[Congressional Bills 103th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 218 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

<DOC>

        H.Con.Res.218
                                          Agreed to May 12, 1994        

                       One Hundred Third Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America


                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
 the twenty-fifth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-
                                  four


                          Concurrent Resolution

    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring),


SECTION 1. CONCURRENT RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995.

    (a) Declaration._The Congress determines and declares that this 
resolution is the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 
1995, including the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 1996, 
1997, 1998, and 1999, as required by section 301 of the Congressional 
Budget Act of 1974.
    (b) Table of Contents._The table of contents for this concurrent 
resolution is as follows:
Sec. 1. Concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 1995.

                       TITLE I_LEVELS AND AMOUNTS

Sec. 2. Aggregates.
Sec. 3. Social security.
Sec. 4. Major functional categories.

                      TITLE II_BUDGETARY PROCEDURES

Sec. 21. Sale of Government assets.
Sec. 22. Social Security fire wall point of order in the Senate.
Sec. 23. Enforcing pay-as-you-go.
Sec. 24. Enforcing discretionary spending limits.
Sec. 25. Internal Revenue Service compliance initiative.
Sec. 26. Adjustments for health care reform in the House of 
          Representatives.
Sec. 27. Deficit-neutral reserve fund in the Senate.
Sec. 28. Exercise of rulemaking powers.

                 TITLE III_SENSE OF CONGRESS PROVISIONS

Sec. 31. Controlling growth of entitlement or mandatory spending.
Sec. 32. Sense of the House regarding enactment of certain budget 
          process legislation.
Sec. 33. Sense of the Senate on controlling non-Social Security 
          mandatory spending.
Sec. 34. Sense of the Congress regarding the budgetary accounting of 
          health care reform.
Sec. 35. Sense of the Congress on the costs of illegal immigration.
Sec. 36. Sense of the Congress regarding baselines.
Sec. 37. Sense of the Congress regarding unfunded Federal mandates.
Sec. 38. Closing of loopholes in foreign tax provisions.
Sec. 39. Sense of the Senate regarding tax expenditures.
Sec. 40. Sense of the Congress regarding health service delivery and 
          water infrastructure in the Indian Health Service.
Sec. 41. Sense of the Senate regarding the National Aeronautics and 
          Space Administration.
Sec. 42. Minimum allocation program.
Sec. 43. Policy in Eastern and Central Europe.
Sec. 44. Star Wars (Ballistic Missile Defense).

                       TITLE I_LEVELS AND AMOUNTS

SEC. 2. AGGREGATES.

    The following budgetary levels are appropriate for fiscal years 
1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999:
        (1) Federal revenues._(A) For purposes of comparison with the 
    maximum deficit amount under sections 601(a)(1) and 606 of the 
    Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and for purposes of the 
    enforcement of this resolution_
            (i) The recommended levels of Federal revenues are as 
        follows:
                Fiscal year 1995: $977,700,000,000.
                Fiscal year 1996: $1,031,200,000,000.
                Fiscal year 1997: $1,079,700,000,000.
                Fiscal year 1998: $1,136,400,000,000.
                Fiscal year 1999: $1,190,200,000,000.
            (ii) The amounts by which the aggregate levels of Federal 
        revenues should be increased are as follows:
                Fiscal year 1995: $0.
                Fiscal year 1996: $0.
                Fiscal year 1997: $0.
                Fiscal year 1998: $0.
                Fiscal year 1999: $0.
            (iii) The amounts for Federal Insurance Contributions Act 
        revenues for hospital insurance within the recommended levels 
        of Federal revenues are as follows:
                Fiscal year 1995: $100,300,000,000.
                Fiscal year 1996: $106,300,000,000.
                Fiscal year 1997: $111,900,000,000.
                Fiscal year 1998: $117,800,000,000.
                Fiscal year 1999: $123,700,000,000.
        (B) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Security Act 
    (excluding the receipts and disbursements of the Hospital Insurance 
    Trust Fund)_
            (i) The recommended levels of Federal revenues are as 
        follows:
                Fiscal year 1995: $877,400,000,000.
                Fiscal year 1996: $924,900,000,000.
                Fiscal year 1997: $967,800,000,000.
                Fiscalyear1998:$1,018,600,000,000.
                Fiscalyear1999:$1,066,500,000,000.
            (ii) The amounts by which the aggregate levels of Federal 
        revenues should be increased are as follows:
                Fiscal year 1995: $0.
                Fiscal year 1996: $0.
                Fiscal year 1997: $0.
                Fiscal year 1998: $0.
                Fiscal year 1999: $0.
        (2) New budget authority._(A) For purposes of comparison with 
    the maximum deficit amount under sections 601(a)(1) and 606 of the 
    Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and for purposes of the 
    enforcement of this resolution, the appropriate levels of total new 
    budget authority are as follows:
            Fiscal year 1995: $1,238,300,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1996: $1,308,800,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1997: $1,374,400,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1998: $1,443,900,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1999: $1,526,900,000,000.
        (B) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Security Act 
    (excluding the receipts and disbursements of the Hospital Insurance 
    Trust Fund), the appropriate levels of total new budget authority 
    are as follows:
            Fiscal year 1995: $1,144,900,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1996: $1,207,500,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1997: $1,262,700,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1998: $1,321,000,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1999: $1,389,700,000,000.
        (3) Budget outlays._(A) For purposes of comparison with the 
    maximum deficit amount under sections 601(a)(1) and 606 of the 
    Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and for purposes of the 
    enforcement of this resolution, the appropriate levels of total 
    budget outlays are as follows:
            Fiscal year 1995: $1,217,200,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1996: $1,284,400,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1997: $1,356,600,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1998: $1,418,300,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1999: $1,490,900,000,000.
        (B) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Security Act 
    (excluding the receipts and disbursements of the Hospital Insurance 
    Trust Fund), the appropriate levels of total budget outlays are as 
    follows:
            Fiscal year 1995: $1,124,900,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1996: $1,184,400,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1997: $1,246,200,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1998: $1,297,000,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1999: $1,355,600,000,000.
        (4) Deficits._(A) For purposes of comparison with the maximum 
    deficit amount under sections 601(a)(1) and 606 of the 
    Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and for purposes of the 
    enforcement of this resolution, the amounts of the deficits are as 
    follows:
            Fiscal year 1995: $239,500,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1996: $253,200,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1997: $276,900,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1998: $281,900,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1999: $300,700,000,000.
        (B) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Security Act 
    (excluding the receipts and disbursements of the Hospital Insurance 
    Trust Fund), the amounts of the deficits are as follows:
            Fiscal year 1995: $247,500,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1996: $259,500,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1997: $278,400,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1998: $278,400,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1999: $289,100,000,000.
        (5) Public debt._The appropriate levels of the public debt are 
    as follows:
            Fiscal year 1995: $4,965,100,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1996: $5,281,400,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1997: $5,618,200,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1998: $5,958,600,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1999: $6,308,800,000,000.
        (6) Direct loan obligations._The appropriate levels of total 
    new direct loan obligations are as follows:
            Fiscal year 1995: $26,700,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1996: $32,100,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1997: $33,800,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1998: $35,700,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1999: $37,800,000,000.
        (7) Primary loan guarantee commitments._The appropriate levels 
    of new primary loan guarantee commitments are as follows:
            Fiscal year 1995: $199,700,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1996: $174,400,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1997: $164,600,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1998: $164,100,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1999: $163,500,000,000.

SEC. 3. SOCIAL SECURITY.

    (a) Social Security Revenues._For purposes of Senate enforcement 
under sections 302 and 311 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the 
amounts of revenues of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance 
Trust Fund and the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund are as 
follows:
        Fiscal year 1995: $360,500,000,000.
        Fiscal year 1996: $379,600,000,000.
        Fiscal year 1997: $399,000,000,000.
        Fiscal year 1998: $419,500,000,000.
        Fiscal year 1999: $439,800,000,000.
    (b) Social Security Outlays._For purposes of Senate enforcement 
under sections 302 and 311 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the 
amounts of outlays of the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust 
Fund and the Federal Disability Insurance Trust Fund are as follows:
        Fiscal year 1995: $287,600,000,000.
        Fiscal year 1996: $301,300,000,000.
        Fiscal year 1997: $312,300,000,000.
        Fiscal year 1998: $324,400,000,000.
        Fiscal year 1999: $337,000,000,000.

SEC. 4. MAJOR FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES.

    The Congress determines and declares that the appropriate levels of 
new budget authority, budget outlays, new direct loan obligations, and 
new primary loan guarantee commitments for fiscal years 1995 through 
1999 for each major functional category are:
        (1) National Defense (050):
            Fiscal year 1995:
                (A) New budget authority, $263,800,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $270,700,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1996:
                (A) New budget authority, $255,300,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $261,000,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1997:
                (A) New budget authority, $252,000,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $256,400,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1998:
                (A) New budget authority, $258,700,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $256,600,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1999:
                (A) New budget authority, $265,100,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $257,500,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
        (2) International Affairs (150):
            Fiscal year 1995:
                (A) New budget authority, $19,300,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $18,100,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $3,200,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $18,000,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1996:
                (A) New budget authority, $17,200,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $17,300,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,800,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $18,500,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1997:
                (A) New budget authority, $17,000,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $17,300,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,600,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $18,500,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1998:
                (A) New budget authority, $16,800,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $17,600,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,400,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $18,500,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1999:
                (A) New budget authority, $17,000,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $17,500,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,400,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $16,500,000,000.
        (3) General Science, Space, and Technology (250):
            Fiscal year 1995:
                (A) New budget authority, $17,300,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $17,200,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1996:
                (A) New budget authority, $17,200,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $17,200,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1997:
                (A) New budget authority, $17,300,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $17,300,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1998:
                (A) New budget authority, $17,400,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $17,300,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1999:
                (A) New budget authority, $17,600,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $17,500,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
        (4) Energy (270):
            Fiscal year 1995:
                (A) New budget authority, $6,300,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $5,000,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,400,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1996:
                (A) New budget authority, $5,900,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $5,200,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,500,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1997:
                (A) New budget authority, $5,900,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $5,000,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,500,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1998:
                (A) New budget authority, $6,100,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $4,700,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,500,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1999:
                (A) New budget authority, $5,700,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $4,400,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,500,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
        (5) Natural Resources and Environment (300):
            Fiscal year 1995:
                (A) New budget authority, $21,700,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $21,300,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1996:
                (A) New budget authority, $22,200,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $21,500,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1997:
                (A) New budget authority, $22,100,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $21,600,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1998:
                (A) New budget authority, $22,000,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $21,500,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1999:
                (A) New budget authority, $21,600,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $21,400,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
        (6) Agriculture (350):
            Fiscal year 1995:
                (A) New budget authority, $13,000,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $12,200,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $10,100,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $7,400,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1996:
                (A) New budget authority, $13,500,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $12,400,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $9,700,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $7,400,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1997:
                (A) New budget authority, $14,000,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $12,700,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $9,700,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $7,400,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1998:
                (A) New budget authority, $14,200,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $13,000,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $9,800,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $7,400,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1999:
                (A) New budget authority, $14,700,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $13,500,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $9,900,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $7,400,000,000.
        (7) Commerce and Housing Credit (370):
            Fiscal year 1995:
                (A) New budget authority, $7,700,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, ^$8,200,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,800,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $117,900,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1996:
                (A) New budget authority, $5,300,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, ^$10,800,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $3,000,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $103,200,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1997:
                (A) New budget authority, $5,100,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, ^$3,400,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $3,100,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $95,900,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1998:
                (A) New budget authority, $5,200,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, ^$2,900,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $3,200,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $96,600,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1999:
                (A) New budget authority, $6,200,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, ^$900,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $3,400,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $99,500,000,000.
        (8) Transportation (400):
            Fiscal year 1995:
                (A) New budget authority, $41,900,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $38,800,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $100,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $500,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1996:
                (A) New budget authority, $41,800,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $39,600,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $100,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1997:
                (A) New budget authority, $43,200,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $40,100,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $100,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1998:
                (A) New budget authority, $44,000,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $40,300,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $100,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1999:
                (A) New budget authority, $44,600,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $40,400,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $100,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
        (9) Community and Regional Development (450):
            Fiscal year 1995:
                (A) New budget authority, $9,500,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $9,300,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,200,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $3,600,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1996:
                (A) New budget authority, $9,000,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $8,900,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,200,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $3,600,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1997:
                (A) New budget authority, $9,000,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $9,000,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,200,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $3,600,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1998:
                (A) New budget authority, $9,000,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $9,100,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,200,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $3,600,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1999:
                (A) New budget authority, $9,000,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $9,000,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $2,200,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $3,600,000,000.
        (10) Education, Training, Employment, and Social Services 
    (500):
            Fiscal year 1995:
                (A) New budget authority, $57,700,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $53,700,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $5,500,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $19,000,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1996:
                (A) New budget authority, $58,200,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $55,600,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $11,500,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $14,000,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1997:
                (A) New budget authority, $59,900,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $58,100,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $13,200,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $13,200,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1998:
                (A) New budget authority, $61,700,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $60,600,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $15,100,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $12,300,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1999:
                (A) New budget authority, $63,200,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $62,200,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $16,800,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $11,200,000,000.
        (11) Health (550):
            Fiscal year 1995:
                (A) New budget authority, $124,300,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $122,800,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $400,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1996:
                (A) New budget authority, $136,700,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $135,800,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $300,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1997:
                (A) New budget authority, $151,000,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $149,900,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $200,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1998:
                (A) New budget authority, $166,700,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $165,400,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $100,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1999:
                (A) New budget authority, $184,200,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $182,600,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
        (12) Medicare (570):
            Fiscal year 1995:
                (A) New budget authority, $162,400,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $160,500,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1996:
                (A) New budget authority, $180,500,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $178,200,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1997:
                (A) New budget authority, $198,500,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $196,100,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1998:
                (A) New budget authority, $217,700,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $215,100,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1999:
                (A) New budget authority, $242,300,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $239,100,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
        (13) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Security Act, 
    Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund:
            Fiscal year 1995:
                (A) New budget authority, $56,000,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $55,200,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1996:
                (A) New budget authority, $65,200,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $64,200,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1997:
                (A) New budget authority, $73,300,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $72,200,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1998:
                (A) New budget authority, $81,300,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $80,300,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1999:
                (A) New budget authority, $92,200,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $90,900,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
        (14) Income Security (600):
            Fiscal year 1995:
                (A) New budget authority, $220,800,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $221,200,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1996:
                (A) New budget authority, $235,000,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $229,600,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1997:
                (A) New budget authority, $249,300,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $242,900,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1998:
                (A) New budget authority, $261,200,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $253,200,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1999:
                (A) New budget authority, $273,600,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $264,600,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
        (15) Social Security (650):
            Fiscal year 1995:
                (A) New budget authority, $6,800,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $9,400,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1996:
                (A) New budget authority, $6,300,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $9,400,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1997:
                (A) New budget authority, $8,300,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $11,500,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1998:
                (A) New budget authority, $9,000,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $12,300,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1999:
                (A) New budget authority, $9,800,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $13,200,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
        (16) Veterans Benefits and Services (700):
            Fiscal year 1995:
                (A) New budget authority, $37,200,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $36,600,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,400,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $32,900,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1996:
                (A) New budget authority, $37,600,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $36,600,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,300,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $27,400,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1997:
                (A) New budget authority, $38,500,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $38,300,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,400,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $25,800,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1998:
                (A) New budget authority, $38,600,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $38,500,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,400,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $25,600,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1999:
                (A) New budget authority, $39,700,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $39,600,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $1,500,000,000.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, 
            $25,300,000,000.
        (17) Administration of Justice (750):
            Fiscal year 1995:
                (A) New budget authority, $18,800,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $17,200,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1996:
                (A) New budget authority, $21,300,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $19,400,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1997:
                (A) New budget authority, $22,200,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $21,000,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1998:
                (A) New budget authority, $23,200,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $22,500,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1999:
                (A) New budget authority, $24,500,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $23,500,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
        (18) General Government (800):
            Fiscal year 1995:
                (A) New budget authority, $14,000,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $13,700,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1996:
                (A) New budget authority, $13,500,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $14,700,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1997:
                (A) New budget authority, $13,400,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $13,900,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1998:
                (A) New budget authority, $13,100,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $13,400,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1999:
                (A) New budget authority, $12,800,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $12,800,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
        (19) Net Interest (900):
            Fiscal year 1995:
                (A) New budget authority, $247,100,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $247,100,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1996:
                (A) New budget authority, $267,200,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $267,200,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1997:
                (A) New budget authority, $282,700,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $282,700,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1998:
                (A) New budget authority, $298,500,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $298,500,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1999:
                (A) New budget authority, $315,600,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $315,600,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
        (20) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Security Act, 
    Net Interest (900):
            Fiscal year 1995:
                (A) New budget authority, $257,600,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $257,600,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1996:
                (A) New budget authority, $278,000,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $278,000,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1997:
                (A) New budget authority, $293,500,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $293,500,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1998:
                (A) New budget authority, $309,100,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $309,100,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1999:
                (A) New budget authority, $325,500,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, $325,500,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
        (21) The corresponding levels of gross interest on the public 
    debt are as follows:
            Fiscal year 1995: $311,800,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1996: $331,200,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1997: $347,600,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1998: $365,100,000,000.
            Fiscal year 1999: $384,100,000,000.
        (22) Allowances (920):
            Fiscal year 1995:
                (A) New budget authority, ^$6,600,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, ^$4,700,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1996:
                (A) New budget authority, ^$4,400,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, ^$3,900,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1997:
                (A) New budget authority, ^$4,500,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, ^$3,300,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1998:
                (A) New budget authority, ^$7,900,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, ^$7,100,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1999:
                (A) New budget authority, ^$8,700,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, ^$11,000,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
        (23) Undistributed Offsetting Receipts (950):
            Fiscal year 1995:
                (A) New budget authority, ^$44,700,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, ^$44,700,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1996:
                (A) New budget authority, ^$30,500,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, ^$30,500,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1997:
                (A) New budget authority, ^$30,500,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, ^$30,500,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1998:
                (A) New budget authority, ^$31,300,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, ^$31,300,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1999:
                (A) New budget authority, ^$31,600,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, ^$31,600,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
        (24) For purposes of section 710 of the Social Security Act, 
    Undistributed Offsetting Receipts (950):
            Fiscal year 1995:
                (A) New budget authority, ^$42,200,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, ^$42,200,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1996:
                (A) New budget authority, ^$27,300,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, ^$27,300,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1997:
                (A) New budget authority, ^$27,800,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, ^$27,800,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1998:
                (A) New budget authority, ^$28,400,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, ^$28,400,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.
            Fiscal year 1999:
                (A) New budget authority, ^$28,600,000,000.
                (B) Outlays, ^$28,600,000,000.
                (C) New direct loan obligations, $0.
                (D) New primary loan guarantee commitments, $0.

                     TITLE II_BUDGETARY PROCEDURES

SEC. 21. SALE OF GOVERNMENT ASSETS.

    (a) Sense of the Congress._It is the sense of the Congress that_
        (1) from time to time the United States Government should sell 
    assets; and
        (2) the amounts realized from such asset sales will not recur 
    on an annual basis and do not reduce the demand for credit.
    (b) Budgetary Treatment._For purposes of points of order under this 
concurrent resolution and the Congressional Budget and Impoundment 
Control Act of 1974, the amounts realized from sales of assets (other 
than loan assets) shall not be scored with respect to the level of 
budget authority, outlays, or revenues.
    (c) Definitions._For purposes of this section_
        (1) the term ``sale of an asset'' shall have the same meaning 
    as under section 250(c)(21) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency 
    Deficit Control Act of 1985 (as amended by the Budget Enforcement 
    Act of 1990); and
        (2) the term shall not include asset sales mandated by law 
    before September 18, 1987, and routine, ongoing asset sales at 
    levels consistent with agency operations in fiscal year 1986.
    (d) Sunset._Subsections (a) through (c) of this section shall 
expire September 30, 1998.
    (e) Conforming Amendment._Section 8 of House Concurrent Resolution 
64 (103d Congress), section 8 of House Concurrent Resolution 287 (102d 
Congress), section 7 of House Concurrent Resolution 121 (102d 
Congress), section 5 of House Concurrent Resolution 310 (101st 
Congress), section 6 of House Concurrent Resolution 106 (101st 
Congress), section 4 of House Concurrent Resolution 268 (100th 
Congress), and sections 7 and 8 of House Concurrent Resolution 93 
(100th Congress) are repealed.
  SEC. 22. SOCIAL SECURITY FIRE WALL POINT OF ORDER IN THE SENATE.
    (a) Application of Section 301(i)._Notwithstanding any other rule 
of the Senate, in the Senate, the point of order established under 
section 301(i) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 shall apply to 
any concurrent resolution on the budget for any fiscal year (as 
reported and as amended), amendments thereto, or any conference report 
thereon.
    (b) Conforming Amendment._Section 10(b) of House Concurrent 
Resolution 64 (103d Congress) and section 12(b) of House Concurrent 
Resolution 287 (102d Congress) are repealed.

SEC. 23. ENFORCING PAY-AS-YOU-GO.

    (a) Purpose._The Senate declares that it is essential to_
        (1) ensure continued compliance with the deficit reduction 
    embodied in the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993; and
        (2) continue the pay-as-you-go enforcement system.
    (b) Point of Order._
        (1) In general._It shall not be in order in the Senate to 
    consider any direct-spending or receipts legislation (as defined in 
    paragraph (3)) that would increase the deficit for any one of the 
    three applicable time periods (as defined in paragraph (2)) as 
    measured pursuant to paragraphs (4) and (5).
        (2) Applicable time periods._For purposes of this subsection, 
    the term ``applicable time period'' means any one of the three 
    following periods_
            (A) the first fiscal year covered by the most recently 
        adopted concurrent resolution on the budget;
            (B) the period of the 5 fiscal years covered by the most 
        recently adopted concurrent resolution on the budget; or
            (C) the period of the 5 fiscal years following the first 5 
        years covered by the most recently adopted concurrent 
        resolution on the budget.
        (3) Direct-spending or receipts legislation._For purposes of 
    this subsection, the term ``direct-spending or receipts 
    legislation'' shall_
            (A) include any bill, joint resolution, amendment, motion, 
        or conference report to which this subsection otherwise 
        applies;
            (B) exclude concurrent resolutions on the budget;
            (C) exclude full funding of, and continuation of, the 
        deposit insurance guarantee commitment in effect on the date of 
        enactment of the Budget Enforcement Act of 1990;
            (D) exclude emergency provisions so designated under 
        section 252(e) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit 
        Control Act of 1985;
            (E) include the estimated amount of savings in direct-
        spending programs applicable to that fiscal year resulting from 
        the prior year's sequestration under the Balanced Budget and 
        Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, if any (except for any 
        amounts sequestered as a result of a net deficit increase in 
        the fiscal year immediately preceding the prior fiscal year); 
        and
            (F) except as otherwise provided in this subsection, 
        include all direct-spending legislation as that term is 
        interpreted for purposes of the Balanced Budget and Emergency 
        Deficit Control Act of 1985.
        (4) Baseline._Estimates prepared pursuant to this section shall 
    use the baseline used for the most recent concurrent resolution on 
    the budget, and for years beyond those covered by that concurrent 
    resolution, shall abide by the requirements of section 257 of the 
    Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985, except 
    that references to ``outyears'' in that section shall be deemed to 
    apply to any year (other than the budget year) covered by any one 
    of the time periods defined in paragraph (2) of this subsection.
        (5) Prior surplus available._If direct-spending or receipts 
    legislation increases the deficit when taken individually (as a 
    bill, joint resolution, amendment, motion, or conference report, as 
    the case may be), then it must also increase the deficit when taken 
    together with all direct-spending and receipts legislation enacted 
    after the date of enactment of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation 
    Act of 1993, in order to violate the prohibition of this 
    subsection.
    (c) Waiver._This section may be waived or suspended in the Senate 
only by the affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members, duly 
chosen and sworn.
    (d) Appeals._Appeals in the Senate from the decisions of the Chair 
relating to any provision of this section shall be limited to 1 hour, 
to be equally divided between, and controlled by, the appellant and the 
manager of the bill or joint resolution, as the case may be. An 
affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members of the Senate, duly 
chosen and sworn, shall be required in the Senate to sustain an appeal 
of the ruling of the Chair on a point of order raised under this 
section.
    (e) Determination of Budget Levels._For purposes of this section, 
the levels of new budget authority, outlays, and receipts for a fiscal 
year shall be determined on the basis of estimates made by the 
Committee on the Budget of the Senate.
    (f) Conforming Amendment._Section 12 of House Concurrent Resolution 
64 (103d Congress) is repealed.
    (g) Technical Correction._Notwithstanding section 275(b) of the 
Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (as amended 
by sections 13112(b) and 13208(b)(3) of the Budget Enforcement Act of 
1990), the second sentence of section 904(c) of the Congressional 
Budget Act of 1974 (except insofar as it relates to section 313 of that 
Act) and the final sentence of section 904(d) of that Act (except 
insofar as it relates to section 313 of that Act) shall continue to 
have effect as rules of the Senate through (but no later than) 
September 30, 1998.
    (h) Sunset._Subsections (a) through (e) of this section shall 
expire September 30, 1998.

SEC. 24. ENFORCING DISCRETIONARY SPENDING LIMITS.

    (a) Discretionary Spending Limits._
        (1) Definition._For the purposes of enforcing this section in 
    the Senate, the discretionary spending limits in section 
    601(a)(2)(F) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (as adjusted) 
    are reduced by the following amounts_
            (A) with respect to fiscal year 1996, $4,000,000,000 in 
        budget authority and $5,400,000,000 in outlays;
            (B) with respect to fiscal year 1997, $10,700,000,000 in 
        budget authority and $2,400,000,000 in outlays; and
            (C) with respect to fiscal year 1998, $4,100,000,000 in 
        budget authority and $500,000,000 in outlays.
        (2) Point of order in the senate._(A) Except as provided in 
    subparagraph (B), it shall not be in order in the Senate to 
    consider any concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 
    1996, 1997, or 1998 (or amendment or motion on such a resolution) 
    that recommends discretionary spending levels for the first fiscal 
    year covered by that resolution that would exceed the discretionary 
    spending limits as reduced in this section.
        (B) This subsection shall not apply if a declaration of war by 
    the Congress is in effect or if a joint resolution pursuant to 
    section 258 of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control 
    Act of 1985 has been enacted.
    (b) Waiver._This section may be waived or suspended in the Senate 
only by the affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members, duly 
chosen and sworn.
    (c) Appeals._Appeals in the Senate from the decisions of the Chair 
relating to any provision of this section shall be limited to 1 hour, 
to be equally divided between, and controlled by, the appellant and the 
manager of the concurrent resolution, bill, or joint resolution, as the 
case may be. An affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members of the 
Senate, duly chosen and sworn, shall be required in the Senate to 
sustain an appeal of the ruling of the Chair on a point of order raised 
under this section.
    (d) Determination of Budget Levels._For purposes of this section, 
the levels of new budget authority, outlays, and revenues for a fiscal 
year shall be determined on the basis of estimates made by the 
Committee on the Budget of the Senate.

SEC. 25. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE COMPLIANCE INITIATIVE.

    (a)(1) Adjustments._For purposes of points of order under the 
Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 and concurrent 
resolutions on the budget_
        (A) the discretionary spending limits under section 601(a)(2) 
    of that Act (and those limits as cumulatively adjusted) for the 
    current fiscal year and each outyear;
        (B) the allocations to the Committees on Appropriations under 
    sections 302(a) and 602(a) of that Act;
        (C) the appropriate budgetary aggregates in the most recently 
    agreed to concurrent resolution on the budget; and
        (D) the maximum deficit amount under section 601(a)(1) of that 
    Act (and that amount as cumulatively adjusted) for the current 
    fiscal year,
shall be adjusted to reflect the amounts of additional new budget 
authority or additional outlays (as defined in paragraph (2)) reported 
by the Committee on Appropriations in appropriations Acts (or by the 
committee of conference on such legislation) for the Internal Revenue 
Service compliance initiative activities in any fiscal year, but not to 
exceed in any fiscal year $405,000,000 in new budget authority and 
$405,000,000 in outlays.
    (2) Additional Amounts._As used in this section, the terms 
``additional new budget authority'' or ``additional outlays'' shall 
mean, for any fiscal year, budget authority or outlays (as the case may 
be) in excess of the amounts requested for that fiscal year for the 
Internal Revenue Service in the President's Budget for fiscal year 
1995.
    (b) Revised Limits, Allocations, and Aggregates._Upon the reporting 
of legislation pursuant to subsection (a), and again upon the 
submission of a conference report on such legislation (if a conference 
report is submitted), the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of 
the Senate or the House of Representatives (as the case may be) shall 
submit to that Chairman's respective House appropriately revised_
        (1) discretionary spending limits under section 601(a)(2) of 
    the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (and those limits as 
    cumulatively adjusted) for the current fiscal year and each 
    outyear;
        (2) allocations to the Committees on Appropriations under 
    sections 302(a) and 602(a) of that Act;
        (3) appropriate budgetary aggregates in the most recently 
    agreed to concurrent resolution on the budget; and
        (4) maximum deficit amount under section 601(a)(1) of that Act 
    (and that amount as cumulatively adjusted) for the current fiscal 
    year,
to carry out this subsection. These revised discretionary spending 
limits, allocations, and aggregates shall be considered for purposes of 
congressional enforcement under that Act as the discretionary spending 
limits, allocations, and aggregates.
    (c) Reporting Revised Suballocations._The Committees on 
Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives may 
report appropriately revised suballocations pursuant to sections 
302(b)(1) and 602(b)(1) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 to 
carry out this section.
    (d) Contingencies._
        (1) The Internal Revenue Service and the Treasury Department 
    have certified that they are firmly committed to the principles of 
    privacy, confidentiality, courtesy, and protection of taxpayer 
    rights. To this end, the Internal Revenue Service and the Treasury 
    Department have explicitly committed to initiate and implement 
    educational programs for any new employees hired as a result of the 
    compliance initiative made possible by this section.
        (2) This section shall not apply to any additional new budget 
    authority or additional outlays unless_
            (A) in the Senate, the Chairman of the Budget Committee 
        certifies, based upon information from the Congressional Budget 
        Office, the General Accounting Office, and the Internal Revenue 
        Service (as well as from any other sources he deems relevant), 
        that such budget authority or outlays will not increase the 
        total of the Federal budget deficits over the next five years; 
        and
            (B) any funds made available pursuant to such budget 
        authority or outlays are available only for the purpose of 
        carrying out Internal Revenue Service compliance initiative 
        activities.
  SEC. 26. ADJUSTMENTS FOR HEALTH CARE REFORM IN THE HOUSE OF 
      REPRESENTATIVES.
    (a) In the House of Representatives, if health care reform 
legislation is reported (including by a committee of conference), 
budget authority, outlays, and new entitlement authority shall be 
allocated to committees, and the total levels of budget authority, 
outlays, and revenues shall be adjusted, to reflect such legislation if 
the legislation in the form in which it will be considered would not 
increase the total deficit for the period of fiscal years 1995 through 
1999.
    (b) Upon reporting of legislation described in subsection (a) and 
again upon submission of a conference report on such legislation, the 
chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the House of Representatives 
shall publish in the Congressional Record revised allocations under 
section 602(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and revised 
levels of total budget authority, outlays, and revenues to carry out 
this section. In the House of Representatives, such allocations and 
totals shall be considered as the allocations and aggregates under this 
resolution.

SEC. 27. DEFICIT-NEUTRAL RESERVE FUND IN THE SENATE.

    (a)(1) Budget Authority and Outlay Allocations._In the Senate, 
budget authority and outlays may be allocated (as provided under 
subsection (c)) to a committee (or committees) for direct-spending 
legislation that increases funding for any of the purposes described in 
subsection (b)(1) within that committee's jurisdiction, if, to the 
extent that this concurrent resolution on the budget does not include 
the costs of that legislation, the enactment of that legislation will 
not increase (by virtue of either contemporaneous or previously passed 
deficit reduction) the deficit in this resolution for_
        (A) fiscal year 1995; or
        (B) the period of fiscal years 1995 through 1999.
    (2) Budget Authority and Outlay Allocations and Revenue 
Aggregates._In the Senate, budget authority and outlays may be 
allocated to a committee (or committees) and the revenue aggregates may 
be reduced (as provided under subsection (c)) for direct-spending or 
receipts legislation in furtherance of any of the purposes described in 
subsection (b)(2) within that committee's jurisdiction, if, to the 
extent that this concurrent resolution on the budget does not include 
the costs of that legislation, the enactment of that legislation will 
not increase (by virtue of either contemporaneous or previously passed 
deficit reduction) the deficit in this resolution for_
        (A) fiscal year 1995; or
        (B) the period of fiscal years 1995 through 1999.
    (3) Outlay-neutral Budget Authority Allocations._In the Senate, 
budget authority may be allocated (as provided under subsection (c)) to 
a committee (or committees) for any direct-spending legislation within 
that committee's jurisdiction, if, to the extent that this concurrent 
resolution on the budget does not include the costs of that 
legislation, the enactment of that legislation will not increase (by 
virtue of either contemporaneous or previously passed outlay 
reductions) the deficit or aggregate outlays in this resolution for_
        (A) fiscal year 1995; or
        (B) the period of fiscal years 1995 through 1999.
    (b)(1) Purposes Under Subsection (a)(1)._Budget authority and 
outlay allocations may be revised under subsection (a)(1) for 
legislation_
        (A) to provide comprehensive training or job search assistance 
    (including reemployment or job training programs or Pdislocated 
    worker programs), or to reform unemployment compensation, or to 
    provide for other related programs;
        (B) to preserve or rebuild the United States maritime 
    Pindustry;
        (C) to reform the financing of Federal elections; or
        (D) to reform the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
    Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980.
    (2) Purposes Under Subsection (a)(2)._Budget authority and outlay 
allocations may be revised or the revenue floor reduced under 
subsection (a)(2) for_
        (A) legislation to improve the well-being of families through 
    welfare or other reforms (including promoting self-sufficiency 
    through improvements in job training or employment programs), to 
    provide for services to support or protect children (including 
    assuring increased parental support for children through 
    improvements in the child support enforcement program), or to 
    improve the health, nutrition, or care of children;
        (B) to make continuing improvements in ongoing health care 
    programs, to provide for comprehensive health care reform, to 
    control health care costs, or to accomplish other health care 
    reforms;
        (C) trade-related legislation (including legislation to 
    implement the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and 
    Trade or to extend the Generalized System of Preferences);
        (D) reforms relating to the Pension Benefit Guaranty 
    Corporation (including legislation to improve the funding of 
    government-insured pension plans, to protect plan participants, or 
    to limit growth in exposure of the Pension Benefit Guaranty 
    Corporation) or other employee benefit-related legislation;
        (E) reforms relating to providing for simplified collection of 
    employment taxes on domestic services;
        (F) reforms to consolidate the supervision of depository 
    institutions insured under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act; or
        (G) initiatives to preserve United States energy security.
    (c) Revised Allocations and Aggregates._
        (1) Upon reporting._Upon the reporting of legislation pursuant 
    to subsection (a), and again upon the submission of a conference 
    report on that legislation (if a conference report is submitted), 
    the chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the Senate may 
    submit to the Senate appropriately revised allocations under 
    sections 302(a) and 602(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 
    and revised aggregates to carry out this section.
        (2) Adjustments for amendments._If the chairman of the 
    Committee on the Budget submits an adjustment under this section 
    for legislation in furtherance of the purpose described in 
    subsection (b)(2)(B), upon the offering of an amendment to that 
    legislation that would necessitate such a submission, the chairman 
    shall submit to the Senate appropriately revised allocations under 
    sections 302(a) and 602(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 
    and revised aggregates, if the enactment of that legislation (as 
    proposed to be amended) will not increase (by virtue of either 
    contemporaneous or previously passed deficit reduction) the deficit 
    in this resolution for_
            (A) fiscal year 1995; or
            (B) the period of fiscal years 1995 through 1999.
    (d) Effect of Revised Allocations and Aggregates._Revised 
allocations and aggregates submitted under subsection (c) shall be 
considered for the purposes of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 as 
allocations and aggregates contained in this concurrent resolution on 
the budget.
    (e) Reporting Revised Subdivisions._The appropriate committee may 
report appropriately revised subdivisions of allocations pursuant to 
sections 302(b)(2) and 602(b)(2) of the Congressional Budget Act of 
1974 to carry out this section.

SEC. 28. EXERCISE OF RULEMAKING POWERS.

    The Congress adopts the provisions of this title_
        (1) as an exercise of the rulemaking power of the Senate and 
    the House of Representatives, respectively, and as such they shall 
    be considered as part of the rules of each House, or of that House 
    to which they specifically apply, and such rules shall supersede 
    other rules only to the extent that they are inconsistent 
    therewith; and
        (2) with full recognition of the constitutional right of either 
    House to change those rules (so far as they relate to that House) 
    at any time, in the same manner, and to the same extent as in the 
    case of any other rule of that House.

                 TITLE III_SENSE OF CONGRESS PROVISIONS

  SEC. 31. CONTROLLING GROWTH OF ENTITLEMENT OR MANDATORY SPENDING.
    It is the sense of the Congress that legislation should be enacted 
providing enforceable limits to control the growth of entitlement or 
mandatory spending.
  SEC. 32. SENSE OF THE HOUSE REGARDING ENACTMENT OF CERTAIN BUDGET 
      PROCESS LEGISLATION.
    It is the sense of the House of Representatives that the following 
legislation should be enacted:
        (1) Legislation providing enforceable limits to control the 
    growth of entitlement or mandatory spending.
        (2) Amendments to the Budget Enforcement Act of 1990 to 
    establish a regular procedure to provide assistance for disasters 
    and other emergencies without adding to the deficit.
        (3) Legislation granting the President expedited rescission 
    authority over appropriations measures, as provided by H.R. 1578, 
    as passed the House.
  SEC. 33. SENSE OF THE SENATE ON CONTROLLING NON-SOCIAL SECURITY 
      MANDATORY SPENDING.
    It is the sense of the Senate that the Congress should_
        (1) after enacting health care reform legislation, enact annual 
    caps to control the growth of entitlement or mandatory spending;
        (2) include within these caps all mandatory spending programs 
    except Social Security, deposit insurance, and net interest;
        (3) provide that these caps shall be set so that programs 
    providing benefits to individuals may grow for inflation, changes 
    in the numbers of beneficiaries, and an additional growth 
    allowance;
        (4) provide that these caps shall be adjusted annually in the 
    President's budget for changes in inflation and the number of 
    beneficiaries since Congress enacted the caps (excluding any 
    changes due to legislation);
        (5) provide an enforcement mechanism in the event that total 
    mandatory spending exceeds the caps; and
        (6) enact caps on tax expenditures similar to those for 
    mandatory spending so as to ensure that reductions in Federal 
    spending for mandatory programs are not achieved by shifting 
    spending to tax expenditures.
  SEC. 34. SENSE OF THE CONGRESS REGARDING THE BUDGETARY ACCOUNTING OF 
      HEALTH CARE REFORM.
    It is the sense of the Congress that_
        (1) the Congress should measure the costs and benefits of all 
    health care reform legislation against a uniform set of economic 
    and technical assumptions;
        (2) before enacting major changes in the health care system, 
    the Congress should have available to it reliable estimates of the 
    costs of competing plans prepared in a comparable manner; and
        (3) the Congress should account for all financial transactions 
    associated with Federal health care reform legislation.
  SEC. 35. SENSE OF THE CONGRESS ON THE COSTS OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION.
    (a) Findings._The Congress finds that_
        (1) the Federal Government is solely responsible for setting 
    and enforcing national immigration policy;
        (2) the Federal Government has not adequately enforced 
    immigration laws;
        (3) this weak enforcement has imposed financial costs on State 
    and local governments;
        (4) the Federal Government has failed to investigate and 
    prosecute Federal wage and hour violations, thus creating 
    incentives to hire persons illegally in the United States and 
    exacerbating the problem of illegal immigration;
        (5) States must incur costs for incarcerating undocumented 
    persons convicted of State and local crimes, educating undocumented 
    children, providing emergency medical services to undocumented 
    persons, and providing services incidental to admission of refugees 
    under the Refugee Admissions and Resettlement Program; and
        (6) the Federal Government has an obligation to reimburse State 
    and local governments for costs resulting from the costs described 
    in this subsection.
    (b) Sense of Congress._It is the sense of the Congress that, in 
setting forth the budget authority and outlay amounts in this 
resolution, the Congress intends that funding should be provided to 
reimburse State and local governments for the costs associated with_
        (1) elementary and secondary education for undocumented 
    children;
        (2) emergency medical assistance to undocumented persons;
        (3) incarceration and parole of criminal aliens; and
        (4) services incidental to admission of refugees under the 
    Refugee Admissions and Resettlement Program.

SEC. 36. SENSE OF THE CONGRESS REGARDING BASELINES.

    (a) Findings._The Congress finds that_
        (1) the baseline budget shows the likely course of Federal 
    revenues and spending if policies remain unchanged;
        (2) baseline budgeting has given rise to the practice of 
    calculating policy changes from an inflated spending level; and
        (3) the baseline concept has been misused to portray policies 
    that would simply slow down the increase in spending as spending 
    reductions.
    (b) Sense of Congress._It is the sense of the Congress that_
        (1) the President should submit a budget that compares proposed 
    spending levels for the budget year with the current year; and
        (2) the starting point for deliberations on a budget resolution 
    should be the current year.
  SEC. 37. SENSE OF THE CONGRESS REGARDING UNFUNDED FEDERAL MANDATES.
    It is the sense of the Congress that_
        (1) the Federal Government should not shift the costs of 
    administering Federal programs to State and local governments;
        (2) the Federal Government's share of entitlement programs 
    should not be capped or otherwise decreased without providing 
    States authority to amend their financial or programmatic 
    responsibilities to continue meeting the mandated service; and
        (3) Congress should develop a mechanism to ensure that costs of 
    mandates are considered during agencies' development of regulations 
    and congressional deliberations on legislation.

SEC. 38. CLOSING OF LOOPHOLES IN FOREIGN TAX PROVISIONS.

    (a) Findings._The Senate finds that_
        (1) there is evidence suggesting that foreign-controlled 
    corporations doing business in the United States do not pay their 
    fair share of taxes;
        (2) over 70 percent of foreign-controlled corporations doing 
    business in the United States pay no Federal income tax;
        (3) the United States Department of the Treasury has limited 
    its ability to protect the revenue base in the case of cross-border 
    transactions, to the detriment of taxpayers engaged solely in 
    domestic transactions;
        (4) the Department of the Treasury has been using antiquated 
    accounting concepts to deal with sophisticated multinational 
    corporations;
        (5) substantial Federal revenues are lost annually due to the 
    inability of the Internal Revenue Service to enforce the ``arm's 
    length'' transaction rule, along with substantial amounts spent on 
    administration and litigation; and
        (6) the Federal income tax laws provide a financial incentive 
    for domestic taxpayers to operate abroad by granting them deferral 
    of United States taxes on income earned abroad.
    (b) Sense of the Senate._It is the sense of the Senate that deficit 
reduction should be achieved, in part, by ending loopholes and 
enforcement breakdowns that now foster the underpayment of taxes on 
income from cross-border transactions and that subsidize the flight of 
domestic businesses and jobs out of the United States, by means 
including_
        (1) the adoption of a more streamlined and efficient method of 
    enforcing Federal tax laws involving multinational corporations, 
    especially those based abroad, and in particular, the use by the 
    Treasury Department of a formulaic approach in cases in which the 
    current ``arm's length'' transaction rules do not work; and
        (2) a repeal of tax subsidies for domestic businesses that 
    operate abroad in tax havens and then ship their products back into 
    the United States.

SEC. 39. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING TAX EXPENDITURES.

    (a) Findings._The Senate finds that tax expenditures_
        (1) are growing significantly;
        (2) may have the same effect as direct Federal spending; and
        (3) should be subject to the same level of budgetary review as 
    direct spending.
    (b) Sense of the Senate._It is the sense of the Senate that_
        (1) the Congress should consider targets for the growth in tax 
    expenditures similar to the targets for the growth of mandatory 
    spending;
        (2) any reconciliation instructions included in a budget 
    resolution should specify these targets; and
        (3) such targets should be enforceable separately from any 
    revenue targets included in the reconciliation instructions.
  SEC. 40. SENSE OF THE CONGRESS REGARDING HEALTH SERVICE DELIVERY AND 
      WATER INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE.
    It is the sense of the Congress that_
        (1) sufficient funding should be provided to the Indian Health 
    Service to ensure that Indian Health Service hospitals and 
    outpatient facilities in existence on the date of enactment of this 
    resolution, and Indian Health Service hospitals and outpatient 
    facilities scheduled to open during fiscal years 1994, 1995, and 
    1996, are fully staffed with the appropriate number of health care 
    professionals needed to meet the health and medical needs of the 
    American Indians and Alaska Natives who depend on the Indian Health 
    Service for health care; and
        (2) sufficient funding should be provided to the Indian Health 
    Service to ensure that the Indian Health Service is capable of 
    meeting basic public health and safety and sanitation requirements 
    on Indian lands through timely and proper water infrastructure 
    construction and upgrades.
  SEC. 41. SENSE OF THE SENATE REGARDING THE NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND 
      SPACE ADMINISTRATION.
    It is the sense of the Senate that the budget authority and outlay 
figures for function 250 in this resolution do not assume any amounts 
for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration for any fiscal 
year from 1995 through 1999 in excess of the amounts proposed by the 
President for such fiscal year.

SEC. 42. MINIMUM ALLOCATION PROGRAM.

    (a) Findings._The Senate finds that_
        (1) the minimum allocation program was established in 1982 to 
    address inequities in the funding formula for Federal-aid highways;
        (2) the minimum allocation program was designed to provide the 
    greatest degree of flexibility practicable to States that receive 
    funding under the formula referred to in paragraph (1) and includes 
    an exemption of the apportionments from the obligation ceiling;
        (3) the minimum allocation program provides additional 
    flexibility by allowing a State a 4-year period during which 
    amounts apportioned to the State may be obligated;
        (4) the budget of the United States Government for fiscal year 
    1995 submitted by the President to Congress proposes to include 
    minimum allocation apportionments under the obligation ceiling and 
    also proposes to limit the authority of States to obligate 
    apportionments under the minimum allocation program to 67 percent 
    of the amount of the apportionments; and
        (5) States have planned transportation programs on the basis of 
    the provisions of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency 
    Act of 1991, and the amendments made by the Act, relating to 
    minimum allocation that confirmed core commitments to exemption and 
    flexibility.
    (b) Sense of the Senate._It is the sense of the Senate that_
        (1) the minimum allocation program should remain exempt from 
    the obligation ceiling; and
        (2) the flexibility of the minimum allocation program should be 
    an enduring and critical component of the provision of Federal 
    assistance to States for Federal-aid highways.
    (c) Definitions._As used in this section:
        (1) Federal-aid highways._The term ``Federal-aid highways'' has 
    the meaning provided the term in section 101 of title 23, United 
    States Code.
        (2) Minimum allocation program._The term ``minimum allocation 
    program'' means the program of allocation of funding to States 
    under section 157 of title 23, United States Code.
        (3) Obligation ceiling._The term ``obligation ceiling'' means 
    the obligation ceiling under section 1002 of the Intermodal Surface 
    Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991.

SEC. 43. POLICY IN EASTERN AND CENTRAL EUROPE.

    It is the sense of the Congress that levels of spending set forth 
in this resolution regarding the International Affairs (150) budget 
category include an assumption that the United States will oppose, 
consistent with provisions contained in the Freedom Support Act and the 
Foreign Assistance Appropriations Act of 1994, attempts by the Russian 
Federation to intimidate, use military force or engage in economic 
coercion to establish a sphere of influence over the former republics 
of the Soviet Union, the Baltics, or Central and Eastern European 
nations.

SEC. 44. STAR WARS (BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE).

    It is the sense of the Senate that given the Federal budget 
deficit, the real reductions in discretionary spending in this 
resolution, and the existence of many more worthy programs competing 
for this funding, spending for the Star Wars (Ballistic Missile 
Defense) must not exceed the fiscal year 1994 appropriated level.
Attest:







                                 Clerk of the House of Representatives.

Attest:







                                               Secretary of the Senate.