feet to a
point N97353.87, E418860.78, thence running westerly about
58.26 feet to a point N97336.26, E418805.24, thence running
northwesterly about 70.99 feet to a point N97390.30,
E418759.21, thence running westerly about 71.78 feet to a point
on the anchorage limit N97405.26, E418689.01, thence running
southerly along the western limits of the Federal anchorage in
existence on the date of enactment of this Act until reaching a
point N95893.74, E419449.17, thence running in a southwesterly
direction about 78.74 feet to a point on the East Norwalk
Channel N95815.62, E419439.33.
(3) Designation of realigned channel and anchorage.--All of
the realigned channel shall be redesignated as an anchorage,
with the exception of the portion of the channel that narrows
to a width of 100 feet and terminates at a line the coordinates
of which are N96456.81, E419260.06 and N96390.37, E419185.32,
which shall remain as a channel.
(d) Southport Harbor, Connecticut.--
(1) In general.--The following portions of the project for
navigation, Southport Harbor, Connecticut, authorized by the
first section of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the
construction, repair, and preservation of certain public works
on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', approved
August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 1029), are deauthorized:
(A) The 6-foot deep anchorage located at the head
of the project.
(B) The portion of the 9-foot deep channel
beginning at a bend in the channel the coordinates of
which are north 109131.16, east 452653.32, running
thence in a northeasterly direction about 943.01 feet
to a point the coordinates of which are north
109635.22, east 453450.31, running thence in a
southeasterly direction about 22.66 feet to a point the
coordinates of which are north 109617.15, east
453463.98, running thence in a southwesterly direction
about 945.18 feet to the point of beginning.
(2) Remainder.--The portion of the project referred to in
paragraph (1) that is remaining after the deauthorization made
by the paragraph and that is northerly of a line the
coordinates of which are north 108699.15, east 452768.36, and
north 108655.66, east 452858.73, is redesignated as an
anchorage.
(e) East Boothbay Harbor, Maine.--The following portion of the
navigation project for East Boothbay Harbor, Maine, authorized by the
first section of the Act of June 25, 1910 (36 Stat. 631, chapter 382)
(commonly referred to as the ``River and Harbor Act of 1910''),
containing approximately 1.15 acres and described in accordance with
the Maine State Coordinate System, West Zone, is deauthorized:
Beginning at a point noted as point number 6 and shown as
having plan coordinates of North 9, 722, East 9, 909 on the
plan entitled, ``East Boothbay Harbor, Maine, examination, 8-
foot area'', and dated August 9, 1955, Drawing Number F1251 D-
6-2, said point having Maine State Coordinate System, West Zone
coordinates of Northing 74514, Easting 698381; and
Thence, North 58 degrees, 12 minutes, 30 seconds East a
distance of 120.9 feet to a point; and
Thence, South 72 degrees, 21 minutes, 50 seconds East a
distance of 106.2 feet to a point; and
Thence, South 32 degrees, 04 minutes, 55 seconds East a
distance of 218.9 feet to a point; and
Thence, South 61 degrees, 29 minutes, 40 seconds West a
distance of 148.9 feet to a point; and
Thence, North 35 degrees, 14 minutes, 12 seconds West a
distance of 87.5 feet to a point; and
Thence, North 78 degrees, 30 minutes, 58 seconds West a
distance of 68.4 feet to a point; and
Thence, North 27 degrees, 11 minutes, 39 seconds West a
distance of 157.3 feet to the point of beginning.
(f) York Harbor, Maine.--The following portions of the project for
navigation, York Harbor, Maine, authorized by section 101 of the River
and Harbor Act of 1960 (Public Law 86-645; 74 Stat. 480), are
deauthorized:
(1) The portion located in the 8-foot deep anchorage area
beginning at coordinates N109340.19, E372066.93, thence running
north 65 degrees, 12 minutes, 10.5 seconds east 423.27 feet to
a point N109517.71, E372451.17, thence running north 28
degrees, 42 minutes, 58.3 seconds west 11.68 feet to a point
N109527.95, E372445.56, thence running south 63 degrees, 37
minutes, 24.6 seconds west 422.63 feet to the point of
beginning.
(2) The portion located in the 8-foot deep anchorage area
beginning at coordinates N108557.24, E371645.88, thence running
south 60 degrees, 41 minutes, 17.2 seconds east 484.51 feet to
a point N108320.04, E372068.36, thence running north 29
degrees, 12 minutes, 53.3 seconds east 15.28 feet to a point
N108333.38, E372075.82, thence running north 62 degrees, 29
minutes, 42.1 seconds west 484.73 feet to the point of
beginning.
(g) Fall River Harbor, Massachusetts and Rhode Island.--The project
for navigation, Fall River Harbor, Massachusetts and Rhode Island,
authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (Public
Law 90-483; 82 Stat. 731), is modified to provide that alteration of
the drawspan of the Brightman Street Bridge to provide a channel width
of 300 feet shall not be required after the date of enactment of this
Act.
(h) Oswegatchie River, Ogdensburg, New York.--The portion of the
Federal channel in the Oswegatchie River in Ogdensburg, New York, from
the southernmost alignment of the Route 68 bridge, upstream to the
northernmost alignment of the Lake Street bridge, is deauthorized.
(i) Kickapoo River, Wisconsin.--
(1) Project modification.--The project for flood control
and allied purposes, Kickapoo River, Wisconsin, authorized by
section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (Public Law 87-
874; 76 Stat. 1190), as modified by section 814 of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat.
4169), is further modified as provided by this subsection.
(2) Transfer of property.--
(A) In general.--Subject to the requirements of
this paragraph, the Secretary shall transfer to the
State of Wisconsin, without consideration, all right,
title, and interest of the United States in and to the
lands described in subparagraph (B), including all
works, structures, and other improvements on the lands.
(B) Land description.--The lands to be transferred
pursuant to subparagraph (A) are the approximately
8,569 acres of land associated with the LaFarge Dam and
Lake portion of the project referred to in paragraph
(1) in Vernon County, Wisconsin, in the following
sections:
(i) Section 31, Township 14 North, Range 1
West of the 4th Principal Meridian.
(ii) Sections 2 through 11, and 16, 17, 20,
and 21, Township 13 North, Range 2 West of the
4th Principal Meridian.
(iii) Sections 15, 16, 21 through 24, 26,
27, 31, and 33 through 36, Township 14 North,
Range 2 West of the 4th Principal Meridian.
(C) Terms and conditions.--The transfer under
subparagraph (A) shall be made on the condition that
the State of Wisconsin enters into a written agreement
with the Secretary to hold the United States harmless
from all claims arising from or through the operation
of the lands and improvements subject to the transfer.
(D) Deadlines.--Not later than July 1, 1996, the
Secretary shall transmit to the State of Wisconsin an
offer to make the transfer under this paragraph. The
offer shall provide for the transfer to be made in the
period beginning on November 1, 1996, and ending on
December 31, 1996.
(E) Deauthorization.--The LaFarge Dam and Lake
portion of the project referred to in paragraph (1) is
not authorized after the date of the transfer under
this paragraph.
(F) Interim management and maintenance.--The
Secretary shall continue to manage and maintain the
LaFarge Dam and Lake portion of project referred to in
paragraph (1) until the date of the transfer under this
paragraph.
SEC. 104. STUDIES.
(a) Bear Creek Drainage, San Joaquin County, California.--The
Secretary shall conduct a review of the Bear Creek Drainage, San
Joaquin County, California, flood control project, authorized by
section 10 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of
certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for
other purposes'', approved December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 901), to develop
a comprehensive plan for additional flood damage reduction measures for
the city of Stockton, California, and surrounding areas.
(b) Lake Elsinore, Riverside County, California.--Not later than 18
months after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall--
(1) conduct a study of the advisability of modifying, for
the purpose of flood control pursuant to section 205 of the
Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), the Lake Elsinore,
Riverside County, California, flood control project, for water
conservation storage up to an elevation of 1,249 feet above
mean sea level; and
(2) report to Congress on the study, including making
recommendations concerning the advisability of so modifying the
project.
(c) Long Beach, California.--The Secretary shall review the
feasibility of navigation improvements at Long Beach Harbor,
California, including widening and deepening of the navigation channel,
as provided for in section 201(b) of the Water Resources Development
Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4091). The Secretary shall
complete the report not later than 1 year after the date of enactment
of this Act.
(d) Mormon Slough/Calaveras River, California.--The Secretary shall
conduct a review of the Mormon Slough/Calaveras River, California,
flood control project, authorized by section 10 of the Act entitled
``An Act authorizing the construction of certain public works on rivers
and harbors for flood control, and for other purposes'', approved
December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 902), to develop a comprehensive plan for
additional flood damage reduction measures for the city of Stockton,
California, and surrounding areas.
(e) Murrieta Creek, Riverside County, California.--The Secretary
shall review the completed feasibility study of the Riverside County
Flood Control and Water Conservation District, including identified
alternatives, concerning Murrieta Creek from Temecula to Wildomar,
Riverside County, California, to determine the Federal interest in
participating in a project for flood control.
(f) Pine Flat Dam Fish and Wildlife Habitat Restoration,
California.--The Secretary shall study the feasibility of fish and
wildlife habitat improvement measures identified for further study by
the Pine Flat Dam Fish and Wildlife Habitat Restoration Investigation
Reconnaissance Report.
(g) West Dade, Florida.--The Secretary shall conduct a
reconnaissance study to determine the Federal interest in using the
West Dade, Florida, reuse facility to increase the supply of surface
water to the Everglades in order to enhance fish and wildlife habitat.
(h) Savannah River Basin Comprehensive Water Resources Study.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary shall conduct a
comprehensive study to address the current and future needs for
flood damage prevention and reduction, water supply, and other
related water resources needs in the Savannah River Basin.
(2) Scope.--The scope of the study shall be limited to an
analysis of water resources issues that fall within the
traditional civil works missions of the Army Corps of
Engineers.
(3) Coordination.--Notwithstanding paragraph (2), the
Secretary shall ensure that the study is coordinated with the
Environmental Protection Agency and the ongoing watershed study
by the Agency of the Savannah River Basin.
(i) Bayou Blanc, Crowley, Louisiana.--The Secretary shall conduct a
reconnaissance study to determine the Federal interest in the
construction of a bulkhead system, consisting of either steel sheet
piling with tiebacks or concrete, along the embankment of Bayou Blanc,
Crowley, Louisiana, in order to alleviate slope failures and erosion
problems in a cost-effective manner.
(j) Hackberry Industrial Ship Channel Park, Louisiana.--The
Secretary shall incorporate the area of Hackberry, Louisiana, as part
of the overall study of the Lake Charles ship channel, bypass channel,
and general anchorage area in Louisiana, to explore the possibility of
constructing additional anchorage areas.
(k) City of North Las Vegas, Clark County, Nevada.--The Secretary
shall conduct a reconnaissance study to determine the Federal interest
in channel improvements in channel A of the North Las Vegas Wash in the
city of North Las Vegas, Nevada, for the purpose of flood control.
(l) Lower Las Vegas Wash Wetlands, Clark County, Nevada.--The
Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of the
restoration of wetlands in the Lower Las Vegas Wash, Nevada, for the
purposes of erosion control and environmental restoration.
(m) Northern Nevada.--The Secretary shall conduct reconnaissance
studies, in the State of Nevada, of--
(1) the Humboldt River, and the tributaries and outlets of
the river;
(2) the Truckee River, and the tributaries and outlets of
the river;
(3) the Carson River, and the tributaries and outlets of
the river; and
(4) the Walker River, and the tributaries and outlets of
the river;
in order to determine the Federal interest in flood control,
environmental restoration, conservation of fish and wildlife,
recreation, water conservation, water quality, and toxic and
radioactive waste.
(n) Buffalo Harbor, New York.--The Secretary shall determine the
feasibility of excavating the inner harbor and constructing the
associated bulkheads in Buffalo Harbor, New York.
(o) Coeymans, New York.--The Secretary shall conduct a
reconnaissance study to determine the Federal interest in reopening the
secondary channel of the Hudson River in the town of Coeymans, New
York, which has been narrowed by silt as a result of the construction
of Coeymans middle dike by the Army Corps of Engineers.
(p) Shinnecock Inlet, New York.--Not later than 2 years after the
date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall conduct a
reconnaissance study in Shinnecock Inlet, New York, to determine the
Federal interest in constructing a sand bypass system, or other
appropriate alternative, for the purposes of allowing sand to flow in
the natural east-to-west pattern of the sand and preventing the further
erosion of the beaches west of the inlet and the shoaling of the inlet.
(q) Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay Channels, New York and New
Jersey.--The Secretary shall continue engineering and design in order
to complete the navigation project at Kill Van Kull and Newark Bay
Channels, New York and New Jersey, authorized to be constructed in the
Supplemental Appropriations Act, 1985 (Public Law 99-88; 99 Stat. 313),
and section 202(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986
(Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4095), described in the general design
memorandum for the project, and approved in the Report of the Chief of
Engineers dated December 14, 1981.
(r) Columbia Slough, Oregon.--Not later than 2 years after the date
of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall complete a feasibility
study for the ecosystem restoration project at Columbia Slough, Oregon,
as reported in the August 1993 Revised Reconnaissance Study. The study
shall be a demonstration study done in coordination with the
Environmental Protection Agency.
(s) Oahe Dam to Lake Sharpe, South Dakota.--The Secretary shall--
(1) conduct a study to determine the feasibility of
sediment removal and control in the area of the Missouri River
downstream of Oahe Dam through the upper reaches of Lake
Sharpe, including the lower portion of the Bad River, South
Dakota; and
(2) develop a comprehensive sediment removal and control
plan for the area--
(A) based on the assessment by the study of the
dredging, estimated costs, and time required to remove
sediment from affected areas in Lake Sharpe;
(B)(i) based on the identification by the study of
high erosion areas in the Bad River channel; and
(ii) including recommendations and related costs
for such of the areas as are in need of stabilization
and restoration; and
(C)(i) based on the identification by the study of
shoreline erosion areas along Lake Sharpe; and
(ii) including recommended options for the
stabilization and restoration of the areas.
(t) Ashley Creek, Utah.--The Secretary is authorized to study the
feasibility of undertaking a project for fish and wildlife restoration
at Ashley Creek, near Vernal, Utah.
TITLE II--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS
SEC. 201. HEBER SPRINGS, ARKANSAS.
(a) In General.--The Secretary shall enter into an agreement with
the city of Heber Springs, Arkansas, to provide 3,522 acre-feet of
water supply storage in Greers Ferry Lake, Arkansas, for municipal and
industrial purposes, at no cost to the city.
(b) Necessary Facilities.--The city of Heber Springs shall be
responsible for 100 percent of the costs of construction, operation,
and maintenance of any intake, transmission, treatment, or distribution
facility necessary for utilization of the water supply.
(c) Additional Water Supply Storage.--Any additional water supply
storage required after the date of enactment of this Act shall be
contracted for and reimbursed by the city of Heber Springs, Arkansas.
SEC. 202. MORGAN POINT, ARKANSAS.
The Secretary shall accept as in-kind contributions for the project
at Morgan Point, Arkansas--
(1) the items described as fish and wildlife facilities and
land in the Morgan Point Broadway Closure Structure
modification report for the project, dated February 1994; and
(2) fish stocking activities carried out by the non-Federal
interests for the project.
SEC. 203. WHITE RIVER BASIN LAKES, ARKANSAS AND MISSOURI.
The project for flood control and power generation at White River
Basin Lakes, Arkansas and Missouri, authorized by section 4 of the Act
entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of certain public works
on rivers and harbors for flood control, and for other purposes'',
approved June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1218), shall include recreation and
fish and wildlife mitigation as purposes of the project, to the extent
that the purposes do not adversely impact flood control, power
generation, or other authorized purposes of the project.
SEC. 204. CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN FLORIDA.
The project for Central and Southern Florida, authorized by section
203 of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (Public Law 90-483; 82 Stat. 740),
is modified, subject to the availability of appropriations, to
authorize the Secretary to implement the recommended plan of
improvement contained in a report entitled ``Central and Southern
Florida Project, Final Integrated General Reevaluation Report and
Environmental Impact Statement, Canal 111 (C-111), South Dade County,
Florida'', dated May 1994 (including acquisition of such portions of
the Frog Pond and Rocky Glades areas as are needed for the project), at
a total cost of $121,000,000. The Federal share of the cost of
implementing the plan of improvement shall be 50 percent. The Secretary
of the Interior shall pay 25 percent of the cost of acquiring such
portions of the Frog Pond and Rocky Glades areas as are needed for the
project, which amount shall be included in the Federal share. The non-
Federal share of the operation and maintenance costs of the
improvements undertaken pursuant to this section shall be 100 percent,
except that the Federal Government shall reimburse the non-Federal
interest in an amount equal to 60 percent of the costs of operating and
maintaining pump stations that pump water into Taylor Slough in
Everglades National Park.
SEC. 205. WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA.
The project for flood protection of West Palm Beach, Florida (C-
51), authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (Public
Law 87-874; 76 Stat. 1183), is modified to provide for the construction
of an enlarged stormwater detention area, Storm Water Treatment Area 1
East, generally in accordance with the plan of improvements described
in the February 15, 1994, report entitled ``Everglades Protection
Project, Palm Beach County, Florida, Conceptual Design'', prepared by
Burns and McDonnell, and as further described in detailed design
documents to be approved by the Secretary. The additional work
authorized by this section shall be accomplished at full Federal cost
in recognition of the water supply benefits accruing to the Loxahatchee
National Wildlife Refuge and the Everglades National Park and in
recognition of the statement in support of the Everglades restoration
effort set forth in the document signed by the Secretary of the
Interior and the Secretary in July 1993. Operation and maintenance of
the stormwater detention area shall be consistent with regulations
prescribed by the Secretary for the Central and Southern Florida
project, with all costs of the operation and maintenance work borne by
non-Federal interests.
SEC. 206. PERIODIC MAINTENANCE DREDGING FOR GREENVILLE INNER HARBOR
CHANNEL, MISSISSIPPI.
The Greenville Inner Harbor Channel, Mississippi, is deemed to be a
portion of the navigable waters of the United States, and shall be
included among the navigable waters for which the Army Corps of
Engineers maintains a 10-foot navigable channel. The navigable channel
for the Greenville Inner Harbor Channel shall be maintained in a manner
that is consistent with the navigable channel to the Greenville Harbor
and the portion of the Mississippi River adjacent to the Greenville
Harbor that is maintained by the Army Corps of Engineers, as in
existence on the date of enactment of this Act.
SEC. 207. SARDIS LAKE, MISSISSIPPI.
The Secretary shall work cooperatively with the State of
Mississippi and the city of Sardis to the maximum extent practicable in
the management of existing and proposed leases of land consistent with
the master tourism and recreational plan for the economic development
of the Sardis Lake area prepared by the city.
SEC. 208. LIBBY DAM, MONTANA.
(a) In General.--In accordance with section 103(c)(1) of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(c)(1)), the Secretary
shall--
(1) complete the construction and installation of
generating units 6 through 8 at Libby Dam, Montana; and
(2) remove the partially constructed haul bridge over the
Kootenai River, Montana.
(b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be
appropriated to carry out this section $16,000,000, to remain available
until expended.
SEC. 209. SMALL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT, MALTA, MONTANA.
Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the
Secretary is authorized to expend such Federal funds as are necessary
to complete the small flood control project begun at Malta, Montana,
pursuant to section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C.
701s).
SEC. 210. CLIFFWOOD BEACH, NEW JERSEY.
(a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law or the
status of the project authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control
Act of 1962 (Public Law 87-874; 76 Stat. 1180) for hurricane-flood
protection and beach erosion control on Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay,
New Jersey, the Secretary shall undertake a project to provide periodic
beach nourishment for Cliffwood Beach, New Jersey, for a 50-year period
beginning on the date of execution of a project cooperation agreement
by the Secretary and an appropriate non-Federal interest.
(b) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of the
project authorized by this section shall be 35 percent.
SEC. 211. FIRE ISLAND INLET, NEW YORK.
For the purpose of replenishing the beach, the Secretary shall
place sand dredged from the Fire Island Inlet on the shoreline between
Gilgo State Park and Tobay Beach to protect Ocean Parkway along the
Atlantic Ocean shoreline in Suffolk County, New York.
SEC. 212. BUFORD TRENTON IRRIGATION DISTRICT, NORTH DAKOTA AND MONTANA.
(a) Acquisition of Easements.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary shall acquire, from willing
sellers, permanent flowage and saturation easements over--
(A) the land in Williams County, North Dakota,
extending from the riverward margin of the Buford
Trenton Irrigation District main canal to the north
bank of the Missouri River, beginning at the Buford
Trenton Irrigation District pumping station located in
the NE\1/4\ of section 17, T-152-N, R-104-W, and
continuing northeasterly downstream to the land
referred to as the East Bottom; and
(B) any other land outside the boundaries of the
Buford Trenton Irrigation District described in
subparagraph (A) that has been affected by rising
ground water and surface flooding.
(2) Scope.--The easements acquired by the Secretary under
paragraph (1) shall include the right, power, and privilege of
the Federal Government to submerge, overflow, percolate, and
saturate the surface and subsurface of the lands and such other
terms and conditions as the Secretary considers appropriate.
(3) Payment.--In acquiring the easements under paragraph
(1), the Secretary shall pay an amount based on the unaffected
fee value of the lands subject to the easements. For the
purpose of this paragraph, the unaffected fee value of the
lands is the value of the lands prior to being affected by
rising ground water and surface flooding.
(b) Conveyance of Drainage Pumps.--Notwithstanding any other law,
the Secretary may--
(1) convey to the Buford Trenton Irrigation District all
right, title, and interest of the United States in the drainage
pumps located within the boundaries of the District; and
(2) may provide a lump sum payment of $60,000 for power
requirements associated with the operation of the drainage
pumps.
(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be
appropriated to carry out this section $34,000,000, to remain available
until expended.
SEC. 213. WISTER LAKE PROJECT, LEFLORE COUNTY, OKLAHOMA.
The Secretary shall maintain a minimum conservation pool level of
478 feet at the Wister Lake project in LeFlore County, Oklahoma,
authorized by section 4 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the
construction of certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood
control, and for other purposes'', approved June 28, 1938 (52 Stat.
1218). Notwithstanding title I of the Water Resources Development Act
of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211 et seq.) or any other provision of law, any
increase in water supply yield that results from the pool level of 478
feet shall be treated as unallocated water supply until such time as a
user enters into a contract for the supply under such applicable laws
concerning cost-sharing as are in effect on the date of the contract.
SEC. 214. WILLAMETTE RIVER, MCKENZIE SUBBASIN, OREGON.
The Secretary is authorized to carry out a project to control the
water temperature in the Willamette River, McKenzie Subbasin, Oregon,
to mitigate the negative impacts on fish and wildlife resulting from
the operation of the Blue River and Cougar Lake projects, McKenzie
River Basin, Oregon. The cost of the facilities shall be repaid
according to the allocations among the purposes of the original
projects.
SEC. 215. ABANDONED AND WRECKED BARGE REMOVAL, RHODE ISLAND.
Section 361 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (Public
Law 102-580; 106 Stat. 4861) is amended by striking subsection (a) and
inserting the following:
``(a) In General.--In order to alleviate a hazard to navigation and
recreational activity, the Secretary shall remove a sunken barge from
waters off the shore of the Narragansett Town Beach in Narragansett,
Rhode Island, at a total cost of $1,900,000, with an estimated Federal
cost of $1,425,000, and an estimated non-Federal cost of $475,000. The
Secretary shall not remove the barge until title to the barge has been
transferred to the United States or the non-Federal interest. The
transfer of title shall be carried out at no cost to the United
States.''.
SEC. 216. PROVIDENCE RIVER AND HARBOR, RHODE ISLAND.
The Secretary shall incorporate a channel extending from the
vicinity of the Fox Point hurricane barrier to the vicinity of the
Francis Street bridge in Providence, Rhode Island, into the navigation
project for Providence River and Harbor, Rhode Island, authorized by
section 301 of the River and Harbor Act of 1965 (Public Law 89-298; 79
Stat. 1089). The channel shall have a depth of up to 10 feet and a
width of approximately 120 feet and shall be approximately 1.25 miles
in length.
SEC. 217. COOPER LAKE AND CHANNELS, TEXAS.
(a) Acceptance of Lands.--The Secretary is authorized to accept
from a non-Federal interest additional lands of not to exceed 300 acres
that--
(1) are contiguous to the Cooper Lake and Channels Project,
Texas, authorized by section 301 of the River and Harbor Act of
1965 (Public Law 89-298; 79 Stat. 1091) and section 601(a) of
the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662;
100 Stat. 4145); and
(2) provide habitat value at least equal to the habitat
value provided by the lands authorized to be redesignated under
subsection (b).
(b) Redesignation of Lands to Recreation Purposes.--Upon the
acceptance of lands under subsection (a), the Secretary is authorized
to redesignate mitigation lands of not to exceed 300 acres to
recreation purposes.
(c) Funding.--The cost of all work under this section, including
real estate appraisals, cultural and environmental surveys, and all
development necessary to avoid net mitigation losses, to the extent
required, shall be borne by the non-Federal interest.
SEC. 218. RUDEE INLET, VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA.
Notwithstanding the limitation set forth in section 107(b) of the
River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577(b)), Federal participation
in the maintenance of the Rudee Inlet, Virginia Beach, Virginia,
project shall continue for the life of the project. Nothing in this
section shall alter or modify the non-Federal cost sharing
responsibility as specified in the Rudee Inlet, Virginia Beach,
Virginia Detailed Project Report, dated October 1983.
SEC. 219. VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA.
Notwithstanding any other law, the non-Federal share of the costs
of the project for beach erosion control and hurricane protection,
Virginia Beach, Virginia, authorized by section 501(a) of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-662; 100 Stat. 4136),
shall be reduced by $3,120,803, or by such amount as is determined by
an audit carried out by the Department of the Army to be due to the
city of Virginia Beach as reimbursement for beach nourishment
activities carried out by the city between October 1, 1986, and
September 30, 1993, if the Federal Government has not reimbursed the
city for the activities prior to the date on which a project
cooperation agreement is executed for the project.
TITLE III--GENERAL PROVISIONS
SEC. 301. COST-SHARING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS.
Section 103(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33
U.S.C. 2213(c)) is amended--
(1) in paragraph (5), by striking ``and'' at the end;
(2) in paragraph (6), by striking the period at the end and
inserting ``; and''; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
``(7) environmental protection and restoration: 25
percent.''.
SEC. 302. COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.
Section 7 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (33 U.S.C.
2313) is amended--
(1) by striking subsection (e);
(2) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and
(3) by inserting after subsection (c) the following:
``(d) Temporary Protection of Technology.--
``(1) Pre-agreement.--If the Secretary determines that
information developed as a result of a research or development
activity conducted by the Army Corps of Engineers is likely to
be subject to a cooperative research and development agreement
within 2 years after the development of the information, and
that the information would be a trade secret or commercial or
financial information that would be privileged or confidential
if the information had been obtained from a non-Federal party
participating in a cooperative research and development
agreement under section 12 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology
Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3710a), the Secretary may
provide appropriate protections against the dissemination of
the information, including exemption from subchapter II of
chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code, until the earlier
of--
``(A) the date on which the Secretary enters into
such an agreement with respect to the information; or
``(B) the last day of the 2-year period beginning
on the date of the determination.
``(2) Post-agreement.--Any information subject to paragraph
(1) that becomes the subject of a cooperative research and
development agreement shall be subject to the protections
provided under section 12(c)(7)(B) of the Act (15 U.S.C.
3710a(c)(7)(B)) as if the information had been developed under
a cooperative research and development agreement.''.
SEC. 303. NATIONAL INVENTORY OF DAMS.
Section 13 of Public Law 92-367 (33 U.S.C. 467l) is amended by
striking the second sentence and inserting the following: ``There are
authorized to be appropriated to carry out this section $500,000 for
each fiscal year.''.
SEC. 304. HYDROELECTRIC POWER PROJECT UPRATING.
(a) In General.--In carrying out the maintenance, rehabilitation,
and modernization of a hydroelectric power generating facility at a
water resources project under the jurisdiction of the Department of the
Army, the Secretary is authorized to take such actions as are necessary
to increase the efficiency of energy production or the capacity of the
facility, or both, if, after consulting with the heads of other
appropriate Federal and State agencies, the Secretary determines that
the increase--
(1) is economically justified and financially feasible;
(2) will not result in any significant adverse effect on
the other purposes for which the project is authorized;
(3) will not result in significant adverse environmental
impacts; and
(4) will not involve major structural or operational
changes in the project.
(b) Effect on Other Authority.--This section shall not affect the
authority of the Secretary and the Administrator of the Bonneville
Power Administration under section 2406 of the Energy Policy Act of
1992 (16 U.S.C. 839d-1).
SEC. 305. FEDERAL LUMP-SUM PAYMENTS FOR FEDERAL OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE COSTS.
(a) In General.--In the case of a water resources project under the
jurisdiction of the Department of the Army for which the non-Federal
interests are responsible for performing the operation, maintenance,
replacement, and rehabilitation of the project, or a separable element
(as defined in section 103(f) of the Water Resources Development Act of
1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(f)) of the project, and for which the Federal
Government is responsible for paying a portion of the operation,
maintenance, replacement, and rehabilitation costs of the project or
separable element, the Secretary may make, in accordance with this
section and under terms and conditions acceptable to the Secretary, a
payment of the estimated total Federal share of the costs to the non-
Federal interests after completion of construction of the project or
separable element.
(b) Amount of Payment.--The amount that may be paid by the
Secretary under subsection (a) shall be equal to the present value of
the Federal payments over the life of the project, as estimated by the
Federal Government, and shall be computed using an interest rate
determined by the Secretary of the Treasury taking into consideration
current market yields on outstanding marketable obligations of the
United States with maturities comparable to the remaining life of the
project.
(c) Agreement.--The Secretary may make a payment under this section
only if the non-Federal interests have entered into a binding agreement
with the Secretary to perform the operation, maintenance, replacement,
and rehabilitation of the project or separable element. The agreement
shall--
(1) meet the requirements of section 221 of the Flood
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b); and
(2) specify--
(A) the terms and conditions under which a payment
may be made under this section; and
(B) the rights of, and remedies available to, the
Federal Government to recover all or a portion of a
payment made under this section if a non-Federal
interest suspends or terminates the performance by the
non-Federal interest of the operation, maintenance,
replacement, and rehabilitation of the project or
separable element, or fails to perform the activities
in a manner that is satisfactory to the Secretary.
(d) Effect of Payment.--Except as provided in subsection (c), a
payment provided to the non-Federal interests under this section shall
relieve the Federal Government of any obligation, after the date of the
payment, to pay any of the operation, maintenance, replacement, or
rehabilitation costs for the project or separable element.
SEC. 306. COST-SHARING FOR REMOVAL OF EXISTING PROJECT FEATURES.
After the date of enactment of this Act, any proposal submitted to
Congress by the Secretary for modification of an existing authorized
water resources development project (in existence on the date of the
proposal) by removal of one or more of the project features that would
significantly and adversely impact the authorized project purposes or
outputs shall include the recommendation that the non-Federal interests
shall provide 50 percent of the cost of any such modification,
including the cost of acquiring any additional interests in lands that
become necessary for accomplishing the modification.
SEC. 307. TERMINATION OF TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
Section 310 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33
U.S.C. 2319) is amended--
(1) by striking subsection (a); and
(2) in subsection (b)--
(A) by striking ``(b) Public Participation.--'';
and
(B) by striking ``subsection'' each place it
appears and inserting ``section''.
SEC. 308. CONDITIONS FOR PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.
(a) In General.--Section 1001(b)(2) of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)) is amended--
(1) in the first sentence, by striking ``10'' and inserting
``5'';
(2) in the second sentence, by striking ``Before'' and
inserting ``Upon official''; and
(3) in the last sentence, by inserting ``the planning,
design, or'' before ``construction''.
(b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 52 of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1988 (Public Law 100-676; 102 Stat. 4044) is
amended--
(1) by striking subsection (a) (33 U.S.C. 579a note);
(2) by redesignating subsections (b) through (e) as
subsections (a) through (d), respectively; and
(3) in subsection (d) (as so redesignated), by striking
``or subsection (a) of this section''.
SEC. 309. PARTICIPATION IN INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING AND SCIENTIFIC
CONFERENCES.
Section 211 of the Flood Control Act of 1950 (33 U.S.C. 701u) is
repealed.
SEC. 310. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN SUPPORT OF ARMY CIVIL WORKS
PROGRAM.
(a) In General.--In carrying out research and development in
support of the civil works program of the Department of the Army, the
Secretary may utilize contracts, cooperative research and development
agreements, and cooperative agreements with, and grants to, non-Federal
entities, including State and local governments, colleges and
universities, consortia, professional and technical societies, public
and private scientific and technical foundations, research
institutions, educational organizations, and nonprofit organizations.
(b) Commercial Application.--In the case of a contract for research
or development, or both, the Secretary may--
(1) require that the research or development, or both, have
potential commercial application; and
(2) use the potential for commercial application as an
evaluation factor, if appropriate.
SEC. 311. INTERAGENCY AND INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT AUTHORITY.
(a) In General.--The Secretary may engage in activities in support
of other Federal agencies or international organizations to address
problems of national significance to the United States. The Secretary
may engage in activities in support of international organizations only
after consulting with the Secretary of State. The Secretary may use the
technical and managerial expertise of the Army Corps of Engineers to
address domestic and international problems related to water resources,
infrastructure development, and environmental protection.
(b) Funding.--There are authorized to be appropriated $1,000,000 to
carry out this section. The Secretary may accept and expend additional
funds from other Federal agencies or international organizations to
carry this section.
SEC. 312. SECTION 1135 PROGRAM.
(a) Expansion of Program.--Section 1135 of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a) is amended--
(1) in subsection (a), by inserting before the period at
the end the following: ``and to determine if the operation of
the projects has contributed to the degradation of the quality
of the environment'';
(2) in subsection (b), by striking the last two sentences;
(3) by redesignating subsections (c), (d), and (e) as
subsections (e), (f), and (g), respectively; and
(4) by inserting after subsection (b) the following:
``(c) Measures To Restore Environmental Quality.--If the Secretary
determines under subsection (a) that operation of a water resources
project has contributed to the degradation of the quality of the
environment, the Secretary may carry out, with respect to the project,
measures for the restoration of environmental quality, if the measures
are feasible and consistent with the authorized purposes of the
project.
``(d) Funding.--The non-Federal share of the cost of any
modification or measure carried out pursuant to subsection (b) or (c)
shall be 25 percent. Not more than $5,000,000 in Federal funds may be
expended on any 1 such modification or measure.''.
(b) Pine Flat Dam Fish and Wildlife Habitat Restoration,
California.--In accordance with section 1135(b) of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a(b)), the Secretary shall carry
out the construction of a turbine bypass at Pine Flat Dam, Kings River,
California.
(c) Lower Amazon Creek Restoration, Oregon.--In accordance with
section 1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C.
2309a), the Secretary may carry out justified environmental restoration
measures with respect to the flood reduction measures constructed by
the Army Corps of Engineers, and the related flood reduction measures
constructed by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, in the
Amazon Creek drainage. The Federal share of the restoration measures
shall be jointly funded by the Army Corps of Engineers and the Natural
Resources Conservation Service in proportion to the share required to
be paid by each agency of the original costs of the flood reduction
measures.
SEC. 313. ENVIRONMENTAL DREDGING.
Section 312 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (Public
Law 101-640; 33 U.S.C. 1252 note) is amended by striking subsection
(f).
SEC. 314. FEASIBILITY STUDIES.
(a) Non-Federal Share.--Section 105(a)(1) of the Water Resources
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215(a)(1)) is amended--
(1) in the first sentence, by striking ``during the period
of such study'';
(2) by inserting after the first sentence the following:
``During the period of the study, the non-Federal share of the
cost of the study shall be not more than 50 percent of the
estimate of the cost of the study as contained in the
feasibility cost sharing agreement. The cost estimate may be
amended only by mutual agreement of the Secretary and the non-
Federal interests. The non-Federal share of any costs in excess
of the cost estimate shall, except as otherwise mutually agreed
by the Secretary and the non-Federal interests, be payable
after the project has been authorized for construction and on
the date on which the Secretary and non-Federal interests enter
into an agreement pursuant to section 101(e) or 103(j).''; and
(3) in the last sentence, by striking ``such non-Federal
contribution'' and inserting ``the non-Federal share required
under this paragraph''.
(b) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall
apply notwithstanding any feasibility cost sharing agreement entered
into by the Secretary and non-Federal interests, and the Secretary
shall amend any feasibility cost sharing agreements in effect on the
date of enactment of this Act so as to conform the agreements with the
amendments. Nothing in this section or any amendment made by this
section shall require the Secretary to reimburse the non-Federal
interests for funds previously contributed for a study.
SEC. 315. OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL REQUIREMENT.
(a) Penalty.--Section 16 of the Act entitled ``An Act making
appropriations for the construction, repair, and preservation of
certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'',
approved March 3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 411), is amended--
(1) by striking ``sections thirteen, fourteen, and
fifteen'' and inserting ``section 13, 14, 15, 19, or 20''; and
(2) by striking ``not exceeding twenty-five hundred dollars
nor less than five hundred dollars'' and inserting ``of not
more than $25,000 for each day that the violation continues''.
(b) General Authority.--Section 20 of the Act (33 U.S.C. 415) is
amended--
(1) in subsection (a)--
(A) by striking ``Under emergency'' and inserting
``Summary Removal Procedures.--Under emergency''; and
(B) by striking ``expense'' the first place it
appears and inserting ``actual expense, including
administrative expenses,'';
(2) in subsection (b)--
(A) by striking ``cost'' and inserting ``actual
cost, including administrative costs,''; and
(B) by striking ``(b) The'' and inserting ``(c)
Liability of Owner, Lessee, or Operator.--The''; and
(3) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
``(b) Removal Requirement.--Not later than 24 hours after the
Secretary of the Department in which the Coast Guard is operating
issues an order to stop or delay navigation in any navigable waters of
the United States because of conditions related to the sinking or
grounding of a vessel, the owner or operator of the vessel, with the
approval of the Secretary of the Army, shall begin removal of the
vessel using the most expeditious removal method available or, if
appropriate, secure the vessel pending removal to allow navigation to
resume. If the owner or operator fails to begin removal or to secure
the vessel pending removal in accordance with the preceding sentence or
fails to complete removal as soon as possible, the Secretary of the
Army shall remove or destroy the vessel using the summary removal
procedures under subsection (a).''.
SEC. 316. LEVEE OWNERS MANUAL.
Section 5 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction
of certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and
for other purposes'', approved August 18, 1941 (33 U.S.C. 701n), is
amended by adding at the end the following:
``(c) Levee Owners Manual.--
``(1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date of
enactment of this subsection, in accordance with chapter 5 of
title 5, United States Code, the Secretary shall prepare a
manual describing the maintenance and upkeep responsibilities
that the Army Corps of Engineers requires of a non-Federal
interest in order for the non-Federal interest to receive
Federal assistance under this section. The Secretary shall
provide a copy of the manual at no cost to each non-Federal
interest that is eligible to receive Federal assistance under
this section.
``(2) Prohibition on delegation.--The preparation of the
manual shall be carried out under the personal direction of the
Secretary.
``(3) Authorization of appropriations.--There are
authorized to be appropriated $1,000,000 to carry out this
subsection.
``(4) Definitions.--In this subsection:
``(A) Maintenance and upkeep.--The term
`maintenance and upkeep' means all maintenance and
general upkeep of a levee performed on a regular and
consistent basis that is not repair and rehabilitation.
``(B) Repair and rehabilitation.--The term `repair
and rehabilitation'--
``(i) except as provided in clause (ii),
means the repair or rebuilding of a levee or
other flood control structure, after the
structure has been damaged by a flood, to the
level of protection provided by the structure
before the flood; and
``(ii) does not include--
``(I) any improvement to the
structure; or
``(II) repair or rebuilding
described in clause (i) if, in the
normal course of usage, the structure
becomes structurally unsound and is no
longer fit to provide the level of
protection for which the structure was
designed.
``(C) Secretary.--The term `Secretary' means the
Secretary of the Army.''.
SEC. 317. RISK-BASED ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY.
(a) In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment
of this Act, the Secretary shall obtain the services of an independent
consultant to evaluate--
(1) the relationship between--
(A) the Risk-Based Analysis for Evaluation of
Hydrology/Hydraulics and Economics in Flood Damage
Reduction Studies established in an Army Corps of
Engineers engineering circular; and
(B) minimum engineering and safety standards;
(2) the validity of results generated by the studies
described in paragraph (1); and
(3) policy impacts related to change in the studies
described in paragraph (1).
(b) Task Force.--
(1) In general.--In carrying out the independent evaluation
under subsection (a), the Secretary, not later than 90 days
after the date of enactment of this Act, shall establish a task
force to oversee and review the analysis.
(2) Membership.--The task force shall consist of--
(A) the Assistant Secretary of the Army having
responsibility for civil works, who shall serve as
chairperson of the task force;
(B) the Administrator of the Federal Emergency
Management Agency;
(C) the Chief of the Natural Resources Conservation
Service of the Department of Agriculture;
(D) a State representative appointed by the
Secretary from among individuals recommended by the
Association of State Floodplain Managers;
(E) a local government public works official
appointed by the Secretary from among individuals
recommended by a national organization representing
public works officials; and
(F) an individual from the private sector, who
shall be appointed by the Secretary.
(3) Compensation.--
(A) In general.--Except as provided in subparagraph
(B), a member of the task force shall serve without
compensation.
(B) Expenses.--Each member of the task force shall
be allowed--
(i) travel expenses, including per diem in
lieu of subsistence, at rates authorized for
employees of agencies under subchapter I of
chapter 57 of title 5, United States Code,
while away from the home or regular place of
business of the member in the performance of
services for the task force; and
(ii) other expenses incurred in the
performance of services for the task force, as
determined by the Secretary.
(4) Termination.--The task force shall terminate 2 years
after the date of enactment of this Act.
(c) Limitation on Use of Methodology.--During the period beginning
on the date of enactment of this Act and ending 2 years after that
date, if requested by a non-Federal interest, the Secretary shall
refrain from using any risk-based technique required under the studies
described in subsection (a) for the evaluation and design of a project
carried out in cooperation with the non-Federal interest unless the
Secretary, in consultation with the task force, has provided direction
for use of the technique after consideration of the independent
evaluation required under subsection (a).
(d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be
appropriated $500,000 to carry out this section.
SEC. 318. SEDIMENTS DECONTAMINATION TECHNOLOGY.
Section 405 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (Public
Law 102-580; 33 U.S.C. 2239 note) is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)--
(A) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the
following: ``The goal of the program shall be to make
possible the development, on an operational scale, of 1
or more sediment decontamination technologies, each of
which demonstrates a sediment decontamination capacity
of at least 2,500 cubic yards per day.''; and
(B) by adding at the end the following:
``(3) Report to congress.--Not later than September 30,
1996, and September 30 of each year thereafter, the
Administrator and the Secretary shall report to Congress on
progress made toward the goal described in paragraph (2).'';
and
(2) in subsection (c)--
(A) by striking ``$5,000,000'' and inserting
``$10,000,000''; and
(B) by striking ``1992'' and inserting ``1996''.
SEC. 319. MELALEUCA TREE.
Section 104(a) of the River and Harbor Act of 1958 (33 U.S.C.
610(a)) is amended by inserting ``melaleuca tree,'' after ``milfoil,''.
SEC. 320. FAULKNER ISLAND, CONNECTICUT.
In consultation with the Director of the United States Fish and
Wildlife Service, the Secretary shall design and construct shoreline
protection measures for the coastline adjacent to the Faulkner Island
Lighthouse, Connecticut, at a total cost of $4,500,000.
SEC. 321. DESIGNATION OF LOCK AND DAM AT THE RED RIVER WATERWAY,
LOUISIANA.
(a) Designation.--Lock and Dam numbered 4 of the Red River
Waterway, Louisiana, is designated as the ``Russell B. Long Lock and
Dam''.
(b) Legal References.--A reference in any law, regulation,
document, map, record, or other paper of the United States to the lock
and dam referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference
to the ``Russell B. Long Lock and Dam''.
SEC. 322. JURISDICTION OF MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMMISSION, LOUISIANA.
The jurisdiction of the Mississippi River Commission established by
the Act of June 28, 1879 (21 Stat. 37, chapter 43; 33 U.S.C. 641 et
seq.), is extended to include all of the area between the eastern side
of the Bayou Lafourche Ridge from Donaldsonville, Louisiana, to the
Gulf of Mexico and the west guide levee of the Mississippi River from
Donaldsonville, Louisiana, to the Gulf of Mexico.
SEC. 323. WILLIAM JENNINGS RANDOLPH ACCESS ROAD, GARRETT COUNTY,
MARYLAND.
The Secretary shall transfer up to $600,000 from the funds
appropriated for the William Jennings Randolph Lake, Maryland and West
Virginia, project to the State of Maryland for use by the State in
constructing an access road to the William Jennings Randolph Lake in
Garrett County, Maryland.
SEC. 324. ARKABUTLA DAM AND LAKE, MISSISSIPPI.
The Secretary shall repair the access roads to Arkabutla Dam and
Arkabutla Lake in Tate County and DeSoto County, Mississippi, at a
total cost of not to exceed $1,400,000.
SEC. 325. NEW YORK STATE CANAL SYSTEM.
(a) In General.--In order to make capital improvements to the New
York State canal system, the Secretary, with the consent of appropriate
local and State entities, shall enter into such arrangements,
contracts, and leases with public and private entities as may be
necessary for the purposes of rehabilitation, renovation, preservation,
and maintenance of the New York State canal system and related
facilities, including trailside facilities and other recreational
projects along the waterways referred to in subsection (c).
(b) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of capital
improvements under this section shall be 50 percent. The total cost is
$14,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $7,000,000 and an
estimated non-Federal cost of $7,000,000.
(c) Definition of New York State Canal System.--In this section,
the term ``New York State canal system'' means the Erie, Oswego,
Champlain, and Cayuga-Seneca Canals in New York.
SEC. 326. QUONSET POINT-DAVISVILLE, RHODE ISLAND.
The Secretary shall replace the bulkhead between piers 1 and 2 at
the Quonset Point-Davisville Industrial Park, Rhode Island, at a total
cost of $1,350,000. The estimated Federal share of the project cost is
$1,012,500, and the estimated non-Federal share of the project cost is
$337,500. In conjunction with this project, the Secretary shall install
high mast lighting at pier 2 at a total cost of $300,000, with an
estimated Federal cost of $225,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of
$75,000.
SEC. 327. CLOUTER CREEK DISPOSAL AREA, CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA.
(a) Transfer of Administrative Jurisdiction.--Notwithstanding any
other law, the Secretary of the Navy shall transfer to the Secretary
administrative jurisdiction over the approximately 1,400 acres of land
under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Navy that comprise a
portion of the Clouter Creek disposal area, Charleston, South Carolina.
(b) Use of Transferred Land.--The land transferred under subsection
(a) shall be used by the Department of the Army as a dredge material
disposal area for dredging activities in the vicinity of Charleston,
South Carolina, including the Charleston Harbor navigation project.
(c) Cost Sharing.--Nothing in this section modifies any non-Federal
cost-sharing requirement established under title I of the Water
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211 et seq.).
SEC. 328. NUISANCE AQUATIC VEGETATION IN LAKE GASTON, VIRGINIA AND
NORTH CAROLINA.
Section 339(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992
(Public Law 102-580; 106 Stat. 4855) is amended by striking ``1993 and
1994'' and inserting ``1995 and 1996''.
SEC. 329. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE WASHINGTON AQUEDUCT.
(a) Authorizations.--
(1) Authorization of modernization.--Subject to approval
in, and in such amounts as may be provided in appropriations
Acts, the Chief of Engineers of the Army Corps of Engineers is
authorized to modernize the Washington Aqueduct.
(2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized
to be appropriated to the Army Corps of Engineers borrowing
authority in amounts sufficient to cover the full costs of
modernizing the Washington Aqueduct. The borrowing authority
shall be provided by the Secretary of the Treasury, under such
terms and conditions as are established by the Secretary of the
Treasury, after a series of contracts with each public water
supply customer has been entered into under subsection (b).
(b) Contracts With Public Water Supply Customers.--
(1) Contracts to repay corps debt.--To the extent provided
in appropriations Acts, and in accordance with paragraphs (2)
and (3), the Chief of Engineers of the Army Corps of Engineers
is authorized to enter into a series of contracts with each
public water supply customer under which the customer commits
to repay a pro-rata share of the principal and interest owed by
the Army Corps of Engineers to the Secretary of the Treasury
under subsection (a). Under each of the contracts, the customer
that enters into the contract shall commit to pay any
additional amount necessary to fully offset the risk of default
on the contract.
(2) Offsetting of risk of default.--Each contract under
paragraph (1) shall include such additional terms and
conditions as the Secretary of the Treasury may require so that
the value to the Government of the contracts is estimated to be
equal to the obligational authority used by the Army Corps of
Engineers for modernizing the Washington Aqueduct at the time that each
series of contracts is entered into.
(3) Other conditions.--Each contract entered into under
paragraph (1) shall--
(A) provide that the public water supply customer
pledges future income from fees assessed to operate and
maintain the Washington Aqueduct;
(B) provide the United States priority over all
other creditors; and
(C) include other conditions that the Secretary of
the Treasury determines to be appropriate.
(c) Borrowing Authority.--Subject to an appropriation under
subsection (a)(2) and after entering into a series of contracts under
subsection (b), the Secretary, acting through the Chief of Engineers of
the Army Corps of Engineers, shall seek borrowing authority from the
Secretary of the Treasury under subsection (a)(2).
(d) Definitions.--In this section:
(1) Public water supply customer.--The term ``public water
supply customer'' means the District of Columbia, the county of
Arlington, Virginia, and the city of Falls Church, Virginia.
(2) Value to the government.--The term ``value to the
Government'' means the net present value of a contract under
subsection (b) calculated under the rules set forth in
subparagraphs (A) and (B) of section 502(5) of the
Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 661a(5)), excluding
section 502(5)(B)(i) of the Act, as though the contracts
provided for the repayment of direct loans to the public water
supply customers.
(3) Washington aqueduct.--The term ``Washington Aqueduct''
means the water supply system of treatment plans, raw water
intakes, conduits, reservoirs, transmission mains, and pumping
stations owned by the Federal Government located in the
metropolitan Washington, District of Columbia, area.
SEC. 330. CHESAPEAKE BAY ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION AND PROTECTION
PROGRAM.
(a) Establishment.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary shall establish a pilot
program to provide environmental assistance to non-Federal
interests in the Chesapeake Bay watershed.
(2) Form.--The assistance shall be in the form of design
and construction assistance for water-related environmental
infrastructure and resource protection and development projects
affecting the Chesapeake Bay estuary, including projects for
sediment and erosion control, protection of eroding shorelines,
protection of essential public works, wastewater treatment and
related facilities, water supply and related facilities, and
beneficial uses of dredged material, and other related projects
that may enhance the living resources of the estuary.
(b) Public Ownership Requirement.--The Secretary may provide
assistance for a project under this section only if the project is
publicly owned, and will be publicly operated and maintained.
(c) Local Cooperation Agreement.--
(1) In general.--Before providing assistance under this
section, the Secretary shall enter into a local cooperation
agreement with a non-Federal interest to provide for design and
construction of the project to be carried out with the
assistance.
(2) Requirements.--Each local cooperation agreement entered
into under this subsection shall provide for--
(A) the development by the Secretary, in
consultation with appropriate Federal, State, and local
officials, of a facilities or resource protection and
development plan, including appropriate engineering
plans and specifications and an estimate of expected
resource benefits; and
(B) the establishment of such legal and
institutional structures as are necessary to ensure the
effective long-term operation and maintenance of the
project by the non-Federal interest.
(d) Cost Sharing.--
(1) Federal share.--Except as provided in paragraph (2)(B),
the Federal share of the total project costs of each local
cooperation agreement entered into under this section shall be
75 percent.
(2) Non-federal share.--
(A) Value of lands, easements, rights-of-way, and
relocations.--In determining the non-Federal
contribution toward carrying out a local cooperation
agreement entered into under this section, the
Secretary shall provide credit to a non-Federal
interest for the value of lands, easements, rights-of-
way, and relocations provided by the non-Federal
interest, except that the amount of credit provided for
a project under this paragraph may not exceed 25
percent of the total project costs.
(B) Operation and maintenance costs.--The non-
Federal share of the costs of operation and maintenance
of carrying out the agreement under this section shall
be 100 percent.
(e) Applicability of Other Federal and State Laws and Agreements.--
(1) In general.--Nothing in this section waives, limits, or
otherwise affects the applicability of any provision of Federal
or State law that would otherwise apply to a project carried
out with assistance provided under this section.
(2) Cooperation.--In carrying out this section, the
Secretary shall cooperate fully with the heads of appropriate
Federal agencies, including--
(A) the Administrator of the Environmental
Protection Agency;
(B) the Secretary of Commerce, acting through the
Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration;
(C) the Secretary of the Interior, acting through
the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife
Service; and
(D) the heads of such other Federal agencies and
agencies of a State or political subdivision of a State
as the Secretary determines to be appropriate.
(f) Demonstration Project.--The Secretary shall establish at least
1 project under this section in each of the States of Maryland,
Virginia, and Pennsylvania. A project established under this section
shall be carried out using such measures as are necessary to protect
environmental, historic, and cultural resources.
(g) Report.--Not later than December 31, 1998, the Secretary shall
transmit to Congress a report on the results of the program carried out
under this section, together with a recommendation concerning whether
or not the program should be implemented on a national basis.
(h) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000, to remain available
until expended.
SEC. 331. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM TO IMPROVE SALMON SURVIVAL.
(a) Salmon Survival Activities.--
(1) In general.--The Secretary shall accelerate ongoing
research and development activities, and is authorized to carry
out or participate in additional research and development
activities, for the purpose of developing innovative methods
and technologies for improving the survival of salmon,
especially salmon in the Columbia River Basin.
(2) Accelerated activities.--Accelerated research and
development activities referred to in paragraph (1) may include
research and development related to--
(A) impacts from water resources projects and other
impacts on salmon life cycles;
(B) juvenile and adult salmon passage;
(C) light and sound guidance systems;
(D) surface-oriented collector systems;
(E) transportation mechanisms; and
(F) dissolved gas monitoring and abatement.
(3) Additional activities.--Additional research and
development activities referred to in paragraph (1) may include
research and development related to--
(A) marine mammal predation on salmon;
(B) studies of juvenile salmon survival in spawning
and rearing areas;
(C) estuary and near-ocean juvenile and adult
salmon survival;
(D) impacts on salmon life cycles from sources
other than water resources projects; and
(E) other innovative technologies and actions
intended to improve fish survival, including the
survival of resident fish.
(4) Coordination.--The Secretary shall coordinate any
activities carried out under this subsection with appropriate
Federal, State, and local agencies, affected Indian tribes, and
the Northwest Power Planning Council.
(5) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress
a report on the research and development activities carried out
under this subsection, including any recommendations of the
Secretary concerning the research and development activities.
(6) Authorization of appropriations.--There are authorized
to be appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out research and
development activities under subparagraphs (A) through (C) of
paragraph (3).
(b) Advanced Turbine Development.--
(1) In general.--In conjunction with the Secretary of
Energy, the Secretary shall accelerate efforts toward
developing innovative, efficient, and environmentally safe
hydropower turbines, including design of ``fish-friendly''
turbines, for use on the Columbia River hydro system.
(2) Authorization of appropriations.--There are authorized
to be appropriated $12,000,000 to carry out this subsection.
(c) Implementation.--Nothing in this section affects the authority
of the Secretary to implement the results of the research and
development carried out under this section or any other law.
SEC. 332. RECREATIONAL USER FEES.
(a) In General.--Section 210(b)(4) of the Flood Control Act of 1968
(16 U.S.C. 460d-3(b)(4)) is amended by inserting before the period at
the end the following: ``and, subject to the availability of
appropriations, shall be used for the purposes specified in section
4(i)(3) of the Act at the water resources development project at which
the fees were collected''.
(b) Report.--Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of
this Act, the Secretary shall prepare and submit to the Committee on
Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a
report, with respect to fiscal year 1995, on--
(1) the amount of day-use fees collected under section
210(b) of the Flood Control Act of 1968 (16 U.S.C. 460d-3(b))
at each water resources development project; and
(2) the administrative costs associated with the collection
of the day-use fees at each water resources development
project.
SEC. 333. SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEMONSTRATION.
(a) National Shoreline Erosion Control Development and
Demonstration Program.--The Act of August 13, 1946 (60 Stat. 1056,
chapter 960; 33 U.S.C. 426e et seq.), is amended by adding at the end
the following:
``SEC. 5. NATIONAL SHORELINE EROSION CONTROL DEVELOPMENT AND
DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.
``(a) Definitions.--In this section:
``(1) Erosion control program.--The term `erosion control
program' means the national shoreline erosion control
development and demonstration program established under this
section.
``(2) Secretary.--The term `Secretary' means the Secretary
of the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers of the Army
Corps of Engineers.
``(b) Establishment of Erosion Control Program.--The Secretary
shall establish and conduct a national shoreline erosion control
development and demonstration program for a period of 8 years beginning
on the date that funds are made available to carry out this section.
``(c) Requirements.--
``(1) In general.--The erosion control program shall
include provisions for--
``(A) demonstration projects consisting of
planning, designing, and constructing prototype
engineered and vegetative shoreline erosion control
devices and methods during the first 5 years of the
erosion control program;
``(B) adequate monitoring of the prototypes
throughout the duration of the erosion control program;
``(C) detailed engineering and environmental
reports on the results of each demonstration project
carried out under the erosion control program; and
``(D) technology transfers to private property
owners and State and local entities.
``(2) Emphasis.--The demonstration projects carried out
under the erosion control program shall emphasize, to the
extent practicable--
``(A) the development and demonstration of
innovative technologies;
``(B) efficient designs to prevent erosion at a
shoreline site, taking into account the life-cycle cost
of the design, including cleanup, maintenance, and
amortization;
``(C) natural designs, including the use of
vegetation or temporary structures that minimize
permanent structural alterations;
``(D) the avoidance of negative impacts to adjacent
shorefront communities;
``(E) in areas with substantial residential or
commercial interests adjacent to the shoreline, designs
that do not impair the aesthetic appeal of the
interests;
``(F) the potential for long-term protection
afforded by the technology; and
``(G) recommendations developed from evaluations of
the original 1974 program established under the
Shoreline Erosion Control Demonstration Act of 1974
(section 54 of Public Law 93-251; 42 U.S.C. 1962d-5
note), including--
``(i) adequate consideration of the
subgrade;
``(ii) proper filtration;
``(iii) durable components;
``(iv) adequate connection between units;
and
``(v) consideration of additional relevant
information.
``(3) Sites.--
``(A) In general.--Each demonstration project under
the erosion control program shall be carried out at a
privately owned site with substantial public access, or
a publicly owned site, on open coast or on tidal
waters.
``(B) Selection.--The Secretary shall develop
criteria for the selection of sites for the
demonstration projects, including--
``(i) a variety of geographical and
climatic conditions;
``(ii) the size of the population that is
dependent on the beaches for recreation,
protection of homes, or commercial interests;
``(iii) the rate of erosion;
``(iv) significant natural resources or
habitats and environmentally sensitive areas;
and
``(v) significant threatened historic
structures or landmarks.
``(C) Areas.--Demonstration projects under the
erosion control program shall be carried out at not
fewer than 2 sites on each of the shorelines of--
``(i) the Atlantic, Gulf, and Pacific
coasts;
``(ii) the Great Lakes; and
``(iii) the State of Alaska.
``(d) Cooperation.--
``(1) Parties.--The Secretary shall carry out the erosion
control program in cooperation with--
``(A) the Secretary of Agriculture, particularly
with respect to vegetative means of preventing and
controlling shoreline erosion;
``(B) Federal, State, and local agencies;
``(C) private organizations;
``(D) the Coastal Engineering Research Center
established under the first section of Public Law 88-
172 (33 U.S.C. 426-1); and
``(E) university research facilities.
``(2) Agreements.--The cooperation described in paragraph
(1) may include entering into agreements with other Federal,
State, or local agencies or private organizations to carry out
functions described in subsection (c)(1) when appropriate.
``(e) Report.--Not later than 60 days after the conclusion of the
erosion control program, the Secretary shall prepare and submit an
erosion control program final report to the Committee on Environment
and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives. The report shall
include a comprehensive evaluation of the erosion control program and
recommendations regarding the continuation of the erosion control
program.
``(f) Funding.--
``(1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), the Federal
share of the cost of a demonstration project under the erosion
control program shall be determined in accordance with section
3.
``(2) Responsibility.--The cost of and responsibility for
operation and maintenance (excluding monitoring) of a
demonstration project under the erosion control program shall
be borne by non-Federal interests on completion of construction
of the demonstration project.''.
(b) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (e) of the first section of
the Act of August 13, 1946 (60 Stat. 1056, chapter 960; 33 U.S.C.
426e(e)), is amended by striking ``section 3'' and inserting ``section
3 or 5''.
SEC. 334. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS.
(a) Contributions for Environmental and Recreation Projects.--
Section 203(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33
U.S.C. 2325(b)) is amended by striking ``(8662)'' and inserting
``(8862)''.
(b) Challenge Cost-Sharing Program.--The second sentence of section
225(c) of the Act (33 U.S.C. 2328(c)) is amended by striking ``(8662)''
and inserting ``(8862)''.
S 640 RS----2
S 640 RS----3
S 640 RS----4
S 640 RS----5
S 640 RS----6
S 640 RS----7
S 640 RS----8
S 640 RS----9
S 640 RS----10
S 640 RS----11