3.0.0 343 2023-01-11T13:22:40Z 2023-01-11T13:22:40Z House H HRES 2011-07-08 112 hsju00 Judiciary Committee House Standing hsju10 Constitution and Limited Government Subcommittee Referred to 2011-08-25T19:17:16Z Referred to 2011-07-08T13:01:25Z hsif00 Energy and Commerce Committee House Standing hsif14 Health Subcommittee Referred to 2011-07-15T19:59:21Z Referred to 2011-07-08T13:01:20Z 2011-08-25 hsju10 Constitution and Limited Government Subcommittee 1 House committee actions Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution. Committee 2011-07-15 hsif14 Health Subcommittee 1 House committee actions Referred to the Subcommittee on Health. Committee 2011-07-08 Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. IntroReferral H11100 2 House floor actions hsju00 Judiciary Committee 2011-07-08 Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned. IntroReferral H11100 2 House floor actions hsif00 Energy and Commerce Committee 2011-07-08 Introduced in House IntroReferral Intro-H 9 Library of Congress 2011-07-08 Introduced in House IntroReferral 1000 9 Library of Congress M000133 Rep. Markey, Edward J. [D-MA-7] Edward Markey D MA J. 7 N Health First Amendment rights Health care costs and insurance Health information and medical records Health personnel Marketing and advertising Prescription drugs Right of privacy State and local government operations Supreme Court Health 00 2011-07-08 Introduced in House 2011-08-09T20:53:19Z Disapproves of the majority opinion in Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc., because it puts prescribers at risk of having their prescriber-identifying information sold without their knowledge or consent.

Expresses the belief of the House of Representatives that: (1) the Supreme Court incorrectly applied a heightened First Amendment standard of review to an instance of commercial regulation; (2) the negative impact on a pharmaceutical manufacturer's ability to market its products is outweighed by the interests of patient safety, doctor privacy, and health care costs; and (3) the states have the right to regulate the pharmaceutical industry based on what is best for the health and safety of their residents.

]]> Expressing disapproval of the decision by the Supreme Court in Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. Display Title Expressing disapproval of the decision by the Supreme Court in Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. Official Title as Introduced Expressing disapproval of the decision by the Supreme Court in Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. Introduced in House IH Introduced in House 2011-07-08T04:00:00Z https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-112hres343ih/xml/BILLS-112hres343ih.xml 2011-08-25 Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution. text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress This file contains bill summaries and statuses for federal legislation. A bill summary describes the most significant provisions of a piece of legislation and details the effects the legislative text may have on current law and federal programs. Bill summaries are authored by the Congressional Research Service (CRS) of the Library of Congress. As stated in Public Law 91-510 (2 USC 166 (d)(6)), one of the duties of CRS is "to prepare summaries and digests of bills and resolutions of a public general nature introduced in the Senate or House of Representatives". For more information, refer to the User Guide that accompanies this file.