<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><BillSummaries>
    <item congress="118" measure-type="hr" measure-number="1505" measure-id="id118hr1505" originChamber="HOUSE" orig-publish-date="2023-03-09" update-date="2024-12-09">
        <title>No Stolen Trademarks Honored in America Act of 2023</title>
        <summary summary-id="id118hr1505v49" currentChamber="BOTH" update-date="2024-12-09">
            <action-date>2024-12-01</action-date>
            <action-desc>Public Law</action-desc>
            <summary-text><![CDATA[<p><strong>No Stolen Trademarks Honored in America Act of 2023</strong></p><p>This act modifies the bar against U.S. courts enforcing or validating trademarks that were confiscated by the Cuban government.</p><p>The act prohibits U.S. courts and executive branch agencies from enforcing or validating such confiscated trademarks if the mark has been used in connection with a confiscated business or asset. Currently, the prohibition is limited to U.S. courts and applies only if the confiscated trademark is being asserted in the United States by a Cuban national.</p><p>Under the act, the prohibition shall not apply if the original trademark owner, or a successor, has expressly consented to the enforcement action.</p><p>The prohibition shall apply only if the entity asserting the trademark rights knew or should have known, when it acquired the rights, that the mark was the same or substantially similar to one connected to a confiscated business or asset.</p>]]></summary-text>
        </summary>
        <summary summary-id="id118hr1505v55" currentChamber="SENATE" update-date="2024-12-10">
            <action-date>2024-11-19</action-date>
            <action-desc>Passed Senate</action-desc>
            <summary-text><![CDATA[<p><strong>No Stolen Trademarks Honored in America Act of 2023</strong></p><p>This bill modifies the bar against U.S. courts enforcing or validating trademarks that were confiscated by the Cuban government.</p><p>The bill prohibits U.S. courts and executive branch agencies from enforcing or validating such confiscated trademarks if the mark has been used in connection with a confiscated business or asset. Currently, the prohibition is limited to U.S. courts and applies only if the confiscated trademark is being asserted in the United States by a Cuban national.</p><p>Under the bill, the prohibition shall not apply if the original trademark owner, or a successor, has expressly consented to the enforcement action.</p><p>The prohibition shall apply only if the entity asserting the trademark rights knew or should have known, when it acquired the rights, that the mark was the same or substantially similar to one connected to a confiscated business or asset.</p>]]></summary-text>
        </summary>
        <summary summary-id="id118hr1505v53" currentChamber="HOUSE" update-date="2023-11-20">
            <action-date>2023-11-13</action-date>
            <action-desc>Passed House</action-desc>
            <summary-text><![CDATA[ <p><b>No Stolen Trademarks Honored in America Act of 2023</b></p> <p>This bill modifies the bar against U.S. courts enforcing or validating trademarks that were confiscated by the Cuban government. </p> <p>The bill prohibits U.S. courts and executive branch agencies from enforcing or validating such confiscated trademarks if the mark has been used in connection with a confiscated business or asset. Currently, the prohibition is limited to U.S. courts and applies only if the confiscated trademark is being asserted in the United States by a Cuban national. </p> <p>Under the bill, the prohibition shall not apply if the original trademark owner, or a successor, has expressly consented to the enforcement action.</p> <p>The prohibition shall apply only if the entity asserting the trademark rights knew or should have known, when it acquired the rights, that the mark was the same or substantially similar to one connected to a confiscated business or asset.</p>]]></summary-text>
        </summary>
        <summary summary-id="id118hr1505v07" currentChamber="HOUSE" update-date="2023-11-14">
            <action-date>2023-09-29</action-date>
            <action-desc>Reported to House</action-desc>
            <summary-text><![CDATA[ <p><b>No Stolen Trademarks Honored in America Act of 2023</b></p> <p>This bill modifies the bar against U.S. courts enforcing or validating trademarks that were confiscated by the Cuban government. </p> <p>The bill prohibits U.S. courts and executive branch agencies from enforcing or validating such confiscated trademarks if the mark has been used in connection with a confiscated business or asset. Currently, the prohibition is limited to U.S. courts and applies only if the confiscated trademark is being asserted in the United States by a Cuban national. </p> <p>Under the bill, the prohibition shall not apply if the original trademark owner, or a successor, has expressly consented to the enforcement action.</p> <p>The prohibition shall apply only if the entity asserting the trademark rights knew or should have known, when it acquired the rights, that the mark was the same or substantially similar to one connected to a confiscated business or asset.</p>]]></summary-text>
        </summary>
        <summary summary-id="id118hr1505v00" currentChamber="HOUSE" update-date="2023-11-14">
            <action-date>2023-03-09</action-date>
            <action-desc>Introduced in House</action-desc>
            <summary-text><![CDATA[ <p><b>No Stolen Trademarks Honored in America Act</b></p> <p>This bill modifies the bar against U.S. courts enforcing or validating trademarks that were confiscated by the Cuban government. </p> <p>The bill prohibits U.S. courts and executive branch agencies from enforcing or validating such confiscated trademarks if the mark has been used in connection with a confiscated business or asset. Currently, the prohibition is limited to U.S. courts and applies only if the confiscated trademark is being asserted in the United States by a Cuban national. </p> <p>Under the bill, the prohibition shall not apply if the original trademark owner, or a successor, has expressly consented to the enforcement action.</p> <p>The prohibition shall apply only if the entity asserting the trademark rights knew or should have known, when it acquired the rights, that the mark was the same or substantially similar to one connected to a confiscated business or asset.</p>]]></summary-text>
        </summary>
    </item>
    <dublinCore xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
        <dc:format>text/xml</dc:format>
        <dc:language>EN</dc:language>
        <dc:rights>Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.</dc:rights>
        <dc:contributor>Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress</dc:contributor>
        <dc:description>This file contains bill summaries for federal legislation. A bill summary describes the most significant provisions of a piece of legislation and details the effects the legislative text may have on current law and federal programs. Bill summaries are authored by the Congressional Research Service (CRS) of the Library of Congress. As stated in Public Law 91-510 (2 USC 166 (d)(6)), one of the duties of CRS is "to prepare summaries and digests of bills and resolutions of a public general nature introduced in the Senate or House of Representatives". For more information, refer to the User Guide that accompanies this file.</dc:description>
    </dublinCore>
</BillSummaries>
