[Congressional Bills 104th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 134 Introduced in House (IH)]
104th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. CON. RES. 134
Condemning the court-martial of Specialist Michael New of the United
States Army in response to his refusal to wear on his military uniform
the insignia of the United Nations and calling on the President to
vindicate this courageous young man, override his conviction, and
restore him to a place of honor in the Army.
_______________________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 25, 1996
Mr. Bartlett of Maryland (for himself, Mr. Traficant, Mr. Funderburk,
Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. Crane, Mr. Herger, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Coble,
Mr. Packard, Mr. Taylor of North Carolina, Mr. Hostettler, Mrs.
Seastrand, Mr. Wamp, Mr. Stearns, and Mr. Stockman) submitted the
following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on
National Security
_______________________________________________________________________
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Condemning the court-martial of Specialist Michael New of the United
States Army in response to his refusal to wear on his military uniform
the insignia of the United Nations and calling on the President to
vindicate this courageous young man, override his conviction, and
restore him to a place of honor in the Army.
Whereas section 6 of the United Nations Participation Act of 1945 (22 U.S.C.
287d) prohibits the use of the Armed Forces of the United States in
United Nations deployments unless Congress approves of the participation
agreement in advance by appropriate Act or joint resolution;
Whereas the Constitution of the United States (Article I, Section 9) and section
7342 of title 5, United States Code, prohibit members of the Armed
Forces from receiving badges or insignia from a foreign government,
including any international or multinational organization whose members
include any unit of foreign government, without the consent of Congress;
Whereas Congress has never approved a United Nations deployment under section 6
of the United Nations Participation Act of 1945 (22 U.S.C. 287d);
Whereas Congress has never approved the use of any insignia of the United
Nations on uniforms of members of the Armed Forces; and
Whereas, despite the preceding introductory clauses, Army Specialist Michael
New, an American hero, has been convicted by court-martial for refusing
to accept foreign United Nations commanders and wear on his military
uniform the insignia of the United Nations: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),
that Congress condemns the groundless court-martial of Specialist
Michael New of the United States Army in response to his refusal to
accept foreign United Nations commanders and wear on his military
uniform the insignia of the United Nations and calls on the President,
as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces, to vindicate the principles
under which Specialist New made his refusal and to take such action as
may be available to the President to override the conviction of
Specialist New and restore his status with a place of honor in the
Army.
<all>