119 S2550 RS: Critical Minerals Partnership Act of 2025 U.S. Senate 2025-10-30 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.

Short title

This Act may be cited as the

Critical Minerals Partnership Act of 2025

Definition of critical mineral

In this Act, the term critical mineral—(1)has the meaning given the term in section 7002 of the Energy Act of 2020 (30 U.S.C. 1606); and(2)includes any other mineral or mineral material determined by the Secretary of State—(A)to be essential to the economic or national security of the United States; and(B)to have a supply chain vulnerable to disruption.

Statement of policy on critical mineral supply chains

It is the policy of the United States—(1)to collaborate with allies and partners of the United States to build secure and resilient critical minerals supply chains, including in the mining, processing, reclamation and recycling, and valuation of critical minerals;(2)to prioritize the development and production of critical mineral resources domestically, including through improvement of systems for collecting and recycling critical minerals from used and discarded goods or equipment, both to supply domestic needs and for export to allies and partners that participate in secure and resilient supply chains for critical minerals;(3)to reduce or eliminate reliance and dependence on critical mineral supply chains controlled by the People’s Republic of China, the Russian Federation, Iran, or any other adversary of the United States;(4)to work with allies and partners on enhancing evaluation capability and technology in trusted countries that produce critical minerals to avoid the export of critical minerals, or products or components that are dependent on critical minerals, that are controlled by adversaries of the United States;(5)to identify and implement market-based incentives for the purposes of facilitating the creation and maintenance of secure and resilient critical mineral supply chains, including for reclamation and recycling of critical mineral resources from waste streams, in collaboration with allies and partners;(6)to prioritize securing critical mineral supply chains in United States foreign policy, including through the use of economic tools to invest responsibly in projects in partner countries in a manner that both benefits local populations and bolsters the supply of critical minerals to the United States and allies and partners of the United States; and(7)that collaboration with allies and partners to build secure and resilient critical mineral supply chains shall not replace United States efforts to increase domestic development and production or recycling of critical minerals.

International negotiations relating to protecting critical mineral supply chains

(a)

In general

The President is authorized to negotiate an agreement with international partners for the purposes of establishing a coalition—(1)to facilitate—(A)the mining, processing, recycling, and enhanced access to the supply of critical minerals; and(B)advanced manufacturing that relies on the practical application of critical minerals; and(2)to secure an adequate supply of critical minerals and relevant products, manufacturing inputs, and components that are heavily dependent on critical mineral resource inputs for the United States and other members of the coalition (in this section referred to as member countries).(b)

Negotiating objectives

The overall objectives for negotiating an agreement described in subsection (a) should be—(1)to establish mechanisms for member countries to build secure and resilient supply chains for critical minerals, including in—(A)the mining, refinement, reclamation and recycling, processing, and valuation of critical minerals; and(B)advanced manufacturing of products, components, and materials that are dependent on critical minerals;(2)to improve economies of scale and joint cooperation with international partners in securing access and means of production throughout the supply chains of critical minerals and manufacturing processes dependent on critical minerals;(3)to establish mechanisms, with appropriate market-based disciplines, that provide and maintain opportunities among member countries for creating industry economies of scale to attract joint investment among those countries, including—(A)cooperation on joint projects, including cost-sharing on building appropriate infrastructure to access deposits of critical minerals; and(B)creation or enhancement of national and international programs to support the development of robust industries by providing appropriate sector-specific incentives, such as political risk and other insurance opportunities, financing, and other support, for—(i)mining and processing critical minerals;(ii)manufacturing of products, components, and materials that are dependent on critical minerals and are essential to consumer technology products or have important national security implications;(iii)building capacities and creating incentives for recovering used, spent, or discarded equipment and consumer goods containing critical minerals to be safely handled and recycled; and(iv)associated transportation needs that are tailored to the handling, movement, and logistics management of critical minerals and products, components, and materials that are dependent on critical minerals;(4)to establish market-based rules for member countries regarding adoption of qualifying tax and other incentives to stimulate investment, as balanced by market-based disciplines to ensure a fair playing field among those countries;(5)to establish recommended best practices to protect—(A)labor rights;(B)the natural environment and ecosystems near critical mineral industrial sites; and(C)safety of communities near critical mineral industrial activities;(6)to advance economic growth in developing countries with critical mineral reserves and capacities for the recovery and recycling of critical minerals, including for the benefit of the citizens of those countries;(7)to establish rules allowing for the establishment of a consortium that is resourced and empowered to bid and compete in acquiring and securing potential deposits of critical minerals in countries that are not members of the coalition described in subsection (a) (in this section referred to as nonmember countries);(8)to establish a mechanism for joint resource mapping with procedures for equitable sharing of information on potential deposits of critical minerals not less frequently than annually;(9)to establish appropriate mechanisms for the recognition and enforcement by a member country of judgments relating to environmental and related harms caused by mining operations within the territory of the member country in contravention of that country’s laws; and(10)to improve supply chain security among member countries by providing for national treatment investment protections among those countries that are equal to, or better than, the standards in the United States model bilateral investment treaty.(c)

Congressional consultations required

In the course of negotiations described in subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult closely and on a timely basis with, and keep fully apprised of the negotiations, the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of Representatives.

Minerals Security Partnership authorization

(a)

In general

The Secretary of State, acting through the Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment, is authorized to lead United States participation in the Minerals Security Partnership, for the following purposes:(1)To identify and support investment and advocate for commercial critical mineral mining, processing, and refining projects that enable robust and secure critical mineral supply chains, in consultation with other Federal agencies, as appropriate.(2)To coordinate with relevant regional bureaus to develop regional diplomatic engagement strategies related to critical minerals projects and to identify projects that are priorities.(3)To coordinate with United States missions abroad on projects, programs, and investments that enable robust and secure critical mineral supply chains.(4)To coordinate with current and prospective members of the Minerals Security Partnership.(5)To establish a mechanism for information-sharing with members of the Minerals Security Partnership.(6)To establish policies and procedures, and if necessary, to provide funding to facilitate cooperation on joint projects with members of the Minerals Security Partnership and the Minerals Security Forum, including those related to cost-sharing agreements, political risk insurance, financing, equity investments, and other support, in coordination with other Federal agencies, as appropriate.(7)If an agreement described in section 4 is entered into, to support the establishment of the coalition described in that section.(b)

Database

As part of the Minerals Security Partnership, the Secretary, acting through the Under Secretary, is authorized to establish and maintain a database of critical mineral projects for the purpose of providing high quality and up-to-date information to the private sector and, at the discretion of the Under Secretary, to members of the Minerals Security Partnership, in order to spur greater investment, increase the resilience of global critical minerals supply chains, and boost United States supply.(c)

Qualifications for personnel

With respect to staffing personnel to carry out the Minerals Security Partnership, the Secretary shall prioritize individuals with the following qualifications:(1)Substantive knowledge and experience in issues related to critical minerals supply chain and their application to strategic industries, including in the defense, energy, and technology sectors.(2)Substantive knowledge and experience in large-scale multi-donor project financing and related technical and diplomatic arrangements, international coalition-building, and project management.(3)Substantive knowledge and experience in trade and foreign policy, defense industrial base policy, or national security-sensitive supply chain issues.(d)

Private sector coordination

The Secretary shall ensure close coordination between the Department of State, the private sector, and relevant civil society groups on the implementation of this section.(e)

Project selection

(1)

In general

The United States, through its participation in the Minerals Security Partnership, shall prioritize projects that advance the national and economic security interests of the United States and allies and partners of the United States.(2)

Criteria requirements

The United States should advocate for the Minerals Security Partnership to use environmental, social, or governance standards, including as criteria for project selection, that are consistent with United States law or international agreements approved by Congress.

United States membership in the International Nickel Study Group

(a)

United States membership

The President is authorized to accept the Terms of Reference of and maintain membership of the United States in the International Nickel Study Group.(b)

Payments of assessed contributions

For fiscal year 2025 and thereafter, the United States assessed contributions to the International Nickel Study Group may be paid from funds appropriated for Contributions to International Organizations.

Authorization of appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to the Department of State $50,000,000 for fiscal year 2026 to enhance critical mineral supply chain security, including to implement this Act.

Short title

This Act may be cited as the

Critical Minerals Partnership Act of 2025

Definition of critical mineral

In this Act, the term critical mineral—(1)has the meaning given the term in section 7002 of the Energy Act of 2020 (30 U.S.C. 1606); and(2)includes—(A)gold and copper; and(B)any other mineral or mineral material determined by the Secretary of State—(i)to be essential to the economic or national security of the United States; and(ii)to have a supply chain vulnerable to disruption.

Statement of policy on critical mineral supply chains

It is the policy of the United States—(1)to collaborate with allies and partners of the United States to responsibly build secure and resilient critical minerals supply chains, including in the mining, processing, reclamation and recycling, and valuation of critical minerals;(2)to prioritize the development and production of critical mineral resources domestically, including through improvement of systems for collecting and recycling critical minerals from used and discarded goods or equipment, both to supply domestic needs and for export to allies and partners that participate in secure and resilient supply chains for critical minerals;(3)to reduce or eliminate reliance and dependence on critical mineral supply chains controlled by the People’s Republic of China, the Russian Federation, Iran, or any other adversary of the United States;(4)to work with allies and partners on enhancing evaluation capability and technology in trusted countries that produce critical minerals to avoid the export of critical minerals, or products or components that are dependent on critical minerals, that are controlled by adversaries of the United States;(5)to identify and implement market-based incentives for the purposes of facilitating the creation and maintenance of secure and resilient critical mineral supply chains, including for reclamation and recycling of critical mineral resources from waste streams, in collaboration with allies and partners;(6)to prioritize securing critical mineral supply chains in United States foreign policy, including through the use of economic tools to invest responsibly in projects in partner countries in a manner that both benefits local populations and bolsters the supply of critical minerals to the United States and allies and partners of the United States; and(7)that collaboration with allies and partners to build secure and resilient critical mineral supply chains shall not replace United States efforts to increase domestic development and production or recycling of critical minerals.

International negotiations relating to protecting critical mineral supply chains

(a)

In general

Negotiating objectives

The overall objectives for negotiating an agreement described in subsection (a) should be—(1)to establish mechanisms for member countries to build secure and resilient supply chains for critical minerals, including in—(A)the mining, refinement, reclamation and recycling, processing, and valuation of critical minerals; and(B)advanced manufacturing of products, components, and materials that are dependent on critical minerals;(2)to improve economies of scale and joint cooperation with international partners in securing access and means of production throughout the supply chains of critical minerals and manufacturing processes dependent on critical minerals;(3)to establish mechanisms, with appropriate market-based disciplines, that provide and maintain opportunities among member countries for creating industry economies of scale to attract joint investment among those countries, including—(A)cooperation on joint projects, including cost-sharing on building appropriate infrastructure to access deposits of critical minerals; and(B)creation or enhancement of national and international programs to support the development of robust industries by providing appropriate sector-specific incentives, such as political risk and other insurance opportunities, financing, and other support, for—(i)mining and processing critical minerals;(ii)manufacturing of products, components, and materials that are dependent on critical minerals and are essential to consumer technology products or have important national security implications;(iii)building capacities and creating incentives for recovering used, spent, or discarded equipment and consumer goods containing critical minerals to be safely handled and recycled; and(iv)associated transportation needs that are tailored to the handling, movement, and logistics management of critical minerals and products, components, and materials that are dependent on critical minerals;(4)to establish market-based rules for member countries regarding adoption of qualifying tax and other incentives to stimulate investment, as balanced by market-based disciplines to ensure a fair playing field among those countries;(5)to establish recommended best practices to protect—(A)labor rights;(B)the natural environment and ecosystems near critical mineral industrial sites; (C)safety of communities near critical mineral industrial activities; and(D)supplier diversity;(6)to advance economic growth in developing countries with critical mineral reserves and capacities for the recovery and recycling of critical minerals, including for the benefit of the citizens of those countries;(7)to establish rules allowing for the establishment of a consortium that is resourced and empowered to bid and compete in acquiring and securing potential deposits of critical minerals in countries that are not members of the coalition described in subsection (a) (in this section referred to as nonmember countries);(8)to establish a mechanism for joint resource mapping with procedures for equitable sharing of information on potential deposits of critical minerals not less frequently than annually;(9)to establish mechanisms for member countries to recognize and address environmental and related harms caused by mining operations within the territory of a member country; and(10)to improve supply chain security among member countries by providing for national treatment investment protections among those countries that are equal to, or better than, the standards in the United States model bilateral investment treaty.(c)

Congressional consultations required

Rule of construction

Nothing in this section shall be construed to alter United States domestic law, standards, or processes applicable to critical minerals.

Minerals Security Partnership authorization

(a)

In general

Database

Qualifications for personnel

Private sector coordination

The Secretary shall ensure close coordination between the Department of State, the private sector, and relevant civil society groups on the implementation of this section.(e)

Project selection

(1)

In general

Criteria requirements

The United States should advocate for the Minerals Security Partnership to use environmental, human rights, and anticorruption standards, including as criteria for project selection, that are consistent with United States law or international agreements approved by Congress.

United States membership in the International Nickel Study Group

(a)

United States membership

The President is authorized to accept the Terms of Reference of and maintain membership of the United States in the International Nickel Study Group.(b)

Payments of assessed contributions

Report on critical mineral supply chains and diplomatic tools

(a)

In general

Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the heads of other relevant Federal agencies, shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report on priority critical minerals and existing diplomatic tools for advancing the critical minerals policies of the United States.(b)

Elements

The report required by subsection (a) shall—(1)identify, as priority critical minerals, minerals—(A)that are essential inputs into products critical for national security; and(B)the supply of which are highly concentrated in or controlled by one country;(2)assess the key opportunities and challenges related to each priority critical mineral identified under paragraph (1);(3)describe the financial, commercial, and development assistance tools and resources available to advance the critical mineral policies of the United States;(4)describe mechanisms of the United States Government available as of the date of the enactment of this Act to support diplomatic efforts, including the Minerals Security Partnership, to promote the diversification of critical mineral supply chains; and(5)identify the key multilateral institutions engaged on critical mineral issues and describe the participation of the United States in those institutions.(c)

Appropriate congressional committees defined

In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees means—(1)the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and(2)the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

United States diplomatic strategy for securing critical minerals

(a)

In general

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the heads of other relevant Federal agencies, shall develop a strategy for securing the supply chains of a diverse set of critical minerals.(b)

Elements

The strategy required by subsection (a) shall—(1)include—(A)a review of the roles and responsibilities of offices and positions within the Department of State engaged, as of the date of the enactment of this Act, in efforts to secure critical mineral supply chains; and (B)processes to ensure that those offices coordinate and deconflict those efforts;(2)leverage utilization of United States financial, commercial, and development assistance tools and resources to advance the critical mineral policies of the United States;(3)include targeted engagement plans for both countries that are allies and partners of the United States and countries with significant proven and estimated deposits of or processing capacity for minerals critical to national security interests, including utilizing whole-of-government tools and resources to support those countries beyond critical mineral projects;(4)provide for coordination with relevant Federal agencies to consider restrictions on imports of critical minerals to address both price volatility and incentivize sourcing from trusted suppliers;(5)strengthen collaboration with countries that are allies and partners of the United States, and leverage the participation of the United States in the key multilateral institutions engaged on critical mineral issues, in order to diversify the United States supply chain of critical minerals and encourage the participation of the United States in international boards, projects, and standard-making bodies;(6)extend the diplomatic and commercial advocacy support of the United States to private sector entities throughout critical mineral supply chains; and(7)facilitate coordination with countries that are allies and partners of the United States—(A)to identify best practices and develop coordinated standards for critical mineral projects; (B)to protect against inhumane labor practices; and (C)to minimize adverse environmental and social impacts from the critical minerals supply chain.(c)

Briefing required

Not later than 210 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall brief the appropriate congressional committees on the strategy developed under subsection (a).(d)

Appropriate congressional committees defined

Establishment of diplomatic tool to support United States private sector critical mineral projects abroad

(a)

Sense of Congress

It is the sense of Congress that United States private sector entities competing for critical mineral projects abroad need support from the United States Government.(b)

Support

The Secretary of State shall identify an appropriate official or office of the Department of State to establish a mechanism and process for the United States to provide support for critical mineral projects abroad. Such support may include—(1)a mechanism for certifying that critical mineral projects uphold labor rights and minimize environmental impacts; and(2)a process for United States private sector entities to engage with United States embassies in foreign countries for support when pursuing critical mineral projects in such countries.

October 30, 2025

Reported with an amendment