Each year the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) collaborates with the Food and Nutrition Service, Foreign Agricultural Service and the U.S. Agency for International Development to purchase and distribute over $4 billion of U.S. agricultural products for distribution to schools, food banks, Tribal organizations, and international food aid operations, among others. AMS solicits for a large variety of products from vendors qualified to do business with the Agency. It is AMS's ongoing goal to increase the number of small and underserved businesses participating in the USDA food procurement program, as well as to increase the availability of culturally appropriate foods.

President Biden issued Executive Order (E.O.) E.O. 14017, “America's Supply Chains”; E.O. 13985, “Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government”; and E.O. 14036, “Promoting Competition in the American Economy.” E.O. 14017 focuses on the need for resilient, diverse, and secure supply chains to ensure U.S. economic prosperity and national security. E.O. 13985 focuses on identifying potential barriers that underserved communities and individuals may face in taking advantage of agency contracting opportunities. E.O. 14036 focuses on reviewing the state of competition within the agricultural market, including areas where a lack of competition may be of concern. In support of these executive orders, AMS is focusing on identifying and reducing barriers to becoming an approved vendor in order to increase competition and the availability of vital agricultural commodities for use in the USDA's nutrition assistance programs.

Commodity food products are purchased and delivered to schools, food banks, and households in communities on a domestic and global scale. Small and underserved companies play a crucial role in supplying food to the USDA. Last year, AMS awarded a record $1.4 billion dollars to small businesses through prime contracts, of which 13.73% of the contracts were awarded to small, underserved businesses; yet there is a need for more participation in the commodity procurement program. In addition to increasing the participation of small and underserved businesses, AMS is interested in purchasing larger volumes of halal, kosher, organic, and other culturally appropriate products.

This notice requests comments and information from the public to assist AMS in updating CPP's Small Business and New Vendor Strategy as appropriate.

AMS is particularly interested in comments and information directed to the policy objectives listed in E.O. 14017, E.O. 14036, and E.O. 13985 as they affect the U.S. and global supply chains. AMS is seeking input on the following topics:

i. Government business practices that might inhibit or deter small or underserved businesses, as well as halal, kosher, and organic providers, from participating in the USDA commodity procurement program, i.e., by producing and/or providing goods, services, and materials for CPP contracts;

ii. Regulations and business practices which may strain rather than strengthen the relationship between CPP and these providers;

iii. The use of past performance information during the vendor qualification process, source selection, contract performance, and the collection of such information;

iv. Increasing the CPP's utilization of small and underserved businesses, as well as halal, kosher, and organic providers;

v. CPP's efforts to assist businesses that seek to do business with the government, including experiences in working with CPP's contracting workforce;

vi. Contracting timelines ( e.g., annual procurement schedule, length of advertising of opportunities, time between bid opening and contract award, delivery lead times, etc.) and the impact of those timelines;

vii. The availability of skilled labor and other personnel to sustain a competitive ecosystem;

viii. Policy recommendations or suggested executive, legislative, regulatory action to foster more resilient supply chains, greater competition in the agricultural market, and/or more small or underserved business participation in the procurement process;

ix. Any additional comments concerning small or underserved businesses and halal, kosher, organic, or others relevant to the assessment of supply chain resilience.

AMS plans to hold a listening session open to the public so that interested parties can provide verbal as well as written input. A date and time will be provided.

AMS encourages respondents to structure their comments using the same text above as identifiers for the areas of inquiry to which they are responding. This will assist the AMS in more easily reviewing and summarizing the comments received in response to these specific areas. For example, a commenter submitting comments responsive to (i), “Government business practices that might inhibit or deter small or underserved businesses, as well as halal, kosher, and organic providers, from participating in the USDA commodity procurement program, i.e., by producing and/or providing goods, services, and materials for CPP contracts” would use that same text as a heading in the public comment followed by the commenter's specific comments in this area. AMS encourages the use of an executive summary at the beginning of all comments and information to assist AMS in a more efficient review of the submitted documents.

Title: Case-Control Study on Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza in Poultry.

OMB Control Number: 0579-0483.

Type of Request: Extension of approval of an information collection.

Abstract: Under the Animal Health Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 8301 et seq. ), the Secretary of Agriculture is authorized to protect the health of livestock, poultry, and aquaculture populations in the United States by preventing the introduction and interstate spread of serious diseases and pests of livestock, poultry, and aquaculture, and for eradicating such diseases within the United States when feasible. This authority has been delegated to the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS).

Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) is an infectious and fatal disease of poultry. Between February and June 2022, APHIS mobilized over 1,125 employees to respond to outbreaks of HPAI within the United States. As of the end of May 2022, nearly $800 million in Federal expenditures has been authorized to support emergency response work in relation to HPAI, which affected over 40 million birds.

Avian influenza viruses vary in transmissibility and ability to cause disease symptoms. Evidence suggests that the predominance of infections in 2022 have been due to independent wild bird introductions. As the risk of a resurgence of new infections increases, it is critical to identify current risk factors to mitigate future outbreaks.

APHIS initiated an HPAI study in 2022 and will continue the study as needed to generate up-to-date information for determining current risk factors for infection with this environmentally hardy foreign animal disease pathogen. Current information on risk factors is critical for science-based updates to prevention and control recommendations.

The information collection activity associated with this study consists of a multi-question survey administered to commercial poultry producers.

APHIS requested and was granted emergency approval to use this information collection activity for 6 months. We are asking the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to approve our use of this information collection activity for an additional 3 years in the event the study needs to be extended because of unanticipated outbreaks.

The purpose of this notice is to solicit comments from the public (as well as affected agencies) concerning our information collection. These comments will help us:

(1) Evaluate whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of our estimate of the burden of the collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

(4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, through use, as appropriate, of automated, electronic, mechanical, and other collection technologies; e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.

Estimate of burden: The public burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 0.45 hours per response.

Respondents: State agricultural officials and poultry producers.

Estimated annual number of respondents: 270.

Estimated annual number of responses per respondent: 1.289.

Estimated annual number of responses: 348.

Estimated total annual burden on respondents: 155 hours. (Due to averaging, the total annual burden hours may not equal the product of the annual number of responses multiplied by the reporting burden per response.)

All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will also become a matter of public record.

Title: Sugar Imported for Export as Refined Sugar or as Sugar-Containing Products or used in the Production of Certain Polyhydric Alcohols.

OMB Number: 0551-0015.

Expiration Date of Approval: September 30, 2025.

Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved information collection.

Abstract: As provided in 7 CFR part 1530, the Refined Sugar Re-Export Program, the Sugar-Containing Products Re-Export Program, and the Polyhydric Alcohol Program Sugar Re-Export Program, collectively referred to as the “Sugar Re-Export Program,” permit entry of raw cane sugar, unrestricted by the quantitative limit established by the sugar tariff-rate quota, for re-export in refined form or in sugar containing products or for production of certain polyhydric alcohols. As many as 200 licensees are currently eligible to participate in these programs. In early 2023, the Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS) intends to launch a new data reporting system called Sugar Unified Certification Review, Oversight, Statistics, and Evaluation (SUCROSE) for the Sugar Re-Export Program, which will lead to a slight increase in reporting burden for licensees compared to the current Sugars Users Group Accounting and Reporting System (SUGARS).

Estimate of Burden: The public reporting burden for each respondent resulting from information collection under the Sugar Re-Export Program varies in direct relation to the number and type of agreements entered into by such respondent. The estimated average reporting burden for the Sugar Re-Export Program is 0.50 hours per response. Under 7 CFR part 1530, the information collected is used by the licensing authority to manage, plan, evaluate, and account for program activities. The reports and records are required to ensure the proper operations of these programs.

Respondents: Sugar refiners, manufacturers of sugar containing products, and producers of polyhydric alcohol.

Estimated Number of Respondents: 325.

Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 8.

Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 720 hours.

Copies of this information collection can be obtained from Dacia Rogers, the Agency Information Collection Coordinator, at Dacia.Rogers@usda.gov.

Request for Comments: Send comments regarding (a) whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the collection of information including validity of the methodology and assumption used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology.

All comments received in response to this notice, including names and addresses when provided, will be a matter of public record. Comments will be available without change, including any personal information provided, for inspection online at http://www.regulations.gov and at the mail address listed above between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays.

Comments will be summarized and included in the submission for Office of Management and Budget approval.

Persons with disabilities who require an alternative means for communication of information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact FAS-ReasonableAccommodation@usda.gov or Felice Robinson (Senior Reasonable Accommodations Specialist), Felice.Robinson@usda.gov.

The meeting agenda will include:

The meeting is open to the public. The agenda will include time for people to make oral statements of three minutes or less. Individuals wishing to make an oral statement should make a request in writing at least three days prior to the meeting date to be scheduled on the agenda. Anyone who would like to bring related matters to the attention of the committee may file written statements with the committee staff before or after the meeting. Written comments and requests for time for oral comments must be sent to Matt Zumstein, DFO, Carson Ranger District, 1536 South Carson Street, Carson City, Nevada, 89701; or by email to matthew.zumstein@usda.gov.

USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident.

Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information ( e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA's TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English.

Equal opportunity practices in accordance with USDA's policies will be followed in all appointments to the Committee. To ensure that the recommendations of the Committee have taken in account the needs of the diverse groups served by USDA, membership shall include to the extent possible, individuals with demonstrated ability to represent minorities, women, and person with disabilities. USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender.

Background: Rural Development is an advocate for rural America, administering a multitude of programs, ranging from housing and community facilities to infrastructure and business development. The Agency's mission is to increase economic opportunity and improve the quality of life in rural communities by providing the leadership, infrastructure, capital, and technical support that enables rural communities to prosper. To achieve its mission, the Agency provides financial support, including loan guarantees, direct loans and grants, and technical assistance to enhance the quality of life and provide the foundation for economic development in rural areas.

The RBCS and RUS received significant funding through the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022, Public Law Number 117-169. It is anticipated that this funding will support the long-term resilience, reliability, and affordability of rural electric systems by providing financial assistance to purchase renewable energy, other zero-emission systems, and energy efficiency improvements that will achieve the greatest reduction in greenhouse gas emissions associated with the rural electric system. Additionally, with funding received in the IRA, Rural Development will support renewable energy and energy efficiency projects for farms and small businesses through the Rural Energy for America Program and invest in fueling and distribution infrastructure to increase demand for higher blends of biofuels.

Section 22001 of the IRA provides $1 billion in budget authority for loans for renewable energy infrastructure and requires the agency to forgive up to 50 percent of the loan amount if the loan terms and conditions are complied with. In addition, the Secretary may allow forgiveness above 50 percent so long as additional criteria are met. Eligible entities include electric service providers, including municipals, cooperatives, investor-owned and Tribal utilities. Pursuant to IRA all projects must be for build-out of energy conservation systems fueled by solar, hydro, wind, geothermal and biomass, as required by section 317 of the Rural Electrification Act (7 U.S.C. 940g), or for storage of such energy types. Priority will be given to new construction of renewable infrastructure.

Section 22002 of the IRA provides $2.025 Billion for the Rural Energy for America Program (REAP) which includes a $303.8 million set aside for underutilized technologies and technical assistance. Both amounts will be administered under REAP as a single program, as any monies not used for underutilized technologies will revert to the general REAP fund the following fiscal year. The federal share can increase from 25 percent to 50 percent of total project cost.

Section 22003 of the IRA provides $500 million in grants for infrastructure for blending, storing, supplying, or distributing biofuels. The program may provide a federal share at up to 75% of the total project cost.

Section 22004 of the IRA provides $9.7 billion in budget authority for loans, grants, loan modifications and other financial assistance to support purchase of renewable energy, renewable energy systems, zero-emissions, and carbon capture systems to deploy such systems or to make energy efficiency improvements to generation and transmission systems of eligible entities. Eligible entities include electric cooperatives, current and former RUS electric borrowers, or a cooperative that is serving a predominantly rural area (or a wholly or jointly owned subsidiary of such electric cooperative). Pursuant to the statute, no eligible entity may receive an amount equal to or more than 10% ($970 million in budget authority) of the total amount made available by the subsection (cumulative across all three products). RUS may consider establishing lower funding limits under a Funding Opportunity Announcement.

Rural Development is beginning the development of the funding tools that will be used to deliver this important funding and stakeholder feedback is vital in developing financial assistance products that will be integral to ensuring this funding reaches the intended customers. Rural Development will hold the listening sessions as outlined in the ADDRESSES section of this notice to receive oral comments from stakeholders and the public. The following questions and discussion items are provided as examples of topics stakeholders may wish to provide comment on. Rural Development welcomes pertinent comments that are beyond the scope of these questions. Rural Development is requesting comment and discussion on the following topics:

Question 1: IRA requires that funds be fully disbursed by 9/30/2031, meaning construction and processing of all reimbursements must occur before then. Do you have a project(s) that could meet the statutory requirements of any of the RD IRA sections that could be completed within this time frame? When would be the soonest you would anticipate filing? When would financing need to be approved so project(s) could be completed within this time frame?

Question 2: How do you recommend RUS/RBCS balance the interests of large and small applicants? What measures should be taken and stakeholders or partners should be engaged to ensure active participation in RD IRA funding in socially disadvantaged and distressed communities, particularly with projects that will have an Environmental Justice impact?

Question 3: Projects funded under IRA are intended to increase energy efficiency (decrease consumption of energy) and increase the deployment and use of renewable energy and/or clean energy. Knowing this requirement, what metric is most appropriate to measure progress toward meeting the goal of achieving greenhouse gas reductions and the expansion of renewable/clean energy infrastructure?

Question 4: In particular, for Section 22004, what is the most effective way to measure comparative reductions in carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide emissions?

Question 5: Section 22001 of the IRA authorizes a new financing mechanism for the RUS Electric Program by providing partial loan forgiveness. The maximum amount allowed to be forgiven is 50 percent. Under the statute, the Secretary may authorize forgiveness above 50 percent.

• Should loan forgiveness be a standard amount for all applicants or tiered based on certain criteria?

• What circumstances should justify the Secretary exceeding the 50% limitation under Sec. 22001?

Question 6: As consumer owned entities, how can cooperatives ensure that savings resulting from this program contribute to Section 22004's statutory purpose of “affordability?”

Question 7: Section 22002 provides additional funding for REAP. A key difference under IRA is the ability for the Agency to provide up to 50 percent of the cost of an activity carried out using grant funds. How should the Agency determine the level of grant for individual applications? Should there be a standard grant amount or a tiered approach? What criteria should drive a tiered approach?

Question 8: Section 22002 provides additional funding for underutilized technology projects and technical assistance for the purposes of applying to the program. What strategies should RD use to engage and encourage applications under this section?

Rural Development will hold the listening session on the dates listed in DATES section of this notice. Oral comments received from this listening session will be documented. All attendees of the listening sessions who submit oral comments may also are submit a written copy to help Rural Development accurately capture public input. In addition, stakeholders and the public who do not wish to attend or speak during the listing session are invited to submit written comments which must be received by the date indicated in the DATES section of this notice.

At the listening session, the focus is for Rural Development to hear from the public; this is not a discussion with Rural Development officials or a question-and-answer session. As noted above, the purpose is to receive public input that Rural Development can factor into decisions it needs to make in order to implement the IRA.

Each listening session will begin with brief opening remarks from USDA leadership in Rural Development. Individual speakers providing oral comments are requested to be succinct (the agency reserves the right to announce a time limitation at the beginning of each session based on attendance) as we do not know at this time how many participants there will be. As noted above, speakers providing oral comments may also provide a written copy of their comments. (See the ADDRESSES section above for information about submitting written comments.)

Rural Development will be using the Zoom platform to host the virtual listening session.

The meeting is available to the public through the web link above. If joining only via phone, callers can expect to incur charges for calls they initiate over wireless lines, and the Commission will not refund any incurred charges. Individuals who are deaf, deafblind and hard of hearing may also follow the proceedings by first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339 and providing the Service with conference details found through registering at the web link above. To request additional accommodations, please email mwojnaroski@usccr.gov at least 10 days prior to the meeting.

Members of the public are invited to make statements during the open comment period of the meeting or submit written comments. The comments must be received in the regional office approximately 30 days after each scheduled meeting. Written comments may be emailed to Melissa Wojnaroski at mwojnaroski@usccr.gov. Persons who desire additional information may contact Melissa Wojnaroski at mwojnaroski@usccr.gov.

Records and documents discussed during the meeting will be available for public viewing as they become available at www.facadatabase.gov. Persons interested in the work of this advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's website, www.usccr.gov, or to contact Evelyn Bohor at ebohor@usccr.gov.

The subject permit is requested under the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended (MMPA; 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq. ), and the regulations governing the taking and importing of marine mammals (50 CFR part 216).

The applicant proposes to film humpback whales and Hawaiian spinner dolphins in the waters off the coasts of Maui and Hawaii-Kona for a natural history documentary on the variety and diversity of the Hawaiian ecosystems. The applicant would film and observe up to 400 humpback whales and 1200 spinner dolphins annually topside from a vessel, using an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) or underwater by diving. Up to 250 short-finned pilot whales ( Globicephala macrorhynchus ) and 400 bottlenose dolphins ( Tursiops truncatus ) annually may be harassed and opportunistically filmed if in the vicinity of the target species. The permit would be valid from February 2023 through December 2024.

It has come to the agency's attention that the 2016 interim final humpback approach rule (50 CFR 216.19; 81 FR 62010, September 8, 2016) does not explicitly exempt permits issued under section 104(c)(6) of the MMPA from its prohibitions. It is not the agency's intent to preclude the issuance of permits or authorizations consistent with the requirements of the MMPA. We interpret the rule to allow issuance of these permits. Consistent with this interpretation, it has been our practice to continue to issue section 104(c)(6) permits that are in compliance with the MMPA's requirements and our review procedures. However, to eliminate any potential ambiguity, we intend to revise the rule to explicitly clarify that photography permits issued under section 104(c)(6) of the MMPA are exempt from the prohibitions on approach.

In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq. ), an initial determination has been made that the activity proposed is categorically excluded from the requirement to prepare an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement.

Concurrent with the publication of this notice in the Federal Register , NMFS is forwarding copies of the application to the Marine Mammal Commission and its Committee of Scientific Advisors.

The Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI) and Gulf of Alaska (GOA) Groundfish Plan Teams will compile and review the annual BSAI and GOA Groundfish Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation (SAFE) reports, and recommend final groundfish Over Fishing Limit (OFL) and Allowable Biological Catches (ABCs) for 2023/24. The Plan Teams will also review the Economic Report and the Ecosystem Status Reports. The agenda is subject to change, and the latest version will be posted at https://meetings.npfmc.org/Meeting/Details/2961 prior to the meeting, along with meeting materials.

You can attend the meeting online using a computer, tablet, or smartphone; or by phone only. Connection information will be posted online at: https://meetings.npfmc.org/Meeting/Details/2961.

Public comment letters should be submitted electronically via the electronic agenda at https://meetings.npfmc.org/Meeting/Details/2961.

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

The following items are on the agenda, though agenda items may be addressed out of order (changes will be noted on the Council's website when possible.)

Meeting will begin with Adoption of Agenda, Approval of Minutes from March 29, 2022, meeting, and Scope of Work. The AP will review Council Actions in Response to Motions from the March 2022 Shrimp AP Meeting, and June 2022 Council Meeting Motions. The AP will receive updates on the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Expansion Proposal, Status of 2020 Gulf of Mexico Shrimp Effort and Landings Estimates, Draft Wind Energy Areas in the Gulf of Mexico and update on Research Track (SEDAR).

The AP will review the Recent Information on Sawfish in the Gulf; and receive any public testimony and discuss other business items.

The in-person meeting will be broadcast via webinar. You may register by visiting www.gulfcouncil.org and clicking on the Shrimp Advisory Panel meeting on the calendar.

The Agenda is subject to change, and the latest version along with other meeting materials will be posted on www.gulfcouncil.org as they become available.

Although other non-emergency issues not on the agenda may come before the Advisory Panel for discussion, in accordance with the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), those issues may not be the subject of formal action during this meeting. Actions will be restricted to those issues specifically identified in this notice and any issues arising after publication of this notice that require emergency action under Section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, provided the public has been notified of the Council's intent to take-action to address the emergency at least 5 working days prior to the meeting.

The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid or accommodations should be directed to Kathy Pereira, kathy.pereira@gulfcouncil.org, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

In September 2022, NOAA Fisheries disapproved an Amendment to the MSB fishery management plan that would have reduced excess capacity in the Illex fishery. This meeting will consider potential follow-up actions by the Council.

The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should be directed to Shelley Spedden, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

Background

On September 29, 2022, we published a Notice of Receipt (NOR) regarding an adequate and complete application received by Atlantic Shores, who has requested NMFS to authorize the taking of marine mammals incidental to the construction of two offshore wind energy projects located off of New Jersey in and around lease area OCS-A-0499 (87 FR 59061). The NOR allowed for a 30-day public comment period, which is scheduled to close on October 31, 2022. On October 3, 2022, we received a request from the Save Long Beach Island, Inc. Coalition for Wind Without Impact (Save LBI) for a 15-day extension of the public comment period. The request indicated that Save LBI needed more time to conduct their review of the available documents and provide comments. Given that the targeted publication date of the proposed rule is May 1, 2023 (per Title 41 of the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (FAST-41); https://www.permits.performance.gov/permitting-project/atlantic-shores-south ) and the requested extension would not interfere with any of the intermediate milestones, NMFS has elected to provide additional time (15 additional days) for public comment.

NMFS is extending the public comment period from an original end date of October 31, 2022, (87 FR 59061) to November 15, 2022, per this notice. No information has changed and all information that was previously described in the Background section, the Summary of Request section, and the Specified Activities section of the prior notice (87 FR 59061, September 29, 2022) remain applicable to this notice and the activities proposed by Atlantic Shores. Furthermore, all information remains available to the public on NMFS' website ( https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/incidental-take-authorization-atlantic-shores-offshore-wind-llc-construction-atlantic-shores ). All comments and information submitted previously regarding Atlantic Shores' projects will be fully considered in preparation of the proposed rule and do not need to be resubmitted.

This notice is published pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 8503 (a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed actions.

If the Committee approves the proposed additions, the entities of the Federal Government identified in this notice will be required to procure the service(s) listed below from nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.

The following service(s) are proposed for addition to the Procurement List for delivery by the nonprofit agencies listed:

On August 17, 2022, CPSC published a notice in the Federal Register announcing the agency's intent to seek an extension for this information collection. 87 FR 50612. CPSC received no comments in response to that notice. Accordingly, CPSC seeks to renew the following currently approved collection of information:

Title: Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act Verification of Compliance Form.

OMB Number: 3041-0142.

Type of Review: Renewal of collection.

Frequency of Response: On occasion.

Affected Public: Public pools and spa facilities.

Estimated Number of Respondents: 50 pools or facilities.

Estimated Time per Response: CPSC staff or the designated State or local government official will take an estimated 3 hours to inspect a pool or spa facility.

Total Estimated Annual Burden: The total testing burden hours are 150 (50 inspections × 3 hours per inspection). We estimate there will be 50 inspections conducted throughout the fiscal year based on CPSC plans for inspections, past compliance rates and trends, as well as available staff resources. We estimate that hourly compensation for the time required for inspecting is $64.02 (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Employer Costs for Employee Compensation,” March 2022, Table 4, total compensation for management, professional, and related workers in private service-producing industries: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.t04.htm ). The total annual cost of time to inspect all facilities is estimated to be $9,603 ($64.02 × 150).

The Virginia Graeme Baker Pool and Spa Safety Act (Act), 15 U.S.C. 8001-8008, applies to public swimming pools and spas, and it requires that each swimming pool and spa drain cover manufactured, distributed, or entered into commerce in the United States shall conform to the entrapment protection standards of the ASME/ANSI A112.19.8 performance standard or any successor standard regulating such swimming pool or drain cover under section 1404(b) of the Act.

On August 5, 2011, the CPSC published a final rule incorporating by reference ANSI/APSP-16 2011 as the successor standard, effective September 6, 2011. 76 FR 47436. On May 24, 2019, the CPSC published a direct final rule incorporating by reference ANSI/APSP-16 2017 as the next successor standard. 84 FR 24021. The Act requires that, in addition to having the anti-entrapment devices or systems, each public pool and spa in the United States with a single main drain other than an unblockable drain shall be equipped with one or more of the following devices or systems designed to prevent entrapment by pool or spa drains: a safety vacuum release system, suction-limiting vent system, gravity drainage system, automatic pump shut-off system or drain disablement. The CPSC will collect information through the verification of compliance form to identify drain covers, pools, and spas that do not meet the performance requirements in ANSI/APSP-16 2017 and the Act. CPSC staff or the designated State or local government official will take approximately 3 hours to inspect the pool and fill out the checklist on the verification of compliance form. The 2022 VGBA Form they will use is available for viewing at https://www.regulations.gov under docket number, CPSC-2009-0073, “Supporting and Related Material.”

Section 4314(c)(1) of Title 5 of the United States Code requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or more SES Performance Review Boards (PRB). (Section 4314(c)(4) requires that notice of appointment of PRB members be published in the Federal Register . The PRB is responsible for making recommendations to the appointing and awarding authority on the performance appraisal ratings and performance awards for SES employees. Members of the PRB will serve a term that shall begin on November 1, 2022. The following executives have been designated as members of the Performance Review Board for CSOSA and PSA:

A final rule published in the Federal Register (FR) on February 15, 2019 (84 FR 4326-4333) established the requirement for the Director, Defense Health Agency (DHA), to provide public notice to TRICARE program beneficiaries with a summary of changes to the TRICARE program each calendar year in connection with the annual open season enrollment period.

Open Season is an annual period when beneficiaries can enroll in or make changes to their healthcare, dental and vision coverage for the next calendar year.

The TRICARE Open Season runs from November 14, 2022, through December 13, 2022, during which time beneficiaries can enroll in or change their TRICARE Prime or TRICARE Select plan.

The Federal Employee Dental and Vision Insurance Program (FEDVIP) Open Season runs from November 14, 2022, through December 12, 2022. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management offers FEDVIP enrollment to qualified beneficiaries of the Military Health System, including TRICARE for Life beneficiaries. During the FEDVIP Open Season beneficiaries may enroll in or make changes to their dental and vision plans.

Any changes beneficiaries make during open season will take effect on January 1, 2023. If a beneficiary remains eligible and does not make any changes during Open Season, then their coverage will stay the same for 2023.

The following TRICARE program features are subject to a year-to-year determination and are announced each year prior to the annual TRICARE Open Season.

Urgent Care Visits: Except for most Active Duty Service members, there continues to be no limit to the number of urgent care visits a TRICARE Prime enrollee may receive without a referral for Plan Year 2023. They may receive urgent care from any TRICARE-authorized urgent care center (UCC), either network or non-network. They may also receive urgent care from any TRICARE network provider. If the TRICARE Prime enrollee seeks care from a non-network TRICARE authorized provider (outside of a TRICARE-authorized UCC), the usual TRICARE Prime Point of Service deductible and cost-shares shall apply. Beneficiaries may also call the Military Health System Nurse Advice Line (NAL) for health care guidance from a specially trained registered nurse. The NAL is available 24/7 to all TRICARE beneficiaries in the United States (U.S.) except those enrolled in the US Family Health Plan. Beneficiaries who live overseas can call the NAL for health care advice when traveling in the U.S., but must coordinate care with their Overseas Regional Call Center. For additional information, call the servicing TRICARE contractor or visit https://www.tricare.mil/ContactUs/CallUs/NAL.

Prime Service Area Changes: Prime Service Areas (PSAs) are geographic areas around military Medical Treatment Facilities and Base Realignment and Closure sites. PSAs ensure medical readiness of active duty members by adding to the capability and capacity of military hospitals and clinics. There is no change to geographic locations where TRICARE Prime will be offered.

Coronavirus Disease 2023 (COVID-19) Continued Response: A temporary waiver to the referral requirement remains in effect for TRICARE Prime enrollees, not including Active Duty Service Members (ADSMs), so they may receive COVID-19 vaccines, a clinical preventive service, from any TRICARE Basic (medical) program authorized non-network provider without incurring POS charges where applicable. This waiver will expire when the President of the United States declares the national emergency is terminated. As part of the COVID-19 response, the following temporary changes for care and treatment continue to be in effect: temporary coverage of the treatment use of investigational drugs under expanded access when for the treatment of COVID-19; temporary coverage of National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) sponsored clinical trials when for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 or its associated sequalae; temporary interstate and international licensing, which allows the temporary waiver of licensing requirements for providers practicing (both in person and via telehealth) in a state or host-nation in which they are not licensed, when licensed in another state or nation and such practice is permitted by state, federal, or host-nation law; and temporary coverage of temporary facilities registered with Medicare's Hospitals Without Walls initiative. These temporary changes remain in effect until the President of the United States issues a declaration that the Public Health Emergency has terminated, unless terminated, extended, or otherwise modified in a final rule published in the Federal Register .

The following changes or improvements to the TRICARE program benefits apply to calendar year 2023 (although, some changes were implemented in 2022):

Telephonic Office Visit: Introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic, the telephonic office visit (audio-only telehealth) benefit was made permanent for all TRICARE enrollees effective July 1, 2022. A telephonic office visit is a TRICARE-covered service provided via a telephone call between an established TRICARE patient and his or her TRICARE-authorized provider. TRICARE can cover telephonic office visits for otherwise covered medically necessary and appropriate care that does not require face-to-face, hands-on treatment or visual evaluation. However, not all TRICARE covered services are appropriate for telephonic office visits. For example, evaluation of a skin lesion would require visual evaluation that cannot be completed via a telephone-only visit. Similarly, the services rendered through an intensive outpatient program would likewise be inappropriate to administer via telephone only. Another example, removal of a cast, would require hands-on treatment and would not be suitable for a telephonic visit.

Female Contraception and Sterilization: Active Duty service Members and TRICARE health plan enrollees enjoy access to a comprehensive range of contraceptive care under the TRICARE Program. Effective July 28, 2022, DHA eliminated cost-shares and copayments for reversible medical contraceptives as preventive services under TRICARE Prime and TRICARE Select. Reversible medical contraceptives include the FDA-approved implant, shot, and intrauterine devices. Beneficiaries can request refunds from their servicing TRICARE contractor on or after October 17, 2022, for any cost-share or copayment paid for these services performed on or after the effective date of July 28, 2022. DHA cannot eliminate cost-shares and/or copayments for daily use prescription birth control pills because TRICARE Pharmacy Program cost-sharing is mandated by law.

However, effective January 1, 2023, TRICARE Prime and Select beneficiaries seeking female surgical sterilization services ( i.e., surgical procedure where the fallopian tubes are cut, tied, or blocked to permanently prevent pregnancy) will also enjoy cost-share and copayment free access to these preventive services when performed by a TRICARE network provider.

The Comprehensive Autism Care Demonstration (ACD) for Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) services for TRICARE beneficiaries diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) has been extended through December 31, 2028. The ACD renders clinically necessary and appropriate ABA services for the core symptoms of ASD.

Effective January 1, 2023, the annual premium increase for Continued Health Care Benefit Program (CHCBP) will transition from a Fiscal Year basis (October 1 each year) to a Calendar Year basis (January 1 each year). This change aligns CHCBP with the premium-based TRICARE health plans for uniformity in premium collections and reduces complexity for beneficiaries.

For more information, visit tricare.mil/changes or call the servicing TRICARE contractor.

Certain TRICARE enrollee out-of-pocket costs (enrollment fees, premiums, catastrophic caps, deductibles, and copayments) are adjusted annually by Federal law and regulations based on the annual Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) applied to Uniformed Service member retired pay. A difference in copayments remains between those who joined a Uniformed Service before January 1, 2018 (Group A), and those who joined on or after that date (Group B).

The retiree COLA was announced October 2022. The COLA increase was 8.7 percent. Beneficiary out-of-pocket expenses impacted by the 2023 COLA will be posted to the tricare.mil/changes web page before TRICARE Open Season starts November 14, 2022.

This meeting is being held under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (Title 5 United States Code (U.S.C), Appendix), the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), and 41 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 102-3.140 and 102-3.150.

Purpose of the Meeting: The mission of the DSB is to provide independent advice and recommendations on matters relating to the DoD's scientific and technical enterprise. The objective of the meeting is to obtain, review, and evaluate classified information related to the DSB's mission. DSB membership will meet to discuss the 2022 DSB Summer Study on Technology Superiority (“the DSB Summer Study”).

Agenda: The DSB Summer Study meeting will begin on Monday, November 14, 2022 from 8:30 a.m. with administrative opening remarks from Mr. Kevin Doxey, the Executive Director and DFO, and a classified overview of the objectives of the Summer Study from Dr. Eric Evans, the DSB Chair. Next, the DSB members will meet in a plenary session to discuss classified concepts, capabilities, and strategies that may enhance the military technological advantage of the United States. Following break, the DSB members will meet in small groups to discuss classified concepts, capabilities, and strategies that may enhance the military technological advantage of the United States. The meeting will adjourn at 5:00 p.m. On Tuesday, November 15, 2022, beginning at 8:30 a.m., the DSB members will meet in small groups to discuss classified concepts, capabilities, and strategies that may enhance the military technological advantage of the United States. Following break, the DSB members will meet in small groups to discuss classified concepts, capabilities, and strategies that may enhance the military technological advantage of the United States. The meeting will adjourn at 5:00 p.m. On Wednesday, November 16, 2022, beginning at 8:30 a.m., the DSB members will meet in a plenary session to discuss classified concepts, capabilities, and strategies that may enhance the military technological advantage of the United States. Following break, the DSB members will meet in small groups to discuss classified concepts, capabilities, and strategies that may enhance the military technological advantage of the United States. The meeting will adjourn at 5:00 p.m. On Thursday, November 17, 2022 beginning at 8:30 a.m., the DSB members will meet in small groups to discuss classified concepts, capabilities, and strategies that may enhance the military technological advantage of the United States. Following break, the DSB members will meet in small groups to discuss classified concepts, capabilities, and strategies that may enhance the military technological advantage of the United States. The meeting will adjourn at 5:00 p.m. On Friday, November 18, 2022 beginning at 9:00 a.m., the DSB members will meet in a plenary session to discuss classified concepts, capabilities, and strategies that may enhance the military technological advantage of the United States. DSB will vote on the 2022 Summer Study on Technology Superiority findings and recommendations. The meeting will adjourn at 12:00 p.m.

Meeting Accessibility: In accordance with section 10(d) of the FACA and 41 CFR 102-3.155, the DoD has determined that the DSB meeting will be closed to the public. Specifically, the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, in consultation with the DoD Office of the General Counsel, has determined in writing that the meeting will be closed to the public because it will consider matters covered by 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1). The determination is based on the consideration that it is expected that discussions throughout will involve classified matters of national security concern. Such classified material is so intertwined with the unclassified material that it cannot reasonably be segregated into separate discussions without defeating the effectiveness and meaning of the overall meetings. To permit the meeting to be open to the public would preclude discussion of such matters and would greatly diminish the ultimate utility of the DSB's findings and recommendations to the Secretary of Defense and to the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering.

Written Statements: In accordance with section 10(a)(3) of the FACA and 41 CFR 102-3.105(j) and 102-3.140, interested persons may submit a written statement for consideration by the DSB at any time regarding its mission or in response to the stated agenda of a planned meeting. Individuals submitting a written statement must submit their statement to the DSB DFO at the email provided in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this notice at any point; however, if a written statement is not received at least three calendar days prior to the meeting, which is the subject of this notice, then it may not be provided to or considered by the DSB until a later date.

The Department, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), provides the general public and Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed, revised, and continuing collections of information. This helps the Department assess the impact of its information collection requirements and minimize the public's reporting burden. It also helps the public understand the Department's information collection requirements and provide the requested data in the desired format. ED is soliciting comments on the proposed ICR that is described below. The Department is especially interested in public comments addressing the following issues: (1) is this collection necessary to the proper functions of the Department; (2) will this information be processed and used in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate of burden accurate; (4) how might the Department enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (5) how might the Department minimize the burden of this collection on the respondents, including through the use of information technology. Please note that written comments received in response to this notice will be considered public record.

Title of Collection: GEPA Section 427 Guidance for All Grant Applications.

OMB Control Number: 1894-0005.

Type of Review: A revision of a currently approved collection.

Respondents/Affected Public: State, Local, and Tribal Governments.

Total Estimated Number of Annual Responses: 12,816.

Total Estimated Number of Annual Burden Hours: 38,448.

Abstract: On October 20, 1994, the Improving America's Schools Act, Public Law 103-382 (The Act), became law. The Act added a provision to the General Education Provisions Act (GEPA), section 427. Section 427 of GEPA requires an applicant for assistance under Department programs to develop and describe in the grant application the steps it proposes to take to ensure equitable access to, and equitable participation in, its proposed project for students, teachers, and other program beneficiaries. Applicants have responded to the GEPA 427 requirements for approximately the last 27 years, and the current form expires in June 2023. In response to the Agency's Equity Plan resulting from the President's Executive Order 13985, we now propose to update that form by expanding the number of questions from one to four.

These four questions are intended to help applicants for Department grant funds to be more intentional and specific as to identifying barriers to equitable access and how they will address those barriers consistent with the requirements of section 427 of GEPA. As with the existing form, applicants retain the flexibility to determine and define for themselves the barriers to “equitable access” and “equitable participation” based on the design of their proposed grant projects and the participants and community the project proposes to serve.

The Department, in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), provides the general public and Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed, revised, and continuing collections of information. This helps the Department assess the impact of its information collection requirements and minimize the public's reporting burden. It also helps the public understand the Department's information collection requirements and provide the requested data in the desired format. ED is soliciting comments on the proposed ICR that is described below. The Department is especially interested in public comments addressing the following issues: (1) is this collection necessary to the proper functions of the Department; (2) will this information be processed and used in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate of burden accurate; (4) how might the Department enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (5) how might the Department minimize the burden of this collection on the respondents, including through the use of information technology. Please note that written comments received in response to this notice will be considered public record.

Title of Collection: 2024 Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS 2024) International Field Test Questionnaire Revision.

OMB Control Number: 1850-0888.

Type of Review: A revision of a currently approved collection.

Respondents/Affected Public: Individuals and households.

Total Estimated Number of Annual Responses: 2,683.

Total Estimated Number of Annual Burden Hours: 3,133.

Abstract: The Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) is an international survey of teachers and principals focusing on the working conditions of teachers and the teaching and learning practices in schools. The United States will administer TALIS for the third time in 2024, having participated in 2013 and 2018. TALIS 2024 is sponsored by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). TALIS is steered by the TALIS Governing Board (TGB), comprising representatives from the OECD member countries, and implemented internationally by organizations contracted by the OECD (referred to as the “international consortium” or “IC”). In the U.S., TALIS 2024 is conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) of the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

TALIS 2024 is focused on teachers' professional environment, teaching conditions, and their impact on school and teacher effectiveness. TALIS 2024 will address teacher training and professional development, teacher appraisal, school climate, school leadership, instructional approaches, pedagogical practices, and teaching experience with and support for teaching diverse populations.

OECD has scheduled the main study to occur in the Northern hemisphere from February through March 2024 and in the Southern hemisphere from June through August 2024. To prepare for the main study, several TALIS countries will conduct pilot studies in February 2022; the U.S. will not participate. Countries will also conduct a field test in the first quarter of 2023, primarily to evaluate newly developed questionnaire items and school recruitment materials; the U.S. will participate in the field test. To meet the international data collection schedule for the field test, U.S. recruitment activities need to begin by August 2022 and U.S. questionnaires must be finalized by December 2022.

TALIS 2024 includes the core TALIS teacher and principal surveys that are required for each participating country, as well as an optional Teacher Knowledge Survey (TKS). The TKS is intended to better understand the teacher pedagogical knowledge base at the national level. The US is including the TKS in the upcoming TALIS 2024 field test and will evaluate these results to determine the feasibility of including TKS as part of the US Main Study.

The previous submission (OMB #1850-0888 v.8) requested approval for: (1) recruitment and pre-survey activities for the 2023 field test sample; (2) administration of the field test; and (3) school recruitment and pre-survey activities for the 2024 main study sample. That package was approved in August 2022. This submission requests approval for the final international versions of the principal and teacher instruments approved for the TALIS 2024 Field Test. The final U.S. adaptations of the 2024 core TALIS and TKS field test questionnaires that will be administered in the TALIS 2024 U.S. Field Test will be submitted to OMB as a non-substantive change request in Winter 2022/23.

The Department of Education (ED), in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), provides the general public and Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed, revised, and continuing collections of information. This helps the Department assess the impact of its information collection requirements and minimize the public's reporting burden. It also helps the public understand the Department's information collection requirements and provide the requested data in the desired format. ED is soliciting comments on the proposed information collection request (ICR) that is described below. The Department of Education is especially interested in public comment addressing the following issues: (1) is this collection necessary to the proper functions of the Department; (2) will this information be processed and used in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate of burden accurate; (4) how might the Department enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (5) how might the Department minimize the burden of this collection on the respondents, including through the use of information technology. Please note that written comments received in response to this notice will be considered public records.

Title of Collection: National Evaluation of Title III Implementation.

OMB Control Number: 1850-NEW.

Type of Review: A new information collection.

Respondents/Affected Public: State, Local, and Tribal Governments.

Total Estimated Number of Annual Responses: 3,301.

Total Estimated Number of Annual Burden Hours: 574.

Abstract: The data collection described in this submission includes state-, district-, and school-level surveys for the National Evaluation of Title III Implementation. This study is designed to provide information to policymakers, administrators, and educators about state and local practices for serving English learners (ELs), both through implementation of Title III, Part A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) and more generally. The surveys will collect information on criteria for identifying and reclassifying ELs, instructional models and strategies for ELs, strategies for promoting EL teacher quality, and supports for EL parents and families.

In accordance with regulations at 40 CFR part 53, the EPA evaluates various methods for monitoring the concentrations of those ambient air pollutants for which EPA has established National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) as set forth in 40 CFR part 50. Monitoring methods that are determined to meet specific requirements for adequacy are designated by the EPA as either reference or equivalent methods (as applicable), thereby permitting their use under 40 CFR part 58 by States and other agencies for determining compliance with the NAAQS. A list of all reference or equivalent methods that have been previously designated by EPA may be found at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/criteria.html.

The EPA hereby announces the designation of one new equivalent method for measuring concentrations of Particulate Matter in the 2.5-micron range (PM 2.5 ) in ambient air. This designation is made under the provisions of 40 CFR part 53, as amended on October 26, 2015 (80 FR 65291-65468).

The new equivalent method for PM 2.5 is an automated method (analyzer) utilizing an optically based measurement principle. This newly designated equivalent method is identified as follows:

EQPM-0922-260 “Ambilabs Model 2WIN PM 2.5 FEM Monitor” Optically based continuous ambient particulate analyzer operated at a volumetric flow rate of 2 Lpm, equipped with Ambilabs omnidirectional sampling inlet (P/N: M9003011), an Ambilabs 2 Lpm sharp cut cyclone inlet (P/N: A001025), and an Ambilabs ambient temperature sensor (P/N: AL-2WIN-TEMP) configured for operation with firmware version 1.36 or later, and operated in accordance with the Ambilabs 2WIN operations manual. The 2WIN PM 2.5 FEM Monitor is set for red and blue scattering coefficients and the internal sample conditioning must be set for an RH < 35%. The Monitor can be operated either outside in an Ambilabs environmental enclosure (P/N: Neph Shelter) or as tabletop or wall mount in an AC controlled shelter. This designation applies to PM 2.5 measurements only.

This application for an equivalent method determination for this PM 2.5 method was received by the Office of Research and Development on July 12, 2022. This analyzer is commercially available from the applicant, Ambilabs, 100 Elm Street, Warren, RI 02885.

A representative test analyzer was tested in accordance with the applicable test procedures specified in 40 CFR part 53, as amended on October 26, 2015. After reviewing the results of those tests and other information submitted by the applicant, EPA has determined, in accordance with part 53, that this method should be designated as an equivalent method.

As a designated equivalent method, this method is acceptable for use by states and other air monitoring agencies under the requirements of 40 CFR part 58, Ambient Air Quality Surveillance. For such purposes, this method must be used in strict accordance with the operation or instruction manual associated with the method and subject to any specifications and limitations ( e.g., configuration or operational settings) specified in the designated method description (see the identification of the method above).

Use of the method also should be in general accordance with the guidance and recommendations of applicable sections of the “Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume I,” EPA/600/R-94/038a and “Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume II, Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Program,” EPA-454/B-13-003, (both available at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/qalist.html ). Provisions concerning modification of such methods by users are specified under Section 2.8 (Modifications of Methods by Users) of Appendix C to 40 CFR part 58.

Consistent or repeated noncompliance with any of these conditions should be reported to: Director, Air Methods and Characterization Division (MD-D205-03), Center for Environmental Measurements and Modeling, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711.

Designation of this equivalent method is intended to assist the States in establishing and operating their air quality surveillance systems under 40 CFR part 58. Questions concerning the commercial availability or technical aspects of the method should be directed to the applicant.

As part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork burdens, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), the FCC invited the general public and other Federal Agencies to take this opportunity to comment on the following information collection. Comments are requested concerning: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Commission, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's burden estimates; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4), the FCC seeks specific comment on how it might “further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.”

OMB Control Number: 3060-XXXX.

Title: Performance Evaluation of Numbering Administration Vendor(s).

Form Number: N/A.

Type of Review: New information collection.

Respondents: Business or other for-profit entities, Not-for-profit entities, and State, Local and Tribal Governments.

Number of Respondents and Responses: 6,161 respondents and 6,161 responses.

Estimated Time per Response: 0.25 hours.

Frequency of Response: Annual reporting requirement.

Obligation to Respond: Voluntary.

Total Annual Burden: 1,540 hours.

Total Annual Cost: No cost.

Privacy Impact Assessment: Personally identifiable information (PII) in the form of business contact information will be collected and maintained in accordance with the FCC-2, Business Contacts and Certifications, System of Records Notice (SORN), posted at https://www.fcc.gov/managing-director/privacy-transparency/privacy-act-information. There is no intention by the Numbering Administration Oversight Working Group (NAOWG), North American Numbering Council (NANC), or the Commission to make this business contact information publicly available.

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: Participants must share their business contact information to respond to the survey. This information will be protected as described in the FCC-2, Business Contacts and Certifications SORN, posted at https://www.fcc.gov/managing-director/privacy-transparency/privacy-act-information. Participation in each survey is voluntary and any participant can decline to participate at any time.

Needs and Uses: The Commission is requesting Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval for this new information collection. This collection of information is an annual performance satisfaction survey of its vendor(s) acting as administrators for various telephone number management functions.

These functions may be performed by one or multiple vendors under one or multiple contracts. The vendor(s) act pursuant to their contract(s) with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the FCC's numbering rules. See 47 CFR 52.1 et seq.

The survey will be designed and administered by the Numbering Administration Oversight Working Group (NAOWG) of the North American Numbering Council (NANC). The NANC is a Federal Advisory Committee established under the Federal Advisory Committee Act. The NANC advises the FCC and makes recommendations, reached through consensus, that foster efficient and impartial number administration. The NANC is composed of representatives of telecommunications carriers, regulators, cable providers, Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP) providers, industry associations, vendors, and consumer advocates. Working groups, including the NAOWG, made up of industry experts, have been established by the NANC to assist in its efforts. The NANC charter can be found at https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-375774A1.pdf.

The relevant contract(s) require that the Commission and/or its designee shall develop and conduct a performance survey for each administrator. The results of this consumer satisfaction survey will provide the FCC with indicators on how well the vendor(s) are acting as the North American Numbering Program Administrator (NANPA), Pooling Administrator (PA), Routing Number Administrator (RNA) and Reassigned Numbering Database Administrator (RNDA) is meeting its contractual obligations and accomplishing its mission as the NANPA/PA/RNA/RNDA.

AHRQ's Improve Non-surgical Treatment of Urinary Incontinence Among Women in Primary Care (INTUIT-PC) initiative, now named the Managing Urinary Incontinence (MUI) initiative, addresses important gaps in urinary incontinence (UI) care for women in the primary care setting. As part of the MUI initiative, AHRQ is funding five cooperative agreement (U18) grantees to develop primary care extension services to disseminate and implement improved nonsurgical treatment of UI for women—including screening, diagnosis, management, and specialty referral—within primary care practices in separate regions of the United States.

AHRQ is also conducting a project to support the MUI cooperative agreements and evaluate the initiative, which includes:

• Support of the five U18 MUI cooperative agreements in the form of a learning community, technical assistance, and other resources to assist grantees to disseminate and implement patient centered outcomes research (PCOR) for nonsurgical treatment of urinary incontinence for women in primary care.

• A rigorous mixed methods process and outcome evaluation of the grantees' dissemination and implementation strategies.

This evaluation is being conducted by AHRQ through its contractor, RAND, pursuant to AHRQ's authority to carry out the PCOR dissemination activities described in section 937 of the Public Health Service Act. 42 U.S.C. 299b—37.

To achieve the goals of this multisite evaluation, AHRQ is requesting OMB approval for three years of data collection by the evaluator. The evaluator's primary data collection is requested to achieve the goals of the multisite evaluation and includes the following data collection activities:

(1) Focus groups with practice facilitators who are employed by the MUI U18 grantees to provide direct technical assistance to primary care practices

(2) Semi-structured interviews with leaders and staff of primary care practices participating in the MUI U18 studies

Practice facilitator focus groups. Practice facilitators (also known as practice coaches) perform a critical role in enabling primary care practices to implement evidence-based improvements. The purpose of the annual focus groups with practice facilitators is to gather their insights on challenges assisting various types of primary care practices, the resources needed to promote improvement in primary care practices, and the effectiveness of different dissemination and implementation strategies used by the MUI U18 studies. The evaluator aims to conduct a virtual focus group with 8-10 practice facilitators for each of the five U18 studies, for an expected total of 45 focus group participants per year.

Practice leader/staff semi-structured interviews. The goal of the MUI U18 studies is to disseminate and implement evidence-based UI treatment for women within primary care practices. The purpose of the semi-structured interviews with leaders and staff of primary care practices is to collect data from the practices' perspective on the barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based UI treatment for women in primary care, as well as on the utility of the technical assistance and resources provided to practices by the grant studies. The evaluator aims to conduct 4-8 in-person individual interviews in one practice per each U18 study (average of 1 interviews × on average 6 participants × 1 practice × 5 grants = 30 interviews), and 1 telephone interview with 1-2 participants per interview for two additional practices per each grant study (1 interview × on average 1.5 participants × 2 practices × 5 grants = 15 interviews), for an expected total of 45 interview participants per year.

Exhibit A.1a shows the estimated annualized burden hours for the respondents' time to complete the Practice Facilitator Focus Groups and Practice Leader/Staff Semi-Structured Interviews. For the three-year clearance period, the estimated annualized burden hours for the interviews are $2,190.50.

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520, comments on AHRQ's information collection are requested with regard to any of the following: (a) whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of AHRQ's health care research and health care information dissemination functions, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of AHRQ's estimate of burden (including hours and costs) of the proposed collection(s) of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information upon the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology.

Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and included in the Agency's subsequent request for OMB approval of the proposed information collection. All comments will become a matter of public record.

This notice sets out a summary of the use and burden associated with the following information collections. More detailed information can be found in each collection's supporting statement and associated materials (see ADDRESSES ).

Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor. The term “collection of information” is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) and includes agency requests or requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA requires federal agencies to publish a 60-day notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including each proposed extension or reinstatement of an existing collection of information, before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with this requirement, CMS is publishing this notice.

1. Type of Information Collection Request: New collection (Request for a new OMB control number); Title of Information Collection: Data Collection to Support CMS Burden Reduction and Health Informatics Efforts; Use: CMS seeks to establish a generic clearance that will be used to permit quick turnaround data collection projects that support CMS efforts to infuse customer perspectives, apply innovative solutions, advance standards and information technology (IT) interoperability, advance health equity, and respond to emerging priorities. CMS will utilize a range of methodologies through this generic clearance including surveys, focus groups, stakeholder/key informant interviews, cognitive interviews, site visits, and usability testing. Data collected under this generic clearance will support CMS and OBRHI efforts to reduce the burden of CMS regulations, sub-regulations, and policies as well as increasing the use of digital health tools to improve the customer experience. Obtaining feedback from CMS stakeholders is a core component of OBRHI's work to assist CMS in improving service delivery.

Form number: CMS-10830 (OMB control number: 0938-New); Frequency: Occasionally; Affected Public: Private Sector (Businesses or other for-profits and Not-for-profit institutions); Number of Respondents: 15,648; Number of Responses: 15,648; Total Burden Hours: 5,034. (For questions regarding this collection contact Réna McClain at 410-786-3975).

Contents

This notice sets out a summary of the use and burden associated with the following information collections. More detailed information can be found in each collection's supporting statement and associated materials (see ADDRESSES ).

Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor. The term “collection of information” is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) and includes agency requests or requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA requires federal agencies to publish a 60-day notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including each proposed extension or reinstatement of an existing collection of information, before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with this requirement, CMS is publishing this notice.

1. Type of Information Collection Request: New collection (Request for a new OMB control number); Title of Information Collection: Generic Clearance for CMS and Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) Generic Customer Experience; Use: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is requesting approval to collect generic feedback from respondents including, but not limited to Medicare providers, Medicare suppliers, provider or supplier staff, billers, credentialing agencies, researchers, clearinghouses, consultants, and attorneys. These surveys will give us insights into customers' perceptions and opinions and will be used to improve customer experiences and communications materials; however, the results will not be generalized to the population of study.

Improving agency programs requires ongoing systemic review of service delivery and program operations compared to defined standards. We'll use multiple methods to collect, analyze, and interpret information from this generic clearance to find the strengths and weaknesses of our current services. We'll use this feedback to inform process improvements or maintain service quality offered to providers and stakeholders. Form Number: CMS-10731 (OMB control number: 0938-New); Frequency: Occasionally; Affected Public: Private sector (business or other for-profits); Number of Respondents: 997,100; Total Annual Responses: 997,100; Total Annual Hours: 50,000. (For policy questions regarding this collection contact Alyssa Schaub-Rimel at 410-786-4660.)

2. Type of Information Collection Request: New collection (Request for a new OMB control number); Title of Information Collection: List of Screening Instruments for Housing Stability, Food Security, and Transportation Questions on Health Risk Assessments; Use: This information collection request is for the new regulation at 42 CFR 422.101(f)(1)(i) requiring that all MA SNP health risk assessments (HRAs) include at least one question from a list of screening instruments specified by CMS in sub-regulatory guidance on each of three domains (housing stability, food security, and access to transportation) beginning in CY 2024. This new requirement will help better identify the risk factors that may inhibit enrollees from accessing care and achieving optimal health outcomes and independence and enable MA SNPs to take these risk factors into account in enrollee individualized care plans. This information collection request provides the list of CMS-specified Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) screening instruments available for SNPs to meet the new requirement.

We note that the scope of the information collection currently approved under OMB control number 0938-1422 (CMS-10799) listed in the January 2022 proposed rule was too broad to include a discussion of the new regulation at 42 CFR 422.101(f)(1)(i) and the information collection requirements contained therein. Also, we did not finalize our proposal to require SNPs to use a standardized set of questions based on comments received from on the January 2022 proposed rule titled “Medicare Program; Contract Year 2023 Policy and Technical Changes to the Medicare Advantage and Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Programs” (87 FR 1842). Therefore, in accordance with the implementing regulations of the PRA at 5 CFR 1320, we did not include this information collection in OMB control number 0938-1422 (CMS-10799) and are conducting a standard PRA clearance process to obtain public comment on the list of SDOH screening instruments described in the May 2022 final rule. Form Number: CMS-10731 (OMB control number: 0938-New); Frequency: Occasionally; Affected Public: Private sector (business or other for-profits); Number of Respondents: 174; Total Annual Responses: 174; Total Annual Hours: 167. (For policy questions regarding this collection contact Michelle Conway at 202-260-7752.)

3. Type of Information Collection Request: Extension without change of a currently approved collection; Title of Information Collection: Data Collection to Support Eligibility Determinations for Small Businesses in the Small Business Health Options Program; Use: On March 23, 2010, the President signed into law H.R. 3590, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Public Law 111-148, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, Public Law 111-152. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) expands access to health insurance coverage through improvements to the Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance (CHIP) programs, the establishment of Affordable Insurance Exchanges (Exchanges), and the coordination between Medicaid, CHIP, and Exchanges. Small business employers may participate in and provide health coverage through the Small Business Health Options Program (SHOP), so long as the small business employer obtains a positive eligibility determination from SHOP. Employers will work with SHOP-registered agents/brokers or Issuers offering Qualified Health Plans (QHPs) and Qualified Dental Plans (SADPs), to enroll in SHOP coverage and to select coverage options to offer their employees. SHOP Exchanges became operational on October 1, 2013.

HHS has developed a single, streamlined form that employers use to obtain a SHOP eligibility determination, which is included as an appendix to this Information Collection Request. 45 CFR 155.731 provides more detail about this “single employer application,” which is used to determine employer eligibility. Since publication of the last package, no updates have been made in regulation concerning what information should be collected on the single employer application to determine employer eligibility under 45 CFR 155.731. When an employer completes the SHOP Eligibility Determination Form, the form and its results are retained by SHOP for future use, if needed ( e.g., reconciliation with issuer records, SHOP employer appeals, etc.). Form Number: CMS-10439 (OMB control number 0938-1193); Frequency: Annually; Affected Public: Private Sector (business or other for-profits, not-for-profit institutions); Number of Respondents: 2,100; Number of Responses: 2,100; Total Annual Hours: 336. (For questions regarding this collection contact Elliot Klein at 410-786-0415).

Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor. “Collection of information” is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c) and includes agency requests or requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a third party. The PRA requires Federal agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including each proposed extension of an existing collection of information, before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with this requirement, ACL is publishing a notice of the proposed collection of information set forth in this document.

With respect to the following collection of information, ACL invites comments on our burden estimates or any other aspect of this collection of information, including:

(1) whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of ACL's functions, including whether the information will have practical utility.

(2) the accuracy of ACL's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used to determine burden estimates.

(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

(4) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques when appropriate, and other forms of information technology.

The Administration for Community Living (ACL) is conducting process and outcome evaluations of the National Paralysis Resource Center (NPRC) to understand how and to what extent the NPRC is meeting its goals. The NPRC provides resources to people living with paralysis, their caregivers, and their support network. ACL is responsible for oversight of the NPRC, which has been administered by the Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation since its authorization in 2009. This data collection effort will be focused on evaluating specific major activities of the NPRC: (a) the Quality of Life (QOL) Grants Program; (b) the Peer and Family Support Program (PFSP); and (c) the Promotional Activities, Outreach, and Collaboration program. This evaluation seeks to identify barriers and challenges to operating the NPRC, document best practices for other Resource Centers, and recommend areas for improvement.

Specifically, this IC will help ACL to understand how each major NPRC activity aims to achieve the following goals, and to what extent the activities affect related outcomes:

To gain an in-depth understanding of the perspectives of mentors and peers participating in the PFSP, QOL program subgrantees, and people who serve as regional champions in the Promotional Activities, Outreach, and Collaboration program, eight focus groups will be conducted with no more than eight people per focus group. Additionally, a web-based survey will be administered to a maximum of 330 PFSP peers, 150 PFSP mentors, and 850 people served by QOL subgrantees to understand respondents' experiences with the NPRC.

This data will contribute to documenting how each of the NPRC's major activities are delivered and the extent to which they improve the quality of life of people living with paralysis, their caregivers, and their support networks.

Findings can inform practice for the NPRC and other Resource Centers. This evaluation will also help to identify how the NPRC can better meet the stated goals of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to, “protect and strengthen equitable access to high quality and affordable healthcare,” and to, “strengthen social well-being, equity, and economic resilience.”  1

The proposed data collection tools may be found on the ACL website for review at: https://www.acl.gov/about-acl/public-input.

Estimated Program Burden: ACL estimates the burden of this collection of information as follows:

The eight focus groups together will include no more than 64 total individuals representing three major activities of the NPRC: the QOL Grants Program; the PFSP; and the Promotional Activities, Outreach, and Collaboration program. The burden for their participation is estimated at 1.5 hours per participant, for a total of 96 hours.

A maximum of 150 PFSP mentors, 330 PFSP peers, and 850 people served by QOL subgrantee programs are expected to respond to the web-based survey, for a total of 1,330 respondents. The approximate burden for survey completion is 15 minutes for the peer mentor survey, and 10 minutes for the peer survey and QOL end-user survey per respondent.

This results in a total survey burden estimate of 14,050 minutes (234.17 hours). The estimated survey completion burden includes time to review the instructions, read the questions, and complete responses.

FDA is announcing the availability of a draft guidance for industry entitled “ Clostridioides difficile Infection: Developing Drugs for Treatment, Reduction of Recurrence, and Prevention.” The purpose of this draft guidance is to assist sponsors in the clinical development of drugs for treatment, reduction of recurrence, or prevention of CDI. Specifically, this guidance addresses FDA's current thinking regarding clinical trial design considerations such as trial populations and efficacy endpoints for treatment of CDI, reduction of recurrence, and prevention.

This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when finalized, will represent the current thinking of FDA on “ Clostridioides difficile Infection: Developing Drugs for Treatment, Reduction of Recurrence, and Prevention.” It does not establish any rights for any person and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.

While this guidance contains no collection of information, it does refer to previously approved FDA collections of information. Therefore, clearance by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521) is not required for this guidance. The previously approved collections of information are subject to review by OMB under the PRA. The collections of information relating to regulations found in 21 CFR parts 58, 312, 314, and 601 have been approved under OMB control numbers 0910-0119, 0910-0014, 0910-0001, and 0910-0338, respectively.

Persons with access to the internet may obtain the draft guidance at https://www.fda.gov/drugs/guidance-compliance-regulatory-information/guidances-drugs , https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents , or https://www.regulations.gov .

The following is a list of FDA information collections recently approved by OMB under section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507). The OMB control number and expiration date of OMB approval for each information collection are shown in table 1. Copies of the supporting statements for the information collections are available on the internet at https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

Information Collection Request Title: Enrollment and Re-Certification of Covered Entities in the 340B Drug Pricing Program, OMB No. 0915-0327—Revision.

Abstract: Section 602 of Public Law 102-585, the Veterans Health Care Act of 1992, enacted section 340B of the Public Health Service (PHS) Act, which instructs HHS to enter into a Pharmaceutical Pricing Agreement (PPA) with manufacturers of covered outpatient drugs. Manufacturers are required by section 1927(a)(5)(A) of the Social Security Act to enter into agreements with the Secretary of HHS (Secretary) that comply with section 340B of the PHS Act if they participate in the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program. When a drug manufacturer signs a PPA, it is opting into the 340B Drug Pricing Program (340B Program), and it agrees to the statutory requirement that prices charged for covered outpatient drugs to covered entities will not exceed statutorily defined 340B ceiling prices. When an eligible covered entity voluntarily decides to enroll and participate in the 340B Program, it accepts responsibility for ensuring compliance with all provisions of the 340B Program, including all associated costs. Covered entities that choose to participate in the 340B Program must comply with the requirements of section 340B(a)(5) of the PHS Act. Section 340B(a)(5)(A) of the PHS Act prohibits a covered entity from accepting a discount for a drug that would also generate a Medicaid rebate. Further, section 340B(a)(5)(B) of the PHS Act prohibits a covered entity from reselling or otherwise transferring a discounted drug to a person who is not a patient of the covered entity. A 60-day notice was published in the Federal Register on June 14, 2022, vol. 87, No. 114; pp. 35983-85. There were five comments. Some comments addressed policy issues that are outside the scope of this information collection request. HRSA responded to technical comments that pertained to the ICR and revised the draft instruments based on the comments received.

Need and Proposed Use of the Information: To ensure the ongoing responsibility to administer the 340B Program while maintaining efficiency, transparency and integrity, HRSA developed a process of registration for covered entities to enable it to address specific statutory mandates. Specifically, section 340B(a)(9) of the PHS Act requires HRSA to notify manufacturers of the identities of covered entities and of their status pertaining to certification and annual recertification in the 340B Program pursuant to section 340B(a)(7) and the establishment of a mechanism to prevent duplicate discounts as outlined at section 340B(a)(5)(A)(ii) of the PHS Act.

In addition, section 340B(a)(1) of the PHS Act requires each participating manufacturer to enter into an agreement with the Secretary in order to offer covered outpatient drugs to 340B covered entities.

Finally, section 340B(d)(1)(B)(i) of the PHS Act requires the development of a system to enable the Secretary to verify the accuracy of ceiling prices calculated by manufacturers under subsection (a)(1) and charged to covered entities.

HRSA is requesting approval for existing information collections. HRSA notes that the previously approved collections are mostly unchanged, except several forms have been revised to increase program efficiency and integrity. Below are descriptions of each of the forms and revisions that are captured in both the registration and pricing component of the 340B Office of Pharmacy Affairs Information System (OPAIS).

To enroll and certify the eligibility of federally funded grantees and other safety net health care providers, HRSA requires covered entities to submit administrative information ( e.g., shipping and billing arrangements, Medicaid participation), certifying information ( e.g., Medicare Cost Report information, documentation supporting the hospital's selected classification), and attestation from appropriate grantee level or covered entity level authorizing officials and primary contacts. To maintain accurate records, HRSA requests covered entities submit modifications to any administrative information that they submitted when initially enrolling into the 340B Program. Covered entities participating in the 340B Program have an ongoing responsibility to immediately notify HRSA in the event of any change in eligibility for the 340B Program. No less than on an annual basis, covered entities need to certify the accuracy of the information provided and continued maintenance of their eligibility and to comply with statutory mandates of the 340B Program.

Registration and annual recertification information is entered into the 340B OPAIS by covered entities and verified by HRSA staff according to 340B Program requirements. In response to the comments received, HRSA has made technical and other revisions to the draft instruments and discusses the revisions below.

1. 340B Program Registrations & Recertifications for Hospitals (applies to all hospital types): In September 2017, HRSA launched 340B OPAIS, which among other things, removed the attestation requirement from the Government Official for the classification of a parent hospital, but it was still required for the covered entity to enter the Government Official contact information. As covered entities are no longer required to obtain this attestation, HRSA is removing the requirement for the covered entity to enter the Government Official contact information in 340B OPAIS. During the first public review of this ICR, commenters agreed with removing the Government Official contact information for a parent hospital.

2. 340B Registrations & Recertifications for Ryan White Covered Entities: Previously, HRSA requested that Ryan White covered entities provide a Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) number at the time of registration and recertification. After reevaluation, HRSA has determined that the NOFO number is an unnecessary component to determine the eligibility of a Ryan White covered entity's registration. Since the NOFO number correlates to the Ryan White covered entity's Federal Grant Number, which is already required to be entered in 340B OPAIS during registration, the NOFO number is not needed. During the first public review of this ICR, commenters agreed with removing the requirement for Ryan White covered entities to provide a NOFO number at the time of registration and recertification.

3. 340B Registration, Recertification & Change Requests for Shipping Address: In the 60-day notice (87 FR 35,983, June 14, 2022), HRSA proposed to include clarifying information for covered entities to complete the shipping address section in 340B OPAIS. This information was added to assist covered entities in determining the exact shipping address location and relationship to the covered entity. In response to comments submitted during the first public review of this ICR, HRSA is removing this section from the instrument and will plan to release guidance on shipping address locations in the future.

4. 340B Program Registrations, Recertifications & Change Requests for Hospitals (applies to rural referral centers and sole community hospital covered entity types): HRSA proposed to revise the 340B OPAIS registration for the rural referral centers and sole community hospital covered entity types. If applicable, 340B OPAIS will prompt the covered entity for documentation that supports eligibility, which will be attached as part of its registration, recertification or change request submission. Currently, the request for the supporting eligibility documentation is obtained during the submission review process; therefore, this requirement would not change the burden on the covered entities.

5. 340B Program Registrations and Recertification for Authorizing Official Certification/Attestation: In the 60-day notice (87 FR 35,983, June 14, 2022), HRSA proposed to make revisions to the Authorizing Official certification by removing the requirement that any contract pharmacy arrangement is performed in accordance with OPA requirements and guidelines. Several commenters questioned why HRSA was removing this statement from the Authorizing Official's certification of a covered entity's registration or recertification in the 340B Program. HRSA removed this information as it was duplicative with information found on other instruments ( e.g., the contract pharmacy registration form) and already existed on the registration and recertification documentation. HRSA believes that this revision will reduce burden on covered entities.

6. 340B Program Change Requests for Hospitals: HRSA proposed inclusion of hospital qualification information such as, the Disproportionate Share Adjustment Percentage, control type, hospital classification, and contract start date to be changed under a change request submission as well as during recertification. This requirement would not change the burden on the covered entities, as this is an option to change the information by the hospital.

7. 340B Primary Contact and Authorizing Official Information: HRSA removed the FAX number field. This does not change the burden on covered entities, as this was an optional field.

8. 340B Program Recertifications & Change Requests for Hospitals: HRSA proposed clarifying when a covered entity would initiate a name change in 340B OPAIS. If applicable, 340B OPAIS will prompt the covered entity for documentation that supports the name change, which will be attached as part of its recertification or change request submission. In response to comments received, HRSA has made general technical and editorial revisions to this instrument.

9. Medicaid Billing Information: In the 60-day notice (87 FR 35,983, June 14, 2022), HRSA proposed to make a minor clarification regarding whether a 340B drug to an outpatient at a pharmacy or as part of a medical encounter. In response to comments submitted during the first public review of this ICR and after further consideration, HRSA is removing this section from the instrument and will plan to release future guidance on this issue.

In order to ensure that drug manufacturers and drug wholesalers recognize contract pharmacy arrangements, covered entities that elect to utilize one or more contract pharmacies are required to submit general information about their contract pharmacy arrangements and certify that signed agreements are in place with those contract pharmacies.

Section 340B(a)(1) of the PHS Act provides that a manufacturer who sells covered outpatient drugs to eligible covered entities must sign a Pharmaceutical Pricing Agreement (the “Agreement”) with the Secretary in which the manufacturer agrees to charge a price for covered outpatient drugs that will not exceed the average manufacturer price (“AMP”) decreased by a rebate percentage. In addition, section 340B(a)(1) of the PHS Act includes specific requirements, which have been incorporated in the PPA with manufacturers of covered outpatient drugs. In particular, section 340B(a)(1) includes the following requirements:

I. “Each such agreement shall require that the manufacturer furnish the Secretary with reports, on a quarterly basis, of the price for each covered outpatient drug subject to the agreement that, according to the manufacturer, represents the maximum price that covered entities may permissibly be required to pay for the drug (referred to in this section as the “ceiling price”) and

II. “. . . shall require that the manufacturer offer each covered entity covered outpatient drugs for purchase at or below the applicable ceiling price if such drug is made available to any other purchaser at any price.”

The burden imposed on manufacturers by submission of the PPA and PPA Addendum is low as the information is readily available.

In order to implement section 340B(d)(1)(B)(i)(II) of the PHS Act, HRSA developed a system to calculate 340B ceiling prices prospectively from data obtained from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services as well as a third-party commercial database. However, in order to conduct the comparison required under the statute, manufacturers must submit the quarterly pricing data as required by section 340B(d)(1)(B)(i)(II). The 340B OPAIS securely collects the following data from manufacturers on a quarterly basis: AMP, unit rebate amount, package size, case pack size, unit type, national drug code, labeler code, product code, period of sale (year and quarter), Food and Drug Administration product name, labeler name, wholesale acquisition cost, and the manufacturer determined ceiling price for each covered outpatient drug produced by a manufacturer subject to a PPA. The burden imposed on manufacturers is low because the information requested is readily available and utilized by manufacturers in other areas.

Likely Respondents: Drug manufacturers and covered entities.

Burden Statement: Burden in this context means the time expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, disclose or provide the information requested. This includes the time needed to review instructions; to develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purpose of collecting, validating and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; to train personnel and to be able to respond to a collection of information; to search data sources; to complete and review the collection of information; and to transmit or otherwise disclose the information. The total annual burden hours estimated for this ICR are summarized in the table below.

HRSA specifically requests comments on (1) the necessity and utility of the proposed information collection for the proper performance of the agency's functions, (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden, (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected, and (4) the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology to minimize the information collection burden.

FEMA proposes to make flood hazard determinations for each community listed below, in accordance with section 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).

These proposed flood hazard determinations, together with the floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by other Federal, State, or regional entities. These flood hazard determinations are used to meet the floodplain management requirements of the NFIP.

The communities affected by the flood hazard determinations are provided in the tables below. Any request for reconsideration of the revised flood hazard information shown on the Preliminary FIRM and FIS report that satisfies the data requirements outlined in 44 CFR 67.6(b) is considered an appeal. Comments unrelated to the flood hazard determinations also will be considered before the FIRM and FIS report become effective.

Use of a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) is available to communities in support of the appeal resolution process. SRPs are independent panels of experts in hydrology, hydraulics, and other pertinent sciences established to review conflicting scientific and technical data and provide recommendations for resolution. Use of the SRP only may be exercised after FEMA and local communities have been engaged in a collaborative consultation process for at least 60 days without a mutually acceptable resolution of an appeal. Additional information regarding the SRP process can be found online at https://www.floodsrp.org/pdfs/srp_overview.pdf.

The watersheds and/or communities affected are listed in the tables below. The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, FIS report for each community are available for inspection at both the online location https://hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/prelimdownload and the respective Community Map Repository address listed in the tables. For communities with multiple ongoing Preliminary studies, the studies can be identified by the unique project number and Preliminary FIRM date listed in the tables. Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.

The specific flood hazard determinations are not described for each community in this notice. However, the online location and local community map repository address where the flood hazard determination information is available for inspection is provided.

Any request for reconsideration of flood hazard determinations must be submitted to the Chief Executive Officer of the community as listed in the table below.

The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq., and with 44 CFR part 65.

The FIRM and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).

These flood hazard determinations, together with the floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by other Federal, State, or regional entities. The flood hazard determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.

The affected communities are listed in the following table. Flood hazard determination information for each community is available for inspection at both the online location and the respective community map repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) makes the final flood hazard determinations as shown in the LOMRs for each community listed in the table below. Notice of these modified flood hazard determinations has been published in newspapers of local circulation and 90 days have elapsed since that publication. The Deputy Associate Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation has resolved any appeals resulting from this notification.

The modified flood hazard determinations are made pursuant to section 206 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq., and with 44 CFR part 65. The currently effective community number is shown and must be used for all new policies and renewals.

The new or modified flood hazard information is the basis for the floodplain management measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of being already in effect in order to remain qualified for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).

This new or modified flood hazard information, together with the floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by other Federal, State, or regional entities.

This new or modified flood hazard determinations are used to meet the floodplain management requirements of the NFIP. The changes in flood hazard determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.

Interested lessees and owners of real property are encouraged to review the final flood hazard information available at the address cited below for each community or online through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) makes the final flood hazard determinations as shown in the LOMRs for each community listed in the table below. Notice of these modified flood hazard determinations has been published in newspapers of local circulation and 90 days have elapsed since that publication. The Deputy Associate Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation has resolved any appeals resulting from this notification.

The modified flood hazard determinations are made pursuant to section 206 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq., and with 44 CFR part 65. The currently effective community number is shown and must be used for all new policies and renewals.

The new or modified flood hazard information is the basis for the floodplain management measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of being already in effect in order to remain qualified for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).

This new or modified flood hazard information, together with the floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by other Federal, State, or regional entities.

This new or modified flood hazard determinations are used to meet the floodplain management requirements of the NFIP. The changes in flood hazard determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.

Interested lessees and owners of real property are encouraged to review the final flood hazard information available at the address cited below for each community or online through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov.

The Board will meet virtually on Tuesday, December 6, 2022. The meeting will be open to the public. Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. appendix.

The purpose of the Board is to review annually the programs of the National Fire Academy (Academy) and advise the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), through the United States Fire Administrator, on the operation of the Academy and any improvements therein that the Board deems appropriate. In carrying out its responsibilities, the Board examines Academy programs to determine whether these programs further the basic missions that are approved by the FEMA Administrator, examines the physical plant of the Academy to determine the adequacy of the Academy's facilities, and examines the funding levels for Academy programs. The Board submits a written annual report through the United States Fire Administrator to the FEMA Administrator. The report provides detailed comments and recommendations regarding the operation of the Academy.

On Tuesday, December 6, 2022, there will be four sessions, with deliberations and voting at the end of each session as necessary:

1. The Board will discuss United States Fire Administration Data, Research, Prevention and Response.

2. The Board will discuss deferred maintenance and capital improvements on the National Emergency Training Center campus and Fiscal Year 2023 and beyond Budget Request/Budget Planning.

3. The Board will deliberate and vote on recommendations on Academy program activities to include developments, deliveries, staffing, admissions, and strategic plan.

4. There will also be an update on the Board of Visitors Subcommittee Groups for the Professional Development Initiative Update and the National Fire Incident Report System.

There will be a 10-minute comment period after each agenda item and each speaker will be given no more than 2 minutes to speak. Please note that the public comment period may end before the time indicated following the last call for comments. Contact Deborah Gartrell-Kemp to register as a speaker. Meeting materials will be posted by November 10, 2022, at https://www.usfa.fema.gov/training/nfa/about/bov.html.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) makes the final determinations listed below for the new or modified flood hazard information for each community listed. Notification of these changes has been published in newspapers of local circulation and 90 days have elapsed since that publication. The Deputy Associate Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation has resolved any appeals resulting from this notification.

This final notice is issued in accordance with section 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4104, and 44 CFR part 67. FEMA has developed criteria for floodplain management in floodprone areas in accordance with 44 CFR part 60.

Interested lessees and owners of real property are encouraged to review the new or revised FIRM and FIS report available at the address cited below for each community or online through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov.

The flood hazard determinations are made final in the watersheds and/or communities listed in the table below.

This notice informs the public that HUD is seeking approval from OMB for the information collection described in Section A.

The Federal Register notice that solicited public comment on the information collection for a period of 60 days was published on August 29, 2022 at 87 FR 52804.

Title of Information Collection: FHA Lender Approval, Annual Renewal, Periodic Updates and Required Reports by FHA-Approved Lenders.

OMB Approval Number: 2502-0005.

OMB Expiration Date: October 31, 2022.

Type of Request: Revision.

Form Number: Online form, with no corresponding number.

Description of the need for the information and proposed use: This revision incorporates the requirements of 2 CFR 25, and 2 CFR 170, requiring all entities currently conducting or seeking to do business with the federal government must have a Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) registered in GSA's System of Award Management. Collection of the UEI is vital to HUD's compliance with the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 (FFATA) and Digital Accountability and Transparency Act of 2014.

Respondents:

Estimated Number of Respondents: 2,421.

Estimated Number of Responses: 2,430.

Frequency of Response: Annual/Periodic.

Average Hours per Response: 1 hour.

Total Estimated Burden: 2,421. 1

This notice is soliciting comments from members of the public and affected parties concerning the collection of information described in Section A on the following:

(1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond; including through the use of appropriate automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. (5) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology.

HUD encourages interested parties to submit comment in response to these questions.

Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3507.

This notice informs the public that HUD is seeking approval from OMB for the information collection described in Section A.

The Federal Register notice that solicited public comment on the information collection for a period of 60 days was published on July 12, 2022, at 87 FR 41346.

Title of Information Collection: Previous Participation Certification.

OMB Approval Number: 2502-0118.

OMB Expiration Date: November 30, 2022.

Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved collection.

Form Number: HUD Form 2530.

Description of the need for the information and proposed use: The HUD-2530 process provides review and clearance for participants in HUD's multifamily insured and non-insured projects. The information collected (participants' previous participation record) is reviewed to determine if they have carried out their past financial, legal, and administrative obligations in a satisfactory and timely manner. The HUD-2530 process requires a principal to certify to their prior participation in multifamily projects, and to disclose other information which could affect the approval for the proposed participation.

Respondents: Multifamily project participants such as owners, managers, developers, consultants, general contractors, and nursing home owners and operators.

Estimated Number of Respondents: 9,000.

Estimated Number of Responses: 9,000.

Frequency of Response: 1.

Average Hours per Response: Three hours for paper 2530 and 1 hour for electronic 2530.

Total Estimated Burden: 12,000.

This notice is soliciting comments from members of the public and affected parties concerning the collection of information described in Section A on the following:

(1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;

(2) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information;

(3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

(4) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond; including through the use of appropriate automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.

(5) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology.

HUD encourages interested parties to submit comment in response to these questions.

Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.

This notice informs the public that HUD is seeking approval from OMB for the information collection described in Section A.

Title of Information Collection: Multifamily Financial Management Template.

OMB Approval Number: 2502-0551.

Type of Request: Reinstatement, with change, of previously approved collection for which approval has expired.

Form Number: None.

Description of the need for the information and proposed use: Owners of certain HUD-insured and HUD-assisted properties, which includes most owners of multifamily housing properties are required to submit annual financial statements to HUD via the internet in the HUD-prescribed format and chart of accounts, and in accordance with the generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). In accordance with the Department's Uniform Financial Reporting Standards (UFRS) regulation, 24 CFR part 5, owners of certain HUD-insured and HUD-assisted properties are required to submit annual financial statements electronically to HUD via the internet in the HUD-prescribed format and chart of accounts, and in accordance with the generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The Department uses this information to monitor the owner's compliance with regulatory requirements and to assess fiscal performance.

Respondents: Business or other for profit.

Estimated Number of Respondents: 26,995.

Estimated Number of Responses: 26,995.

Frequency of Response: Annually.

Average Hours per Response: 14.

Total Estimated Burden: 377,930.

This notice is soliciting comments from members of the public and affected parties concerning the collection of information described in Section A on the following:

(1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;

(2) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information;

(3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

(4) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond; including through the use of appropriate automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.

HUD encourages interested parties to submit comment in response to these questions.

Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35.

This notice informs the public that HUD is seeking approval from OMB for the information collection described in Section A.

Title of Information Collection: Multifamily Project Applications and Construction Prior to Initial Endorsement.

OMB Approval Number: 2502-0029.

OMB Expiration Date: 4/30/20.

Type of Request: Reinstatement, with change, of previously approved collection for which approval has expired.

Form Number (s): HUD-92013, HUD-92013-SUPP, HUD-92013-A, HUD-92013-B, HUD-92013-C, HUD-92013-D, HUD-92264, HUD-92264-A, HUD-92273, HUD-92274, HUD-92326, HUD-92329, HUD-92331, HUD-92415, HUD-92447, HUD-92452, HUD-92485, HUD-91708, HUD-92010, FM-1006, HUD-2880, HUD-92466, (Rider Forms—HUD-92466-R1, -92466-R2, -92466-R3, -92466-R4, -92466-R5), HUD-92466M, HUD-92408 HUD-95379 and HUD-2.

Description of the need for the information and proposed use: The information collection is utilized during the processing of an application for FHA insured mortgage. The respondents are owners/sponsors, general contractors, lenders, and others involved in multifamily housing projects/rehabs. One of the options used in processing an application for FHA insured mortgage is Multifamily Application Processing (MAP). Third party contractors for mortgage insurance perform MAP. Mortgagors submit application for Multifamily Projects to an approved lender for a project to be insured by HUD. The lender's underwriters will complete all processing forms and submit them to HUD. The contractors involved are architects, cost analysts, appraisers, and mortgage credit analysts. An environmental review is also conducted, as well as a market analysis.The information collection allows the multifamily staff to determine the appropriate mortgage insurance premium to apply in the underwriting of the loan for an FHA insured mortgage.

Respondents; Individuals participating in HUD Multifamily mortgage insurance programs as principals of sponsors, mortgagors, and general contractors.

Estimated Number of Respondents: 23,588.

Estimated Number of Responses: Varies.

Frequency of Response: Varies.

Average Hours per Response: Varies.

Total Estimated Burden: 383,056.

This notice is soliciting comments from members of the public and affected parties concerning the collection of information described in Section A on the following:

(1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility;

(2) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information;

(3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

(4) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.

HUD encourages interested parties to submit comment in response to these questions.

Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. chapter 35.

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA; 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. ) and its implementing regulations in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 5 CFR 1320, we provide the general public and other Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on new, proposed, revised, and continuing collections of information. This helps us assess the impact of our information collection requirements and minimize the public's reporting burden. It also helps the public understand our information collection requirements and provide the requested data in the desired format.

On May 17, 2022, we published a notice announcing that we are proposing to renew an existing information collection with revisions (87 FR 29872). The notice opened a public comment period, which closed on July 18, 2022. Because we have additional proposed changes, we are now republishing the notice in full and reopening the comment period. Our final determination will take into consideration all written comments and any additional information we receive during both comment periods.

As part of our continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burdens, we are again soliciting comments from the public and other Federal agencies on the proposed ICR that is described below. We are especially interested in public comment addressing the following:

(1) Whether or not the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether or not the information will have practical utility;

(2) The accuracy of our estimate of the burden for this collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;

(3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

(4) How might the agency minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of response.

Comments that you submit in response to this notice are a matter of public record. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.

Abstract: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's regional migratory bird permit offices use information that we collect on permit applications to determine the eligibility of applicants for permits requested in accordance with the criteria in various Federal wildlife conservation laws and international treaties, including:

(1) Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq. ).

(2) Lacey Act (18 U.S.C. 42; 16 U.S.C. 3371 et seq. ).

(3) Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq. ).

Service regulations implementing these statutes and treaties are in chapter I, subchapter B of title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), parts 10, 13, 20, and 21. These regulations stipulate general and specific requirements that, when met, allow us to issue permits to authorize activities that are otherwise prohibited.

Generally, with the exception of forms 3-186 and 3-186a, all Service migratory bird permit application and report forms are in the 3-200 and 3-202 series of forms, each tailored to a specific activity based on the requirements for specific types of permits. We collect standard identifier information for all permits. The information that we collect on applications and reports is the minimum necessary for us to determine if the applicant meets/continues to meet issuance requirements for the particular activity.

In accordance with Federal regulations at 50 CFR 13.12, we collect standard identifier information for all permit applications, such as:

• Applicant's full name and address (street address, city, county, State, and zip code; and mailing address if different from street address); home and work telephone numbers; and a fax number and email address (if available), and

• Location where the requested permitted activity is to occur or be conducted;

• Certification containing the following language:

• Requested effective date of permit (except where issuance date is fixed by the part under which the permit is issued);

• Current date;

• Signature of the applicant;

• Such other information as the Director determines relevant to the processing of the application, including but not limited to

Standardization of general information common to the application forms makes the filing of applications easier for the public, as well as expediting our review of applications. The information that we collect on applications and reports is the minimum necessary for us to determine whether the applicant meets/continues to meet issuance requirements for the particular activity.

With this submission, we are proposing the following revisions to the existing information collection:

In 2020, the Service implemented a new automated permit application called ePermits. The ePermits system allowed the Service to move towards a streamlined permitting process to reduce the information collection burden on the public, particularly small businesses. Public burden reduction is a priority for the Service; the Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks; and senior leadership at the Department of the Interior. The ePermits system will fully automate the permitting process to improve the customer experience and to reduce time burden on respondents. This system enhances the user experience by allowing users to enter data from any device that has internet access, including personal computers, tablets, and smartphones. It also links the permit applicant to the Pay.gov system for payment of the associated permit application fee.

A user of the ePermits system registers for and uses an account which will then automatically populate the forms they complete with the required identification information. The system eliminates the need for the applicant to enter their information multiple times when they apply for multiple permits, thereby reducing burden on the applicant. The account registration process will also provide private sector users an opportunity to self-identify as a small business, which will enable the Service to more accurately report burden associated with information collection requirements placed on them.

At this time, the ePermits system is unable to fully automate Section E of the permit application process. Section E of each permit application is customized based on the permit type. We anticipate being able to begin digitizing Section E on our forms in calendar year 2022. As a result of challenges with the development of forms within the ePermits system, we do not have a timeline for full automation of Section E. We anticipate beginning the digitization of the report forms contained in this collection by 2023 and believe the digitization of Section E on application forms should be finalized by fiscal year 2024, as funding and resources become available.

We propose the following changes to certain permit application forms contained in this collection via the ePermits system, to include the following:

• Applicants will be able to select the type of business they manage (for-profit, small business, farm, not-for-profit, or government entity).

• Requesting businesses using ePermits will be asked to provide email addresses for both the principal officer and the business.

• The signature block will be replaced by with electronic submission of the online applications.

The updates to the ePermits system will also:

• Allow users to apply on behalf of another individual or business as a new way to identify if a consultant is applying for a client.

• Ask for the name of the authorized individual to include on the permit.

• Allow a business to nickname their applications.

• Ask the applicant to identify the location where the majority of the authorized activities will occur.

• Ask the applicant to identify the physical address of the preparer of application.

• Ask the applicants to identify if they are tax exempt.

• Prompt applicants to provide their preferred contact method.

• Prompt the applicant to describe changes associated with amendments or renewals (with changes) of their permit.

• Prompt applicants to opt in or out of releasing their information for all applications except migratory bird rehabilitation permits (businesses are automatically opted in).

• Prompt the applicant to provide a parent permit number, which allows the ePermits System to direct the user to the correct version of their permit for renewals or amendments to a permit.

In addition to the ePermits changes listed above, we propose the below listed changes to the questions within Section E of four application forms in this collection:

• Question 1:

• General:

• Add a question regarding whether institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) approval is required. If Yes, provide your approval or copy of your application.

• Add a yes/no check box to indicate whether there are any subpermittees.

• Rephrase question 4 to clarify subpermittee names.

• Question 8:

• General: Add a new question as follows: Is the applicant operating under an existing NEPA document? If yes, include the title of document, status (draft/final), and date(s) published. The applicant may be required to submit a copy of the document.

In addition to the form-specific updates listed above, we propose to update Section E on all of the application forms to indicate which questions are required for renewal.

We also propose the following changes to the below listed report forms in this collection:

• In the reporting table header, the following changes are being proposed:

The Service is revising Form 3-202-17 as a result of a close review and enhancement of the Injury and Mortality Reporting (IMR) system, which bases the information it collects on the fields and information collected in Form 3-202-17. The changes are expected to result in an overall burden reduction to the public and an overall improved user experience as a result of the net reduction in fields and the streamlining and update of both the Excel form and IMR user interface. Creation of a project record prior to logging injury/mortality records will now be optional, which should reduce the burden for some users.

We propose the following changes to the form and system, including fields being removed, overall system improvements, and field additions:

• Removal of 26 fields from the form:

• System modifications to streamlining actions and added efficiency for IMR system users:

• Adding 14 fields to the form:

We propose to modify Form 3-186A to update the field “USFWS Band Number” to say “USFWS/State/Tribe/Territory band number” and ”USFWS Permit Number” to say “USFWS/State/Tribe/Territory permit number.”

With this submission, we will seek OMB approval of the Migratory Bird Permit Program Handbook (Handbook) and associated Service Manual chapters at 724 FW 1 (“Migratory Bird Permits”) and 724 FW 2 (“Migratory Bird Management”), all of which contain references to information collections. The Handbook provides detailed procedures and other operational information to implement the Service Manual chapters in part 724 and more generally in part 720.

New and existing information collections contained in the Handbook requiring OMB approval include the following:

• Renewal procedures associated with the reauthorization of an existing permit (with or without changes to the conditions);

• Reinstatement procedures associated with the reauthorization of an existing permit (with or without changes to the conditions);

• Discontinuance procedures at the permittee's request to discontinue a valid permit;

• Solicitation of appropriate documentation from entities authorized to act on behalf of State, local, Tribal, and Federal government agencies to verify their exempt status for fee-exemption purposes;

• Fee waiver request process as outlined in 50 CFR 13.11(d)(3)(iii);

• Requests for reconsideration of a denial, partial denial, suspension, or revocation of a permit (requiring submission of a written request with the required information in 50 CFR 13.29(b) within 45 days after the permit decision); and

• Appeals of reconsideration request decisions (requiring the permittee submit a written request to the Regional Director (see 50 CFR 13.29(e)) within 45 days of the reconsideration decision).

With this submission, we will request OMB approval to consolidate the following information collections currently approved under OMB Control No. 1018-0175 (expires 1/31/2024, viewable at https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewICR?ref_nbr=202010-1018-003 ) into information collection 1018-0022:

• FWS Form 3-200-90, Special Double-Crested Cormorant Permit Application (and amendments, as appropriate) —This permit is available only to State or Tribal fish and wildlife agencies responsible for migratory bird management on lands and in waters managed by those agencies within their jurisdictions. Under this permit, the Service authorizes State and Tribal fish and wildlife agencies to conduct lethal take to reduce conflicts involving depredation at State- and Tribal-owned or operated aquaculture facilities (including hatcheries); impacts to health and human safety; impacts to threatened and endangered species (as listed under the ESA and listed species identified in State- or Tribal-specific legislation as threatened or endangered) or those listed as species of greatest conservation need in State wildlife action plans; damage to State- or Tribal-owned property and assets; and depredations of wild and publicly stocked fish managed by State fish and wildlife agencies or federally recognized Tribes and accessible to the public or all Tribal members. Take activities to prevent depredation on aquatic species of greatest conservation need may occur only in natural or public waters.

Any State or Tribal fish and wildlife agency wishing to obtain a permit must submit to the appropriate Regional Director Form 3-200-90, containing the general information and certification required by 50 CFR 13.12(a). These annual permits, managed by calendar year, allow for alignment with permit processing cycles and the need to evaluate allocation at the beginning of a calendar year. Section E of each application collects information specific to the activity the applicant wishes to conduct, as well as information concerning:

(1) A brief description of the State's or Tribe's double-crested cormorant conflicts, including physical location(s) and type of conflict;

(2) A detailed description of the nonlethal methods ( i.e., active hazing, passive hazing, habitat management, and changes in management practices) that the applicant has and/or will implement, and how activities will address one or more of the issues;

(3) The requested annual take of double-crested cormorants by life-stage, including eggs and nests;

(4) A description of long-term plans to eliminate or significantly reduce continued need to take double-crested cormorants;

(5) A statement indicating that the State or Tribe will inform and brief all employees and subpermittees of the requirements of these regulations and permit conditions;

(6) A list of all subpermittees who may conduct activities under the special double-crested cormorant permit, including their names, addresses, and telephone numbers; and

(7) The name and telephone number of the individual in your agency who will oversee the double-crested cormorant management activities authorized under the permit.

• FWS Form 3-202-56, Annual Report—Special Double-Crested Cormorant —In conjunction with issuance of the special double-crested cormorant permit, the Service requires that the permittee submit Form 3-202-56 detailing activities, including the date, numbers, and locations and life stages of birds, eggs, and nests taken and nonlethal techniques utilized, by January 31 for activities conducted during the preceding calendar year. We collect the following information via Form 3-202-56 to ensure that the applicant remains in compliance with the terms of their permit:

(1) Permittee contact information, permit number, permit calendar year, and permit report due date;

(2) Description of non-lethal techniques utilized;

(3) Month and location of activity;

(4) Purpose;

(5) Numbers of birds killed, nests oiled, and/or nests destroyed;

(6) Final Disposition (what they did with the birds, eggs, carcasses [ e.g., buried; incinerated; euthanized and donated]); and

(7) Take of non-target bird species, including numbers of birds.

• Recordkeeping —Any State or Tribal agency, when exercising the privileges of this permit, must keep records of all activities, including those of subpermittees, carried out under the authority of the special permit.

• Landowner Notifications —If a State or Tribe must enter private property to access State and Tribal lands or waters where take is approved in their permit, the State or Tribe must obtain authorization from the private property owner.

The public may request copies of any form or document contained in this information collection by sending a request to the Service Information Collection Clearance Officer in ADDRESSES , above.

Title of Collection: Federal Fish and Wildlife Permit Applications and Reports—Migratory Birds; 50 CFR 10, 13, 20, and 21.

OMB Control Number: 1018-0022.

Form Numbers: FWS Forms 3-186, 3-186A, 3-200-6 through 3-200-9, 3-200-10a through 3-200-10c, 3-200-10e, 3-200-10f, 3-200-12 through 3-200-13, 3-200-67, 3-200-79, 3-200-81, 3-202-1 through 3-202-10, 3-202-12, 3-202-17, 3-200-90, and 3-202-56.

Type of Review: Revision of an existing information collection.

Respondents/Affected Public: Individuals; private sector (including zoological parks, museums, universities, scientists, taxidermists, businesses, and utilities); and State, local, Tribal, and Federal governments.

Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain a benefit.

Frequency of Collection: On occasion for applications; annually or on occasion for reports.

Total Estimated Annual Nonhour Burden Cost: $491,050 (primarily associated with application processing fees in OMB Control No. 1018-0022).

An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

The authority for this action is the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. ).

We invite the public and local, State, Tribal, and Federal agencies to comment on applications. Before issuing any requested permits, we take into consideration any information that we receive during the public comment period.

You may submit your comments and materials by one of the methods in ADDRESSES . We will not consider comments sent by email or fax, or to an address not in ADDRESSES . We will not consider or include in our administrative record comments we receive after the close of the comment period (see DATES ).

When submitting comments, please specify the name of the applicant and the permit number at the beginning of your comment. Provide sufficient information to allow us to authenticate any scientific or commercial data you include. The comments and recommendations that will be most useful and likely to influence agency decisions are: (1) Those supported by quantitative information or studies; and (2) those that include citations to, and analyses of, the applicable laws and regulations.

You may view and comment on others' public comments at https://www.regulations.gov unless our allowing so would violate the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a) or Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552).

If you submit a comment at https://www.regulations.gov, your entire comment, including any personal identifying information, will be posted on the website. If you submit a hardcopy comment that includes personal identifying information, such as your address, phone number, or email address, you may request at the top of your document that we withhold this information from public review. However, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Moreover, all submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, will be made available for public disclosure in their entirety.

To help us carry out our conservation responsibilities for affected species, and in consideration of section 104(c) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended (MMPA; 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq. ), we invite public comments on permit applications before final action is taken. With some exceptions, MMPA prohibits certain activities with listed species unless Federal authorization is issued that allows such activities. Service regulations regarding prohibited activities with endangered species, captive-bred wildlife registrations, and permits for any activity otherwise prohibited by the ESA with respect to any endangered species are available in title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations in part 17. Service regulations regarding permits for any activity otherwise prohibited by the MMPA with respect to any marine mammals are available in title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations in part 18. Concurrent with publishing this notice in the Federal Register , we are forwarding copies of the marine mammal applications to the Marine Mammal Commission and the Committee of Scientific Advisors for their review.

We invite comments on the following applications.

The applicant requests a permit to capture/recapture, transport, immobilize, hold, administer drugs to, flipper tag, surgically implant transmitters inside, measure, collect biological samples from, and release northern sea otter ( Enhydra lutris kenyoni ) in the wild for the purpose of scientific research. This notification covers activities to be conducted by the applicant over a 5-year period.

The applicant requests a permit to photograph (video and photos) Pacific walrus ( Odobenus rosmarus ) in the wild at Round Island, AK, for the purpose of commercial photography. This notification covers activities to be conducted by the applicant over a 5-year period.

After the comment period closes, we will make decisions regarding permit issuance. If we issue permits to the applicants listed in this notice, we will publish a notice in the Federal Register . You may locate the notice announcing the permit issuance by searching https://www.regulations.gov for the permit number listed above in this document. For example, to find information about the potential issuance of Permit No. 12345A, you would go to regulations.gov and search for “12345A”.

We issue this notice under the authority of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq. ), and its implementing regulations.

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. ) and its implementing regulations at 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1), all information collections require approval under the PRA. We may not conduct or sponsor and you are not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

On July 6, 2022, we published a Federal Register notice with a 60-day public comment period soliciting comments on this collection of information (87 FR 40261). In that notice, we solicited comments for 60 days, ending on September 6, 2022. In an effort to increase public awareness of, and participation in, our public commenting processes associated with information collection requests, the Service also published the Federal Register notice on https://www.regulations.gov [Docket No. FWS-R4-OSA-2022-0086]. We received one comment in response to that notice which did not address the information collection requirements; therefore, no response was required.

As part of our continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burdens, we invite the public and other Federal agencies to comment on new, proposed, revised, and continuing collections of information. This helps us assess the impact of our information collection requirements and minimize the public's reporting burden. It also helps the public understand our information collection requirements and provide the requested data in the desired format.

We are especially interested in public comment addressing the following:

(1) Whether or not the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether or not the information will have practical utility;

(2) The accuracy of our estimate of the burden for this collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;

(3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

(4) How might the agency minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of response.

Comments that you submit in response to this notice are a matter of public record. We will include or summarize each comment in our request to OMB to approve this ICR. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.

Abstract: The Fish and Wildlife Act of 1956 (16 U.S.C. 742d) designates the Department of the Interior as a key agency responsible for the conservation and protection of wildlife and fisheries resources in the United States. This responsibility requires the Service to gather accurate data on conservation efforts through means such as research to improve the development, management, and advancement of efforts. The Service's Science Applications and Migratory Bird Program in the Service's Southeast Region is seeking to conduct a social network analysis to collect information regarding regional conservation efforts, conservation partnership goals, structure, and focal geography, and the connectedness of these efforts and partnerships. The proposed survey collects information necessary to address this gap in understanding and will serve to advance the Southeast Conservation Adaptation Strategy's (SECAS) leadership role as a regional forum and decision-support hub.

The proposed survey collects the following information:

• Familiarity and engagement with SECAS, including satisfaction with SECAS aspects and importance of SECAS indicators (section 2);

• Organizational conservation priorities, including level of importance and usefulness of and reliance on SECAS resources (section 3);

• Conservation partnerships, including identification of partner organizations and collaboration types (section 4); and

• Organizational information, including type of organization and scope of work (section 5).

The information collected in this effort will be used to develop multiple products aimed at translating the data into information that can strengthen partnerships, identify gaps, and inform conservation decisions.

The public may request a copy of the proposed survey instrument by sending a request to the Service Information Collection Clearance Officer (see ADDRESSES , above).

Title of Collection: Southeast Conservation Adaptation Strategy (SECAS) Social Network Analysis.

OMB Control Number: 1018-New.

Form Number: None.

Type of Review: New.

Respondents/Affected Public: Leaders and executives in the private sector and State, local, and Tribal governments in the Service's Southeast Region.

Total Estimated Number of Annual Respondents: 200 (100 private sector entities and 100 State/local/Tribal governments).

Total Estimated Number of Annual Responses: 200.

Estimated Completion Time per Response: 15 minutes.

Total Estimated Number of Annual Burden Hours: 50.

Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.

Frequency of Collection: One time.

Total Estimated Annual Nonhour Burden Cost: There is no cost associated with the survey.

An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

The authority for this action is the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. ).

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we provide the general public and other Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on new, proposed, revised, and continuing collections of information. This helps us assess the impact of our information collection requirements and minimize the public's reporting burden. It also helps the public understand our information collection requirements and provide the requested data in the desired format.

A Federal Register notice with a 60-day public comment period soliciting comments on this collection of information was published on July 22, 2022 (87 FR 43889). No comments were received.

As part of our continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burdens, we are again soliciting comments from the public and other Federal agencies on the proposed ICR that is described below. We are especially interested in public comment addressing the following:

(1) Whether or not the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether or not the information will have practical utility;

(2) The accuracy of our estimate of the burden for this collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used;

(3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and

(4) How might the agency minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of response.

Comments that you submit in response to this notice are a matter of public record. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.

Abstract: Congress passed legislation specifically addressing oil and gas leasing on Osage lands and requiring Secretarial approval of leases. See 34 Stat. 543, section 3, as amended. The regulations at 25 CFR 226 implement that statute by specifying what information a lessee must provide related to drilling, development, and production of oil and gas on Osage reservation land. The oil, gas, and land are assets that the United States holds in trust or restricted status for Indian beneficiaries. The information collections in 25 CFR 226 are necessary to ensure that the beneficial owners of the mineral rights are provided the royalties due them, ensure that the oil and gas trust assets are protected, and to ensure that the surface estate assets are protected.

Title of Collection: Leasing of Osage Reservation lands for Oil and Gas Mining.

OMB Control Number: 1076-0180.

Form Number: Form A, Form B, Form C, Form D, Form F, Form H, Form G, Form 101, Form 101A, Form 133, Form 139, Form 157, Form 208, Form 229, Form 300.

Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.

Respondents/Affected Public: Individual Indians, businesses, and Tribal authorities.

Total Estimated Number of Annual Respondents: 1,001.

Total Estimated Number of Annual Responses: 48,539.

Estimated Completion Time per Response: Varies from 15 minutes to eight hours.

Total Estimated Number of Annual Burden Hours: 22,731.

Respondent's Obligation: Required to Obtain or Retain a Benefit.

Frequency of Collection: Varies from yearly to monthly.

Total Estimated Annual Nonhour Burden Cost: 4,535.

An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

The authority for this action is the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. ).

This meeting is being held under the PROGRESS Act (Pub. L. 116-180), the Negotiated Rulemaking Act (5 U.S.C. 561 et seq. ), and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2). The Committee is to negotiate and reach consensus on recommendations for a proposed rule that will replace the existing regulations at 25 CFR part 1000. The Committee will be charged with developing proposed regulations for the Secretary's implementation of the PROGRESS Act's provisions regarding the Department of the Interior's (DOI) Self-Governance Program.

The PROGRESS Act amends subchapter I of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA), 25 U.S.C. 5301 et seq., which addresses Indian Self-Determination, and subchapter IV of the ISDEAA which addresses DOI's Tribal Self-Governance Program. The PROGRESS Act also authorizes the Secretary to adapt negotiated rulemaking procedures to the unique context of self-governance and the government-to-government relationship between the United States and Indian Tribes. The Federal Register (87 FR 30256) notice published on May 18, 2022, discussed the issues to be negotiated and the members of the Committee.

These meetings are open to the public. Detailed information about the Committee, including meeting agendas can be accessed at https://www.bia.gov/service/progress-act. Topics for these meetings may include Committee operating protocols, negotiated rulemaking process, schedule and agenda setting for future meetings, Committee caucus, and public comment.

The third Plenary Committee meeting will begin at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, November 14, 2022. Members of the public wishing to attend the meeting should visit https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_ODZkOWE3NzItOWE5ZC00MzcwLTlhMzgtODQ0ZDAxMGY0Y2E4%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%220693b5ba-4b18-4d7b-9341-f32f400a5494%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%2213321130-a12b-4290-8bcf-30387057bd7b%22%2c%22IsBroadcastMeeting%22%3atrue%7d&btype=a&role=a for virtual access.

The fourth Plenary Committee meeting will begin at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, December 16, 2022. Members of the public wishing to attend the meeting should visit https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_YjM2ZTVjNTAtZTlmOS00MmE5LWFkNGQtNzIxYjJjNmY5YTIy%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%220693b5ba-4b18-4d7b-9341-f32f400a5494%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%2213321130-a12b-4290-8bcf-30387057bd7b%22%2c%22IsBroadcastMeeting%22%3atrue%7d&btype=a&role=a for virtual access.

Please make requests in advance for sign language interpreter services, assistive listening devices, or other reasonable accommodations. We ask that you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this notice at least seven (7) business days prior to the meeting to give the Department of the Interior sufficient time to process your request. All reasonable accommodation requests are managed on a case-by-case basis.

Depending on the number of people who want to comment and the time available, the amount of time for individual oral comments may be limited. Requests to address the Committee during the meeting will be accommodated in the order the requests are received. Individuals who wish to expand upon their oral statements, or those who had wished to speak but could not be accommodated on the agenda, may submit written comments to the Designated Federal Officer up to 30 days following the meeting. Written comments may be sent to Vickie Hanvey listed in the ADDRESSES section above.

Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.

Authority: 5 U.S.C. Appendix 2.

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. ) and 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1), all information collections require approval under the PRA.

As part of our continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burdens, we invite the public and other Federal agencies to comment on new, proposed, revised, and continuing collections of information. This helps us assess the impact of our information collection requirements and minimize the public's reporting burden. It also helps the public understand our information collection requirements and provide the requested data in the desired format.

We are especially interested in public comment addressing the following:

(1) Whether or not the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether or not the information will have practical utility.

(2) The accuracy of our estimate of the burden for this collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used.

(3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected.

(4) How might the agency minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of response.

Comments that you submit in response to this notice are a matter of public record. We will include or summarize each comment in our request to OMB to approve this ICR. Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.

Abstract: The Federal Historic Preservation Tax Incentives Program encourages private-sector investment in the rehabilitation and re-use of historic buildings. Through this program, underutilized or vacant buildings throughout the country of every period, size, style, and type have been rehabilitated and reused in a manner that maintains their historic character. To be eligible for tax incentives for historic buildings, a building must be listed individually on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP); or located in a registered historic district and certified by the NPS as contributing to the historic significance of that district. A registered historic district is any district listed on the NRHP; or a state or local district if the district and the enabling statute have also been certified by the NPS. The NRHP is the official list of the Nation's historic places worthy of preservation.

Section 47 of the Internal Revenue Code requires that the Secretary of the Interior certify to the Secretary of the Treasury upon application by owners of historic properties for Federal tax benefits: (a) the historic significance of the property and (b) that the rehabilitation work is consistent with its historic character. The NPS administers the program with the Internal Revenue Service in partnership with the State Historic Preservation Offices (SHPOs). The NPS uses the information collected in the Historic Preservation Certification Application (Forms 10-168, 10-168a, 10-168b, and 10-168c) to evaluate the condition and historic significance of buildings undergoing rehabilitation and to evaluate whether or not the rehabilitation work meets the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. The program is moving towards an electronic system (SharePoint site) for the submission and review process of the application within the next fiscal year, 2023.

Regulations codified in 36 CFR part 67 contain a requirement for completion of an application form. The NPS uses the information collected on the application form to allow the authorized officer to determine if the project is qualified to obtain historic preservation certifications from the Secretary of the Interior. These certifications are necessary for an applicant to receive substantial federal tax incentives authorized by section 47 of the Internal Revenue Code. These incentives include a 20% federal income tax credit for the rehabilitation of income-producing historic buildings and an income tax deduction for the charitable donation of easements on historic properties. The Internal Revenue Code also provided a 10% federal income tax credit for the rehabilitation of non-historic, nonresidential buildings built before 1936. An owner of a non-historic building in a historic district must also use the application to obtain a certification from the Secretary of the Interior that his or her building does not contribute to the significance of the historic district before claiming this lesser tax credit for rehabilitation. The 10% credit was repealed as part of the 2017 tax reform legislation but may remain in effect under certain transition rules.

SHPOs are the first point of contact for property owners wishing to use the rehabilitation tax credits. They help applicants determine if a historic building is eligible for Federal or State historic preservation tax incentives, provide guidance on an application before or after the project begins, and provide advice on appropriate preservation work. SHPOs use Forms 10-168d and 10-168e to make recommendations to NPS.

In accordance with 36 CFR 67, we also collect information for:

(1) certifications of State and local statutes (§ 67.8),

(2) certifications of State or local historic districts (§ 67.9), and

(3) appeals (§ 67.10).

Title of Collection: Historic Preservation Certification Application.

OMB Control Number: 1024-0009.

Form Number: NPS Forms 10-168, 10-168a, 10-168b, 10-168c, 10-168d, 10-168e.

Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.

Respondents/Affected Public: Individuals, organizations, companies and businesses, and State or tribal governments.

Total Estimated Number of Annual Respondents: 11,874.

Total Estimated Number of Annual Responses: 11,874.

Estimated Completion Time per Response: Estimates vary from 3 to 51 hours depending on activity.

Total Estimated Number of Annual Burden Hours: 126,577.

Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain a benefit.

Frequency of Collection: On occasion.

Total Estimated Annual Nonhour Burden Cost: $3,973,359 based primarily on application fees and other costs (includes: printing photographs and architectural drawings).

An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

The authority for this action is the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. ).