<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="billres.xsl"?>
<!DOCTYPE bill PUBLIC "-//US Congress//DTDs/bill.dtd//EN" "bill.dtd">
<bill bill-stage="Introduced-in-Senate" dms-id="A1" public-private="public">
	<metadata xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<dublinCore>
<dc:title>113 S2605 IS: Preserving Religious Freedom and a Woman’s Access to Contraception Act</dc:title>
<dc:publisher>U.S. Senate</dc:publisher>
<dc:date>2014-07-15</dc:date>
<dc:format>text/xml</dc:format>
<dc:language>EN</dc:language>
<dc:rights>Pursuant to Title 17 Section 105 of the United States Code, this file is not subject to copyright protection and is in the public domain.</dc:rights>
</dublinCore>
</metadata>
<form>
		<distribution-code display="yes">II</distribution-code>
		<congress>113th CONGRESS</congress><session>2d Session</session>
		<legis-num>S. 2605</legis-num>
		<current-chamber>IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES</current-chamber>
		<action>
			<action-date date="20140715">July 15, 2014</action-date>
			<action-desc><sponsor name-id="S340">Ms. Ayotte</sponsor> (for herself, <cosponsor name-id="S174">Mr. McConnell</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S357">Mrs. Fischer</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S300">Mr. Burr</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S290">Mr. Chambliss</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S287">Mr. Cornyn</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S293">Mr. Graham</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S153">Mr. Grassley</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S118">Mr. Hatch</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S305">Mr. Isakson</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S197">Mr. McCain</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S349">Mr. Portman</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S323">Mr. Risch</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S303">Mr. Thune</cosponsor>, <cosponsor name-id="S318">Mr. Wicker</cosponsor>, and <cosponsor name-id="S321">Mr. Johanns</cosponsor>) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the <committee-name committee-id="SSFI00">Committee on Finance</committee-name></action-desc>
		</action>
		<legis-type>A BILL</legis-type>
		<official-title>To preserve religious freedom and a woman’s access to contraception.</official-title>
	</form>
	<legis-body><section id="id8E295F7339FD4239B16C9ABB2E50BDC8" section-type="section-one"><enum>1.</enum><header>Short title</header><text display-inline="no-display-inline">This Act may be cited as the <quote><short-title>Preserving Religious Freedom and a Woman’s Access to Contraception Act</short-title></quote>.</text>
		</section><section id="id970f1366f864405f8aa81cb648dc666e"><enum>2.</enum><header>Findings</header><text display-inline="no-display-inline">Congress makes the following findings:</text><paragraph id="idE251DC52E0894600A8BEF2A69BB9515C"><enum>(1)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">Instead of restricting Americans’ religious freedoms, Congress should preserve a woman’s ability to
			 make contraceptive decisions for herself.</text></paragraph><paragraph id="id5D44825C803C4E68986F693C5EF81A44"><enum>(2)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">The freedom of religion is the first freedom listed in the First Amendment to the Constitution of
			 the United States,  and Congress has a strong interest in protecting the
			 free
			 exercise of religion for Americans of all faiths.</text></paragraph><paragraph id="idC4C9CDD83BE44A90BC3FF7ACE39668F0"><enum>(3)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">The Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 was signed by President Clinton on November 16, 1993,
			 after
			 passing the House of Representatives unanimously and passing the Senate 
			 with the
			 votes of  97 Senators, including 16 currently serving Senators and the
			 Vice President.</text></paragraph><paragraph id="idC4AEDAD257334BF597D111EB41F63F74"><enum>(4)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 provides important protections against discrimination on
			 the
			 basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.</text></paragraph><paragraph id="idB89B9FBDA5BA47AC8E57F05785F99462"><enum>(5)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and amendments made by that Act  establish
			 comprehensive protections to
			 ensure that any medications used by or prescribed for	an individual are
			 not
			 disclosed to an employer in its capacity as an employer.</text></paragraph><paragraph id="id6B8F5AFABD74449896F3668D874A7AE1"><enum>(6)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">The Food and Drug Administration has found a number of contraceptives to be proven safe and
			 effective at preventing pregnancies as well as in managing certain medical
			 conditions.</text></paragraph><paragraph id="id982C08C0B6EB4B07B74C9EFA784CA8AA"><enum>(7)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">There are 5 programs, including the  Medicaid program, carried out by  the Department of Health and
			 Human Services that provide
			 access to contraception for low-income women.</text></paragraph><paragraph id="id8754A54F025B4CE490479AD67AF392A7"><enum>(8)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">Federal and State government spending for contraceptive services totaled $2,370,000,000 in fiscal
			 year 2010
			 and
			 the Medicaid program financed 75 percent of government spending for family
			 planning.</text></paragraph><paragraph id="idF0CBAF9FF8D547DE861B8BD437C744FD"><enum>(9)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">More than 19,000,000 women were eligible for government-supported contraceptive services in
			 2010.</text></paragraph><paragraph id="id762C8855293445A2AF091F67B0F1FBAD"><enum>(10)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">Even before Obamacare mandated that employers fully subsidize employees' contraception, women had
			 wide access to Food and Drug
			 Administration-approved
			 contraception and such contraception was covered by insurance at  over 85
			 percent of large businesses.</text></paragraph><paragraph id="idBB3B008EA10C441C80718E02F5ECBA4D"><enum>(11)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">Now, Obamacare’s various requirements cause an unprecedented intrusion of government mandates into
			 Americans’ personal health care decisions, including unprecedented Federal
			 mandates that employers become involved in those decisions, and the
			 individual mandate, which requires individuals to purchase health
			 insurance
			 or pay a penalty.</text></paragraph><paragraph id="idFD403A332BF144DCBB1AE43281CC2B8C"><enum>(12)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">Obamacare has created an enormous disruption in the personal health insurance options of millions
			 of Americans whose health insurance plans were cancelled or whose
			 preferred doctors were not included  in their new health insurance plan
			 networks.</text></paragraph><paragraph id="idA3CB97F8593B47F892E6E520B45363B9"><enum>(13)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">The Congressional Budget Office estimates that Obamacare could reduce employment by the equivalent
			 of 2,000,000 jobs over the next 10 years.</text></paragraph><paragraph id="id1BB76FFF79524F3BAD47FFA6E5BDB0E0"><enum>(14)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">One of Obamacare’s mandates places 2,600,000 Americans, nearly two-thirds of them women, at risk of
			 having their hours and wages reduced, according to the Hoover Institution.</text></paragraph><paragraph id="idCF9FB94D30A34FEDB23EA72FB9C5A758"><enum>(15)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">Obamacare’s cuts to the  Medicare Advantage program  and other regulatory actions could reduce the
			 average
			 benefit for women who rely on the program by $1,538 per year, or 13
			 percent.</text></paragraph><paragraph id="id41743C5A3B5C43CA99B2D8CA564EC927"><enum>(16)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">Obamacare’s payroll tax increase creates an inequitable tax penalty for married working women.</text></paragraph><paragraph id="idFB44023D345944F4BAC228E8D2DE41E1"><enum>(17)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">Obamacare places limitations on health savings accounts, flexible spending accounts, and other
			 consumer-directed health savings vehicles, which help approximately
			 17,400,000 Americans to save for their own health expenses, including
			 contraceptives.</text></paragraph><paragraph id="id14D7E71138FF4229986A6C0A9E96BCFB"><enum>(18)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">The current Administration has granted discretionary compliance waivers from Obamacare to a variety
			 of for-profit businesses, unions, and other organizations.</text></paragraph><paragraph id="idCFE834397387445FB86555373C11F008"><enum>(19)</enum><text display-inline="yes-display-inline">To date, the Department of Health and Human Services  has granted more than 1,000 individual waiver
			 requests for employers and insurers,
			 excusing the employers and insurers  from compliance with various aspects
			 of the law.</text></paragraph></section><section id="id2c6df2d69599416aa77c5f0cae7e43d4"><enum>3.</enum><header>Sense of the Senate</header><text display-inline="no-display-inline">It is the sense of the Senate that the Food and Drug Administration should study whether
			 contraceptives that are  available with a prescription, on the date of
			 enactment of this Act,  would be safe and
			 effective for adults if available without a prescription.</text></section><section id="id26e0713e7a2c4a819905228346325a18"><enum>4.</enum><header>Employee protection</header><text display-inline="no-display-inline">Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an employer who is engaged in interstate commerce  may
			 not prohibit an employee from
			 purchasing, pursuant to State prescribing and
			 dispensing laws, a drug or medical device, including a contraceptive, that
			 is regulated by
			 the Food and Drug Administration.</text></section><section id="idb2146befc18d434996a238768ffed51a"><enum>5.</enum><header>Empowering employees to make health choices</header><subsection id="id72c99ef8b3e24cdc91af7c5df07857cf"><enum>(a)</enum><header>No limitations based on whether a drug is prescribed</header><text>Section 9003 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (<external-xref legal-doc="public-law" parsable-cite="pl/111/148">Public Law 111–148</external-xref>), and the
			 amendments made by such section, are repealed, and the Internal Revenue
			 Code of 1986 shall be applied as if such section, and amendments, had
			 never been enacted.</text></subsection><subsection id="ida72df4c0993d4a0698f87d2ac317884d"><enum>(b)</enum><header>No limitations on health FSAs</header><text>Sections 9005 and 10902 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (<external-xref legal-doc="public-law" parsable-cite="pl/111/148">Public Law 111–148</external-xref>) and
			 section 1403 of the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010
			 (<external-xref legal-doc="public-law" parsable-cite="pl/111/152">Public Law 111–152</external-xref>), and the amendments made by such sections, are
			 repealed, and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 shall be applied as if
			 such section, and amendments, had never been enacted.</text></subsection></section></legis-body>
</bill>


