118 HR 5111 IH: Prioritizing Evidence for Workforce Development Act U.S. House of Representatives 2023-08-01 text/xml EN Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.

I118th CONGRESS1st SessionH. R. 5111IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVESAugust 1, 2023Mrs. Houchin (for herself, Mrs. McClain, Mrs. Miller of Illinois, Mr. Bucshon, Mr. James, Mr. Bean of Florida, and Mr. Lawler) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the WorkforceA BILLTo amend the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act to prioritize programs that provide evidence of performance.

1.

Short title

This Act may be cited as the Prioritizing Evidence for Workforce Development Act.

2.

Prioritizing programs that provide evidence of performance

Section 102 of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (29 U.S.C. 3112) is amended—(1)in subsection (b)—(A)in paragraph (1)—(i)in subparagraph (D), by striking and after the semicolon;(ii)in subparagraph (E), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and; and(iii)by adding at the end the following:(F)a description of how the State plans to prioritize the funding of evidence-based programs for which evidence from a rigorous evaluation of the programs shows a positive effect on the target population for the programs, with highest priority given to programs that are high-evidence interventions, next priority given to programs that are moderate-evidence interventions, and next priority given to programs that are low-evidence interventions.; and(B)in paragraph (2)(C)— (i)in clause (vii), by striking and after the semicolon;(ii)in clause (viii), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and; and(iii)by adding at the end the following:(ix)how the State will prioritize the funding of evidence-based programs for which evidence from a rigorous evaluation of the programs shows a positive effect on the target population for the programs.; and(2)by adding at the end the following:(d)

Definitions

In subsection (b):(1)

Evidence-based

The term evidence-based, used with respect to an activity, strategy, or other intervention, means a high-evidence, moderate-evidence, or low-evidence intervention.(2)

High-evidence

The term high-evidence, used with respect to an intervention, means an intervention that is shown to produce a sizable, sustained effect on important outcomes, in—(A)two or more well-conducted experimental studies carried out in typical community settings and conducted at different implementation sites; or(B)one large multisite well-conducted experimental study carried out in such a setting. (3)

Low-evidence

The term low-evidence, used with respect to an intervention, means an intervention that is shown to produce or have the potential to produce a positive effect on important outcomes, in a study based on a reasonable hypothesis and with credible research findings, such as a correlational study with statistical controls for selection bias or descriptive research such as a case study. (4)

Moderate-evidence

The term moderate-evidence, used with respect to an intervention, means an intervention that is shown to produce a positive effect, that is sizable but not yet conclusive, on important outcomes, in at least one well-conducted experimental study, or in a rigorous quasi-experimental study from which a researcher can draw a causal conclusion regarding the intervention’s effectiveness.(5)

Well-conducted experimental study

The term well-conducted experimental study means an experimental study such as a study with randomized controlled trials..